I would offer a comment on today's pic so as to break the drought. But for some reason, the words just aren't coming.

But then, I do have that secret dungeon...

----------

Mystery Movie: Well, the bad news is that as yet no one has identified my nameless movie.

The good news is that it doesn't matter - I found the movie title and the name of the actress myself. After exhaustive research - well, actually it was just plain dumb luck - I stumbled upon it while looking for something else.

But I must issue an apology: My description of the scene was conflated with a scene from another movie, so I gave you all some incorrect information. Here are the accurate clues:

~ The time period is not early 20th century, but late 19th century
~ The sweet young thing is actually a prostitute
~ The scenario is a police investigation of a suspected killer
~ The movie is not in our database

Someone will surely identify the mystery movie now. But if no one does, I will reveal it this weekend.

In the meantime, if you want more clues, post a question (one per poster). Just don't ask for the name of the movie or the actress - those you'll have to come up with yourselves.

How about a film review to liven up some debate? Following it's recent DVD release, I managed to see David Cronenberg's latest effort this week, and (pause for effect), it contains some GIMP-age! Involving English rose Keira Knightley!

The film in question is A Dangerous Method.

A brief precis of the film is that it covers the relationship between the two 'Fathers' of modern psychology, Sigmund Freud (Viggo Mortensen) and Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender), and Jung's affair with one of his patients, Sabina Spielrein (Keira Knightley). The film opens with the deranged Russian Spielrein arriving at Jung's clinic for his 'talking cure'. Now I am a big admirer of Miss Knightley, but her performance in this film is infuriating. For a start, she persists in adopting a cod Russian accent (the other characters, one Austrian, one Swiss, do not affect any accents). Secondly, her portrayal of deranged consists of sticking out her lower jaw and gurning stupidly. Fortunately, after treatment, her condition improves, and the gurning decreases. Jung is rather taken with Miss Spielrein, to the point of encouraging her to study and become a psychologist herself, and taking her on both as an assistant and as a mistress. The psychological breakthrough comes when Miss Spielrein admits to abuse by her Father, and that she can only become sexually aroused when she is humiliated and beaten. Naturally, Jung is happy to oblige, and we are treated to scenes of her being spanked (with a hand)

and also with her hands tied and whipped with a belt

Both scenes involving brief topless nudity.

The other 'GIMP' worthy scene is after Miss Spielrein has an 'episode' and runs into a pond. She is hauled out, covered in mud, and is forcibly bathed, which is quite a nice scene

Before you start thinking that this is a 'GIMP' film, it is not really. I am a big Cronenberg fan, but this is only really a moderate film in his pantheon, easily eclipsed by his previous effort, 'Eastern Promises', which really was a superb film. Keira Knightley's performance is pretty dreadful really; and only sterling performances by the male leads Fassbender and Mortensen save the film - they really are excellent

All in all I would rate this film as a C purely in film terms, and also as a C for the very brief moments of GIMP-age. So, recommended only for Keira Knightley fans who would get off on scenes of her spanked whilst topless (which I would guess might well be quite a few people!).

Ralphus, Here is an Ariel porn shoot I found.

http://www.youporn.com/watch/562006/metart-model-ariel/

If you remember the debate on if Ariel's breasts were enhanced or real at SDamsels forum shows I think clearly they for real. What do you think? Also I remember you saying she one of your favorite porn stars you'd like to see in a gimp situation. Enjoy Bill K.

I wholeheartedly believe that crucifixion is one of the best forms of bondage, mostly because it practically attacks the victim on many places. According to Wikipedia, death could result from any combination of causes, including blood loss resulting in shock, sepsis following infection due to the wounds caused by the nails or by the scourging that sometimes preceded the crucifixion, or eventual dehydration. And there's also the possibility of asphyxiation because the whole body weight will have to be supported by the stretched arms, making the victim suffers from difficulty of breathing due to hyper-expansion of the chest muscles and lungs. The victim will therefore have to draw herself up by her arms, leading to exhaustion, or have her feet supported by tying or by a wood block. When no longer able to lift herself, she will die within a few minutes. And that's just marvelous considering the pain the victim has to endure.

I watched several crucifixion bondage videos myself, mostly made by Insex. Of course they did not go so far as nailing the hands of the girls, though considering pussy sewing is not uncommon in bondage world, wouldn't surprise me one day when there's a girl willing to be subjected to real crucifixion with nails and all (with the condition she has to be positioned so she will last long enough to be freed of course, cause I'm not sure death is what she's after).

And the movie in question here, Snuff-Movie directed by Bernard Rose of Candyman fame, has what may be the best crucifixion scene I've seen in any mainstream movie. It basically tells a 'movie within a movie' story, where a horror movie director went insane after losing his wife (in Tate-LaBianca fashion), so he decided to gather secret cults to support his new movie: a real snuff horror movie done in his vast mansion, in which he's going to kill his actors and actresses for real. He gathered his actresses and actors, but the show stealer (in the sense she's going to be the main menu) is Wendy Jones, played by Lisa Enos (34 years old during the release of the movie). Now in real-life, Lisa Enos is a collaborator of Bernard Rose acting as his producer, but the two times she locked a role in Bernard Rose's movie, full nudity is guaranteed, so I guess she funded his movie to show her naked body, that's actually not a bad deal.

Now Wendy here is an aspiring actress hoping for a big break so she can support his fiance once they get married. She's so committed to her craft that during the audition, she did not actually mind when the interviewer asked her to remove her clothes cause it's needed for the role:

A fine rack to behold I'd say, and we got a sex scene, one shower scene, and one bathtub scene from her as well in this movie, so we're all good, yeah?

The crucifixion scene in question happens in the climax of the movie, where every cast has been...let's say sacrificed in various ways. We are shown some men in robes entering Wendy's room where she is hanged almost unconsciously to the ceiling wearing her nightgown. They pull her down and quickly strip her of her nightgown as she tries to fight back fruitlessly. We got a nice view of her being carried on to the altar completely naked while hundreds of people are watching:

And as you can see, there's a visible wound above her left breast made by a sharp object, likely to 'mark' her role. She remains catatonic until they reach the altar and whip her backside several times which causes her to scream. Some other naked victims are visible lying on the altar, but all the eyes are on her. But the real torture begins when they place him to the cross and start to drive the nails through her hands and feet:

Needless to say, she screams out of her lungs as the nails drive their way deeper into her hands and feet. We also got a really nice close up shot of her breasts as this process takes place.

Now, I did believe Lisa Enos took roles only to show off her rack, but I must admit she's got guts. Not only she wears nothing, but she has to be seen by hundreds of people, recorded on camera, and practically touched & tortured by a dozen guys in a degrading way. To that point at least, I give her kudos. I cannot remember when did the last time an actress actually had to bear all these "humiliation", so either she's very comfortable with her body or she's so proud of it she feels it has to be seen. Whichever it is, we're the lucky ones! >_<

Now on to the best part, after done nailing her limbs to the cross, the men pulled her up slowly for everyone to see and record:

Once she's up and ready for display, the entire cult take their time recording her and looking at her form. They let her up there for several minutes as she tries to breathe. This is a very well done scene with a proper amount of run time, any bondage lover should like this scene. You can also appreciate the beauty of Lisa Enos this way. I almost cannot believe she's the mother of 3 children in real life.

I don't think I can add much to this scene, it's already good the way it is. The little touch I like the most is when Wendy was crucified, she looked up rather than looked down to her spectators. That could mean the humiliation was so hard to endure she chose not to set her sights on the degrading looks from the masses below, or maybe she was really expecting her Lord to somehow clear the mess up. The people locking their eyes and cameras on her really add to the feel this torture is inescapable and beyond degrading. She is forced to be in this position so they can enjoy watching her suffer. Lisa Enos sold the torture perfectly: she did not scream much, she did not cry much, and she did not do anything too much. Her trying to balance her back when she is on top of the crux is another little touch I really enjoy. The entire lasts more than a minute or so:

Eventually, Wendy begs for God to help her, in which the director challenged God to do something, but nothing happened. So, the director decides Wendy is of no use anymore and disposes of her by piercing her heart with a spear. The shock, the pain, the wound, and the exhaustion finally prove too much for Wendy to bear and she dies almost instantly. The ritual ends with the director having Wendy's dead body on his lap, bemoaning the lack of anything supernatural actually happening:

And that's the entire scene, the movie is worth for that scene alone, at least for me. It's sucky as a movie as a whole, but the entire crucifixion scene and any scene with Lisa Enos naked got a solid A from me.

...if my prediction is right, this should be A Canadian's cup of tea....

Maybe, maybe not.

I haven't traditionally been a crucifixion enthusiast. While crucifixions are pretty much guaranteed to be non-consensual, they haven't typically turned my crank.

That said, I did enjoy the crucifixion scene in Agent X a few years ago. So now I have an open mind to such things.

I enjoyed the review and the caps from Hank. Thanks for putting the review together and keep 'em coming.

High Horse: My apologies for the embarrassingly meager reaction you've gotten so far to your review. I refuse to believe the Olympics is keeping our posters away, but regardless, welcome to the Reviewers Club. You did a great job on your first GIMP review, hopefully the first of many to come. I'd been curious about A Dangerous Method, since I'm a big fan of Keira Knightley, one of the most beautiful women in movies today. Doesn't really sound like the classic GIMP role I would cast her in, but this will have to do until then.

Appreciate the vidcaps, too. You did a good job incorporating those into your text. No HTML errors, bonus!

The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.

--------------------

Mr. 0: Your latest review was really well-written and full of great observations. I enjoyed reading it. I think I've seen that crucifixion clip online, even though the movie seems to only be available in the UK.

One technical aspect, though. If you're going to embed caps in your review, make sure they're not huge ones like you did here. If the file size is too large, it makes your text stretched out. I corrected the size when I got home from work, but it was several hours after you posted it. E-mail me if you have any problems.

Here's the link for your review: http://ralphus.net/reviews/mainstream/snuffmovie.htm

--------------------

Bill K: Thanks for the Ariel clip. Vanilla stuff is usually off-topic here, but she's done precious little bondage, unfortunately. Or at least I don't know of much that she's done, and I've looked. God, I've looked. It's a crime that a woman that fine hasn't been tied up more often. It makes me want to book the next plane to Czechoslovakia and do it myself. I think all in all, she's about as close to perfect as any female creature out there.

Regarding her boobs, they look natural in that clip, but I've seen a still from a Bound Heat movie where they definitely look enhanced. The jury is still out on that one. But the whole idea of doing that is incomprehensible to me. You can't really improve on perfection.

She has a website. Check out Ariel's Blog and see if you can tell.

On a separate note, DAMN! Ariel is very gorgeous, dude! Those lips, the kissable butt, and those delicious natural tatas!!! Wow, this is my favorite pic of the day I've ever seen ever since the day I joined this site! I know this might make me sound like an amateur, but what's her full name? I'd very much love to see more of her work. Thanks for the great pic, Ralphus! ^^

Have you checked out HILLBILLY HOSPITALITY II yet?

Starring Maddie, Ashlee, Alisha Adams, Solara, Trixxie Guns, Rock, Alex, Grave Diggler, and Lucky Bellagio

Hot Young Ladies alone and vulnerable in the wilderness with brutal, hungry mountain men ready to enjoy their tender young secrets. The Hillbilly mountain men did it once before in the original Hillbilly Hospitality, and now they're back for more! Chalk up another sexy and arousing movie for MaX.

While on a rafting trip, four pretty girls and their guides stop to render aid to a stranded boater. The guides stay by the river bank to make the needed repairs, while the girls take a walk up a wooded trail in search of a private place to pee, finally stopping by some old picnic tables. Little do they know that they're not alone in them thar woods! The Hillbilly foursome from Hillbilly Hospitality is back, and they have has definite plans for the sexy young ladies. Guess these girls won't be needing those bikinis any more as the fellas move in to sample their intimate goodies.

I've never seen a spread this delicious on any picnic table before! Weather you prefer a breast or a thigh doesn't matter because there's plenty to go around. The girls are quickly subdued and then get to watch as one by one they are tossed on the adjacent picnic table, roughly stripped naked, and then raped and strangled to death. One girl manages to break free and make a run for it back down the trail to her raft, only to find that her guides have already been dispatched. No help coming from them. She quickly winds up on the wrong end of a gun and ain't goin' anyplace as Hillbilly Lucky puts a slug in her belly, strips her bikini off her beautiful, wide-eyed body, and then enjoys her tight little secrets right there in the raft. Meanwhile, the last sexy victim is quietly finishing her losing struggle on the picnic table as she is brutally pumped back and forth, all of her most private secrets now the property of the Hillbillies.

Several minutes later all is quiet again at the small camp site as the girls lay naked, raped and strangled with their tender pink secrets on provocative display. Dead girls really don't care what you look at, or touch, or... The picnic is over for now, but will the Hillbillies be back for sloppy seconds? Maybe the girls shoulda been listening for dueling banjos before going down that secluded trail to pee in the woods.

DIRTY DEEDS

Here is another GIMP filled movie

STUDIO of HELL

Starring MADDIE & ROCK

Mr Photaug guy has a pretty good pussy getting hustle. He hooks ups with chics & offers them modeling work. He has one HELL of a studio & it's usually all it takes to get what ever he wants. When Maddie see's some BDSM equipment, she starts to leave. He pounces. Carrying her kicking & screaming back into the dungeon. A good slam followed by a kick to the gut does noting but inspire a spirt of escape in lil Maddie. It takes a few days to soften her up. She takes to the rapin much better after some punching & electrocution. After the cum is dumped on Maddie's face, she is useless.

The leather cuts into her neck, making the veines pop out. She flips around like a wild animal in a snare. Her spirit allows her to survive a 5 minute strangling tell she dies at the end. Once dead He goes out to did another hole. He comes back for her.

Fetish Elements: (HC) STRANGLING, RAPE, Forced BJ, Facial Cum Shot, Belly Punching, Struggling, Nipple Twisting, AOH, Electrocution, Drool, Carry, Body Views.

DIRTY DEEDS

Rick wrote:

The reasons why are solely legal or maybe more to the point, pragmatic. Back in those days (1992) and still to this day in the US, adult stores and major tape and DVD distributors, by and large, do not carry any bondage with actual penetration. There are complicated legal reasons as to why, beyond simple obscenity. There was no Internet per se, back then, so if you wanted to sell your work, you had to tow the line. Of course, there are ways to bend that line.

As far as editing, the original VHS of version Guinea Pigs it was edited by "crunch and punch" technique. Just recording from one tape deck to another without an edit controller. Linear editing, very primitive. I'm sure many of the old school comp/highlight tape guys used the same methods. The Guinea Pigs DVD was tweaked in FCP so it's probably a bit better than the original master cut.

I remember always wondering why they just weren't fucking the girls. I figured it was a law. Now the law is Visa.

That makes sense. Remastered & added effects. Nice.

Mr O

Great review!

Good Hunting

MaX CoXXX

DIRTY DEEDS

High Horse: Congratulations on your initial review, that of A Dangerous Method.

The consensual spanking is a bit problematic, but Keira Knightley is so lovely. Nice looking caps.

Oh, for a chance to give Keira one of those non-consensual baths.

Your review stirred me to look up some info about the real-life persons depicted in the movie. Interesting stuff.

----------

Mr. 0: Many thanks for the review of Snuff-Movie. I've been curious about that flick and it definitely has appeal for me. I also like the details about the movie and those behind it. The Hankster caps can't be beat.

----------

MAV, Matt and High Horse: I'm right there with you guys about the female-Olympian fantasy peril thing. Besides the beach volleyball, gymnastics and swimming, there are also some very fine track athletes in those uniforms that seem to get skimpier with each Olympiad. Lean, fit, beautiful girls showing lots of skin...mmmmm.

Be sure to catch Leryn Franco, the javelin thrower from Paraguay. Outside the stadium, she's a model. My mind reels with fantastic scenarios.

----------

Unnamed: You have accurately named the nameless movie. It is indeed From Hell.

Anyone care to name the actress?

Bonus points for telling us how she gets to the interrogation.

----------

Today's Pic: Ariel shore is purty. But she doesn't appear to be in any peril.

Her real name seems to be Gabriela Lupinkova...

@Yik Yakker: Thanks for letting us know you're interested in Snuff-Movie now, pal! And yeah, those caps really did Lisa Enos justice. ^_^

In her biography I recall her saying she was forced to engage in very kinky sex. She also told of being compelled to perform oral sex at gun point. And besides being raped by her husband, she tells of a five man less than consensual gang-bang aka gang-rape. There was also a film titled Dogarama. Figure it out.

She wrote that her marriage to her pimp, manager, husband, had been plagued by violence, rape, gang-rape, forced prostitution and private pornography.

An extremely explicit movie of her life story is coming out at the end of the year. There's said to be plentiful nudity regarding the actress portraying her and very intense disturbing scenes.

Good news, right?

Kinky sex, forced blow jobs at gun point, rape, gang-rape, violence, forced prostitution and private pornography. Starring, lets get her naked and keep her that way, cuffed and stuffed, Amanda Seyfried.

Change that to Great News.

Amanda

http://misfit120.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/amanda-seyfried-31.jpg

http://www.blog4iphone.com/wallpapers/upload/DesktopWallpapers/thumbs/Amanda-Seyfried-Mean-Girls_big.jpg

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002827433/5421573183_1996_amanda_seyfried_400_xlarge.jpeg

http://www.courtneyluv.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Amanda-Seyfried-Covers-Glamour-Magazine-UK-7.jpg

http://www.courtneyluv.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Amanda-Seyfried-Covers-Glamour-Magazine-UK-3.jpg

http://www.dailystab.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/amanda-seyfried-gq-2.jpg

Life imitates art.

Amanda Seyfried Quote:

"I was trying to get this photographer's dog to come over and I thought, 'Well maybe if I stick my tongue out he will,' because dogs love to lick people's mouths," she said. "So I had my tongue out and the dog was licking it and I thought I'd be grossed out, but I wasn't!" Amanda added.

It always starts with a kiss.

http://www.celebs.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/amanda_seyfried_dog.jpg

http://www.cinemablend.com/images/news/29382/Amanda_Seyfried_Goes_Deep_First_Lovelace_Poster_Photo_1328918294.jpg

The fortunate thing is that Amanda Seyfried is not only talented, gorgeous and sexy as hell, unlike many A-list stars, she also has no problem doing nudity on camera.

Amanda Seyfried - Nude in Chloe

So maybe that bodes well for the movie, but I have my doubts. For instance, here's an article that quotes one of the producers as saying "Yes, there's a lot of nudity, but it's a message movie about respecting women."

And in another article I read online, Seyfried is quoted as saying the nude scenes were very tastefully done with no full frontal nude shots. Ugh. Respecting women? Tastefully done? Doesn't exactly sound like the exploitative biopic that might get GIMPers excited.

I did find one production still from the movie that shows Seyfried's character sporting an impressive bruise on her right cheek, so that's something. I'll be crossing my fingers, but not expecting any GIMP-tacular fireworks from this one.

----------

Ralphus: That's an interesting article about Amanda Seyfried and the Lovelace movie. First of all, only in Lovelace's wildest dreams would she resemble Amanda.

But also, the tone of the article is amusing. It voices skepticism that the phrase "respecting women" means the movie will avoid exploitation. At the same time, many GIMPers would interpret the phrase as meaning that the movie will not give us the exploitative features that we want to see.

Obviously, the author of the article has a warped perspective. ;)

----------

From Hell: The unnamed movie has been named by unnamed. Here are the rest of the details:

~ The suspect in the killings is, of course, Jack the Ripper.

~ The name of the actress who plays the prostitute is Joanna Page.

~ In the movie, the cops bust in on her while she is servicing a client. As they drag her away she is fully naked, but by the time they get her out onto the street, she is wrapped in a blanket and being carried to a horse-drawn police wagon, into which she is deposited.

I don't know where she got the dress for the interrogation, maybe one of her fellow professionals brought it down to the station for her.

I've only seen this segment of the movie. Has anyone seen it in its entirety? Does it have anything more to offer?

I'm not even sure the topic will prove to be all that interesting. In my view, it will be hard for the producers to top the documentary, Inside Deep Throat.

I will say, however, that in person Sinn Sage is ten times as hot as she is on film, so that was nice.

Just like last year, the only highlight was getting to talk to people like Christina Carter, Anastasia, Both Jewells (Marceau and Evans), and Gina Rae Michaels, and the like.

I think honestly my favorite thing was talking to a nice old guy who was selling his old BDSM magazines and had a bunch of 50's music to listen to.

Back to lurking.

Mav, the NKs aren't likely to take out their defeat on Alex Morgan: if the current dictator Kim-Jong-Un is as nasty as his father was, he'd throw his team into prison-and torture them. And have the coaching staff shot. Kinda like what Uday Hussein did when he was chair of the Iraqi Olympic Committe and the Iraqi Soccer Federation: when their Soccer team failed to get into the World Cup in '94, he had the team thrown into prison and flogged. And Uday had the coach shot.

Ah, the perils of hitchhiking.

A Canadian-take us up on that?

Below is one best sample of Fishhook rough style sex of cute girl.

I love to see celebrity 'Liz May Brice' getting fucked in this style.

I hate it when you're really looking forward to a film/scene that looks good in stills but when you watch it the scene is ten seconds long and a general letdown. CMC-082 was not a letdown, it was excellent!

Bringing it Home

This scene is from British movie 'Big Swap'. I am glad to see British movies have plenty of Bondage sex!

This actress Sorcha Brooks is familiar with television episodes turned very badly (nastly) in this movie. She never done any nude scene before this movie but surprised everyone with this hottest scene.

Any comments about this scene & actress?

The movie, starring Maggie Gyllenhaal and directed by Sidney Lumet, is originally a made for TV movie aired by HBO in 2004. The fact that one of my favorite actresses worked with one of my favorite directors alone is already enough joy for me, and add to it a strip search! Hmmm!

With the run time of 120 minutes, it depicted a story of how a graduate student from the USA (played by Maggie Gyllenhaal) is detained in China while at the same time an Arab man in the USA (played by Bruno Lastra) is taken by FBI, both under the suspicion of terrorism. In the end, both were forced to undergo a cavity search by their respective detainers. Too bad, due to its controversial nature, HBO cut it heavily, reducing it to a mere 56 minutes and pulled it out from its subscription forever. And sadly, all I watched was the 56 minute version (with the great deal of nudity left out), but I'll say one thing: despite its flaws, this movie may contain the best strip search scene in any mainstream movie (courtesy of the gorgeous Maggie). And by mainstream, of course I'm not including sexploitation and porn movies. And since this is a GIMP review, I'll completely leave out how the man is strip searched, yeah? I mean, we're all here not for that, aren't we?

In the 56 minutes version, we started with a group of Chinese soldiers taking Maggie, here playing the role of Linda Sykes, to a prison when she was having dinner with her friends:

There, we were introduced to the interrogator Liu played by Ken Leung. And this is the start of an experience she will never forget:

He bombarded her with questions and evidences pointing out to the fact she has some connection with a terrorist planning to bomb China. After 20-25 minutes of back and forth debate with no legit result due to Linda's persistence, Liu met with his boss and the ambassador of the USA in China. Linda has pretty much been playing the 'tough girl' role. Though she was scared and intimidated by the risk she may be facing, anything Liu said practically was for nothing, so a verbal battle will do him no good. After the ambassador ensured Liu the matter will not reach the government of USA, Liu knew what that means: he can go all out, and Linda won't like it.

When the camera spanned back to the interrogation chamber, we were shown it was hours after Linda's initial detaining and it's already morning now. Liu went back inside as she was having some sit ups, possibly to keep her mind in calm. Things go awry for her when Liu put up some gloves and told her to "Take your clothes off, I'm going to do a strip search".

Of course Linda rejected, trying to argue she has the right to see someone from her embassy. Finally running out of patience, Liu tore her shirt off by force:

From then on, Linda lost her composure and tried to cover herself to no avail. Truth be told, there's a little touch I really like in here. I fancy how after ripping of her shirt, all Liu did was giving little pushes for Linda to slowly take her clothes off. Liu started by removing her shirt. And then he pointed to her bra, which she embarrassingly removed as well. When she was in topless state, Liu leaned his back on the wall and reminded her that her skirt is still intact, so it must go as well. I think it was a good decision from Lumet to shoot this entire scene from behind, giving us a good look of Linda's back.

We really got the gist of unwillingness & humiliation from Linda's character. The one little touch I really like is when Linda was slowly removing her skirt because Linda used one arm to cover her breasts while the one was doing the deed, it really added the feeling of "yeah, that is probably something anyone would do in real life if they were put to that situation". The fact that it was done slowly adds to the power and control Liu begun to possess over Linda. She was presented to him in her purest form, with nothing to cover her dignity. This is a very good start to a cavity search and very natural too!

Being a Sydney Lumet movie, it's only normal if the performances in this movie are natural. And that's what Maggie showed in here. She made sure we saw Linda now knows this is serious, she's got no way to go. And the fact Liu actually took his time watching and waiting until Linda's arms tire themselves from covering her breasts and crotch is another little touch to adore. It is indirectly saying "take your time, I know you won't last". Another humiliation for Linda. And her not making any eye contact also adds more legitimacy to the torment her character is bearing. This is good writing & acting all combined.

And of course she didn't last, visible from her finally lowering her arms and giving us a look of her nice body:

Curvy, bushy, and bountiful, just the way I like it.

And it didn't take long for Liu to begin by starting the cavity search from her mouth, mocking her to open it wider like during oral sex when she refused to do so, explaining to her what cavity search means when he's doing so. This is another subtle touch from the screenwriter. In reality, we all know Liu & Linda knew nothing would have been found by checking Linda's mouth. Liu just did that because he could and there was nothing Linda could do about it.

After making Linda admit she was a lesbian, Liu then remarked whether or not she would feel something if he fingers her, to which she roughly yelled "DON'T!". Liu mocked her back by saying, "Oh, don't? Did you just say don't?" in a condescending tone, as if letting her know it's not her place to get 'rough', so to speak. Linda lowered her voice this time, and said "Please, don't", to which Liu replied with another mockery by saying, "Hmm, now that's kinda sweet". Linda admitting herself as a lesbian will prove to be her downfall. But the torment doesn't stop there, Liu chided that she reminded her of a frightened little girl before proceeding to have a feel of her bare nipples with his finger:

It did not take long for Linda to react by trying to push him away to no avail, because he retaliated.

What I really like from this whole scene is the fact Linda didn't look at Liu unless he made a remark of touching her or actually touched her. The whole time, she looked to the ceiling or the wall. Now, just FYI, I've been told people avoid eye contact when they're scared or intimidated. So this was a nice move from Miss Gyllenhaal because that means the reality level of the scene has just increased.

Next up, showing her power over her again, Liu allowed Linda to sit back a little while they both mocked each other, but Liu eventually had the upper hand when he showed her evidences and possible witness, her ex-lesbian lover:

Linda finally broke down and cried. Pitying her, Liu gave her back her shirt though it did not cover much to be honest:

Then, they went back and forth explaining why they both protected what they believed, ending up with Liu losing his patience for the second time. This time, she had Linda placed her hands palm flat to the wall. We all know what's coming next: an anal examination. Liu remarked how this is his less favorite part, but we all know it's not true.

Linda took one last shot by mocking Liu's result, prompting Liu to remove her shirt by force one more time before starting to feel Linda. We got a nice close-up of Liu feeling up her forehead, and then down to her breasts, which he groped nicely (lucky man!). Linda's face indicated her giving in, unwillingly of course. He really took his time fondling her right breast, and then the left one:

But hell, if I had gotten the chance I'd have taken my time too, LOL! And then he went down to her waist & derriere:

We were not shown the actual anal examination & crotch rubbing, but you can tell from the close up to Linda's face that it was not comfortable (duh!):

Liu made a remark how he can just put her into custody with no clothes on, so that everyday he got a chance to feel her up however he likes. And he's going to do it so often, that Linda will need his fingers around her privates like she needs food or air. And the best part is, he's going to lay his fingers on her body countless times then even when he isn't there to please himself, she will always feel the sensation of his hands on her form. Giving up, Linda finally broke down and fell to her knees, admitting her crime.

Now, this is quite a great scene. I love how Liu told her what he's going to do to her like it's just a story to remember, and the close up with Linda eventually raising the white flag was pretty well done as well. We closed the movie with the scene of Liu leaving the room after telling Linda someone will come to process her and Linda brutally destroying the furniture inside the chamber to unleash her anger over her defeat:

And by the looks of it, I don't think she cares if the process needs her naked as well, LOL!

Alright, and that's all for the GIMP scene in the movie. One of the reasons MG is one of my favorite actresses is the legitimacy she brings to her role and the fact she's willing to go to lengths many famous actresses won't go. With that rack and a cute face, I kinda facepalm myself whenever someone tells me she's ugly or got a dog face.

All in all, the GIMP scene in this feature got an A- from me. Though it may be the best mainstream strip search scene for now, it doesn't have the A+ which is two levels higher than the grade I give because of two reasons:

i. Liu giving Linda her clothes back was dumb considering he wasn't there to comfort her, it barely covered anything, and it went off pretty soon after. Complete nudity length was reduced in there.

ii. The anal examination and crotch rubbing should have been shown explicitly. As I said before, MG didn't hide a thing. No reasons why it couldn't have been done.

But the length (more than 12 minutes), the gripping realism (Linda's expression & sweating body), and the acting helped a good deal of the entire product. Definitely a recommended watch!

I was toying with the idea of calling my posts "Epistles" to give them an almost religious urgency, I even wrote a paragraph to explain my reasons, motivations, ... but after further examination I thought it was a bit fucktarded. Oh well, not all ideas of mine are brilliant. Most of them are, but not all.

I do have, however, a lot to report because, as it happens, a lot is happening in our midst.

I also have the need to respond to some posts. So, ready or not, here I go.

That's me in the picture, by the way. When I was having my own little Via Crucis.

We have a new release: The Via Crucis of Camille - Crux 10, the last of this most intimate, most sexy, series.

Camille is put into a strappado, then on her knees, then on the cross, and whipped over and over. That's not all as JJ has much more in store for poor Camille. 40 minutes of Camille as you have never seen her. The last rehearsal they filmed before the classic Red Feline on the Cross.

With this installment we complete the series. All together, this series forms a very exciting progression on Camille's relationship with the cross.

What started as a series of exercises in performing a scene became a lot more than that. Each session is a complete sequence of events that culminates on a crucifixion.

The idea, I mentioned it before, was to work out some details of a scene that JJ was writing for a movie. He began long ago, at the end of the 80's, with me.

We discussed the sequence, the steps he wanted to portray and we did a few clips on a VHS camera in our duplex apartment in the South Street Port area of New York City when we were living there after a year of traveling throughout Europe with his film on Haiti.

Later on, when we moved to Bolivia, we met Camille who captivated JJ and became his muse. She was perfect for a role in the miniseries we were going to produce. One thing led to another and after the miniseries Camille and JJ became very involved in developing her skills in acting and he used the opportunity to work out the famous scene.

As I mentioned before, this was never intended to be shown to the public. But after Red Feline on the Cross came out and Camille became known for that work the need to show how she became the star of the film that started it all grew and grew and we could not ignore it any longer. So, we released the movies that are the seeds for what we do now.

Sirwinakuy is a very beautiful film, one that affects people in so many different ways and Vero (aka Gabrielle) makes the film work so well, she conveys her character's feelings in such a powerful way.

She's also the star of two up coming films Barbazul also by Amy, and Dead But Dreaming, directed by Jac. I don't know if you saw Martyr, where Vero has a great role. Martyr inspired Amy to join us and made her think of Vero and Jac for the main roles in Sirwinakuy.

Seven Days is next in line for final post and it should be out by the end of the month, finally.

I'm sure Jane/Amy would love to hear your comments on Sirwinakuy. It's a really great job she did with that. And in these times of lame 50 shades of grey, it's really topical and timely.

The way Vero/Gabrielle portrays Varinia in Seven Days On The Cross is almost the same stoically beautiful way she plays Anouk in Sirwinakuy and The Bride in Crux Bride

Believe me, I tried to make my posts shorter but the moment I set my brain in motion it doesn't seem to want to stop.

We might come up with a Justin Case release of Dead But Dreaming to our most ardent fans before Dec 21, 2012. We will demand, however, some glowing reviews of the film to be published everywhere so if the world is still running strong and the Mayas were wrong there will be a lot of people interested in the film.

As far as the thinking down here, recently the Foreign Relations minister here said that the Maya predictions didn't mean that the world was over, but rather that it was the end of Coca Cola and the beginning of MocoChinchi (a local drink made of out of peaches. Ironically Coca Cola was/is a Coca based drink and Coca is a local plant while peaches are originally from Spain.)

That funny statement was taken as a message that Coca Cola was going to be outlawed in Bolivia, so we are stocking coca cola cans to sell them in the coming black market which will be bigger than anything since alcohol was outlawed in the US. We might be able to finance another huge budget inquisition movie with the income we'll get in the black market.

The scene where the nice picture comes from is a long enough scene to satisfy the most demanding of GIMPERS while at the same time the movie is mainstream enough to reach a huge crowd.

Le Marquis de la Croix is simply GIMP from beginning to end and it has enough situations to reach many of the GIMP subdivisions like AOH, RACK, WHIPPING, Crucifixion, bastinado... and on and on. And it has a nicely decorated Dungeon as well. I could create a new genre of films for Le Marquis de la Croix. The Dungeon Genre.

Until next time!

Reine Margot

* * * * *

Mr O: Wow, nice job on the review of Strip Search. I would have to argue that Maggie Gyllenhaal is an acquired taste, but it is one that I have acquired over the course of several movies she has done, taking chances that would make most Hollywood "actresses" blanch. She is one of the few of a special breed. She manages to sell every role I have seen her in. I have not seen this movie--haven't even heard of it. So thanks for mentioning it and doing such a careful review of the applicable GIMP scene.

The illustrated review of Snuff Movie was also superb. Great pictures. Nice descriptions. It is a pleasure to read your reviews.

* * * * *

Griffin: I'm with Flintstone concerning the scene from Big Swap. Who the hell does a scene like that and leaves her top on? This is one of those scenes where, in my reviewing style, I would subtract points for sheer stupidity. It has so much potential, but leaves me wondering WTF. Those are really nice caps, though, and laid out well. Thanks for taking the time to post it.

The other pics you posted of the rough sex scene were really nice, except I'm not much for the hands-in-the-face-fingers-in-the-mouth stuff. I think I would have taken hold of her hair and pulled her head back hard with each thrust. I think that might have made for some better expressions of pain as well. But that's me. Nice pics, though. Thanks for posting!

* * * * *

Linda Lovelace Biopic(s): I have no expectations that these will be any good at all. Amanda Seyfried is hot and has done some edgy roles. She is also not afraid of nudity. But it looks to be, after all, a mainstream movie. I hate to pigback on a brainless conservative meme, but I have come to think of them as "lamestream" movies, at least as far as good GIMP goes. I admit that it has a much better chance of having some decent scenes since it doesn't star, say Jessica Alba, who would pretty much insure it sucking.

Malin Ackerman is also not afraid of nudity, and I have generally liked her in the movies I've seen. Of the two, however, I think I would much prefer seeing Amanda Seyfried naked and sexually abused, hopefully featuring some form of bondage. Not having read any of the books about Linda Lovelace's abuse, I don't know if she ever claimed she was bound or otherwise restrained. For that matter, I don't know that I believe everything she said or that she was a completely unwilling participant during her adult movie career, either. But I digress. Even if she wasn't actually bound and abused, a talented GIMP-leaning filmmaker could always do it anyway. Films are never true to the books.

* * * * *

A Canadian: Ooh, thanks for that standing spread-eagle pic from Red Feline. God, I love that position.

* * * * *

High Horse: That was also a very nice review of A Dangerous Method. The movie didn't do much for me GIMP-wise, but anything with Keira Knightley is enjoyable, and if she is naked and abused--even if it is *gasp* consensual--it is a must-see movie for me. I even like her when she is clothed. You did a great job illustrating your review as well. Thanks for taking the time.

* * * * *

MaX CoXXX: I am fascinated by your stuff, but I am not much into snuff. Even so, the more I see of your pics and clips, the more convinced I am that one of these days you are going to hit just the right combination to compel me to buy some of your movies. Studio of Hell comes awful darn close. Thank you for posting to keep the forum up to date on your releases.

Reine I have to ask why do you guys have to have a second inquisition, fiery, burn the witch big budget production to do another fiery bats movie? Why can't a short story small budget small cast modern day witch burning movie be as successful or at least profitable as Maleficarum was?

In any case may I suggest the next Bats movie be a nighttime bats event. I believe any kind of gimp peril looks more erotic when filmed at night time by firelight. There something about a terrified naked damsel body in distress in the glow of firelight that just drive me aaa...well, batty. Anyone else concur? Bill K.

http://www.unwatchable.cc/thefilm/

--------------------

Griffin: You know, when I saw your vidcaps, I just assumed they were from a hardcore movie. It's not often that you see pussy fur in mainstream films. But I checked the IMDB and The Big Swap is a real movie from 1978. Ah, the 1970s, how I miss them...

--------------------

Mr. 0: I've heard about Maggie Gyllenhaal's scene in Strip Search but never seen it. If the original film was 120 minutes long and the only existing version runs 56 minutes now, I'd say that film was butchered. Even worse, when I was searching for a place to acquire it, the closest I could find was $99.99 at Amazon.com. And that's apparently for the cut version, too. It's a fairly recent title by a big name director; hard to believe Lumet didn't have the clout to prevent his work from being destroyed. I guess whoever was lucky enough to record the film originally off HBO in 2004 should hang on to their copies.

I'm like you, I find Maggie Gyllenhaal to be attractive, at least when she was younger in her earlier roles like Secretary and Donnie Darko. And she's also a very courageous actress who doesn't shy away from demanding roles.

The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.

--------------------

Margot: The problem with doing another big budget Inquisition movie is the fear of repeating yourselves. As good as Maleficarum was, what else can you do to top it? Well, besides the obvious, which is do the burning at the stake scene over and do it right this time, with a lot of wood and a spectacular fire. But other than that, how do you improve on the best Inquisition film ever made? What other tortures are left? The whipping, rack and horse scenes were already done well. We'll never, ever see another spit roasting, that's an absolute given. A longer, prolonged rape scene with nudity is one way to make things better than last time.

I would even welcome a new cast. I love Amy, but how about some new blood? If you stick her and Mila into another Inquisition movie, people are just going to think of it as Maleficarum Part 2 unless you bring something new to the table. Remember there was a sequel to Mark of the Devil, but no one thinks back fondly on it because it was just a weaker retread of the first film.

--------------------

John Galt wrote:

After seeing Russ Meyer's interpretation of a bound beauty with a stick of lit dynamite planted between her outstretched legs, pictures of bound babes and explosives kind of has a high bar.

Ah, we're going back to the 1970s again. Russ Meyer, one of the cinema's great revolutionaries. But how many people have even seen that movie? You just gave me an idea for the daily picture...

You just gave me an idea for the daily picture...

That was my intention. Bwahahahaha!

Yeah, I realize Strip Search is a very rarely seen movie, but I guess it's more for it's controversial nature. And too bad it's been massacred to not even resemble half of its original feature cause I heard it contains more nudity. I guess the producers of this movie were not big fan of GIMP scenes...

Regarding MG, yes she's somewhat of an acquired taste. Though I've always found her quirky & attractive since the first time I saw Secretary. And after I watched Strip Search & Sherrybaby, I was convinced of her diverse talent and guts. At least I can safely say she's not another actress that was born in the industry and grew big thanks to money & connections only ala Gwyneth Paltrow & Natalie Portman. It baffles me, though, how in her imdb page nobody ever stops from mocking MG, calling her "dog face" or the likes. I mean, the hell?! Dog face?!

------

@Ralphus: Thanks for the help as always, man. ^^

If you want to watch Strip Search or the GIMP scenes only, I'd advice you to download it from the internet rather than spending actual money, mate. Like you said, the existing print is massacred, I don't think it's worth a hundred bucks when you can get it for free. I don't know much about the production, but I assumed Lumet didn't produce this movie because if he did, I bet the 120 minutes version isn't going nowhere.

And about MG, yep I agree she's plenty attractive. She's pretty, but more like on the "Girl Next Door" level (ala Robin Tunney, Adrienne Barbeau, Kaley Cuoco, Linnea Quigley, Uschi Digard, Jocelin Donahue, Anna Faris, and Audrey Tautou) than "Goddess" level (e.g: Olivia Wilde, Marilyn Monroe, Raquel Welch, Julia Roberts, Sandra Bullock, Jennifer Aniston, Emmanuele Beart, Morena Baccarin, Anna Karina, Michelle Bauer, Christina Lindberg, and Gong Li) so she's definitely more "Acquirable & Reasonable" even for an everyday Joe like me (and more believable too, at least unlike how the majority of the masses perceive Katherine McPhee's husband and Christina Hendricks' husband). And her natural rack doesn't hurt her physical quality either.

Still, GIMP wise, Strip Search may have the best cavity search scene in non-porn or non-exploitation movies. Too bad we can only see half the length. Otherwise I'm sure I would have given it the perfect grade. If there's a movie, even a sexploitation one, that dedicates its content and full length to a serious and more explicit cavity search in the future, I have no doubt it can top Strip search.

And on the topic of Russ Meyer, although I'm a huge fan of his (I have 80% of his filmography) and I believe he is no doubt the greatest sexploitation movie director of all time, I think he definitely lacks GIMP scenes in his movies. Other than the one we have as today's pic, the only one I can think of is the double rape scene from Up! (1976), but even then it's more goofy than serious. I think bondage GIMP scenes can be found mostly in the European sexploitation movies.

But, thanks for today's picture. It gives me an inspiration to do a sexploitation movie review next. :)

I mean, after you've seen enough of them, they all sort of melt into one giant image of big boobs.

Today's pic: That would have to be Russ Meyer's 'Supervixens' if I'm not mistaken.

-------

@Ralphus: Chief, I finally found the two pictures I wanted to show you:

All I know is they speak in they speak Czech. The studio & the model are currently unknown to me, so if you can help me find out about this I would be extremely grateful. Others can help too if they want. Thanks! >_<

That would have to be Russ Meyer's 'Supervixens' if I'm not mistaken.

You're not mistaken. I figured with the cast of perverts and sick fucks that read this board, it wouldn't take long for one of them to chime in with the answer. That movie is also in our Electro-Shock Database for the rather nasty beaten and then electrocuted scene with Shari Eubank (complete with video clip). And if you fast-forward the video, the spread-eagled scene with the dynamite between her legs begins at approximately the 1:30 mark.

----------------------

Mr. 0: You weren't quite fast enough on the right answer, as Sardu beat you to the punch. And I haven't a clue on your mystery photos, sorry.

And too bad about the pictures. Thanks for the help, BTW. Let's just leave 'em hanging in there in case anyone recognizes them.

If you would like to discuss "plots" please let Ralphus get us together privately as my mind is still full of incredibly wicked and hot films of gorgeous girls being tortured for a reason...you know...the plot and believe me I know more about working on a budget than anyone still out there!

The advantage I have is not so much that a I have a B.A. in Cinema & Photography as it is in real life experience.

For instance, not too long ago Danielle and I went to the Caribbean...(I won't say which island for obvious reasons)...where she THOUGHT she was going to play the part of a way-too-hot slut just asking for it. Instead, she was tricked by another young woman into a situation poor Danielle thought was real...when she was arrested and hauled off to a creepy jail where she was really "interrogated" by uniformed "officers"...made to strip...tortured and repeatedly raped by them before she was put in a "bull-pen" full of horny young studs who kept on torturing and fucking her until she just lost it.

When it ended and she found out what she had been told would happen to her...(that she consented to and had contracted for financially)...had been changed to give her the terrifying experience of being dragged into an old 19th Century prison where huge black men with massive cocks hurt and tortured her just because they could get away with torturing and raping a "Known Prostitute" who had connections to "drugs"...well she wanted to fucking kill me but we both knew she had hated to love every minute of the real fear and pain they inflicted on her "Torture-And-Fuck-Me-Toy" body.

Hell, I could write you script following how she got herself and her real-life niece...(who is just as hot and crazy for pain as Danielle)...into real trouble with again...men she had every reason to believe were real DEA agents who resorted to torturing our gorgeous...(38-22-34) niece and her DDD tits in front of Danielle with NEITHER OF THEM KNOWING IT HAD ALL BEEN PLANNED.

Margot...it's like Danielle has said..,"When men I don't know that have never seen mine before think they are actually committing the felonies of raping and torturing me...believe me...THEY REALLY ARE!" And the same thing goes for her in reverse...when she thinks she or she and some other hot pussy have been forcibly abducted and are taken to an isolated place only God knows where...to be tortured and savagely raped...yeah, it's real for her because IT IS FUCKING REAL.

This has been going on...Danielle being manipulated into dangerous situations where she really has been raped many times and tortured...especially by having long needles skewered completely through her EE breasts...(which she got in 2000 for the express purpose of driving young men to the point that they become willing to commit felony rape!)...so many times in so many countries that I think I can help you with a "NEW DIRECTION" that will have men ejaculating in their pants in the movie theater!

I would love to give you working scripts as it is my opinion that a film made without a shooting script is just another cookie-cutter job that still misses the point of what guys want which is to see beautiful girls and young women being really TORTURED and RAPED...if not by cocks then by machines that fit into the plot and are used for a reason. *(Like when she was arrested by the island's "police" and interrogated. Of course they showed her their secret...a huge old antique wooden chair with its wooden sprockets and gears that turned a hot-oil-gushing, massive "cock" into Danielle's pussy so deep she couldn't get her breath and it was easy to see the bulge it made in her hard, flat belly as it rotated upward until "my pussy" was wrecked for a week by having 12 inches of almost 3 inch thick "cock" screwed up inside her...before they started stabbing pins into her breasts...burning her nipples and torturing her pussy the same way until she was so fucking wild from having orgasms and terrified from thinking they really might kill her...she finally just lost it and passed out...but that didn't stop anything but that part of her night of real fucking horror!

You see...the good part of these things is that after Danielle has been driven into a state of real agony and real ecstasy at the same time...I get to enter the scene either in a disguise or after she has been blindfolded and torture my gorgeous slut wife with no more restraint than I use on some hot little bitch I don't know!

Try me Margot...I know how to really DO IT to a girl and how to also do it cheap! This is for everybody:

I know this forum is for discussing films and I feel like an ass and intruder because for myself...as long as Danielle needs to be actually raped...(as it is real rape for her when she doesn't know the men who were torturing her)...or as long as she continues to manipulate the kind of "Fuck-Me-Toys" who have the bodies I want into shall I say "situations" they can't get out of...I have little interest in "watching" movies when really hot and really scared "Torture-Me-Toys" are out there just waiting to be had.

My point is...do any of you know of a website where men like me...(with a ravenously beautiful wife with a body and tits you can't believe until you see her in person, who will never admit it but who NEEDS to be actually tortured and really raped by men she does not know)...can find other men or women who are actively doing the real thing for whatever reasons...and would like to "compare notes" as it were...privately?

Fantasy torture and fantasy rape just don't get it once you've had the real thing and learned how to get inside a girl's head a lot more than just getting one's cock in her pussy against her will.

I would love to share specific incidents and experiences I've had with Danielle and other beautiful women who needed to be tortured and raped even if they didn't consciously know it until it happened...if anyone wants to know.

Maybe I'm too close to the forest to see the trees but if you've seen a few pictures of Danielle and have a good grasp of what she looks like...I should think knowing what has happened to her and what has been done to that hot fucking body of hers would make a dead man's cock hard BECAUSE BOYS AND GIRLS...IT AIN'T FANTASY!...(like being held in a real dungeon outside Munich for 2 days and nights where at one point she was fucked by 46 men...one after the other...as she was being tortured.)

Help me out here guys...if you can.

While I was googling for it came across this:

http://talesofperil.com/?cat=1

which looks Gimper would like. It's got an electric shock picture. Bill K.

http://xhamster.com/movies/1151977/bitch_in_the_wood.html

Friedrich

When it's done right, a forced-stripping scene can be very erotic. It sounds like they got it right in Strip Search. And I do like Maggie Gyllenhaal, although I can appreciate that she wouldn't necessarily be to everyone's liking.

That said, I'm not sure this forum has the kind of people you're looking for if you're wanting to discuss and share your stories of how you torture your wife...or recruit local guys to torture her with you. Some of us have real-life experiences (myself included) dealing with aspects of the "scene", but my guess is that most of us are novices in that field and prefer the "safer" fantasy of watching it depicted onscreen.

One site I can suggest is FetLife. It's a really huge site (at least compared to our humble little forum) and it has thousands of members, men and women who are into the lifestyle from all over the world. I'm a member but not active at all, since it's not really something I'm into. But I'll bet you could have some success meeting others there if you market yourself right, particularly since you're a celebrity of sorts in the field based on your past work.

The link to the site is in my Homepage URL above. It's a free site.

----------------------

Random_User: Welcome to the site, we're glad you found us. I'm a hanging fan but probably not a big enough enthusiast for the fetish to start a new database by myself just based on hanging scenes. I like the idea and I considered it a few years ago when I saw a collection of hanging clips online. If you or any other hanging fans are interested, send me a list of scenes and we'll see if we can get something together.

The next one up is a hot iron database, but it's definitely in the future since I've had little time to work on it and the member who said he would help disappeared after sending me his first contribution. People like having the databases online but few want to make the effort to help put them together. I'm only one person with big intentions but limited free time.

One hanging scene that's similar to the Ilsa one is a fairly obscure title called Mob Story, where a hot blonde played by Kate Vernon gets tied with her hands behind her and a noose around her neck while balanced on a block of ice. It's a real nice, long scene, worth seeking out. I tried to order it myself on DVD a few years ago but my order got canceled and I never re-ordered it.

----------------------

Sloth: You're alive! I checked; you haven't been here since early January. Hope everything is okay at home and you'll be joining us again on a regular basis.

Random_User, I know Dolcett Girls are heavy into the hanging peril.

http://zizki.com/comics/Dolcett

is a one site of their works. I not a fan of hanging peril but I like Dolcett's spit roast peril. Bill K.

---------

@A Canadian: Oh, thank you for the praise! >_<

Yes, I think we're on the same page regarding Strip Search and MG. Here's one hoping in the future we can have cavity search GIMP scenes with similar or even superior quality. :)

And I finally got around searching all the nude scenes in The Abductors. Can I just be honest and say Laurie Rose stole the freaking show from Cheri Caffaro?! Damn, that scene in the pool table was so effin HOT!!! I was wow-ing the whole time!Thanks for the recommendation, dude! Again!

----------

And to live up to my words about reviewing a sexploitation title, my review for this week is for Prison Girls (1972).

I encountered this sexploitation movie by chance upon my hunt of Uschi Digard movies because I'm a HUGE (pun intended) fan of hers. The story, just like any sexploitation movie, is pretty simple. Six female prisoners are given a weekend furlough to prepare them for their upcoming parole. While out, they all have miscellaneous sexual experiences, some good, some bad. One returns to her pimp even though he beats her, one overcomes her frigidity, one gets gang raped, two join in a threesome, and one goes back to her criminal lover shortly before the police show up.

Needless to say, this is one of the best WIP films ever made. It's filled with pantheons of nudities from start to finish. Hell, we start this movie by the mandatory shower scene!

The girls are plenty nice, with good racks and pretty face. Uschi Digard's love scene in the final part of the movie is considered the highlight for 2 GIGANTIC reasons:

Yep, lucky man! I know, I'm envious of the guy too.

But before we get some love, the third segment of the movie is a great GIMP scene worthy of being more well known. The victim in question is called Joyce, played by the delicious sexploitation star Maria Arnold (not the governor's wife, of course), who is often featured whenever Uschi Digard is also featured in a movie (although Maria is usually the ones receiving the GIMP scenes, for whatever reason).

Unfortunately, I was unable to acquire the pictures of Maria Arnold in this movie. But so that you got an idea of why anyone would want her as a victim, this is how her face looks like:

And this is her GIMP scene where she is sold as slavegirl in a slave auction from another movie which also starred Uschi, Below The Belt (1971):

Now at least we got a general idea of her rack, which is pretty cool. Too bad that scene is so damn short.

Now back to the movie I'm reviewing, Joyce here visits her former brother-in-law in a damp garage. And by former I mean her husband already died. I don't really remember the exact problem, but I'm sure the death of her husband had something to do with her serving time in jail, and she's here to apologize...somewhat. The brother-in-law is a wimp, and from the get go when Joyce enters with skimpy clothing, it's 1000000% obvious he's been in love with her since day 1. Although since this is a sexploitation cinema, I think questioning why Joyce wore a very sexy outfit to this part of the town would be ridiculous.

Things are calm for them at first, but then a gang of bikers enter the scene. I think they have around 4 or 5 people, don't remember (not that it matters). The leader is your usual sleazy and horny man with trashy mouths and disregard over the law. The rest of his gang is more or less the same: 2 rednecks and 2 scary girls. Needless to be said, Joyce senses danger and excuses herself to her BIL. But the gang leader grabs her by the arm and makes his intention well known: to have some.

Joyce retaliates but the rest of the gang quickly grabs her limbs as she screams and kicks, begging her wimpy BIL to help. But the wimp barely does anything without the gang leader so much as threatening him. Joyce quickly had her clothes torn off of her and before long, she is stark naked saved for some high heels sandals (I think). FYI, Maria Arnold is ALL woman from head to toe. I did say she was delicious, didn't I?

She still does the kicking and screaming all the way when the gang lifts her and brings her to the sofa to prepare her for the 'action'. This is a very well done scene. I think the fact that Maria Arnold can actually act helped this scene a lot. She never stopped fighting back even when she had people holding her from moving. They finally got her in the sofa but she eventually fights back and runs away from their clutch. Too bad, just like in any B-movie, instead of heading to the exit door she heads to where she can see nothing but walls. A very very unwise decision. Okay, let's say if she goes to the street people will see her naked, but isn't that better than being gang raped? Although in the first place, maybe a woman as beautiful as she was shouldn't have visited that part of the town, LOL. Why not phone her BIL and ask him to meet somewhere safe and crowded like the park?

Okay, enough with the joke. Back to the bizz, Joyce is quickly cornered by the gang. And despite her best efforts to throw things she can throw and hide from her oppositions, she is quickly outnumbered and clutched again. For the second time, they bring her to the sofa and this time they hold her on all fours to make sure another escape is out of the question for her. She screamed and kicked all the way through, but that's it for her.

Exhausted after all the fighting, Joyce starts begging her BIL to do something. I think she asks for him to "not let them do this", but I could be wrong. But luck has run out for her indeed. Instead of helping her, with some rude encouragement from the gang, the BIL shows his true color: he is really in love with her and has always wanted her for himself, and this is the chance.

The BIL starts going down on her before humping her, with catcalls from the gang echoing throughout. We have several close up of Joyce's face, crying and obviously looking betrayed. Whenever I watch this scene, I actually did sympathize with her character. Okay, she's a criminal. But she's about to receive a parole and planning to turn her life for the better, which is why she visits the only family she has left. But it ended this way, so it's kinda tragic.

Joyce can only cry when the BIL climaxes and proudly yells "I did it!!". The gang leader quickly throws him away and takes his turn on her. There's another great GIMP scene where Joyce asks for mercy, saying it's enough. But the gang has no heart in the 1st place so, we end the scene with the gang humping her as tears stream down her face. Later in the ending, it is implied that the male members of the gang did rape her so badly she needs to be treated in a hospital. Although her friends dismissively play down the rape by simply saying "She'll recover and live".

So, what do I like about this rape scene? Well, rape scenes are common in mainstream movies, but the thing that I truly like from the one in this film is the element of betrayal and the fact that Joyce did try to fight back several times only to have herself overpowered. Now, I realize rape is more about power than sex, which is why taking down the victim after fighting back scores better point in GIMP scenes IMO rather than toppling the victim once without much fighting and doing her. Joyce's reaction is incredibly realistic and some scenes, especially the close-up to her face during the rape is kinda heartbreaking (especially knowing her original intention of visiting her BIL like I said above). And of course, the betrayal element is crystal clear so I have no need of mentioning it again. Maybe if there's something I want to add, I would have shown every member going at her. Sorry, I'm not big on implication when it comes to violence.

Regardless, with the copious amount of nudity and sex, Prison Girls as a movie definitely got an A+ from me and the GIMP scene by Maria Arnold receives a solid A-.

And I just remembered that another hanging scene that is kind of long is from the movie Blood Relic.



Anyway, thank you so much for the Mob Story recommendation, and I will keep an eye out for it. Also, very nice picture of the day.

Bill K.: Thank you for the very thoughtful link. I do appreciate it.

Mr. 0 I'm late getting to it but thanks for the review of Strip Search. That was a terrific write-up -- rich in detail and fun to read.

I'm even later but I'll second that.

I think Maggie looks fine, and I hope someday to ask her out and tell her so personally. Then I'll tie her up and put her in my trunk.;)

----------

Mr. 0 wrote:

Can I just be honest and say Laurie Rose stole the freaking show from Cheri Caffaro?!

You won't get an argument from me.

Thanks for bringing Prison Girls to our attention. Maria Arnold does indeed look hot. And she gets her clothes ripped off? I'm in.

Looks like this might be a scene from your movie...

Today's Pic: This is a great idea, re-doing men's adventure magazine covers to make them more revealing.

I'd like to see more of them.

----------

Donny wrote:

And I just remembered that another hanging scene that is kind of long is from the movie Blood Relic.

I thought that was the best scene in the movie. The cool thing about it is that the victim's friends are trying to push open the door to save her, without realizing that the noose is set to tighten as the door opens. *heh-heh*

3 Virgin Productions is a site that specializes in hanging vids.

I haven't tasted their wares but it looks like nude scenes are in the minority.

It was these illustrations along with the great Pin-Up" art of Gil Elvgren that awakened and allowed me to discover my talent for re-drawing these images with the girls stripped and being tortured the way we all wished they'd been done in the first place. In the case of Gil's work...I stripped the girls and put them in situations of torture...all of which I did in secret because in 1953 I was 12 yrs. old and the son of a fucking Baptist deacon!

He never knew that my mother's 1st cousin Claire was an "intimate-friend" of Mr. Elvgren or that he painted my mother...Claire and Sassy several times, so I had the incredible pleasure of knowing the man and learning a great deal from him.

However, my one yr. older sister "Sassy" discovered my stash and liked them...a lot..but that is another subject all together because she was "way-too-hot-and-built-like-a-real-life-torture-and-fuck-me-toy" for her own mischievous good and being the little amoral "vixen" she was...she showed some of my drawings to Gil and he got a kick out of seeing how I'd "altered" his work.

A couple of years ago I got a couple of books on the subject of "Men's Magazines" and just for the hell-of-it I "corrected" some of the illustrations, so now that some of you have asked Ralphus to "give you more"...well I'll have to do better work and provide same to Ralphus for all of you to lust over and love having something to contribute to this great forum everyone can relate to...that is everyone over the age of 55 or 60 because we were the ones who had nothing but these lust and torture the Beautiful Bitches magazine covers to get-off with!

Look for "Alterations by J. Blakemore" in the near future as I'm pretty sure my friend Ralphus will post them as I send them to him...and just to make it more interesting, when one is posted...respond with ideas or requests about how a particular illustration might be done differently to satisfy your own likes and I'll do it with pleasure!

Thanks for the tip Ralphus...I'll check it out and ya-all be careful out there...don't get killed or caught!

And yeah, Laurie Rose literally made me drool when she got into action. Damn!!! Who knows a girl next door can be so hot?!

And thanks for providing that picture of Maria Arnold. We really need to see more of the unsung heroes of sexploitation cinema around here.

The movie is filmed in 1998 IMDB reference: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118717/

I have no clue why the film makers have decided to left her top on and leaving only bottomless (hairy pussy) in a nice bondage sex scene! It may be she refused to go on full nude. I dream they could have filmed another uncut full nude bondage sex scene with Sorcha Brooks.

To satisfy your wishes, there is another scene with same actor but with another uncredited actress Julie-Ann Gillitt gone very wild for us (see caps below).

But I would still rate Sorcha Brook's sex scene is very hot, leaving her bottomless nude.

Both Sorcha Brooks and Julie are TV actress and did BDSM sex scenes in only one movie :(

Thanks for Uschi Digard movie.

I like Uschi Digard because.....

...everyone over the age of 55 or 60 because we were the ones who had nothing but these lust and torture the Beautiful Bitches magazine covers to get-off with!

Yep, you can count me in that group.

I'm looking forward to seeing what you've got.

----------

It turns out that Maria Arnold has also played roles using the name Maria Aronoff (possibly her real name?)

One of her flicks is The Godson which appears on a double-DVD with Below the Belt. I don't remember anything about BTB, but The Godson included a scene with a kidnapped blonde tied between two trailer homes, standing with arms outstretched. It occurred toward the end of the movie at the point where the ransom deal was about to go down. I'm pretty sure the actress playing the victim was NOT Maria Aronoff/Arnold. I probably have some caps of that scene around somewhere but can't put my hands on them at the moment.

----------

It's great when posters share links to images and clips of GIMP interest. Pursuing those links not only leads to great entertainment, but in doing so one can find other topical videos, like the following:

~ (Almost) hanging scene from a medieval movie

~ Scene from I Will Never Die Alone, a movie that was once mentioned on this forum

----------

I came across a Crux Blog with a nice story about crucifixion. Surprise - the story includes an image of our own Amy/Jane in one of her Red Feline scenes. Wonder if she knows that they are using her likeness in this fashion?

And how about the lurid title in the lower left corner?

BTW, I found a poster for it.

Unless it was just an advertising gimmick, it looks like the film was released in 3D! Rape in 3D! Now that's taking advantage of technology and putting it to good use. With all the 3D movies being released today, why can't they do that now?

I'm having a hard time finding links for the movies you review. This looks like yet another film not available on DVD. I'm having to link to a bootleg site if anyone wants to get hold of it. The link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.

Prison Girls definitely sounds like my kind of movie. Does anyone know a legit source for getting a copy of the film?

In fact, the Ralphus post wasn't on the page when I started typing my response to Mr. O. It was nothing more than bad timing -- honest.

Oops. My question about a "legit source" might look like I was casting aspersions on the link Ralphus provided.

No, you're fine. I link to a legitimate source whenever I can, but sometimes they're just not available.

--------------------

BTW, Mr. 0, the clip that Baron von Folter linked to was indeed a good link. I'm not sure why you couldn't play it, but it played just fine for me.

--------------------

And to answer Bill K about the reworked daily pic, no, I didn't do it. I have no artistic talent whatsoever. I admire the people that do, but unless you can do something that looks good, it's best not even attempt it. I have a lot of those men's magazine covers where "artists" removed the clothing and made the women nude, but most are pretty lame and stand out for the wrong reasons, because they look phony. Oftentimes, the original is the one I prefer.

I wonder why those Men's magazine made up all those Nazi erotic women torture stories and pictures for. I know their erotic entertaining but their 100% historically wrong. The Inquisitors and Romans now they did for real those torture gimp methods shown in those Men's Magazines. Why not use them? Bill K.

Ralphus I meant to ask you who did that redo artwork and not that if you did it. Bill K.

And no, the tied up blond in The Godson is not Maria Arnold. Her name is Jane Allyson and that movie is pretty much her only stand-out role. But I really wouldn't look too much into that GIMP scene because her clothes were intact all the time, which was useless and absurd.

Maria Arnold also appeared in Below The Belt as a sex slave sold in an auction & Fantasm as a victim of strip poker. It's too bad her scene in BTB is very short. If I can find any of the picture, I might go into it briefly.

------------

@Ralphus: Thanks for the help, chief, as always. >_<

And yes, I read somewhere that the movie was released in 3D. Oh my, Uschi Digard in 3D?! Drooooooooooooolzzzz!!!

I guess I share your opinion about the sexploitation back in the good old days. Too bad ever since 1992, cheesy B-movies & sexploitation cinema practically died down. I guess good things eventually come to an end. Today, only occasionally we got good gimp scenes like with Maggie Gyllenhaal.

And if the movies I review are hard to find on DVD, I guess we can turn to free downloading. It's a real pity many sexploitation classics aren't out on DVD yet. And even if they are, it's usually a tall order to find them.

And about the link provided by Baron...I dunno, chief, it really does not work from here. Maybe I'll go to an internet cafe when I'm finished with work and try it from there.

--------

@A Canadian: Thank you for the compliment. ^^

information:

the group will be closed for ever in 2 weeks.

if u check out the vidcaps from more than 500 mainstreammovies, pls do it in next 2 weeks.

greets Tarl

...and the impact on multiple generations to this day!

As I became 16 in 1970 and could venture with much initial trepidation into an adult bookstore I immediately was drawn to bondage and then discovered HoM it became my all time favs. What I found is that as I'd fantasize about the women in stringent bondage and "me" being their captor and teaser/tormenter/ravisher I would then do self bondage and try to pretend to have it be "me' that was them. I am to the point that without bondage I cannot orgasm.

I became very proficient at crotchrope bondage mimicking the HoM so artfully displayed with realism, pleading eyes and all the rest that made HoM the best IMHO.

But I wonder how many other nubile young lads did what I did (and many are still doing or starting)... and now today I actively roleplay the crossdresser who is teased, tied, tormented etc?

Lisa Enos. Wow, she is such a beautiful woman. That scene where she is crucified nude at; one of the best things I have ever seen. That hair of hers, there is something about women with short black hair that I can't explain that has an effect on me. From what I read, the story of Snuff-Movie tells about a movie director whose wife is murdered by some Manson family copy-cats. From what I can tell of the scene, it seems he wanted for God to come and "stop him" from giving into sacrifice an innocent woman; he wanted to find proof if God was real or not and he was willing to do something evil just to wake up God's angry justice even if he got sent to Hell. If God ended up real, he would probably wonder how come his wife was not saved?

Anyway, that was one powerful performance by Lisa Enos. Who sadly has not shown her hot body ever since the middle of that decade. Wonder if this was too much and decided to retire, and it is an odd fact that she has 3 children. Wonder what would they think of this LOL. For quite sometime I have been trying to find the only scene in HD to have her nude: http://cndb.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=42070 but to no avail. Can someone get it? The film itself is hard to find in physical copy, and even more on High Definition (I notice another poster here recently bought a Blu Ray machine. I too wish many of my favorite films get HD upgrades, but it is highly likely they won't as some haven't even made the leap from VHS to DVD).

I am really interested on that other film Agent X. It has another one of my fetishes which is a bit hard to come by, the torture of a female spy. Her tormentor is a true sadist; one must torture female spies for the pleasure of it, not to get information. Female spies are brutally trained to be strong women; and I love to break strong women.

That girl from Saw III was the best thing of the whole movie franchise; as the movies got cheesy with time and repetitive, they would have needed more nude females ready for tortures.

By the way, did the scene with Kathy Kriegel being whipped (or caned; I can't remember clearly); was it ever placed for upload on the whipping database site? It really is hard to find, despite listed in various forums; as Lisa Enos HD non-crucified nude scene. So far I can only do with the image stills from this site: http://elles-se-mettent-nues-pour-nous.fr/planche_photos.php?prog=514&act=1680&typ=1.

That is all for now. Take good care.

Firstly, my profoundest apologies for my tardiness in responding to several of your previous posts; particularly those of July 25th and 8th August.

I have to confess that I was transfixed in front of the television, to the exclusion of all else, enchanted by the success of the British team at the Olympics. Proportionate to the size of our population we won more medals, far more medals, than either the USA or China; although not more than several Caribean nations! And the first Gold Medal ever awarded in women's boxing was one by a Brit! That is us; always the pioneers! Enough, enough.

Apropos of your post of 25th July. I still think that you are in danger of circumscribing your potential achievement if you see yourselves as making films primarily for GIMPers. More on this later.

I have read 'A Defence of Masochism' by Anita Phillips, at the suggestion of the esteemed Ms. Hesketh. I have rarely, if ever, found myself in such complete disagreement with an author. Her experience and/or understanding of masochism is, most definitely, not mine.

More light-heartedly, writing as an art historian, (or should that be Art Historian?), I think that you are being somewhat over ingenious in relating the presence (by implication) of a needle in Vermeer's 'Lacemaker' as a reference to the undoubted violence of his times. In fact, there is no needle visible in the painting. At the centre of the picture are two taut threads. (Do you wish to suggest that V. had a fetish for bondage?). It is V.'s ability to give his works a sacramental quality in the midst of violence that is one of their most powerful achievements.

I have thoughts about future enterprises, apropos of your post of 8th August, but I shall leave conveying these to later. After my lengthy seclusion, I need to regain strength for further e-mails!

As always, my profound thanks to you and your colleagues for your endeavours and my very best wishes for the future.

598 photo albums of damsels in distress. Thanks for the hard work and the good times. Best of luck in the future.

----------

Matt got it right about the villains featured in men's adventure magazines of bygone days. I grew up during that period and it certainly was "convenient" to demonize (regard as demons in human skin) any country/group with whom the U.S. was or had been in conflict. There was a progression of such villains as the years went by. In the late sixties and seventies, drug-crazed "hippie" cults (read: Charles Manson's Family) or outlaw bikers (read: Hell's Angels) were added to the covers as well.

The covers did not portray true stories of atrocities...but that didn't matter. It was easy enough for the readers to believe that, even if they didn't happen, they could have happened. That's because Nazis/Soviets/"Red" Chinese/North Vietnamese, etc. earned their reputations for being scumbags; the atrocities they committed were well-documented, so it was not a stretch for the readers to imagine that these guys were capable of roasting or drowning beautiful girls just for sport.

DGITH not only had full nudity, she was tied in the classic AOH position, and even her ankles were bound together. The girl in Saw 3D had her hands free and was waving them around while she screamed. Yes, she was technically tied because she had a chain around her neck, but visually, that's not nearly as exciting.

It also didn't help that the editor kept cutting away from the action to some unrelated scene, which I hate. It's like someone else changing channels when you've already found what you want to watch. Apparently modern filmmakers think today's audiences must have a dwindling attention span so they have to do all these quick edits. No such problem with the Joanna Brushay scene; they lingered on her struggling in bondage and we saw the entire sequence continuously all the way to its fiery payoff. That's the reason why it's a classic and this other one will never be.

---------------------

Tarl's closing his group: Not so fast, guy. I've had e-mail discussions with Tarl over this and it all boils down to him being afraid because someone posted a news story that Google will put sites accused of copyright infringement lower in their search engines. Which should have no impact on Tribute to Tarl whatsoever. Hollywood is going after sites that are hosting illegal copies of their copyrighted work, which they have every right to try to protect. Except Tarl has NO MOVIES on his site at all, only vidcaps!

Hollywood couldn't care less if someone posts a picture from one of their movies on the Internet; if anything, it's good promotion for them. I told Tarl he has nothing to worry about, but English is not his first language and he's afraid he's somehow going to get in some kind of trouble. I told him he can turn it over to someone else if he wants out. I won't let him close it down; heck, I'll even take over as moderator for him just to keep it alive.

Tribute to Tarl is an Internet treasure that cannot be easily replaced. We'll see if he changes his mind. If he goes through with this, it will be a huge mistake.

---------------------

Andrea Goodnight: Great to hear from someone new on this site that carries the extra X chromosome; every now and then we hear from women but it's not as often as we like. I'm sure Blakemore will be glad to read of yet another fan of his HOM work from the 1970s and early 80s. He certainly inspired me when I was a young man and discovering bondage. Even today, his work still stands out as being some of the best extreme bondage ever put to film.

---------------------

Guymanseven: I have the Kathy Kriegel clip from La Vouivre; unfortunately it was sent to me while I was racing to get the Electro-shock Database finished on time and I never got back to it. I'm really behind on getting whipping scenes capped and added to the database. Thanks for the reminder; I'll try to get it added real soon.

Sexy Chinese executions by gunshot. I love the way they are tied up and how they are covered with humiliating signs.

A lot is hosted here but it is paysite:

http://book12archives.net/?cat=7

That was another recurring theme in this kind of magazine. Guy gets captured by a group of nymphos who tie him up and have their way with him. Not sure why that particular fantasy had such a hold on readers of these mags.

http://www.stakedamsels.com/forum/download/file.php?id=8081&mode=view

Bill K.

There has been some discussion recently, in which you have participated, about possible subjects for your next films. A second 'Inquisition' film, favoured by several, obviously provides multiple opportunities for those scenes of nakedness, cruelty and torture in which we GIMPERs delight,(and which you and your colleagues do so well). Further there is a given moral context in which to explore issues of innocence; and its loss; injustice, persecution, loyalty, etc., issues, by engaging with which, the audience must empathize; certainly with the victims, perhaps with the persecutors.

However, the heroines so far are passive victims. And the plots of 'Le Marquis' and 'Dead but Dreaming' (the condition of vampirism being hereditary!) seem also to leave little possibility of moral responsibility for the 'heroine'.

I would urge you to explore an altogether more profound, though difficult, dimension; one that is truly tragic. But a tragic 'heroine', (I assume that your protagonists will continue to be women?!), must be morally active, morally responsible. Only if this is so can the defining psychological/emotional characteristic of tragedy be achieved; catharsis. You have a willingness and bold capacity of exploring the body in extremis. And I am assuming that you wish to measure your ability to engage with the most demanding and profound of artistic genre.

Now, not all tragedies involve such situations, (but many do, of course), but many involve the death of the hero/ine and the more cruelty, suffering, pain and torture (emotional as well as physical) involved in that death the greater the possibility of the fear, terror, horror and resultant pity that are involved in that catharsis.

I am not saying that you should strive to rival the Greek tragedians or Shakespeare. (But why not? I am sure that Ms. Hesketh could/would rise triumphantly to the challenge of being a latter day Antigone or Medea). So I urge you to contrive narratives in which the protagonists are morally engaged and active, very possibly morally flawed (hubris?), but responsible for their fates.

I have to confess that I have given a little time attempting to devise such narratives in the context of the kind of films that you make, so far without success. It is not easy. But I am sure that the collective talents of you and your colleagues can achieve such a goal.

Should you wish to do so, of course!

As always, my warmest thanks and best wishes.

Directed by Lee Frost and starring two former Playboy Bunnies, Maria Lease & Kathy Williams, this movie is often considered the one that started the Nazisploitation sub-genre just like how The Immoral Mr. Teas (1959) started the whole sexploitation and nudie-cuties genre ten years prior. And among the general moviegoers, it is known to have what may very well be one of the biggest amount of nudity ever seen in Nazisploitation movie and total B-movie cheesiness.

Beforehand, I'll introduce you to the lovely Maria Lease:

And Kathy Williams:

The movie is told in flashback; it tells us the story of two female US soldiers assigned to infiltrate a concentration camp during World War II. The two female leads fortunately have girl next door qualities in them so at least being assigned to a camp where the Third Reich supposedly concentrate their female victims is believable. Unfortunately, despite having a nice rack & an attractive face, both girls never had their careers took off in the sexploitation cinema and join the likes of Maria Arnold & Laurie Rose as some of the most underrated names in the history of Sexploitation cinema.

Cut to the good part, we first see the two ladies being briefed by their superior of the mission. The boss told them the risks of this job and the sexual threat they might be facing, but they look tranquil most of the time (for whatever reason).

Their mission is to retrieve a woman held in the camp, and supposedly, this woman has vital information about the Nazis (trivial, won't dig deeper to it). After being given casual clothing, both women are ordered to change their clothes in front of the boss (and the rest of the male members in the room). Maria was the first to ask "Here?", but the boss simply told them this would make a good practice for what they might be facing in their mission. They ask nothing more and proceed to substitute their uniforms with their new clothing, including their underwear. Men, don't you just love it when hot girls obey a kinky order?!

Of course all the men get an eyeful, lucky them! The glorious B-movie cheesiness also plays a part where for some unknown reason Maria chooses to neglect her new bra, all the while where the boss shows them the map of the camp which seems to be done by a six year old.

The day after, they join a group of young women dropped inside the camp and are greeted by a guy who seems to be the second in command in that camp (let's call him The Captain). The Captain tells them they are here for an honorable job of being used by the Third Reich, before proceeding to spray them with water with the help of his soldiers. Wet, the women are taken to the head honcho I call The Commandant. While The Commandant is reminding them of their primary function, you can see how the men are smiling (why wouldn't they?) and the women are actually looking uncomfortable (I'm guessing due to their cold and wet clothes, and probably the pressure of having to take them off). Hey, who says sexploitation movies have bad acting, huh? The Commandant insists on the women undergoing a thorough medical search and orders them to divest their clothing once the doctor is present. With the men keeping their smile and giggles, we watch how the ladies strip.

And stand quietly in queue.

It comes to me upon watching this scene that Maria & Kathy aren't the only ones involved in a business where being nude is necessary because they seem confident removing their dignity. Once they're completely nude, only one of the girls looks bashful by covering her box area. The rest looks comfortable enough placing their hands where their privates can still be seen. The shy one got picked for the first search but she freaks out and has to be removed.

And I think now I know why Maria chose to neglect her bra! She doesn't need it in the first place, so why bother wearing it, right?! Silly me! Good thinking, babe! >_<

The Commandant picks another one, Maria, and the doctor searches the inside of her buttocks and vagina, while two soldiers hold her on The Commandant's table.

Though we're not shown the actual penetration, we are thankfully shown the reaction and the upper torso of the lady, so I cannot say it's a really bad deal. The Commandant of course promises to the victims their first day is nothing compared to what truly awaits them. Guys, don't you love it when the bad guy says it that way?!

The women are only given one piece robes as their clothes and they are send to their room (or should I say jail) which they share with a half dozen other women. While exchanging stories of their experience in the camp (Cliché 101), The Commandant barges in with his soldiers and points out one of them girls as a violator of a certain rule which I don't really care and remember. The poor girl is tied arms over head to a wooden horse...WITH HER FREAKING CLOTHES ON!! Why?!

Oh, man, I must tell you this is a wasted chance because she doesn't need that robe anyway. What a waste! After doing this blunder, the Nazis warn the other girls not to try and give her a drink, but eventually Maria attempts to do so. The Nazis of course stop her from doing her deed. The Commandant, in a fit of rage, orders all the women to remove their clothes (which they obey with the same speed when firemen hear a firebell). They are told to pick up buckets they store in the room, one for each one of them, and lift the buckets high. Whoever has her hand go down first will be whipped.

Now, I don't know why the screenwriter chooses to waste another opportunity with this scene. If it were me, I'd have the girls line up and put their hands behind their heads with the same condition regarding the whipping. It makes for more attractive, revealing, and submissive pose with twice the effect of the position.

The only good thing that comes from the scene the screenwriter opts to put in is we get some nice views of their breasts as the camera slowly take turns going around. But that's it. Not even a close-up of their pussies and asses, another wasted opportunity from the screenwriter. I mean, I highly fancy breasts, but why stop there? Why neglect the rest of the privates? Are pussies and asses no longer honorable or available?! Regardless, the scene ends with The Commandant deciding to whip the tired Maria although she hasn't yielded yet.

Later, the girl tied up to the wooden horse finally gives up while The Commandant has her breasts fondled. Nonetheless, he decides to keep her there so her pussy bleeds even more and make an example out of her. There's nothing she or the inmates could do but accept.

The next visit from the Third Reich is for the booty call session. The Captain is more than quick to have his eyes on the two leading girls, but not before letting the man I call The Good Sergeant, the only good Nazi I know, reluctantly choose Kathy for an action. The Captain strips Kathy of her robe and gets some feel out of her before giving her to The Good Sergeant.

Taking Maria's robe, The Captain forces himself on her and proceeds to fondle her body all over plus some kisses on her lips and breasts, deciding he would go with this one. Maria genuinely looks disgusted and even tried to hold him off, to no avail.

Meanwhile, The Good Sergeant actually apologizes to Kathy for having to do this, to which she says "It's okay".

While Maria is having it rough and painful with The Captain kissing her all over her breasts, on top of her with that much weight, Kathy is having it calm with The Good Sergeant, sitting together on the bed while the man explains to her while he enjoys sex, he doesn't enjoy raping people and he has to do this because of a direct order, not because of his relentless lust. Kathy seems impressed and started the coitus by kissing The Good Sergeant.

And this is pretty much the only consensual sex this movie has, because in the rest of the sex scenes the men always force themselves onto the women. We are even shown how what Maria is experiencing is a direct torture with few punches thrown around at her face and her breasts being roughly kissed & groped where Kathy obviously enjoys the sex with the good man.

Perhaps the only minus of the sex scenes in this movie is...THE MEN HAVE THEIR PANTS ON! I mean, what the hell?! What man has sex with his pants on?! Not that I want to see another's man ass (hell no, I'm straight), but I really need to talk about legitimacy here! I mean, can any man here tell me you have had sex with your pants on before?! No, right?

And they're supposed to be Nazis! What Nazi keep his dignity in front of a naked woman, eh?! What the hell were the director and the screenwriter thinking?! Perhaps the only plus from the sex scenes is we are directly shown in close range what is being done to the ladies' breasts and derrieres, so let's say we got some nice scenes as a consolation prize.

We're next shown The Good Sergeant trying to resign from his current post to no fruition. The Commandant shows his nose again when he visits the wooden horse girl for the second time. He takes her down after reminding her that his words are to live by now. He does not hesitate from telling the girl to lick both his boots, which she obeys and does so genuinely. No tricks. I guess some of the legitimacy of the non-coitus scenes in this movie is a plus point. Though, I hope the girl got a good payment for licking the boots.

As an added bonus, we are shown how Kathy thinks of her robe now that the other prisoners are calling her lucky she got a good one:

Next, we are made aware that 4 high ranking Nazi officers are paying a visit to the camp and would like to taste the women. I call them Pervert 1, Pervert 2, Pervert 3, and Pervert 4. The movie shows 5 women, including Maria, being coerced into a room with four beds, three singles beds and one bunk bed.

They are to take their robes off and wait for Perverts 1, 2, and 3 to come and pick which one is going to be done. They do as they are told, with Maria taking the farthest bed from the door, two girls taking the bunk bed and the other two take one bed each.

They sit or lie motionless until Pervert 1 enters & chooses Maria, Pervert 2 enters and chooses the second bed, and Pervert 3 goes in & take both girls in the bunk bed.

Per usual, the men don't take their pants off while enjoying the taste of breasts in close-up with either their mouth or hands. We got a good long scene of this until Maria snaps out and refuses to be raped any further. It doesn't do her any good because The Captain had it with her and drags her to the torture room, where she's forcefully tied in Strappado.

This is the highlight of the movie because from what I gathered, the actress Maria Lease was actually tied in this position for real for the total of 6 minutes screentime. I think, in a way, it shows her dedication to her role however different the role might be.

And not only that, we got a good spanking scene with a whip soon after. The Captain hits Maria's derriere until it turns red and does not hold anything back. Just like the Strappado torture, I've heard that the actress Maria Lease also had to be spanked for real, with the marks visible all over her buttocks.

Her cries and pleas for the entire thing to stop seem really genuine, adding more weight to the news of this being done for real. I really like seeing her cute face under duress and her tatas hanging out in the open. I must admit it was this scene that makes me think Maria Lease is more attractive than Kathy Williams. Both have around equal measurements and attainable "girl next door" looks, but Maria really stands out with what she had to endure in this movie.

Once the torture is done, The Captain decides to leave her in the position for the night to teach her some lesson. Whew, I can only imagine the pain and stress Maria Lease actually endured in her back, neck, arms, wrists, waist, and legs. You go, girl!

After The Captain leaves, the camera pans and shows us there's another woman lying on the floor inside the torture room. I think she's less attractive than either Maria or Kathy, but whatever. She is completely nude, just like Maria, with whipping marks visible on her breasts and stomach. Her ankles are tied together and her arms are tied behind her back. She is the one the soldiers have to retrieve, The Target.

The Target drags herself across the room until she is completely beneath the embattled Maria, allowing Maria to put both her feet above her butt so her pain is lessened. Maria does so gratefully and recognizes her soon, introducing herself as a soldier and telling The Target she's there to help her & in a few days the camp will be raided by the soldiers of the Alliance. Shocked, The Target quickly drags herself away from Maria, causing her to fall and lose her footing, stretching her arms almost instantly which causes her to cry out.

Again, I'm sure this scene is done for real because Maria's reaction doesn't seem like acting to me. She begs The Target to receive her offer, which the Target accepts by slowly dragging herself back beneath Maria and, once more, allowing her to put her feet on her butt. It is implied they stay that way for the night. Now, I think this whole bonding moment, however sexualized, is actually pretty good. I always find it fanciful when two or more girls, nude and restrained, make a connection to each other under the threat of torture. I dunno, I guess I found that pretty attractive to watch. Especially if I know there's no way for them to win against the bad guys, which is not the case here, but still.

At the same night, four girls including Kathy are taken to The Commandant's office, where Pervert 4 is also present. They are ordered to get naked and perform an orgy for Pervert 4's amusement. Thankfully, this is the only "real" sex scene in this movie because all 4 are completely nude (and attractive). We got some good close-up shots and the entire scene lasted around 3-4 minutes. Now this is pretty well done, too bad this is the only one in this movie.

And then we enter the final act of the movie. The climatic scene in the movie is upsetting to be honest. We are shown how the high ranking officers plan an orgy with the girls, but instead of having the girls presenting themselves completely nude, they are purposely given overrated lingerie to wear and only ended up being topless, which is ridiculous.

And then, as the Allied soldiers barge in, we are given the worst shootout in the history of motion pictures, leaving only Maria & The Target to be alive. And that's that.

Now this movie is obviously not to be taken seriously, but the sex scenes feel ineffective with the men having their clothes on. And aside from that, the only torture scene worthy of being mentioned is Maria in Strappado. The bucket scene could have been done better like I mentioned above and letting the wooden horse girl keep her clothes on was stupid.

Notwithstanding, it does have a copious amount of nudity & rape scenes and I actually enjoy this more than any Ilsa series or Italian Third Reich sleaze (except maybe for Salon Kitty). It gets a solid B+ from me. Though to be fair, although there are WIP films in general I'd rate in the A range, I don't think there's any Nazisploitation title I'd rate higher than in the B range.

Today's pic: Nazi, Hippie, Lesbian Bikers. Doesn't get much better. If only Quoom could develop the plot from here.

Although the movie has been discussed plenty of times on this forum, I've never actually seen Love Camp 7. Perhaps it's time I tracked down a copy.

Quick, somebody make this into a movie!

----------

Mr. 0: I don't know if that was the longest review ever presented on this site, but it certainly was fine reading. Oh, and I looked at the pictures too. Absolutely top-notch caps, big and juicy.

Informative too. It's been a long time since I've seen this movie and I had forgotten that Kathy Williams (of Ramrodder fame) played the role of the other female soldier.

Now thats a pic of the day! She must be going to open some extra holes with that knife so all the guys can join in.

I made a "GIMP CUT" of this video. There is more BDSM & less strangle. The more strangle version is on Niche Clips

CANT WAIT GIMP CUT

Good Hunting

MaX CoXXX

Anyone agree with me?

I also agree that if they are going to film people completely naked, they might as well show all of them while they are at it.

I think one of the important factors to consider in comparing these two movies is the years in which they were made: 1969 for Love Camp 7 and 1974 for Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS. Five years doesn't seem like a long time, but back then social and cultural trends were fast-moving (and some were fast-disappearing), so a lot could change in short time. Showing pussy in a movie was once considered a shocking development

Remember, there was a time when even Playboy refused to show pussy...until competition from mags like Penthouse forced them to cave in. (They seem to have gone back to hiding pussy again).

My take on it is that the 1969 movie helped pave the way for the 1974 movie.

As for Maria Lease, she too did most of her acting in 1968 and 1969 -- 15 or her total of 21 films, the last of which was in the very early 1970s. But, unlike Williams, Lease then stayed in the industry and became a writer, director and then a script consultant, and appears still to be active.

I then did a search for one more actress that I always thought was beautiful but have seen in only one film (no, not Rona di Ricci, but she qualified under that description as well). This one was Andria (or Andrea) Savio, who was the female star in the 1983 film Stryker (about the world post-apocalypse). I already knew that she later had a famous husband (she was the fourth wife of Tony Curtis, making her Jamie Lee Curtis's stepmother for the 8 years she was married to Curtis before divorcing), but this time I learned that Curtis had married her in 1984 (when Curtis was 59, just a few years older than Savio). From that I surmise that Curtis must have been a GIMPer who saw Savio and her terrific, if too short, dungeon scene) in Stryker in 1983, decided he had to have her, sought her out and married her the next year.

So that's the rundown on three women who have provided us GIMPers with some good scenes.

* * * * *

Eda: That was an interesting little Where Are They Now type post. I don't recall Stryker, so either I managed to miss it entirely or it was not memorable for me. I'm leaning toward having missed it entirely, as I generally perk up for dungeon scenes. Guess I need to look it up and check it out.

I'm right there with you concerning Rona De Ricci, who made such a memorable splash in The Pit and the Pendulum and then dropped out of sight. I also really miss the glory days of Charles Band's Full Moon Entertainment, which provided some of my favorite GIMP scenes featuring some of the hottest women ever, Sherilyn Fenn and Jacqueline Lovell (Sara St James) being the two who immediately jump to mind. Thankfully, they didn't drop out of sight after a sinlge great GIMP-ish flick.

* * * * *

Max CoXXX: That was a very nice GIMP cut from Can't Wait. I especially liked the bit about storing naked bound victims upside down in a wooden cabinet, to be rolled out and opened up at leisure. Very well done!

* * * * *

Donny: I agree with you!

* * * * *

YikYakker: Well, the years between 1969 and 1974 were critical for me because it was the difference between 14 and 19, and it became much easier for me to feed my developing GIMP habit. At 14 I was already collecting the airbrushed Playboy issues, wondering why *those* areas always seemed to be in such deep shadow. I'm not sure when I finally realized it was heavily airbrushed. But since that was also the Era of the Afro Bushes, I thought the un-airbrushed pictures were vaguely unappealing. Be honest: all you are really seeing in Donny's clips from Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS is... hair. Generally unseen hair, to be sure, but still just, you know, hair. The real appeal of the image is the total nudity. And the GIMP set-up, of course.

John Galt wrote:

That was a very nice GIMP cut from Can't Wait. I especially liked the bit about storing naked bound victims upside down in a wooden cabinet, to be rolled out and opened up at leisure. Very well done!

Right on, glad you liked that. For some reason I like to put Zia in the box. I just need to remember to get her back out more often.

CANT WAIT GIMP CUT

Good Hunting

MaX CoXXX

----------

Today's Pic: Hmph...I don't think they should have let the panthers out to attack those girls. They should have waited until after both had been thoroughly whipped.

I haven't seen Love Camp 7, but after reading your review, I'd like to seek it out. And for those who can't find the movie, I've added a download link for the whipping scene in the Whipping Scenes in Movies Database. I also added an entry for the French movie La Vouivre scene with ugly ol' Kathy Kriegel getting whipped by her dad and brother, while topless.

The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.

--------------------

MaX CoXXX: Can't Wait looks like a lot of fun. It must suck to be you, tying up and fucking girls for a living. And I'm also a fan of keeping victims tied up inside a box. I haven't seen that in too many movies, but I love the dehumanizing aspect of keeping them there like property to be brought out to be used, then put back inside when you're done with them. Well done, sir!

--------------------

So I read a review the other day about Compliance, which Insomniac posted here about a few months ago. This is the movie based on the real-life McDonald's incident from a few years back, where an innocent female employee was forced to perform degrading and humiliating acts by her boss, who was under the impression he was taking instructions over the phone from a real-life policeman. Not so, it was a prank caller, but the abuse went on and on for hours. And this reviewer really likes the film, even calling it the most disturbing movie ever made. Here's the link:

'Compliance,' A Low Budget Indie, Might Be The Most Disturbing Movie Ever Made

This is a movie I've been looking forward to seeing even since I heard about it, but I figured it would never play where I live and I would have to wait for the DVD (which Netflix would ultimately refuse to carry). But I lucked out; this Friday, the art theatre in my city is having a film festival and the movie will be screened for one night only, at 10:30 at night. I'm gonna make the trip out there.

I'm very familiar and intrigued by the story anyway and you certainly can't beat the casting here. Beautiful Dreama Walker, humiliated and nude...and it's a good movie to boot? Oh, yeah, I'll be there.

http://www.stakedamsels.com/forum/download/file.php?id=8093&mode=view

and it was already redo artwork. Bill K.

---------

@A Canadian: Ahahahahah, glad to know that! Good luck finding a copy!

-------------

@Yik Yakker: Well, Ralphus just informed us all it's in the top 5. Good enough for a noob like me. :P

And, if by juicy you're referring to Maria Lease and/or Kathy Williams, I can't agree more! ROFL

And about what Donny said, I don't think showing full nudity in 1969 would have been a problem, really. Love Camp 7 showed full frontal nudity several times in itself. While it doesn't show in the pictures I posted (with the exception of the one where The Captain is checking out Kathy), it's all over the movie. I think 1969 as a whole was the start of showing full frontal nudities with Lee Frost starting Nazisploitation genre and James Franco starting the WIP genre after in 1968 we saw Virginia Gordon going full frontal in her torture scene in The Naked Spur.

----------

@Donny: Thanks a lot. ><

-----------

@Eda: I've heard about Lease & Williams too. At least Lease is still around, as opposed to Williams. But interestingly, their last acting role in their career is in the same movie, Street of A Thousand Pleasures (1972), with both having the role as featured slave girls. Though the movie has no GIMP scene, it may very well be the sexploitation movie with the most amount of nudity in cinematic history, with more than 70 girls featured with no clothes on.

But yeah, we have too many underrated names in sexploitation cinema. I'd love to know where Laurie Rose and Maria Arnold are.

----------

@John Galt: Nice knowing that! Good luck finding a copy! ^^

-----------

@Ralphus: Thanks as always, Chief. Glad to know it's in the top 5. ^_^

Regarding the length, it's not that I deliberately prolong my latest reviews, but if I feel a movie or a motion picture bondage production has a lot to say and give, I feel it's an injustice not to present them thoroughly, both to the product and to GIMP-ers around. Of course if it can be presented within the KISS rule, I'd be more than glad to do so.

And have the best of luck tracking down a copy of Love Camp 7. Truth be told, I have never seen any sexploitation movie fan hating that movie, so I'm sure u'll like it.

http://www.amazon.com/Love-Camp-Uncut-Lee-Frost/dp/B000943HU2

i have the movie - its not really a highlight.

greets Tarl

The necklace looks great hanging there just above her well-defined cleavage. But the emblem is not a swastika...which does appear on her armband. It is, instead, the Iron Cross, a very distinguished symbol of courage which the Germans trotted out only for military campaigns beginning in the early 1800s. There is some debate as to whether it is a variation on the centuries-old Maltese Cross, which stood for courage as well as seven other virtues the Knights of Malta sought to uphold.

The swastika was also an ancient symbol with many different meanings in many different cultures, but like the Maltese Cross, it has unfortunately become associated with Nazism.

The Iron Cross became a favorite of the more "edgy" motorcycle riders in the 1960s and has persisted to this day. But it had nothing to do with Nazism per se...it simply connoted that the wearer was a bad-ass and was not to be tangled with.

In fact, the motorcycle gang pic from a few days ago would have more accurately portrayed the GIMPers wearing the Iron Cross instead of the swastika, like the one the dude with the chain is wearing on his belt buckle.

Lastly, the Iron Cross was awarded as a medal of valor and during World War II had a small swastika embedded in the center; the fact that the Nazi girl is wearing it around her neck attached to a very official-looking band suggests that she did something meritorious in the service of the Reich...or that she got it from some general in exchange for a blowjob.

Uh...don't you all wish I'd just look at the pictures?

I picked an interesting day to have cable news running in the background while I get other work done!

Personally, I'm wondering just what would constitute an "illegitimate" rape, and if it would somehow be less, umm, fun from a GIMP point of view....

http://www.tshirthell.com/miscpages/nsn/newshirt_082012_nsn.php

Honestly, the fact that a Republican said it doesn't surprise me, since their whole platform is basically anti-women across the board. I mean, is this really so much worse than when Rick Santorum said that if a woman got pregnant through rape that she should "make the best out of a bad situation", have the baby and accept it as a gift from God?

Just Saw Yik Yakkers post and couldn't stop myself from chiming in. I find German military history, weaponry and symbols fascinating.

The Iron Cross (ger. Eisernses Kreuz)is indeed a military medal for valor similar to our Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Congressional Medal of Honor. These are military decorations for valor but also for achievement on the battlefield and there are 3 levels. There is the EK2 Eisernses Kreuz 2, EK1 Eisernses Kreuz 1, and Knights Cross, the highest German military honor. There are a bunch of variations as well based on rank. I'm not quite sure what you have to do to get the top ranking, but these are pretty hard to get, like the US Congressional Medal of Honor.

Hitler had an EK1 and EK2 from WW1 which you could frequently see displayed from his left breast pocket. You only wear one. Yes, Hilter was a hero of WW1, that's one of the reasons people actually listened to him. Its like having a silver and bronze star I think. He wasn't Audie Murphy or Sergeant York, but pretty close. He captured six french soldiers single handedly which won him the EK1. It is a Iron Cross suspended from an eagle.

The formal ribbon version of the EK1, WW2 era is probably what this blonde Nazis chick is wearing. The color sequence looks accurate on the ribbon. She could possibly be a spy as women were not alowed in the Wehrmacht or Waffen SS per se though they had non military Iron Crosses. I don't actually know if any women were awarded the Iron Cross, but lets pretend. Clearly she was highly decorated, probably for fucking the secrets out of the enemy, then sent to a life of leisure dumping wasser (or milk ?) on captured cuties.

The Iron Cross itself dates back to the time of the Teutonic Crusaders. It is a decidedly Christian symbol. Many identify this symbol as Nazi, but that is not really accurate. It is the symbol of pre Nazis and post Nazis Germany. To this day the Budeswehr (the German Army) uses this symbol on their military hardware. The Nazis simplified it into a regular equilateral cross during WW2 for their military hardware and of course they were fond of swastikas. They reverted back the the Iron Cross in post Nazis times.

So technically, it not a Nazis symbol at all, though there were some Nazis flags that made use of it, like naval flags. Many Nazis wore them simply because it was a pre-existing military medal from WW1. Part of their Nazis uniforms. This led to the connection with the Nazis. And yes, the Nazis slapped a swastika on it during their time in power. During WW2, many in the Wehrmacht were disgusted at how many Iron Crosses were handed out more for propaganda than for Valor. By the end of the war it had become somewhat less respected. I don't think it exists any longer.

So there you go, more than you ever wanted to know about the Iron Cross.

Scribbler: Yes, Ted Akin made some astonishing claims that a woman generally doesn't get pregnant during a "legitimate" rape and so he wanted to force women to have their rapist babes because they weren't really concieved during a rape. According to him, if she gets preggers, she wanted it or her body would just reject it. Oki Dokie. It's hard to believe someone with such nonsensical, non scientific beliefs could be in a position to be a Senator, but that what's going on here. I can't help but wonder, is he making this stuff up, or did he get this "information" from somewhere?

Rick

Sorry Ralphus, I know that's off topic. I was bad. :(

----------

Legitimate Rape: Reminds me of the young fellows in my day who used to tell their girlfriends that they wouldn't get pregnant if they did it standing up. For real.

Maybe kids (or older guys) still try to use that line today. Never worked for me.

What's the dude coming up with the gun? Captain save-a-hoe? A topless cowboy in loafers? I'm confused!

Good Hunting

MaX CoXXX

Sorry Ralphus, I know that's off topic. I was bad. :(

If you know it's off-topic, why did you post it? We're talking about rape here, and not necessarily politics. We don't need to turn this into a name-calling contest where entire parties get denigrated with vague generalities that don't really apply to the discussion. If you're going to bash someone or something, at least have a reason behind it that corresponds with the theme of the site.

Personally, I think the whole way of thinking about people's attitudes as to what constitutes rape and whether rape victims deserve sympathy or special treatment is quite interesting. We as a group might be looked down upon by others because we like watching rape scenes on video, but I don't think as a whole that we're insensitive to women's plights. And yet the normal stance of the GOP is that if a woman does get raped and becomes pregnant as a result...well, sorry about that, honey. Life sucks, doesn't it? What are you going to name the baby?

Now on Aiken, I"m going to vote GOP this year because I want to have a chance to be able to afford me some GIMP. Anyway, what he said was stupid, but he's not the only stupid politician, we have another one a heartbeat from the White house. The fact of the matter is no matter who wins the SCOTUS isn't overturning Roe anytime soon.

I feel odd admitting I like watching some of the more attractive women commenters sounding off on the subject. Yes, real rape is serious stuff and a crime and I'm against it, as are they. So why do I like hearing them discussing this? I don't know.

My best guess.

Sorry about the long off topic rant=( I have a keen interest in Nazi stuff even though I also despise them. Thats one of the reasons I love this old pulpart.

I also like politics, but this is not the place for it. Scribbler baited the mouse trap and I just ran right in...WHACK!

Peace,

Rick

What do I find in the film - that scene that appeared to be a tongue extraction is nowhere to be found - the inquisitors do not use the cart once, not once - and to add insult to injury the last scene is the lamest witch burning in recorded history - that last is meant for Ralphus.

It is easy to go wrong when you don't do your homework.

Stay well all

It is easy to go wrong when you don't do your homework.

I feel your pain buddy. There are few among us who haven't been down that road. But thanks for the warning.

Just out of curiosity, I looked up Black Death on IMDb.com and noticed that the page has a content advisory, which says:

Sex & Nudity: [Nothing's listed. Well, that's a bad sign right there.]

Violence & Gore:

Graphic violence and depiction of deadly injuries in a 'medieval fashion', several scenes of torture, burnings and the aftermath of the pestilence. The rare scenes of meele [?] combat lead to a fair number of gory shots, including dismemberment and decapitation.
There is one scene where a man's arms are attached to two horses which then are set to pull in opposite directions until his body is pulled apart.

No specific mention of women being tortured. *sigh* Such an original premise, though: witches being hunted down and punished in the belief that they have not caused sickness and death. A very apt commentary on human folly.

They just want to enjoy scaring the shit out of the girl, maybe just burning her feet until she gives up the information they want. But she probably doesn't know anything...that's what makes it fun.

Mr Skin has a brief blog entry discussing the remake news. The blog writer suggests Noomi Rapace in the Debbie Harry role. I hope no one takes that suggestion seriously, but I am hard pressed to come up with a contemporary babe with the smoldering sexuality that Debbie Harry exuded back in the day.

My wishlist would be to expand the torture scenes from the illicit pirate TV station (which will probably end up being a web site in the remake), as well as expanding the kinky sex scene to include more than just needle penetration.

However, I am fully expecting to be not only disappointed but disgusted with yet another lame-ass remake of a classic that should have been left well enough alone. Color me ambivalent.

Yesterday's daily pic: For those of you speculating on what the Nazi's intentions were in lighting the stick of dynamite inside the bound young lady's ass, you should know this was actually a modified version of the original (below)

As you can see, the original artwork not only featured her with her top on, there's also no firecracker, either. The men were using the torch to give her the Nazi version of the Hot Foot. Either way, I think it's a fantastic image, one of my real favorites.

John Galt - a remake of "Videodrome" - history tells us what Hollywood will do with that - simply witness the recent remake of "Straw Dogs".

Ralphus - forgive my nit picking but both yesterday's pic and what you cite as the original are retouches - the original art by John Duillo was featured on the Feb 1965 issue of Man's Epic and the chick on the wall had no nip visible and her panties were in place - a copy of that issue recently sold on eBay for just under $200.00 and is one of my favorites as well - now today's pic by illustrator Norm Saunders is certainly original and in primo condition I might add - there's a guy in Tennessee named Rich Oberg who owns much of the original cover and interior illustrations - I am green with envy - for those interested the original is shown at the above url - seems a shame there was no interior story to go with.

Stay well all

We could have Cable channel 666 showing weekly witch dungeon torture trials and bats execution programs.

Roman Christian torture and fiery execution cable TV weekly programs. Star Trek had an episode like that.

The Nazi thing may be too fresh in the minds of people who had the real atrocities done to them to do that sort of gimp movie.

Just a twisted gimper hint idea to gimper www movie producers. Bill K.

Someone is remaking Videodrome, the bizarre David Cronenberg masterpiece that showed us the extremely kinky side of Debbie Harry that I, for one, fervently wished for.

This is such a bad idea. Very, very bad.

And check out shirtless, pot-bellied Schultz in the background proudly displaying his Iron Cross.

Yes, this will be a fine film.

----------

But getting back to the three versions of the Man's Epic cover - wouldn't it be great if someone with talent (and a lot of free time) would take these covers and make an animated gif?

*heh-heh* Now that's an epic tale.

http://www.stakedamsels.com/forum/download/file.php?id=8101&mode=view

for hopefully your viewing approval. Bill K.

I would, however belatedly, also like to weigh in on the subject of your future projects. Concerning the idea of another Inquisition film, as someone here has already mentioned that risks being seen as a "Maleficarum-2", particularly if Mila and Amy are again the victims (and how would you explain Amy suddenly getting her legs back?). But above all, I believe that would be a mistake for you from the financial point of view. I suspect that as word gets around, particularly word like "The best Inquisition Film ever made", as one reviewer in a main-stream site stated, Maleficarum still has a lot of commercial life left and in fact an accidental mention somewhere may cause another sales bloom, or two, in the future. However, if there is also a Maleficarum-2, much of that residual sales potential will be lost (or diluted across both films).

I have stated my preference for a future film before - a modern-day 'spy interrogation' with a somewhat happier ending: i.e. the subject(s) perhaps may be sentenced to a long incarceration in a women's prison, or - but not death and dismemberment.

However, as it does appear that your 'site of origin', Red Feline, prefers harder stuff, my suggestion would be to find another historical period (which in fact you have already done in "Marquis de la Croix") with a different plot driving the punishment and torture. I first thought would be: how about the Roman period? Now I realize that no matter how much money you make from Maleficarum, you will not be able to rent the Coliseum in Rome for a day as a set, as was done for the last (Polish ~ year 2000) version of Quo Vadis, but very credible stories can be made on a smaller scale.

For example: A Roman mansion (for filming, just having access to an appropriate looking court-yard and some fields, may be enough) with all the usual retainers and slaves... and the 'lady' of the house notices that her husband is looking too long at one of the young female slaves who has blossomed out into a beautiful woman over the last couple of years.

It is time to do something about that, so she accuses of the girl of being a secret Christian. The girl (truthfully) denies that, but there are ways to obtain the necessary confession. Through her suffering and meeting another (or two) girl(s) who really are Christians, while being held for interrogation, she eventually learns to become the Christian she was falsely accused of being at the beginning... and this story really can appropriately end with crucifixion.

My nickel's worth - taking note of inflation.

Ralphus wrote: If you know it's off-topic, why did you post it?

Its easier to seek forgiveness than permission. :)

It's easier to seek forgiveness than permission. :)

One of the smartest bosses I ever had taught me that rule years ago. It has proven to be very helpful.

"What torture would you like to see Amy suffering?"
and then build a plot around that.

I would vote for parrot's perch, any female looks lovely on that position.

http://www.stakedamsels.com/forum/download/file.php?id=8106&mode=view

or something like that. Manip artwork gone where no one as gone before or would what too. Have I gone too far combining two drawing artwork works together? Bill K.

Have I gone too far combining two drawing artwork works together?

Perhaps, but it's an interesting concept: "From the fire into the frying pan." *heh-heh*

----------

Today's Pic: Oh good, I was wondering what "parrot's perch" meant.

I hope that you like it.

I have posted another story. This one, called SWIFT JUSTICE, is very short, inspired by the picture attached to it, so you can read it without investing a lot of time.

I decided to start with a teaser and checked out the picture.

I like it. I'll be sure to give the story a read this evening.

I'll be sure to give the story a read this evening.

Or if you have 2 minutes, you can do it right now.

Looks like a nice database of gimp scenes in movies.
Too bad it doesn't have the clips.

Or if you have 2 minutes, you can do it right now.

I'm a slow reader. And I like to savor the Eda Chang stories.

This is an Augustus post, not just because it's August, but because of its sheer hugeness. I tend to visualize the term Augustus as someone large, rotund, fat, unfairly, I might add, but that's how the image comes to my head. So August, as opposed to July that in my mind is a lean month, is a fat month. So, this post is a fat post.

The post production of Les Marquis de la Croix is proving to be more complex than Jac originally thought. "It's a straight film" he said. "I'll cut it in 5 weeks" he said. Not true. I don't know if it's healthy for the main actor in a movie to be the one to cut it, even if he's considered a great editor and the producer of the movie. Amy wanted to cut it but she was busy with something else when Jac started to get his hands into it and, since he's in almost every scene of the movie, he's probably had a hard time selecting the best shots.

The film is ready but going through some fine cutting and sound mixing. I have all the vid caps now and they all look awesome, it's just that I have too many and selecting from the bunch is always difficult. But I'll be posting many of them. Not now, of course, but in time.

A movie with a BATS scene is in development right now, it will be directed by Amy and it's a modern day story. We plan to produce it early next year. An inquisition movie, however, seems to have a large appeal, the kind of appeal we haven't seen before in our 14 years of making movies. We produced a four part inquisition story, Red Feline Faces the Inquisition, which had a relative success but it was done at a time when we didn't have access to the kind of equipment, technology, etc, that we now have. So, when we finally were able to make a big budget inquisition film, specially after the big push Ralphus gave us, we learned something: A Via inquisition movie has a tremendous appeal.

With Maleficarum our fan base has grown and so has the demand for another inquisition movie.

There's a big difference between liking movies, we like films like The Mark of the Devil, and making movies like this. We know what we like, we don't know how many people out there like the same thing.

When we started the adventure of making our movies of choice, our favorite subject was crucifixion, simply because that's what Jac is passionate about and that's what he wanted to do.

Maleficarum is showing us something different and that's my point. Making a second inquisition movie is not a bad idea and we'd love to do it when the conditions are right. It might be sooner than later.

We're hoping that we'll find some success with our future releases, the income will help us finance future projects.

Thank you for the comment "you folks are putting out some of the best GIMP". That's a great compliment.

Yes, it sounds like everything is running smoothly for us which doesn't mean that we're having an easy ride. It's not like that at all. The success of Maleficarum is helping us make other movies, like Dead But Dreaming. We put a lot of effort and resources into that movie and that investment was possible because of Maleficarum. We'll have to release Dead But Dreaming to be able to recover those funds and make other movies with them.

In addition, Maleficarum is helping us keep the show on the road, it's helping us pay salaries, work on the post production of Le Marquis de la Croix and more.

Other independent producers have to struggle to raise the funds they need for their small productions. We're fortunate that we have a nice fan base that makes that job easier. We are doing in, a very small scale, what film studios do. They produce, sell, and then invest in new productions. They use millions of dollars to do that, we can only do it with tiny amounts. But those tiny amounts are big for us.

If Le Marquis de la Croix is half as successful as Maleficarum, we'll be able to put more into our future productions.

Can we top the best Inquisition film ever made? That's another great compliment right there.

The possibility of a second inquisition movie exists. However, as you pointed out, it would have to be a different movie altogether. Someone suggested a night BATS scene, others would like to have a more impressive fire, you suggest an all consuming fire, it's possible too. The horse, the rack and the roasting, which were done nicely on the first one, would have to be skipped, but there are other equally if not more painful tortures that can be included. The rack is a popular option, but we have in mind a different rack.

The story would have to take place in a different era and location and a mostly different cast for the main roles would be needed, which doesn't mean that some of the actors from Maleficarum can't play different roles.

At this point in time we're completely dedicated to release new films and we have a few scripts in line for production, all of them with good amounts of GIMP, some more than others and at least two possible stories have BATS scenes.

We did/do a lot of crucifixion stories and although some might be repetitious, like The Via Crucis of Camille series which was intended to be repetitious, most are not. Red Room, for instance, is very different from AristoCrux and this medieval story is different from Romana Crucifixa Est and all three have the same lady, Amy/Jane.

We don't necessarily think that the same leading ladies would be a problem, but a totally different story is important. We would never do a Maleficarum 2. Although it's not impossible.

We're keeping our eyes and ears open for new talent, yes.

Jac has at least two scripts involving the Nazis in Bolivia and Amy has one. The problem with Jac's stories is that they cannot be too exploitative because they deal with real life stories, with things that actually happened and all too recently. Some of the people in which some of the characters in these stories are based are still alive. Another problem is that once you tell one story, you told them all. More about this later in this post.

We're not saying that we HAVE to make another inquisition film. In fact we're making movies now that have nothing to do with the inquisition. But the fact is that Maleficarum is showing us something and obviously it makes us think that another inquisition story wouldn't be a bad idea at all.

He had in mind a film with this most interesting subject, one of the characters was a woman whose mother was tortured by Klaus Barbie in France. That part was based in a real story. The woman was suspended from a pipe, she was naked. She was whipped and beaten. That scene would've been in the movie as a flashback.

When Jac took this project to some of the people and organizations that supported his work on Haiti, they nicely and politely refused, one of them was clear: I don't want you to get killed. The main reason for their refusal was that the film was also dealing with the involvement of the military in the drug trade. That was in the late 80's, early 90's. So, the film about nazis, drug lords and military juntas was never made. However, the article and the character behind the article, Jac himself, was used. It happened this way. The producers contacted the magazine to ask permission to use the article as research material for a movie they were making. The magazine said ok, probably got some money, and Jac, along with many of the characters in that movie, were immortalized in Scarface, with Al Pacino. Jac's character is the one Al Pacino refuses to kill.

While in Bolivia, Klaus Barbie, who was known as Klaus Altman, was also involved in torturing those who were in the opposition, one of them, a priest, was killed. A woman who was working with the resistance, was captured and tortured, and eventually released, she was in exile in New York where she met Jac and told him what had happened to her. Eventually that military junta was overthrown, Klaus Barbie was captured and extradited to France where he died in prison.

In some way, Jac got his frustration out when he made Agent X, perhaps inspired on the stories the woman told him.

There's no needle in the painting, but as Monsieur Salvador Dali noted, the needle is the focus of the painting and it's as violent as his, Dali's, rhinoceros horn. There's a book about the times of Vermeer and they were nothing like his paintings. It was a time of religious wars, Catholics and protestants going at each other with feverish relish, and one who was in the middle of it all was Reine Margot, of France, herself, a few years before Vermeer, of course. Those religious wars went on for a very, very long time. It goes to show that Reine Margot and Vermeer had a long relationship.

In Dead But Dreaming the vampires are more like your traditional vamps, who are made by other vamps. The hereditary vampirism story is Amy's next film, Olalla, inspired in the story by Robert Louis Stevenson. She's writing that script as I type this words.

Having said that, the heroines in Dead But Dreaming are anything but passive. They are very much involved in the intrigues of their time and they don't go gently into the dungeons.

Richard I would urge you to explore an altogether more profound, though difficult, dimension; one that is truly tragic. But a tragic 'heroine', (I assume that your protagonists will continue to be women?!), must be morally active, morally responsible. Only if this is so can the defining psychological/emotional characteristic of tragedy be achieved; catharsis. You have a willingness and bold capacity of exploring the body in extremis. And I am assuming that you wish to measure your ability to engage with the most demanding and profound of artistic genre.
Now, not all tragedies involve such situations, (but many do, of course), but many involve the death of the hero/ine and the more cruelty, suffering, pain and torture (emotional as well as physical) involved in that death the greater the possibility of the fear, terror, horror and resultant pity that are involved in that catharsis.

It is clear to us that we're departing from the way we were producing in the past. The limitations we had in terms of funding, equipment, etc, limited our efforts to minimalist but strong movies such as those made with Camille, Gabrielle and Jane, to more dramatic, expensive, elaborate, no longer minimalist productions.

We started with Martyr but it took a while before we could actually begin to produce with larger, if any, budgets. Martyr was a large budget production, in our terms, it involved casting in France for two leading characters, airplane tickets for 6 people from Paris to New York, housing and feeding the entire cast and crew for 6 weeks, buying new equipment, working with rented lights, a gaffer and so on. A large budget. Very different from what Jac was doing since 1998 until then. It was possible because at that time Red Feline was ridding high on the wave of Red Feline on the Cross and the Red Feline Faces The Inquisition series... not to mention the Red Feline Club.

Martyr had a great script where the protagonist, Camille, was morally active and responsible for the entire drama. That film was an introspection of the character. Her fascination with Eulalia the Martyr was at the center of the story and it was the motivation for all the decisions she takes until the very end. I believe that the film was undervalued by many of our fans, so it didn't do as well as the tremendously successful Maleficarum, (always in our terms) but we didn't loose the investment either, in fact it's making a profit.

Martyr explores, with Camille, the body in extremis and also the motivations that make a person take the leap to suffer martyrdom. Intimately, she's responsible for what happens to her and to those around her. She takes them with her into a nightmarish passion play. Martyr is also Camille's search of her inner self, her need to understand the feelings she has, the needs she harbors since childhood, very much an exploration like the one Jac himself had since the very first time, very early on in his live, when he had a strange "feeling" at the sight of a beautiful Martyr.

The actual plan was more grandiose but the budgetary limitations and circumstances of the time... when the ripples of the 9/11 attacks were strongly felt in the economy of a lot of New Yorkers, didn't allow for what it was planned. So, for Jac Martyr is an unfinished piece, even if the film itself is complete, powerful and contains an amazing, out of this world performance by Carmen Paintoux.

Richard: I am not saying that you should strive to rival the Greek tragedians or Shakespeare. (But why not? I am sure that Ms. Hesketh could/would rise triumphantly to the challenge of being a latter day Antigone or Medea). So I urge you to contrive narratives in which the protagonists are morally engaged and active, very possibly morally flawed (hubris?), but responsible for their fates.

I have to confess that I have given a little time attempting to devise such narratives in the context of the kind of films that you make, so far without success. It is not easy. But I am sure that the collective talents of you and your colleagues can achieve such a goal.
Should you wish to do so, of course!
As always, my warmest thanks and best wishes.

There's a sequence in Pasolini's Medea that illustrates, in Pier's particular point of view, what's possible to accomplish with a narrative such as the one you describe. In this sequence we go from a cave, a fantastic location, where a young man is suspended by his wrists, and he's taken out to be crucified. It's a powerful scene, even if the victim in this case, is a young man. A beautiful young man, I should add, with almost feminine qualities to his body. The sequence goes from a minimalist scene, evidently inspired in the ciaro/oscuro technique mastered by Caravaggio, to an almost surreal exterior where the execution takes place.

There's, in fact, one opening scene in Dead But Dreaming II that's a bit similar to that masterful sequence.

We prefer to integrate a GIMP scene in the context of the narrative, instead of the other way around. We're not building the narrative around the scene, not on these movies. Not even in Martyr, where it appear the narrative is built around the martyrdom of Eulalia. The martyrdom IS the narrative. In the case of Le Marquis de la Croix, the suffering of Zinga, the heroine: a wretched creature taken from one misery to the next; the toy of villainy; the target of every debauch; exposed to the most barbarous, the most monstrous caprices ... IS the narrative. In Malericarum the torture of the accused is the narrative. However, in Dead But Dreaming the suffering of the heroines is not the narrative, it's part of it. The narrative is not built around their suffering.

If we were to make Medea, we would most possibly turn it on its head. And yes, Amy could very well meet the challenge of becoming a latter day Antigone.

Funny you bring up Manuela Saenz. Jac has a script that deals with her life and that of Simon Rodriguez, the teacher and friend of Simon Bolivar. Manuela was Bolivar's lover, one of many, she died peacefully of old age, dreaming of her man. She was a heroine, of course, like many other women of that time some of whom were tortured in killed.

In Dead But Dreaming, Amy's Character, Moira, is based in one such heroine of the war of Independence of the South American territories. Moira is of Irish descent, related to Bernardo O'Higgins, an Irish military man who led the forces that liberated what is now known as Chile. The war of independence in South America had three main liders, Bolivar, from Venezuela, O'Higgins, from Chile and San Martin from what is now known as Argentina. They were in communication, of course, and Moira, our heroine in Dead But Dreaming is a carrier of messages and money for the rebels. She secures the construction of cannons and the purchase of weapons, not to mention the financing of the rebel's attacks on the Spaniards. She's captured, of course, and her fate is sealed.

Last night (Wednesday 20th) a new film, The Mountain Within, starring Amy and Jac was premiered at the Cinemateca, the same Cinemateca that censored Maleficarum. In the last row of the screening room. three film directors were sitting, watching the film, Jac, Amy and Paolo, an Italian film director who introduced the film. A night of celebrities.

The screening went very well. The very unusual, experimental film pleased the audiences. It was shot in super 8mm, B&W and it runs for 40 minutes. The texture and old school quality of the film gives it a flashback feeling. In this film Amy plays a tourist that undresses in front of a glacier up in the 8,000 mts above seal level mountain.

It was freezing cold during the shooting and yet Amy took her shirt off. What looks like dirt in this picture is dirty ice, tons and tons of ice, millennia old ice that, sadly, is melting away. Amy, in the film, represents the ideal of Liberte, Egalite, Sexualite. It's a 60's movie made in the twenty first century, very cool indeed. It is now playing theatrically.

Lynn: Dear Margot, I would, however belatedly, also like to weigh in on the subject of your future projects. Concerning the idea of another Inquisition film, as someone here has already mentioned that risks being seen as a "Maleficarum-2", particularly if Mila and Amy are again the victims (and how would you explain Amy suddenly getting her legs back?). But above all, I believe that would be a mistake for you from the financial point of view. I suspect that as word gets around, particularly word like "The best Inquisition Film ever made", as one reviewer in a main-stream site stated, Maleficarum still has a lot of commercial life left and in fact an accidental mention somewhere may cause another sales bloom, or two, in the future. However, if there is also a Maleficarum-2, much of that residual sales potential will be lost (or diluted across both films).

As I mentioned before, we would not be doing a sequel to Maleficarum. That's not in our plans. A vastly different inquisition movie, however, it's not only possible, but almost mandatory. But it's not something that we would be doing it this year. We don't have a script for that, only ideas that linger around Jac's head.

Maleficarum has a lot of commercial life left in it, as you pointed out, and we're very happy about that. There are some possibilities of festivals, believe it or not, so the last word on Maleficarum is not out yet and it won't be for a very long time. In fact, the life extent of a film never really ends. We're having a revival of sorts with other movies because of Maleficarum. Red Feline on the Cross, for instance, is still selling.

I found the following picture in Facebook, of all places, I thought I saw Amy in it. That could very well be a scene in a new Inquisition movie. What do you think?

The spy and roman period settings are in our plans and not only in one movie or two, but several.

One of the soon to be produced films have a spy scenario and another has the Roman/Greek crucifixion scenario as well. We're even looking into the possibility of renting a Roman villa for a movie, even if that Roman Villa is in Rumania, where there are remnants of the Roman Empire, as there are in many parts of Europe.

We're also finding out that it would not be very expensive to rent a castle in Scotland or France for a couple of weeks. There's one I saw in Hungary, not long ago. Last year, in fact.

Quo Vadis, the polish film, was not shot on the Roman Coliseum, it was shot in Poland, in a small Roman Circus that was made to look like the Roman Coliseum with the help of gigantic Green Screens that were positioned around the Roman Circus.

We have some material resources as well as lots of collective imagination and means to bring a project to life. That is something we learned in the last couple of years. Before Maleficarum we weren't sure if we could pull something like that off. A big production, with a large cast, costumes, locations, props. We did it! and better than we thought we could, and with what is considered a micro budget, and the results are obvious to us now. We're no longer in doubt of what we can do. We only need to figure out what, when and where. the how comes easy now.

We're not going crazy or anything like that. We're not over enthusiastic of frightfully optimistic. No. We know better. This is not only our passion. It is our way of life and our way of making a living. We're not into high risk projects with little to show for at the end. We have an estrategy, one we hope will work out.

darknessmonger Why not make it a poll:
"What torture would you like to see Amy suffering?"
and then build a plot around that.
I would vote for parrot's perch, any female looks lovely on that position.

More than a poll I think it would be a list.. If you really think about it, what hasn't Amy gone through yet? There's still a lot she can encounter in her torturous path, but the list is getting shorter. After being crucified, whipped, strangled, electrocuted, drowned, beaten, burnt with hot irons, racked, roasted, burned at the stake and so on and so forth, and many of these tortures she suffered many times over, ... what's left? In Fantom she has a kind of a parrot's perch scene. She mentioned, a few hours ago, that she wouldn't mind going through that experience a few more times.

Jac has two escenarios where Amy can be in that position. One is a parody of a well known 60's movie which I shall not name yet, it's a surprise, and another is a jungle girl type of movie set in the Amazon's where Amy is captured by natives and rescued, temporarily, by a jungle girl .. who later pays the price of her daring action.

So, let's have a poll and see what woes we can bring upon poor Amy.

Dear Blakemore. It was a bit of a surprise to read your post directed to me. There's a 8 mm film in our archives, The Tourist Trap, that Jac got when he was a film student in New York. Money was an issue for him back then, but he was willing to pay a big part of his week's salary to buy it. Never in his wildest dreams could he have imagine that one day you would be in contact with us. Back then he was toying with the idea of doing something like that but he had no idea of how to get into it, where to go with his ideas. A very young man, foreign, in a big city... not an easy place to be.

I will respond to your post in time and most likely privately. I have to say that it was great to hear from you and that we love and respect your work.

Until next time!

Reine Margot

Now if Margot's posts were like Eda Chang's latest story, we wouldn't have any problems at all :)

Thank you!

Among (many) other things, your post bestirred me to look up the movie La Reine Margot. Mmmm...Isabelle Adjani. Was there any movie in which she did not have a nekkid scene?

I dig these period dramas. The titular queen is one Margaret de Valois, daughter of Catherine de Medici. The action takes place during the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre, which, typically, took place during a time of religious conflict, between Catholics and Huguenots. Lotsa violence. But the key question is: does this movie have any GIMPage?

You wrote:

If you really think about it, what hasn't Amy gone through yet?

I've enjoyed all of Amy's crucifixion scenes - the ones I've seen, that is. But the torture I looked forward to seeing most was the whipping on the Spanish horse (horsewhipping?) in Maleficarum. Amy did not disappoint; but it's clear - from her description and yours - that scene was very difficult for her to do. I wouldn't want to see her try anything more painful and dangerous than that.

----------

Daniel: You might try the links on the Brian's Page website - lots of sites about ropes there.

----------

Yes, this girl really does look like our Amy. She is certainly the most attractive victim in the picture. Amy once said she didn't mind getting her feet dirty. ;)

Today's Pic: Nice...Hollywood glamor girl with ripped blouse and bare feet. Sorry to be a nitpicker, but...

~ Assuming that the suave young SS man is not the figure before her but the partially obscured menace behind her, shouldn't her glance be backwards and to the right? It would make the picture cooler, I think, to have her looking up and over her right shoulder. Maybe I'm making the wrong assumption here.
~ Or should she be looking downward and behind her, at the ominous, protuberant object held by the guy on the left?
~ Although her wrists are bound together, the girl herself appears not to be tied to the chair.
~ If she really had spent a month being mistreated by the SS, would her hair still have that just-left-the-salon look?

Just saying.

I do like the way the chair is high enough that she has to bend her feet to touch the floor. Well done, that.

----------

One more post about Amy: Omigod...topless in blue jeans!

If you really think about it, what hasn't Amy gone through yet? There's still a lot she can encounter in her torturous path, but the list is getting shorter. After being crucified, whipped, strangled, electrocuted, drowned, beaten, burnt with hot irons, racked, roasted, burned at the stake and so on and so forth, and many of these tortures she suffered many times over, ... what's left?

Well, since you're a fan of Blakemore's work, how about hanging Amy upside-down, like in one of my favorite HOM loops, Rope Burn? I've always like the "piece of meat" symbolism of doing that to a bound woman, and since Amy has long hair, it would be cool to see her hair brushing the floor as he turns and swings his helpless captive. Something like this:

BTW, you asked about that Facebook picture. I immediately recognized it as coming from the artist Nicolay Bessonov. According to his website, he did this particular work back in 1990, when Amy would have been about 8 years old. But I agree, there's definitely a resemblance. Perhaps he was psychic?

Markee wrote:

Ralphus, did you see Compliance? If so what was there any spanking in it? If so please describe!

I'm working on a review of Compliance; look for it the very near future.

I have a few thoughts concerning the current discussion of Amy's role in future films.

But first about the photo of her at the foot of the glacier. FEEBLE!

In any such circumstance the woman must be completely naked. Yes, of course, it was cold; that is the point. Where is the GIMP, SM charge otherwise?!?! Do not be such a wimp, Amy. It would have been even more fun if you had been made to roll around in the snow and ice.

And if you are going to wear your jeans, you must be properly naked to the waist. Far too many scenes are ruined by the 'victim' having her tits hidden by braids of hair.

It can be and is sexy if the victim starts off with some modesty preserved, but then the 'abuser' should pull the hair away and push it behind the back, exposing tits and teats for whatever. And, in such circumstances Amy, you could have retained your hat. You would have looked extremely cute, entirely naked but wearing a woolly hat!

Now about further 'tortures' that Amy might endure.

The fact that she has been whipped once, branded once, racked once; seems to me to have no bearing on what future ordeals might be inflicted. To hold that no torture may be repeated seems to me like arguing that you do not have an exquisite gourmet meal a second time or listen to a great piece of music again. Speaking for myself, I would delight in seeing Amy whipped, racked, branded, etc., etc., over and over again. How can one tire of seeing such a body in torment?

For those that are easily bored, the details of the position could be altered. For instance, future Spanish Horse episodes could be varied with hands tied behind the neck; legs in a different position; different additional tortures inflicted while Amy is on the Horse.

I would very much enjoy another 'roasting scene'. (Incidentally, I am entranced by the 'detail' of the rope tied so that it penetrates deep into the mouth. A delightful example of casual, but exquisite, cruelty!). At least, a second such scene could be filmed better to meet Ralphus' desires. There are not so many such scenes that there is any likelihood of the 'public' becoming bored!

Amy has, of course, declared that the suffering involved in filming that scene was such as to preclude a repeat. But, listening to all the videos, she clearly leaves open the possibility of a repeat performance.

I am sure that Amy's masochistic soul responds powerfully to the anticipation of the filming of such ordeals (why write such scripts otherwise); repeated ordeals (e.g. Spanish Horse) for which the challenges are known as well as those not yet experienced.

And, of course, the scheduling of another roasting scene would have a very special quality for Amy. To be the sole authority for submitting oneself to such a real masochistic and submissive experience; to be filmed and published to the world! Lucky woman!

I would very much enjoy another 'roasting scene'. (Incidentally, I am entranced by the 'detail' of the rope tied so that it penetrates deep into the mouth. A delightful example of casual, but exquisite, cruelty!).

The rope through the mouth was my idea. I sent her this picture of Christina Carter as an example and she agreed to do it. The rope was to be looped through her mouth and around the framework, serving as a gag. I like the helpless look of a strap or rope pulled through the victim's mouth. It's something she can still talk through (and better, scream and cough through!) but it adds a bit to the imagery. And as you can see, she looked great that way.

And, of course, the scheduling of another roasting scene would have a very special quality for Amy. To be the sole authority for submitting oneself to such a real masochistic and submissive experience; to be filmed and published to the world! Lucky woman!

The scheduling of another roasting scene is going to be on 12th of Never and that's a long, long time. In other words, there's not a chance in yours or my lifetime that Amy will ever willingly get up on that spit again. Enjoy the roasting scene we got; that'll be the only one.

----------

Since Amy is willing to take her shirt off in Glacierland, I think the next logical step is snow bondage.

I saw Compliance this past weekend; it was a one-time only screening as part of a local film festival. I was already very familiar with the real-life case that it was based on. Years ago, the video from a national news magazine show made its way to this discussion forum, invoking a large number of comments.

It's real easy to find out what happened in real life; the video is on YouTube multiple times in various edits; the longest version I found is at this link. And this movie, while changing the actual names for legal purposes, pretty much follows the story beat for beat. This review assumes you know the story, but if you want to be surprised beforehand, don't click on the video and stop reading now because I'm going to give stuff away. You've been warned.

The film is based on an incredible true-life incident in which a prank caller phoned a small-town fast food restaurant and pretended to be a police officer, telling the manager Sandra (played by actress Ann Dowd in an amazing performance) that one of the female workers there has stolen money from a customer's purse. Using the vaguest of descriptions to identify her (19-years old, blonde hair) he tricks the manager into pulling Becky (the beautiful Dreama Walker) off the floor and confronting her with the allegation. Of course, the innocent girl knows nothing and denies having taken anything. But the voice on the phone is very insistent and authoritative, and the manager, believing he's really a cop, follows his every instruction.

After going through her purse and not finding anything, the officer tells Sandra that she must strip search Becky. Both women object and feel that's going over the line, but again, the man on the phone tells her it's either that or Becky will go to jail.

At this point, the humiliated Becky reluctantly agrees to take off her clothes. It's a pretty revealing scene, watching this cute girl wearing a uniform suddenly revealing herself to be a beautiful young woman, exposed for all to see. She is forced to get fully naked, but the camera slowly pans away as she strips off her panties.

But even though no money was found, it's not over for Becky, not by a long shot. The caller orders Sandra to put Becky's clothes and cell phone into a bag and take it to her car to be collected later by the police. Becky is given only an apron to cover herself and left alone in the office, unable to go anywhere.

And it gets worse. The fake cop tells her to get a male to watch her while Sandra covers the evening rush. She calls the only man she feels she can trust...her boyfriend Van, who's had a few too many beers that evening but still comes down to help out. And with Sandra gone, the perv on the other line takes it to the next level, telling Van to perform a cavity search on Becky (implied only) and then make her jump up and down and do jumping jacks to supposedly dislodge the money she's hiding. We do see some more topless nudity during this scene, although Becky turns her head to the side in shame as she's going through the humiliating ritual.

There's a point in the film where the fake cop talks to Becky on the phone and she stops protesting and sort of gives up, realizing that no matter what she says or does to proclaim her innocence, it's not going to matter. She's resigned to whatever's going to happen to her, which is why she doesn't protest when he tells her she's going to be punished for not cooperating, and then she's going to "do something nice" for Van to thank him for doing a good job. I think we can all guess what that means.

She hands the phone off to Van, and while he's clearly not comfortable with what he's told, he nonetheless agrees to bend Becky over his knee and give her a spanking. He even suggests to the caller that he could put the phone on her back so that the caller can hear every swat. And of course, the sadistic man on the other line thinks that's a great idea.

This scene is not shown explicitly; I don't recall seeing any bare ass cheeks, but we see Becky's pained reaction to the beating. She doesn't cry out or scream; like I say, she's sort of resigned to her fate.

The oral sex scene is again only implied, and at the end, there's no satisfaction at all from Van, who can't even talk to Sandra when she returns. He goes out to his car and calls one of his buddies, telling him, "I did a bad thing".

And the look on Becky's face afterward is truly heartbreaking. You have to feel sorry for this poor girl and question how in the world all this could have happened to her. But it did. All because of a sick prank caller getting his jollies at the expense of real people's lives.

The ending of the film will have you shaking your head in disbelief. I won't give it away any more details, but what's revealed is pretty astonishing.

And sorry guys, this is not an exploitation film. I've come to expect that in 2012, that era is sadly long over. And even in the screening I attended, about 10 people got up midway through and left the theatre. I can just imagine how many would have left had it been sexually graphic. And this is one time when I actually agree that the filmmakers made the right decision. A film doesn't have to be loaded with nudity to be compelling entertainment.

And if the focus has been on nudity and humiliation, it would have missed the point. Despite the subject matter, it's ultimately a film about following authority. It's a powerful indictment of the human condition...why is it so easy for us to obey orders even though we know they are wrong? What would I have done in that situation? What would someone else have done? If this were a fictional movie it would be hard to believe, but the characters aren't stupid and at no time does the story ring false, even as the situation becomes more and more outrageous. With the exception of the fake policeman on the other line, there are no bad people in the film, even though they ultimately do reprehensible things.

The acting is superb all around by a cast of mainly unknown actors, from the leads down to even the most minor characters. I came to see Dreama Walker get naked and ended up being blown away by her outstanding performance as the unfortunate victim. Her scenes with Ann Dowd are especially poignant because both come across as sympathetic characters, but for obviously different reasons. Sandra is a sad, middle-aged woman who's truly just trying to do what she feels is the right thing. If the Academy Awards paid attention to independent films, she would be a shoo-in for Best Actress. But the film itself is too dark and too disturbing for mainstream attention. Nonetheless, it's definitely one to seek out. You won't forget it any time soon.

My grade: A

I am delighted to thank you 'publicly' for being initially responsible for Amy being mouth-abused in the 'roasting scene'. As I have written, it was for me a very powerful addition to an already outstanding sequence.

I still think that, if you watch the five(?) videos that Amy posted in response to queries from GIMPers, she goes from a position of utterly rejecting filming another roasting scene to a position where it becomes in her mind a possibility; albeit remote.

However, I assume that you are in contact with her, Margot et al. outside this site, so you should know! But Amy can tell us herself if she wishes.

What can we do, what can we offer, Amy, to persuade you to suffer again so acutely for your art?

I'm with James Bond on this one, 'Never say never'!

GOP Anti-Porn Plank Added To Draft Platform By Republican Committee

Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction. If we didn't know it really happened, we might find it preposterous. I feel badly for everyone who was victimized by this guy.

But it's very courageous of the cast and production crew to bring us a movie like this.

Dreama Walker is aptly named. She's like the girl-next-door of your dreams.

----------

Scribbler wrote:

Is anyone here anti-porn?

My favorite term from this article is "porn-induced sexual dysfunction."

It's the Viagra problem for guys in their 20s, Trueman said. Young males are now spending 10 to 12 years looking at porn on the Internet and masturbating to it, so when they are getting married, they are dysfunctional sexually because their brain maps are changed. They enjoy what they've been doing for 10 to 12 years. Normal sex is not something that gets them excited.

Gosh, I wonder what peer-reviewed scientific journal that came from?

Further...

The new language replaces previous platform wording, which only opposed child pornography. It will now read, "Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced." Trueman noted that current federal obscenity laws not only prohibit distribution of hardcore pornography on the Internet but also on hotel/motel TV, on cable/satellite TV, and in retail shops.

Next they'll be calling for mandatory palm-inspections. So much for getting government out of our lives.

----------

Amy Hesketh: How does it feel to have people coming up with all kinds of creative ways to make you miserable? ;)

I agree with Robert that a movie with a jungle (or wilderness) motif would be interesting. It would provide an opportunity to do a "parrot's perch" with a long wooden pole. Something with a Jess Franco flavor to it, only better.

* * * * *

Margot: Awesome post, as usual. I think it is funny that there is a limit as to the size Dreambook will accept, and honestly I am just happy that you discovered it instead of me. I suppose that will win you a Ralphus Year-End Reward for some category.

I for one am very glad about the GOP's "enlightened" view on pornography, and their extremely scientific rationale for opposing it. I'm glad that they're concerned about the virility of our young males, perhaps now they will support funding for sex education in high school, and affordable birth control for anyone who desires it! What's that, GOP cavemen? You won't do those things? Awww!

Also, way to support small business and free entreprise, things that the Republican Party pretend to understand. But they don't really understand it, otherwise I'd be able to follow my lifelong dream of starting a cannabis and pornography emporium, with an abortion clinic in the back. Reminds me of that old saying about how the Republicans want the government to be just small enough to fit in your uterus.

I want to start on a positive note and thank you for the great review and the nice caps (where did you get them from?). The review was an entertaining read and I feel I have a good sense of the film's merits.

That said, I am more than a little angry that you have posted what you claim is an official Ralphus Review. Impersonating another person -- particularly the site's moderator -- is a violation of the rules. It isn't allowed on this forum.

And it is clear that you, sir, are an imposter.

How do I know? Simple. There's no way the "real" Ralphus would have written something like this:

And sorry guys, this is not an exploitation film...I can just imagine how many would have left had it been sexually graphic. And this is one time when I actually agree that the filmmakers made the right decision. A film doesn't have to be loaded with nudity to be compelling entertainment.

Agreeing with the decision not to make an exploitation film? Ralphus wouldn't say that in a million years. It's time for you to come clean.

Agreeing with the decision not to make an exploitation film? Ralphus wouldn't say that in a million years. It's time for you to come clean.

Ha! It was really me. I know, doesn't sound like something I would write. It's almost like you recommending a movie where a girl actually gets tied up. I mean, things like that just don't happen, do they?

Don't get me wrong. I would have loved to have seen Dreama Walker get naked and stay naked for the whole movie. But I'm also a realist and I know films like that do not get made...or distributed...in this day and age. Okay, maybe overseas, but not in the states and definitely not in 2012. If the filmmakers had done a movie like that, they would never get backing and they would never find a theatre to screen it.

And like I wrote, it would change the focus to a film all about nudity and not about what the true story was ...blindly following "authority" even when you know it's wrong. It's a challenging film that makes you think about your own choices. A film that makes you think...and titillates you along the way with nubile bare boobies. How could I not love that?

--------------------

BTW, how did I find the nude vidcaps? Believe it or not, Google. Funny thing is they weren't there Sunday when I wrote the review, but they had shown up when I was polishing it Monday night. And now Tuesday as I'm writing this, the picture I found is now gone from the Google search engine, but new ones have shown up. The link in my Homepage URL currently has 4 nice montages of Dreama being forced to strip down...but grab them now because they may not be around for long.

Bill K: According to the IMDB, Compliance is "Coming Soon", in theaters September 26. I have no idea how wide a release it may get; it's still an independent film so maybe in art theatres and not much else. I'm just glad I had a chance to see it early (in an art theatre, incidentally).

--------------------

The GOP War on Porn: Ho hum, that's nothing new. Every Republican administration going back at least to the Reagan years has been anti-porn. It really intensified and caused irreparable harm during the 8 years Bush Jr. was in office. There's a few misguided voters like Elkcreek who makes silly statements that he's going to vote Republican because he thinks he'll be able to afford to buy GIMP material, but little does he realize that the GOP is the most anti-freedom party out there that would set up restrictions on what we're allowed to view in our homes. Don't think I'm joking or exaggerating. I'm serious.

If for no other reason, every GIMPer should vote Democratic if they want to keep their freedoms intact. It's really that important.

It's not just the GOP: two high-profile Democrats have been on the censorship bandwagon. Tipper Gore (wife of the former VP) was involved with attempts to censor music and TV in the '90s, and Sen. Joe Lieberman (Al Gore's VP nominee in 2000) was involved with an effort to censor network TV in the early 2000s (tried to get "voluntary" restrictions on content, restore the "family hour", etc.). A true conservative would take the view that what one watches at home or on a computer, laptop, mobile device, is none of the government's business-let alone what goes on in the bedroom between consenting adults. The GOP has to appeal to its base-so keep that in mind. The Dems, in their platform, will stay silent-in all likelihood.

Glad the Republicans are trying to get government off our backs and out of our homes. I think they want government out of our lives unless its them in charge, then it's a good thing. I've always been amazed at the hypocrisy they expound.

I highly doubt that anti-porn legislation will EVER pass. One thing polititians (no matter what their party affiliation) have in common with us, the taxpayers and common folk, but will never admit to is the simple fact that they are as as likely to be turned on by and/or addicted to porn as any one of us.

That said, I also think the conservative and fundamentalist Christian crazies--who I personally feel predominate in the Republican Party, although they certainly aren't all residing there--are more likely to pass anti-porn legislation. And while I would like to agree with you, TGG, in your rational analysis of the reality of human needs, it is instructive to remember that Prohibition was also passed into law. I suspect consumption of alcohol is more widespread than enjoying pornography. (However, I have to admit that is my personal opinion and I would not be surprised to find out otherwise.)

Not even Fifty Shades of Grey and its two insipid sequels is going to legitimize BDSM in general or GIMP in particular. Knowing the deep-seated need of Americans to gang up on any group in order to feel superior and self-justified, I suspect many casual and enthusiastic porn lovers would vocally condemn GIMPers. In fact, they would probably align themselves with Christian crazies thinking that the crazies would leave them alone in pursuit of juicier prey, forgetting that as soon as they devour the GIMPers, they will turn on the vanilla porn lovers.

Yes, I am a misanthrope. People suck.

* * * * *

Ralphus: Thanks for the link to the additional nude pics of Dreama Walker from Compliance. She looks very vulnerable, which really sells the pictures. I am not sure whether or not I will be seeing the movie since it doesn't pander to my perverse prurient GIMP needs, instead going for social commentary. I already know society sucks. (See previous paragraph.) But I might check out the video and fast-forward to the dirty bits.

* * * * *

I'm not a fan of Nazi atrocities necessarily, but I am really liking the Men's Sweat Magazine covers. They really bring back memories of trips to the drug store, stretching up on tip-toes to reach the forbidden magazines in the back of the top row when the old guy behind the counter wasn't looking. I was always disappointed that there weren't more pictures and illustrations on the inside. But those covers were so awesome.

* * * * *

Barry O 4 Life: Thanks for your well-thought-out and reasoned comment. I suspect being proven wrong is a repeating theme in your life.

"Every time I think this board can't show more political ignorance, I am again proved wrong".

Gosh. There's no telling what it is that will bring a lurker forward. I know where I stand regarding which party is worse than the other regarding the future of our access to porn. And I think that most contributors on this subject are simply saying that the Republican platform language pretty much speaks for itself. Please know that it's OK to oppose a woman's right to choose and still recognize the anti-porn plank of the platform to be crap. And please go beyond the cheap shots and have the courage to tell us if you disagree. BTW, the proper form of the word is "proven".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIgaTJTzLhs

Of course I believe 99% of Republicans are not this far nuts as this guy preaching but their political leaders I'm not so sure about.

Humans are sexual creatures that love erotic sex of all kinds. We all know if we want to see real live porn just visit a college campus or a Florida / California beach for the string bikini leaves almost nothing to erotic imaginations.

I really do believe you can not get rid of porn and this GOP anti porn talk is bunch of toothless saber rattling. Bill K.

Re Sepp Dietrich: Sorry, J, but Dietrich was definitely SS.

Enough of all this politics! Not that these issues are unimportant. But the really crucial matter that has arisen recently has been pushed aside.

Which is.....!!!!!!!!

What cruel and brutal tortures do we wish to see inflicted on Amy's delicious body. And what tortures is she prepared to embrace, for her fans and her art!

After viewing the 3 min. video of Amber's full body whipping I believe you could have put a tattered top and torn dress on her and had a "live" Mag. cover!

Lets go thru ALL the evil leaders of history if we can just get art like this to show the things they did to the women of the times! Keep putting these up Boss!

But Fidel knows what time it is...it's GIMP time!

----------

More evil tyrants from history? How about Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Argentine dictator Jorge Rafael Videla and Roman emperor Galerius, for starters? Galerius, in particular, had pyro inclinations.

----------

Speaking of history...

Reine Margot: Your Highness, I neglected to respond to one of the topics of your record-breaking post. You had mentioned that in Dead but Dreaming, Amy's character is related to Bernardo O'Higgins, leader of the independence forces in Chile. By co-incidence I was, at the time, trying to find information about this leader, whom I learned about in high school history. The problem: I could not remember his name, or the country in which he operated - only that he was a red-haired Irishman. Bolivia, Peru, Venezuela, Colombia - I looked up every country but the correct one.

Thanks to your post, I have the information I sought. And now, Amy's hair color in the movie makes sense to me.

I have often tried to explain to my yanqui peers that the US was not the only immigrant destination in this hemisphere, and that South America's population is also very culturally and ethnically diverse. Your movie will undoubtedly do a much better job of persuasion than I could.

----------

There is a distinct line - a thin one, I'll admit - between policies (laws, regulations and the enforcement of such) and politics (elections, conventions and backroom dealing). IMHO, policies related to freedom of speech, censorship and restraints on the "means of production and distribution" of GIMP materials are legitimate topics for this forum.

I think we can have a civil discussion about these issues as long as we don't devolve into trashing one party or another, endorsing one candidate or another, castigating other posters, or pushing a broader agenda.

I say this fully realizing that my position could be "proved" wrong.

Well, there's the good ol' wheel, as shown in this Quoom classic...

When I approached Amy about the possibility of commissioning a scene, this was my second choice. I actually figured they would be much more likely to go with this one, rather than my first choice - the public flogging in Dead But Dreaming that we're all looking forward to. Amy said that both she and Jac were intrigued by the idea of a wheel torture, and in fact Jac had wanted one of the devices for a long time. Maybe with all the money they are floating in these days, they'll eventually have someone build a wheel for them. It wouldn't even have to have those pointed knobby things on it to torture the backside....just watching a naked gal go 'round and 'round on it a few times would be pleasure enough for me.

And someone mentioned having Amy hanging upside down. That was my third choice.

I'm really enjoying this Nazi gimp peril love feast week Ralphus, please keep posting them. Also it does seem to me there were more Nazi gimp fiery peril in men's magazine cover pictures then any other kind of Nazi peril combined which makes me a very happy :) camper. Fire good, Bill K.

Stay well all

That was a joke...

Some time ago I said I had a treat for everyone in the form of "re-done" illustrations from the "Men's-Magazine" era...showing the girls the way we wished they were...but I have not sent them to Ralphus via snail-mail yet...(which is the only fuckin' way I can because I'm too stupid and paranoid to use the internet, okay?)

Forgive my sloth as I WILL be sending MY versions of the magazine covers that inspired and promoted the development of my imaginative skills concerning ways to torture and rape gorgeous girls and translate that to drawings as my substantial skills as an artist developed. Hell, they HAD TO...how else was I going to get the visual stimulation I and a couple of my trusted friends need to "get-off" on?

Jeazzzzus! You people under the age of 50 can't possibly imagine the magnitude to which anything and everything even remotely "sexual" was repressed if not ILLEGAL and I mean EVERYTHING!...especially in rural "Small-Town-Christian-America" where we all praised Jesus and knew for certain the world was fuckin' FLAT!

To begin with, the ONLY place those magazines were available was at the very top of the magazine rack in the back of the local Drug Store...(the only one in town)...within view of the Pharmacist-Guardian of "The Good Stuff" that "youths" were forbidden to even see! (Hell, for that matter, the guys who bought that disgusting...sin-provoking filth were looked at like they were the filthy perverts every horny guy wished he had the guts to be!)

Getting my hands on these magazines when I was 8 and 9 years old required the help of my older friend Glenn, who was tall enough to reach...(and therefore steal)...them, was accomplished creating a "distraction", that being in the form of my absolutely drop-dead-gorgeous sister Sassy...(officially: "Sassy-Assed-Little-Bitch")...who had a pair of "C" cup tits...a tiny waist...million-dollar ass and great legs when she was only TEN, but then she started having a"period" when she was nine, so go figure.

Anyway, all it took was for Sassy to prance into the drug store wearing a little cotton dress...(the buttons of which she could UN-button as far as she could get away with)...and drive the Pharmacist Geezer out of his mind by doing nothing but letting him ALMOST see what he desperately wanted to see...while Glenn swiped one of each magazine and left before the Pharmacist-Geezer even knew he was there!

By the time I was ten, I was tall enough to pull that off and with Sassy being eleven...(now so proud of her "D" cup breasts and the stupidity of our Christian father who forbid her to wear a bra because..."ELEVEN YEAR OLD GIRLS DO NOT NEED BRAS!...which was the height of "denial" but sure as hell gave her an advantage...so we pulled the same thing off because the Pharmacist-Geezer never knew we were even together, let alone Brother & Sister.

Yes, you may correctly assume that Sassy liked the way I transformed those illustrations and Gil Elvgren's wonderful Pin-Up calendar art into something so "pornographic" it would raise a hard-on on a dead man.

So I promise...cross my heart and hope to die...I WILL get some of MY renditions of that work to Ralphus by next week! It will be up to him to let you see just what a sadistic bastard I was...okay...yeah-yeah-yeah...and still am but in REALITY...THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL I WOULD EVER RUIN A PAIR OF BEAUTIFUL BIG BREASTS...that would be stupid and wasteful and believe me...sometimes the real thing ain't nearly as "Sexy-Hot" as the fantasy so stick with the fantasy!

To Lady Margot: Ralphus has my phone number...please contact him so we may "converse".

To Ralphus: Thank you for all the hours and eye strain you endure to make this avenue of communication between human beings with brains possible!

Nice wheel, let me contribute with some pics of my own!

Another variation of the wheel, but pretty useful too!

Jennifer Lawrence, bondage, chloroform, boobs in white top, etc., might be good. Personally not into horror films, but Jen Lawrence bondage, might like that. :)