http://www.perilousthoughts.com/content/charnel-pit/SybianOfPeril.html

has a gimp called Amy on a Sybian horse peril which as Gimpers know Amy Hesketh on a Spanish horse peril in Maleficarum released last Halloween and both Amys look alike Too. Spooky or what?

Well maybe look a little alike which bring me to my Amy question, is there a Spanish horse torture in "Dead but Dreaming" or other movies? Bill K.

http://www.suckx.net/riding+sybian+horse.html

which until yesterday I didn't even know existed or at least I did not know that the device was called.

Does anyone know are there any history of non electric (the Sybian horse is a electrical device) kinds of pussy torture dildo devices used by inquisitors for torture in conjunction with Spanish horse, or are they just a ladies sex toy? Bill K.

You wrote:

Now, I just have to finish writing the review. All that's needed is a little discipline, I guess....

So many times I've uttered those very words...here's hoping you're successful.

I am a fiery gimp kind of gimper but please Amy do another Spanish horse torture scene in the next with any kind of wood and slippery shape you desire.

How about it Gimpers, what Maleficarum dungeon Amy and Mila torture would you like to see repeated or some other inquisition torture method or device that was not done in Maleficarum.

You can't just have another Maleficarum type bats movie and have same prebats confess torture methods, can you? I would keep the Spanish horse and rack but what else and what would you add? Not a poll question. Bill K.

Thanks for the little YouTube short subject. Even though there wasn't a whole lot to write home about in the end, as someone who enjoys situational GIMP, it was easily worth at least a little more than I paid for it.

To meditate at one's leisure on scenarios of humiliation and torture.

To imagine the apparatus and what form it should take. (Rather than staining another Spanish Horse oak or mahogany, I would suggest colours that suggest dried blood and piss, and maybe other bodily excretions!).

To write the scene in which your naked, defenceless body is abused and tortured, all the time imagining the actual experience.

To film such a scene, surrounded by a crew (and bystanders) actually witnessing your distress, enjoying your naked, helpless body.

And then to launch the film onto the world stage; where thousands, tens of thousands; witness, lust after your naked body; engage with your pain, abuse and degradation; desire to be your torturers.

What bliss for the masochist and sub/slave.

Thomas Chaser et. al. More recent Cortez stories can be found on the above rppstories site.

How about it Gimpers, what Maleficarum dungeon Amy and Mila torture would you like to see repeated or some other inquisition torture method or device that was not done in Maleficarum.

It's sort of hard knowing how to do another movie as good as Maleficarum without just doing the same stuff again (minus the roasting scene...sorry, but it just didn't float my boat).

However, I would like to see the rack retained and of course of course of course the whip and plenty of it. Also I would retain the branding iron. Perhaps a few nice smokies on a ripe, round buttock cheek would be fun, or even on a thigh perhaps???

But moreover, what about a bit of the good old thumbscrew and perhaps the iron boot or leg crusher like the one the delicious Gina Lollobrigida was put in during the Hunchback of Notre Dame. Not to completely splinter the bones as these devices were capable of doing, but just to squeeze the lovelies in question a bit closer to confession.

Also I would like to see a bit more interaction between the torturer and the victim. They urging her to confess and Amy just shaking her head between gasps of pain and then waiting for them to increase the inducement to talk.

Yes it's not all good, clean, family fun and that's why I like it.

Greg S.

Amy Hesketh wrote:

Thank you so very much for the promotion at the top of the site for Le Marquis de la Croix! And the banner link this week as well, coolness.

You're welcome, I think people will be interested in Le Marquis. The banner link was not intentional, though. They're on a revolving queue; by sheer coincidence, yours came up the week your promotion started.

----------------

Bill K wrote:

Ralphus, if I want to post pictures here, how do I do it?

I'll send you an e-mail with instructions. The only problem most people have is finding a free site that will host adult material. Sites like ImageShack and PhotoBucket will delete anything they find objectionable. So I usually donate my space at Ralphus.net if people can't find anywhere else.

----------------

A Canadian wrote:

There are a couple of other films I want to see in November. One is IPTD-981, where Rio plays a teacher who is raped.

Hopefully tied up and raped, right? Hard to tell from the tiny pictures on the box. I like Rio...a lot. It would be a shame to rape a hot ticket like that and not have the decency to tie her up first.

----------------

DHT wrote:

This is too long for me to watch (48 min) so I can't describe what it's about, but there is a chair tie, tape gag, and some nice groping in the 2nd half of a nice blonde.

I watched the entire 48 minutes and it's actually pretty decent. Good find there. The bondage should have been tighter and the cloth should have gone inside her mouth instead of how they did it, but small independent filmmakers seldom ever get the bondage and gaggage right. Come to think of it, neither do most filmmakers, period. But I digress.

The important thing is the victim was cute, they beat her up a bit before she got tied up, and the lead villain was really cool, saying the things I would say to a tied-up chick. I also like how he grabbed her tits a few times while she was tied up. As to the ending of the story...oh well. I've seen cliches like that so often I've come to expect them. Still worth checking out.

Here's some stills I made from the movie.

----------------

Dan Hawke: Good to see you here again. You know, most of my favorite writers in this genre write about the goings-on from the victim's point of view. "Let's Go Play At The Adams" (probably the best book ever written about bondage) also described a lot of the action from the captive babysitter's perspective, as well as online writers Kirsten Smart and our very own Eda Chang. There's a reason why Eda's work is so highly acclaimed. I noticed she just got another positive posting this morning about her stories.

I would like to host your "Funtime for Jody" story here. Send it to me via-email. I'll even make sure we give you the proper credit this time. I'd definitely be interested in reading it.

Hopefully tied up and raped, right? Hard to tell from the tiny pictures on the box. I like Rio...a lot. It would be a shame to rape a hot ticket like that and not have the decency to tie her up first.

We shall see. It looks like she's bound in some of the images (see the link in my url) but I'm not sure how convincing it is. I did take a peek at the opening minutes of the film and it certainly has great production values (which is usually the case for Idea Pocket films).

But first things first. There is still that matter of a review to be written (of a different film).

Inquisitionists used spit roast type fiery gimp to execute by burning to death confessed witches instead of the traditional vertical stake, a sort of a horizontal bats and not to get a confession.

I for one would love to see Amy and or Mila do another spit roast torture death peril movie but it does not have to be Inquisition related.

There was a torture chair which had spiked seat and hot coals but under the seat like this picture:

http://www.stakedamsels.com/forum/download/file.php?id=6012&mode=view

by BMovie shows something that was used to get confessions by the Inquisitionists that I would like to see in Amy's next dungeon torture movie. Bill K.

It's not big deal because most of time I can just post the address of the gimp picture I find here but sometimes there are one or two gimp pictures I find that just screams to post directly here. Thank you, Bill K.

Thanks to all for the great posts these last few weeks.

Greg

Now, while going after porn is not one of those official issues that gets covered in Mitt Romney's campaign, make no mistake, he will indeed attack the porn industry as well as our access to view what we want in the comfort of our own homes. Not only that, he'll be wasting untold millions of our tax dollars in the process. I'm not just crying wolf and trying to scare people, I'm looking at what's happened in the past every time there's been a Republican in the White House, and things are worse now because the party as a whole has gotten more and more extreme to the right than ever before.

It's not just that Mitt Romney is the problem, although he is, quite possibly, the most openly dishonest Presidential candidate we've ever had. He's a serial liar who will say anything it takes to win. He's great at looking you in the eye and telling you what you want to hear, and millions have drunk the Kool-Aid and are planning to vote for him.

The economy is still slow after the economic disaster we had with Bush and people are believing the "12 million new jobs" promise that he's feeding to the masses, a plan that has no basis in fact and has been reputed by every fact-checking organization out there. The numbers don't add up, and he's counting on people who are impatient with Obama and will vote for anyone who's not him, whether his plan holds water or not. And even worse, he's also counting on people not bothering to check the facts at all and just falling for the whole scheme. Basically, he's hoping there's enough desperate and ignorant people out there that he can pull this off.

But again, getting back to policy, it's not just Romney. He's merely doing the Republican party's bidding for them. And the normal platform for the Republican party is that they are against porn and their agenda is to enact laws that will restrict it. There's no question they will carry on the severe anti-porn policies that Bush imposed on the adult industry during his 8 years in office.

And if that doesn't convince you, they're also against women. No matter how much they'll try to whitewash their intentions, their plan is to take away every woman's right to control her own body. If Romney is elected he'll be the one to nominate at least one and maybe 2 Supreme Court justices, which will give him the majority he needs to make all abortion illegal in this country. He even admitted that he would gladly sign off on such legislation.

And the Republican party is in bed with Big Business. That's who dictates their agenda of easing restrictions on Wall Street regulations, which is exactly why we're in the financial mess we're in today. That's why Romney's tax plan gives huge tax breaks to rich corporations (and incidentally, lowers his own tax rate to less than 1%).

Why do you think that corporate billionaires have pored endless millions into negative ads to try to discredit the President and get Romney elected? Think about it. Do you really think they're trying to buy the Presidency to make America better for YOU?

These guys are willing to say anything and spend anything it takes to protect their profits. This election is basically the people vs. Corporate America, the little guys vs. the Mr. Potters of this world. The good news is there are more of us than there are of them.

But this can only happen if you VOTE. I know, it's a pain in the ass to have to get off your La-Z-Boy and head on down to the polling booth, you hate both candidates and you think there's no way your one vote could make a difference anyway. But guess what? There are 90 million people who are planning on NOT voting this Tuesday. 90,000,000!! You think 90 million people can't make a difference? You could be one of those people that changes things for the better. Get out and cast your vote, it'll make you feel good to know that your voice is being heard, that you do matter and that you're doing something important for your country.

I'm Ralphus the sadistic midget and I approved this message.

Back on Sept. 25, 2010, I predicted the issue that tests whether or not President Obama believes in free speech would not be pornography, but radical Islam (September 2010 archives). At the risk of sounding like a know-it-all, I was right.

Putting aside the fact Obama's storyline about the deaths in Benghazi was false, GIMPers still have to recognize the Obama administration spent two weeks raising questions about whether an American should have the right to make a movie (or, at least, the trailer to a movie) such as The Innocence of Muslims that is offensive to others.

Comments made by Obama, Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice suggest the administration is not convinced Americans should have such a right. That's troubling for every American who believes in free speech and opposes state censorship. It should be very troubling for GIMPers.

Those of you who are heading to the polls on Tuesday can vote as you wish. All I would say is do it with your eyes open.

I'm A Canadian, and I approve of your right to offend others.

If you want four more years of the same of worse economy, vote Obama. When no one has a job and hence no money, they will not be able to afford anything let alone GIMP items.

I have already voted for Romney. 'Nuff said.

Baron von Folter

At the risk of sounding like a know-it-all, I was right.

Um...no, you're not. In fact, you're flat out wrong, my adversarial Canadian friend (which immediately spawns the question as to why someone who isn't even affected by US elections should be so outspoken on this subject).

Do you recall seeing any bills to censor The Innocence of Muslims online? As a matter of fact, you can find it on YouTube right now. One can question whether it was a good idea to create such a video in the first place, but that's really grasping at straws if you're trying to equate a religious propaganda video with the Republican agenda to make access to porn more difficult. Do you really want me to give you a laundry list of all the things the Republicans have done in the past to go after adult entertainment?

By contrast, the only major move regarding porn the Obama administration enacted during the past four years was the decision to shut down the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force (see Homepage URL). In other words, NOT continue to waste our tax dollars prosecuting porn. That's a complete 180 from how things were under Bush. Of course, who were the ones who objected to this decision? You guessed it, the Republicans.

------------------

Baron von Folter wrote:

CHEAP SHOT and very disappointing. A virtual litany of democrat lies and talking points.

Not a cheap shot at all. Talking points, yes, but only if you consider "talking points" to be facts you ignored when you cast your ballot for Romney. And if anything I wrote is a lie, I'll shave my afro.

I will say that I believe difficult discussions and open dialogues are necessary for understanding and, hopefully, reasoned resolutions. It is dangerous to condemn people for cultivating those discussions, since the alternative is to act without any dialogue at all. I struggle with my own thoughts about the "right" of any fanatical group--whether Muslims or Christians, conservatives or liberals--to say inflammatory and hateful things to roil emotions, often with the express purpose of compelling others to act on those heightened emotions. I am not so simple-minded that I can unreservedly defend free speech on principle knowing that it can be so easily used toward destructive ends. Reasonable and responsible citizens would not so misuse such a precious freedom, but those sorts of folks seem to be in the minority right now.

I also believe it is intellectually weak to vote based on a single issue. Actually, I believe it is pretty fucking stupid.

However, to bring this back to GIMPdom, while there is substantial evidence that religious (and political) nuts are all-too easily stampeded into precipitous and destructive action by carefully crafted religious, heretical, or ideological propaganda, I see absolutely no evidence that Maleficarum, Kink.com videos, or Eda Chang's fiction has ever compelled anyone to go on a GIMP spree. I'm not sure discussions about limiting purposefully inciteful speech necessarily will lead to the same attention to GIMP, even though certain women's groups would probably make an ineffective argument to the contrary. But we will always have to deal with the lunatic fringe.

* * * *

Baron von Folter: Do your homework, man. At least go back and see what the economy actually looked like in the last quarter of 2008. It was in a tailspin. There was talk of massive bankruptcies and a worldwide depression. The unemployment numbers were skyrocketing. Employment numbers were plunging. You don't even have to do a lot of reading. Just go back and read the headlines. You could reasonably argue that the economy hasn't gotten better fast enough to suit you or your political party, but to say it has not improved and continued to improve defies the evidence. If you believe this country's economy was in better shape in 2008 than it is right now, there is no hope for you. See the last line of my previous paragraph.

I also believe it is intellectually weak to vote based on a single issue. Actually, I believe it is pretty fucking stupid.

Agreed. Absolutely.

Indeed, that was why I ended my previous post without endorsing one candidate or the other.

If I were an American, my vote wouldn't be based on my views on pornography. However, the sadistic midget who runs this joint said "political postings are allowed here as long as they relate to the theme of the site, which in this case concerns free speech and censorship." You can't fault me for following the rules.

Since our discussion is restricted to censorship and free speech, I do think American GIMPers need to think about this: How likely is it that a society that embraces government efforts to "reject" any "hateful" and "inflammatory" comments about religion would turn around and support porn films depicting rape and violence against women? Not likely, if you ask me.

We know that people who enjoy violent porn films and Eda Chang's stories aren't bad people. But try explaining that to your friends, your family members, and Sean Hannity.

If you're going to support free speech, you have to support it for everyone, including religious zealots and others who may offend you. I side with something conservative pundit Mark Steyn once said: "If you're only in favor of freedom of expression for people you agree with, you're not doing it right."

-----

Ralphus wrote:

Do you recall seeing any bills to censor The Innocence of Muslims online?

No, but I don't think it's all that common for presidents to introduce new legislation two months before an election.

I do recall seeing the filmmaker taken into custody on some bogus charge about a probation violation. I would assume most GIMPers oppose the idea of government arresting filmmakers whose films are "offensive" to others, regardless of whether the filmmakers are pornographers (of adult content) or religious zealots.

I really never wanted to become a green Dog Democrat --- proverbially someone who would vote for a green dog before casting a ballot for anyone else in any other party. Thirty years ago I would have easily supported a Republican such as Chuck Percy, or Ed Brook or --- more recently -- Chuck Hagel from Nebraska. But no more. How can half of the voting public NOT be willing to hold Republicans accountable for the birther nonsense, personhood, limits on contraception, creationism... and most certainly greater restrictions on freedom of expression? Does any one really believe that Romney wouldn't appoint US Attorneys and judges who would go after pornography?

Baron von Folter: Your comment is so similar to what I hear from conservative friends that I could have written it myself. Each and every one voted for W twice (although they don't talk about it much) and said nary a word as he dug a hole so deep that for awhile we faced a total financial collapse. And now they complain that his successor --- in the face of obstruction from the opposition party at ALL junctures--- has not brought the economy back fast enough. And then, just in case we want to challenge their position, cross their arms and walk away grumbling "nuff said".

I would guess that I could point out more flaws in what the current administration has done in the past four years than most of those in the opposition. But given the extremism that is the current Republican party, when I vote on Tuesday, it won't even be close. Until the insanity subsides, call me a green Dog Democrat.

~ Americans, Canadians and world residents of other persuasions who observe American elections need to be able to distinguish between campaign rhetoric and policy. The former is what they say, the latter is what they do. I view Obama's huffing about "rejecting hateful speech" the same way I view Romney's sputtering about "enforcing laws against all forms of pornography": as pastries for public consumption. I think it's safe to say that regardless of who gets elected president, the impetus to restrict free speech will come primarily from interest groups and congressional freaks who are looking to score some points (or dollars) by appearing to be "tough" on pornography/hate speech/objectification of women/etc.

Personally, I am more concerned about said groups and freaks than I am about who happens to get one more vote in the Electoral College than the other.

~ Since most experts think Tuesday's outcome will depend on the actions of 4 or 5 undecided voters in Ohio, I say we locate these wishy-washy folks and put them to the question: What are your views on free speech? Do you have a preference for ropes or chains? Are you a gag snob? What is your stand on allowing the import of Bolivian-made movies that depict women being tortured?

~ Anyone who thinks this election is about which guy is going to improve the American economy has been drinking funny Kool-Aid. American presidents have no power to "manage" the economy, despite their boasts to the contrary. That job falls to the Federal Reserve Bank, which is a private, central bank whose board of governors cannot even balance their own household checkbooks.

If one were to pose the oft-heard question, "Are you better off now than you were four years ago?" my answer would be no. But ask me if I'm better off now than I was three years ago. Definitely yes. Being better off means that I can afford to buy more GIMPage materials. Four years ago I could not afford to buy any. Huzzah!

Now...who should I reward for that?

Whenever either political party loses power they spend every waking moment trying to appeal to the corporate elite and bash the other guy's policies in hopes that they'll gain power back (and receive all the perks$$$ associated with that) but they have to wait their turn. Their turn will come when the last guy has been used up and the corporate elite need to give the appearance of "change". Obama was the inspirational messiah that made people forget about Bush and look to the future (meanwhile he basically just continued where Bush left off).

It's all one big puppet show. Rape the people until they're about to crack and then give them a doggie treat and get them ready for round two.

I honestly don't think there's been a legitimate election in the U.S. since 2000 at least. Candidates are handpicked and given their orders before voting day.

Until people realize they're just being led around by the nose and none of the campaign garbage means anything nothing will change.

If things get bad enough (which they just might) we could see a third party introduced in the next few years but that will just be another "character" to the play to make people think progress is being made.

It's not just that Mitt Romney is the problem, although he is, quite possibly, the most openly dishonest Presidential candidate we've ever had.
The onus is on you here. What lies has he told? I suggest that the current office holder has that record by a country mile.

The economy is still slow after the economic disaster we had with Bush and people are believing the "12 million new jobs" promise that he's feeding to the masses, a plan that has no basis in fact and has been reputed by every fact-checking organization out there.
This is not a "fact" that can be checked. At least he has a plan. Unlike the current office holder who's only plan is the take a bunch of past failed policies and put them in a shinny folder.

If Romney is elected he'll be the one to nominate at least one and maybe 2 Supreme Court justices, which will give him the majority he needs to make all abortion illegal in this country..
Not true that the court overturning Roe vs Wade would make abortion illegal. It would only send it back to the states to decide.

That's why Romney's tax plan gives huge tax breaks to rich corporations (and incidentally, lowers his own tax rate to less than 1%).
Come on. This is pure B. S.

But this can only happen if you VOTE. I know, it's a pain in the ass to have to get off your La-Z-Boy and head on down to the polling booth.
I did. And Romney is going to win Florida baring any "shenanigans".

John: You could reasonably argue that the economy hasn't gotten better fast enough to suit you or your political party.
Gotten better? By every measure it has gotten worse. Unemployment is higher and we are Five Trillion more in debt to start. And we have nothing to show for it except a bunch of bankrupt green energy companies. Oh, BTW, the company owners that got all that money were all huge contributors to the current office holder.

Baron von Folter

While I am here: To those who blame 'The Opposition' for the office holder's problems; I remind you that for the first two years he had a huge majority in the House and a Veto proof Senate. The 'Opposition' could not stop anything.

Baron von Folter

(1) Despite your bold proclamation to the contrary in your post to me, unemployment is getting better. See this article from yesterday's Washington Post. It is another case of not getting better fast enough to suit critics. I will say this, though. If you look at the bottom left graph in that article, you can clearly see that it has taken President Obama four years to try unsuccessfully to completely undo the unemployment damage it took President George W. Bush only one year to inflict. I suppose it is easier to demolish something than it is to rebuild it.

(2) In answer to your challenge to Ralphus to document his claim that Mitt Romney is quite the accomplished liar, here is a link to Chronicling Mitt's Mendacity, Volume XLI, the most recent list of his weekly lies. (A total of 33 just this week.) If you go to the bottom of the list, you can actually link back to the last 40 weeks of his lies, week by week. Links are helpfully provided to the documentation. I doubt any of this will change your mind, but it does respond to your demand for evidence of his lies.

* * * * *

A Canadian: Alas, I did admit that I am struggling with the whole issue of freedom of speech. You are quite correct that true freedom of speech must apply to everyone equally. However, unlike, say, the "right to bear arms," where misusing firearms to kill someone is punishable as murder, there is no similar recourse to punish someone who misuses the right of free speech to harm someone, or compel others to harm someone. It is fairly apparent when using a firearm crosses the line into misuse (although Florida's Trayvon Martin case seems to be doing a great job of blurring that distinction), but it is not so apparent when speech crosses that line. I don't know the answer, but I know it is complicated.

On a separate note, I look forward to your upcoming JAV reviews.

* * * * *

Amy Hesketh and Reine Margot: Thanks for the excellent updates from the world of Red Feline. It is always an absolute pleasure to catch up with what's going on in your, umm, domain. I am really enjoying the daily pictures from Le Marquis de la Croix as well. I am pretty sure you must have supplied those to Ralphus.

* * * * *

Ralphus: Hey, dude. A belated thank you for the nice review of Playing With Fire. Nice pictures as well. The movie itself doesn't do much for me--meaning I am not going to go running out to find it immediately--but it is now on my list of "targets of opportunity" in case it comes my way.

...and in NO way whatsoever is Obama anywhere near the professional, accomplished, unbelievable liar Romney is. No matter what FOX news and Rush "big baby head" Limbaugh says.

-------------------

It's not just that Mitt Romney is the problem, although he is, quite possibly, the most openly dishonest Presidential candidate we've ever had.
The onus is on you here. What lies has he told? I suggest that the current office holder has that record by a country mile.
Omigod, what hasn't Romney lied about? Here's a few for you:

PolitiFact.com: All False statements involving Mitt Romney

Romney's Seven Biggest Debate Lies

At Last Night's Debate: Romney Told 27 Myths In 38 Minutes

He's currently running a TV and radio ad here in Ohio that claims Jeep is moving all their production jobs to China, an out and out lie that even Chrysler had to come out publicly and refute. Romney refused to take it off the air.

I could write paragraph after paragraph detailing Romney's lies. There are so many of them. I swear, he lies about everything! Google "Romney lies" and you get 138 million responses.

-------------------

The economy is still slow after the economic disaster we had with Bush and people are believing the "12 million new jobs" promise that he's feeding to the masses, a plan that has no basis in fact and has been reputed by every fact-checking organization out there.
This is not a "fact" that can be checked. At least he has a plan. Unlike the current office holder who's only plan is the take a bunch of past failed policies and put them in a shinny folder.
His "plan" is full of holes and the numbers don't add up. You can do your own Google search, since there's all kinds of fact-checkers that say the same thing, but here's what the Washington Post had to say. BTW, they gave Romney's claim about the 12 million jobs "Four Pinocchios."

Mitt Romney's "new math" for jobs plan doesn't add up

-------------------

If Romney is elected he'll be the one to nominate at least one and maybe 2 Supreme Court justices, which will give him the majority he needs to make all abortion illegal in this country..
Not true that the court overturning Roe vs Wade would make abortion illegal. It would only send it back to the states to decide.
You don't know that, but even if it were true, that would make entire states where a woman could not legally obtain an abortion, millions of women with no other option for ending their pregnancies. That's taking women's reproductive rights back some 50 years.

-------------------

That's why Romney's tax plan gives huge tax breaks to rich corporations (and incidentally, lowers his own tax rate to less than 1%).
Come on. This is pure B. S.
Slight correction: It's actually his Vice Presidential running mate, Paul Ryan, who has a tax plan that, if implemented, would take Romney's own personal tax rate to 0.82%. It remains to be seen which plan he will go with should he be elected.

Mitt Romney Would Pay 0.82 Percent in Taxes Under Paul Ryan's Plan

-------------------

Romney is going to win Florida baring any "shenanigans".
The only "shenanigans" going on in the state of Florida is a huge voter suppression drive to prevent many of that state's Latino and minority voters from getting a chance to cast their ballots, all of it instituted by Republican governor Rick Scott.

If the Republicans succeed in winning this election by lying and suppressing the vote, that will tell them that it's perfectly okay to keep this up because the ends justify the means. For that reason alone, Obama needs to win.

While I know all of you have your favorites, is one of these styles actually more popular than the others?

As positions go, my favorite is upside down, arms tied.

However, if the scene involves some whipping, then I prefer arms over head. I don't think it matters to me if the arms are spread or not.

As to which is the favorite among all GIMPers, well, we would need a poll to decide that, which might not be a bad idea right about now. Just based on hearing what others have had to say over the years, it seems like horizontal spread-eagle would be the likely winner. But I could be wrong.

I'm straining to remember the name of the movie that is the source for the first pic:

Of course, I'm partial to the Corinne Clery image - exquisite, moist babe in an excellent pose with nicely done whip marks - which made quite an impression on me when I first saw it in the cinema.

Of your choices, I love them all except for the upside down with arms hanging free. I know there's not much she can do with her hands in that position, but having them tied behind her is much more secure bondage and even more helpless for her. Hanging her upside down like a piece of meat is the dehumanizing aspect that I really dig.

I do know that obscenity cases are pretty difficult for the feds to win. Guess they nailed Max Hardcore on it, though.

One thing I actually did notice, though, is that Bush's terms in office did have a noticable chilling effect on what companies seemed to be willing to shoot. I've noticed that Kink (which is always pretty mainstream and tame, but even moreso under Bush) has started doing some edgier content in the last few years. It seemed like "consensual non-consensual" was very very rare for their old shoots.

The election season is upon us, I thought I would chime in on the thread. Ralphus certainly laid out some good points in both his posts. How does he post that fast? I wish I knew...

Anyway, how the candidates stack up on free speech issues is pretty clear.

Obama doesn't seem to care much about pornography and has initiated no obscenity cases. His AG seems equally disinterested. I don't see that changing in a second term. I will give him demerits for allowing Bush era prosecutions to continue to conclusion. He has not been courted by, nor is he beholding to censorship groups.

Romney has already given the high sign to all the major censorship groups that he is going after porn. He has been courted by them and he has made promises to them and is beholden to them. I think he will appoint an attorney general who will go after people in the adult business. There hasn't been a single Republican President from Nixon until now who didn't attack porn. That's not a very good record. History is the best indicator of future events.

If you like adult material, particularly the more extreme bondage variety, I think you will see some negative changes under Romney. Some of your favorite companies will likely be affected adversely. They will start to reign in their content out of fear of prosecution, whether there are any prosecutions or not. Since I have never talked to a fan who didn't want more extreme content, that to me seems to be a bad thing. Personally, I think there will be prosecutions in epic numbers under Romney.

One of the most damaging things done during the previous Republican administration was to force the credit card companies to dictate certain content rules concerning pornography. Unelected corporate tools are basically deciding what you can watch on your computer with some "friendly" guidance from the DOJ. It is a back door way to thwart the constitution and impose censorship.

The Bush Administration forced these rules with threats and promises. You can bet if Romney gets in, those restrictions will be tightened and expanded. I wont even get into 2257 restrictions, but if they start fully enforcing them, it could be very bad for free speech.

Anyway, that's my take on it. I know the people don't really vote based on porn or free speech issues alone, but it is something you should at least be aware of.

Some of us may disagree on politics, but lets all agree to still be friends or at least porn buddies lol.

Please get out and vote! Forget the hype and propaganda and try to look at things objectively. Long live the Republic!

Peace

Rick

Politics-I'm a centrist who'll be glad when the election's over. I may not know which of the two major candidates I'll vote for until I get in the voting booth. And that's all I'll say on that.

I asked didn't your business partner ask me who made my companies shirts because you had found a company in Colombia in her home town that could do the same work for less than half the price? He said yes he did. I say it's the same principle; he barks but what I do is small change to what Romney and his type do. So it's size that matters?? They got pissed and could not argue any facts beyond their FEELINGS.

Romney will go after my porn but I hope to continue in business and afford to go underground if necessary to keep up my GIMP.

Renzo Novatore "I've noticed that Kink (which is always pretty mainstream and tame, but even more so under Bush)"

Got to ask this question. I've been searching the web and rarely find "new" sights. So I guess I'm looking at tame mainstream stuff. Any of you like to share some sites that are not tame and mainstream? I have frequented and paid most of the sites mentioned here. I don't think sharing sites would violate any code of conduct.

I could never vote for Romney, whose views on women and free speech are out of the 19th Century. I could never vote for Obama, whose incompetence has failed to fix our economy despite his spending $6 trillion more than we have. So I will vote for the ONLY candidate who believes in smaller government, women's rights AND free speech -- Gary Johnson, Libertarian, former governor of New Mexico, who impressed in the first Republican debate, but then was not invited back because his social views didn't match the Republican's right wing.

See you all in a week or so -- after the site returns to what GIMP originally meant.

I have read several discussions on this site that have been intense and spirited but I do believe I have earned the "dubious honor" of being the first one to be called names. Thanks for the "honor" guys.

Two more day. As I watch TV this morning there seems to be one overriding theme, "Virtual tie, too close to call". I doubt this race will be called Tuesday night but I hope that it does not go much beyond Wednesday morning. One can only hope.

I too give a thumbs up to the scene from "The Flesh Hunters" yes in spite of the CGI. I have the movie and have clipped that segment and made several snaps as well. I also agree that the movie itself is very lame.

Baron von Folter

So I will vote for the ONLY candidate who believes in smaller government, women's rights AND free speech -- Gary Johnson, Libertarian, former governor of New Mexico, who impressed in the first Republican debate, but then was not invited back because his social views didn't match the Republican's right wing.

Coincidentally, I just read the penultimate chapter in the book, That Used to be Us, by Thomas L. Friedman and Michael Mandelbaum, and those authors argue America needs a credible third-party candidate for president. Not that such a candidate could get elected, but they argue a candidate with sufficient support could get the Republicans and Democrats to adopt more serious policies.

I suspect there are many Americans who agree with Eda's priorities (I know I do, but I'm obviously not American). Maybe it's time for a new alternative.

Alright guys, these discussions have detioreated the point where they have become impossible.

In other words, with all the evidence that's already been posted here against your guy, it's become impossible for you to defend your choice to vote for Romney.

When people resort to referencing places like the Maddow Blog, a leftwing moonbat, and the leftwing Washington Post's article trying to put lipstick on a pig...

Facts are facts; you can disregard left wing sources if you like, but how about all the hundreds of other sources that say the exact same thing about Romney's lying? In fact, the only place you won't see it reported is on Fox News.

And no, there is no voter suppression in Florida unless you count removing noncitizens from voter lists as voter suppression.

Excuse me...(clears throat) *COUGH*COUGH*BULLSHIT*COUGH*...sorry, don't know what came over me.

Dude, if you're really that blind to Republican-led states attempting to pass legislation that makes it harder to vote, you're either in denial or else you're like the proverbial ostrich with his head stuck in the sand.

They may claim it's because of illegals and "voter fraud" (which virtually doesn't exist) but we all know the reasons behind their efforts...to keep young people, blacks and Latinos away from the polls, in other words, the same demographic that mostly votes for Democrats. And gosh, what a coincidence that all these states have Republican governors!

It is time to "exit stage right".

Stage "right", I get it. See ya.

----------------------

Rick: Great to see you here, and I'm sure the readers appreciate hearing the perspective of someone in the adult industry. Obviously I share your assessment of what could happen if there's a change at the top. I think by now we can all agree that it wouldn't be good for lovers of extreme entertainment. Let's hope everyone gets out to vote and makes the right decision.

----------------------

Political discussion on the GIMP: Hopefully this is the end of it; I much prefer to talk about women being tied up than I do talking about politics. Hey, we get this every fours, but it's almost over now. Just a few more days. Hang in there, Abby.

Eda's point alluding to the size of government and the extent to which authority is delegated to the states have been the central issues that separated the two parties for 200 years. My experience with backers of one party has been that they want the government to be just big enough to fund programs that help them, but not quite so much to fund programs that help someone else. That is why wars such as Iraq should not have been put on the credit card. Only when the populace is as to tighten its belt can the true support for a cause be measured. Instead, we were told to go shopping.

Regarding third party candidates --- conceptually, it is a great idea, and if we could create a third party in a puff of smoke, that would be great. But I really cannot understand the idea of voting for a candidate who has no chance of being elected. "To make a statement?".... get real. Nobody cares. Have you really studied the two major candidates and decided that they came out exactly 50.0 to 50.0? If not maybe you should join the rest of us and choose between two imperfect candidates. Call it the lesser of two evils if you want..... whatever. The last third party candidate to swing an election (and History) was Ralph Nader. Who knows what would have happened had Gore won. But we can be pretty sure that 4000 Americans would not have died in Iraq and that the financial markets might not have been de-regulated to the point of absurdity... and almost collapse. Whichever way a third-party candidate may swing an election, do we really want that?

I don't know if Canadian would agree, but my sense of Canada and most European countries is that there is much more ongoing awareness of what the government is doing and how it works than there is in the U.S. Then maybe we wouldn't have quite as much dumbing down of the issues as we have just experienced.

I don't know if Canadian would agree, but my sense of Canada and most European countries is that there is much more ongoing awareness of what the government is doing and how it works than there is in the U.S. Then maybe we wouldn't have quite as much dumbing down of the issues as we have just experienced.

Speaking for myself, it's hard for me to know for certain how the awareness of what governments are doing compares in Canada with the U.S. But my sense is the frustration that some people are feeling in the U.S. isn't unique to the U.S.

In Canada, for example, polls consistently find that Canadians want lower taxes and improved government services. People believe this can be achieved by finding "efficiencies" in government.

Finding efficiencies, and taxing the wealthy, can help -- but not nearly to the extent many Canadians believe. The more difficult discussions tend to be avoided, as I saw last year when we had both a national and provincial election where I live.

In my view, the one significant difference between Canada and the U.S. is that Americans are much more fiercely partisan. Not that Canadians are non-partisan, by any means, but I don't think politics here is as divisive as it appears to be in the U.S.

The other big difference is that American politicians can spend a lot more on advertising than Canadian politicians. And I think the negative ads that run in the U.S. are more negative than the ones that run here.

What the GOP has done to this country is downright un-American, making people's lives worse, all in the name of partisanship. I have a bumper sticker on my car that reads Defend America: Fire the Republicans.

Just a word of warning, though. I feel the need to remind people again that any political posts to this forum need to at least partially relate to the theme of our site, regarding free speech and censorship. I did let this one slide, and I'm hopeful the rest of you will act in good faith and keep any political posts on-topic. I started this thread, but I have no intention of this turning into a political flame war with each side bashing the other. People don't come here to read that stuff. Can we all be bi-partisan and agree to get along?

Anyway, you might as well go and vote for Gary Johnson, as there really isn't much in the way of difference between the two major candidates outside of very peripheral political issues like the candidates stance in regards to pornography and obscenity. Both candidates are going to brutalize America's enemies into submission, whether it's with bombs or crippling economic sanctions that plunge entire populations into misery. Both are going to reward the insane gamblers who crashed the US economy into a ditch (like Obama did with TARP and with the appointment of people like Larry Summers to policy-making positions). Both are going to institute policies like Obama's gift to the insurance and pharmaceutical industries, "Obamacare", which was actually based on a plan from the right-wing Heritage Foundation back in the 90's.

Neither of them will do anything about women's issues, specifically abortion...there is only one doctor in Nebraska who will perform abortions, for example. Both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama will continue to accelate the post-9/11 "security state" with all sorts of limits on free speech, attempts to enclose and limit electronic data and the Internet, freedom of assembly (the "Trespass Bill"), NSA wiretaps, etc. that was initiated under Bush and accelerated under Obama. Both of them just engage in the same pathetic god-and-country patriotic bullshit.

Obama's supporters will come out and say that he did do some good things, though, like allowing gay people to openly serve (they won't have to pretend to be straight while slaughtering poor people in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, etc anymore), and his abandonment of a singlepayer healthcare plan in favor of one of the most corrupt instances of "crony capitalism" that I can think of (the Affordable Care Act). Fuck Barack Obama.

BDSM material seems pretty peripheral compared to that shit. Although if I was involved in any way in the adult industry, I would definitely vote my economic self-interest and go for Obama.

@bman: If you wanna see something that isn't tame, you'll have to search for less popular sites in USA or the popular ones in Europe. I suppose Kink is the biggest BDSM site in USA, so under GWB's administration of course they would have to fly a bit under the radar, although ever since Obama's administration started some of their devicebondage products have been top notch.

Anyway, the sites I'd recommend would be all from the west cause I know little about Japanese porn sites. Here goes:

1. Elitepain/Mood Pictures

Perhaps the most vicious bdsm site in the western hemisphere of the world (only because shadowgalaxy's product is somewhat dubious, at least for me). They really destroy their girls mentally and physically. It's not rare to see the girls crying or passing out, only to see the punishment continues. Their torture isn't limited to ultra hard whipping and waxing only, but also needle torture and pussy sewing. Some of their products are not for the faint hearted and the reaction from the girls are always real.

2. Paintoy

Consider this to be the US version of Mood Pictures, though I think MP is a level above PT, but that's not to say Paintoy is not worthy of your attention. Their tortures mostly consists of whipping, but very brutal whipping in fact. Ones that will leave almost indelible marks in the bodies of their victims. Top notch production for sure.

3. Modern Inquisition/Modern Interrogatio/Bathory Tales

Though their brutality, due all respect, didn't emulate the level of Elitepain or Paintoy, this inquisition production is merciless when it comes to whipping the bodies of their girls more than a 100 times per episode (usually in the form of full body whipping) and has what may very well be the best use of heat torture, wax torture, and rack torture in the west. Their product is usually accompanied by a storyline that includes the victims as accused witches and therefore must be punished for her sins. What I like the most from this production is, as long as its within their reach, they don't hold back on their torture. Pussy sewing & urine drinking are also under their agenda sometimes.

4. Paingate/Whipped Women

Just like their name would suggest, their tortures consist of hard whipping and sometimes rack. But what I like from this production the most is their creativity, in a sense that they perform their punishments to their girls are disparate positions and circumstances. Their whipping is also brutal, very worthy to watch. And, maybe it's just me, but their torturers really fancy breasts whipping and pussy whipping. And when they're done with their work, the girls can enjoy the sight of whipping marks all over their body.

Ralphus, I realize this is your forum, but apparently your idea of "moderation" is Rachel Maddow, because when it comes to politics only MSNBC and TASS lean further to the far left. :( It's sad and debasing to the forum. And Canadian has it right, big governments that regulate the size of sodas never stop there. They always want more, they are greedy mother fuckers. And if you think they're are just going to stop with censoring a denigrating video to Islam I have some real estate you may be interested in.

Interesting the Sec of State of the very same administration that claims "we don't denigrate religion" attended and cheered the Broadway production of Book of Mormon by the creators of South Park a few weeks earlier, I can assure you it was denigrating of all religions. Another rhetorical BS line for the President, whose been lying about Benghazi for weeks.

As far as Gimp goes, I just got a copy of "Rites of Passage" which contains a great and long AOH scene with the glorious Briana Evigan. It's well worth the price of admission.

I started this group for politics and other stuff and we have a few that like to raise hell. Everyone is on moderation till they post something other than spam.

http://groups.google.com/group/mudd-slingers

My Handle is BP and I approve this message.

The Obama vs Romney discussion is getting too hateful and way off topic for here which is to protect all kinds of porn or attack all kinds of porn.

Democrats has always been porn friendly and Republicans has always been porn unfriendly. End of story. Please Tuesday come and be gone already and hopefully the Democrats will win. Bill K

I have it somewhere in my library and will go through and see if I can find it, and the name of the movie it came from.

I remember the scene goes something like - the catsuit-clad people are aliens who have kidnapped a woman, stripped her naked, and bound her inside the teepee thingy to drain her life-force/soul/whatever. The picture is just as they are leaving to go find another Earth victim to drain. While they're away (because apparently on their planet there's no such thing as scavengers so they have no reason to leave behind a guard) a sheriff's deputy finds the woman and frees her. They run off Stage Right. End of the good part.

It may take me awhile to find that clip, as, like you, I can't recall the name of the movie either!

Thomas

*Spoilers* As soon as the cop frees her, she immediately goes running to pick up her clothing. The cop says, "There's no time for that, let's get out of here!" My thoughts exactly, but just the same she grabs the clothes, which are so shredded they serve little purpose anyway. Then, like a true putz, he gives her the shirt off his back. What a gentleman. Dammit. *End Spoilers*

Here are some screen caps.

Ralphus-let me know if you want a review.

Joanne, I say this purely as someone who visits the site every couple of days to check in (In other words, I have no insider knowledge), but the past month there have been major issues with the database, and the forum is still down, so I'm guessing those in charge are trying to get the site working again. It would be nice if they posted a message somewhere about it, though.

Ralphus-let me know if you want a review.

Even if Ralphus doesn't, I do!!!!

I really dig the curves on this woman.

----------

John Galt: Thanks for the tip on that episode of Hawaii Five-O.

I used to watch the old show all the time but haven't seen the new one. From the look of your excellent caps, I may be have to change my habits.

It's great to see another example of TV producers taking a chance.

But, being of a curious nature, I am now wondering if those sites appeal primarily to other men or if they cater to--hopefully--a growing female porn audience. Honestly, I haven't done any research into how popular erotica is with women, but it has always been my belief--based on nothing in particular except personal observation--that men are the predominant, umm, consumers of adult-oriented entertainment. It would be beneficial to pornography in general, I think, if women enjoyed it as much.

I also wonder if the femdom female sites, like Wired Pussy, Whipped Ass, Everything Butt, and Electro Sluts, have greater appeal to women.

I know we have some female forum members, so I would be interested in hearing their views. Is there growing acceptance and appreciation for erotica in the female population in general, or what? Is that why a trash trilogy like 50 Shades of Grey is a bestseller? This is your big chance to emerge from lurkerdom and say a few words. Opine, please.

I also see that Kink.com has added a new site dedicated to animated material (www.animatedkink.com) that looks to feature unpixelated anime and hentai videos. I saw at least one tentacle rape and what looks like a demon rape clip. So for any anime aficionados having trouble finding unpixelated hentai features, you might check the site out. I haven't seen any of these on Netflix streaming.

Speaking of Netflix streaming, I noticed that Trip With Teacher is on the current rotation. I reviewed that oldie but goodie, so if you haven't seen it yet, here's your chance.

------------------

MAV wrote:

Ralphus-let me know if you want a review.

What a silly question. Reviews are always welcome here, particularly anything with Cali Logan, who's a genuine doll baby. Tied AOH and tortured? I'm there. Drop me an e-mail and I can help you with caps.

------------------

Dan Hawke: I've seen some of Torture Galaxy's stuff. It's pretty nasty what those girls allow to have done to them. Bloody skewered tits aren't for everybody, but I know our mutual friend John Blakemore can't get enough of that stuff. I only wish they would introduce some sort of a nonconsensual plot into their shows so I could imagine this was being done to them against their will, instead of it being a Fear Factor, "How Much Abuse Can You Stand?" type of endurance test. I will admit some of their models are surprisingly cute, which you wouldn't expect for the type of harsh treatment they allow themselves to be put through.

------------------

A Canadian wrote:

I don't pay much attention to Attackers these days, but this release scheduled for December looks like it could be fun.

Boy, you're right. It looks like Attackers has channeled those excellent Prisoner of War movies that FA-Pro sometimes puts out, complete with spread-eagle bondage rape and electrical torture. Plus you've got upside-down dunking torture to boot. I've been largely disappointed with the previews I've seen from Attackers lately but this looks like a must-see to me.

------------------

John Galt (again): I doubt if we'll get much of a response from our female readers (I think we may have 4 of them) but my own guess is all the male sites that Kink has now are primarily geared toward gay or bisexual men as opposed to women. Much in the same way that Playgirl Magazine was actually read largely by homosexuals instead of horny ladies. Men are more drawn to visual stimuli, which is why they consume a lion's share of the pornography that's produced, while women are more intuitive and therefore stories probably have more appeal to them.

That's my own view as a heterosexual man, but like you, I'd love to be proven wrong by any ladies out there who are into watching porn. Speak up, we'd love to hear your opinion.

Joe X

Here are some images.

A naked girl strapped (or in this case "wrapped") to a table is one of my favorite fantasies. It's good to see that someone is still making efforts to keep this classic scenario alive.

I've got many new clips to add over the next few weeks. I've uploaded 5 and must have 10 to be official. I will be uploading more soon. Once I get this store figured out, I'll ramp up production. The latest update stars Alisha Adams, who recently appeared on Infernal Restraints.

I've also blocked spam from my Yahoo groups. Feel free to drop me a line, chat or share dastardly ideas. There's a few pics from recent and past shoots there as well...

We're getting so close to the end of the year that I feel like this year went too fast. It was a year ago that we released Maleficarum, we started production of Dead But Dreaming this year, Maleficarum was released theatrically in May, Barbazul went theatrical not long ago and now we just released Le Marquis de la Croix. What does that say about the year and our work?. Exhausting, that's what it says. So much work, so little play, even if the work itself is a lot of play ... for some.

During the premiere of Barbazul a radio journalist asked Jac something like "How do you guys do it? You released Maleficarum not long ago and you're releasing a new movie now. What's the secret?". He responded at length, but in short he said that there wasn't a secret at all, that we work as a small production company that earns its money to keep producing and the number of productions that we come up with has a lot to do with the productions we sell. The love you get is equal to the love you give... right? Something like that.

Amy and Jac are going to Sucre, Bolivia, tomorrow, Sunday the 11th, early in the morning, to attend the Festival Internacional de la Cultura where Maleficarum will be shown in competition with 11 other films nominated for Best director, Best actor/actress, Best film... it should be fun, right? The films selected were not submitted, all films are nominated from all of the films produced in Bolivia in the last three years. Something like 130 movies to choose from. One film competing with Maleficarum is Montana Interior (Inside Mountain) where Amy has the lead female role. It's a culture festival that shows the best of the best, arts, music, cinema, etc.

But that's not all. On the 16th Jac and Amy will be in Oruro, another city here, where Jac will be showing and discussing his film Martyr. On the 17th Sirwinakuy will be shown in Chicago. We were contacted by a festival in Brazil. They want both, Maleficarum and Barbazul next year.

While in Oruro Amy will be checking locations for two of her soon to be produced films and in Sucre, a beautiful colonial city, Jac will keep his eyes open for a suitable location for what he has in mind, another inquisition movie. But before we start any new project, we'll be releasing Dead But Dreaming, we must not forget that.

Reine Margot

The movie opens with a quick fight and knockout of Cali by Niki. We then go into the basement where Cali is strung up nude AOH. Niki slaps Cali then begins the interrogation which includes various (real looking/sounding) stomach punches, as well as hair pulling and a couple of knees to the gut. Cali, who is in amazing shape and naturally well endowed, remains defiant throughout.

After about 5 minutes, Niki slugs Cali across the face and then starts to work Cali over with the baton. This action is not as good as the bellypunching, but Cali does a good job acting before she's knocked out. Niki then breaks out the taser and uses it on Cali's bare tits and belly. Cali does a good job screaming and being defiant before using the pain to attack/knock-out Niki and break free (think Bobbie Phillips in Chameleon 3: Dark Angel).

We then see Niki strung up tightly nude AOH. Cali is putting oil all over Niki's body and fondling her which looks amazing. Niki is defiant as Cali starts interrogating her. Cali starts the torture with knees and punches to the stomach. Cali faceslaps Niki a couple of times to start, then starts with the baton blows. Niki remains defiant even as she moans in pain. After various baton hits, Cali goes to get the taser. Cali then jams the taser into each of Niki's tits and ass. Niki's nude, oiled body writhes great during the taser shots. After one last defiant act by Niki, Cali gives her a couple of more faceslaps, knees, and taser shots, eventually breaking Niki to spill her guts.

I was VERY satisfied with this movie since the girls look amazing (no implants or tats for you picky guys out there), the serious/defiant acting was good, the dingy setting was appropriate, and some great torture action was pulled off. If only I had inserted whipping (which Cali says she would do some of). I give this an A.

* * * * *

Reine Margot: You really do take some time to arrange your HTML, don't you? As always, your post was enjoyable and informative. I am encouraged by the public acceptance of your latest films, and I hope you all experience much greater success in the coming years. The forum pictures of the day, highlighting Le Marquis de la Croix really help sell the movie. Thanks for keeping us all up-to-date.

If it had been me, I'm not sure I would have had Cali remain nude when it got to the part where she was interrogating Niki. That looks a bit contrived, at least in the caps.

Overall, though, it's good to see the producers delivered. I look forward to your next work and the whipping scene.

Regardless, it looks like a nice little movie. As stated before, I'm a fan of Cali Logan; I think she's really cute, although I haven't seen her do any real hard stuff along the lines of your custom before. I remember being quite intrigued by this short video teaser on her website: Cali's POV

The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.

--------------------

A Canadian wrote:

If it had been me, I'm not sure I would have had Cali remain nude when it got to the part where she was interrogating Niki. That looks a bit contrived, at least in the caps.

You know, you make an excellent point. It's one of the reasons why I don't generally like women as villains anyway. But particularly in a situation where they had been the victim previously and are now "turning the tables" on the woman who attacked her. Realistically, it doesn't make much sense to have her continue to walk around without her clothes. Most women are going to be ashamed after being stripped and want to cover up as soon as possible. At least in real life.

I guess it's part of that whole bondage movie cliche where each woman gets to "take turns" playing the victim and since the first victim was already nude, why have her get dressed again? Bondage films are kind of silly in that respect anyway. They're made for the fetish crowd as opposed to people who want a bit a bit of realism in their fantasies.

What do you guys think? Surely I'm not the only one who feels this way.

* * * * *

Abduction (2009)

I was bored enough to troll through Netflix Streaming and came across a movie called Abduction, starring... well, nobody of any consequence. The premise is awesome. It is about a town that lures in hot young women, kidnaps them, and then sells them into slavery or harvests them for organs. They also harvest organs from guys, but who cares. Also, they rape some of the women pregnant and then sell the babies. And they've been doing it for over a hundred years, so they have it down to a science.

The movie is available in an Unrated version, but I can't tell if the Netflix version is that version or the R-rated version. It has nudity and rape and bondage. This has a lot of potential to be an incredible GIMP flick, right? Well, what this movie actually is is a textbook example of how to completely screw up a can't-miss premise.

We can start with the women. They are mostly unattractive and almost exclusively tatted up. On the bright side, there are some hideous breast implants to occasionally distract you from the ugly tats.

The women are generally in a drugged stupor or unconscious. The few scenes with struggling women are rare and brief. While they are being impregnated, they are unconscious and carefully covered up with sheets and have bags over their heads. I suspect maybe it was the same one or two women used over and over again, just with different colored panties.

Speaking of "colored" (bad pun alert), there's also a racist aspect to the movie. The townsfolk have to go out and find some black guys to rape the black women, because the white Head Rapist just refuses to touch black women. (That's where he draws the line.) This happened early in the movie, while I was still engaged enough to be paying attention, so it occurred to me to wonder if there was really such a big demand for black babies that they needed to worry so much about it to keep the business viable and profitable.

Anyway, first, they tried to get a Cuban guy to do it, but he just wasn't, you know, dark enough. (I'm not making this up.) So they hired some black rapist guys at $250,000 a year. Not bad work, I guess, if you can get it. And, on the plus side, with black rapist guys they can keep using the white women and still get dark babies.

Yes, this movie is not only boring and tasteless, it is also offensive.

But getting back to the GIMP, there was a standing stocks on display (with a woman fastened into it), but mostly the women were laid on their backs on a table topless. Some ankle cuffs were used. Some tasering and what looked like a cattle prod was used once or twice on the women. One or two instances of over-the-shoulder carrying. No gags of any kind that I can recall, although already I am trying to forget as much as I can about this travesty.

This was almost two hours of kidnapping and raping a variety of women and it was so bad, and crawled by so slowly, that I wanted to scream. I couldn't even make myself go back through it a second time in order to do vidcaps. Unattractive, tatted up women, bad acting (when there was acting) by everyone involved, lousy production values, bad ad-libbed dialogue or an even worse example of a script (take your pick), and the most boring excuse for kidnap, rape and GIMP that I have seen in a very, very long time. I cannot think of a single positive aspect to this film.

My recommendation is to avoid wasting almost two hours of your life watching this movie. Even if you fast-forward to what looks like the good parts, you will be disappointed. This flick falls into that category of movies where I subtract points for a potentially good idea mishandled in a cinematically criminal manner. I can imagine ways it might have been worse--although not too many--so I will grade this a D.

If you don't have Netflix, and I haven't done a good enough job of dissuading you, you can buy it from Amazon. Don't be fooled by the DVD cover. It suggests a far better movie than it delivers.

Models' limits - I've usually boxed myself in to what I think models will allow based on their previous work. I never saw Cali do a whipping scene so didn't ask, but she said "cool if it doesn't mark me up for days" when I asked her after. I'm sure she doesn't do hardcore stuff but think she surprisingly doesn't allow fondling anymore even though she did in the past.

Male villains - I prefer these too but in this case it was either the male goon or have 2 hot girls in the video, so I went with the 2 girls.

Cali still nude when torturing Niki - I thought about explicitly putting that she get redressed in the script to make it more realistic but left it open so she could decide. Who am I to tell a hot girl to put her clothes back on;>

Belly punches/blows - One of the reasons I wanted to put more bellypunching in this vid than other tortures is that Cali had an awesome real bellypunching history. Niki really layed into her belly in this vid with punches and knees (I don't think it was sound edited) so that worked out really well.

I totally agree with you that having the first victim stay nude and "turning the tables" has ruined many a good story. There have been a lot of stories that were proceeding quite well until they get to that "WTF" moment. Unfortunately, for me once that ridiculous point is reached, I can't unthink it... and I engage the "stop" button on my remote. I would like to know how many synopses for movies include words like "takes an unexpected turn".

So. I am reading in an Associated Press story that the "other, other" woman in Petraeus' life is named Jill Kelly --- "not to be confused with the Porn Star of the same name." Not familiar with either Ms. Kelley myself but I think it's interesting that the AVN star gets a shout out in a major wire story.

On the bright side, there are some hideous breast implants to occasionally distract you from the ugly tats.

That would pretty much make it Game Over for me, regardless of the quality of the GIMP scenes.

Thanks for putting together the review. I don't think I'll be visiting Amazon.com this evening.

One film competing with Maleficarum is Montana Interior where Amy has the lead female role.

So you've had Maleficarum out for only a year and already you're starting to corner all the awards at the film festivals. ;)

----------

John Galt: Thanks for the warning about Abduction. I subscribe to Netflix Streaming and probably would have fallen for that one sooner or later.

----------

Homepage URL: Nightmare in Badham County, one of the entries in the whipping scenes database.

----------

MAV: It's good to hear that your custom came out well and that you are pleased with it. Niki and Cali look great.

I'm not strongly against the victim remaining unclothed during her post-escape and/or -rescue revenge activity as some others here are. I suppose it depends on the context and how its handled.

In the case of Renee Pornero in Exitus Interruptus, after freeing herself she set out to kill her tormentor while wearing nothing; I thought that was cool and added to the exploitation quotient of the film.

As for Cali and Niki, I'm not opposed on principle to having two naked babes on screen for the price of one, as long as at least one of them is being GIMPed. What would make that work best, I think, is if the naked victimizer is in such a snit that she doesn't care if she's wearing anything or not.

As for Cali and Niki, I'm not opposed on principle to having two naked babes on screen for the price of one, as long as at least one of them is being GIMPed.

I don't know that I would be so bold as to suggest this is a matter of "principle" for me.

The issue for me is my GIMP scenes always have to appear non-consensual. I'm not too hung up on reality (I like fantasy scenarios such as the "Slave Island" films, and movie scenes that show teachers being forced to strip for their students) and I'm generally one of GIMPland's lightweights when it comes to severe torture. But I am a stickler when it comes to consent. Any GIMP film I watch must appear non-consensual to get a passing grade.

When I see two women in their birthday suits, I find it difficult to imagine them as enemies. Thus, I'm not sure I would buy into the idea that the action is supposed to be non-consensual.

* * * * *

Requiem for a Vampire (1971)

Requiem for a Vampire, also known as Caged Virgins and Vierges et Vampires, is a French film by Jean Rollin. It stars Marie-Pierre Castel and Mireille Dargent as two schoolgirls who start out dressed as clowns riding in a getaway car while firing pistols at a pursuing car. They lose the following car, but the guy driving their car is shot and killed, so they burn the dead guy and the car and make their getaway on a motorbike. The motorbike runs out of gas and they continue on foot. We follow them on their seemingly interminable wandering escape until they happen onto a castle inhabited by an aging vampire and his followers. There's a very brief fully nude lesbian interlude between the two girls in the castle before the vampires show up, which is an unexpected treat.

The story is a confused mess, both convoluted and illogical in the extreme. It is possible it is an existential statement addressing our seemingly confused and pointless (one might even say "clown-like") journey through life viewed as an escape from a reality to which we must ultimately submit. Or it is simply a pretentious 70s-era French film.

I will just focus on the GIMP bits.

At the 32:20 minute mark, we get a welcome respite from a long and dreary chase scene during which the three male henchmen briefly capture and hold the two girls down onto a stone table and sort of ravish them, but it's not a big deal if you miss it. Instead, fast-forward to the 39:00 minute mark, which is when the girls are finally captured and taken into the castle. Upon arrival, we are treated to three helpless women chained AOH to the castle walls. The three male henchmen each have their way with these women. There is clothes tearing, overwrought groping, overwrought nuzzling, manhandling, breast biting, threatened breast burning with a flaming torch, and dry humping which I'm sure is intended to portray rape except none of the guys undressed and there was never even a hint that any of the guys opened their pants. But still, it is a decent AOH assault on three helpless and eventually naked women, all with copious 70s bush (although technically I guess this would be Euro-bush).

The climax scene features a bat fucking, eating out, or sucking blood from the hairy bush of one of the women. I suspect it is fucking her since she appears to climax herself. I kid you not.

I shamelessly stole the preceding vidcaps from Movie-Censorship.com showing some highlights of the dungeon assault scene, specifically the bits trimmed out of the censored version. (There are several more at the website if you would like to view them.) All in all, the dungeon naked AOH ravish-and-rape scene runs 10 minutes(!), with a brief pause in the middle while the girls get bitten.

There is some exposition revealing the vampires' story, then the two girls are sent out to procure fresh victims for the vampire master. The next day each of the two girls dutifully seduce a guy. The really cute blond (Marie-Pierre Castel) gets her cherry popped by her guy in an outdoor sex scene that is kind of hot since she's obviously being penetrated for the first time.

The other brown-haired girl (Mireielle Dargent) undresses and lets her guy chase her around the castle until she bonks him on the head with a rock. So there's a fair amount of nudity from both girls.

The cute blond doesn't want to surrender her guy to the vampire gang. Her brown-haired friend, however, is concerned that they will be punished or killed if she doesn't, so the next thing we know (at the 1 hour and 18:00 minute mark), the cute blond is chained AOH and naked while the other girl whips her. (The first two sets of pictures below are also lifted from Movie-Censorship.com, by the way.) It lasts for 2 minutes and 30 seconds (with about 20 seconds in the middle when the camera pans outside the castle walls as you hear the impact of the whip and the girl's scream) and finishes with one of the female vampires threatening to poke the girl's eye out with a stiletto. It is a pretty decent AOH naked whipping and torture scene.

The movie winds down pretty quickly after this point. The henchmen get shot. The old vampire lets the girls go free. They run off in the end.

I was pleasantly surprised by this movie. It is painfully slow getting started, but the chained women being ravished and raped was a nice, lengthy scene and the AOH whipping scene was exceptionally nice. Of course, both scenes were shot in dungeon lighting, which was dark with a green-orange cast and dark with a bluish cast, respectively. The chained women's responses to being ravished and raped were lackluster, but the hot blond being whipped let out some great screams.

I will give this a solid B for the GIMP bits.

This is currently running on Netflix Streaming (the uncut version, as far as I can tell). It is also available as a recent Redemption re-issue on Amazon.com for $14.99. The image from the cover is straight out of the AOH whipping scene.

Jean Rollins was often criticized for the languid, dreamlike, and incoherent elements of his film-making. But your review indicates that in this case, his movie is worth a look.

Thanks for the excellent caps too.

----------

A Canadian wrote:

When I see two women in their birthday suits, I find it difficult to imagine them as enemies.

It gets easier when you've seen as many women-in-prison shower catfight scenes as I have. ;)

But your point is valid in this sense: nudity is supposed to suggest vulnerability; the one with clothing on is the usually the dominant one. Except in the vanilla bondage scenes, as mentioned.

I recall seeing the box for Abduction a few years back, and was a bit intrigued by the plot, but it came with a warning sign...it was on the same site that was also offering Bill Zebub movies for sale alongside it. Guilty by association? Or more accurately, crappy by association?

At any rate, it sounds like a badly-made and badly-cast waste of time, on what should have been a great idea for a movie. That makes it even more of a letdown. When are they going to let real GIMPers have a shot at making our own film?

The link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.

Then comes Requiem For a Vampire. I have seen this one, years ago. I think I took about 4 minutes of the AOH whipping scene with the cute blonde on my highlights tape. And I agree that while the whole film wasn't totally GIMP-worthy, there's enough naked eye candy on display to give it a watch.

Here's your link for Requiem: http://ralphus.net/reviews/mainstream/requiemforavampire.htm

BTW, I've updated that entry in the Whipping Scenes in Movies Database under its correct title. Check out the database if you haven't lately. We've got a few new entries in there and some have updated vidcaps that were improvements over what we had before.

Dan Hawke: Wow. What a story! A bit of everything in that one. It's a long read, but definitely worth the time. Very well done.

MAV: That custom looks awesome. Cali Logan is a name that seems to pop up in a LOT of different types of videos - everything from wrestling to super heroine to GIMP-worthy videos like this one. She, along with women like Paris Kennedy, seems to be everywhere.

As far as Cali remaining nude, that could go either way. In one sense, having her put clothes back on represents "domination". ("I can have my clothes back, but you can't.") But, on the other hand, why not just skip it and "get down to business"? Overall, I have no problem with the way it was set up. Well done, sir.

Stay well all

----------

Regarding Requiem for a Vampire, John Galt wrote:

...it is an existential statement addressing our seemingly confused and pointless...journey through life... [or] it is simply a pretentious 70s-era French film.

I'm putting my money on pretentious 70s-era French film; much better odds.

But it's good when pretentious 70s-era French films have naked babes and GIMPage.

Another Rollins film that I've seen is a supernaturally-charged story of rape and revenge, Les Demoniaques (aka Curse of the Living Dead). I believe the image below depicts one of the rape victims, but I'm not sure who the actress is.

So, while Jean Rollin's The Nude Vampire was filled with nudity, and had an intriguing plot with an ending that I did not see coming, it had no GIMP. Don't be fooled by the old DVD cover that features a whip-wielding dominatrix. The remastered Redemption version has a more truth-in-advertising approach. It is not bad for a 70s era horror movie, but a total bust for GIMP.

Next I watched Nude for Satan, which YikYakker mentioned in September 2012 but apparently did not review. So here's a review.

* * * * *

Nude for Satan (1974)

Originally entitled Nuda per Satana, this movie stars Rita Calderoni, who I have managed to never see to this point despite my appetite for Eurosleaze flicks. This movie looked like it was also going to be a total bust, GIMP-wise. There was a fair amount of nudity, as the title suggests. The movie is another bizarre 70s European horror film with a plodding and sometimes difficult to comprehend plot. For review purposes, I will focus on the GIMP bits.

At the 44:20 minute mark, the female lead (Rita Calderoni) is wandering around the castle when she hears screams. A fully naked woman (Iolanda Mascitti) is tied AOH with her arms apart being savagely whipped by a guy. Her body is already blood-streaked when we see her for the first time. She writhes and struggles mightily (and screams loudly) as the whip strikes her again and again. There is also a lot of jumpy camera work, suggestive of the violence being done to her helpless body. The whipping goes on for about a minute.

Then suddenly the same woman is sipping from a ceremonial cup, with no marks or blood anywhere to be seen, and lays back on a blue cloth covered dais. She mumbles and writhes fully naked for a while as two guys stand around. The scene builds to a climax as one of the guys works himself up and then plunges a knife into her chest. The close-up of the knife in her bleeding chest is very well done. It would have been better if she had been chained or tied and struggling in abject terror instead of writhing, but it was okay.

At this point the female lead, who has been witness to the preceding tableaux, screams and runs off, loses her balance and falls onto a giant spider web. She struggles there as a football-sized spider lowers itself down and crawls toward her, up between her legs. I was hoping it was going to rape her or something--because I am just so jaded--but all it does is slowly crawl up her chest until the male lead shoots it off with a pistol. What does it say about me that I wondered why the hell anyone would try to shoot a football-sized spider off the chest of a struggling woman? The potential for collateral damage is phenomenal. But oh well. The single redeeming feature of the spider web scene is that the woman is wearing a little black dress that rides all the way up to her waist so that we see her black bikini-bottom panties and long bare legs. Oh, and did I mention one of her breasts pops out of the plunging decolletage? She's fully nude earlier (and later) in the movie, but the partial exposure coupled with the spider web motif is enjoyable in its own right.

The spider web scene is intercut with a lengthy sex scene, lit in red, green, and normal lighting, and employing a kaleidoscope lens at one point. Indulgent filmmaking at its worst. Fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on your personal perversion), it takes that damn spider forever to crawl up onto her belly, and it doesn't do anything once it gets there except wiggle with her struggles. But she really sells the terror and helplessness, so it makes for a nice bug-themed GIMP bit.

That's about it for GIMP scenes.

This is another 70s Euro-horror movie, with all that that entails, but the whipping scene is notable and the sacrifice scene is well done and the spider web scene has its moments. I would give this a B for the GIMP parts. If you enjoy that 70s Euro groove and lots of nude hot Rita Calderoni, watch the entire movie and revel in the nudity and moody atmosphere. Otherwise, employ the fast-forward button to get to the GIMP gems.

Nude for Satan is available as a Redemption re-release from Amazon via third-party dealers. And it is currently on Netflix Streaming.

You wrote:

Next I watched Nude for Satan, which YikYakker mentioned in September 2012 but apparently did not review. So here's a review.

And a fine one it is. It also allows me to cross another prospective one off my own list, which is good because your review is much better and more timely than I could have managed.

You were very charitable not to skewer the film-makers for the lame fake spider. It takes quite an acting performance to react with panic-stricken expressions when confronted by this thing. But Calderoni pulls it off well. Of course, the fact that she is one of the most beautiful women ever created (IMO) and is falling out of her raggedy, skimpy dress kinda distracts one's attention from the bug anyway.

She was also quite stunning in The Reincarnation of Isabel, another wacky European horror flick of that era.

Thanks for helping to draw our attention to this weird subgenre. I think it's great that Netflix is carrying movies like this in all their uncut glory.

* * * * *

YikYakker: It was a lame spider, but most creature effects in the 70s kind of sucked, and especially Euro-creatures, so I let it go. You hit the nail on the head when you noted that Rita Calderoni did a great job portraying the fear and that sold the scene.

----------

Roald: Glad to hear that you're back.

Rita Calderoni looks awfully hot in those caps you made, but then I'm on the same page as YikYakker in that I think she's one of the all-time great babes. Her burning at the stake scene in The Reincarnation of Isabel is one of my favorites. She even looks do-able with that big ol' nasty spike in her chest.

I've seen Nude For Satan, at least in fast-forward to get to the good parts. The only footage I kept on my highlights tape was the minute-long whipping scene, but it was definitely worthwhile just to see that.

The link for your latest is in my Homepage UL above

----------------

Roald: Yeah, I see Tribute to Tarl is back. I submitted a request to join. But my question is why did you close the original group to begin with? I sure hope it wasn't because of those silly fears that posting vidcaps would send you to jail. I thought we had convinced you before, then suddenly you closed it anyway without warning. What happened?

At any rate, I'm glad your group is back.

John Galt, great review! The first chick is giving me jungle fever.

Hay, speaking of jungles... Check out my new release.

MaX CoXXX

greets Roald

There's your random thought for the day.

The Cannibals looks like a well-photographed feature, with some good-looking women. I appreciate the preview.

* * * * *

Netflix Streaming has surprised me with yet another movie--this time Jess Franco's The Bloody Judge. It is a movie I expected to find in the GIMP Movie Reviews, either in Mainstream or under the Jess Franco section, but did not. A situation I hasten to remedy. Here's my review.

The Bloody Judge (1970)

This Jess Franco flick, originally entitled Il Trono di Fuoco, stars Christopher Lee as the evil judge and the beautiful Maria Rohm as the object of his obsession and lust. It is yet another example of authority figures using witchcraft as an excuse to murder, rape and torture. This time the setting is, as near as I can tell, England at the end of the 17th century when William of Orange invaded and deposed the Catholic King James. But who cares about the history, let's talk GIMP.

I was unable to manage any screen caps for this movie, but Ralphus stepped in and provided me with copious excellent images to illustrate my review. There are also entries in the Torture Rack Scenes Database and the Whipping Scenes Database (unless these end up in those databases as well).

About 13 minutes into the movie, Margaret Lee, playing Alicia Gray, is tortured on the rack. There is no nudity. She is stretched and screams quite a bit, she is branded on the chest with a hot iron, and she is slashed with a knife. The scene lasts just short of 3 minutes from beginning to end. There is a clip of the rack scene on YouTube as well.

About 20 minutes in, Alicia is sort of burned at the stake. She is tied to a tall ladder device and we see her struggle weakly as smoke rises up around her face, but there are no flames and she doesn't really look like she's burning. Her sister pays the executioner to end her life quickly, so he whacks the support and the ladder device falls forward onto a burning pyre. It doesn't take a geometry genius to figure out that if a vertical pole of height x falls forward onto a pyre at position y which is at a right angle to the base of the pole, then that pyre could not have been directly under the pole to begin with. But the rising smoke made for a passable BATS if you have a vivid enough imagination.

At the 30 minute mark we are treated to a sex scene featuring full frontal nudity from Mary (Maria Rohm) as she rolls in the hay with her paramour. She has a 70s bush. The scene lasts about a minute and a half.

There is an attempted rape at the 40 minute mark. Mary has been led to an inn under false pretenses and the guy who brought her attempts to get frisky. There is struggling, she is pushed to the floor, she gets up and runs away, she is grabbed and pushed to the floor again, and she pushes him off and into the fireplace where he burns his face as she escapes. No clothes tearing and no nudity, just some rough struggling. It runs about a minute.

The same guy roughs up another woman, Sally (played by Diana Lorys), at the 55 minute point. He grabs her roughly and pushes her to the floor, slaps her, kicks her, straddles her and chokes her, bangs her head against the floor, and attempts to crush her windpipe using a plate until she tells him what he wants to know. No clothes tearing. No nudity. Another 1-minute scene.

There is about 30-second dungeon montage which is the judge having a nightmare. There is a brief bit where a woman's tongue is ripped out of her mouth, and another woman in a stocks, but the camera is just basically panning.

At the 1 hour and 11 minute point we start the Best Dungeon Scene of the Movie. Sally (Diana Lorys) is AOH whipped.

A few minutes later, at the 1 hour and 16 minute mark, we get the Second Best Dungeon Scene in the Movie. We start by watching the AOH whipping and branding of a fully nude woman.

Mary is chained to the wall.

She is released, and forced to lick the naked body of the AOH woman. She licks the back of her legs and her butt, the front of her legs, her hairy crotch, her belly, and her breasts. It is a 3 minute licking job, and it is kind of hot in a humiliation sort of way.

Also, if you watch this on Netflix Streaming, at the beginning of the scene it switches to German with English subtitles. Maybe this bit was cut from the English language version and some enterprising perv spliced it back together using the uncut German language version. Whatever the reason, it is awesome and besides, she isn't talking while she's licking anyway.

Immediately following the licking scene, Mary is forced to strip naked and is bathed in a tub, then redressed. The stripping, bathing, and dressing takes 2 minutes and Maria Rohm's lovely naked body is fully on view the entire time.

The final scene is technically a rape scene. Mary submits to the carnal desires of the judge in exchange for sparing her paramour's life. She starts out laying on her back, fully clothed. The judge slowly opens her blouse to expose her breasts. He fondles her toes and moves his hand very slowly up her legs, pushing her dress up as he goes. Eventually we get a glimpse of her bush as he continues feeling her up. The entire time we watch as Mary gasps and struggles not to cry in her shame. We don't get to see any sex, however, we just hear the breathing and gasping get louder. It is as effective a non-consensual sex scene as it can be with a passive victim and no actual sex.

That's it for the GIMP.

This movie also featured Maria Schell as a blind witch. Her part was inconsequential, GIMP-wise, in this movie.

This is an enjoyable Jess Franco flick, with attractive women and some decent GIMP along the way. A rack scene, a lame burning at the stake scene, a whipping scene, a humiliation forced lesbian licking scene, and a sort of rape scene that at least qualifies as non-consensual. Since they didn't have electricity back then we didn't get an electro scene, but we did get a branding or two, which was as close as they could come, I guess. That's not bad. I will give this a solid B.

This movie is available from Amazon.com. I did notice that the Amazon DVD and several of the reviews I looked up while researching the movie showed it as rated PG. There's no way the version I watched on Netflix could have been anything less than R rated, so look for an uncut version like the Netflix version.

Bill K wrote:"The Cannibals" movie review and clip is great but any self respecting cannibals should know you're supposed to BBQ roast your gimp alive.

Yes, the main cannibal fetish points are missing. Gutting, spit rosting... But I made damn good use of of $130 in short ribs! I am sure I'll regret naming the movie The Cannibals. But its a damn good movie if you like rape strangle or just enjoy watching some of the most twisted cinema in the world.

MaX CoXXX

Let's see - lesbianism, creature from the Black Lagoon, armed militiamen, outdoor bondage, strangling and cannibalism. At the very least, this vid should win some kind of award for best blend of the maximum number of film genres.

----------

Bill K. wrote:

...any self respecting cannibals should know you're supposed to BBQ roast your gimp alive...

Purely by coincidence, I discovered the perfect gift for that special someone in one's life whose tastes align with those of Bill K.:

----------

John Galt: Good lord man, yet another detailed review of classic '70s GIMPage.

So detailed, in fact, that it makes me wonder if the version I saw years ago may have been edited. I've got to get this in my queue and have a look.

Thanks for the tip.

Greg

* * * * *

YikYakker: That paperweight is cool. Where in the world did you find it?

My tastes are more towards Ding Dongs or were Ding Dongs and Twinkies and not cooked gimps. Hostess R.I.P.:-(.

The "The Cannibals" movie was more logically correct for has there ever been a true story of cannibals cooking gimps alive? All the true cannibals stories I read or know about the cannibals always raped and or tortured and killed the gimps before cutting them up and cooking them.

I'm sure there are true witches being burnt and cooked alive spit roast style stories but not eaten. Bill K.

I actually really like the BATS scene in this movie, even though it's clearly not very explicit compared to others I've seen. The fire isn't directly below her, but out in front of her, as you can see a little better in the enlarged version of one of your caps.

Every time I've seen a victim tied to a ladder in this type of scene, she's slowly lowered into the fire (ala The Conqueror Worm) as opposed to being tied to a traditional stake and having the fire set near her feet. After Maria Rohm pays off the executioner, he simply releases the ladder and it comes plummeting down onto the fire at high speed. So the result was ultimately the same, it was just much faster.

But what I liked about this scene were all the nice preliminary shots of the victim up there as the smoke from the fire washed over her face. She appears to be really suffering and resigned to her fate, feeling the heat from the impending flames that she knew would eventually consume her.

The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.

------------------

YikYakker: I totally dig the roasted chick paperweight! I don't have one but I want one. Guys, Christmas is coming up and if you're looking for that perfect gift, I think we've found it.

Who is the actress BTW?

i will upload in next half year day by day 2 or 3 moviealbums.

so i hope i can rebuild quick the old collection.

the best uploader with a great archive in old group was jesse davano:

if u read this post, jesse: pls come back, help me and let us rebuild the biggest collection of mainstreammovies in yahoo. :-)

thx + greets Roald

Title: Secret Female Investigator 2 (SOE-848)

Starring: Yuma Asami

Produced by: S1 No. 1 Style

Running time: Two hours and 25 minutes

Secret Female Investigator 2 is definitely a letdown.

Beautiful, ample-chested porn superstar Yuma Asami plays a super-hot spy who is held captive and violated in what should have been a great Japanese adult flick. But the whole thing is stagey and lacks tension. Everyone in the film is playing to the camera and you never get the sense the heroine is in danger. The overall effect is a movie that is sub-par.

It begins with promise. Yuma, who was captured in last year's Secret Female Investigator, is still being held captive. She is lying on the floor in a darkened room, dressed in a very sexy black latex catsuit. A chain is linked to the dog collar around her neck and her hands are cuffed in front of her. Three villains surround her and talk about how they want to continue violating her.

The action shifts to a hotel bedroom, where Yuma is standing near a bed. A T-bar that is linked from her dog collar to her handcuffs restrains her movements, and her ankles are also bound to a bar. A villain appears and forces kisses on Yuma.

The villain pulls Yuma's big breasts out of her top and over the T-bar. The villain then sucks on Yuma's boobs as Yuma squirms.

The villain throws Yuma on the bed and rips open the bottom part of her outfit to reveal her pussy. The villain licks Yuma's pussy and ass as Yuma continues to struggle.

The villain forces Yuma to blow him, and he then nails Yuma in different positions, including doggie and missionary style. The best parts are when Yuma is being tapped in the missionary position, as there are times she really looks helpless. The villain finishes by cumming on Yuma's face.

Some plot twists come next that are tricky to follow. Essentially, Yuma (who, I believe, has been drugged) agrees to work with the villains to infiltrate a rival gang. Wearing a red evening gown, she seduces and drugs one guy in a limo. She then gets back into her black catsuit to infiltrate the rival gang in its warehouse lair.

Yuma fights two villains but is ultimately captured after she takes a hard punch to the gut. As Yuma is restrained by one guy, the other one threatens to punch her in the face, but that doesn't happen.

The once-again-captured Yuma is seen bound in a standing position, arms over head, with her cuffed wrists linked to a rope from the ceiling. Unfortunately, her arms aren't bound straight above her head, so the position doesn't look too uncomfortable. Two villains show up and start fondling Yuma's clothed body. The fondling includes grabbing Yuma's ass, which gets spanked a couple of times.

The villains open Yuma's top and suck on her big boobs. Although the villains are clearly enjoying themselves, the scene is weakened by the way the camera is moving around, making the whole thing look contrived. This part is not nearly as hot as it should have been.

A villain unzips the bottom part of Yuma's catsuit, revealing her black panties. One villain lifts Yuma's right leg in the air, and he and the other guy resume fondling Yuma. The strings to Yuma's panties are untied and her panties are removed. A villain lifts both of Yuma's legs in the air and the other guy strokes Yuma's pussy with his fingers, and then finger-fucks her. Yuma responds with some nice squirming in this scene.

Yuma is moved into a position where she is standing on one leg, with a villain holding her other leg in the air, and a guy fingers her until she squirts.

Yuma softly protests as the villains show her their two massager vibrators. The vibrators are rubbed against Yuma's huge breasts and are then used on her pussy. In what is arguably the best part of the movie, Yuma gasps and groans as her body shakes. The vibrators, along with some additional finger-fucking, make Yuma squirt another five times.

Yuma is untied and moved to a bed. The two villains take turns forcing kisses on Yuma, and Yuma's left tit is sucked and her waist is licked. The villains force Yuma to suck them and Yuma is also violated. Throughout this scene, Yuma is not restrained in any way and the action looks phony. Each villain finishes by cumming on Yuma's face.

Yuma tricks the two villains and escapes, going back to the first group of villains. In the hotel room, she reports to one guy, who drugs her and knocks her out.

Yuma awakens on the bed in a new black outfit that has more fishnet designs on the front. Her hands are cuffed behind her back. The villain pins Yuma on the bed and threatens to choke her. The villain then sucks on her fun bags (through the fishnet design). The villain also licks Yuma's pussy and ass.

The villain cuffs Yuma's wrists to the top rail of the headboard, so she is restrained in a seated position. The villain forces Yuma to blow him. As Yuma remains cuffed in the seated position, the villain fucks her.

Yuma's hands are cuffed to a lower bar in the headboard and she is violated in missionary and doggie positions. The villain releases Yuma's wrists and Yuma is fucked in a cowgirl position (no more believable than it sounds). Yuma is forced to blow the guy and then unrestrained Yuma is nailed once more in the missionary position. The scene ends with the villain cumming on Yuma's face.

Yuma gets free by tricking the villain, drugging him, and cuffing him to the bed. She phones her boss and the film ends with "to be continued...".

My grade: C

There are some parts that are nice, such as the scene where Yuma is bound arms over head and is fingered and subjected to the vibrators. But most of the movie falls flat. Yuma looks amazing in this film, making the end result all the more disappointing. Secret Female Investigator 2 was a wasted opportunity.

John Galt - Thanks for the reviews of late! They're right up my alley. Some I've seen, but I don't remember the rack scene being like that in my copy of The Bloody Judge. Perhaps I should be looking for another version.

Greg Smith - Actually, the resemblance between myself and Sophie Grabol (who plays Sarah Lund in The Killing) has been pointed out. It's a bit freaky in fact. It's like knowing exactly what I'll look like when I'm older. I'm pretty sure the resemblance has something to do with my Danish ancestry, my mother looks even more like her than I do. Weird.

I'm glad that y'all are enjoying the pictures of Le Marquis de la Croix, one of my end-of- year projects is creating galleries of HD stills in VermeerWorks for each of the movies. Stay tuned for that.

So, as Margot mentioned, Maleficarum was screened at the International Culture Festival in Sucre, Bolivia. It was fantastic! On Monday the 12th another film that I acted in was screened, La Montana Interior. We had a great time with the director, Diego, after the show and there were some great questions for him. The press ended up taking a bunch of pictures of Jac and I and put our picture with the article about Diego's film. You can take a gander here.

The screening of Maleficarum was excellent. To start, we had more than 300 people in the movie theater. The organizer of the film portion of the festival (there's also dance, theater, etc.), Rodrigo, was incredibly nervous about the audience reaction. He had taken a big risk bringing this movie to the festival. He was standing outside of the theater with a pained look on his face for two hours. Jac and I didn't stay for the entire screening, but went to have a beer to calm Jac's nerves before the Q&A. When we got back Rodrigo was still standing there, more nervous because about 75-100 people had walked out during the movie completely disgusted.

Rodrigo's boss, the head of the Culture Festival, was also in the audience and after the movie, before the Q&A, took up the microphone and told us how much he loved the movie and how honored Sucre was to have us come and show the movie there. Rodrigo began to breathe again after that.

While we were waiting for the movie to end to go in for the questions, a woman came out of the theater. She was a very pure soul, uneducated, but extremely interested in the subject matter. She came up to us and said how great the movie was, really well made, but too strong for her. She recognized me as the actress, but had no clue she was talking to the director of the movie, Jac. So we all had a conversation about the atrocities committed through time by people in power.

The end of the movie came and another 50 or so people left because they had other events to go to, so we had about 200-250 people left for the Q&A.

I had one question about my subtext for my character and how it was to play a victim. Same answer for that one as in pretty much all of the vieos on my YouTube Channel, about how I had to get into a very dark place in myself to play Mariana, etc.

One viewer, a writer, said that he thought the production, acting, lighting, pretty much everything, was fantastic, what he had a problem with were the long sequences of torture. He was bored during those scenes and was counting the lashes. Funny.

Another fine gentleman in the audience asked if our intention was the sexualize the torture, because he saw it as sexy. Quite obviously this gentleman in the audience is a GIMPer. Jac's answer to that one was simple and true. He said that it really depends on the audience, that one person may be turned on by the torture and another may be bored by those very same scenes. The GIMPer went on to say that he thought that potentially sexualizing the victims was risky, because the audience might not view the subject matter in and of itself.

We didn't really have to answer that one because the next question was from a feminist in the audience, who absolutely loved the movie, and wanted to know if we intend to make a movie in the future about the torture and brutality towards woman that goes on in the present day. We told her we would think about it.

The best article came the day after the screening of Maleficarum on the 14th, you can take a look at that one here. They call the movie "Daring and raw". I was pleased.

The day after the screening Jac and I were interviewed for a documentary about filmmakers in Bolivia. I was very happy to have a chance to advise actors to put everything (everything!) into a role, and also gave advice to other young filmmakers out there.

Going to a festival like this with a movie like Maleficarum was incredibly interesting and we were treated with so much respect and deference. They even gave us a minion to show us around and tell us terrifying anecdotes about ghosts and fantastic happenings in the city.

In between all of that excitement we did some sightseeing, so here are a few pictures... getting out my slide projector and mixing up some cocktails...

Before I light up the projector, I also received this review from Illustrious horror writer C. Dean Andersson about my movie Sirwiñakuy, in which he compares me to Hitchcock. That made my month right there. Ok, passing out the cocktails...

La Glorieta, a possible location for a film	It also has a dungeon!
Posts = Possibilities	Hmmm, that's a deep tub...
This is going to be less comfortable in chains.	This was a fun idea until I realized this lion had been baking in the hot sun... I smell something burning.

Is that "electrician's tape" on the end of the rope holding Mila's leg?

Yes. It's medieval electrician's tape. Much in the same way that Jac wears a medieval men's quartz digital watch with an Indiglo nightlight throughout the film. They had those back then.

------------------

A Canadian: Thanks for taking the time to review Secret Female Investigator 2 for the forum. Yet another in the line of "sexy secret agent gets captured and sexually tormented" movies the Japanese seemingly crank out at will. Bonus points for casting the gorgeous Yuma Asami in the lead role, debits for not torturing her nearly enough. Not to mention the "cowgirl rape" scene which always smacks of consensual sex.

The direct link for your latest is in my Homepage URL above.

------------------

Amy Hesketh: And thank you for the illuminating account of your time at the International Culture Festival. I know filmmaking is a lot of hard work, but the upside is when you've done such a good job that you get invited to places like this to have it honored. When do you find out if you won? And are you going to have to go back there if you win an award?

You know you've made a disturbing film when 100 people get up and walk out in disgust before the film is over. Kind of a badge of honor in my book. And I got a kick out of the one guy standing up and announcing he thought the torture scenes were sexy. Naw, really? Give the guy credit for publicly admitting it in a crowd of strangers, although the haters had already walked out by that time.

So Dean Andersson compared you to Hitchcock? I know that's gotta make your head swell a bit. But honestly, I look at those pictures you posted and then take a look at a picture of Hitchcock...I gotta say sorry, I just don't see the resemblance at all.

The "The Cannibals" movie was more logically correct for has there ever been a true story of cannibals cooking gimps alive? All the true cannibals stories I read or know about the cannibals always raped and or tortured and killed the gimps before cutting them up and cooking them.

Spot on! If someone was really going to eat a chick, what kinda appetite would they have after watching her cook to death?

Gog: 3 of the girls are being raped wile being strangled!!! That's Ashlee. All my movies are searchable by actress & key word at the link above.

Good Hunting

MaX CoXXX

* * * * *

Amy Hesketh: Great update! Sounds like you are having fun with your success. Interesting that it sounds like walk-outs were fully expected at the film festival. Also, the feminist response was heartening. I enjoyed your tour guide take on evaluating historical sites for GIMP possibilities. You are a true GIMP Goddess.

* * * * *

Witchfinder General (aka Conqueror Worm) (1968)

This well-regarded historical movie stars the great Vincent Price in one of his best roles as the morally bankrupt Matthew Hopkins, a real-life "witchfinder" in mid-17th Century England. This is a tale with significant GIMP possibilities, but it largely does not deliver.

The movie begins with a lone workman banging on a scaffold on a hilly rise. A small crowd of townspeople make their way out of town and up to the scaffold, dragging a screaming and altogether unattractive woman along as a priest walks along reading from what sounds like The Book of Revelation. The woman is dragged screaming and kicking to the rise, where she faints. Water is called for a one of the townsfolk, no doubt a Good Christian Woman, just happens to have a pail full of water to splash onto the unhappy "witch," bringing her back to consciousness. She is stood on a stool, the noose is slipped around her neck, and at a nod from the priest the stool is kicked out and she dies immediately. Just in time, too, because her screams really grate. The titles begin over the image of her body swaying in the wind. Not a bad beginning.

We are introduced to our hero, Richard, who is a Parliamentarian (Roundhead) soldier, fighting against the Royalists (Cavaliers). He is engaged to Sara, the niece of a priest who, by virtue of being Catholic, is a Cavalier. The Witchfinder is also a Cavalier, but not a Catholic, and religion trumps politics in this instance as he finds the priest a worshipper of Satan. (This is a lesson modern American Republicans should take to heart when colluding with religious fundamentalists.)

Richard returns to visit Sara (Hilary Heath, nee Dwyer), gets the priest's blessing on their marriage, and takes Sara to bed (at the 15 minute mark) in a bedroom scene that shows nothing. He leaves the next day to hunt down and kill more Royalists.

The Witchfinder arrives and starts torturing the priest to make him confess. Sara comes running when she hears about it. The Witchfinder finds Sara attractive, so he suggests he question her at length in the privacy of her room that evening. Sara, who is no dummy, knows what is what and bargains for the priest's life. That evening (about 26 minutes in), the Witchfinder calls on Sara. The most she can get him to do is not hang the priest, but leave him imprisoned for the rest of his life. Or until political fortunes change, this being England in the 17th Century. She slips off her top and we see her bare back as the Witchfinder moves in for payment.

At about 32 minutes, there is a brief scene in the prison where a woman is chained to the wall and is slapped around in order to make her confess.

The Witchfinder visits Sara again, but all we get to see is his toady assistant follow him and peep through the window, where he apparently also becomes obsessed with Sara's body. The Witchfinder leaves town temporarily to falsely accuse and execute someone else in a nearby village. His toady assistant goes to Sara's house and attacks and rapes her in the field. He throws her to the ground, holds her down, and without any nudity at all, rapes her offscreen to the sounds of her screams. There is a man nearby who hears her screams and sees the attack and choosing discretion over valor, rides quietly away. This is at the 35 minute mark.

The man who watched Sara getting raped is waiting by the side of the road to report to the Witchfinder, upon his return, that his toady assistant has dipped his wick in Sara, and in the manner characteristic of judicial men in black robes, he blames Sara and orders the priest drowned and hung. The Witchfinder departs, God's work having been done once again. Richard returns and comforts Sara, they marry, and he sends her off to another town for safety. The story proceeds.

At 1 hour and 10 minutes, the Witchfinder boasts that he has come up with a new way to burn witches. His current victim, Elizabeth (Maggie Kimberley) is tied to a tall ladder and lowered slowly into a burning pyre set in front of it. The burning scene is well done, with Elizabeth screaming and struggling the entire time, until she finally catches fire and burns in a long shot. In a nice coda on the inhumanity of people in general, there is a brief bit after the burnings where the townsfolk are standing around roasting potatoes in the pyre.

By the way, this is the burning method employed later in the late 17th Century in The Bloody Judge. So now we know where the idea came from.

The final GIMP scene occurs at 1 hour and 21 minutes when the Witchfinder and his toady capture Sara and chain her to a dungeon wall. The toady repeatedly sticks a stiletto into Sara's back, looking for the secret spot that won't bleed because Satan protects specific body parts of his minions. Richard is also chained to the wall watching, and Sara is tortured to elicit his confession of witchcraft. Sara is then pulled onto a stone table and held there for more torture--a branding--except Richard escapes and hacks the Witchfinder to death with an axe. The scene ends with Sara screaming uncontrollably, presumably driven mad by what she has been through.

This movie didn't do much for me. First of all, Hilary Heath is a bit plump and I don't think she is all that attractive. None of the other women victims were all that attractive, either. The rape scenes are done well enough for a PG-Rated movie, but there is no nudity--not even in the bedroom scenes. The only notable aspect of the movie, aside from Vincent Price's excellent portrayal of a true monster, is the burning scene. It is fairly lengthy and is filmed well. On the basis of that scene, I will grade this movie a C.

This is available on Netflix Streaming, as well as at Amazon. If there is an unrated version, I haven't heard of it.

If someone was really going to eat a chick, what kinda appetite would they have after watching her cook to death?

Speak for yourself, dude! After raping her and torturing her and then finally putting her over an open fire to cook, I can think of no better way to get my fill than to finish her off. Besides, it would be a damn shame to waste all that delicious girl meat. You want a leg or a breast?

When Ralphus mentioned Conqueror Worm the other day, I didn't realize it was the same movie. I've never seen it but I have read a little bit about Matthew Hopkins and was aware of the Vincent Price film under the "Witchfinders" title. It's too bad it didn't live up to its GIMP potential but I'm not really surprised.

However, on this one, I think you're being overly hard on what is, in my opinion, a true horror classic. In fact, not just mine. According to Wikipedia, in 2005, the magazine Total Film named it the 15th greatest horror film of all time. In many ways, it was the father of all the witchfinding movies that came afterward. Without The Witchfinder General, there would be no Mark of the Devil, for instance, a film that was basically a copycat of this film. It also led to Franco's The Bloody Judge, which you just reviewed, and many others all the way up through Maleficarum. For that reason alone it's worth seeing.

I think it's definitely a good film, perhaps slightly overrated, but I liked it enough to buy it (on VHS) and I've seen it 3 or 4 times. Price is as good as I've ever seen him, giving a totally non-hammy performance and making his character a truly scary villain. The movie has also developed a cult following because its promising young director Michael Reeves died tragically at age 25 not long afterward, this being his only his third (and best) film.

If you're watching it strictly for nudity, yeah, you might be a bit let down. But I think the lead actress Hilary Dwyer is quite appealing and NOT fat, and the witchburning scene, as you correctly noted, is very good and among the best ever put on film. It's clearly the highlight of the film. I would give it a B at least, maybe even higher.

I was hoping to find the trailer online at YouTube, because that's really good, too. I found it, but they have a reviewer who talks all the way through it, but it's still interesting what he has to say.

And this is kinda neat. I found a foreign poster for the movie online. Naturally, they play up the burning scene quite prominently. I hope our friend Covers has a larger version of this.

And before I forget, the link for your latest is in my Homepage URL above.

http://daha.best.vwh.net/boiled/Fiction/baia.html

which like grilling or roasting a gimp alive probably never happened in real cannibal history but who cares for like the Sir Steven posted picture it is erotic to think it did happen. I like the breasts yummy myself. Bill K.

Amy Hesketh - Hitchcock huh? - I was thinking more along the lines of Jess Franco, a far more Gimp friendly director - in either case keep doing God's work.

John Galt - very nice review on "Witchfinder General" - like Ralphus I probably would grade it a tad higher than you, not for the Gimp content but for the overall tone of the film - initial reports had Michael Reeves dying of an accidental drug overdose - as more of those close to him spoke up the truth began to emerge - they stated this movie was his view of the world as a whole where evil was so pervasive and all encompassing there simply was no escape - with that view of the world it's not surprising he would go suicide.

I notice you made no reference to what I thought was a very good sequence where the chick in the dungeon scene at 32 minutes along with two others of no attractiveness are dragged to the bridge over the stream to get some Cromwellian water boarding - she and the reverend survive to be hanged although we only see the aftermath of the execution - a bit of a footnote on that scene - Reeves planned on getting underwater footage as the trio got the ordeal by water but when shooting time arrived the water level of the stream had dropped and he had to settle for overhead views - that would have been an interesting shot.

Stay well all

Also, if the actual movie had the scenes on that foreign movie poster, it would have been better. Chains and manacles are always a welcome addition to any torture procedure.

* * * * *

Sloth: Oh, was that same woman from the dungeon? Did not notice. She looked much better chained to the wall being slapped around. I was thoroughly unimpressed with the drowning scene because most of the camera work was long-distance or mob shots. I debated whether to include it but when I couldn't really get any compelling screen caps I decided to gloss over it with "drowned and hung." The actual drowning was anticlimactic, in my opinion. And, as you noted, the hanging was all of a short shot of the priest swaying in the breeze afterward. Plus, I'm not really much of a drowning aficionado so truth to tell, it didn't make an impression on me. That was pretty evil, though, setting it up so that drowning was proof of innocence. Christians are such a crafty bunch when it comes to justifying atrocities.

Interesting historical notes on the filming of the movie. I haven't read much about it at all, so I appreciate those details.

http://www.donnerpartycatering.com/index/video2/boilingpot.wmv

I tried to post two pot peril but could get it to work. Bill K.

http://www.donnerpartycatering.com/index/video/inthepot.wmv

Just add fire. Bill K.

You know, that reminds me of a Japanese movie that didn't quite involve the traditional boiling in a pot, but nonetheless always rings my bell. At the conclusion of Attackers JB-103, Asian cutie Minami Aoyama gets repeatedly tortured by being dunked in a steaming vat of liquid by Randa Mai. There's lots of steam and the water is clearly bubbling, so they pulled off the illusion extremely well.

A Canadian reviewed it a while back and gave the movie an A-. That would be a good one to update with caps. Here's an example of what we're missing.

http://www.donnerpartycatering.com/index/donner.html

If there's another good boiling pot peril movie clip out there I would think it would be at the Donner site but sadly I have not found any more like the Hydrophobia boiling clip there.

My guess is the boiling water in that clip was dry ice dropped into water. What do you think? Bill K.

A Canadian reviewed it a while back and gave the movie an A-. That would be a good one to update with caps.

That could be arranged but it won't happen right away. I didn't keep that disc, so I would have to get another copy in order to cap it. Maybe it's something I'll look into over the Christmas break (which isn't that far away).

My guess is the boiling water in that clip was dry ice dropped into water. What do you think?

Hard to say. I'm pretty sure they were really boiling her. You never saw that actress again, did you? Those Brutal Violence movies were made overseas in a foreign country, where life is cheap.

You never saw that actress again, did you? Those Brutal Violence movies were made overseas in a foreign country, where life is cheap.

And those directors were really talented.... because they had to get it exactly right on the first take. No chance for a do-over.

Hope all is well with everyone and Happy Thanksgiving to all!

John Galt: The Re-Animator is available for instant viewing just in time for Thanksgiving. Barbara Crampton is not tussed up like a turkey but she is bound and almost, umm, eaten in a classic GIMP horror scene that will never be beaten.

That kind of rhymed at the end. Great movie, I think From Beyond might best it though. Barbara Crampton is so damn hot! Definitely good enough to be eaten, figuratively speaking anyway.

A great classic!

I hope everyone has a wonderful Turkey Day!

Rick

http://www.perilousthoughts.com/content/charnel-pit/DevilsPlayroom.html

is how I like to see gimps bound and a very erotic romantic setting too. Kind a like a Gimper's dream date don't you think? Red wine and branding irons in a dirty dungeon with a beautiful gimp bound spread eagle at your mercy.

Anyways I thought this was one of Minos' best creations. Bill K.

But this is a day when we Americans do not dwell on what we've lost, but celebrate and give thanks for what we have. It's a party the whole world is invited to attend.

----------

Of course, one of things I give thanks for is this site, which continues to grow and entertain. I especially appreciate John Galt's reviews of Netflix Streaming fare, A Canadian's write-up of Secret Female Investigator 2, the many links and pics provided by other posters, and of course, the ongoing pictorial torture of Mila.

--------

Here are a few pics of Hilary Dwyer, who was mentioned in John Galt's review. Perhaps not the most sultry GIMPette ever, but sufficiently attractive to fetch a good price at a slave auction, methinks.

----------

A Canadian: It's too bad the Yuma Asami movie fell short of your expectations, but pics of Yuma in (and out of) a catsuit are always welcome and appreciated.

----------

Some here were intrigued by the roasted gimp paperweight pic I posted the other day. I found that image, quite accidentally, on a forum for hobbyists who like to design and handpaint miniature fantasy figures. If you go to this page and scroll down to a member named slannfrog you'll find that this is one of his works. Honestly, I have no idea if this is one of a kind or is made for resale...guess the only way to find out would be to get in touch with slannfrog himself and inquire.

----------

Covers Covers has been running a nice series of images from a publication called Dossier Negro. One of my favorites is below. I like the tied-to-a-wheel-in-shredded-clothing look, and the positioning of branding accoutrements in the foreground is a nice touch.

As for the caps of Yuma Asami, I have to agree that she looked great in her spy catsuit. Ultimately, I think I enjoyed capping that movie more than I enjoyed watching it.

-----

Earlier this month, I mentioned that I'm looking forward to the December release of the Attackers movie, JBD-157, which has the title that I think properly translated into English would be, Lady Attackers Hell 2: Mission and BDSM.

For those who are interested, the trailer can be seen in my URL.

It may be noteworthy that two of the stars of the movie -- Yuu Kawakami and Maki Mizusawa -- also starred in the CineMagic film, CMC-082, which John Galt described in his review earlier this year as one of the best JAV GIMP videos he had ever seen.

As for everyone else, I highly recommend checking out the page just to view those caps.

* * * * *

Sacred Flesh (2000)

This movie easily falls into the category of nunsploitation. I read one review that criticized it for having a weak storyline that provided an excuse to string together a series of softcore sex scenes. As I watched it, I suspected it was the work of a deeply conflicted Catholic working unsuccessfully through some serious faith issues, and not a few repressed sexual issues regarding nuns. It is actually a series of dialogues between church archetypes both real and imagined, discussing the wholly dysfunctional attitude of the Catholic Church toward sex. (Not that the Protestant view of sex is any less dysfunctional.) All that being said, it is also pretentious and sophomoric at best. It might be best viewed with the sound turned down.

I will be focusing on the GIMP bits, with the softcore bits thrown in for good measure.

19:00 minutes. Brief images of nuns abusing and disfiguring themselves. The best image involves self-flagellation with a bare bloody back and side boob.

24:00 minutes. Sister Elizabeth recounts the confessed lustful thoughts of Sister Sarah (Michelle Throne) that drove Sister Sarah to writhe around on the floor in and eventually mostly out of her habit as she masturbated. There is explicit nudity and spirited self-exploration, and it lasts for about 5 minutes.

31:00 Minutes.: The confessions of Sister Mary (Amanda Dawkins) and Sister Helena (Hannah Callow) come next. The sisters attempt to scourge their sinful thoughts away by whipping each other.

Instead, they get turned on by the pain and succumb to rampant lesbian sex culminating in surprisingly explicit 69 action. They are still mostly in their habits and I have to wonder if this is not every Catholic schoolboy's secret fantasy. This part takes about 7 minutes.

44:30 minutes. The confession of Novice Sister Catherine (Majella Shepherd) has greater GIMP potential, but still falls flat. Catherine the novice is convinced by Father James and Father Peter that she must experience sex first before she can fully appreciate being chaste. Accommodating churchmen that they are, they partially undress her, feel her up, lick her, suck her, kiss her and presumably fuck her, although we don't see that. (Or, in the overwrought words of Sister Elizabeth, "For them, her body became a vessel for their corrupt seed.") This part lasts about 5 and a half minutes, shows Sister Catherine covering her eyes in shame or humiliation, and ends with Sister Catherine on an altar curled into a fetal position crying.

59:00 minutes. The "blasphemies" of Sister Jane (Sarah McLean), Sister Helen (Nicole Bouchet), and Sister Teresa (Cassandra Bochsler), who victimize and brutalize Sister Ann (Anneka Svenska), provide the the GIMP climax of this film. Sister Ann rats out Sister Helen for masturbating, although Helen, Jane and Teresa are probably sapphic lovers so why Ann didn't rat them all out at once is odd. Sister Helen is punished, so she and her two cronies ambush Sister Ann and take their revenge.

They tie Sister Ann to a cross and undress her enough to reveal her breasts and fondle her. They open her robe and one of them straddles her and suddenly it turns into a lesbian sex scene, with tongues in full motion. So, not so much nonconsensual any more. To further un-GIMP it, her hands come untied so she can grope and fondle in return.

Meanwhile, to spice it all up, the three amiga sistas (heh) are all in a lesbian group sex encounter session themselves, which is confusing since one of them theoretically is munching on Sister Ann. It all devolves into a lesbian softcore scene.

At the very end, we do get a symbolic crucifixion scene that makes for good imagery but lacks any GIMP feel at all.

This film is mostly a fully illustrated sacrilegious screed against Catholic sexual repression. There are misogynistic priests, an old and ugly disapproving matron nun, and young and sexy wayward nuns. So there's your Catholic Church trifecta right there.

This is a hard movie to grade. If you enjoy seeing nuns going at it, you will probably really enjoy this movie. It was extremely rare for the nuns to ever be completely undressed, meaning you are always aware they are nuns. GIMP-wise, there are brief self-flagellation and whipping scenes, one two-priests-on-one-novice molestation scene, one bound-to-a-cross and molested scene, and a brief crucifixion scene. None of them really pay off, though, in a meaningful GIMP way. Plus, lots of nudity and lesbian softcore sex. So this gets a D+ for actual GIMP, although if you have a nun sex fetish then it will rate significantly higher.

This is currently on Netflix Streaming. It is also available at Amazon.com. It is unrated everywhere I see it.

Nonetheless, thanks once again for another entertaining and informative review and the fine work on the caps. I don't see myself being -- uh -- tempted by Sacred Flesh. It may be more polished than a Bill Zebub movie but it looks almost as silly. Not my thing, at all.

Bill K asked:

...is "Hydrophobia" still available to buy or rent?

Neither, but technically it never was. It was available to members of the website Brutal Violence, which is now defunct. Looks like the ending that you linked to is the best part anyway.

-------------------

A Canadian: I'm with John Galt on this one. The trailer for JBD-157 definitely looks torture-riffic. The excellent stills are one thing but having video to go along with them put me over the edge. It's definitely on my must-see list now.

-------------------

Obulious Toobach reviews Sex Wish: That guy is hilarious. The funniest movie reviewer on YouTube. My favorite part was when he commented back to the movie, "He's sure the man's a homosexual but he's raped 4 women." I've subscribed to his channel based on the links we've had here on the forum.

-------------------

John Galt: Another fine review. But the whole nunsploitation genre has never appealed to me. In fact, I'm not sure why that's even a genre to begin with. Maybe scores of young boys who were punished in Catholic schools enjoy later getting cinematic revenge on the sisters who slapped their hands with a ruler. Makes about as much sense as anything else.

Nuns are not exactly the female fantasy profession that get my pulse racing. Other than Sister Bertrille from "The Flying Nun" (How many of you are old enough to remember that crappy show?), I can't think of one nun I would want to see get the GIMP treatment.

The direct link for your latest review is in my Homepage URL above.

In the film's favor, I will say that the cinematography is sumptuous, the costume detail is quite authentic, and that was the most gorgeous collection of nuns I have ever seen. Maybe if nuns looked like that back when I was in Catholic school, I would still be a Catholic today.

But I would be a very, very bad one.

----------

Anyone here ever seen a the flick Alien Warrior (1986) aka King of the Streets. It's supposed to be about an extra-terrestrial hero who helps rid the town of drug-dealing gangs...or some such thing. But I found a few clips that hint at primo GIMPage, e.g.:

A factory-made rape and a clothes-ripping gangbang...

Wow, look at the size of that drill...whoa, look out there's a snake behind you!

Yeah, this could be some cheap fun; unfortunately, it looks like another one of those movies that is only available on VHS.

Well, all this got Vampi's attention. She sat up in my lap and stared intently at the movie I was watching. This is very unusual for her; even Animal Planet barely gets a reaction from her. But she kept on watching, all the way through that scene, then through another scene where the woman is tied spread-eagled and has hot candle wax dripped on her. This was followed by another scene where the woman is tied up and whipped again. And Vampi kept right on watching, her eyes never leaving the action that was unfolding onscreen.

Amazingly, over 25 minutes have gone by and she's still watching. The woman onscreen is now being raped. I had to move my leg and Vampi finally hopped off and walked away. Well, that's the end of that, I thought. Not so. She came back a minute later, got back on top of the couch and onto an Afghan rug that she often sleeps on. But not tonight. She sat on top of the Afghan and proceeded to watch the rest of the rape scene. I was half watching the scene and half watching Vampi's reaction.

Here's a question. I know these movies are for adults only. Am I being an irresponsible parent by exposing my cat to violent bondage porn? And how will it affect her future behavior? What am I supposed to do if she wants to watch another one and starts meowing at the TV? I don't want her getting addicted to this stuff. At least...you know, not as badly as me.

Vampi, the bondage-loving cat

Seriously sex rape noises humans or animals make may have been what got her attention or she's an S&M lesbian feline. Bill K.

Now make no mistake, this is no fetish flick, and like all thrillers, it tries to tell a story; in this case, a couple of childhood best friends are on the outs after one of them marries and has a daughter (we'll call him Friend A). Friend B doesn't like this, and tries to bond with Friend A over their shared interest: horror movies. This doesn't seem to come through, until Friend B shows Friend A a recent acquisition of his, ostensibly acquired through some obscure means and mailed to him. This video becomes a mutual yet morbid fascination of theirs, and this leads to that... and well, I'll let you watch the movie if you care about the plot. The content of these videos however is (surprise surprise!) the subject of this post.

The videos show various women, from various angles ("Gory Discretion Shots" abound in most of them however), bound (quite firmly!) with zipties to a plastic-covered table, and gagged with tape over their mouths (plenty of "Mmmph"ing). A latex glove-covered hand descends downward, sometimes rubbing their chests, while other times disrobing them in various ways (lifting shirts, cutting bra straps) and there's plenty of frontal nudity here; though nothing below the belt. Eventually, the hand comes back with a curved blade of some nature, and he begins slowly running it up and down their bellies, harmlessly, until eventually... well, you can tell where this is going from the movie's title.

If this sounds like your thing (no rape and no whipping or otherwise to ramp it up), this movie is definitely for you. If you're squeamish about gore or prefer your GIMPettes (is that a noun you use?) intact in the aftermath... well, I urge you to reconsider your acronym.

A few complaints, however. First of all, these videos shown are spaced out. A lot. It's half a dozen or so 15-60 second clips spread out across the entire 90 minute movie. Some are better than others; the first is merely a lower side angle shot where you can only see the side of the girls stomach, and then blood tricking down with assorted (and gradually higher in pitch) "Mmph"-ing. The girls aren't shown being bound: one is shown being given her gag, another is shown being given her zipties around her ankles and wrists, but there's never a full, uninterrupted sequence of bondage>teasing>peril. The piecemeal is my only real complaint, however. Otherwise it's pretty much exactly what I look for in a GIMP movie: bondage, anticipation, and (most importantly) PERIL! The only other complaint, though not as serious in the context of GIMP, is the ending: it is a DOWNER. I have an incredibly high tolerance for movies of the horror/thriller variety, but you'll just have to see it. A little too dark, in my opinion.

Anyway, here's the imdb link for those interested: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1506459/

Hope this suits someone else's fancy as it did mine!

Overall I'd award this movie a solid B+. It gets points for its build up, suspense, PROPER bondage, and moderate nudity of the chest area, as well as the realism and presentation of the end result (no exaggerated gore, but a few good and almost disturbingly realistic views of the process). It loses points for the brevity and spread out nature of these scenes, forcing you to skip back and forth to get a full chronological depiction.

Well, as it turns out, the entire frickin' movies is on YouTube... lol... for how long, who knows, but I put the link up.

The 'Alien Warrior' has a really nasty habit of showing up and rescuing the rather sexy 80s damsels in this thing, but the fun bits are at 11 minutes, and 1 hour and 12 minutes. The drill scene is actually pretty good, for the bondage anyway, although things get interrupted before they get 'good.' But, for YouTube this is pretty darn good!

Very good review; I've never even heard of the movie but now I'm eager to see it. The trailer on the IMDB also hinted at the good things to come. Sounds like the best way to view the GIMP portions is to watch the whole film and then edit the short scenes together afterward; I've have lots of experience doing that in the past.

The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.

-----------------------------

Sardu: Nice find there; I'm seeing more and more complete R-rated movies on YouTube nowadays; even Ginger is there completely unedited. I never knew about King of the Streets but that was a good scene with the topless chick and the drill.

-----------------------------

John Galt: Thanks for the Mr. Skin link. A few new ones in there I hadn't seen, some I had in my collection but hadn't looked at in a while. Some of those segments were edited quite a bit, especially Spun since Chloe Hunter is naked and handcuffed in several scenes throughout the movie. Good stuff.

RL5 - I'd seen the trailer for "Gut" and didn't know quite what to make of it - thanks for the review and I'll have to check that one out.

Stay well all

Clearly, the uploader knows talent and good looks when he sees it.

What kills me is that when I was finishing up the Electro-Shock Database, I uploaded what I thought was a segment from an old out-of print movie (Lies) but hit the wrong segment on my DVD by mistake, which turned out to be Wrong Turn 4, at the time a fairly recent release. And literally within 2 minutes, I got an e-mail from YouTube saying this video was the property of Fox and threatening to terminate my account. I had already just deleted the video anyway, but I wondered how the hell they could have caught that so fast. I figure I must be on their "naughty" list since they had removed one of my videos earlier for "nudity and/or sexual content" (it had neither).

So they watch everything I upload like hawks now. I even got a notice from them immediately after I uploaded my super-8 home movie Dusty the Wonder Dog that it had "matched third party content" because I had the William Tell Overture playing as part of the soundtrack. Can you believe that? At least they didn't delete that video!

Well, this guy who uploaded BSF must not be on their "naughty list" like me, even though they deleted his movie the first time. I wonder how people like that are able to fly under the radar?

---------------------

bluetylerrose: I checked and my local video store has a copy of Rites of Spring, so I'm off to rent it out now. That is a nice box cover. I was surprised it was still in stock. Netflix also has it for streaming, but I hate watching movies that way if I can avoid it.

Your point about how the GIMP moments are delivered in a piecemeal fashion makes me think the movie may not be to my liking. I could handle the gore (I think) but I suspect the brief nature of each GIMP moment wouldn't do much for me.

I'd rather know what Japanese sex video could possibly keep a cat interested that long, that didn't involve a mouse in some way.

- First, the rebooted Girls of War starring hottie Cali Danger is supposed to be released soon, maybe this weekend. Trailer shows Cali tied spreadeagle and other ways in bra and panties and tortured!

-Pics from a new 2013 series "Abducted" show Cali getting chained up AOH also in bra and panties

Woo Hoo!

----------------------------------------------------------------

I recently watched a movie I'd only heard of on this board: Asphyxia: The Movie, by PKF Studios. Anyway, normally "death fetish" isn't my thing at all, but I do really like a well conceived and executed damsel in distress fantasy, and judging from the preview it looked like it fit that bill, so I decided to give it a view, and give it a review since it was made known to me here.

The film starts with a bunch of dudes walking into a room with a weapon wall like Call of Duty or something, and grabbing a bunch of guns, plus a baseball bat for some reason (which never actually makes an appearance in the film). Cut to a group of young women about to go out for a night on the town. Their plans are cut short though by a home invasion/kidnapping. Only one of the girls is really wanted for the abduction, but they all get bound (two of them get their hands tied behind their backs with rope; the rest get cuffed behind the back) and gagged (except for one! Couldn't the bad guys remember one more gag?!) They all submit a bit too easily, would've been better if one of them panicked and had to be slapped or threatened further or something. They all get led down into a primitive, rebar constructed jail cell. I like cells in GIMP material, so this was good.



Our heroes demand ransom, but instead a "superheroine" team is sent to rescue the girls. Not a good part in the movie IMO...personally I've never understood the "superheroine" subgenre of bondage films, it's just something that's never appealed to me in the slightest. Our female heroes all look like stereotypical porn stars, so that doesn't exactly help.

But they all get captured thankfully, and their captors decide to make an example of them by killing them off. They all get stripped, one gets garroted (no bondage), one gets hung upside down and bagged (while handcuffed) and one gets hanged (while handcuffed). They all do a pretty good job acting, but the scene with the red-haired girl is my favorite, as she thrashes around and alternately curses and pleads with her captors, who respond by groping and mocking her.



A normal gang of criminals probably would've just shot everybody else and called it a day....especially since they don't really seem to be concerned about loud noises. Not these doofuses, though. Their schedule is open! The rest of the bitches need to go, and one by one they get dragged out of the cell, stripped naked, and executed in various ways, all of which involve asphyxiation. None of them get tortured (unless you want to count getting handcuffed and raped with a dildo as torture, which is what happens to the black haired girl), which is too bad as I prefer torture and torment to death.

One girl gets garroted (not in bondage), one girl gets strangled manually (not in bondage), one girl gets strapped down to a chair and bagged, one girl gets strangled with a rope (not in bondage), and one girl gets shackled to an X-frame and garroted. I especially liked the last scene, with the cute brunette on the X-frame. I know I said that death and "death fetish" wasn't really my thing, but I'd be lying if I said that her getting garroted while pinned spread-eagle to that frame wasn't erotic.





After all the girls suffer undeserved fates, the goons take liberties with the corpses. Didn't watch this part because it doesn't really appeal to me at all. I skipped through it a bit for this review, like I said before, dead women don't interest me in the slightest, someone else's interest in this may vary I guess.

This was the first and only PKF film I've ever watched, and I was impressed. The action in the film was non-consensual, and the young women who acted in the film did a surprisingly good job, I thought. There was no monotone pleading or anything like that and all of the performers put varying amounts of effort into selling their roles. That alone makes it worthy or praise IMO. There was some bondage but not enough for my tastes, plus there wasn't really any torture. Despite all that, though, this was a well-acted, appropriately mean-spirited "damsel in distress"-type film, and for that I give it an A.

GIMP related news from ringdivas:

- First, the rebooted Girls of War starring hottie Cali Danger is supposed to be released soon, maybe this weekend. Trailer shows Cali tied spreadeagle and other ways in bra and panties and tortured!

-Pics from a new 2013 series "Abducted" show Cali getting chained up AOH also in bra and panties

Woo hoo!

The women are certainly attractive, but I'm confused by that site. Is there any nudity in those two films? I see some of the Asian wrestling stuff has nudity, but most of the other stuff doesn't. That said, "Jungle Girls" looks interesting.

Yes, PKF does do good work, although I usually associate PKF with John Marshall. This is solely a MaX CoXX production, filmed by his production company under the PKF label. I filed your review under the Dirty Deeds category, although I'll admit I'm not sure how that whole thing works, being under different labels. Maybe I should switch them all to PKF.

Anyway, I've seen the movie and share most of your opinions. I'm not especially enamored by snuff scenes, like you I simply prefer to see them suffer, although I have no problems with taking it all the way sometimes.

Not all the scenes worked in my opinion, mainly because some of the women were such tattooed freakgirls I couldn't care about what happened to them. But 2 scenes stood out for me as quite good and will go on my highlights compilation. One was the chick who got strapped to a chair and was forced to endure the fucking machine, which I thought was well done.

And the final scene, which you and I agree was the best scene of the film, with the brunette cutie strapped to the X-frame and slowly strangled to death. Once again it was casting, in this case good casting, that made this scene work so well. I never got the actress' name but she was very appealing. When I highlighted this film on the board a few months back, she was the one who got the lion's share of attention at the top of the site. Yeah, I liked her a lot.

So while it was too much of a mixed bag to give it an A like you did, it had enough good scenes that it was worth getting, IMO. This was a worthwhile production from Mr. CoXXX.

The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.

Regarding Mr. Coxxx's stable of models, there are definitely a lot of tattoo freakygirls in his rotation. Maybe that's because he's heavily inked as well. I don't know. But I do know that he also has a few very attractive "clean cut" girls as well. Olive is a favorite of mine and I'm a bit disappointed she wasn't included in this, as she has some of the most expressive eyes (and nice rack) for being spreadeagled and slowly choked to death. I'm hoping - no, I'm begging - for her to do a crucifixion scene that ends with a hanging (say, with a noose tied to the top so she has to hold herself up?).

Olive, Sammi Jo, Hunter/Rose, and Rilynn are three of the better ones Max Coxxx has used. He also had a petite blonde named Erika that he bound to the X and bagged that was a hot video to get. Now that he's started using plots, maybe some of the more normal-looking girls will see it as an acting gig instead of a porn gig and the quality will go up. In fact, here's a script idea that would be cheap and easy to do:

Two girls are approached and asked to sign a petition to save the animals from medical experiments. The girls sign eagerly with their names and addresses. After they sign, the two canvassers thank the girls for donating their bodies to medical science so that they don't have to use animals anymore. The girls are surprised at what they've signed, but the men are prepared and use chloroform-soaked rags to knock them out.

The two girls wake up naked and chained. One is bound to the X while the other is bound to the chair and forced to watch as a "vaginal probe" is inserted into her friend's pussy. The girls are told that this is to "monitor their body's vital signs". Then, the girl on the X is poked with a Wartenberg wheel (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wartenberg_wheel) to test her skin's "neural sensitivity". The "doctors" make some notes and then bag her to see how long she can last before she passes out. When she collapses, the bag is removed but the girl is left chained to the X.

Next, the girl in the chair gets a vaginal probe inserted into her. She's subjected to electrical shocks of increasing intensity to test her "epidural reflexes". The doctors make some notes, then a bag is placed over her head until she passes out.

Fade to black.

The two girls wake up back at their apartment, wondering if it was all just a dream. One of them scratches at her arm and sees "Patient XXX001" written there. The other girl has "Patient XXX002" written on her arm. A note nearby thanks them for their contribution and tells them that the laboratory will be back for further testing soon.

FIN. Submit for Oscar consideration. Thoughts?

Renzo: That is the 1st "A" I got in my whole life! Whoo Hoo! Great review. I love the part about my actors being doofuses. That bunch so is. lol. They try hard though. Thank you very much. I really put a lot of effort into some productions & that one is one of those. Kinda practices us for a real movie some day.

Asphyxia: The Movie

Ralphus: I'll admit I'm not sure how that whole thing works, being under different labels

We are 2 different production companies that collaborate on some productions.

I also have a special going on right now on MaX CoXXX $10 a month for life for the 1st 100 members!

Good Hunting

MaX CoXXX

Don't forget Allie James, Tiffany Fox, Alisha Adams, Riley Teagon &&&&!!! Olive is my new HC star. Great scenes to cum with her. It really is all about the girls. I spend countless hours weekly trying to find new talent. Locals are preferable but the porn girls are normally a easy book & show up with basic skills. And yes I try hard to get no tattoos girls.

I like your treatment. I used one of those "Wartenberg wheels" on the inside of Alisha Adams pussy. I spread it with a speculum & ran it all up in her. Good stuff.

Thanks again all for the good words.

MaX

@bluetylerrose-thanks for the lead on Rites of Spring. Tight AOH but (SPOILER) the quick cuts to the forearms dont qualify as torture for me. That sheephead on the nude AOH girl and not showing the hot villainess were bummers too.

@Max Coxxx - Hey, if you can use that plot, go for it! You could probably shoot two endings - one where the girls wake up in their apartment (or out on the street or alley), and one ending where they actually die and get necro-sexed by the "doctors". Include the second ending as a "bonus feature" so people could interpret the movie as they see fit.

As for my crux idea, here's a quickie plot outline:

As part of a medical experiment, a woman is chained naked to the cross with a noose/garrot around her neck. The end of the rope is tied to the top of the cross. As long as she can hold herself up, she can breathe. If she gets tired and slumps down, the noose/garrot tightens and she chokes. The experiment is to see how long the subject can last before she expires. PKF has done variations of this before, with Scarlet in "Hanging Peril", and the cross has been used before, too. But, the two have never been used together.

Good call on Alisha Adams! I forgot about her. As for the others you named, they didn't ring a bell. If they were in "Asphyxia", which ones were they? The brunette who gets garroted against the post was kind of cute (even with the rockabilly tats) and so was the dirty blonde strapped in the chair (sorry I don't know her name) and the girl at the end definitely had it all going on.

I'm surprised you were able to get so many girls in one film, but it certainly worked out! Eventually I'll write a full review, but for now I'll say my favorite parts were:

1. The girl garroted on the X frame (should've been longer, it was that good).

2. The dirty blonde strapped to the chair.

3. The brunette garrotted against the post (although I would've liked to have seen her hands handcuffed behind the post for a more "helpless" vibe).

4. Superhero pink-haired girl upside down and bagged.

5. Superhero blonde girl lifted off the floor and hanged. The urine trail down the leg was a nice touch of realism not often seen in these types of films.

6. The goon in the green jacket going "Shhh...Shhh" when the girls were being tortured. Reminded me of the scene in "Saving Private Ryan" when the German soldier is slowly stabbing Private Mellish and going "Shhh... Shhhh" to comfort him at the same time. Creepy psycho stuff!

Which brings me to another story idea.

Speaking of creepy guys, why not a torture-bondage-horror film where a girl spy is bound to the T frame (or X frame or Arms Overhead or spreadeagled) and a torturer is asking her to reveal some secret plan or something. A bag is placed over her head until she passes out. Then she's revived and asked again. She refuses and the creepy torture guy says something like "I'm not a bad person. I don't want to hurt you. Why don't you cooperate?" And then the bag goes over her head again until she passes out. She's revived and he says, "It's a shame to destroy such a beautiful body. Why don't you tell me what I want to know?"

She refuses to cooperate and the bag goes on again until she passes out. Again she's revived and she starts to cry. He says, "Oh, please don't cry. You'll ruin your make-up, and you did such a wonderful job of it. Why won't you tell me what I want to know?" Again the bag goes over her head until she passes out. She's revived, and the creepy guy says, "I'm afraid I've lost my patience with you. We captured your friend and she's next, so I have to move this along."

The girl starts to freak out as the bag goes over her head one last time. The man does the "Shhh... Shhhh" bit and says, "Don't worry. You won't feel a thing. You'll just slip quietly into eternal sleep." She struggles and passes out and after confirming she's dead, the man presses a button. A guard walks in and the man says, "I'm done with her. She's all yours." The guard then unties her body, flops her on the floor and does the necro-sex thing.

FIN. Another Oscar candidate.

You cheer for the torturer and the evil gimp gets what she deserves. Bill K.

Rilynn & Allie..... They are both so great to work with. When a girl really trys hard, it's sexy. Period.

Skullchaser wrote: Hey, if you can use that plot, go for it! You could probably shoot two endings - one where the girls wake up in their apartment (or out on the street or alley), and one ending where they actually die and get necro-sexed by the "doctors". Include the second ending as a "bonus feature" so people could interpret the movie as they see fit.

Most of my BDSM has been shot with multi endings for billing purposes. We shoot a lot of multi endings for Superhero & other types of video we produce without a death.

Check out my new GIMP worthy flick.

Good Hunting

MaX CoXXX

Some other Max Coxxx titles to consider which I thought were well done are "Ellorie's Crux" and "Thou Shall Not Be Hot" both of which have a crux motif with no strangulation and no death scenes. The best choking scenes belong to Olive on her first film where she is bound to the X frame and roped, shocked and then bagged. Erika on the X is another good one - very tight body, no tats, and has that "sorority girl" look that works well. She gets bagged at the end as well.

Also anything with Sammi Jo is worth a look at least once.