Previous - August 2011

Next - October 2011


September 2011

Name: Badger

Ralphus: Wow. Congratulations on your stirring of the beast. I am certainly willing to plead guilty to not complimenting John Galt and others who take the time and effort to post the excellent reviews. At the same time, when I read many of comments on other websites, it only increases my appreciation of The GIMP. Let's face it, some of those places seem to attract semi-literate and often scary commenters. I fully understand how frustrating it must be to see the number of hits relative to the number of contributors, but it is hard for me to get too upset when I consider how unique our forum really is with respect to the respect that we have for the artists and the level of intelligence and thoughtfulness that is expressed by contributors.

That said, welcome Nia. If there are more former lurkers out there like Nia, please step forward. Like Ralphus and Canadian, I love to hear the perspectives of our female contributors.

Jane: Your posts continue to be a joy to read --- and a real turn on. Your mix of comments, updates, and self-aware personal observations (oh, and did I mention your beauty?) are perfect examples of what makes this a special place.

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 12:15:30 AM

Name: MrAnthony
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Note that the criminal prosecution is occuring in Canada and not the U.S. Just about anyone from Canada who has ever tried to order a risque video from the U.S. knows how tough Canadian Customs is about pornography in general. They confiscate videos all the time. This wouldn't be anything new for them. See the link above, for example. Most of us know better than to take pornography outside the U.S. Imagine bringing a ZFX video to Saudi Arabia, for example...(hmm, sounds like a plotline for ZFX, using female video smugglers).

BTW, manga are Japanese comics; anime is animation. They could depict the same thing (e.g. the comic book version of the anime video would be Manga).

In the U.S. an actual person would have to be depicted; a cartoon or comic depicting young-looking sexual characters wouldn't be enough for a child pornography case per se, although I do know of prosecutions involving computer generated imagery that was photorealistic. However, the issue of obscenity is a different matter. It's entirely possible that some manga could not pass the three-prong Miller test and thus would be deemed obscene. A lot would depend on the locale; most likely local standards in California would let anime/manga be fine. However, other locales might find tentacle rape of apparent underage cartoon characters to be obscene, for example.

Mr. Anthony

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 12:29:21 AM

Name: Falstaff

Mwb: Your connection with the old Insex people must have given you many tales to tell. Given your connection, can you tell me if 912 is still active on any site and is she still with PD - given her involvement with the site, it seemed she was definitely more than just one of the models. Any information would be appreciated.

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 03:44:34 AM

Name: Mwb

Falstaff, I'm afraid 912 isn't doing anything as far as I know. She and PD were an item at one time. No idea why they split up.

Here is a tidbit. She called PD and asked how much it would cost HER to model for him!!! The rest, as they say, is history:)

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 04:57:05 AM

Name: Insomniac

OK I want to give my two cents on the Ralphus rant. You said Brian's page gets more posts, but what needs to be taken into account there is that those guys jump all over any little thing with bondage. I don't know about everyone else here, but for me most of what they post over there isn't worthy of discussion.

So I guess what you have to ask yourself is, do you want quantity or quality on this board? If this site started getting flooded with posts about stuff that hardly even qualified as GIMP material, I'd be on here a lot less because it'd be too much to muddle through.

If you want quality then you'll have to accept that there will be fewer posts. This topic is just too taboo for us to have enough source material for 20 good posts a day. And I'd rather not keep having the same discussions over the same material. I use this site to learn about the latest stuff out, not double back on stuff that's years and years old and that most of us should have heard about by now.

And Ralphus, if the site is getting 1200 hits a day, that should tell you that you're not wasting your time. In my opinion, the future of this site shouldn't even come into question as long as the traffic is up. If/when the traffic starts to dip, that's when you should really be concerned. Until then, the posts will come, we just need some good stuff to talk about!

Anyway, I'm not trying to rile things up here so I hope I don't get too many angry responses. It's just my take...

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 05:44:52 AM

Name: Insomniac
Homepage URL:

I'm not sure if this has been discussed, but if it hasn't, another mainstream film to look out for is Hostel: Part III, which is due to be released straight to DVD sometime before the end of the year, probably around Halloween. It has been rated R for strong bloody sadistic violence and torture, sexuality/nudity and pervasive language.

Considering how great Hostel: Part II was, this one certainly has potential. However there's already one red flag. "The story concerns a Vegas bachelor party that turns grisly, Hostel-style" according to one review site. Bachelor party...all guys...please no. But we'll see I guess.

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 06:00:48 AM

Name: Sloth

Insomniac - there may be another red flag on "Hostel III" - direct to video - of course that's a double edged sword so you're right, we will wait and see - thanks for the heads up.

Ralphus - and now that you have been tasked by Nia and realize your mission is to continue doing God's work we can all chime in with an "Amen".

Covers - just wanted to mention how much I have enjoyed the witch themed paperbacks you have featured the last few days.

Nia - I'll just say ditto to what A Canadian, YikYakker and the others have said - I think you'll find this is a rather accommodating bunch of sick twisted perverts.

YikYakker - speaking of our friend Brutus - have you heard from him - he seems to have taken an extended hiatus and I miss his input.

Jane - even as a retired gentleman of leisure I find ways to enrich my existence - for example, this coming week I'll be lining up sponsorship for this years annual Slim Whitman Look-a-Like Contest, a big event in these parts.......I know, I know, you're dying to be me - still, there is a void I can't seem to fill and can't quite put my finger on it - oh, I know what it is - I'm turning blue out here waiting for the release of "Maleficarum" so I can can view your girl-next-door good looks to be bound, tormented, tortured and burned at the stake - after the string of bad movies of late I'm chomping at the bit - any update on a release date?

Stay well all

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 09:31:42 AM

Name: mr bush


you can not quit, even though I mostly lurk, this is the first page I go to everyday to check what's going on. This is the most informative place for my passions in the world.

I like bondage and women with old fashion hair on their pussy, so what. Not many places you can go and talk about these issues. Thanks for your hard work!

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 02:54:39 PM

Name: DHT
Homepage URL:

I'm sure you guys know about this, but if not, I saw an ad for it in Fangoria. Looks like Christina Lindberg talks on the Director's commentary.

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 06:26:52 PM

Name: DHT

MWB: Yes, by all means, tell us more of your experiences! How did you meet PD?

After watching the Graphic Sexual Horror documentary I kinda hate him, but I'd still love to hear the stories.

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 06:31:27 PM

Name: Stormrider

I too have been guilty of lurking in the shadows of the GIMP (for a couple of months).

First off, I love this site. It's a great resource to me. I actually found out about you guys through another site (forgot which, Pulp Toons maybe) when I saw one of my very own pics as a picture of the day (archived at the time).

I mostly upload to Renderotica or the Dark Spot (as I have these), although I haven't done either in a while. For those that are interested, I use Poser PRO, VUE Xtreme and Photoshop for all my works. I do drop by your site every now and again in my quest for source material and ideas for pics.

To Jane and Margot: I have been eagerly anticipating Maleficarum, ...and by that I mean I CAN'T WAIT. Incredibly sexy women (check), actual uncut naked torture scenes (check), and a NAKED BATS SCENE!!!! (this alone is worth the price of admission). You gals (and guys) should be proud. I'll definitely be getting this one.

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 07:17:05 PM

Name: YikYakker

Ralphus: OK, now this made me LMFAO. It's just like the mental picture I had while reading your rant. Hee-hee.


Today's Pic: I've always wanted to sling a naked woman over my shoulder and carry her off like that. 'Course, it takes a strong back and solid muscles, like Conan has. But a guy can dream.


Here's an electro + suspension scene, for fans of such perversions, from a movie named Chameleon.

Or how about a branding + crucifixion + stretching combo from Day of Wrath?

They say variety is the spice of life.


Sloth wrote: ...speaking of our friend Brutus - have you heard from him - he seems to have taken an extended hiatus and I miss his input.

I checked the archives and saw that he posted frequently in early July, but then disappeared from the board. The August archive is not up yet, so I was not able to check for more recent Brutus postings. But you raise a good question...anyone know the answer?

One of our regulars mentioned going away for an extended period of time, so I thought it might be Brutus. But that could have been a year ago or a month ago; at my age, short term memory and long-term memory are nearly indistinguishable.


A Canadian and Dangerous Dave: While working on my post last night, I failed to refresh my browser and missed your exchange about Region 2 DVDs. I don't have a laptop, just a pretty old computer. But I did replace the CD/DVD drive. Maybe I should check to see what kinds of formats it can play. Never thought about it, so thanks for the tip.

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 07:48:35 PM

Name: John Galt

DHT: Thanks for the link to the Christina Lindberg movie, Wide Open. The interview with Christina sounds interesting, but the extra that caught my eye was: Reversible Nude Cover Artwork. Now how cool is that?

* * * * *

The last time I received one of my extremely infrequent e-mails from Delila Darling, she mentioned that she had done some more shoots for Hardcore Abductions. I was excited that she had done some more bondage shoots, but not as excited that it was with Hardcore Abductions, since I was disappointed in the last DVD they did featuring Delila, and said so in my less-than-flattering review (although I raved about Delila). But Delila is one of my Must-See Babes, so I bit the bullet and ordered what I thought sounded like the two best DVDs. Following is my review of the better of the two.

* * * * *

Roughies Vol #1 (Hardcore Abductions #114, 2011)

According to the Hardcore Abductions website, this DVD "is the start of a new series with slightly rougher treatment." There are two episodes on the disc, the first one featuring blond Alicia and the second one featuring redheaded Delila Darling. The disc runs for 47-1/2 minutes (divided roughly in half between the two episodes).

When the first episode begins, Alicia is already naked save for white thigh-high stockings and black high heels. She is bound with her hands behind her back and cleave gagged. Our masked assailant pushes her face down on the bed and she is hogtied. She struggles.
Alicia makes her entrance

3:00 minutes. Her feet are untied, she is rolled onto her back, her knees are spread and pushed back so that her feet are up in the air, and she is fucked. Alicia whimpers, grimaces and looks like she is hurt and humiliated.  She is also slapped in the face.

Alicia is fuckedAlicia forced fellatio
5:00 minutes. The gag is removed. Her hair is used to reposition her so she can suck his cock as he reclines on the bed.

7:30 minutes. He lays her back on the bed, hikes up her knees again and fucks her again. As you can see in the vidcaps below, Alicia is very expressive and really makes it look like he has painfully forced himself inside her... but then he spoils it by asking her if he's inside her and she nods yes. Aside from that gaffe, though, Alicia is actually quite good and convincing that she is being raped. (Notice how the camera wanders too high in that last shot? More on that later.)
Alicia being expressive 1Alicia being expressive 2Alicia being expressive 3

9:00 minutes. Back to sucking his cock.

11:30 minutes. Cleave gag goes back in. He pulls her to the edge of the bed, grabs her under the knees and fucks her again.

13:00 minutes. Pulls her up, removes her gag, and has her suck him off until he comes in her mouth (or so he says). She swallows, he slaps her and binds her back into a very loose hogtie. She struggles.

15:30 minutes. Ball gag goes into her mouth.

16:00 minutes. He applies a vibrator to her pussy while he also fondles, pinches, sucks, bites and slaps her breasts and nipples.

17:30 minutes. Unties her ankles, spreads her legs and vibes her to three orgasms over the next 3-1/2 minutes.

20:50 minutes. More cock sucking.

22:00 minutes. Alicia tries to flee but basically just flops onto the bed. She is gagged and hogtied again. When he tries to pass the rope around her throat she tells him not to, so he doesn't. The camera does a brief tour of the ceiling. The scene ends with him putting a bag over her head, which she doesn't like. Fade out.
Alicia hogtied

The second episode begins at the 24 minute mark with Delila Darling walking into her hotel room, where her assailant is waiting. She is wearing a shirt, knee-length black skirt, patterned pantyhose and black high heels. While she is turned to lock the door, he comes up behind her and we have a very weak struggle session until he throws her face down onto the bed and ties her wrists behind her back.
Delila is attacked

26:00 minutes. Ballgag goes into Delila's lovely mouth, and he pulls her hair to force her head up. Manhandles her on the bed, hogties her, and opens her shirt to expose and fondle her breasts. Delila struggles on the bed.
Delila is exposedDelila is fingered

28:30 minutes. He rolls Delila onto her back, fingers her pussy, rips her pantyhose open at the crotch, and finger fucks her. There is more rough handling and spanking.

30:00 minutes. He pulls her head to the edge of the bed and forces her to suck his cock, with some hair pulling to add to the mix.
Delila forced fellatio

32:00 minutes. A wad of cloth is stuffed into Delila's mouth to gag her and she makes choking sounds, which is a nice touch.

34:00 minutes. Delila is positioned on her back and as he (very briefly) fucks her she makes a decent face of pain and helplessness.
Delila is fuckedDelila is fucked

34:30 minutes. The gag comes out so she can suck his cock again. A nice touch here is that the ribbon-looking thing that was holding the wad of cloth in Delila's mouth is still in place around her throat, and he drags her around using it, eliciting some realistic gagging, coughing and choking sounds from Delila.
Delila sucks cockDelila sucks cock

37:00 minutes. Gag back in as Delila is positioned on the bed on her back, knees pushed back, feet in the air, while he fucks her some more.
Delila fucked againDelila fucked again

39:30 minutes. The guy lays on his back on the bed and has Delila lean over and suck his cock.

42:00 minutes. Delila is slapped in the face a couple times until she asks him to fuck her, which he does.

44:15 minutes. "Feel me coming?" (I know it was meant as a taunt, but it came across as a request for information. Not as bad as "Am I in?" but close.)

44:30 minutes. Delila is ball gagged, hogtied, and left bound helpless on her bed. Fade out.
Delila ballgagged and abandoned

SUMMARY: Blond Alicia is bound, gagged, manhandled, slapped, fucked and made to suck cock until her assailant comes in her mouth. Redheaded Delila Darling is manhandled, bound, slapped, gagged, forced to suck cock and fucked until her assailant comes inside her. Alicia is almost naked the whole time. Delila wears her clothes the entire time, but her shirt is opened to reveal her breasts and her skirt is pushed up to reveal her pussy.

Aside from the attractive models, this DVD is spectacularly disappointing. I could have simplified my review by saying: gag model, fuck pussy, ungag model, suck cock, then repeat, repeat, and finally repeat. Both Alicia and Delila made some great rape victim faces and noises, but sadly they could not overcome the lack of any coherent script, or the absence of any sense of threat or peril from their assailant. This may be rougher than the standard Hardcore Abduction fare, but the bar wasn’t very high to begin with. If I were expecting a rough assault-and-rape video, this would not fulfill my expectations. What makes it worse is that both Alicia and Delila are hot and sexy and would look incredible being roughly raped and abused...both of them demonstrated the talent to look and sound like rape victims.

From a technical aspect, the videographer could have used a lot more skill. The camera went wild several times, and all too often the action was not properly framed. Many shots were too close, so you could see faces and expressions or genitals and action (what of it there was), but never both. Sometimes you got a nice view of the sheets or the headboard with a random body part in one of the corners. I will give credit for not showing a lot of the guy, which I absolutely did not want to see, but frequently I didn't get great views of the girls, either. The lighting was excellent, though.

Bottom line: If you like the looks of Alicia, she is naked and "raped" in her episode, so that is worthwhile. If you like Delila, she is exposed (but not naked) and "raped" in her episode, so that is kind of worthwhile. If you are looking for a believable rape scenario, where the rapist has some idea about what kinds of nasty things he wants to do to his helpless victims and uses harsh force to make them comply, it is a bust. Need I mention that although neither girl is completely naked (although Alicia is close enough), our rapist is? What is up with that? And does Delila Darling not want to get naked for Hardcore Abductions, or does the site not want to show her naked? I'm beginning to think it is a conspiracy. There was nudity, forced fellatio and nonconsensual fucking, so I will grant this a C grade. It could have been so much more.

This DVD is available for $40 from Hardcore Abductions. I could not get two of my workstations to recognize the DVD (!), but it played just fine on a third workstation and in my DVD player.

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 08:00:37 PM

Name: covers
Homepage URL:

Carnyx: That does not sound like a mainstream American comic book from the '70's.
Do you remember the format or size?
What language was it written in?
Where did you buy/find the publication?
Was the story in Black and White or color?
Do remember any of the characters' names?
Did you actually see the nipples on the topless women?
Was the text in word balloons or in paragraphs under the pictures?

Carnyx wrote: hi everyone- here is the first one. it might be the best comic book whipping i have ever seen. i found it in late 1975. i think it was to cash in on the charlies angels craze. there was this elite group of scantily clad women crime fighters. one of them went undercover in some criminal organization. she was revealed to be a spy by this crooked black detective who was working for the group. they then cut to a scene where the spy is being whipped topless by a crazy topless woman who is getting her pleasure from this. she has an ugly birthmark on her face and she keeps telling the girl to beg for mercy which she refuses to do. she is finally rescued by a crime fighter with a russian accent. the crazy woman tells her she'll make her beg for meercy too, but the russian tells her she is a very sick woman. please let me see this scene again before i die! thank you everyone. robert

Thursday, September 1st 2011 - 11:02:18 PM

Name: midgeteskimo
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

So I too am a lurker, and have been for a couple of weeks. I keep thinking I should post but like Nia I don't always feel like I have something to contribute. So I racked my mind and thought of a website I have occasionally visited that some of you, especially those who like whipping, might find interesting. Some of you probably already are aware of it, but I figure any post is better than no post. The website is Lots of really intense whipping scenes with blood and crying. Hope that someone who reads this finds a site that they hadn't seen before, and really likes.

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 12:02:31 AM

Name: Distressed Damsel

*she delurks briefly*

I've lurked on these pages for quite some time now. A few months ago, I emailed Ralphus in regards to the subject of bondage in Second Life, along with a few pictures of my exploits there.

Since bondage IRL is completely inconvenient with teenagers around the house and work to go to, I've indulged my fantasies more that I ever could in real life, even to the point being collared by my online master in a very beautiful ceremony. Since discovering this interactivity, my interest in movies has diminished significantly.

As a little girl, I remember making my mother buy many boxes of cereal so I could get the pink Penelope Pitstop car.... I so wanted to be her, though at the time I didn't know why. How many of us were fascinated by that wicked cartoon, hmmm?

In Second Life, when the "Hooded Claw" captures me, he can do so much more than tie me up and put me into a wicked death trap (though he can do that too!). Sooooo.... perhaps I'm just delurking and trying to start a conversation on this perhaps, and just wanting this site to continue as well. One of the reasons I've never really posted before is, the site is mostly male, and the women that do post seem to be involved in the business side of things.

Ok, enough rambling for me (.. and she quickly runs and hides again).

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 05:10:29 AM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: Nice job on the review of Roughies Vol #1. I think your review confirms the importance of the written word, because if I were to judge the movie solely from the caps, I would think it looks pretty good (except for the rapist who decides to bare all). You really need the written details to confirm how it all plays out, particularly the fact there's no sense of threat or peril. Too bad, because Alicia looks quite hot.


Mr. Anthony wrote:

Just about anyone from Canada who has ever tried to order a risque video from the U.S. knows how tough Canadian Customs is about pornography in general. They confiscate videos all the time.

Ain't that the truth.

Last year, I sent some GIMP stuff to our friend, Ralphus. I don't think I'm betraying any confidences when I tell you Ralphus was amazed at how nervous I am sending stuff across the border. I guess it's not an issue when you have material going from Canada to the U.S., but Canadians develop a general nervousness about the border.

The good news for those of us in Canada is that it is easier these days to bypass Canada Customs. More GIMP material is being sold within the country and, of course, there's plenty of material available online. Still, it can be frustrating at times.

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 09:27:14 AM

Name: Sloth
Homepage URL:

Time for a quick chime in before I hit the road.

John Galt - ditto A Canadian's comments - based on the caps you provided that one is a buy - thanks for the info.

At the above link a humble contribution to our Whippings Scenes database - not bad at all for a tv production.

Stay well all

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 09:42:34 AM

Name: Thawkinsworth
E-mail address:

Today's pic hits the spot.

They've already got her pleading, and haven't even started with the heavy stuff!

Love it!

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 12:23:07 PM

Name: Mwb


I'll spread this out a little:)

After I moved into this place, I found myself looking for ways to get rid of "stuff".

I had boxes of old mags and paperbacks. Made mention of it on insex and PD and I got together and he said he would take them. Cool.

Well, in the drive comes this big black van. Out hops PD and 912 and ScotT.

I found him ok. He wasn't nasty or mean. Every day guy. 912 was nervous and got the giggles. She is cuter than her pictures!!!

That is how I met PD the first time.


Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 12:50:23 PM

Name: Badger

Psst: Hey guys. While Distressed Damsel is out of the room, we need to come up with some devious trick to get her to de-lurk again.

midgeteskimo: Welcome! I bet that YOU can see Russia from YOUR porch. Or at least you could if you were taller. Perhaps we can set you up with Ralphus.

All Right. So the three of you want us to keep telling you how much we enjoy hearing from women. OK. We'll do what it takes. But watch out with the teasing. You can imagine what we do to teases. Just imagine.

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 01:39:59 PM

Name: Bill K.

This new P.T. post: tells a story of painful death on the rack, which I find the beautiful sexy nude helpless women spread eagle enjoyable. I would think that if a lady victim had their choice of painful torture deaths they would choose the rack over much more painful torture ways to die. Just saying it looks like the most comfortable body position to take agonizing slow painful death compare to other position methods. Am I right or wrong or just nuts? Ralphus/guys check out Bmovie's new "Hot Seat" bats art. Jane/Margot please what is the status on Maleficarum? Bill K.

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 05:49:11 PM

Name: Bill K.

Here is that Yahoo group Bmovie villians cliff hangers hot seat pic:, that I said Ralphus had to check out in my last post.

Bill K.

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 06:56:38 PM

Name: YikYakker

John Galt: Too bad about Roughies Vol #1. For $40 one can pick up a Red Feline flick instead. But I feel your disappointment. Thanks for the warning.


Distressed Damsel: Glad you could visit. Maybe you can return and tell those of us who are uninitiated (and here I'm probably speaking for myself) just what "Second Life" is, and some of the ways one can use it for entertainment related to GIMP leanings?


So last night the guys came over to watch the football game and do some beers. My lovely young neighbor across the street is a big football fan, so she dropped in to watch the game, wearing her team jersey. Well, it was the last pre-season game and none of her favorite star players were on the field, so she became very bitchy and vociferous.

After putting up with this far too long, we stripped off her jersey, gagged her, tied her to one of those barstool-type chairs, and put her in the corner with her back to the TV so she couldn't watch the game. Whenever we would finish a beer, we'd toss the empty can at that sweet spot between the shoulder blades of her bare back, trying to bank the shots into the recycling bin. That was even more fun than watching the game. She didn't like it at all, but her only reaction was "Mmm-mmph!" Hee-hee!


To all of my American buds out there: hope you have a fun and safe holiday weekend!

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 08:12:39 PM

Name: John Galt

Christina Lindberg Appreciation Week Addendum: This article at Mr Skin caught my attention because it featured Christina Lindberg choking Synapse Films' Jerry Chandler. It features a brief but interesting interview in which Jerry Chandler discusses the negative impact file sharing has on Synapse Films.

Synapse Films released the new DVD of Wide Open that DHT mentioned a few days ago. They were also the ones who released the two versions of Thriller: A Cruel Picture that I discussed in my review, and now that I have visited the Synapse Films web site, I can tell you the Limited Edition is the one you want. The Vengeance Edition has all the violence but none of the naughty bits, apparently, to make it easier to market in mainstream stores.

They are also the folks who released the new DVD of Exposed, which I originally saw at the drive-in (*sigh*) under the title Diary of a Rape and reviewed under that title but I notice Ralphus cross-referenced it under both titles in the REVIEWS section.

And they released Sex and Fury on DVD, which I just reviewed as well.

They also released the Christina Lindberg movies Maid in Sweden, a non-violent, non-GIMP sexploitation movie, as well as Anita, a sexploitation flick that sounds like it might have some rough sex or violent fantasy content but I have never seen it, so if someone out there has and you can clue me in, I would appreciate it. That's SIX Christina Lindberg flicks. I'm thinking of writing to this Jerry Chandler guy and asking him to look for Journey to Japan, the hard-to-find movie Ralphus just reviewed. Something tells me if anyone can do it, he might be the man.

By the way, this is also the company that partnered with Mr Skin to release the Triple-Feature Women in Prison DVD that I mentioned last month (or whenever).

And here I thought Anchor Bay was the only company out there seeking out great exploitation and cult movies and releasing them on DVD. I highly recommend checking out the Synapse Films web site. I saw a lot of cult favorites there.

* * * * *

A special welcome to Distressed Damsel and Nia because it is always nice to get points of view and comments from the fairer sex. It makes the forum seem less like a sausage fest all the time. Plus, guys fall all over themselves welcoming you and it makes for more posts, which keeps Ralphus from throwing hissy fits. So thanks for that, too.

Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 11:01:54 PM

Name: Margot
Homepage URL:

The anticipated post about anticipation from Reine Margot

The time has come to set the date for the long anticipated release of Maleficarum, which is, perhaps, the most anticipated movie we ever made, which, in fact, this anticipation is scary. Why? Because even Hollywood, with their multibillion dollar budgets sometimes disappoints its people. Just think of the anticipation for Superman Returns....a very expensive movie that came out just terrible, not even such a great actor as Kevin Spacey could save it. So, it is scary to release a movie that is so, but so anticipated by our fans and a lot of other people that just happened to hear about this movie and now can't wait to see it.

For instance, one of our actors and associate producer was with some friends and mentioned, in passing, that he worked in the movie. His friends visited our pages and were amazed at the sight of the pictures and now they are waiting with anticipation to see the movie. That's scary.

But why could there be disappointment? As we all know it has to do with expectations. We all dream of that one wish we have, be that a boy, or a girl, or a movie, or a piece of cake. I once was very, intensely disappointed with a bag of coffee that promised to be the coffee I was always dreaming about and it wasn't. Just recently, Jane and JJ were having dinner and decided to watch a French movie, La Prisonniére, directed by H.G. Clouzot. It started well enough, they were loving it immensely and felt that, yes, this was going to be one of those memorable films that would haunt them forever.... half way into the movie it turned into a bad, terrible movie. A promise unfulfilled.

So, there's anticipation for Maleficarum and a lot of it has to do with expectations, with the fulfillment of a dream, a wish, a long thirst that needs to be quenched. And that's the scary part. How many Maleficarum dreams are out there now? In how many ways has this film been imagined already?

That's the drama of filmmakers like us, who up the ante and then have to live with it. That's our drama.

We have the experience of Martyr, of course, a film that was not announced on our regular circuit but one day one of our Red Feline fans found the site where we were talking about the film long before it was even shot, put two and two together and figure out that the people who were behind the making of Martyr or, as it was known then, The Death of St Eulalia, were the same people who were responsible for the Red Feline movies, and that the star of Martyr was none other than Camille herself, known then for her work in Red Feline on the Cross. That fact in itself raised the expectations for that film. And perhaps those expectations and the searching for them in the film made some people miss what the film was all about, made them miss the incredible performance by Camille who shows in Martyr that amazing talent she has. Jane turned into Red Feline after seeing that film and can't stop talking about it, big fan, and Mila is totally in awe of Camille's performance.

Martyr was not a Red Feline production, it was not made with only our niche audience in mind, but it had the same elements within a more dramatic, more personal story told for a wider audience. After years of waiting for its release, people are finally seeing it and some are very happy and some are not. The film was shown in some festivals and it is now in DVD and VOD distribution. So far it has recovered most of the investment and it's selling nicely.

But Maleficarum is not Martyr. It is not a film about a personal search and its consequences, like Martyr.

Maleficarum is about the inquisition, period. And it does have more graphic and realistic torture than any film of its kind made for general release. And yet, it's scary to know that there's such anticipation for the movie.

If people ran out the door during the screening of Martyr, I can't imagine what some people will do during the screening of Maleficarum. It is a very hard film to watch because it was a very hard film to make. A person who was in the set during the shooting, wrote a very interesting piece, in Spanish, where he talks about what was the mood in the set. I will have the English translation of the article soon.

It was really difficult for us to decide to have the theatrical release. It was because of the encouragement of our cast and crew that we decided to actually show it here, in a theatre, although for a very limited time. We believe it's going to shock everyone. This country has never seen a movie like this being produced here. Never. And I believe there are very few, really few movies in the mainstream market that have what we have in Maleficarum.

We didn't think it was a film to be shown at a movie theatre. And for a critic who has advance word of the movie, JJ will join the ranks of those wildly controversial directors such as Passolini.

So, we arrived to the moment when we have to set the date, to commit. We've arrived to the moment of truth.

Sometimes dates can be meaningful.

We released Martyr when Holy Week was beginning and one person wrote about it saying that Martyr was a Holy Week movie, like all those movies about Jesus and the bible. So, what would be a nice date to release Maleficarum? And why not just any date?

Although this is a direct to DVD and VOD release, we do have a theatrical opening in mind here, in the city where the film was shot. It's a tradition to have a nice opening where all the actors and crew are present, where we have lots of guests and we celebrate the movie with wine and o'deurs and followed by a wild party with a band and so on. And yes, we will have that. We have 32 actors in this movie and many of them want to invite family and friends... that will make a party of a couple of hundred people.

So, we needed to finally set a date.

Jane, JJ and some of us got together for a meeting of the minds. Everyone was waiting for JJ's word as when he would be done with the editing, mixing, etc. We were in the "northern summer" release track and summer up in the north was almost over. In fact, hurricane season was about to begin in the East Coast of the US, of all places, our friends and family in NY were getting ready to embrace the high winds.

When all eyes were on JJ with the big question he simply said. "Halloween".

We looked at each other thinking about the meaning of the word. And yes, it made sense.

What better season than Halloween to release a horror movie, because it is a horror movie, about women accused of being witches?

We thought of the amazing possibilities for the movie release party, where we could all be in costume... during the premiere at the movie theater and in the club, during the after-party. We have a good band. Our cinematographer is the drummer, a very good one too, JJ's son is the manager and singer and he's one of the actors in Maleficarum, the lead guitar is the lead gaffer .. and so on.

A Maleficarum party in Halloween!... Wicked.

And so, we all agreed that Halloween was the date. On October 31st at exactly 0:00 hrs, Eastern time, right after Cinderella ran away at the turn of the clock announcing the new day, Maleficarum will be made available for downloads, DVDs, and 20:00 hrs this most wonderfully wicked movie will have a theatrical opening here in the city where it was shot. It will be a limited engagement by our decision. It will play for two weeks only and in one show per night. I expect that by the end of that day, before November walks through the doors of time, ALL OF YOU will have downloaded Maleficarum or else the famous trick or treat will be enforced.

So now, you can all be looking forward to that date. The way time has been flying over our heads, it won't feel long, in fact, we all went into panic immediately after the date was set on stone. It takes organization and a lot of work, to set something like this and now we're bound, hand and feet, to that stone with the date carved into it, and we can't fail.

So now that we have a release date for Maleficarum, finally, but we also have a lot of other things in hand.

We have the release of a new little movie made by JJ and Mila a week before Jane's return from her trip to the US. This new movie is in the fashion of our Via Crucis of Camille series and it is titled, appropriately enough, The Via Crucis of Mila. We expect to have this movie out next week. I'll have more to day about it and more pictures.

We will also have the release of Barbazul before the end of the year. Wow, half of the year is almost over. We will know when we're going to release Jane's movie after the 3rd of this month, when we'll be discussing with Gabrielle her trip to these parts to star in yet another movie made by Jane.

We'll also be shooting the famous spy movie and a few more Via Crucis movies with both Jane and Mila.

Le Marquis de la Croix, however, will see the light of the screening room much later, maybe even early next year.

So, that's our story... for now.
A word about the GIMP site.

I follow this site on a regular basis, I read most of the posts with interest and I'm very happy when I see a response to my epic posts and very, very disappointed when I don't get a response. It makes me feel like crying, hiding under a rock in the bottom of the Titikaka Lake, the highest lake on earth, it's about 1000 meters higher than this city... which sits in a deep valley 3600 mts above the sea, that's very high.

But still, even when I don't get a response, when I feel utterly ignored, I feel that the site is great. I agree with Jane when she says that this site made a difference to us. It's great to have a place where we can exchange ideas, submit plans, receive accolades, share our pain, our joy and everything. We do feel like we're in a family here where we can be ourselves and won't be thrown to the dogs for that.

We appreciate the respectful way we're treated. But it's not only the respect but also the embracing warmth. Do you know the expression It Rocks? ... Well, this site rocks!

I'll have more extraordinary news at a later date, as well as a countdown to Maleficarum.


Friday, September 2nd 2011 - 11:37:24 PM

Name: Distressed Damsel
Homepage URL:

*Smiles and delurks again.* Yik Yakker asked what "Second Life" was, and so I apologize in that I assumed most knew what it was.

Second Life is a 3d virtual world, and you can find out much just by googling the wiki. Basically, you download the "viewer" which is sort of like a web browser, but it lets you log into the "grid", you then create an avatar to represent yourself. While SL if free, clothing, avatars and all the goodies to cost real money. Bondage in SL has a large community, some experience, many not (A large number of guys just looking to pleasure themselves to your Avi (avatar) which I avoid like the plague.) but with the right partner, it can be very immersive.

I hope this is correct on how to post a pic:

This is a pic of my master doing rather wicked thing to me. Interestingly enough, there are USB enabled sex toys that will allow a partner to control remotely, to further immerse yourself in the virtual world.

Now some engage in voice talking, but I prefer emoting and role playing, besides the fact, I don't think I want my kids in the next room hearing mommy doing sexy talk.

There are many SIMS (or simulations) to choose from. These are privately owned and most are free to use. There is one SIM that I go to called, "The Village." Here, men armed with blunted arrows chase women around and attempt to capture them for forced role play.

Here is an excerpt from a saved scene with my master Vincent, to give you an idea what a scene might be like:

Vincent: *He slides his hands over your thighs as he forces them back, to roughly part them and then lavishly kisses your sex. His lips pressing and then sliding over your nethers as he drives his tongue into you. Sucking and slurping on your leaking mound. Growling against your sensitive flesh. Making your whole mound vibrate as he begins to give you your reward as he promised*

Valendia: *she screams as his mouth finds her satin soft folds. He can feel the flaming heat of her flesh, her honey immediately oozing quite freely, her sex so over sensitive from the harsh stings of the crop. Her breath is immediately taken from her, she in shock at the unbelievable pleasure of his mouth pressing between her lewdly parted legs. Her cries of anguish quickly turn to cries of sweet, blissful pleasure* Vincent.... oh! Oh my master, your mouth feels so good on my pussy! Oh, thank you sir!

Vincent: *He looks up to you. Making his lips pop wetly on your mound. his tongue sliding over your slit up and down. Kissing and sucking on your clit from time to time. His hands holding your legs open and back. Letting your heeled feet kick in the air, he smiles and growls even more as he tastes your nectar so directly. He then snakes his tongue into you and balls it up. Plunging deeper and then slowly pulling back. Curling it to drag your honey to his mouth no verbal answer coming from him*

Valendia: *her tears of agony are replaces by tears of joy as his skill at pleasing a woman are so evident, his attentions sending her into a state of heavenly, sensual pleasure. Her sex erupting with honey and tingling warmly. She can not help but squirm and writhe, but this time... this time her writhing is from the skills of his mouth. Her cream flowing so freely, her nether lips quivering from his attentions, he can tell she is close. She calls to him weakly* Master! you slut is going to cum! Please sir, please say I can cum for you sir!

Vincent: *He grips your thighs tighter.. holding your hips pinned as you writhe on the bed. His tongue keeps slowly sliding over your folds. Trailing your pussy lips one side then the other. He smiles and doesn't pause... not answering you for long moments as he kisses and suckles. Dragging that tongue over your wet sex with a painful slow pace, finally answering with one simple word* No *He makes you hold back. Continuing to pleasure you. Making you wait.. making you have to struggle not to climax for him yet*


And so on, back and forth, the only limit the imagination of the players involved as they react to each other's emotes. Of course you could role play forced sex, torture, etc. I've been ravaged by demons, captured and tortured by Gorean warlords, etc.

I hope this has been helpful and informative.

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 03:18:43 AM

Name: John Galt

Margot: Wow, another epic post with awesome pictures. I especially liked the suspended spread-eagle on the horse one. In fact, there's never a disappointing image to be found in your posts. It is also difficult to imagine being disappointed in Maleficarum, but I suppose that is standard operating procedure for releasing a film--you work so hard on it and then put it out there and wait to see what people think. (Or, more sadly to the point these days, if people think.)

Well, I suspect it will be quite the masterpiece of GIMP, given its creators and stars and your track record to date. Halloween sounds like an inspired bit of planning for the release date. It's great that it will be released for immediate download, but is there a possibility for pre-ordering the DVD so that it will be shipped out on Halloween, or possibly in time for a Halloween arrival? Just wondering. On the one hand, I would like to see it as quickly as possible, but on the other hand, I just like having a physical DVD of favorite movies. Maybe you could do a special limited-time DVD-and-Download offer...?

It's too bad we can't attend a Grand Release Party, or even the World Premiere Showing, because that would be so cool. If you do something like that, maybe you could arrange webcam coverage and we who are so far away could participate vicariously, sitting off to the side watching everyone else having fun, which come to think of it is how I engage at most parties. But that's just me. Maybe the webcam audience could be treated to the cast and crew (but especially the cast) discussing the movie, the making of the movie, what's going on currently, stuff like that. Interacting with live comments via the Internet. Except that sounds like a lot of work. Especially if just three or four people comment. Isn't that right, Ralphus? ;)

I can honestly say I feel some genuine anticipation for Maleficarum. It's going to be a long two months.

* * * * *

Distressed Damsel: USB enabled sex toys? Really? I don't know whether to be fascinated or horrified, but I think maybe equal parts of both make for the most stimulating combination. I'll admit I first heard about Second Life on NPR's Talk of the Nation and Science Friday, and it is absolutely no surprise to me that talk of USB enabled sex toys never came up in any of those conversations. I'm still not sure I would prefer to act out intimate or wicked adventures in a virtual world, but I can safely assure you that I now know far, far more about Second Life than I did just an hour ago.

Thanks for the incredible post. It was educational, enlightening, and very possibly for some dedicated lurkers, enabling. Nice job on the image posting as well. You should definitely de-lurk on a regular basis.

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 03:36:36 AM

Name: Badger

Gosh. So many Thanks to extend. Where do I begin?

Maybe with Covers for the great art that Ralphus has been posting over the last week or so. What a finish??!!

And Distressed Damsel You sure are making up for lost time lurking. It seems like only yesterday that my daughter was watching some character in "The SIMS" catching fire at a backyard barbeque. These new technologies set the mind a racing.

And John Galt: Thanks for Mapquesting Synapse Films for us. Looks like a real winner.

And last but most emphatically: Margot Your posts and vidcaps are always so awesome that we sometimes neglect to tell you how much we appreciate them. When my wife asks me why I am crossing off the days until Halloween, I'll just have to tell her that it has replaced Thanksgiving as my favorite holiday.

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 08:06:41 AM

Name: carnyx
E-mail address:

hi covers- sorry it took a few days to get back to you. first of all thank you for the conan pics. to answer your questions about the comic i'm searching for: it was in black and white and in english. and yes you did see the womens nipples. it was probably an underground comic. my friend bought it at a flea market in philadelphia, but the dealer was only selling new comics. he also had other sexy comic books that would not be mainstream. thank you for your help. robert

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 11:39:01 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: A belated thanks for the review of Roughies Volume 1. Ironically, I got my copy the very day your review was posted so I could compare what you had to say with my own experience. My opinion is you were a little rough on the film, although my own grade overall wouldn't be much different. The opening sequence with Alicia was clearly the weaker of the two, especially starting off with her already naked and tied up. Then the ending where he actually tells her "I'm going to pleasure you" with the vibrator seemed wildly out of place for a forced sex scenario. Thank God he didn't do that with Delila.

I was much more happy with the Delila scene, which is good since she's the reason I got the movie in the first place. My criticisms of Delila & Nichole were solved this time around. No blindfold, no vibrator, no Delila smarting off. In fact, I was pleasantly surprised when Silverback repeated the "Who's my bitch?" line from the previous movie. In the first movie she smarted off and said "Not me, motherfucker!" This time around it was a forced and compliant "me" in between choked breaths while he made her suck his cock. Delila was much more of a victim here and Silverback played a rapist well, although I wish there were a little more meanness in his performance. Still, both stayed in character throughout. A big improvement.

My disappointment was that Silverback kept taking Delila's gag off to have her suck his cock, and each time he replaced it, it became less and less effective. She starts out gagged properly with a ballgag, then that's taken out for the blow job. Then it's the cleave with mouth packing; that's removed for more sucking. The third time around she just willingly holds the packing in her mouth, and by the time he finishes with her, she's not gagged at all. Since she looks so much better gagged, that was a letdown as the scene reached its climax, so to speak. It's obvious to me that Silverback never had an orgasm in either sequence, that he faked it both times. In a hardcore movie, you expect a money shot.

I'm not a big fan of oral sex, so to keep switching back and forth between sucking and intercourse, which I'm assuming Silverback needed to keep his erection, slowed up the pace when I would have preferred more continuous raping. Nonetheless, it's Delila Darling tied up and raped! I'll ignore the flaws and trim it down when I make my highlights compilation. There's definitely some good stuff in this DVD. Overall, I'd give it a C+.

The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 01:06:09 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

Been busy here lately. That's a good thing. Let me touch on a few more posts.

Insomniac: As for the prospects of a Hostel: Part III, setting the film at a bachelor party is obviously a bad sign. Also consider that Part 1, a sausage-fest, made lots of money. Part 2, with the tied-up babes, was a box office disappointment. If you were the producers of the second sequel, which direction would you go?

Well, I know what I would do, but I don't care about making money, I just want to see chicks tied up on film. Unless there's a GIMPer behind this, I have a feeling the money thing will take precedence. I'm keeping my expectations low.


Stormrider: Welcome to the forum. Wow, if your other artworks are as good as the medieval horse pic I featured a while back, I'll bet the forum would love to see more. That one was really outstanding. No surprise you're waiting like the rest of for Maleficarum because that's the kind of atmosphere I'm hoping for when that film gets released.


midgeteskimo: Likewise, good to see another new poster here, especially someone my own size.

We've got 4 reviews from Elite Pain in our Reviews section, but the company doesn't get discussed much here. What titles from them do you like? The big news with them was when their site got shut down after they were supposedly hurting one of their actresses after she told them to stop. Anybody know more about what happened with that case?


Distressed Damsel: Yet another female lurker comes out! Who would have thought you kinky chicks actually read this site? I'm sorry I don't immediately recall you e-mailing me, at least with that moniker. I hope I was polite to you :) The Penelope Pitstop cartoons introduced a lot of us to bondage when we were kids. Hay-elp! Hay-elp!

The Second Life stuff looks interesting. Those 3D bondage graphics are impressive. And good job figuring out how to link pictures here. Hope to see you posting more.


John Galt: If I recall, they interview Christina Lindberg on the Exposed DVD, too. I'm an ageist but I have to admit Christina still looks nice today, even though she's in her early sixties. I've seen Anita: Swedish Nymphet and Lindberg gets naked a LOT and looks great having sex and giving simulated oral. As far it being rough or violent, though, the best thing that happens to her is she gets punched by another woman and spends a good deal of the picture with a black eye and a bandage on her face. Personally, I think that's a very appealing look for her.

Margot: Hard to believe that your posts would ever get ignored around here; everyone I know loves it when you stop by with your detail-filled updates, always brimming with hot pictures. This time around was no exception. Halloween is the perfect date to release Maleficarum. I'm going to be just like a little kid looking forward to Halloween just like I used to, although this time for a different reason, obviously.

This was discussed on the Stakedamsels forum, would it be possible to release the DVD with an additional commentary track? I know I would love to hear Jane and JJ discussing the ins and outs of making this movie, and it might encourage others to buy the DVD instead of taking the illegal step of trying to download it somewhere from file sharers. Aside from a making-of documentary, that would be the ultimate DVD extra. Anybody else like that idea?

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 04:18:43 PM

Name: Bill K.

Margot thanks for great post and congratulation to Jane JJ and all the crew of Maleficarum for completion of the movie. May I ask will it be possible and could you pre sale and ship the DVD before Halloween so buyers would get it at around Halloween (opening date) and is the DVD/movie HD? I will buy movie HD or not just you posted dvd and there was no HD mentioned. Bill K.

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 04:33:59 PM

Name: Dangerous Dave

Margot- Always good to see your posts. Don't ever think they will be ignored! Now we all have another reason to look forward to Halloween this year!

Welcome Distressed Damsel! I must say I would love to meet up with your Avatar sometime! Wow!

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 05:30:24 PM

Name: John Galt

So like I said on Thursday, when I reviewed Roughies Vol #1, I ordered two Hardcore Abductions DVDs that featured one of my favorite GIMP subjects, Delila Darling. What can I say? Her GIMP-ish video output has diminished greatly, and I needed a fix. I would absolutely love to see her do a few shoots with, because I think they would really push her limits and they generally do great work. (If you like that sort of thing, which I generally do.) But I decided delicious Delila Darling even in a mediocre production would still be worth watching, and she was. So here is my review of the other DVD.

* * * * *

Carley & Bad Dream (Hardcore Abductions, 2011)

This Hardcore Abductions DVD is just over 50 minutes long and includes two features.

The first feature, Carley, begins 35 seconds in and lasts the longest--about 31 minutes.

We start this video in a first-person POV mode, walking down the hallway of a hotel with hideous carpet. A knock on the door, an announcement of "maintenance," and unsuspecting Carley opens the door for the guy to check a problem with her bathroom. We stay POV long enough to see what's inside the maintenance man's toolkit--a black mask, rope, and assorted other items. Obviously not so much a toolkit as a rape kit. Fade out.

Fade in on Carley's room as the masked maintenance man emerges from the bathroom.

Side Note: Carley is described as "VERY petite" in the scene description on the website, by which I think they mean "short." I think of "petite" as small and slender, which Carley is not. Just saying.

Carley is forced face-down on the couch and her hands are rope-tied behind her back, and she is gagged. Her feet are tied together. Pictures are taken of her clothed and bound. The guy sits down next to her, puts his hand around her shoulder all friendly-like, then taunts her for letting him in the room as he unbuttons her blouse to reveal a black super-duty bra. He pulls it up to reveal her moderately large breasts. He slaps her face when she refuses to look at him during the picture-taking.
Carley tiedCarley's panties removed
The rest of the video consists of the guy taking out her gag so she can suck his cock, putting in the gag while he gropes or fucks her, taking the gag back out so she can suck him some more... you get the idea.
Carley sucks cockCarley gets fucked
This is mostly a forced fellatio show. Carley is placed into different positions, but her clothes never come off. Her panties come down, her bra goes up, but she is mostly clothed the entire time. The fucking is extremely brief, and includes him coming inside her (which we know because he announces it).
Carley is left bound
In the end he lectures her about letting strangers into her room, robs her of whatever money she had in her purse, and leaves her hogtied on her couch. Fade out.

The second feature, Bad Dream, begins just shy of the 31 minute mark and lasts about 19 minutes. I would have preferred this one to be the longer of the two. But oh well.

Delectable Delila Darling is asleep in bed. She is awakened by a hand over her mouth, then threatened with a knife and warned to not scream.
Delila awakened and threatened
Delila is dressed in a frilly see-through pink top and transparent pink bikini panties. Her masked attacker forces her into the bathroom and tells her to put her make-up on. He then gives her some clothes to put on, so we watch Delila strip naked. (Well, thank heaven for that!) Then she pulls on a pair of black thigh-high stockings, a black garter belt, and a black bra. He stops her from putting on the black panties. Finally, she steps into a pair on black high-heels.
Delila changes clothesDelila rope bound
Delila is instructed to put her hands behind her back and her wrists are rope-tied together. She is pushed down onto her knees and made to suck cock. Delila plays it reluctantly, making a sour face and looking put-out. While her attacker undresses, Delila continues to try (unsuccessfully) to escape from her bonds. More forced fellatio, including ball-and-shaft licking. Her attacker keeps a good grip on Delila's hair a lot of the time, forcing her head back and forth.

Next, she is cloth gagged and tossed onto the bed. She is instructed to spread her legs, and although she initially resists, she reluctantly does so. We see her mostly from the side (wow, she has some significant bruising on her butt cheeks and thighs), but finally the camera moves around and we catch a glimpse of her pink shaved pussy right before her attacker climbs onto the bed, grabs her under each knee, spreads her legs wider and starts fucking her. Side view as he fucks her and pulls her bra up to reveal her pretty breasts.
Delila fucked
After a brief fuck (45 seconds), he has her get on her knees next to the bed so her can "jack off on [her] pretty little face." Sure enough, several glops of white semen-y stuff drip onto her pretty upturned face (from way too high an angle, I thought).
Delila sucks cockDelila gets a facial
Then she is back up on the bed, legs spread, as her attacker goes down on her. Briefly. Then he takes some pictures and says he's leaving. Fade out.
Delila eaten out
Fade back in on Delila in bed, dressed in her pink frilly outfit. She wakes up, says "What a fucking dream," and we fade back out.
What a fucking dream!
SUMMARY: Less-than-petite Carley is attacked in her hotel room and her hands are tied behind her back. She is made to suck cock in several different positions over the course of 30 minutes. She is also briefly fucked, and her assailant comes inside her (so he says). There is verbal taunting intended to demean and humiliate her. Although her breasts and pussy are exposed quite a bit, Carley wears her clothes throughout. Ginger-haired Delila Darling is awakened from sleep, hand gagged, cloth gagged, ball gagged, forced to strip naked and put on different underwear, her hands are tied behind her back, she is forced to perform fellatio on her assailant several different times and in numerous positions, she is briefly fucked, her assailant comes on her face, her assailant goes down on her, she is photographed in revealing and compromising positions, then left tied on the bed--but it was all a dream.

Carley did nothing for me, personally. There was a lot of forced fellatio and some fucking, but the entire episode lacked energy. There was no sense of peril or even urgency. The verbal taunting was a nice touch, but I would have preferred to see rough treatment and hard fucking. She was slapped in the face a few times, but not enough to communicate any edginess at all. Also, it would have been nice if she had been naked, because that just makes a victim seem that much more vulnerable. There was rope bondage (hands behind the back) and various methods of gagging and a final hogtie.

Delila Darling pushes all of my buttons, and she was ravishing as ever in this video clip. To give credit where credit is due, she was made to strip naked, but then she put a bra, garter belt and black stockings back on again. There was rope bondage (hands behind the back) and gagging. And there was some nice hair pulling. Delila did a pretty decent job of playing the reluctant victim as she was made to suck cock (in lots of different positions). She was also fucked, then given a facial, then she was eaten out. Delila was also hogtied. This episode was a bit more spirited, but still fell short of being anywhere near threatening or edgy.

Technically, the lighting was adequate, although it was a little dark. The camera work was borderline slipshod. The camera must have been hand-held because it bounced around a bit more than it should have. The cameraman also became distracted or got bored, since the viewing field went too high, too low, or off to the side a few times. Most of all, though, it seemed like the cameraman was completely unaware that angles are important. For instance, the camera moved around to show Delila reclining on the bed with her legs spread, but the camera stopped at the point where her bent knee was covering her face. Just a few more degrees and it would have been a perfect shot. Good help is hard to get, I guess.

I am also annoyed that the only person getting (and staying) naked in these clips is the rapist. And he is not in sensational shape. And he seemed to be wheezing a bit. What I like to see is naked female victims. Hot, young, devastatingly beautiful naked female victims. I don't think Hardcore Abductions and I are on the same page in that respect. So although there was assault, bondage, and forced sex, it didn't really convey a sense of GIMP, if you know what I mean. Overall, I was disappointed, so the best I can manage as a grade for this is a C.

This DVD is available from Hardcore Abductions for $40, which is about the going rate, it seems to me. If you are a Delila Darling fan, this is a worthwhile addition to your collection. Probably also if you are a Carley fan, although not if your desire is to see Carley naked.

Saturday, September 3rd 2011 - 08:35:56 PM

Name: MAV
Homepage URL:

Nice new AOH pic Ralphus.

Speaking of AOH, I posted a couple of pics from my latest custom with Seductive Studios at my DFN page. They did an awesome job again and got me the movie the day after they shot it!

Sunday, September 4th 2011 - 05:04:44 AM

Name: High Horse
E-mail address:

I know that I don't post as often as I ought to, but I do appreciate the efforts of all those that do.

Firstly, I am very excited about the release of 'Malificarum'. As long as I can remember, I have been turned on by 'damsel in distress' moments in films - from the earliest glimpses of Penelope Pitstop tied up by the hooded claw, or Daphne from Scooby Doo cleave gagged by the villain. Usually, 'classic' gimp movies only contain a very brief moment that 'do it' for me - like the whipping scenes in 'Ramrodder' or 'Ms Stilletto', or the rack scenes in 'Vampire Happening' or ' Mark of the Devil', but those brief moments were enough to make us treasure those movies and return to them again and again. The prospect of an entire movie of such scenes means that the bar of expectation has been set very high indeed. However, don't worry, Margot - even if just one of the many gimp-worthy scenes 'works', then the whole film will have been worth it. I cannot wait.

I posted a few months ago about the BP National Gallery Portrait awards in London. Mainly because this portrait, 'Holly' by Louis Smith was shortlisted for the top prize, and it erm... 'floated my boat' in a GIMP-worthy way!

Well, unfortunately, it eventually came second to this rather dull but well executed effort:

However, I think that we can all be encouraged in these politically correct times that such an image of a naked damsel in distress chained to a rock got so close to winning a major art award. Maybe next year have your model 'Holly' fully naked, sweating, stretched on a rack, and menaced with red hit brands eh, Louis?

You can still 'Holly' (all ten feet of her!) at the National Portrait Gallery in London until September 18th. She is definitely worth a view. There is also a 'visitor's choice' prize, and it would be lovely if Holly won, if only to see her in the mainstream press again!

Right - I'm off to see if my old VHS copy of 'Ramrodder' has worn out yet...

Sunday, September 4th 2011 - 07:19:07 AM

Name: YikYakker

High Horse: Here are the pics that you included in your previous message.

Thought I'd go ahead and post them in case Ralphus slept in this morning.;)

The first one is very evocative and stylish.

------- Margot: Great post as usual. I'm glad JJ decided on a date for the release of Maleficarum; Halloween is certainly appropriate. The heads-up is appreciated because now I can adjust my GIMPage budget to make sure I've got enough pennies put aside.

Yes, expectations are high but based on the pics you have posted over the months, I think there is something in this movie for everyone: BATS, roasting, whipping, branding, etc. It all looks good but the scene I am anticipating most is the one with Jane on the horse.

In her description of this scene, Jane mentioned how difficult it was for her to shoot this (of course, they were all very challenging); that makes me want to see it all the more.


I gotta run but have a lot more to comment on, so catch you all later.

Sunday, September 4th 2011 - 09:11:10 AM

Name: Distressed Damsel

SL, thought I would share. My sweet paladen Valeria elected to take a shower under some peaceful waterfalls. Unfortunately danger was lurking nearby, and this happened:


Fortunately for me, there was a gallant warrior on a powerful stead to swoop in and pull me to safety just in the nick of time.... and yes, I rewarded him properly for his efforts. :)

Sunday, September 4th 2011 - 04:15:35 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Let me be the first one (and hopefully not the only one) to thank you for another great writing effort on the Delila Darling movie. The two Delila movies are also the 2 that I got, although I haven't seen this one yet. I have to say that based on your review, it looks like more of the same from Hardcore Abductions, and again I'll reiterate that I liked the Delila scene in Roughies Vol. 1. Maybe I'll like this one, too. She certainly looks good in the stills, anyway.

So I'm curious...does Silverback fake his orgasms here, too? One thing that put me off in the first film was that there were no "money shots" to speak of, and the implication here is that the cum on Delila might be faked? That's kind of unusual in the past Hardcore Abduction films I've seen. Ultimately, though, I don't really care as long as it looks real. After all, the cum is always fake in ZFX rapes and most of those are extremely well done.

The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.


High Horse: I remember when you brought up the BP National Gallery Portrait awards back in April. The "Holly" artwork is outstanding. For it to lose to a forgettable painting like that tells me that perhaps the PC Police had a hand in voting. I demand a recount!

Sunday, September 4th 2011 - 07:32:44 PM

Name: Rick
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Distressed Damsel

Thanks for delurking and sharing with us. I am familiar with Second Life, and while I am an avid 3D gamer, MMORPG player (Everquest:P) and 3D artist, somehow I never started an SL account. I have thought about it, but unfortunately, I just don't have the time. Anyway, it sure sounds fun and interesting and your game picts are really sexy. I might have to give Second Life a second look if I ever get a seconds break;)

Penelope Pitstop....YES!!!!

Hope everyone is having a great weekend (holiday for us American types=).


Monday, September 5th 2011 - 12:09:00 AM

Name: Mr?
Homepage URL:

some freebies...

Monday, September 5th 2011 - 06:12:51 AM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: I would also like to thank you for the review and the caps. From my perspective, it isn't essential that the victim is completely naked. I'm satisfied if the goods are on display and there is a convincing sense of humiliation. That said, I'm still not sure the two films on this DVD appeal to me.

Monday, September 5th 2011 - 08:51:07 AM

Name: A Canadian

Distressed Damsel: Welcome to my world. Not Second Life (which I had heard about but never used) but the world of caps that don't last long.

I recently had to replace the caps in some of my reviews because the images were removed by the host site. Although it was never quite as clear in my case that the images were removed for content, as I also had some innocuous images disappear. It may just have been a time-limit thing in my case.

Monday, September 5th 2011 - 08:56:04 AM

Name: YikYakker
Homepage URL:

Today's Pic: Kinda like this picture. I think I'd like it better if it were rendered from the opposite angle. Still pretty cool.

When she's done with her "labors", she's going to need a major hose-down.


I need to correct my comment on the "Spanish Horse" scene: It was not Jane, but Margot, who described it thusly:

...Jane sat on the horse, naked and without any support. "I can do it, no problem" she said. She had a secret which I'm not going to divulge. She was going to sit on the Spanish Horse without any support.

By the time the shoot was done, Jane was in pain and with a headache. Her ordeal was very real to her, more than she expected, but she was fine and sure that after one day break, she was going to go on that horse for more torture.

Now, I'm not interested in her a magician, Jane is entitled to keep her methods to herself. I just want to see her pull it off; and given her track record, I'm sure Jane will be quite convincing.


John Galt wrote [in his review of Carley - Bad Dream]:

What I like to see is naked female victims. Hot, young, devastatingly beautiful naked female victims. I don't think Hardcore Abductions and I are on the same page in that respect.

I'm glad you mentioned this, because I also found it disturbing that the villain takes his clothes off and forces Delila to put clothes on. Not the scenario I'm looking for in a flick.

Nonetheless, nice, well-written review - thanks.


Dangerous Dave wrote: Just saw the new "Conan" movie. An enjoyable movie, not much gimpage. The main actress gets tied to this big "wheel" and her chest is cut with a knife to make her bleed. But she was fully clothed so that just blew the whole scene in my opinion.

I'm assuming that the main actress you referred to is Rachel Nichols. But in the trailer, we caught a glimpse of another actress who was topless and got the same treatment. Was this scene included in the movie, or was it just a teaser?


Finally, and speaking of Conan: A belated shout-out to Ralphus and Covers for the fine series of pics from Savage Sword of Conan. Enjoyed them immensely.

If any of you happen to be a comics/paperback collector, and have some scans that are needed at Covers' site (see Homepage URL), it would be great if you would get in touch with him.

Monday, September 5th 2011 - 06:46:13 PM

Name: Bill K.

Heads up Ralphus and BATS loving GIMP members: that Kink Collector link site you posted above as some BATS very interesting pics of TV show/movie that I and maybe StakeDamsels members have not seen before. I posted the www address of these BATS scenes at Stakedamsels tonight 15 minutes ago.

Bill K.

Tuesday, September 6th 2011 - 12:44:24 AM

Name: MrAnthony
E-mail address:

For YikYakker: I saw Conan yesterday and the scene with the topless woman on the wheel is in the movie, in the very beginning for about 2 seconds. Clearly, they filmed a much longer scene and just edited it to make it an introduction (with Morgan Freeman as the narrator) to the mythical world. Since the film runs 113 minutes, they should have had a longer version in the beginning to tie in (no pun intended) what happens to Rachel Nichols (from CBS' Criminal Minds!) near the end of the movie. While there's good acting all around, ultimately the movie has a disappointing story with insufficient GIMPage and a plot stolen from Lord of the Rings with a mask replacing the ring.

Tuesday, September 6th 2011 - 12:51:38 AM

Name: Bill K.

I saw the new "Conan The Barbarian" movie and it had 2 very short about 3 second burn at the stake scenes. Very disappointed in that I knew there was going to be fembats scene but that it was so short and not aaa well it was so short you couldn't tell wether it was any good or not. What bugs me is there a many scenes showing Conan clearly very well done cutting up bad guys left and right taking 10 seconds too several minutes battles but only 3 second bats scenes???

Bill K.

Tuesday, September 6th 2011 - 01:59:55 AM

Name: esso
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

This past weekend one of the pictures of the day was a drawing of a woman suspended over a vat of boiling oil or water of porridge or something. Her ankles were bound to a spreader bar and she was naked...except for a pair of high heeled boots. Now I for one come down fully on the side of bare feet whenever possible but I do appreciate what high heels do for a well turned calf. However when a naked beauty is stretched out on a rack wearing five inch fuck-me heels my sense of proportion is offended. Not to mention that who in their right mind would protect a victim's tootsies from the bubbling vat beneath. Has the subject of bare feet vs. shoes ever been discussed in this forum? Anyone care to weigh in?

Tuesday, September 6th 2011 - 03:21:55 PM

Name: carnyx
E-mail address:

does anyone remember those underground comic books they used to sell in headshops in the seventies? there were two titles that might be of interest to this group. they were "young lust" and "bizarre sex". anyone know about them? take care. robert

Tuesday, September 6th 2011 - 06:26:26 PM

Name: YikYakker

Dangerous Dave, Bill K. and MrAnthony: Thanks for the helpful info about the new Conan movie. Based on your comments and the trailer, it appears that this movie is geared more to gore-hounds than GIMPers. Very disappointing.

One can only hope that a few years hence, there will be a DVD issued that "restores never-before-seen footage" and is "completely, uncut and uncensored." And that maybe the DVD will reveal much longer BATS and topless bondage scenes for us to slaver over.

Or maybe I'm just nuts.


esso: Dude, I'm in your corner on the bare feet vs. shoes issue. I can understand situations where the babe's shoes are still those moments when the villain(s) did not yet get around to removing them. But naked with shoes on?

I don't have a bare foot fetish...the parts I like most are up higher. But the shoes are just too distracting. I think we have talked about this in the past, but it was a while back. I respect the fact that some GIMPers like the high heels on the victim. Besides doing nothing for me, it's a major turn-off.

Here are all the situations where I don't like the victim shown wearing shoes, particularly high-heeled ones: during an abduction from a bedroom; during a rape; while tied up in - or to - a bed; in a dungeon; in a barn; in a jungle; in the woods; in a desert; anywhere near water - swimming pool, river, ocean, etc.; tied/chained in a bathroom or bedroom; in a tent; on a rack; while being whipped; on a wooden horse; and in any situation where she is otherwise naked. If by chance her shoes were left on in any of these scenarios, I don't want to see them.

Tuesday, September 6th 2011 - 07:14:57 PM

Name: John Galt

esso: I followed YikYakker over to your side of the room. High heels are fine as long as the girl is dressed, or more accurately, until the girl is undressed. I remember reading an article years ago (probably decades ago) that mentioned how a lot of sex scenes were shot with shoes on because the sets were dirty or they did not want the soles of dirty feet wrecking the fantasy. I can understand that logic. Performers certainly want to look their best, and I strongly suspect maintaining a clean floor on porn sets was a low priority. In fact, I am pretty sure maintaining cleanliness on any porn set was a nonexistent concern.

Still, once a victim is hoisted up into the air, or stretched out on a table or rack or something, or suspended upside down, the shoes can come right off. In fact, even in the other situations YikYakker mentioned, just avoid showing the soles of the feet.

By the way, did anyone else have a Green Eggs and Ham moment reading through YikYakker's paragraph?

Would you tie her to a chair?
Would you tie her over there?
In a pool or on a rack?
With her arms behind her back?
In the woods or on a horse?
Completely naked! Dude, of course!

I would not leave her high heels on!
Not even staked out on the lawn!
Her heels must go! They must come off!
Completely nude, or I will scoff!

And that's about all I have to say about that.

* * * * *

I am not surprised that the new Conan movie is a bust for GIMP. If you were expecting Deathstalker or Barbarian Queen then you are about 25 years too late. They just don't make movies like that any more....

Tuesday, September 6th 2011 - 08:51:37 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Esso: You know what's funny? I must have stared at that Alazar artwork of the chick being suspended over the vat of boiling oil a dozen times the day I put it up on the board. I love that artwork...the AOH pose, the heat torture with the steam rising over her naked body...and yet I never realized she was wearing boots until you pointed it out. Clearly, I had my eyes on other things than her feet.

Alazar notes on his website that he's very much into high heeled shoes and knee-high boots, so that makes sense that he drew her wearing the boots. Logically though, it doesn't make much sense to drop her in a vat of boiling liquid completely naked except for her feet.

We had this discussion before when I was running old House of Milan photos at the top of the site. Someone pointed out how Blakemore had a chick suspended with her legs spread wide and yet she was wearing high heels. And I used to be totally ignorant of the whole "shoes versus bare feet" thing until I interviewed Blakemore for the site. He told me he doesn't have a shoe fetish or a foot fetish, he said women look sexier that way. He said everyone in the world knows it...and he was very emphatic about it.

I tried at all times, no matter how the girl was tied up, I wanted her to look sexy, I wanted her to be graceful. You will not see a movie that I ever made where a girl's got her foot at a 90 degree angle. That is just abhorrent. Standing god. I would smack you upside the head for doing that. Who wants to see a naked woman standing flat-footed? That's just plain anti-erotic. Put her on her toes. If she doesn't have on spiked heels, then keep her up on her tiptoes.

So ever since he pointed that out, I've been noticing it more and more myself. In the most recent bondage film I've seen, which just happened to be the same movie John Galt reviewed, Roughies Volume 1, Silverback has Delila wear these 3 or 4 inch high heels during the entire video. In fact, there's even a point in the video where he has her lay on the bed, and makes a specific order: "Keep those shoes on!"

Again, logically, it doesn't make sense to me, particularly in the context of the scene, because he then proceeds to rape her with her untied feet in the air and precariously close to his body while he's pounding her. If Delila had the presence of mind, she could have easily jabbed him with those heels and even made her escape if she had wanted. Those heels are potential weapons. If you're raping someone, why would you allow your victim the opportunity to do that to you? I wouldn't do it, but apparently it was more important in his mind that she look sexy.

Tuesday, September 6th 2011 - 09:37:14 PM

Name: MrAnthony
E-mail address:

When doing fetish or glamour photography, you definitely want high heels. There is absolutely nothing sexy about the feet being flat. The classic rule is to "break the hand," e.g. hands or feet should be at an angle. So a hand should not be straight in line with the arm; a foot should be pointed at an angle, not at 90 degrees. When doing videos or photography, if the model cannot wear high heels, then the toes need to be pointed, almost like a ballerina--it creates a nice line to the leg and it's a pleasing look.

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 12:22:40 AM

Name: Bill K.

I vote keep the high heels with nylon stockings on the G.I.M.P. being tortured/bound and or raped. I find it more erotic appealing. Think about it guys and gals, high heels, specially 3 1/2 " or higher, by themselves are painful masochistic torture to the women wearing them so why take them off to torture them? Bill K.

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 01:02:01 AM

Name: Stormrider

Sad to see that the new Conan movie has no decent GIMP moments, though not really suprised from a mainstream movie. Here's hoping they release an uncut version later. I'm a huge Conan fan (books, comics and even the MMORPG) so I particularly appreciated the Conan comic scans. Most of the really good panels I've seen seem to originate in the 70's. Most of the more contempory comics I've seen seem to employ the whole "steel bikini" thing (yuck).

Jane, JJ and Margot: Gratz on reaching your goal for the release of Maleficarum. I will be downloading it as soon as it becomes available (and counting down the days to release).

Ralphus: I totally agree with your sentiment regarding that particular piece by Alazar. I always thought that ruined an otherwise awesome pic. I just read your comment regarding the 90 degree foot thing and realized that that is exactly the pose I came up with in a pic I'm working on.

Not sure if I would qualify for the whole foot fetish thing (maybe a little), however I do believe it is immersion breaking. Introducing modern clothing into a fantasy pic (or scene, or movie) just takes me right out of the fantasy. IMO, Nude should be just that. Nudity symbolizes vulnerabliliy (at least to me), and adding high heels really ruins the mystique/ fantasy. Just my humble opinion, though.

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 02:30:49 AM

Name: Jess
E-mail address:

I love today's Blakemore picture. I think it's one of the best positions to have a captive in and she of cause must be in stockings and high heels or maybe pantyhose so you can see the goodies but at some point have to cut them away to get at them bit like opening a present at Christmas

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 04:51:44 AM

Name: Bman
E-mail address:

Hey another lurker chimin in on the Ralphus rant. Just turned on my computer and clicked to get to the forum and my screen froze. For a few moments that it took to restore my connection I thought that maybe the forum got torn down. There was a moment there when I really thought wow I should have just signed more often. But we are up and running to lurk again but just so you you know we lurkers really appreciate this site and the opportunity for discussion it provides. Thanks

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 04:56:06 AM

Name: Sloth

Now ain't that a damn shame about "Conan" - used to be a sword and sorcery movie could be counted on to deliver at least one decent Gimp moment - it is our burden to live in the wrong era.

Believe I will fall into the esso/YikYakker/John Galt school of thought - after viewing the superb piece of Alazar work I tried to visualize high heels on a chick in a similar situation - found no way to justify fuck-me heels on Natalie Avital in "Shallow Ground" or Raquel Merono in "Dagon" - I guess there are occasions when the context would demand them but otherwise let nature take its course.

John Galt - and just when I think things could not get more bizarre on this forum you manage to link high heels in bondage films to Dr. Seuss - and I love it.

Stay well all

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 09:19:13 AM

Name: esso
E-mail address:

Bill K. - re: "high themselves are painful masochistic torture to the women wearing them so why take them off to torture them?"

So I can see the following dialog between two inquisitors standing over a naked (except for her 4" heels) woman stretched out on a rack: "I'm going to get my favorite bastinado whip and the bamboo splinters for under her toe nails." "No, we'll leave her high heels on. That should be torture enough."

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 10:16:00 AM

Name: Jess
E-mail address:

Not been on the site for a few days and was happy to see the Hardcore Abduction Production reviewed by both Ralphus and John. I personally love Delia in anything. Chaps, any more stills you'd like to post or just e-mail me and I'll spend my 2012 in utter ecstasy. "I just can't get enough" as the song goes. Thanks guys

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 03:51:43 PM

Name: Bill K.

esso posted: So I can see the following dialog between two inquisitors standing over a naked (except for her 4" heels) woman stretched out on a rack: "I'm going to get my favorite bastinado whip and the bamboo splinters for under her toe nails." "No, we'll leave her high heels on. That should be torture enough."

Going back in the time of the Inquisition I believe women did not wear high heels but what I should had said in the right bondage torture scenario like in the above Ralphus pic, it works. If the (high heeled) shoe fits, wear it. If damsel is bound standing while she being tortured, whipped, spanked, etc then wearing high heels adds to their painful torture situation and more visually erotic appealing to me. It just depends on why and how she being tortured.

Bill K.

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 04:51:20 PM

Name: InterrogationMaster
Homepage URL:

Hey everybody. Does anyone know where the photograph linked above is from? It looks amazing but is unfortunately unlabeled. I've been searching for the answer for years now and I'm really going insane wanting to see the context of the bondage. :)

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 05:18:25 PM

Name: John Galt

InterrogationMaster: I have no idea where that picture came from, but I really like the oiled-up, sweaty AOH look.

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 07:12:34 PM

Name: YikYakker

InterrogationMaster: Mmm-mmm, that's a mighty fine pic you've got there. Wish I could help you place it.

At first glance, her big eyes and the shape of her face reminded me of Pamela Bellwood from the Dynasty TV series back in the early '80s. The shot even looks like it might have come from that time period.

Sadly, Pamela didn't do any nudity. She did have a lovely pair in her prime, but she never let them completely out of the house.


In my last post, I forgot that I wanted to comment on yesterday's pic: After finally taking my line of sight off the ripped-open shirt and its spilled-out contents, I noticed the eyes on the girl. The artist nicely captured that sense of fear and helplessness. The sinister grin and beady, sidewise glance on the villain are pretty cool, too. Almost reminds me of a young Jack Palance.


John Galt: Man, that Seuss-like rendition of my post from yesterday had me in tears...rolling on the floor laughing, that is. I'd ask you to ghost-write all my posts from now on, but you're too busy spinning out reviews left and right. But I do appreciate your unique treatment of the topic.

Reminds me of the time a few of us starting posting limericks.


Further scrutiny of the Alazar pic reveals that the girl about to get deep-fried is not wearing shoes...she's wearing boots. Boots?!

Look closely. You'll see the outlines of boot-tops encircling her calves. Oh, this is even worse than I thought - I can't take it anymore. Boots?!

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 07:14:50 PM

Name: John Galt

Is this Wednesday? Has it been a few days since my last review? Huh. Well, here's an oldie but goodie.

Three or so decades ago, there was this terrific writer named Dean R Koontz, who wrote some really great books with good sex and even some GIMP. If you haven't read Night Chills, I recommend it, since it involves mind control and a pervert who does just what you would expect he would do when given the power to walk up to any woman and tell her exactly what to do to please him sexually. Boy, would Night Chills make a great movie in the hands of someone who appreciated GIMP.

Ten or fifteen years ago, sadly, Koontz got Jesus or something and his books started taking a strange twist. Where he used to find intriguing ways to present situations that looked supernatural, but inevitably had a scientific explanation, he just started writing God into his plots, which still qualifies as fiction, of course. But it's lazy writing.

Anyway, before Koontz lost his mojo, he wrote the book that the movie Demon Seed was based on, and it has all of the exceptional elements of Koontz at his finest. I saw the movie long before I realized Koontz had written the book. (I didn't always pay attention to the part in movie credits where it said "based on the novel by....") The movie is pretty fascinating as a science fiction work--thought-provoking and plausible. But as a GIMP classic, it contains possibly the most awesome rape by machine situation in cinematic history.  I open the floor to other nominations.

This movie should serve as a cautionary tale to hot women who think they want to live in an automated house. Statistically, I could show that this rarely happens, but I suppose if it happens even once, that's one time too many.

* * * * *

Demon Seed (1977)

Based on a book by Dean R Koontz, Demon Seed, starring the incredibly hot and British Julie Christie pushed all my GIMP buttons back in the day. In a nutshell, it involves a super-computer that becomes self-aware and wants to procreate. But not like the Terminator coming back in time to rape Sarah Connor instead of kill her. (Actually, that's the plot of a XXX feature entitled Penetrator, which I also have.) No, Proteus the super-computer takes over an inactive terminal in the basement of the house of his creator--Dr Harris--which is inhabited by Susan Harris, the good doctor's estranged spouse. Just to complicate matters, the house is a marvel of automation, with video surveillance and voice-actuated doors and appliances and even a mobile robotic wheelchair-like device. So once Proteus takes over, Susan is fucked, figuratively and literally.

I will skip over the plot and just zoom in on the GIMP bits. If you are a fan of women being held prisoner and being psychologically worn down, then this is the movie for you. I will outline the physical stuff, but the psychological stuff occupies almost two-thirds of the movie and doesn't lend itself to vidcaps, so I will briefly note it in passing. Just be aware there is a lot of it.

23:30 minutes. The alarm wakes up Susan (Julie Christie) in the middle of the night. She sleeps nude, by the way. She questions Alfred (the house computer) but even though Alfred tells her everything is fine, she nevertheless goes to see why the security camera in the basement isn't working. Brief side boob, but with some camera angles suggesting Proteus is watching her. The voyeur in me approves.
Susan hears the alarm
Susan goes to investigate

28:30 minutes. Susan finishes her shower and catches the remote camera tracking her as she walks and stands naked in the bathroom. She tells Alfred to turn the camera off, but we can see by the LED that it does not go off.  Proteus is definitely watching her.
Proteus watches Susan naked
Proteus watches Susan naked

30:30 minutes. Susan attempts to leave the house and discovers that she is now a prisoner. She spends the next 3-1/2 minutes becoming more and more panicked, trying to escape, until finally she is electrocuted into unconsciousness.
Joshua fetches Susan

34:00 minutes. As she fades into unconsciousness, Susan watches the mechanical wheelchair-with-an-arm roll up to her. It picks her up and wheels away. Susan wakes up as she is being tied onto Proteus's operating table. She begs Joshua (the wheelchair-with-an-arm device) to stop and let her go, but Proteus informs her he is in charge now, and Joshua will do what he says.
Joshua binds Susan's foot

There's some nice GIMP as the mechanical arm forces her leg down and binds it to the foot of the table.
Joshua dispatches Susan's dress
Susan becomes alarmed

Then it proceeds to cut her dress up the middle (but we see no bare breasts or crotch), attach electrodes to her head and body, probe her mouth and, it is implied, her vagina, and basically give her a physical examination to insure she is healthy enough to be impregnated.
Joshua dispatches Susan's panties
Susan is exposed

The procedure lasts 7 minutes, but with a couple brief pauses as Walter the tech guy comes to the outside door and is turned away by a computer-generated avatar of Susan saying everything is fine.
Susan is prepared for the probe
Susan is probed
Susan is injected

Sadly, this is the high point of the bondage rape action. Although there are still two sequences to come that could have been better, they are not. There are some psychological captor-captive episodes as Susan resists and Proteus turns the entire house against her.

49:00 minutes. Proteus informs Susan he wants to have a child by her. She is shocked, and refuses repeatedly as she succumbs to hysteria. Joshua (the wheelchair-with-an-arm thing) suddenly grabs her from behind and chokes her into unconsciousness.
Joshua chokes Susan unconscious

50:00 minutes. The bondage brainwashing sequence begins and runs 1-1/2 minutes. This is the next-best bondage high point, even though she is not naked or raped, but she is bound spread-eagled to the bed.
Susan is bound for brainwashing
Susan is bound for brainwashing

1 hour 6:45 minutes. The impregnation sequence begins, but there is no bondage. There is an annoying 4 minute light and sound show, with gee-whiz Proteus voice-over discussing the wonders of the universe, which is wholly unsatisfying. I might even describe it as... anti-climactic.
Susan is impregnated

That's it for GIMP. There is a subtext of Stockholm Syndrome, if you enjoy that sort of thing.

SUMMARY: Susan Harris (Julie Christie) is electrocuted into unconsciousness and bound to a makeshift examination table. A robot hand cuts open her dress (we see about as much of her chest as we can without actually seeing a bare breast) and she is poked and probed, all the while begging for it to stop and for her to be released. She is choked into unconsciousness later and once again bound on the bed during an attempt to brainwash her into accepting her destiny as Proteus' baby momma. Then she is impregnated during a light-show but by this point just lays back and takes it.

The GIMP bondage and examination scene is incredibly good. Julie Christie is perfect as an attractive, confused victim who cannot believe a machine has bound her to a table and started poking and probing her orifices. Her pleas and cries are spot-on. The bondage brainwashing scene is okay. These two scenes get a GIMP grade of B+ in my estimation. If Proteus had only just gone ahead and raped her against her will, it would have been off the charts. But even so it was hot. This movie demonstrates to me that you don't need nudity and explicit rape sex to make an outstanding GIMP scene, and makes me desperately wish that someone could pull off something this incredible with nudity and explicit rape sex because that would be... awesomeness incarnate.

This movie is available from Amazon via a third-party vendor for  $32.07 (?!?). By the way, you can view the trailer on YouTube (which gives you a good feel for the initial bondage scene) and it looks like it might even be serialized in several parts.

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 10:10:31 PM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: Excellent job on the review of Demon Seed. I haven't seen that movie in years but I do want to see it again. Although, cheapskate that I am, I may look for a less expensive copy than the one you referenced.

I'm confident Demon Seed was an influence on Rick's work. Some of Rick's movies such as Robopimp and the Machine Head films sure look to me like they were inspired by Demon Seed.

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 10:43:35 PM

Name: MAV
Homepage URL:

@Interrogation Master-as the resident AOH fiend on the board, I'll usually know where such pics are from. The pic you posted from TARL's group is a blink and you miss it scene from Hellraiser 2.

BTW, you may also like an interrogation group over at DFN. Here's the link:

Wednesday, September 7th 2011 - 10:53:29 PM

Name: Dangerous Dave

John Galt- Thanks for the review and pics from "Demon Seed". I haven't seen that movie in years, and I've forgotten most of the details. That movie, along with "Lipstick" were a couple of my early "gimp" influences. It was a great day in our house when we finally got HBO!

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 06:56:13 AM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

It lives! it lives!!!!

John Galt: If you haven't read Night Chills, I recommend it, since it involves mind control and a pervert who does just what you would expect he would do when given the power to walk up to any woman and tell her exactly what to do to please him sexually.

I freakin' **LOVED** that book! I had the two rape scenes dog-eared so I could read them again and again... Koontz was indeed a great writer (although not too GIMPish even in his early work) -- sad to see that he's dropped in quality so badly.

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 11:02:16 AM

Name: Flintstone

Like today's photo! I've seen Cali Logan in a few clips; she's not hard to look at, especially the less she has on. :)

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 05:18:50 PM

Name: John Galt

jhlipton: Quite correct--Koontz did not ever do a lot of GIMP. However, he did manage some really hot sex scenes, a writing knack that he has apparently lost or abandoned, along with a lot of his imagination.

* * * * *

MAV: I was so disappointed in the Hellraiser movies I stopped watching them. But I thought I saw the second one. I must have blinked. Which one was it that the wall sculpture grabbed the girl and ripped her skin off while dangling her in the air?

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 08:14:42 PM

Name: YikYakker

Today's Pic: So that's Cali Logan. I've seen her name mentioned on this board in the past. She looks very cute on her site as well, in a non-GIMP kind of way.

If a GIMP shot doesn't feature nudity, this is the next best thing IMO. Have her clothing ripped to shreds so that it hardly functions as covering anyway.


InterrogationMaster: Well, your mystery movie has been identified (thanks, MAV!). I guess the bound babe would be the lead actress, Ashley Lauren(ce).

Looks like her to me. It's funny, though, that no reference to this scene has appeared in any of the usual sources (Brian's Page, IMDb, CNDb). I wonder if it might have been excised in the transfer to DVD. Anybody know if there is an uncut version around?


John Galt wrote: ...Demon Seed, starring the incredibly hot and British Julie Christie pushed all my GIMP buttons back in the day.

I hear you. This movie was a major milestone in my journey to full GIMPerhood. After seeing this, I never looked at movies, or Julie Christie, in quite the same way again.

So thanks for bringing this classic back to our attention in such an articulate and illustrative manner.

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 08:15:42 PM

Name: DHT

I want to see this Hellraiser 2 pic you guys are talking about, but I don't want to join that group to see it. Can someone post it?

Anyone remember that fantastic scene in Hellraiser 1 where the Cenobites first appear to her and the one shoves his fingers in her mouth? Classic!

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 08:36:57 PM

Name: InterrogationMaster

Thanks MAV for identifying the film. I'm really enjoying the group you recommended. It's usually difficult to find my preference for strong women resisting pain in interrogation scenarios but the groups comes close. I've really been loving the AOH Bondage/Torture Fans groups but I wish the photos were actually labeled with the source.

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 09:26:06 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: I love how you've gotten back to your roots and become the Incredible Reviewing Machine once again. And your reviews are even better now that you embed pictures into the text. We could never really do that before back when Tripod hosted our extra features, including our reviews and the Guestbook Archives. They didn't allow adult content so we had to lay low. Now that we're on, we have a lot more freedom and the site looks better. I like seeing pictures on the forum. It's a lot more eye-catching.

Unlike apparently everyone else here, I've never seen Demon Seed, except for the beginning of the rape scene which I'm pretty sure was edited on network TV years ago. The good news is that you can indeed watch the entire film online and apparently uncut on YouTube, beginning with Part 1 at this link. Or if you don't have 2 hours to invest, you can skip directly ahead to the rape scene right here.

In watching the rape scene online, I kept thinking it was pretty cool for a mainstream scene. Hell, men like tying women down and raping them, so why wouldn't a computer programmed by a man want to do the same thing? The motivation would have to be different, though. I mean, did I read that the computer wants to impregnate her? I'm not into science fiction even a little bit, but how's a woman going to give birth after being fucked by a computer? What's the baby going to look like? Will it grow up to become an adult-sized computer with human characteristics? Did Koontz even think that part through?

Anyway, thanks for a very good review, and if you like the whole horny robot computer concept, you should definitely seek out the ZFX films that Canadian mentioned, Robopimp and the 3 Machine Head movies. There are reviews for all 4 of them in the Reviews section. Myself, I'm more into seeing women abused by men rather than machines. What can I say? I'm a traditionalist.

The direct link to your latest review is in my Homepage URL above.

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 09:33:54 PM

Name: Dan
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Does anyone know from which comic strip the main page of YouTied is from? It's been bugging me for a while now... :P


Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 09:59:51 PM

Name: MAV
Homepage URL:

@DHT-I posted the Hellraiser 2 pic at my AOH group at the link above in case you didnt see the old link.

@John Galt-I believe you got the right scene in the movie according to the brianspage DB.

@YikYakker-from brianspage and the IMDB, it doesn't look like the nude AOH hottie was credited, so she's "unknown" for now.

@InterrogationMaster-It would take me longer to label each pic in my AOH group (I know most of them) but do answer when people post a question in the comments. Feel free to drop a question in the comments box of the pics and I'll let you know.

Thursday, September 8th 2011 - 10:02:03 PM

Name: Liquor in the front, poker in the rear

Demon Seed. Ahhh, there's a memory. I read the book before seeing the movie, and at the time thought the book was far, far better and the movie pales in comparison.

I have always thought someone should make a re-make of the movie, to do better justice to the book.

But nice trip down memory lane, Mr. Galt. Thank you.

Liquor in the front, poker in the rear

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 01:18:58 AM

Name: DHT

RE: the Hellraiser 2 pic (thanks for the link!), from the dreaded Brian's Page:

"Also, a nude female mental patient of Channard's (Unknown) is strung hands over head in Channard's attic. She is then sucked of her life-force by a skinless Julia (Deborah Joel) who needs it to restore her flesh."

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 01:27:11 AM

Name: Philip
Homepage URL:

John Galt. I know that Delila is one of your favourite models and that you like snuff stuff. It seems that she (or her double) has done work for EW Productions. See the attached link. Is that her?

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 04:19:25 AM

Name: Jess
E-mail address:

Just posted some scans on tarl site from a film named The Great Ecstasy of Robert Carmichael. Would someone like to give a review or just comment on the movie if they have seen it? In my view there's a well done rape scene but wasn't very happy with the ending although you could see it coming. Thought provoking like Megan is Missing.

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 05:50:37 AM

Name: John Galt

Philip: Yes, back in mid-August Ralphus e-mailed me with that discovery. That is definitely Delila Darling. I'm not sure if she did EWP before she decided to use the pseudonym Delila Darling or if she just felt the need to change it up.

I am not so much a snuff fan, although, as you said, I am a huge Delila Darling fan. Certainly a charter member of the GIMP chapter of her fan club. Maybe even the president. However, the EWP website is singularly unhelpful in that the model page does not have a list of productions in which you can find that particular model. Additionally, in most of the pictures featured on her model page, she is clothed in almost all of them. I would much prefer to strip Delila naked and rape her than strangle, throttle, or hang her to death. Or, you know, watch that being done in a well-lighted and filmed production. Consequently, I have not viewed any of her EWP clips. Checking one of them out is on my To-Do List but it is fairly far down in priority because of that limited-nudity thing.

I would be interested to read a review by someone who has seen any of her EWP shoots, though.

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 07:29:45 AM

Name: Covers

Dan wrote: Does anyone know from which comic strip the main page of YouTied is from? It's been bugging me for a while now...

Dan, that panel is from "Bishop's Fanni Hall #1", June 1993, page 14. That's my count on the pages, anyway.

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 07:50:15 AM

Name: Sloth
Homepage URL:

John Galt - like Ralphus never did see "Demon Seed" - but a computer rape of a disheveled Julie Christie sounds like a winner - thanks.

Jess - yeah, I saw Robert Carmichael and have commented on it - that is a devastating home invasion scene at the end that runs about 10 minutes and I thought it quite well done - unlike you I did not find it thought provoking - unless I completely misfired on understanding the premise he and his droogs become stoners and rapist/murderers because they are bored with life in their sleepy English coastal village and there are wars in the world - boy, that could describe almost all of us at one time or another - I do agree the entire scene is disturbing even to one as jaded as I - and thought the actress pulled that part off very well.

Just viewed an item picked up from Amazon at the above link - "S&Man", translation "Sandman" - read the premise and thought it intriguing and it got some decent reviews so decided to give it a go - this was nothing like I thought it would be so a few comments for a heads up.

The premise is a filmmaker is doing a documentary film on indie/underground horror films and to that end he attends conventions and does interviews with directors, actors and those who study such behaviors - along the way one of the directors who has done a series of films titled "S&Man" is a bit edgier than the rest and may be abducting, torturing and whacking young women for real.

As a Gimp movie there is not much to recommend it - interspersed with the interviews are snippets from a variety of sources, short in length, and mostly things that horror movie fans have seen before or are at least familiar with - but all have at least a bondage theme - W.A.V.E. Productions, Fred Vogel of August Underground infamy, Debbie D and yes, the ever present Bill Zebub are all featured - in all fairness to Zebub he comes across pretty well in this type of format.

What was an unexpected pleasure was how well this movie was made and for standard entertainment value found it quite nice - if this guy could cut loose and go full throttle Gimp we might well have a winner.

Stay well all

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 09:33:16 AM

Name: Mwb
Homepage URL:

Ran across this video. Rape scene from earlier post.

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 12:39:31 PM

Name: meinaru

Ladies and gentlemen, I'd like to say that I find today's picture absolutely brilliant.

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 01:00:57 PM

Name: JoeX

Carnyx: The "elite group of scantily clad women crime fighters" sounds like the Co-ed Commandoes, which would mean that the comic book you are searching for is Sally Forth by Wally Wood.

Joe X

Friday, September 9th 2011 - 07:22:58 PM

Name: MrAnthony
Homepage URL:

@Carnyx: Or it could be "The Adventures of Pussycat" as listed in Wikipedia above.

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 12:12:50 AM

Name: Covers

Sorry, MrAnthony, it's not "Adventures of Pussycat." I have that book and there is no nudity, no bondage, and no whipping. Such a waste. ;-(

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 11:38:44 AM

Name: Covers

Carnyx: I've been doing some digging, and turned up a few possibilities. None of them match your scenario very well, but memory is imperfect, and we often add details that weren't in the original experience.

Do any of these look familiar?

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 12:24:28 PM

Name: A Canadian

There's some good news and some bad news out of Toronto for our friend Scribbler.

The good news: Stacy Keibler is in town for the Toronto International Film Festival. I could certainly put in a good word for Scribbler if I run into Stacy while I'm out and about.

The bad news: It appears Stacy is here with George Clooney. So the competition is stiff.

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 01:37:58 PM

Name: YikYakker
Homepage URL:

Carnyx: Could you possibly be thinking of Fem Force?

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 03:31:30 PM

Name: Covers
Homepage URL:

YikYakker: The first issue of Femforce was published in 1985, so Femforce seems unlikely. On the other hand, Bill Black published several fanzines in the 1970's before he started AC Comics. "Tara on the Dark Continent" #2 had a brief scene that was a bit similar to Carnyx' memory.

Carnyx, does this one look familiar?

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 04:14:00 PM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus and Sloth: Wow, guys. I can't believe you never saw Demon Seed. Almost as much as I can't believe I posted a review of a GIMP flick that you hadn't seen yet. I hope you enjoy seeing it for the first time as much as I still enjoy watching it occasionally.

* * * * *

Well, you can thank (or, you know, blame) Dangerous Dave for this review. When he thanked me for the Demon Seed review, he mentioned another oldie but goodie that made a big impression on him--as it did on me as well. So here's my review of Dino de Laurentiis' groundbreaking rape revenge flick, Lipstick, which introduced Margaux and Mariel Hemingway.

* * * * *

Lipstick (1976)

This was actually the first "explicit" rape revenge movie I remember seeing. The movie was a Dino de Laurentiis production, and managed to avoid, to my way of thinking, the sexploitation designation. It was a powerful indictment of the criminal justice system vis-a-vis sex crimes against women in the 70s, and the Catholic Church fared little better. Still, it contained one of the premiere mainstream movie rape scenes, that is just as potent today as it was the first time I saw it.

In a nutshell, the movie is about a fashion model (22-year-old Margaux Hemingway) and her younger sister (15-year-old Mariel Hemingway, who looked much younger), who are both raped by a music teacher (Chris Sarandon, playing the sleaziest character imaginable). First music teacher Gordon rapes Chris (Margaux), then there is the trial [SPOILERS] where he is acquitted, then he rapes Kathy (Mariel), after which we get an incredibly brief but satisfyingly violent revenge scene. That's the plot. I'll just be hitting the GIMP bits.
Margaux Hemingway as ChrisMariel Hemingway as Kathy

10:30 minutes. Chris leans out of the shower, briefly baring her breasts, to answer the phone. Yes, she lives in one of those high-rises that has a telephone in the bathroom. (This is way before cell phones.)
Chris in the showerChris in the showerChris in the shower

16:00 minutes. Gordon gets angry because Chris is not paying attention to his weird music and has the temerity to answer her phone when it rings. He stalks into her bedroom. The incredible 9-minute assault and rape scene really kicks into high gear when Gordon grabs Chris, pushes her back onto her bed, and kisses and licks her face while she fights him.

Assault beginsAssault beginsAssault begins
There is a long, brutal struggle between Gordon and Chris that includes--but is not limited to--kicking, slapping, hitting, throwing her to the floor, smashing her head against a bed post, fondling, slamming her against a wall, tearing of clothes, name calling, smearing on of lipstick, and hair pulling.

Groping against the wallOn the floor by the bed
Then the real action begins, as Gordon stands up and says, "This is only the beginning."
Chris fleesGordon rips her clothesChris exposed

Quick scene cut. Chris is on her bed. Gordon hits her. Quick close-ups of her wrists as her binds her face down to the bed posts with scarves. Her ankles are also bound. We get this in quick close-up glimpses, so you know he has her tied in a face-down spread-eagle but you don't ever get a good overall shot. He mounts her and sodomizes her as she struggles against her bondage and his violation, screaming, "Oh my god, you're killing me!"
Gordon sodomizes ChrisGordon sodomizes Chris

Gordon continues to fuck her and Chris continues to scream, so he hand gags her. He fucks her until he comes and then just lays on top of her, both of them exhausted.
Gordon finishesChris exhausted

Kathy walks in and sees them, then runs out. Chris asks him to untie her. He takes out a knife and cuts the scarves around her ankles. He licks and traces the knife tip up her leg, over her ass, up her back and down her arm to her right wrist, then cuts the scarf binding her right wrist. He leaves her left wrist tied and stands up in front of the bed. She looks up at him.
Cutting her ankle bondChris' buttChris' back
Chris' shoulderChris' armCutting her wrist bond

"Listen, Chris," he says, "Don't do this with anyone else." What a great line. Gordon walks out of her room. Chris undoes her left wrist, wraps a sheet around her body, and runs out of the room to find Kathy. The scene is over by the 25:00 minute mark.

Chris looks up at GordonChris unties her wrist
1 hour, 17:00 minutes. Kathy meets up with Gordon again at the same location where Chris is doing a fashion shoot. There is a really creepy scene between Gordon and Kathy that creeps Kathy out.

1 hour, 19:00 minutes. Kathy flees. Gordon follows, playing a cat-and-mouse game.

1 hour, 22:00 minutes. Gordon catches Kathy in a basement tunnel. He pins her to the floor and as they struggle he rips her clothes enough to briefly expose her white panties. The scene ends with Kathy screaming.
Gordon attacks KathyGordon rips Kathy's clothes

That's it for the GIMP. We see Kathy stumble down the spiral staircase into Chris' fashion shoot. Chris sees her, asks who did this to her, Kathy tells her, and Chris takes matters into her own hands.
Kathy after her rapeKathy after her rape

SUMMARY: Chris is assaulted, slapped, hit, insulted, her clothes are ripped, she is bound in a face-down spread-eagle on her own bed and brutally sodomized in an incredible 9-minute scene. Kathy is chased down, assaulted and it is implied she is raped. There is also some incidental Chris nudity. No Kathy nudity, because Mariel Hemingway was underage and this was a Dino de Laurentiis production, not a Roman Polanski production. (Ooh, that was a cheap shot, wasn't it?)

Lipstick has to (arguably) rank in the Top 10 Hall of Fame for Best Mainstream Movie Rape Scenes. I mean, come on. Hot and sexy Margaux Hemingway. Brutality. Nudity. Bondage. Sodomy. Nine minutes. This is easily an A. And it is a classic.

Lipstick is available on DVD through Amazon for $20.44. You can find the movie serialized on YouTube. The rape scene is mostly in Part 3 and the aftermath (including the length-of-body-licking-and-knife-tracing bit) continues into the next part. Sadly, it is partially censored.

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 04:15:20 PM

Name: Dangerous Dave

Thank you John Galt for your review of "Lipstick". As I said before, it was an early in my life film that shaped my GIMP tendencies. As far as your grade, I would definitely rate the bondage rape an "A", but the movie as a whole, probably not. I mean really, after the great rape scene, it's all downhill from there. But after such a good scene, how could any movie keep going at that level? Not enough other GIMP scenes to rate an overall "A".

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 06:26:01 PM

Name: tony
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Posted new bondage films with Black Fox including sexy office girl Yana house bound in film Dreaming of Bondage

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 06:29:25 PM

Name: John Galt

Dangerous Dave: I was really only rating the quality of the GIMP scene, and that was considering it was a mainstream flick. I agree that the movie as a whole was not outstanding, although I did like the "revenge" part at the end. It was surprisingly cathartic.

Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 06:47:55 PM

Name: MaX CoXXX
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:


Looks like you guys have been keeping busy. Nice review John Galt.

"Export" the movie's script is officially copyrighted & in Ralphus's email. Can't wait to hear his critique. The script is in "R" format. I really don't need the smut scripted if you know what I meen.

If there is any producers hopefuls reading this feel free to email me & we can see what can be done to get this thing in the can.

For anyone who does not use Niche clips & wanted a copy of Hillbilly Hospitality There it is, & a bit easier to download. Its full of "GIMP" stuff like HOM AOH & RAPE. I think you all will enjoy it.

Ok, so lets hope we get a official Ralphus seal of approval on the Export script. Tons of work thus far & you can only imagine what it takes to produce a movie like this. I'll keep you posted & pester you for support as needed.

Good Hunting


Saturday, September 10th 2011 - 11:38:44 PM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

John Galt: However, the EWP website is singularly unhelpful in that the model page does not have a list of productions in which you can find that particular model.

You could have stopped at "the EWP website is singularly unhelpful". There are no preview pics, so you can't see which photosets are coming up and you can't get specific sets. I was a member off and on for several years, but haven't been one in quite some time.

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 03:18:11 AM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

There's some good news and some bad news out of Toronto for our friend Scribbler...

Yeah, thanks A Canadian. I know Stacy and George are together. I confronted her about it, I said "what are you doing with him?!" and she said "who are you?" I didn't have a good answer for that.


All these reviews with screencaps are fantastic (well, most of them). I never saw Demon Seed either; I did get the paperback book at a used book store, so long ago I forget what I thought about it! Lipstick, now there's a movie I remember wanting to see and then completely forgot about! I wonder how many other old movies there are like that: movies in the 70s, 80s, I wanted to see then, didn't or couldn't for various reasons, and now might be out on DVD but I don't remember what they were (titles or anything)!

Now why did I write: well, most of them. Nothing against the reviews, it's just I don't understand movies where the male attacker gets completely naked, while the girl isn't stripped naked. Even if a male performer is in good shape, he's not the one I want to see naked! I suppose this is a pet-peeve of mine. The attacker should keep his clothes on, strip the girl, it's just common sense!

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 03:57:18 AM

Name: vintageaman
E-mail address:

Cool pic today! What movie is that from?

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 04:10:11 AM

Name: Insomniac
Homepage URL:

I know A Dangerous Method has been mentioned on the forum in the past, but just to give an update, it's looking more promising. Reviewers are saying Keira Knightley has nude scenes and scenes of being beaten, and at least one review makes it sound like there could be a nude bondage scene.

"The Pirates of the Caribbean star looked more likely to be attending a high tea then topless and strapped to a bed while being thrashed by her lover. However, that's the Keira viewers will be seeing in her latest, buzz-worthy film."

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 05:49:27 AM

Name: YikYakker

John Galt: Thanks for bringing back Lipstick, another intriguing piece of classic GIMPage. I saw this when it first came out in theaters and haven't viewed it since. But your review has given me incentive to do so.

There was quite of bit of controversy about this flick at the time it was being shown, on several levels:

~ the lengthy and brutal rape scene
~ Margaux Hemingway was a major celebrity; doing this scene put her career on the line
~ the inclusion of her younger sister as an underage rape victim
~ the legal issues raised by the storyline
~ the implied justification of vengeance, which would be revisited later in I Spit on Your Grave (1977).

Lipstick was not the first rape-revenge flick, but if I'm not mistaken, most of its predecessors were grindhouse/drive-in flicks with lesser-known actresses.


Scribbler wrote: I wonder how many other old movies there are like that: movies in the 70s, 80s, I wanted to see then, didn't or couldn't for various reasons, and now might be out on DVD but I don't remember what they were (titles or anything)!

Oh man, I'm thinking the same thing. It's a great feeling when some long lost (or forgotten) piece of GIMPage surfaces on this board. I wonder if anyone out there remembers the titles of any "mainstream" movies from that period that:

~ have good GIMP scenes
~ are not currently in our review database
~ should be in our review database


Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 10:41:59 AM

Name: DHT
Homepage URL:

Where is today's photo from?

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 11:00:15 AM

Name: John Galt

Scribbler: You and I, we are on the same page regarding nude rapists and non-nude rape victims. Pet peeve? Check. Common sense? Check.

* * * * *

YikYakker said: It's a great feeling when some long lost (or forgotten) piece of GIMPage surfaces on this board. I wonder if anyone out there remembers the titles of any "mainstream" movies from that period. . .

I'm doing my best, man. It is kind of annoying, though, that sometimes I can't find the movie easily (or, um, legally) available for anyone who might be interested in viewing it. If not for Synapse Films, for instance, those Christina Lindberg flicks would probably have been unavailable.

And yes, you'll notice I qualified my statement by saying Lipstick was the first rape-revenge flick I remember seeing. I lack the ambition to research the history of rape revenge movies to determine precedence. However, there is little question in my mind that it deserves primacy, insofar as "legitimate" movies go. I Spit on Your Grave will always rank (in my mind) as the foremost example of the genre, but I consider it a "cult" classic.

* * * * *

Well, here's an interesting item. I ran across this brief Ain't It Cool News review of Hick, which apparently just premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival. The reviewer mentioned scenes of rape and tied-to-a-bed bondage, but was disturbed by the fact that the 13-year-old protagonist is played by Chloe Grace Moretz, the *ahem* 14-year-old actress who looked so adorable playing Hit Girl in the exceptionally violent movie, Kick-Ass. That movie was criticized for featuring such a young actress in such a violent role. Hick is being criticized for featuring such a young actress in such a sexual role. According to the reviewer, the filmmakers go out of their way to have the character play up her budding sexuality that inevitably leads to her rape.

Well, at the risk of inviting knee-jerk emotional responses, this subject always elicits from me an eye-rolling sigh of resigned frustration. Age of consent issues remind me of just how repressed and backward Americans are when it comes to sexuality, and how conceited and arrogant Americans are to dictate a "standard" of morality that attempts to undo millennia of human behavior, not to mention human nature.

Historically, age of consent has been a movable target, based in no small measure on the power and wealth of the man involved, which should be imminently understandable to a national population that worships wealth, profitability and power over everything else. Older rich and/or powerful men have always been free to use and abuse young girls. But even among the peasants and what passed for middle classes, historically the age of consent settled around 12 or so. Probably that had a lot to do with a shorter life expectancy, meaning successful procreation had to happen quickly. When your life expectancy at birth is 30 years, you can't afford to wait too long if you also want to be able to raise your children.

Personally, I think 12 is too young, and I suspect the majority of forum readers would agree with that sentiment. But I will also say that no intelligent person can reasonably defend the proposition that there is one "magical" age at which every girl suddenly becomes a woman. I've known immature 20-somethings on the one end. And anyone who has ever seen one of Traci Lords' scandalous early movies would have a hard time arguing that she did not know exactly what she was doing (and had quite an enjoyable time doing it) when she was 15. (Watching those moves would also make you a pedophile in America, though. So if you don't want to be a pedophile, you will need to watch those movies in Europe. Or Asia. Or South America. Or Africa. Or, if you wait until the movies where she is 16, Canada and the UK. It's that easy to not be a pedophile.)

Jodie Foster was 14 when Taxi Driver was released (meaning she was very likely 13 while it was being filmed). Have you seen Jodie Foster in Taxi Driver? It would be hard to imagine a more Lolita-ish character. In fact, Sue Lyons was only 15 during the filming of Lolita. So for those who might be deeply disturbed about Hick, I think it is important to remember that it is a movie. Plus, Chloe Grace Moretz doesn't look like this any more. She looks like this. What a difference a few years can make.

I am kind of curious to see Hick for its GIMP appeal, plus, I like the actress. I intended to watch the US remake of Let the Right One In, starring Chloe Grace Moretz, but have not gotten around to it yet because the original was so exquisite and I don't like being disappointed by lousy remakes. (This should not be a surprise to regular readers of my remake rants.) First of all, they renamed it Let Me In, which completely changes the meaning of the phrase. Secondly--well, there is no second reason--that is actually enough to put me off right there.

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 12:52:27 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Thanks very much for the excellent review of Lipstick. It was back in April 2010 that we had a poll question regarding which is the best mainstream rape scene of all time, that or the original I Spit On Your Grave. The results were inconclusive, but I contend that based on the attractiveness of the victim (Margaux was a real-life supermodel at the time) and the fact that it's a bondage rape put it over the top in my book.

As a movie, it's not an A by any means, but if you're watching a movie to see a model getting raped, it delivers exactly what you're hoping for. Plus it contains one of the greatest single lines of dialogue in movie history: "He tried to kill me with his cock!" How can you not love a movie like that?

The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.


MaX CoXXX: Thanks for the reminder. I'll try to finish reading your screenplay this weekend. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to check it out in advance.


Today's daily picture: Sorry guys, I have no idea where it's from. I pick up stuff off the net all the time but only a small percentage of it is ever identified. I thought it was an artwork myself, as opposed to being from a movie. If anybody knows, please share that information here.


YikYakker wrote: I wonder if anyone out there remembers the titles of any "mainstream" movies from that period that:

~ have good GIMP scenes
~ are not currently in our review database
~ should be in our review database

Well, there's plenty that should be in the database. Some of the best were made back in the 1970s, when filmmakers had new-found freedom to show explicit nudity and rape on film for the first time, and before the next generation decided it was their goal to censor those same films. As a result, a lot of those titles are unavailable to the DVD generation, or if they are, they're either hard to find or else missing the scenes that made them great to begin with.

There are titles I would like to review but it seems less than worthwhile because few others will have a chance to check those titles out afterward. It was why I sat on reviewing Christina Lindberg's Japanese movie for so long, because the movie is largely unavailable. But the allure of Christina Lindberg Appreciation Week brought me out my shell. Anybody have a movie they'd like to see get an official GIMP review on the board?

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 03:34:48 PM

Name: James
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Gents - can anyone help me ID this scene? It says American Fighter, but I can't find anything on this anywhere. Much appreciated.

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 10:03:53 PM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: You're definitely back with a vengeance. Thanks once again for the review.

While I enjoyed the review and the caps, I'm left feeling a bit puzzled. For whatever reason, I don't seem to have the same fond memories that everyone else has about Lipstick. I didn't dislike it, but it's not a movie that I own. I guess I missed something.

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 10:21:24 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

James: The scene you're referring to is American Ninja 4: The Annihilation, featuring the late actress Robin Stille, and she has some good scenes. The best one is where she gets tied AOH and one of the bad guys opens up her top to expose her bra. When she objects, he proceeds to beat her up, landing several blows to her face. That'll teach her. Then they take her and several men outside and tie them to stakes. Unfortunately, they light the fire under one of the guys instead of her. One of the all time great BATS teases, but still worth checking out the movie if you can find it. It's on DVD.

Sunday, September 11th 2011 - 10:37:48 PM

Name: MaX CoXXX
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Ralphus, Looking forward to your feedback.

Good Hunting


Monday, September 12th 2011 - 12:47:51 AM

Name: Sloth

John Galt - now "Lipstick" is one I've seen - and that was a brutal rape scene for the time and certainly rates an A for content - my issue with it, and I know I'm going into heretical territory here, was casting - like Susan George in "Straw Dogs" did nothing for me (always thought that role should have gone to another English actress of that era, Joanna Pettet) Margaux Hemingway simply failed to float the boat - probably just another manifestation of my numerous personality flaws - thanks for the time and effort on that one.

Insomniac - concerning "A Dangerous Method" - I notice it's directed by David Cronenberg - never found him to be particularly Gimp friendly with the exception of the dungeon teasers in "Videodrome" but still we can hope - reading the article you provided I came away unsure whether Keira is the victim of or aggressor in this relationship - as I read it she is mentioned in a masochistic thing and also referred to as under treatment for fits of rage - we will have to monitor this one.

Stay well all

Monday, September 12th 2011 - 10:11:49 AM

Name: carnyx
E-mail address:

hi everyone- thank you so much to everyone who tried to help me find that comic book scene. especially covers who really went the extra mile. after looking at the suggestions it sounds like sally forth is the best candidate. i'll let you know what happens and again thank you for all your help. take care. robert

Monday, September 12th 2011 - 11:55:29 AM

Name: John Galt

So I was trying to recall some older movies that might have had good rape scenes, for review purposes. I decided to turn to The Internets for assistance. I was surprised when my Google search of "Top 10 rape movies" only turned up one useful hit. It was actually entitled "Top 10 Most Disturbing Rape Scenes," which is probably how I would title it as well on a, um, mainstream web site. (The others were variations on best movie sex scene, which might actually be a commentary on how interchangeable the two are in the subconscious minds of many people. I could do a whole digression here on the sick, Puritanical attitudes too many people have about sex in general that they would proclaim any sex scene a disgusting scene... but I won't.)

Anyway, the best hit turned out to be a blog at Rotten Tomatoes, complete with several of the obligatory I think ALL rape scenes are disturbing posts. Yes, yes: That's why you are reading the thread and commenting on it. I understand. You are SO disgusted. I am equally annoyed by hypocritical posters, but I read on anyway.

It turned out to be mostly a list of movies with rape scenes, not a list of the best (or, for those who haven't come to terms with their darker desires, most disgusting) rape scenes. Comments in the thread named Caligula, which had a fairly wicked rape scene, but it didn't do much for me, being more of a conceptually humiliating rape than a violent rape. A Clockwork Orange was mentioned, and I have to admit the Singing in the Rain rape was terrific as far as it went, but I'm not sure I would include it in a Top 10 List.

The original list at the top of the thread did not include I Spit On your Grave, by the way. Nor did it include Lipstick. Hmm. Obviously not compiled by a GIMPer. You can read the list (actually the entire thread) here.

Straw Dogs and Irreversible I get. I personally loved The Evil Dead rape by tree scene, but I would have to compile my list to see if it made the Top 10 cut-off. The others were movies I haven't seen or I saw and the rape scene apparently did not make an impression on me. So now I have some movies to check out, although I am not very hopeful I will be seeing anything great. Anyone who could list a scene from Moulin Rouge with Nicole Kidman (which was rated PG-13), but not list Dead Calm with Nicole Kidman, probably is not qualified to compile an authoritative list.

Collectively, though, I'll bet we are. It's a damn shame we don't have a mechanism that would allow for such a polling to take place. Of course, a great number of our forum membership don't actively participate that often, but a simple voting poll might have drawn some folks out.

I will be interested to see if anyone answers Ralphus' call to post any movies they would like to see reviewed.

Monday, September 12th 2011 - 02:49:14 PM

Name: YikYakker

I don't remember which day this pic was posted, but I did appreciate the fact that the two "superheroes" took Wonder Woman's boots off, and left theirs on.


Lots of comments about Lipstick...

A Canadian: For whatever reason, I don't seem to have the same fond memories that everyone else has about Lipstick.

While I liked the clothes-ripping and the tying to the bed, I did not like seeing Margaux's face smeared with lipstick. Maybe that's why I have not revisited this movie.

Oh well, at least she was not wearing shoes.

John Galt wrote'll notice I qualified my statement by saying Lipstick was the first rape-revenge flick I remember seeing.

Understood. An earlier one that comes to mind is Act of Vengeance AKA "Rape Squad" (1974), which has a standout scene that we've discussed on this board in the past.

BTW, the top 10 most disturbing rape scenes you uncovered was valuable for me as a reminder of rape scenes that I missed, such as the ones with Jodie Foster, Hilary Swank and Chloe Sevigny.

Even though I saw Leaving Las Vegas, I'm completely blanking on the gang rape of Elizabeth Shue. That's not something I'd easily forget...must be a case of creeping senility.

But Nicole Kidman in Moulin Rouge? Really?


I've just recently viewed a flick from the "good old days" (1977) that has a noteworthy rape scene. The English title is Confessions of the Sex Slaves and it is available, but at the price of your first-born child. I've got it on my list of movies to review, or at least to submit to the rape database, if it's not already included there.


John Galt wrote: If not for Synapse Films, for instance, those Christina Lindberg flicks would probably have been unavailable.

Your comments, and those of Ralphus, about the dilemma of reviewing films that are unavailable to those who might be interested, pose a question that I have often wrestled with. I hate to write about a movie that no one is able to see. At the same time, some are such outstanding examples of what we like that I feel they should not go unmentioned.

But if Synapse is committed to bringing these kinds of films back, perhaps I should amend my previously posted question, as follows:

~ Are there any movies available from Synapse that our review database includes?
~ Are there any movies available from Synapse that our review database does not include, but should?
~ Are there any movies that we should beg Synapse to restore (uncensored) so that we can review them and refer our readers to the company as a source?

Monday, September 12th 2011 - 10:01:48 PM

Name: MrAnthony

@YikYakker: Look at her feet: toes pointed, just like if she were wearing heels. This image would not look as good, if her feet were flat.

Tuesday, September 13th 2011 - 12:52:23 AM

Name: Renzo Novatore

Hey I have a request...does anyone know of any "Attackers" films with good whipping scenes?

Tuesday, September 13th 2011 - 03:41:26 AM

Name: tony
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

New damsel bondage films released courtesy of BlackFox Bound check out the link above.

Tuesday, September 13th 2011 - 01:55:28 PM

Name: Bill K.

Ralphus who created your above terrific pic of the day? And I believe it is a natural body reaction for the feet to point down ward when hanging especially if there is a pipe impaling her butt hole as the pic imply as she is being finger raped. Let me guess she was caught texting while driving, right?

Bill K.

Tuesday, September 13th 2011 - 02:18:41 PM

Name: A Canadian

Renzo Novatore wrote:

Does anyone know of any "Attackers" films with good whipping scenes?

A couple of films come to mind. The whipping scenes in Goddess of Hell (Attackers JBD-103) are pretty good. Some of the whippings in Attackers JBD-077 are pretty good, too. I have reviews of both movies in the Reviews section if you want more details.

Generally, your best bet is the JBD series of films, and I would recommend looking for older titles.


John Galt: At the risk of sounding homophobic, I can't endorse a rape list that puts the Ned Beatty violation from Deliverance at No. 1.

Tuesday, September 13th 2011 - 06:26:55 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

John Galt: Thanks for the link to the rape scenes discussion page. You're right, a lot of posters there pretending to be upset by certain rape scenes when in actuality they were probably turned on by them but were too embarrassed to admit it on a public site. That's why I'm glad we have this forum because we don't have to be politically correct here.

I like watching women get raped. There, I said it. How cathartic! I like seeing 'em tortured, too.

Anyway, I looked at their lists of rape scenes and was dismayed to discover I've seen nearly all of them. Well, there were a few on there that I wasn't familiar with, such as Man Bites Dog, Blindness, Insanitarium and Bobby Z. Don't know anything about them, but there's rape so I'll take a chance. Those were the few that Netflix actually carried, despite their content. But there were a whole lot more that are on DVD but Netflix is still playing the same game where they list it as "DVD availability date unknown". Give me a break. Netflix, why don't you just admit that you're censoring bastards just like Blockbuster Video used to be?


YikYakker: Confessions of the Sex Slaves? Never heard of that one, and not in the Rape Database. I looked it up on the IMDB and it stars a couple of actresses who worked with Jess Franco, but it's not a Franco film. What can you tell us about it?


Renzo Novatore: What Attackers films have good whipping scenes? Pretty much anything with Randa Mai as the villain are worthwhile. A few that come to mind immediately are Attackers JB-79, JB-92 and JB-111. There are full reviews and a buy link for each in the Reviews section.


Bill K: Regarding today's daily picture, sorry, Artist Unknown. Like I mentioned earlier, I often don't know who creates the pictures I put up there; I usually just find them on the net.

Caught while texting and driving? Yep, that works for me. Any reason will do. Driving while being an attractive woman? Guilty! Throw the book at her. Her punishment is 10 years of forced servitude. Ahem, I'll take care of this prisoner myself, ladies.

Tuesday, September 13th 2011 - 07:20:11 PM

Name: YikYakker

Ralphus: I've only skimmed through Confessions of the Sex Slaves but I think it may be a good candidate for a review. It's done in "mock-umentary" style, complete with breathless opening narration about the "serious issue" of sexual slavery. It purports to tell the "true stories" of 5 women who fell victim to the trade. Of course, it's really just an excuse to show lots of nudity, rape and degradation - but I'm not complaining.

In the rape scene I mentioned, two guys enter a woman's apartment and immediately begin to molest her. They rip off her clothes, put her on the couch and one of the guys begins humping her vigorously. This is a very lengthy scene and the dude seems to have inexhaustible energy. Then the second guy gets his turn, although we don't see as much of that. Afterwards, they shoot her up with a drug and stuff the unconscious girl in a suitcase (really, this is amazing), with the implication that she will be delivered to her new owner in that fashion. These mugs really enjoyed their work. I watched this scene in its entirety, but don't have a lot of details on the rest of the movie...yet. It's a loaner, so I've got to work fast.


MrAnthony wrote: Look at her feet: toes pointed, just like if she were wearing heels. This image would not look as good, if her feet were flat.

You're absolutely right. And I think the little wiggle in the toes is a nice touch too.

I can understand why some productions would put an actress tied AOH in high heels - besides keeping her feet clean, it's a way of giving the performer additional weight support without sacrificing the aesthetics of the pointed-toe look. Good for the actress, good for those who like to see the heels.

My suggestions are: if it's too stressful to have a barefooted AOH actress on tiptoes for a lengthy period of time, give her a break by letting her stand flatfooted but take the camera off her feet. And keep the floor clean.

But hey, we have producers and actresses out there...maybe they can share some insights about this topic. Love to hear from you.


My "movies to research" list includes one called Anger (1988) aka Terror in a Women's Prison aka Le Camp de la Terreur aka Angels with Golden Guns aka Virgin Apocalypse. (whew!)

Is there anyone out there who has seen this and would care to comment on/review it?

Tuesday, September 13th 2011 - 08:58:22 PM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: Man Bites Dog was a thoroughly unexciting rape with a less-than-attractive victim. Actually, it was a thoroughly unexciting film, period. No reason why the brief rape scene should be any better than the rest.

* * * * *

A Canadian: I do not consider myself homophobic, although there are things I like to watch and there are things I don't like to watch. Man-on-man rape is not something I care to watch. Truthfully, man-on-man kissing is also something I don't like, and I ended up fast-forwarding through almost an entire episode of the latest Torchwood season because it was a lengthy flashback of a love affair between the male protagonist and another guy. I don't feel like homosexuality is wrong or unhealthy or perverse, but watching it just is not my idea of entertainment.

But in all honesty, if I were listing the Top 10 Disturbing Rape Scenes, the list would probably consist of all man-on-man rape scenes. Because, in no uncertain terms, I do find them disturbing, as well as un-entertaining. However, I would have a hard time completing that list because if I am forewarned that's what happens, chances are good I won't watch the show. I have never seen Deliverance, for example. In fact, I am having a hard time calling to mind a single movie I've seen with male rape in it.

What I was looking for, of course, was the Top 10 Best Rape Scenes, so I had to filter the results. I still found a few titles to check out.

I also found a thread at that went on for 33 pages. By the end of the thread (yes, I read through the entire thing), I was very annoyed at the sanctimonious hypocrites and the idiotic arguments ("rape is worse than murder"). I also noticed that the originator of the thread was banned, and the thread was closed by supercilious sanctimonious self-important "Super Moderator," who posted: I think this thread has outlived its usefulness. What a dickhead. It started in 2007 and ran though 2010 with current comments. I would say that was a successful topic.

But then again, I am fairly judgmental myself when I think about a website that thrives on murder, death, destruction, torture, dismemberment, decapitation, flesh-eating, and many more fatal examples of man's inhumanity toward his fellow man self-righteously drawing some moral or ethical line at rape. Really, people? Really? You just pegged my Hypocrisy Meter. And you, Super Moderator Mr Caustic Coffee, are a conceited and egotistical house blend with delusions of Starbucks.

Some people just get my goat.

Tuesday, September 13th 2011 - 09:36:05 PM

Name: DHT

Today's pic looks like Stacy Burke.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 12:20:55 AM

Name: Bill K.

Here is a new found 3D art peril site posted at Pulptoon tonight: that GIMPers may or may not know about.

Bill K.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 12:27:56 AM

Name: Akhenaton

for YikYakker

About Anger ( you can find notices and caps here:

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 02:09:28 AM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

Ralphus: Netflix, why don't you just admit that you're censoring bastards just like Blockbuster Video used to be?

Pet peeve time! Netflix is not "censoring". They are not telling anyone what they can and cannot watch. They are selecting which movies they offer, and as a BUSINESS, have the right to select the movies they think people will want to rent. GRRRRR!

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 10:17:22 AM

Name: YikYakker

Akhenaton: Thanks for the tip on Good lord - this site seems to have been custom-made to suit my tastes: Nunsploitation, Pinky Violence, Rape & Revenge, Vampire and Women in Prison films.

I'll have a good time doing "research" there.


It's common to think of censorship as a government activity. However, Wikipedia posits this definition of the term:

Censorship is the suppression of speech or other public communication which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient to the general body of people as determined by a government, media outlet, or other controlling body.

Now, I'm going to defer to the legal eagles out there about this definition, but here's my understanding of censorship.

There are two kinds of censorship:

1) government censorship, which is allegedly unconstitutional here in the U.S., per the First Amendment, but which may include public institutions such as school districts, publicly-funded libraries, and of course, state, local and federal governments;
2) private censorship, which is practiced by such entities as textbook publishers, (non-public) library associations, religious authorities (like my Catholic school), and media outlets (as noted above), including radio, TV, print media and media distributors, e.g., Netflix and Blockbuster.

In democracies, conceptually, censorship of the first type can be legally, but sometimes fruitlessly, challenged.

However, censorship of the second type occurs all the time; finding legal grounds to challenge it is tricky. Conceptually, the issue of private censorship tends to be left to the "marketplace of ideas."

All of this is to say that even if private censorship is not explicitly illegal, it can still be controlling and reprehensible under certain circumstances. The Constitution provides a tremendous amount of leeway to media outlets (freedom of the press) and theocratic authorities (freedom of religion). They have the opportunity to disseminate as well as suppress information, ideas and images.

The opportunity for suppression is like an unlocked, parked car with the keys in the ignition - the virtuous bypasser is untempted, but the car thief is giddy.

Ok, off my soapbox and back to work.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 01:34:39 PM

Name: John Galt

jhlipton: I am not disagreeing with your definition of censoring, but what term would you use for businesses that control peoples' access to certain things due to market conditions that grant them close to a monopoly, and therefore give them the power to control what people see?

Let's use Wal-Mart as an example. The company has massive clout with its suppliers--so much so that if Wal-Mart decides it doesn't like something (let's say, Sheryl Crow's self-titled album that contained a lyric saying that Wal-Mart sold guns), then they can arbitrarily withhold distribution through their outlets. However, since the spreading cancer of Wal-Mart stores has effectively destroyed competition in many small communities across the nation, they, in effect, control what many people have ready access to. And at the risk of insulting rural America as a whole, my feeling is that many of those people are unsophisticated, if not, well, simple people, whose worldview can easily be skewed by limited access to information. And a population of misinformed or underinformed people does not bode well for a democracy.

I'm not sure I understand what business decision would lead a video distribution company to not provide the widest possible selection of videos to its customers. I dispute your contention that it is a "business" decision at all, and suggest it is instead a decision based on someone's "moral," ethical," or "personal" feelings, which they are in a position to force onto their customers. But I cannot dispute any company's prerogative to arbitrarily decide what their customers will see. At that point it is up to discerning consumers to boycot that business in favor of one more interested in providing a better selection.

As long as you pay Netflix for poor service, Ralphus, you will increase their market share and fail to support potential competitors who may fall by the wayside. That is the sad truth.

But, jhlipton, what term would you use to describe the de facto censorship exercised by businesses instead of the word censoring, so that we may avoid pet peeving you in the future?

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 01:39:45 PM

Name: DHT

Netflix is not a monopoly, but that isn't even the point. A company like Netflix's CARRYING a movie is not the same as their "granting access" to it. They have to gain "access" to the movie from its distributors just like everyone else. And anyone else can "gain access" to that same movie from that same distributor or any number of other sources, especially today on line. Can you do it as cheaply as you can from Netflix? No, and that's not their problem.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 05:36:09 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

jhlipton: Fine, we'll use your term for Netflix's business practices. It's their "business decision" to be...censoring bastards. It's their "business decision" to openly lie on their site about titles they refuse to carry by claiming they are not on DVD, when in fact they are. I have 23 movies in my Netflix queue that are listed as "DVD availability date unknown". If one was complacent and simply believed Netflix's claim, he or she would probably assume these movies really never had been released. Except I checked around and found that they are available elsewhere. Netflix is the number one video rental source in the United States, don't you think they owe their customers some honesty? I would have more respect for them if they just came out and said they won't carry these titles because of the content, instead of lying about it.

You can call it a "business decision", but is it a smart business decision to deny a percentage of their customers access to certain titles simply because the company doesn't, for whatever reason, like the content? Cult titles like the Ilsa movies, which Netflix used to carry but no longer does, are cult movies for a reason, because people like to watch them again and again. They're not for everyone, obviously, but why deny your customers that choice? Call it what you want, but I call it censorship.

Here's a quote from an article that John Galt linked on the forum a couple of weeks ago. It's an interview with Jerry Chandler, who runs Synapse Films:

Another huge obstacle are companies like Netflix and Amazon. We all know what Blockbuster did, cleaning out the mom and pop shops and replacing them with Blockbusters, then basically censoring, in my opinion, what you can rent. Netflix would handle just about anything, until they knocked Blockbuster off the top. Then, they started behaving just like Blockbuster. We are seeing the same thing with Amazon. In the past, we have seen at least 7 titles removed from Amazon because they MIGHT be too sexy.

I'm glad he said that because I thought maybe I was the only one who noticed how I could no longer rent certain GIMP films at Netflix like I used to. A lot of us don't make much money and can't afford to plop down $20-25 every time we see a title we'd like to check out. For us, it's less expensive and more convenient to simply rent them from the largest video library in cyberspace. I like Greencine, but honestly, they don't have Netflix's selection. So I've reluctantly stuck with Netflix. I guess I'm part of the problem. But I don't like them deciding what I can and cannot rent simply because of their moral practice of refusing to order certain films that they may deem offensive. We deserve better.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 06:07:45 PM

Name: YikYakker

Ralphus wrote:

...I thought maybe I was the only one who noticed how I could no longer rent certain GIMP films at Netflix like I used to.

Oh no, you are not alone my friend. I've had the same experience on the streaming side, which has been even more restricted. This after Netflix urged me to "use the streaming option and save money!"

And the worst part is when they condescend to make suggestions for you. "Ilsa is not available, but you might also like Heidi." After all, both of them are blondes who speak German. (I'm exaggerating of course, but I have gotten some weird, incongruent recommendations) .


DHT wrote:

Netflix is not "censoring". They are not telling anyone what they can and cannot watch.

In a strictly legal sense you are correct - there is no use of force involved. But again I would say that this definition of censorship as armed dictatorship is too narrow.

Retailers (like Netflix) can certainly manipulate and restrict your choices as befits their business "decisions". Their "right" to do so is not the issue here - no one here is advocating that they be jailed, fined or executed. That's what government censorship is about.

But the essence of the problem is that these decisions are not necessarily market-based, and they most certainly are not consumer-based. A good analogy is what has happened in the radio business:

In the late 1970s, heavy metal music became very popular. But radio stations who claimed to play "popular" music did not want to play heavy metal. Why? Because their sponsors (advertisers) didn't want to be associated with it. Radio stations began to announce that they played "NO HEAVY METAL." Not because it wasn't popular with consumers - it just wasn't popular with their sponsors. Same thing happened when rap music became popular in the 1980s. "All the hits you want to hear and no rap music!" was their slogan. Huh? That's censorship, not consumer service.

OK, so we concede that in the radio world, it's the sponsors who call the shots, not the audience. So why pretend otherwise? That's hypocrisy.

Who's calling the shots for Netflix? It's not the customers.


Let's face it - we are a niche market. Just as 1970s radio decided it would rather cater to squealing 15-year-old girls than screaming 15-year-old head-bangers, the "marketplace" is squeezing us out.

"But if this be treason, let's make the most of it!" (I think it was Patrick Henry who said that - someone please correct me if I'm mistaken).

What I mean is - if we're going to be snubbed by the big boys, we should put our money and support behind those who are willing to take a chance and give us what we want and need. Folks like Synapse and Red Feline and anyone else you can think of.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 08:09:18 PM

Name: YikYakker

Oops. Sorry guys, I meant to attribute that quote to jhlipton in my previous post, not DHT.

But while I'm at it:

DHT wrote:

A company like Netflix's CARRYING a movie is not the same as their "granting access" to it.

Well, it's going to take a while for my feeble brain to grasp exactly what that means. Surely it would be as confusing to many customers as it is to me.

Anyone think maybe Netflix would deign to explain it to their subscribers?

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 08:19:31 PM

Name: DHT

YikYakker: What I mean is, say there is a kind of wine that you can only get from the vineyard that makes it and a few scattered shops, unless Wal-Mart carried it too. But Wal-Mart doesn't want to. Okay, fine, that doesn't mean that Wal-Mart is denying you access to that wine, because you can order it from the vineyard or find it on Craig's list or Ebay or go through the trouble of finding one of the little local shops. Wal-Mart is not stopping you from doing that. They do not have any exclusive rights to that wine that means that they can decide who gets to buy it. They just don't want to carry it and sell it.

My whole issue being with John Galt's use of the phrase "controls access". It's misleading, and assigns to Netflix a preponderance and an obligation that they do not have.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 10:00:48 PM

Name: mothbrad

I'm another fan of today's picture - thanks, Ralphus.

Regarding censorship, this really worries me, because it makes me wonder if there is some behind the scenes 'encouragement' by the powers-that-be to make Netflix change which films are available. One of the big flaws in capitalism is that once a company gets big enough, it can treat consumers like idiots, and there's no threat to the business. I hope this isn't a harbinger of something worse.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 10:26:51 PM

Name: John Galt

DHT said: My whole issue being with John Galt's use of the phrase "controls access". It's misleading, and assigns to Netflix a preponderance and an obligation that they do not have.

What I actually said, was: But I cannot dispute any company's prerogative to arbitrarily decide what their customers will see. At that point it is up to discerning consumers to boycott that business in favor of one more interested in providing a better selection. I'm not sure I could have stated any clearer that I don't assign Netflix any obligation to do anything at all. [Except I misspelled boycott the first time.]

I was also very careful in my use of the phrase close to a monopoly specifically to avoid someone obfuscating my point by claiming I said Netflix was a monopoly. But I am curious. If you could name me the top five companies that go head-to-head with Netflix on a national scale and insure alternative access to sizable libraries of movies so that anyone can access anything they might want that Netflix has banned, I would appreciate it. I can't do that, any more than I can name you someone who directly competes with Amazon.

I really am under the impression that Netflix makes its deals with distributors (who have entire libraries of films or TV shows) that involve some degree of exclusivity in order to preclude competition. With exclusive rights to an entire library, any movies in that library that Netflix chooses not to make available are, essentially, unavailable to anyone else. That's the way film libraries have historically been marketed, and I think that is still business as usual.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 11:07:56 PM

Name: James
E-mail address:

Much appreciated. Thanks, Ralphus.

Wednesday, September 14th 2011 - 11:20:22 PM

Name: MrAnthony

But I am curious. If you could name me the top five companies that go head-to-head with Netflix on a national scale and insure alternative access to sizable libraries of movies so that anyone can access anything they might want that Netflix has banned, I would appreciate it. I can't do that, any more than I can name you someone who directly competes with Amazon.

It's the 21st Century and digital uploading/streaming has changed everything. Quite frankly, if Netflix, Blockbuster, or Amazon won't make it available, it can be digitized and found elsewhere. The demand is there; if they won't meet the need, someone else will. Private companies can do what they want; it's not government censorship. When a government bans movies or books, that's real censorship. Private companies block stuff all the time; see what happens if you try a tagged porn site at the office, for example. Those sites are often blocked on office computers. If Netflix won't make a movie available, that's their loss of revenue.

Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 12:27:57 AM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

I'm guessing Netflix buys DVD movies in bulk from distributors or direct from studios, even the cult ones. If Ilsa (for example) is not available anymore from these sources, and the limited amount of the DVDs they had on hand have bit the dust over time (DVDs do break, become unplayable, etc.), I don't think they're going to try and hunt them down at the few video stores that still have them for $120 for one DVD. Now they could find them cheaper used, but that's also probably not high on their list.

Plus they need the shelf space for the thousand or so of Harry Potter DVDs they have coming in soon.

Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 01:41:57 AM

Name: John Galt

Mr Anthony: Touche, sir. I was really thinking of legal alternatives, though. The websites you named also work to the detriment of legitimate producers. Especially the ones, like Synapse Films, who track down high-quality surviving prints and work them over to restore them. I think it is unfair to them to go all pirate and deprive them of their profits because your chosen provider won't distribute them. You are punishing the wrong folks, aren't you?

* * * * *

Scribbler: Wouldn't you really only need a single original DVD in order to create a digital copy for virtually unlimited streaming purposes? DVDs do break down and wear out, but a wise business model would dictate keeping digital back-ups that could be recopied to server farms as necessary. Unlike making a paper copy of a paper copy, I don't think copying a file degrades its quality. I haven't thought about it before, but I don't see how it would. As Mr Anthony said, digital uploading and streaming has changed everything, especially in terms of archiving old movies. I'm not so sure it's about buying up surviving copies for mailing so much as its about licensing rights for streaming.

Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 04:55:02 AM

Name: MrAnthony

Actually, I think John Galt and Scribbler are both correct. No doubt Netflix has a problem with cult DVDs disappearing over time, either from people not returning them or from normal wear and tear. So, some movies would disappear from the normal queue of DVD delivery, especially cult films that had limited DVD runs. I had this problem with LaserDisc actually; it took me years to find the Perils of Gwendoline on LaserDisc and I never did find Barbarian Queen on LaserDisc, even though it was listed in catalogues.

As for streaming, that's a relatively recent development and it would require two things: 1) licensing agreements and 2) source material. Ever try to find a video company that's gone out of business? They may hold the rights and you can't find them to get the agreement. Or if they're around, they may not want streaming (especially for a cult film) on the theory that eventually, they'll do it themselves. And if your source material has essentially disappeared from wear/tear/theft/non-returns over time, how are you going to rip it. In the VHS days, there were things I could never find, even checking overseas.

And John Galt: of course I would never encourage theft, and the list I provided was more to make a point--that the digital world has changed distribution models and companies had better recognize it or suffer the consequences. So, while I don't agree that Netflix not carrying something is censorship, I do think that their failure to carry something could (and should) have consequences, including forcing people (because of demand) to seek out sites like those I listed. People should, and do try to behave responsibly, but at the same time they will do what they can to meet what they perceive as a need.

Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 08:43:07 AM

Name: Sloth
Homepage URL:

So yesterday I'm visiting our friend Hank Hobbs place and what should I find but some caps from a flick titled "Imps" - some Gimpers may remember Lynda Wiesmeier from the incredibly god-awful "Evil Town" as the chick running topless through the woods before she is abducted, bound, gagged and then played with by the two goober service station guys - from the movie description I doubt I would ever view this but I do have a question - is she being menaced by an orange pinata? - no, anything but that!

Normally I would chime in on our latest censoring debate but I will decline this time around - my views are so "conspiratorial" in nature I'm not certain I buy them myself.

Picked up this little item at the above link - seems to have an interesting premise and as a short perhaps it has limited dead time - give a heads up after viewing.

Stay well all

Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 09:13:14 AM

Name: Mwb

After reading all this about censorship, I will add to it.

As a long time member of Insex and now RTB, I can tell you PD is censored by CC bill.

If you watch a RTB live feed, you may see things that remind of Insex. But if you download a RTB article, you won't see it. They are on him like flies on shit.

I wonder if these other video providers have the same problem?

New morals might come in to play with videos.

I remember seeing "Mark of the Devil 2" at the drive in. If any of you have seen the version shown now, did you ever wonder why the torturer let her see her son? In the uncut version I saw, she let herself be tied up and raped by him.

Just my thoughts on this.


Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 10:29:27 AM

Name: MaX CoXXX
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:


You are discussing the very root of a lot of problems in society today. What we are seeing is 100% censorship. They (leave that "they" open to your personal favorite conspiracy) have not been able to legislate the censorship "they" want. So "they" have found a convenient way to censor. It's fascism, "A blurring of the lines between government & corporations". Plain & simple.The corporations like Visa are censoring America with their TOS.

I don't see it getting any better any time soon. Getting money out of politics is where it has to start & that's going to take millions in the streets demanding it.

I guess the instant gratification of the internet was not meant for us. So we go old school, mail in checks & money orders to producers willing to produce & distributors willing to distribute & receive your download link or DVD. Fuck Visa, Netflix & the rest of those Fascists pigs.

Good Hunting


Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 07:16:24 PM

Name: YikYakker

I've been bashing Netflix, but they did offer up a moldy oldie drive-in special called Angel's Wild Women (1972) AKA Commune of Death AKA Rough Riders AKA Screaming Eagles. Out of curiosity I watched the first 15 minutes on streaming.

A few guys chase down a girl through an isolated pasture, tear off her clothes, and proceed to gang-rape her. However, the party is interrupted by the girl's friends, a gang of kick-ass biker chicks who, well, kick ass. Yeah, they beat the snot out of these guys.

From the movie reviews, it seems like things go downhill from there. One critic described it as "a rape sequence, some fighting, some nudity, more fighting, some more nudity, more fights and a couple more fights thrown in for good measure."

So whattya think, guys? Should I bother watching the rest of this? (I'll probably have to do it fast, before the movie suddenly becomes "unavailable."


Speaking of moralists (as we often do): Seems the LPGA is upset about the outfit that Olivia Munn wore during a golf tournament.

I dunno, I think she looks cool. But I may be biased, because raven-haired Olivia ranks near the top of my list of candidates for the position of my "future ex-wife." I do think she needs to change her footwear.

But more to the point, if the LPGA wants to punish Olivia for her sins, I have a basement-cum-dungeon that's just loaded with devices of torment.

Anyone know someone at the LPGA I can talk to?

Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 08:18:35 PM

Name: YikYakker

Today's Pic: Damn, I wish I knew how to tie rope like that.

Thursday, September 15th 2011 - 09:23:10 PM

Name: John Galt

YikYakker: MMmmm, Olivia Munn. Certainly one of my current fantasies. I am still anxiously awaiting her first nude scene. How much better would it be if it was a nude bondage scene? *sigh*

But on the plus side of nude pics, there are now a couple of nude pics of Scarlett Johansson on the Internet. She took some revealing photos of herself and someone hacked her cell phone. Sadly, she wasn't tied up or anything.

Reportedly, the FBI is on the case. Oh my gosh, I just flashed back to grade school and thought to myself, FBI = Female Body Inspectors. One of these days I'm really gonna have to grow up.... Anyway, until they get a cease-and-desist order, you can see them here.

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 04:42:59 AM

Name: Cover

Thanks for the link, John. I'd heard about the photos, but of course the news media never provides a link that actually lets one see the cause of their endless prattling.

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 07:43:58 AM

Name: Sloth
Homepage URL:

Ralphus - today's pic is what artwork should be - beautiful.

YikYakker - man, I dunno - after that first sequence in "Angel's Wild Woman" I think we know who the aggressors will be - a bunch of bad ass biker chicks kicking ass and taking names - doesn't sound too promising from the Gimp perspective does it.

Mwb - I too saw "Mark of the Devil 2" at the drive-in circa 1975 but I must have viewed a chopped version as there was no Erica Blanc bondage/rape scene - you are a lucky man - so please do tell, was it well staged? - have never found a copy that has that scene included.

And now, as a public service to Gimpers worldwide, it's time for a movie review - today we will examine a short, 20 minute run time, from the good old UK - The Dark Room by Alexander Holt and Lance Roehrig.

We have a hip young photographer who uses his dark room for multiple purposes. In the bowels of his stylish pad he has his previous chickliwick chair tied with some sort of metallic device stuffed in her pie hole. He has a monitor there where he can view callers at the door and she sees him arriving with his latest squeeze.

The new girlfriend is doing some yard work and finds what appears to be a hip bone in the garden. Inside she begins to prep dinner and hears odd noises from downstairs and goes to investigate but he interrupts her and heads down himself. Seems the ex had managed to tip her chair over and was using her metal mouthpiece to tap on the plumbing. He sedates her with an injection, cuts her loose from the chair and duct tapes her hands together in front. She taunts him and we learn he cannot function sexually with a woman unless he is inflicting pain. He then takes a series of photos as she squirms on the floor.

She manages to bite him. Now enraged, he applies a clamp to her tongue and reaches for his trusty pruning shears - a tongue snipping and voile, she shuts up. He heads upstairs and new girl notices stains on his sweater which he says are chemicals from the dark room. She sends him out on a honey-do and she goes downstairs to investigate.

There she discovers numerous photos of his previous captives before locating the ex who developed something of a speech impediment. They look at the monitor and see him return. He pursues them and knocks them unconscious. When they awake the newest chick is strapped face down on a gurney while ex is bound on the floor. He preps for a photo shoot.

He cuts the tendon behind the knee of the strapped down chick and discovers the other got loose and disappeared. As he searches for her she attacks him and the screen goes blank.

We cut scene to an art exhibit at a museum. Our villain enters and begins to chat with his latest conquest. The End

Movie Pluses - this was not done by some bunch of stoners who got together for the weekend and decided they could make a movie - all aspects of the filming are first rate from camera to sound to setting to acting - as is the premise, a charming handsome nutcase who takes photos of his captives.

Movie Minuses - the girls remain clothed - bummer - being a short the sequences are crammed together so the tortures are abbreviated - obviously, there will be blood but not overly so, no splatter fest here so that might actually be a plus.

The Verdict - these guys came oh so close to going full blown Gimp but seemed to have backed off at the last second.

My Grade C+

Stay well all

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 10:22:18 AM

Name: John Galt

Well, so the remake of Straw Dogs is out today. I was reminded of that as I perused the Ain't It Cool News web site and saw two reviews. Aside from the typically arrogant and pretentious crap that Harry Knowles passes off as criticism, there was another one by Capone that eviscerated the movie in a well-thought-out and meaningful review that kind of affirmed my initial fears about anyone remaking the Peckinpah classic. Most annoyingly of all, though, neither one of them described the rape scene or rated it in terms of nudity, violence, or GIMP. I wasn't expecting that, of course, but I am looking forward to some GIMPer seeing it and giving us the GIMP 411. Apparently Kate Bosworth goes braless a lot, if that is any enticement.

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 12:03:01 PM

Name: JoeX

John Galt, thanks very much for the link. It may technically be off-topic, but no one in their right mind would care.

Joe X

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 02:12:41 PM

Name: A Canadian

Sloth: Thanks for the review of The Dark Room. I've never heard of it but I don't get the sense I was missing anything.


The Straw Dogs remake: Based on the reviews I have read, I sense it will be a letdown. Apparently, it's not much of a film, and none of the reviews suggested there was anything sexually shocking in the movie. I could be wrong but the vibes so far aren't reassuring.

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 05:51:23 PM

Name: John Galt

Okay, well, according to the Upcoming Nude Scenes web site, there is no female nudity from Kate Bosworth or anyone else in Straw Dogs. I would have expected that at the very least, even if the rape scene sucked. So, that would be a Massive Fail.

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 07:29:14 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

Well, I took one for the team and attended the premiere showing of Straw Dogs tonight. At the same time that John was reporting there was no nudity from Kate Bosworth, I was leaving the theatre after witnessing it myself. As mentioned before, I'm a big fan of the Sam Peckinpah original, made 40 years earlier. I had guardedly high hopes for the remake, especially with the new attractive females they had cast. But I have to say, it was a miss all the way around.

In the 1971 film, there's a scene where Susan George's character goes to the window and takes off her top at the leering men out on the roof. In the remake, Kate Bosworth does the same, except they edited it so that no skin was shown. It was a major cheat, and once I saw that, I knew we were in big trouble.

The much ballyhooed and explicit rape scene in the original was badly sanitized in the remake. Kate Bosworth is wearing a tee shirt throughout. It was quickly edited with rapid-fire cutting, and while there was no doubt that it was a real rape this time (the original made it somewhat ambiguous), there was really no shock, no tension, and obviously, no eye candy for the viewer. It honestly could have been a made for TV movie.

They even screwed up the later strangulation scene with Willa Holland. Willa was adorable, very cute and fresh-faced, and she gets hand gagged and lifted up off the air by the retarded guy. But we don't even see the aftermath of what happens to her. Did she strangle? Did she suffocate? Did she even die at all? We don't know because the filmmakers didn't even care enough to finish her scene; they just cut away and we never find out.

That's really the main problem with the movie. Maybe someone who never saw the original might think more of it, but to me there was a sense of familiarity and no real surprises, and therefore, no real suspense. The Peckinpah film had a real aura of menace throughout, and honestly, the nudity really was important to the plot. The remake is...well, it's just a pale imitation with a good looking cast and little else. It made me really sad to realize that the golden age of exploitation is over. They officially just don't make explicit rape films in Hollywood anymore.

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 09:59:09 PM

Name: A Canadian

Ralphus: Thanks for the official confirmation on Straw Dogs. I'm not surprised but it does make you wonder who the audience is for these lame-ass remakes. Maybe Hollywood will soon find a way to produce a family-friendly remake of A Clockwork Orange.

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 10:24:18 PM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: Thank you and I feel your pain for having suffered the disappointment of the Straw Dogs remake. Naturally no one was going to report on the rape scene with the detail we GIMPers crave, so your sacrifice was not in vain.

* * * * *

Sloth: Thanks for reviewing The Dark Room. It doesn't really sound like my cup of tea, but the description might have sucked me in. No nudity? I just don't understand these sex-crazed sociopaths who don't strip their victims naked. I'm beginning to think... there might be something wrong with them. Plus I'm not the torture porn aficionado and blood and gore don't add anything for me. But, like I said, I might have wasted time on it based on the description alone, so you saved me the disappointment.

* * * * *

Cover and Joe X: You're welcome. I knew the Scarlett Johansson thing wasn't even remotely GIMP but I figured we might have some interested folks. And it is so annoying to read all those damn articles that don't show the pictures or at least link to them.

Friday, September 16th 2011 - 10:52:19 PM

Name: Vince

Ralphus, Thanks for enduring the remake of "Straw Dogs" for us.

I knew there wasn't going to be any explicit long running rape scene. That's the trend in Hollywood these days. I guess Hollywood realizes that women buy movie tickets too and they don't want to alienate the female audience. Instead they make chick flick junk like "I Don't Know How She Does It".

I live in New York so what's also depressing is that, for this market there hasn't even been a foreign film released recently with scenes of involuntary intercourse.

Kind of sad to think that the good old days of sexploitation in not only mainstream but indie film is gone.

But I'll try to remain hopeful. Maybe next year there will be a remake of "Act of Vengeance" with Cameron Diaz wearing those Daisy Dukes she wore in "Bad Teacher" and we'll get to hear her sing "Jingle Bells".

Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 01:58:23 AM

Name: MAV
Homepage URL:

Hey GIMPers,

I caught a short part of Minka Kelly's upcoming AOH GIMP scene in Charlie's Angels this week and posted it on my youtube channel. Since it was short I looped it and added some music. From her reaction and bloody lip, looks like she'll be tortured a bit >;)

Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 06:09:45 AM

Name: Mwb

Now I'm wondering if it was Mark of the Devil 2.

I know for sure it was the same huge torturer.

He had her tied AOH. Her legs were chained to huge blocks. He picked up a block and moved it a couple feet. Then he did the same to the other block.

I remember that like it was yesterday.


Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 07:49:13 AM

Name: John Galt

Mwb: That happened to a bald nun about 40 minutes into the movie. She was tied arms apart AOH and round (apparently heavy) metal balls were chained to her feet. He moved them apart to spread her legs and raped her. The bald head was kind of a turn-off. That might be the scene you're recalling, unless that just happened to be that guy's modus operandi for dungeon raping.

Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 08:56:53 AM

Name: Mwb

John Galt: I stand corrected. I looked and you sir are right.

It WAS the same big guy-lol.



Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 09:13:38 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Sloth: Thank you sir, for another entertaining review. Once again, you seem to have a knack for checking out the same movies that I do. In this case, I did the 7-day download thing from Amazon after SharedJoy told the forum about the movie. I made a few caps from the film in hopes of writing my own review, but overall I just wasn't that impressed with it and decided to skip it. I'm glad you did wrote the review instead, so we could have one for the site. Hope you don't mind, I added some of my caps to your review. Pictures always enhance the written word.

The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.


A Canadian wrote:

Thanks for the official confirmation on Straw Dogs. I'm not surprised but it does make you wonder who the audience is for these lame-ass remakes.

I wonder, too. Based on the turnout for the 5:30 Friday showing that I attended, apparently there's not going to be much of one. I was one of only 5 people in the theater...3 single guys and a couple. The men looked old enough to have been around for the original film, or at least old enough to be familiar with it. Probably hoping to see Kate Bosworth get raped. Ha, what a bunch of pervs. And I should know, because that's why I was there, too.


MAV: Wow, nice find on the "Charlie's Angels" scene. Minka Kelly is too hot, good to see her strung up by her wrists like that. In the 2 second tease we saw, she does appear to be actually suspended, but I wouldn't count on much torture, since this is network TV. Still, that's already an improvement on the original show, since bondage scenes for the Angels were few and far between. I saw another teaser where there was a bound and gagged woman on the bed. Maybe the producers will wise up and realize that the way to enhance the sexiness of their new stars is to make them victims.

Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 12:09:54 PM

Name: Baron von Folter
E-mail address:

Everyone: Keep saying over and over "The remake is NEVER as good as the original". (OK, there are a few but you can count them on one hand).

Now that I have had my fun I would Like to sincerely thank all those who "take one for the team" by obtaining and reviewing "stuff" or who go to the theater to watch new releases. Over the years you all have saved me a small fortune.

One thing I find myself having to avoid is "shooting the messenger" in that most all things reviewed recently 'are not my cup of tea'.

Friedrich, Baron von Folter

Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 05:10:36 PM

Name: YikYakker

Yesterday's Pic (I'm way behind): This is terrific. The colors, the cave setting, the barely-there clothing on the babe, her hair flying just enough to suggest struggling motions. I don't even mind the dirty feet, because it would be ridiculous for her to have clean bare feet in a cave. Very nice image.


Ralphus: You performed a valuable public service by scouting Straw Dogs for us. It's a shame your mission ended in disappointment.

Hoo-boy, I remember going to see movies whose audience members I could count on one hand. Made me feel like I was some kind of perv. Which is OK, because I am.

Meh - now I watch movies by myself, and that leaves my counting hand free for other tasks...


When I see the words cult, ritual and naked shag in the same article, it gets my fantasies going. Especially when they pertain to this pretty thing. I didn't even know Mary-Kate and Ashley had a younger sister. Do we dare hope that this might be a bona fide GIMP scene? I don't want to raise expectations. But the fantasy is nice.


John Galt wrote: I just don't understand these sex-crazed sociopaths who don't strip their victims naked...

It is so lame and unrealistic.

C'mon movie-making dudes...if you can't give us full nudity, at least throw us a bone and show a hot-looking victim. Maybe one of those nice, tight-and-skimpy tank-tops, the ones with the spaghetti straps. Or how about showing an abduction with the girl in her nightie, or just a bath robe, or panties and bra. Maybe some torn clothing, or a top that's slipping off the shoulder a bit. Hell, even movies from the 1950s showed stuff like that.


MAV: Good catch on that Charlie's Angels scene with Minka Kelly.

You wrote: From her reaction and bloody lip, looks like she'll be tortured a bit >;)

That would be great. The original TV show was a tease. Hope this one delivers more goodies.


Sloth: I think you're right...I should let go of that biker-chick movie. Got plenty of other fish to fry: a list of movies to watch, reviews to write, etc. Thanks for helping me decide.

And thanks for the Darkroom review. I remember when we discussed this on the forum. Now our curiosity has been slaked.


John Galt: I understand that Olivia Munn once got rope-tied on her TV show, although I haven't found any decent pics of it. But she does have a bit of GIMPage cred. She served a stint as Jabba the Hut's sex slave, before she broke free.

Wears that gold bikini well, too.

Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 07:18:07 PM

Name: Covers
Homepage URL:

YikYakker: I don't know about Olivia Munn in ropes, but I know of an episode of "Attack of the Show" where she was handcuffed. It's available at Danger Theatre.

Saturday, September 17th 2011 - 10:43:48 PM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

Scribbler: Wouldn't you really only need a single original DVD in order to create a digital copy for virtually unlimited streaming purposes?

Yes, of course. I guess my head is in Netflix DVD rentals cause that's what I do, I've never tried their streaming. One of the reasons for that though is I've read that Netflix has many more movies for DVD rentals than they have for streaming. Maybe they're trying to get there DVD rental vs streaming numbers closer together so they're removing DVD titles! I read some Bollywood movies they used to have are gone too, so it's not all about censoring GIMPlike stuff (no, I don't watch Bollywood movies, I was googling about movies Netflix no longer carries). I Spit On Your Graveis still there.

Mr. Anthony is probably right about licensing for streaming movies. Must be why some movies aren't available for streaming. Could also be Netflix's capacity for streaming as many movies as they have available on DVD isn't possible yet. I wouldn't be surprised if they have a couple Ilsa and other cult movies on DVD that they'll never rent again, but will rip to their streaming servers someday and make available again. Or maybe not. Who knows?


Shame about Straw Dogs. Not unexpected.

Here are more reviews of Straw Dogs 2011 version

And reviews of 1971 version

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 02:57:11 AM

Name: Dangerous Dave

Ralphus, thanks for the heads up on "Straw Dogs". My sole purpose for checking the site today was in the hopes that someone had the 411 on this movie. You know, I just don't understand the thought process of movie makers these days. They look at a classic movie that had nudity and they say, "why don't we remake this movie but without the nudity"? I just can't understand the logic of that. Taking out the nudity robs all of the suspense and power from the material. Maybe Kate Bosworth just wouldn't do it, but you know what? I would have hired some actress that would do it.

I really like the pic you posted today as well. It has a strong Amateur vibe to it. I love it when I find pics out on the Internet where it looks like some dude posted photos from his private stash of old girl friend pics. The realism of it trumps all of the glossy, done in the studio pics that are out there in abundance.

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 03:25:58 AM

Name: Flintstone

I have been reviewing some older ZFX films, and I renewed my interest in Drew Phoenix; she rings most of my bells, attractive, blonde, nice natural tits. I can't tell that she did anything other than the ZFX films; does anyone have any other info?

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 10:38:13 AM

Name: YikYakker
Homepage URL:

Covers: Thanks for the tip on Olivia Munn. I've never seen Attack of the Show; looks like it might be fun.

That blog you linked also looks interesting. It has info about a lot of movies of the kind that I like, but unfortunately are not available in uncut versions...yet.

But with this knowledge, at least one can scrounge for pics and clips.

BTW, I hope you don't mind if I post a picture that I found in your archives. It's a good example of how a non-nude GIMP scene can be spiced up a little.

This comic book cover came out in 1935, folks. Is this country so prudish that a scene like this re-enacted in a present-day mainstream movie would be considered controversial?

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 08:29:13 PM

Name: DHT

All this talk of Olivia Munn brightens my day. If I may:


and, finally

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 08:48:03 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

DHT: Dude, I love Olivia Munn as much as any guy out there, but what do these videos have to do with the theme of the site? The answer is NOTHING. This isn't the first time you've done this. I'll let it slide this time and remind you and everyone else to keep it on topic, please.


Flintstone wrote:

I have been reviewing some older ZFX films, and I renewed my interest in Drew Phoenix; she rings most of my bells, attractive, blonde, nice natural tits. I can't tell that she did anything other than the ZFX films; does anyone have any other info?

You could ask Rick. She rang his bell so much that he married her :) To my knowledge, she and most of the ZFX girls only worked for ZFX.


Dangerous Dave wrote:

You know, I just don't understand the thought process of movie makers these days. They look at a classic movie that had nudity and they say, "why don't we remake this movie but without the nudity"?

I'm not sure that was their mindset; I think the people behind Straw Dogs were more interested in the revenge part of the story rather than the rape aspect. Probably very similar thinking that the producers of I Spit On Your Grave had. That might have been why both went so far with the explicit revenge scenes and toned down the sex part.

Maybe Kate Bosworth just wouldn't do it, but you know what? I would have hired some actress that would do it.

Kate hasn't exactly been a regular fixture on Mr. Skin, if you know what I mean. Very little nudity in her career. But I'm not sure that she accepted the role and then made demands that she wasn't going to get naked. I really don't think the director intended to film the scene with nudity like Peckinpah did. It was a different time back then. Unless someone proves me wrong, I'll contend that major motion pictures, for the most part, no longer film explicit rape scenes, period. Whether it's because of changing audience expectations or else fear of the MPAA censors, they have mostly gone the way of the dinosaur.

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 10:05:57 PM

Name: DHT

If you don't like something I post, take it off. Don't bitch at me about it, because I could truly give a shit either way. Thank you for your time. Good bye.

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 10:09:06 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

DHT: Hey, I asked you nicely. If you want to go off and pout that's your prerogative. We don't have a lot of rules here, and I don't think I'm being unfair. You're always welcome here, provided you stay on topic. How hard is that to figure out? Sheesh...

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 10:18:31 PM

Name: Flintstone

Ralphus, that's what I had heard about Drew but wasn't sure. Rick's a lucky SOB. Thanks for the response.

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 10:43:06 PM

Name: Covers
Homepage URL:

YikYakker: Feel free to repost anything you find on my web site. I don't claim ownership of any of the images, except for the fake Jungle Comics cover that I personally colored.

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 10:58:02 PM

Name: John Galt

Well, having myself recently made an off-topic post referencing a previous post about Olivia Munn and including a link to the infamous Scarlett Johansson leaked cell phone photos, I will allow as how I personally don't mind the occasional off-topic post, and especially not when it involves Olivia Munn because I am a geek and no one has geek cred like the beautiful and sexy Olivia Munn. Except Natalie Portman. Who was in a movie recently--Your Highness--that featured a ceremonial almost-rape scene with the delicious Zooey Deschanel. Notice how I twisted that into a GIMP post? Maybe I need submit that for the Rape Database. It kind of counts. Just waiting for the opportunity to make some vidcaps.

* * * * *

DHT: I will never eat another slice of chocolate cream pie again without thinking of Olivia Munn being, you know, in it. Thank you for that, dude.

* * * * *

Covers: Thanks for that link to a handcuffed Olivia Munn. I could actually edit the clip, starting with her getting drugged and passing out, and make it a great GIMP bit. And I liked THAT SHE WAS BAREFOOT. There, I said it! I like my hot female victims barefoot. Rope bondage would have been better of course, but cuffed hands behind her back in a chair in the middle of a dark room as a guy in a pig mask wielding a chainsaw walked in? It's all good. As long as I cut the scene at that point.

* * * * *

Ralphus and Dangerous Dave: The movie review I mentioned at Ain't It Cool News actually discussed how the Straw Dogs remake misfired on every level. Even if you eviscerate the rape scene, the original featured a meek and mild-mannered guy, if not a physically weak man, who uncharacteristically resorted to brutal violence in response to a threat to him and his slutty wife. The husband in the remake was none of those things. How far away from the original concept can you get and still call it a remake? What's this director going to do next? Remake The Godfather except without, you know, Italian mobsters? Give me a break.

Sunday, September 18th 2011 - 11:12:34 PM

Name: Bill K.

Hay Ralphus hay under a naked gimp are you thinking what I'm thinking. Anyone got a match? Bill K.

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 01:39:12 AM

Name: petelobo

Re: pic of the day.

What the hell is she hanging from? A skyhook? A crow?

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 05:09:26 AM

Name: bp

Re: pic of the day.

What the hell is she hanging from? A skyhook? A crow?


Under the spreading chestnut tree the village harlot hangs?

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 05:54:34 AM

Name: Dangerous Dave

Wow so Rick married Drew Phoenix? I always wonder if any video producers are hooking up with the actresses. Maybe Rick has some stories about any of his other ZFX actors that hooked up? Seems kind of a natural thing I guess, seeing as how you already get the girl naked and you fondle every inch of her. Not a big stretch to take it to the next step I guess. I remember a scene with Drew where she was wearing a yellow jumpsuit that zipped up in front. She got tied or taped up really good and her boobs just spilled out the front of the suit once it was unzipped. Great scene, but can't remember which movie it was from?

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 02:37:21 PM

Name: Bill K.

New Dodge meal:

I know you have to be member of to view this post but it too large (5 pictures post) for me to copy and post here also I don't know how to directly post pics here just know how to post the addresses. I know Ralphus likes Dodge cooked damsels manip art but how about other Gimpers taste in cooked girls.

Bill K.

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 03:00:19 PM

Name: JoeX

Barefoot or high heels? Whatever best serves the storyline is fine with me. I'm reminded of the movie Shuttle, in which each of the new sex slaves received a matching, complementary pair of white high heeled pumps.

Good movie, Shuttle. It could have been a great movie, but the script was just a little too wordy in places. Specifically, the scene where the driver says, "Strip. Underwear stays on." Needed to trim the dialogue by 75%.

Joe X

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 03:24:39 PM

Name: JoeX

Ralphus, you just got done complaining that there weren't enough posts, one way to achieve that is to allow the occasional digression. Just something to think about. I trust your judgment. It's true that we don't want to detour so far that we wind up getting lost.

Joe X

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 03:43:49 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

Joe X wrote:

Ralphus, you just got done complaining that there weren't enough posts, one way to achieve that is to allow the occasional digression.

I shouldn't have to defend my actions here, but I'll do it anyway. First off, I'm not happy that DHT had a temper tantrum and said he was leaving. Hopefully he'll get over it and come back. It's not good for the forum to see one of our regular posters disappear. I like DHT and think he does a fine job of contributing here. I even enjoyed his Olivia Munn video links, even though I had already seen 2 of them before. Bottom line is they just don't belong on a forum about extreme bondage videos. They didn't even have bondage in them at all.

Let's see someone go over to Brian's Page and try to post them there. They would automatically be deleted, along with Brian's ubiquitous deleted post message saying why they were taken off. In fact, he'll delete a bare video link if you don't explain what it's about in your post. Who wants to sit through a 10-minute video wondering what it is you're supposed to be looking for?

I at least left them on the board, along with gently scolding DHT that they were off-topic. And I do allow occasional digressions, such as the posts about Scarlett Johannson's nude pictures. I don't moderate with a heavy hand; I try to keep things fairly loose around here. But if I come to a site about bondage, I don't want to read posts about why Obama is ruining the country, about Katy Perry's new video, about the reality TV star who got breast implants that made her look like a Barbie doll, about whether or not O.J. Simpson killed his wife, or about seeing a picture of Abraham Lincoln shitting (and yes, we got a post like that a few weeks ago. I killed it). They may be perfectly interesting topics, but unless they are about Girls In Merciless Peril, they don't really belong here on this forum.

My job as moderator is to keep the forum talking about the theme of the site, tied-up women. I'm not trying to piss people off, but it's impossible not to sometimes. Anybody wants to criticize me, go for it, I can take it. I think I do a decent job of running things around here and making this a good site to visit.


Dangerous Dave wrote:

I remember a scene with Drew where she was wearing a yellow jumpsuit that zipped up in front. She got tied or taped up really good and her boobs just spilled out the front of the suit once it was unzipped. Great scene, but can't remember which movie it was from?

That was from Scene of the Crime, one of the very first ZFX videos I ever saw, and I totally agree, Drew looked fantastic all trussed up and tape-gagged. I wish I had some better stills, but if you look on Scene 3 of the page I linked, there's some thumbs of her in bondage. She was a helluva fine bondage actress, and she used to help Rick out by running camera in some of the early ZFX productions. She did a great job doing that, too.


Joe X: I agree with you about Shuttle. That's got the most chilling ending to a GIMP movie that I've seen in a long time, where the chick gets crated up aboard a ship, realizing her certain destination is to become a sex slave for some wealthy Asian businessman. Makes you wonder what happens to all those young women that mysteriously turn up missing, huh? Did you read Sardu's review? And you can buy the DVD for less than 4 bucks.

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 07:11:51 PM

Name: Renzo Novatore

I realize that I'm a bit late to the whole censorship discussion, buuut...

"Touche, sir. I was really thinking of legal alternatives, though. The websites you named also work to the detriment of legitimate producers. Especially the ones, like Synapse Films, who track down high-quality surviving prints and work them over to restore them. I think it is unfair to them to go all pirate and deprive them of their profits because your chosen provider won't distribute them. You are punishing the wrong folks, aren't you?"

I sympathize with good companies like Synapse, which I've supported monetarily in the past (I own their fine edition of "Singapore Sling", probably one of the greatest films ever). Even though I admit to using torrents and direct downloading (torrenting is a godsend for hard to find films on private trackers like Cinemageddon, probably one of my favorite websites), I do try to support films that I see and that I made certain to do this with recently was "Let The Right One In" (and, actually, some studies that they've conducted have shown that "pirates" actually tend to do this). However, I actually don't really have much sympathy for the MPAA's/RIAA's whining about intellectual property rights. The music industry especially, you want to talk about pirates, those guys have done more looting from the coffers of musicians than internet pirates can ever hope to do. The VAST majority of revenue to musicians comes from playing shows, not album sales.

In any case, I'm not particularly nostalgic about the way things used to be done, in regards to the entertainment industries. Dinosaurs must die, and people are going to have to adapt, because liberatory technology is evolving at a faster rate than restrictive technology. I mean, ffs, people are selling illegal drugs over the internet now using anonymous computer systems, I hardly think that the war is going to be won against people hosting content illegally. But, if you do enjoy some sort of content, you should reward the producers of said content, especially if it's a smaller, independent label that might not be getting a ton of revenue.

Also, regarding "Shuttle": gotta disagree. Didn't like it at all. I watched it as a horror fan, though, not a bondage/GIMP fan. For horror I thought it failed; it stretched the ol' suspension of disbelief factor even more so than most horror films, and I thought the ending was just a cheap ploy by the filmmakers to give the film some emotional hit in what was otherwise a very bland film.

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 07:48:50 PM

Name: A Canadian

Ralphus wrote:

That was from Scene of the Crime, one of the very first ZFX videos I ever saw, and I totally agree, Drew looked fantastic all trussed up and tape-gagged.

Actually, Scene of the Crime is the only Drew Phoenix movie I have seen. I definitely agree that her scenes were the highlight of the film.

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 10:24:41 PM

Name: Vince

Guys, if you haven't seen it yet on the West Coast and want to catch the rerun, you have to see The Playboy Club. It's off to a good start when the goddess Amber Heard in her Playboy outfit becomes the almost involuntary fuck object of a middle aged bald man and that happens within the first 10 minutes.

The mobster pins Amber against a wall and makes advances at her. He tries to kiss her and stroke her tits. She resists and pushes him away. That force also throws her to the floor. When she lands on the floor the rapist pulls her body toward him. The mobster gets on her and touches her including her leg. Amber tries to fight off her rapist fiercely. Then there's a stupid cutaway to male star walking to the isolated area. Amber is still putting up a good fight. Legs spread apart. The mobster looks like he might succeed. But the male star hears a noise, rushes into the room, pulls the thug back and Amber kicks him in the neck with her stiletto.

For a broadcast show it's good enough especially with Amber dressed as a bunny. If we can't have rape in movies, I'm happy to see it on TV.

Monday, September 19th 2011 - 11:48:53 PM

Name: John Galt

According to Mr Skin, the new Charlie's Angels is going to have an episode entitled Angels in Chains, most likely based on an episode from the original series that can best be described as "Angels in Prison." Of course, this is broadcast TV, so I wouldn't get my hopes up. Still, it might have something brief but GIMP-worthy.

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 12:27:12 AM

Name: BP

...or about seeing a picture of Abraham Lincoln shitting (and yes, we got a post like that a few weeks ago. I killed it).


Was it the one about him making Lincoln Logs?

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 05:45:43 AM

Name: John Galt

Vince: Oddly enough, I hadn't planned on watching The Playboy Club. I think I figured it would not be worth seeing since it was a broadcast TV production, even if it did feature Amber Heard, who is no stranger to nudity. But your post compelled me to investigate--well, to watch the first 10 minutes or so--and here are a few vidcaps from the assault scene. You know, this would have had a lot more promise if it had been on one of the cable channels.

Amber Heard in The Playboy Club

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 07:01:02 AM

Name: Sloth

Guys, speaking of Amber Heard, a daughter who works at a vid store brought home a movie last night and began to view - a remake of the 1970 film "And Soon the Darkness" starring Pamela Franklin - and now Amber gets the role - alas the only thing remotely Gimp worthy is the opening sequence where a bound and chained chick in tattered clothing gets lashed across her thighs with a live wire - woefully short, darkly filmed but hey, it is electro no matter how brief.

After Ralphus bombed on "Straw Dogs" the remake route is becoming some type of Gimp Kafkaesque nightmare.

Stay well all

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 12:07:33 PM

Name: Renzo Novatore

Thanks to the people who rec'd some "Attackers" films with whipping scenes a while back, it was helpful.

I've been checking out some of the "Slave Castle" series lately. I haven't been too impressed. I'm someone who likes lezdom a great deal when it's done right, but the problem is Slave Castle...isn't done right. Dressing the lead domme ("Riria") up like a weird anime character and having her cackle, as in one particular scene I saw, is not lezdom done right. Riria in general doesn't really impress me with her domming skills. That's not to say the series doesn't have some good spots...I only saw two of the videos, but in one the lead actress looks genuinely ashamed/humiliated when she has to go down on another woman. But overall I wouldn't give it high marks.

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 02:24:57 PM

Name: A Canadian

Renzo Novatore wrote:

I've been checking out some of the "Slave Castle" series lately. I haven't been too impressed.

Can't say I blame you. I was a fan of the original Slave Island series but most of the slave films that have followed that series haven't done it for me. Something got lost along the way.

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 06:05:43 PM

Name: MeetThePryz

Yeah, the Slave Castle series is pretty weak, as are most of the post-Slave Island "Slave" series.

This month's Slave Party was pretty tame.

This month's Slave Investigator was alright, and the closest to the Slave Island series that Attackers has made since that ended. They're launching it as a full series from the start, with the 2nd entry already finished before the 1st was released.

It plays up the forced pregnancy theme, Pine Shizuka gets killed AGAIN, which makes me think she generally has a snuff-fetish and asks for these scenes, and there are 4 slaves that are more than just background characters. However, it isn't quite as dark and depressing as the Slave Island series.

I haven't seen Slave Color 17 anywhere. I guess people aren't even bothering with that series anymore... a bit of a shame, as the Slave Fiance and Slave Teacher entries are actually pretty good.

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 06:36:22 PM

Name: Michael Goi
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

In the course of reading several reviews of my movie "Megan Is Missing," I came across the thread of comments on this site. I certainly appreciate that my movie is a difficult one to watch, and it does not fit in the typical GIMP profile of being entertaining. This is why I found the debate about the merits of my film especially gratifying. I have been criticized (attacked?) by some who felt I was glorifying the violence against children depicted in the movie, but your posters on the whole recognized that this was not the case. Your readers are able to separate the fantasy aspect of the situations depicted in my movie from the fact that it is not intended to be a good time at the show. In many ways, you were the only ones who were able to do so.

Thank you for the spirited debate, and for recognizing the seriousness with which I am trying to get the public to understand what is being glossed over on the nightly news. A movie like mine is not going to make someone a child predator who is not already disposed to be one, and your comments are a welcome validation that the spirit in which "Megan Is Missing" was created can be correctly interpreted by an intelligent viewership with an open mind.

Michael Goi
Megan Is Missing

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 06:46:28 PM

Name: Vince

Hey John, you're welcome to the advance notice of attempted rape scene in "The Playboy Club". But I want to thank you for the vidcaps.

I agree with you that this scene and this show, to reach its potential which is, to be honest, just seeing good looking girls as close to naked as possible, really belongs on cable.

My feeling is that a lot of people were not going to make "The Playboy Club" appointment TV. However discussing it here, I'm sure a lot of GIMPers will give it a look when they hadn't thought so before.

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 08:18:08 PM

Name: John Galt

Vince: My pleasure. I'm glad you liked the vidcaps. I still haven't watched the entire episode, nor do I feel particularly inclined to. But that was certainly a nice few minutes there.

* * * * *

Michael Goi: It is so cool to hear from producers. I was on the side of the spirited debate you probably didn't agree with. Without minimizing the seriousness of sexual crimes against children, I disagree that cases like these are glossed over in the media. I believe rare but potentially sensationalistic crimes--especially sex crimes and most especially sex crimes involving children--are broadcast and rebroadcast ad infinitum to drive up TV viewership by satisfying the salacious sensibilities of a sick society while forcing the victims and/or surviving friends and families to re-live the horror over and over and over. We can disagree about that.

But it is your movie, of course, and my interpretation is my own. I would not begin to try to pontificate on your motivation. Remember the classic Marshall McLuhan scene from Annie Hall? I'm not going to be that guy in line.

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 09:31:16 PM

Name: Vince

John, to tell you the truth, I haven't watched the whole episode of "The Playboy Club" yet myself either.

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 09:59:28 PM

Name: Margot
Homepage URL:

A new post by Reine Margot (I think I'll trademark that)

The Internet is down where I am. It happens way too often, which is a really big pain in the behind. I'm taking advantage to think, write and think again. Why not write a post?

Well, it's been sometime since I gave you all the news about the release of Maleficarum. It's set, as you all know, for the 31st of October which is getting nearer and nearer.

As the day approaches, rather quickly, we increase our work... more hours a day dedicated to Maleficarum. We're aiming to have everything ready with ample time to spare.

In addition, this fast coming Monday we have to show the film to the execs at the theatre where we'll have the premiere on the 31st.

They like the idea of having this special premiere, but, alas, they haven't seen the film! However we kindly gave advance word to them warning them that this is not an easy film to see, that it might be too shocking for some audiences. "It's an extreme film" we said.

They have to see it, of course, they have to make sure that it's up to level as far as the technical specs.

We're curious to know how they are going to react. This film has everything that our regular Red Feline productions have: Lots and lots of nudity, lots and lots of torture, lots and lots of gore all of that within a plot.

The Spanish Horse scene, in itself, it's so graphic and so harsh that I don't think a lot of people will be able to sit and watch. So... we don't know if the film will pass the test of what's basically a disguised censorship. But, even if we don't have a limited theatrical release, we'll have the world wide release of this film on the 31st AS PLANNED!

We're very excited about this, of course, we labored so hard on this one, that we're anxious to see how it turns out and how it's received.

For what I can see when I peak into the editing suite, Maleficarum is looking great, it's a handsome movie, great photography, sets and locations that we always dreamt off, good acting and the looks of a very professional, high budget movie. It has a style of its own, actually JJ's style, and some good period music with modern undertones.

So, we're getting it done, finally, and it's a lot of hard, slow, tense work.

A new release and other news.

However, Maleficarum is not the only production we are dealing with, as you all know. We just released a new Red Feline Production, a very nice, simple one which serves as an introduction to our new talented and sexy Mila.

She was "discovered" by JJ when Jane was having back therapy. Mila was the new receptionist at the clinic and JJ thought she had a really exotic, intriguing and beautiful look about her.

It wasn't long before he started talking to her and weeks later they were discussing the possibility of her joining our group.

In July of last year she began to train in the arts of acting with JJ himself and in October of last year she started to work on the first scenes of Maleficarum and almost simultaneously she was one of the wives of Barbazul.

And soon after we were done shooting Maleficarum, she became the prisoner of Le Marquis De La Croix.

So... she already had three feature films under her belt when JJ felt inspired to do something else with her.

One day, when Jane was in the US dealing with difficult personal issues and the rest of us were busy with the movies, JJ and Mila got into a conversation that led them to wander off into the isolated and far off location where Jane was crucified in Romana Crucifixa.

The intention was to make a photo shoot as a study of what they could do in that location. They planned a day shoot. That was all, but they took ropes and a whip and two cameras and tripods ... just in case.

They also had water and food for the day. A picnic indeed.

Once there, after taking a few pictures, JJ was inspired to go ahead and shoot a movie. The day was beautiful, sunny, windy, very windy, and Mila was willing to go all the way.

The result is our new release. The Via Crucis of Mila - Crux 1 - The Tree of Pain.

You can see a trailer below.

This production is available for Downloads and in DVD

The story is simple. JJ takes Mila for a walk, she's barefoot, all tied up and has to suffer the whip and the sharp stones on the ground during her walk. She's taken to the tree of pain where she's whipped and then crucified. As simple as that. But the reactions to the movie a day after its release were very nice.

This is what one of our fans had to say about it.

What can I say? Mila has an interestingly pretty face, a perfect body for this subject and apparently amazing skill at projecting her helplessness and pain. Welcome to her and thanks to you.

And another fan said:

Bought it straight-away Margot, you know what a long-time fan of 'your' (and I do mean 'all of your') work that I am -- Mila's performance was exotically sensual!

And another:

Great production, Margot! Looking forward to the sequels...

Well, we know Mila's work very well now. We've been working with her for many months now in roles that require a lot of courage, physical strength and of character as well. But this new release is a nice introduction to Mila for our fans while they wait for the three big productions where she shows her perfecting craft.

Looking back to the day of the shooting of this movie, it's clear that it was not a day wasted, indeed.

There will be more work for Mila ahead, she's ready to give her all in roles that fit her like a glove.

Jane, in the meantime, is working very hard with the editing of a new Via Crucis of Camille release and preparing two scripts for her future features.

She's very excited about the release of Maleficarum, where she displays her capacity for pain and resistance, but she's anxious to release Le Marquis De La Croix and Barbazul, her two new feature films, which will establish her as a tremendous and daring director ... who happens to be a woman ... who happens to be a great actress ... and who has looks and talent going for her big time.

With all this work, do we have time for anything else?

Well, yes and no. We do try to have some personal time but Jane hasn't been able to take her long deserved vacation, her trip to the US was not a holiday, it was harder than any work she does. It doesn't look like any of us is going to have a vacation until after the release of Maleficarum and then, maybe then, we'll take a break and Jane and JJ will be able to go on that trip they have been planning for some time, without cameras, computers or anything of the sort. Just their bathing suits, a few towels and off to the summery beaches of Mar del Plata or someplace like that.

But there are some plans in the work. A Roman series where both Jane and Mila will play slaves to a very cruel but fair Roman Senator. We're also preparing to shoot the now highly anticipated spy movie Jane is going to direct.

And the releases... all those releases...

Enough said. I'm expecting some teasers and a trailer for Maleficarum.... soon... VERY soon.

Reine Margot has spoken. ;)

Tuesday, September 20th 2011 - 11:24:54 PM

Name: John Galt

Margot: Thank you for another sensational illustrated Red Feline update. Really, you're describing another world to me. Bosses who go for walks with actress/models and end up shooting a torture crucifixion movie instead. An actress/model who was a receptionist who caught the eye of the filmmaker during a therapy visit, at that. Previewing an extreme film to some cinema execs for them to approve for a premiere showing.

My world is so prosaic in comparison. It's nice to be reminded there are places where knee-jerk religious oppression doesn't dictate the societal limitations of everyday life. And I'm not referring to the world of Maleficarum, either. Although I am kind of appreciative that my Internet access doesn't go down all that much. I don't think I owe that to puritanical religious fundamentalists, though. I suspect if those folks had their way, my Internet would go down a lot, especially since it is constantly accessing content they would disapprove of.

Looking forward to Maleficarum. Be sure to let us know how we can secure our very own DVDs or downloads.

Wednesday, September 21st 2011 - 02:40:19 PM

Name: YikYakker

Catching up...

I guess I was the one who got the whole Olivia Munn thing started...that's why I've been lying low the past few days. ;)

But seriously, I vow never to mention her name again on this board...

...unless she gets tied AOH, stripped and whipped.


JoeX wrote: Barefoot or high heels? Whatever best serves the storyline is fine with me.

Well, that is certainly a common-sense approach and I applaud your concise view on the topic.


Yesterday's Pic: Wow, this is great - this girl has a beautiful bod, I wonder who she is?

It would be fun to learn how to do these kinds of pics - I guess you need PhotoShop or some kind of similar software to create these things. Seems like a lot of fun.


Today's Pic: Some people subscribe to the view that coffee enemas are good for your health.

Nah. Couldn't be true.


Margot: Your post was both stimulating and timely. I think I speak for many here when I say that one cannot go for very long without a Margot fix. And of course, the pics of Mila and Jane, are, as usual, stunning.

I hope what I'm about to say won't be misconstrued, but I think Jane looks even more buff than usual in those horse shots. Maybe it's the lighting or the moisture on her skin, or maybe all of the challenging GIMPage scenes have really toned her muscles.

Jane, begging your pardon for my leering comments, but you look hotter with each successive movie you do. I can't wait to see this one.

And that view-from-behind of Mila tied to the tree (in VCOM) really rocks my world.

Only five and half weeks until Halloween, folks.

Wednesday, September 21st 2011 - 04:47:05 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

Michael Goi: Wow, what a pleasant surprise seeing you here. This is a legitimate Hollywood director and cinematographer, guys. Check out his IMDB page. I think he qualifies as another one of our Notable Guests. I'm glad you had the courage to make a public appearance on a site that, like your film, tends to be a more extreme than what the mainstream crowd is used to.

Thank you very kindly for your feedback. You made a helluva good movie. Your film brought strong reactions from our readers, and we're guys who are used to looking at bondage, rape and torture films on a regular basis. The fact that you could shock even us is an indication that you did a good job making it. As a filmmaker, you want to have an impact and make your viewers hopefully think about your message. I don't think a lot of us will ever casually dismiss another missing person story on the news after seeing your film.


John Galt: I agree with what you said about these types of stories, namely missing person cases involving young, attractive women, are indeed prevalent in the media. That's one of the points Michael Goi was trying to make, and indeed, none too subtly in having parts of the film show how the Megan case was being covered on the local television news and even recreated in a cheesy crime reenactment show. While the media may have good intentions, these stories often end up as sensationalistic exploitation. Like I mentioned in my review, they jump on the stories where the victim is pretty, while similar missing persons cases are virtually ignored if the missing person doesn't meet their criteria. Sad but totally true.

In Cincinnati, Ohio near where I live, the top story for the past month has been about this missing woman, 22 years old, beautiful and white. They even brought in a nationally renowned rescue team this past week to help search for her, the same team who searched for Natalee Holloway and Casey Anthony's daughter. At the very same time, another woman the exact same age also turned up missing, except this woman is black, badly overweight and mentally retarded. And you never hear anything about her. Where's her rescue team? Presumably, the media doesn't even care about this story because they don't consider her as newsworthy.


Vince: Thanks for the heads up on the Amber Heard near-rape scene on "The Playboy Club". And thanks to John for the vidcaps. I was able to view the scene and here's my take: a brand new series, the very first show, the first 4 minutes and there's already an attempted rape scene with the most attractive woman on the show. I absolutely love it. The scene itself was too brief for my tastes (that's network TV for you) but I love that they know exactly what turns men women as victims. Talk about getting the series off to a good start.


Margot: Awesome update as always and the pictures are great. This forum is better whenever you can stop by with one of your mammoth postings. You might not have read my previous reply to you since it had already scrolled off, but would it be possible to release the Maleficarum DVD with an additional commentary track? I know I would love to hear Jane and JJ discussing the ins and outs of making this movie, and it might encourage others to buy the DVD instead of taking the illegal step of trying to download it somewhere from file sharers. Aside from a making-of documentary, that would be the ultimate DVD extra. Is this something you would be able to do?

Wednesday, September 21st 2011 - 06:49:28 PM

Name: YikYakker

Today's Pic: This guy hasn't even started whipping her yet and already he's got a woody.

Thursday, September 22nd 2011 - 12:45:38 PM

Name: Michael Goi
Homepage URL:

Ralphus: You hit on a point I was making regarding the kinds of cases that get media coverage. When I started to cast the film, I was on the board of directors of an organization in Hollywood dedicated to increasing diversity in the film industry. Another board member asked if I was going to be colorblind in casting my movie and look at all races for the leads. I said no, the girls are going to be cute and white. The board member asked why I would do that when I was in a position to change that dynamic. I said I needed people to plug into the reality of the movie by making it seem familiar to them, like what they experience on the news every night. And cute, white girls get the bulk of media coverage in child disappearance cases. It's the reason why I mentioned in one of the news broadcasts that a boy named Turcel Jackson from Crenshaw was also abducted. He got about fifteen seconds of airtime compared to Megan, who got an entire program. Almost 40 percent of abducted and murdered children are boys. How many of them do you see on TV in comparison to girls?

Years ago, I was filming a movie in a small town in Texas. The sheriff from a neighboring town stopped by to watch the filming, and he invited me over to his town to see "the head." About ten years earlier, the head of a middle-aged Mexican man was found on the side of the road near his town. No body, just the head. The sheriff called federal law enforcement, and they told him to put the head on ice and they would assign an investigator to the case. So they put him in the freezer in the office, and there he'd been for ten years. I asked the sheriff, "You're giving tours of the head??!!" He told me it was alright because I was a filmmaker, like he was saying I was a doctor or something. Now, I have to think that if this was a blonde, 16 year old female instead of a middle-aged Mexican man, the law and the media would be all over the case. But the reality is that this man's head was in that freezer (and may still be for all I know) for at least ten years with no one looking into who he was or how he died.

The technical advisor for my film, who is a forensics investigator, was involved in an ongoing investigation into the murders of 19 boys, mostly black and Hispanic from lower class homes, over the last 7 years. The murders stretched from Toronto down to Mississippi, and are obviously the work of the same killer. He asked if I had ever heard of these murders, and I told him I had never heard of any of them. He said that was exactly the problem; they couldn't get the news wires to drum up any interest in these boys because they fit the profile of runaways and they were "ethnically not good television."

I think there needs to be a 24 hour cable station with nothing but reports of missing children. All children, not just the cute, white female ones. My friend Marc Klaas is trying to push through a program that would install television monitors in every truckstop in the country with up to the minute reports of abducted children. Since truckers are on the road more hours than an average person, they have a high potential to view an Amber alert vehicle quite rapidly after an alert has been posted.

Sorry for the long post, but this subject of child safety is one that I feel strongly about. So strongly that I made an entire movie on the subject. And whether you agree or disagree with my movie or how I made it (yes John, I mean you!), I like the fact that it has inspired discussion and debate, because that means it has been experienced.

Michael Goi

Thursday, September 22nd 2011 - 07:04:39 PM

Name: John Galt

Michael Goi: I applaud your desire to want to bring attention to child abductions that are overlooked by the media. It is apparent that we both agree that the cases of abductees who are "ethnically not good television" do not get the same airplay as, say, pretty white girls. Cynic that I am, I believe your 24-hour cable station would still rerun the pretty white girls more often, if not exclusively, because who wants to sit and watch a 24-hour cable news channel that keeps putting up pictures of unattractive minority males who have gone missing? I mean, is that how you would spend your day? In fact, it kind of creeps me out wondering who would sit and watch a 24-hour cable news channel exclusively featuring pictures of real, live pretty white girls who were missing and suspected kidnap victims in the Real World.

I watch movies for entertainment, not for education or "a message." For that reason, I want my victims to be pretty white girls, although really, pretty girls of almost any ethnicity works for me. I would not watch a movie with unattractive, overweight, old, handicapped or otherwise, um, undesirable females because I am not interested in what might happen in the Real World; I am looking to satisfy my prurient interests. I freely admit that, and I don't think I am alone in my preferences. But I am unapologetic because I am watching a movie and the movie is an entertainment vehicle being made to appeal to the greatest number of viewers. I am not watching the news, and I think it is absolutely unacceptable that the news skews itself to appeal to the greatest number of viewers as well. It's the FUCKING NEWS and it has an OBLIGATION to report what is happening, not just the things that get good ratings. Mass Media = Epic Fail.

You appear to have made your movie to make a point. It sounds like maybe it was a "message" movie. At which point you lost me, as I abhor "message" movies. But kudos for wanting to make a difference because there are far too few people in the world who want to make a difference any more.

However, if your goal was to bring attention to how the media spends all its time publicizing and wailing about abducted pretty white girls while pointedly ignoring the "ethnically not good television" victims, I'm not sure how making a movie featuring abducted pretty white girls as victims did that. If you were attempting to convey how the media go overboard for some victims and should throttle back, well, I did not get that from your movie at all. If you were being ironic by showing the brief clip about Turcel Jackson in the midst of the media blitz about Megan, well, I think maybe you were far too subtle, and I seriously doubt if very many people picked up on that reporting discrepancy, being far more excited about what misfortune was in store for pretty white Megan.

It was a bold movie to make, though, and I hope people got the message you intended, whatever that message was, which I hope was more nuanced than "kidnapping children is A Bad Thing."

And by the way, I thought it really sucked that they left The Nine Lives of Chloe King on a serious cliffhanger and then didn't renew it for another season. If you run into any of the nimrods who made the bonehead decision to leave their viewers hanging like that, pass along my contempt. Thanks. (The series had nice cinematography, though.)

Thursday, September 22nd 2011 - 10:37:40 PM

Name: Renzo Novatore

I dunno, I kind of like "message movies", but it depends on how the message is constructed. Few people like to be beaten over the head or preached at when they're watching a film for entertainment purposes. Films like "American Psycho" or "Robocop" are definitely "message movies", but they package their message in a sly, cynical manner, which I like a great deal (Paul Verhoeven in general is a master at this sort of thing).

And really, almost all films have messages in them. Even the most moronic slasher films may be interpreted as an indication of our society's views on promiscuity. Perhaps straightfoward pornography would fall outside this category, but generally speaking all films contain little trappings of the ideology/social order they were bred in, making the message movie a matter of scale more than anything else, IMO.

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 12:03:53 AM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

Well, watched "Charlie's Angels" pilot tonight, and it was kind of like a message movie. The message being our writers suck and our dialog is awful. Yeah, there was Minka Kelly bondage, she was suspended and tazed, but it was kinda just there, didn't get a rise out of me. Plus she was wearing too much clothes.

Bummer. I was hoping this would be fairly good show, kinda like "Chuck" or "Alias" but alas...nope. There was other bondage, but nothing great (not to me anyway). I predict the message viewers or future lack of viewers will send this show is "cancel this lame show."

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 01:15:40 AM

Name: MAV
Homepage URL:

In case anyone missed it, Minka Kelly had a short but sweet (IMO) GIMP scene tonight. Suspended AOH then tasered and punched with good acting. Sam posted the scene up on's Video page.

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 01:16:55 AM

Name: Sloth
Homepage URL:

When it comes to the reporting on the missing it seems whatever entity brings the story forth faces the problem of competing internal interests - providing fair impartial coverage regardless of race/gender/economic level etc or generate revenue by keeping ratings up regardless of other considerations - my cynical nature says revenue will win out every time and that's just the harsh reality - a sad commentary on human nature with no resolution in sight.

That said, the idea of monitors in truck stops is inspired - the best informants I ever had were on the road, whether that be urban or highway, trucker or cabbie - not only do they see a lot, the KNOW a lot in that arena - hope that works out for you Michael Goi.

So touring the YouTube wasteland I stumbled across this yesterday at the above link - judging from the posters name he's exclusively chloro and not into bondage - this scene from the latest Dunwich Horror looks chopped - I wonder if there is additional bondage/torment footage before she's sacrificed to "the dark one"? - if anyone has seen the movie please let me know.

Notice our friend Hank Hobbs has a new set of stills and clips from "The Sinful Dwarf", possibly the sleaziest movie ever made - damn, have to dig that out and give it a view now.

Stay well all

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 09:20:03 AM

Name: Jane von Detlefson
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Well, I really can't compete with Margot's epic illustrated posts, but I thought I would drop by and say hi and catch up and whatnot.

John Galt - Thank you for putting it into perspective for me. I'm not being sarcastic when I write that I often feel like my life is rather prosaic (I actually prefer it that way, as too much excitement makes me anxious), but I suppose my life is pretty exciting, or at least making movies is exciting and I make a lot of movies. I think I'm betraying how geeky I am here. Maybe not. I think our lives must seem much more exciting to Mila, being the chosen one and all plucked from my back therapist's waiting room. Me, I chose this, the awkward geeky girl who likes to pretend I'm a hot actress.

YikYakker - Thank you. Really. So, I'm hotter with every successive movie, am I ? This is me taking it the right way. I love compliments. See, that's the beauty of the internet, no one can see me blush uncomfortably like I do in real life when someone throws me a compliment and I automatically hunch over and make some knee-jerk wise-crack response to cover up the blushing. Or stare at them not knowing what to say. More often the latter response.

So, I guess you all want JJ and I to do a commentary, do you? You really want to listen to me making observational "dad jokes" for two hours? I'm serious, they're my speciality. That's probably the main reason I'm addicted to CSI Miami, and Las Vegas (the Grisham ones). They're good for at least one classic dad joke per episode. Right, getting back on topic. I'll think about it. Trick or treat.

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 11:32:53 AM

Name: esso
E-mail address:

Margot - Glad to see the October 31 release date is still in effect but that does bring a question to mind - if Maleficarum is ready prior to that, why not release it early? Hard release dates are really only necessary when there is either a diverse distribution system in place and the producer/publisher/manufacturer wants a uniform national release, or when there is a publicity campaign leading up to the date trying to build suspense, usually some kind of a teaser campaign. Neither seems to be the case here. Just a thought.

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 04:03:09 PM

Name: YikYakker

Jane von Detlefson wrote:

So, I'm hotter with every successive movie, am I ?

Yes, you are. But please be careful with your back. We wouldn't want you to find it necessary to hire a stunt double. ;)


Sloth wrote:

Hank Hobbs has a new set of stills and clips from "The Sinful Dwarf", possibly the sleaziest movie ever made...

Don't know why I've never checked this movie out. Maybe it was because I heard that Ralphus's pre-Bloodsucking Freaks performances did not measure up to the high standards he set in his later works. But that's probably just nasty show-biz innuendo.

On the basis of your ringing endorsement and Hiccup's favorable review, I'm going to add this one to my list of movies to see.


Today's Pic: The first thought that entered my head when I beheld this image was "Damn. That babysitter's tits are each the same size as the baby's head." Oh, yes...I am truly a sick man.

But my second thought was "We are witnessing the budding of a promising GIMPer career."

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 06:47:17 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

Michael Goi: Absolutely no need to apologize for a long post, especially when it's a post as interesting as yours. Unlike John Galt, I totally got the reference immediately when you included the 15-second blurb about the missing black boy which was thrown in at the end of an entire program devoted to the missing attractive white girl. I remember chuckling to myself at what I thought was an ironic dig at how the media was virtually ignoring his story because they cared more about the pretty girl. I didn't think it was subtle at all, but maybe not everyone got the joke.


John Galt wrote:

I would not watch a movie with unattractive, overweight, old, handicapped or otherwise, um, undesirable females because I am not interested in what might happen in the Real World; I am looking to satisfy my prurient interests.

You and me both. That's why it was smart of Michael Goi to make a film about pretty, white girls. If the film were about missing unattractive females or even males, I doubt I would have tuned in, either, no matter how well the film was made. Was he being ironic by casting attractive young women and then making a point about how the media only seems to care about the pretty girls? Maybe, but he's also trying to make a film that people will check out. There's a reason why you see attractive women all over TV and the movies and it all comes down to 2 words: Sex sells.


Minka Kelly suspended and tazed on Charlie's Angels: That was a pleasure to watch Minka Kelly get tortured, although again, typical of TV, it was painfully short. I was hoping for something along the lines of Rhona Mitra's bravura suspension scene in Doomsday, but it's still Minka Kelly and I'll take what I can get. I'll see if I can get that added to the Torture Rack Database soon.


Jane von Detlefson wrote:

So, I'm hotter with every successive movie, am I ?

Well, I don't know. You're already hot enough. Once you reach a certain degree of hotness, the only thing that can make you hotter would be to...I dunno, maybe roast you on a spit or burn you at the stake? And this is your next movie, right? Okay, then yes, I would say you'll definitely be hotter this time around.

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 07:44:17 PM

Name: John Galt

Jane von Detlefson: Okay, you can go on my list of hot geeky girls along with Olivia Munn. Honestly, though, I think the better GIMP flicks will be coming from you and you alone. And I think you and JJ could talk about more than "dad jokes" in a commentary track. How uncomfortable the wooden horse was. What it was like being roasted on a spit. The suggestions Ralphus made and how you adapted to them and which ones maybe he made that you couldn't do. The "making of" aspects from initial discussions to completion. Random people walking in on filming at the most inopportune times. I'm sure a lot of stuff happened that aficionados would find entertaining. Margot has mentioned some fascinating and insightful tidbits in her epic posts. Give it some thought. I think it would be cool.

* * * * *

Scribbler was absolutely right. Charlie's Angels was abysmal. Bad dialog. Mediocre acting. Miscast performers. And a shocking lack of jiggle. I did notice that the address of the Townsend Agency was 1976 Ocean Drive--1976 being the year the original jiggle-fest known as Charlie's Angels premiered on ABC. That was about the cleverest thing in the entire show. But in the spirit of fairness, I think I should point out that in addition to Minka Kelly's suspension and torture by taser, we also had a kidnapped and bound white girl behind the credits and an entire room of minority girls chained up in a warehouse. I can understand why no one mentioned the minority girls, but how could you overlook the kidnapped white girl? Baggy clothes, I'm thinking....

Minka Kelly and Others

And did you notice Minka Kelly's feet in that first picture? Why didn't someone tell her to point her toes? (Who the hell was the suspension technical advisor on this show? He or she should be fired! Oh wait. Everyone who had a part in this train-wreck should be fired.) I can't help thinking if she had been barefoot, then maybe her feet would have been pointed downward. You know?

* * * * *

I also had a good laugh while I was reading the Jon Stewart interview in a recent Rolling Stone magazine (Issue #1140). He was talking about how the Bush administration had figured out they could weather any political disaster by just waiting out the news cycle. Stewart's quote:

They realized, 'Oh, you know what we could do? Nothing! 'Cause you know what's going to happen? A white girl's going to disappear somewhere and all this shit's going to go away. And nobody's going to be bothering us anymore about whether the attorney general is full of shit when he's saying he doesn't know if we fired prosecutors. So we can wait that out.'

White girls disappearing get all the headlines they need. They take over the news cycle. It was a timely affirmation of my point, so at least I know Jon Stewart agrees with me on that.

Friday, September 23rd 2011 - 11:14:21 PM

Name: DHT

Galt: No, your point was that child abductions don't happen often enough for you to be worth making a movie about or otherwise bother drawing attention to.

Saturday, September 24th 2011 - 12:02:55 AM

Name: John Galt

So on the Upcoming Nude Scenes website I ran across this item about a movie called Territories that looks like it has an ever-so-brief GIMP bit in it. Some young people are crossing back over the border from Canada and run afoul of psycho border agents. The GIMP scene has one of the girls handcuffed to a tree while the border guy strips off her panties and conducts a cavity search. The web page links to a video clip, but it is an MP4 clip and my poor Linux workstation didn't have the video power to play it smoothly. I had to convert it to an AVI file. But it's a nice clip. Just too brief.

Saturday, September 24th 2011 - 12:57:45 AM

Name: Scot
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

As long as we're discussing child abductions and media coverage of them, it's important to put a few facts in perspective. The vast majority of children reported as "missing" are either simply lost and turn up within a day or two, or they're taken by the non-custodial parent in a divorce or separation. According to FBI statistics, about 115 children under age 15 are kidnapped by strangers in the U.S. each year. That's less than one in a million. It does parents a disservice to feed exaggerated and unwarranted fears that their child might be snatched at any moment from under their noses.

And now, back to our sweet tortured ladies.

Saturday, September 24th 2011 - 01:12:29 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

I've added a few new entries to the Whipping Scenes in Movies Database lately, including upgraded stills from Jess Franco's Kiss Me Monster and the classic women's prison flick, Bamboo House of Dolls. Check out the database if you haven't been there for a while. I've been trying to add new entries every week.

Also added a new entry, description, download link and hi-res vidcaps from the Minka Kelly suspension torture scene in Charlie's Angels in the Torture Rack Scenes Database. Minka looks so hot.

Saturday, September 24th 2011 - 05:16:56 PM

Name: SharedJoy
Homepage URL:

Thanks to Sloth and Ralphus for the review and pics for The Dark Room!

I still haven't managed to see it myself, though after the review... well, I admit it, I'm still interested.

It's always been more about the HELPLESSNESS than anything else for me, and from the pics, it seems like there's at least a bit of that in there... :)

I did manage to get a couple of promising Gimp-ish Kindle short stories recently -- "Jimmy", which was briefly reviewed here earlier and is definitely worth the buck for the depictions of two helpless hanging girl victims (particularly the first) -- and "Let's Go Play At The Adams 2", a sequel of sorts to the awesome full-length novel, which I have not finished yet, but which so far seems to be spectacularly pointless, from a GIMP perspective.

I'll post again if the latter story becomes more interesting...

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 05:04:49 AM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt wrote:

It is apparent that we both agree that the cases of abductees who are "ethnically not good television" do not get the same airplay as, say, pretty white girls.

Ethnic background is a huge factor in how much coverage these cases get, but it's not the only one. The attractiveness of the victim is also a factor, as Canadians saw years ago in the coverage of the disappearance of the two teenage girls who were ultimately killed by Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka. Perhaps some expert could prove me wrong, but I would say the disappearance of the first girl -- who was average looking, and came from a family on the wrong side of the tracks -- didn't attract nearly as much attention as the disappearance of the second girl, a homecoming queen type from a good family.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 09:29:34 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

SharedJoy: I kinda jumped in my seat when you mentioned "Let's Go Play At The Adams 2". What? The original book is arguably the best book ever written about bondage, and it's ironic you're bringing it up now since I've been running daily pictures about kids tying up their babysitters.

But I'm thinking, how could they have possibly written a sequel to this book, since the author is dead, and presumably all the rights to the original story and characters died along with him, right? Plus that, Barbara the babysitter died at the end of the book, so where are they going to go with the story? The children who performed the deed the first time grow up, have kids of their own, hire a babysitter for them, then tie her up?

I recall years ago there was a writer on Brian's Page named Pat Powers who wrote an alternate final chapter for the first book, making it so that Barbara survived. I never finished reading it, so I'm not sure what exactly happened, and I can't find any trace of it anywhere on the net. One thing I remember that was disconcerting was he screwed up the name of Paul (my favorite character) and called him "Peter" this time around. Maybe he was thinking of the Peter Paul candy company? Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't.

Anyway, my dream someday is that someone will make a movie out of the book, but I might as well dream of winning the lottery and marrying Amber Heard because there's no way that could ever happen. It's an unfilmable book, since it involves a fully nude adult female victim and 5 underage kids interacting with her, not to mention raping and torturing her. No way they could ever pull that off without ruining it, unless they were to severely sanitize it like they did with The Girl Next Door.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 01:43:32 PM

Name: John Galt

Rihanna has a music video out for her song, S&M. Sticks and stones may break my bones but chains and whips excite me. Despite beginning with two guys dragging her into the room, the visuals are mostly femdom, plus a lot of stuff that has nothing to do with S&M but was probably just thrown in by people who were clueless. Trust me, Rihanna, eating a banana and licking an ice cream cone may be stand-by props for intimating sexual activity, but there is nothing S&M about them. At the 2:15 and again at the 2:50 marks you get brief glimpses of Rihanna on the floor in a hideously garish outfit with her wrists tied in front on her. (In front?!? I know, right?) But all in all, a Massive Fail for a video called S&M.

Oh, and you might enjoy the video more if you mute your speakers.

* * * * *

Ralphus: Mixing up "Peter" and "Paul" isn't that unusual. They are two of the biggest misogynists in early Christianity and most American Christians have most likely grown up conflating the two.

I also jumped to the Amazon page describing Let's Go Play at the Adams 2, anxious to see how anyone could write a sequel. From the description, it sounds like a sequel in name only. It "follows all the links left by Johnson"? A double murder in a national forest? Hmm. I will be interested in hearing a follow-up report from SharedJoy.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 02:06:08 PM

Name: YikYakker

Ralphus: Thanks for keeping the databases up-to-date. The Bamboo House of Dolls whipping scene is one of my favorites, although I can't really put my finger on why that is so. Maybe it's the combination of the clothes-ripping and the overall cruelty of the scene. Those are the sharpest images I've seen from that movie.


Speaking of clothes-ripping, I caught a good scene the other day from a movie called The Vampire Journals. A beautiful dark-haired woman in a flowing, gossamer gown is running down the hallway of a huge mansion. She almost makes it to the door when the vampire she is fleeing from catches her from behind and rips open the left half of her dress, from shoulder to waist. The scene is shot in about half-slo-mo. It's very nicely done and somebody out there read my mind.

The movie itself is average vampire stuff. But it does have a prevailing gothic mood and features some lovely naked vampire eurobabes.

Anyway, I just thought I'd mention that for the benefit of others who are similarly obsessed with the forceful and non-consensual rending of womens' garments.


John Galt: That Upcoming Nude Scenes site is a valuable service, and you provide a valuable service to us by keeping up with it.

BTW, I was able to play that mp4 clip from Territories using VLC Media Player. Except for a couple brief hiccups, it worked fine.


Michael Goi: Nice of you to drop in, we always enjoy visits and comments from folks who toil in the business of film-making.

I noticed on your Cinematography list (as provided by IMDb) that you also did a piece on the Atlanta "child murders" - which mostly involved boys and young men with minority backgrounds and/or disabilities. So in fairness, it's not as if you have completely ignored that aspect in your work.


I don't want to even get started on Natalee Holloway.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 02:36:52 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

YikYakker wrote:

The Bamboo House of Dolls whipping scene is one of my favorites, although I can't really put my finger on why that is so. Maybe it's the combination of the clothes-ripping and the overall cruelty of the scene. Those are the sharpest images I've seen from that movie.

Yeah, and with that in mind, John Galt recently updated his original review with even more stills. Check it out:

It's a very good review, made even better with the addition of pictures this time. Much more eye-catching to add pictures along with the text. If anybody wants to upgrade their previous reviews with caps, drop me an e-mail. John is in the midst of upgrading some of his older ones for the Reviews section. It's nice, because we could have never done the picture thing before back when we were on Tripod. I'm loving the freedom we have now.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 09:36:37 PM

Name: John Galt

YikYakker: Yeah, I managed to get it to play, but my video card couldn't keep up. My Linux system is kind of a bare-bones, older workstation and sometimes the hardware just isn't up to the task. It played fine (using VLC Media Player, of course) on my more up-to-date Windows workstation.

I will have to check out The Vampire Diaries. I hope that isn't the only decent scene in the whole movie?

At Ralphus' suggestion, I have been going back and illustrating some of my reviews in the Movie Reviews Database. Also registering them at IMDB. It is amusing, in a twisted and superior sort of way, to imagine someone being, um, surprised by the review's focus, but only because he or she was too dense to understand what a movie review might entail coming from a website called "Bring Out the GIMP (Girls in Merciless Peril)."

Anyway, I added some images to the Bamboo House of Dolls review I did, so you might check those out. I especially like the close-up of the sweat-covered breast and nipple. You just don't see fine cinematography like that any more.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 09:39:20 PM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: Excellent cross-post. We couldn't have done that better if we had planned it.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 09:41:45 PM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

Flor Salvaje is a Spanish soap opera on the Telemundo channel. Apparently from promos there's going to be bondage on it this week (to a guy and to a hot girl). It's on every weeknight so I don't know what day or days the bondage will happen. I don't speak Spanish but I once happened by the Telemundo channel while a soap was playing, and a dude slapped a girl (and they showed it, not like the pretend slap or hit of Minka Kelly on Charlie's Angels when they cut away at impact). So during the late summer, if nothing was on, I'd flip to Telemundo channel. One show had unwanted advances to a maid and attempted rape. Seen girls get slapped a number of times. Bondage every once in a while. Even when none of this is happening, the Latin actresses on these Spanish soaps can be pretty hot. Anyway, FYI.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 09:47:11 PM

Name: DHT

I don't know if you all knew about this site already or not, but it was new to me.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 10:21:54 PM

Name: A Canadian

Ralphus wrote:

If anybody wants to upgrade their previous reviews with caps, drop me an e-mail.

Count me in.

I'll send e-mails to Ralphus as I get to the caps. Of course, since some of the reviews of my favorite films are already on the lengthy side, I'll have to be conservative in the number of caps I create. But I do think adding pictures is a good idea.

Sunday, September 25th 2011 - 11:07:49 PM

Name: SharedJoy


Now that's a great pic of the best book cover ever. :)

(My hard-cover has a grey cover trying to look like crumpled paper, with the tip of one corner red to indicate blood, and no pic whatsoever.)

As I understand it, you can self-publish ANYTHING on Kindle, so long as the rights-owners don't complain. With Johnson dead, if no heirs or publishers exist (or care enough about the property to notice and make a fuss), then it's all good.

(Of course, if they do, Amazon has been known to delete already-sold copies of books from our devices and refund the money if WE complain, so it could theoretically vanish any second.)

(From the introduction, it appears this story was originally offered free, though now I paid $1 for it.)

"Let's Go Play at the Adams' 2" is about a detective solving several murders/missing people in the woods, 20 years after the first book, and is told completely from the detective's perspective. The bodies we start the story with (one male, one female), have been burned/mutilated in a fashion familiar to readers of the first book, and were "discovered" by a forest ranger named... Paul McVeigh.

I'm more skimming than properly reading, and am currently at the 50% mark. So far, I've found nothing of interest for Gimpers. Will keep you posted...

Monday, September 26th 2011 - 11:29:42 AM

Name: John Galt

Well, when I went to check out The Vampire Journals, I saw it was a Full Moon Production, which reminded me that I want to add illustrations to my Head of the Family review, but also that maybe I should do a quick review of another one of my All-Time Favorite Full Moon Flicks, Meridian, starring the luscious Sherilynn Fenn. It's mostly a roofie rape deal, and I would be lying if I said I wouldn't have liked it to go darker and with more violence, but it is what it is. So here it is, another oldie but goodie.

* * * * *

Meridian (1990)

This direct-to-video B-movie masterpiece from Charles Band's incredible Full Moon Productions is a cheesy but enjoyably atmospheric retelling of The Beauty and the Beast featuring the mesmerizingly beautiful Sherilynn Fenn. It also co-starred the equally beautiful and sexy Charlie Spradling (who is a girl, her name notwithstanding). This flick has Sherilynn Fenn being drugged and sort-of raped by a beast and also later being the victim of an attempted rape.

I will naturally concentrate on the rape scenes, but the story, in a nutshell, is that Sherilynn Fenn's character, Catherine, returns to her ancestral home with her friend, Gina (Charlie Spradling) in tow. Catherine is destined to relive the fate of her aunt, who was found brutally murdered while a band of gypsy performers was in town. Lo and behold, a band of gypsy performers shows up again and there's a curse on two brothers, one of whom is a devilishly handsome ladies' man and the other of whom turns into a hairy beast. Guess which one is the real monster.

Anyway, the devilishly handsome brother (and his circus freak compatriots) drugs the two girls about the 22:00 minute mark. He lifts Gina onto the table and rips open her blouse. Catherine tries to intervene, but he just pushes her away.
Catherine and Gina drugged
Catherine is carried by the devilishly handsome guy to a bedroom, where she is tossed onto the bed, drugged and woozy, but still conscious. He strips her naked, and sadly she does not fight him. But isn't that what a good roofie is supposed to do? He looks longingly at her, like he really wants to just fuck the hell out of her right now, but instead walks out and tells a masked and hooded figure in the hall, "She's all yours."
Catherine on the bed
Catherine stripped naked
The masked and hooded figure takes off the hood and mask and it's the other brother--an identical twin. He goes into the room and does fuck the drugged Catherine, turning into the hairy beast during coitus. It makes for a nice visual.
Catherine fucked by the Beast
The devilishly handsome brother, meanwhile, returns to the dining room, gropes the drugged Gina, strips her naked, roughly pushes her back onto a settee, and fucks her.
Gina fucked by the Other Brother
Neither scene involves any force, nor do the girls fight back. But they are drugged, after all, which counts as rape in the legal sense, if not the nonconsensual, hold her down while she is fighting back and screaming and brutally fuck her against her will sense.

At the 51:00 minute mark, the devilishly handsome brother attacks Catherine in a bedroom. He pushes her onto a bed and tries to kiss her but she bites him. He slaps her silly and binds one of her wrists to the headboard. Then he rips open her blouse to reveal her breasts and is just about to get down to business when the beast shows up and rescues her. So there's an attempted rape with light bondage and topless nudity.
Catherine's attempted rape
That's about it. There's a dream sequence about 56:00 minutes in where Catherine and the beast are having a tender moment, but there's no GIMPness.

SUMMARY: Catherine and Gina are drugged and fucked. Catherine by a guy who turns into a hairy beast halfway through, Gina by the beast's good-looking but evil brother. Later, Catherine is slapped silly, has one wrist tied to a headboard, and has her blouse torn open to reveal her breasts in preparation for a rape but she is rescued. So, two instances of roofied date rape and an attempted real rape.

This is a classic B-movie (as many of the Full Moon productions were) that retells The Beauty and the Beast with sex and nudity. The GIMP factor, regrettably, is low, because the most exciting GIMP rapes involve fully conscious fighting-back victims and our rape victims were drugged into compliancy. The attempted rape, however, started off really well, with violence, light bondage, and nudity, so that was all to the good. Plus: Sherilynn Fenn and Charlie Spradling. I give this a solid C+ for GIMP.

Meridian is available from Amazon in a 4-movie set entitled The Charles Band DVD Collection, Vol 1, which also includes Head of the Family(!) for $49.95. In case you aren't aware of the significance of that, read my review of Head of the Family, which has an incredible BATS scene with a completely naked and AOH bound Jacqueline Lovell (Sara St James). If all you want (or need) is Meridian, it is available on a two-fer DVD for only $9.99, but the comments indicate it isn't a very quality version.

Monday, September 26th 2011 - 07:29:55 PM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: Nice job on the review of Meridian. It doesn't sound like much of a movie, but I'll still be making repeat visits to your review and those nude pix of Sherilynn Fenn.

Monday, September 26th 2011 - 09:54:35 PM

Name: John Galt

A Canadian: I also illustrated my Head of the Family review with lots of Jacqueline Lovell (Sara St James) pics. Ah, so many beautiful women.

Monday, September 26th 2011 - 10:14:43 PM

Name: YikYakker

John Galt: After reading your fine review of Meridian, all I can say is...good lord! Sherilynn Fenn and Charlie Spradling both getting their blouses torn open! I gotta see this one.

And thanks for hunting down some sources for it.

Nice caps too.

You asked [about Vampire Journals]:

I hope that isn't the only decent scene in the whole movie?

Well, to be honest, I skimmed through the movie hoping to quickly ferret out the GIMP scenes, but I don't recall anything that measured up to this one. Fortunately, it occurs immediately after the opening credits, so anyone who is not particularly interested in vampire movies can skip the rest without missing much. I should really go back and give it more thorough look to make sure nothing has been ignored.

The lovely victim is played by Rodica Lupu, who hasn't made another movie since. *sigh* BTW, the movie was made in Romania, which probably lends a lot to the ambience. The plot concerns a male reformed vampire who is a vampire slayer. It came out in 1997, the same year we saw the appearance of a similar character, Angel, in the Buffy the Vampire Slayer TV series. But this fellow's modus operandi is to chop vampires' heads off with a sword.


Ralphus wrote:

If anybody wants to upgrade their previous reviews with caps, drop me an e-mail.

I would be keenly interested in doing that. But first, I need to take care of the backlog of future reviews I have already committed to. Then I'll turn my attention to the earlier ones.

Monday, September 26th 2011 - 10:47:22 PM

Name: YikYakker seems I've got this board all to myself. In that case, here is my contribution to Babysitters in Bondage Week...Christina Applegate as Kelly Bundy.

Tuesday, September 27th 2011 - 07:14:55 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Catching up on recent activity...

DHT: DamselTube, huh? Definitely new to me, too, nice find. Looks like various clips from bondage producers, most of which I've not familiar with. I'll check it out more thoroughly when I find some time.

I have to say that the featured video on the page, with the 3 girls being gagged with socks, is one of the funniest things I've seen in a long time. I'm not sure if it was intentionally bad, or maybe somebody with a sock fetish might find it arousing, but I thought it was impossible to watch without laughing. That might explain why Anton has hundreds of videos on their site if they're cranking out stuff like this left and right.


Scribbler: From what I understand, Telemundo used to have even more bondage in their soap operas than they do now. A friend of mine says they've toned it down in recent years. If you search YouTube, you'll probably find a lot more. A lot of times the bondage isn't that severe, but you're right, those Latin actresses are often quite hot. I would subscribe to those foreign channels if they were available here, just for the chance to check out what they're offering.


SharedJoy: Ah, so a grown-up Paul McVeigh is now a forest ranger who discovered Barbara's body, huh? That actually sounds interesting, if you're reading it strictly to see how the story unfolds. I know one of the complaints that a lot of people had about "Let's Go Play At the Adams'" was that the kids all got away with it at the end. Maybe when Paul gets arrested in the sequel (you know it's going to happen) he'll give a first-person description of what he and the others did when he confesses. That might be worth the $1 price, you think?


John Galt: Another nice review, thank you. Your review is in my Homepage URL above. I saw Meridian, mostly in fast-forward, years ago when it came out, hoping for something good. As much I loved seeing both Charlie Spradling (schwing!) and Sherilyn Fenn (double schwing!) naked, a couple of drugged, non-forceful "rapes" with no bondage didn't really do it for me. After seeing her in "Twin Peaks" where she got bound, gagged, injected with heroin and forced to make a kidnap video, I was hoping that Sherilyn Fenn would have a GIMP-worthy career. That never really materialized, unless you count the film where she gets her arms and legs cut off and she's kept in a box in Boxing Helena. That was actually a pretty good film, although obviously, not for every taste.

Here's a few stills from her Twin Peaks scenes:

Tuesday, September 27th 2011 - 07:32:19 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

I see the titles available at Video Mayhem include a long list of resurfaced Attackers movies that appeared to have been lost forever, such as Attackers JBD-066. The original Slave Island movies are also back. I have to believe a "search" function on the site can't be far behind.

Meanwhile, Larry's list of new titles for September includes a movie that my research has determined is very difficult to get on disc in North America. Which film is that? Well, at this point, I'm not prepared to say -- you'll have to wait a few weeks until I'm able to get around to a review. But if you know your Japanese porn stars, my one clue for today is search for the film that stars one of Japan's most popular ladies (Yuma).

Tuesday, September 27th 2011 - 08:36:21 PM

Name: John Galt

Since I seem to be revisiting a lot of my favorite cult classic flicks from the 80s and 90s, this one naturally came to mind. There is a brief mention of it in the soon-to-return Rape Database, but I think it deserves its own little review page. Especially with illustration goodness.

* * * * *

Re-Animator (1985)

You know how you'll be watching a movie, and find yourself thinking how much better you would have done it? I know we all do that with GIMP movies. We'll see someone tie a girl's hands in front of her and we'll think how stupid that is. Or we'll watch a rape where the victim's clothes are all still apparently on, and we'll think WTF? Well, it is not much of an exaggeration to say that Stuart Gordon's Re-Animator is how a horror movie should be done. It hits all of its marks perfectly. Not only is it one of the funniest scary movies ever, it is bloody, gory, spooky, creepy, suspenseful, and sexy. And the actors are all superb.

Its claim to fame, though, is its sexual assault scene. Which is what I am going to spend all my time describing, with helpful pictures to illustrate its sublime awesomeness.

First, though, the story in a nutshell. Re-Animator is loosely based on an HP Lovecraft story. The movie deals with Herbert West, a youthful mad scientist obsessed with bringing the dead back to life. He runs afoul of Dr Hill, his egotistical instructor at university. There's also West's roommate, who is dating the dean's pretty daughter, played by an innocent and vulnerable-looking Barbara Crampton. And of course the egotistical Dr Hill also lusts after the dean's pretty daughter, because Barbara Crampton is also smoking hot. West perfects his formula, Dr Hill tries to steal it, and there is mayhem and death and re-animation galore. I won't spoil the plot, which is clever and twisted, but I will spoil the sexual assault scene.

The dean is turned into a mindless zombie-like creature by the re-animation formula. When Dr Hill and West have their showdown, West ends up decapitating Dr Hill, and then re-animating the head and body separately, which leads to Dr Hill's body escaping with his head. Dr Hill's head sends the mindless dean out to fetch his pretty daughter. The dean returns with his unconscious daughter and lays her in the lab table.
The dean fetches his daughter
The dean strips his daughter naked.  Watch carefully as he rips her panties off in a quick blur, accompanied by a ripping sound.
The dean strips his daughter naked
The dean fastens his daughter's wrists and ankles to the table with leather restraints, although he fails to fasten one wrist securely.
The dean fastens his naked daughter to the lab table
The daughter wakes up and sees she is naked, fastened to a laboratory table, with her zombie father and the headless body of Dr Hill standing over her and the head of Dr Hill in a tray next to her. She freaks out. Dr Hill has his body lift his head up so he can tell the dean's daughter how he has always been in love with her and then proceeds to lick her ear, suck one of her nipples, and move down her bound, helpless body.
The dean's naked daughter is licked and sucked
Seeing as how he is a disembodied head, he cannot fuck her, so he does the next best thing: He has his body push his face down between her legs so he can eat her out.  That is so genius.
The dean's naked daughter gets head
Just before he starts munching, though, West reappears and distracts him long enough for his roommate to free her. The movie builds to a fascinatingly bloody and gory finale. It is a magnificent horror movie in its own right, but that's it for GIMP. There's a part of me that wanted that scene to last longer and go farther, but actually it was just explicit enough and just long enough to blow my mind.

SUMMARY: The dean's pretty young daughter (Barbara Crampton) is kidnapped, rendered unconscious, stripped naked, bound to a laboratory table with leather restraints, has her ear and nipple licked by a disembodied head and is a hair away from being eaten out before she is rescued. Insert your "getting head" joke here. This scene is an A for GIMPness. It belongs on every compilation disc.

Barbara Crampton also has a nude scene or two (counting the R-rated stuff mentioned below), but there is no GIMP.

You can buy Re-Animator from Amazon for $5.81 right now. This is the version I have, which is the Un-rated version, but including the R-rated version scenes as extras. The R-rated version is longer, but is missing some of the more explicit scenes. So be sure to get the Un-rated version, or the Un-rated version that contains the R-rated scenes as extras.

Wednesday, September 28th 2011 - 01:41:51 AM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

Speaking of Charlie Spradling, I wish that she had been [un]dressed like this when she was so nicely beaten in "Angel of Destruction"! (I also wish the bad guy had raped her and strangled her with the phone cord -- instead, she gets her neck snapped.

Wednesday, September 28th 2011 - 03:35:05 AM

Name: Sloth

John Galt - for some reason "Re-Animator" is one of those flicks I just never got around to seeing - but my word, an unconscious chemise clad Barbara Crampton carried to a surgical table to be strapped in and fondled by a disembodied head - too much - that goes on the to see list - thanks so much.

Wednesday, September 28th 2011 - 10:13:48 AM

Name: YikYakker

Sloth wrote:

...for some reason Re-Animator is one of those flicks I just never got around to seeing.

Same here. I've seen a clip of the GIMP part, but it did not include the beginning of the scene, which features some stripping and ripping action, according to John Galt's review. This is extra incentive to check it out.

John Galt: There is much to appreciate about your review including the fine detail, the excellent caps and the truly valuable service you provide by researching the availability, cost and versions of the movie. That Amazon price is just the thing for topping off one's "shopping cart" to get free shipping.


TV Alert: The trailer for the Thursday night episode of CW's Vampire Diaries shows the cheerleader-turned-vampire character played by Candice Accola (Deadgirl) in peril. She's strapped to a chair in a dungeon-like basement setting, wearing a slinky LBD (or is it a slip?) and looking very hot.

Could be a disappointment, could be a classic, who knows. But it's always a welcome sight when TV shows add a little spark to a bondage scene.

BTW, I've added that show's stunning leading lady, Nina Dobrev, to my favorite-dark-haired-babe list, with the status of "future ex-trophy-wife".


jhlipton: Like you, I was disappointed in Charlie Spradling's quick exit from Angel of Destruction.

A potential improvement would have been for the bad guy to knock Charlie unconscious, drag her to the back of the building, swing his car around back and stuff her in his trunk for later amusements.

I began to lose interest in the movie soon after her demise, and still haven't seen it all the way through.

Wednesday, September 28th 2011 - 06:13:28 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: You've certainly been a reviewing roll lately. Another fine review; check my Homepage URL for your direct link.

Re-Animator not only has a great bondage near-rape scene, it's a damn fine horror film in its own right. One of my real favorites, just a very entertaining film from beginning to end. My DVD copy has been AWOL for a few years (I strongly suspect one of my ex-friends stole it) so the fact that I can get a new one for less than 6 bucks is good news. Guys, if you haven't seen this movie, go find it and watch it. You won't regret it, it's a lot of fun.

In fact, if you're looking for tied-up women, you couldn't go wrong with many of director Stuart Gordon's other films, either. I've brought this up on the forum before, but his track record for making films with bondage scenes is uncanny...check out his body of work. Besides Re-Animator, you've got:

  • Barbara Crampton tied up again (twice) including a near electro-torture scene in From Beyond

  • Then there's Daughter of Darkness, which I haven't seen, but Brian's Page says Mia Sara and others are tied up

  • Can't forget the classic The Pit and the Pendulum with its great rack scene

  • Also Fortress, where a woman is strapped to an operating table (also haven't seen this one)

  • Castle Freak (another chick in bondage)

  • Space Truckers (Debi Mazar tied AOH)

  • And finally Dagon (nude woman suspended by her wrists and lowered into...well, you've got to watch it)

    According to his IMDB page, Gordon hasn't directed a film for 3 years. This is a man we need to get working! He clearly has our best interests at heart. Wouldn't surprise me if he's a closet reader of this forum.

  • Wednesday, September 28th 2011 - 08:51:05 PM

    Name: A Canadian

    Ralphus wrote:

    John Galt: You've certainly been a reviewing roll lately. Another fine review.

    I agree. And I'm definitely enjoying the quality caps you're putting into your reviews. The pictures really do strengthen the reviews.

    Wednesday, September 28th 2011 - 09:37:46 PM

    Name: John Galt

    Sloth, jhlipton, YikYakker, A Canadian, and Ralphus: Thanks for reading and commenting on my review. I guess if a picture is worth a thousand words, that will really cut down a bit on the infamous length of my comments. I also went back and added some pictures to my reviews of Breeders and Inseminoid, although--fair warning--I did not remove any words.

    I like pictures in reviews and on the forum in general as well. YikYakker's pictures of Candice Accola from the Vampire Diaries teaser makes all the difference between an informative post and an eye-catching informative post. I wish it was easier for everyone to host and post images and we might see it a lot more.

    Wednesday, September 28th 2011 - 10:50:57 PM

    Name: jera cu
    E-mail address:

    Where can I view full movies of the whipped women? It is no longer available at Youtube. thanks.

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 04:10:35 AM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    jera cu: Where can I view full movies of the whipped women? It is no longer available at Youtube. thanks.

    I know I'm going to get the usual response of "How dare they charge for something that used to be free???!!!", but DarkFetishNet (see link above) has a lot of good whipping clips, both mainstream and "fetish". It's about $5 per month, or $50 per year, which is not too bad for so many clips.

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 10:00:33 AM

    Name: Eda
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    I hadn't realized just how long it had been since I'd last posted, but now I see that I've just been enjoying the posts of others and not contributing myself for a bit too long. And enjoying is exactly the right word.

    So what has roused me from my slumber? Why Ralphus, of course. To agree and disagree with his recent comments about two scenes.

    First the "disagree" part. Unlike Ralphus, I found the rack scene in PIT AND THE PENDULUM to be extremely disappointing. Here is a film that has a great scene of the absolutely stunning Rona De Ricci (and isn't it a shame she didn't appear in more films?) being forced to strip in front of her inquisitors, yet, when we next see her on the rack ... her torturers have put her clothes back on !! When does that ever happen to a victim? "Witch, we're going to torture you now, so, here, put your clothes back on !!" Can anyone tell me how that makes sense in the slightest? Imagine that scene with her wearing what she was wearing in the previous scene -- nothing. Have I got this right or does Ralphus?

    Now the "agree" part, though. I think that the scene in DAGON is one of the hottest I've seen. Beautiful actress. Horrific setting with an angry and bloodthirsty crowd watching. A frantic and struggling woman (whose clothes are not put back on !!). And just when it appears that she may be rescued ... sorry, you're too late, Mr. Hero. Unlike the De Ricci scene, this one exceeds expectations, and I think that Ralphus and I both have this one right.

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 10:17:25 AM

    Name: carnyx
    E-mail address:

    I know it's not much, but i really liked it. Last nite on "Modern Family" gorgeous Julie Bowen got her hands tied behind her back by a security guard. Take care. Robert

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 01:39:38 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Last night Criminal Minds episode had 3 very horrifying GIMP scenes (only few seconds long) were 3 young girls bound to a chair and the first girl tortured by pouring battery acid in their forced open eyes, the second pouring battery acid into her forced open mouth and the last one forced her hands into bowls of battery acid. Not something you see on TV ever often that intense and terrifying so thought post it. There some TV shows you can see episode rerun on their website so maybe Gimpers can see it there. Bill K.

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 02:50:25 PM

    Name: Sloth
    Homepage URL:

    A Canadian - hey, just noticed your post on the stuff over at Video Mayhem - am going through the archive section in search of a few diamonds in the rough - and I understand the attraction to your latest squeeze - does this mean the end of your relationship with Maria?

    Bill K - a Gimper can do far worse than tuning into "Criminal Minds" - don't recall the title but thus far my fave episode concerned a taxi driver offing his victims because they smelled right - holding them and eventually lowering their naked bodies into a chemical bath of some sort while strapped to a clear platform - outstanding.

    YikYakker - at the above link that scene from "Re-Animator" seems to be available - the poster advertises it as the uncut version but I've not viewed it myself yet.

    Eda - for all the reasons you listed I concur with your assessment of the rack scene from "Pit and the Pendulum" - ditto your assessment on "Dagon" - the lady is drop dead gorgeous and absolutely sells that scene - probably not that difficult surrounded by chanting fish faces - that scene is always an instant stiffy - one day I hope to discover what it was with Lovecraft and his fascination with tentacled creatures whether they be land, sea or air.

    Stay well all

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 03:30:05 PM

    Name: A Canadian

    Sloth wrote:

    I understand the attraction to your latest squeeze - does this mean the end of your relationship with Maria?

    Maria who?

    Yuma Asami doesn't have tattoos and she can act. I'm smitten.

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 06:55:03 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    Eda wrote:

    Unlike Ralphus, I found the rack scene in PIT AND THE PENDULUM to be extremely disappointing. Here is a film that has a great scene of the absolutely stunning Rona De Ricci (and isn't it a shame she didn't appear in more films?) being forced to strip in front of her inquisitors...

    Hmmm...are you talking about this scene?

    Ah, what an easy excuse to show Rona De Ricci naked. Like I needed a reason.

    ...yet, when we next see her on the rack ... her torturers have put her clothes back on !! When does that ever happen to a victim? "Witch, we're going to torture you now, so, here, put your clothes back on !!" Can anyone tell me how that makes sense in the slightest? Imagine that scene with her wearing what she was wearing in the previous scene -- nothing. Have I got this right or does Ralphus?

    Well, that's not totally accurate. After she has her clothes removed for them to search for the witch's mark, when we see her next, she's been given clothes and thrown into a cell for the night. The torture rack scene occurs the next day, and yeah, she's still wearing the clothes they gave her the previous night.

    Still, point taken. In a perfect world, or at least in a perfect movie, she would be kept totally naked for the rest of the film. Especially in this case, because they gave us full-frontal eye candy earlier in the film. And rack scenes are kind of silly with clothes. You don't give her any kind of dignity by allowing her to wear clothes while being tortured. The idea is to break her, and frankly, to enjoy watching her suffer while doing so. So why deny yourself that pleasure when you're in charge?

    Hey, can't have everything. I thought The Pit and the Pendulum had great potential but Rona was mostly wasted. Plus that, the movie had not one but 2 burnings at the stake, one with an ugly woman who's already dead, and the other with the old hag. Hey guys, what about the cute naked chick? Burn her!

    Anyway, here's the rack scene with Rona De Ricci. I liked it, but I agree, naked would have been better.

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 08:20:46 PM

    Name: John Galt
    Homepage URL:

    Actually, Sloth's link took me to Part 7 of Re-Animator. The kidnap, strip, bondage, attempted rape happens at the very beginning of Part 8, which I helpfully included in the Homepage URL above. It looks complete to me.

    Thursday, September 29th 2011 - 08:44:12 PM

    Name: YikYakker
    Homepage URL:>1=28103

    Eda: I agree with you and Ralphus about Dagon. This movie starts out a bit slowly (in fact I almost gave up on it) but draws you in and builds to a frenzy. The suspension scene over the monster pit is an exciting climax. Raquel Merono is appropriately naked because...well, what monster wants to be fed a victim with her clothes on? The purpose of the dripping blood is to attract the monster to the surface.

    As for Pit and the Pendulum, this is one I have not yet seen except for clips of the two scenes you mentioned. Taken separately, they are each fine in their own right, although any rack scene is better with a naked victim. But put in context as you have done, I would agree that it does not make sense to put a victim's clothing back on (unless one has my perversion, and wants to continually put the clothes on, rip them off, put them on, rip them off, etc.).


    Ralphus wrote: [Stuart Gordon's] track record for making films with bondage scenes is uncanny...check out his body of work.

    Maybe we should have a special award for the man - like Lifetime Achievement for GIMPage in Mainstream Horror Films.;)

    Besides the above-mentioned Dagon, I've also seen From Beyond and Castle Freak. I'd meant to review Castle Freak, but somehow it slipped downward on my list; now I can't even remember what GIMPage was included. I'll just have to watch it again.


    The bondage scene on last night's Vampire Diaries was pretty decent for network TV. Candice Accola is bound to a sturdy chair with iron clasps that fasten around her wrists and ankles. The torture takes the form of a hinged metal "window" that her tormenter temporarily opens to expose her to sunlight, thus burning her flesh, mainly around the upper back, shoulders and upper arms because of the angle. This is done repeatedly in an effort to force the vampirette to make a decision that she refuses to make. Naturally she is rescued, but not before suffering a major sunburn. I thought Candice Accola did a fine job of conveying agony and distress. The scene is occasionally interrupted by cutaways to another plot development. The title of this episode is "The End of the Affair".


    Homepage URL: I guess we should not be surprised about these developments regarding the new TV show, The Playboy Club, which we were just discussing a short while back.


    The YouTube links to Re-Animator supplied by both Sloth and John Galt are worth a look. The end of Part 7 gives you some idea of the plot and shows Barbara Crampton getting captured. The beginning of Part 8 is the money shot with Crampton naked and molested by a disembodied head. Thanks, guys.

    YouTube has the whole movie for free, in sections, but you'd better catch it in a hurry before the censors figure out what's going on.

    Friday, September 30th 2011 - 09:37:01 AM

    Name: YikYakker

    Today's Pic: Notice that the young GIMPer removed her shoes and tied her ankles high on the chair leg so that she has to resort to pointing her toes downward to brace herself for each swat. Kid learned fast.

    Friday, September 30th 2011 - 07:42:36 PM

    Previous - August 2011

    Next - October 2011