Previous - September 2011

Next - November 2011


October 2011

Name: Bill K.
Homepage URL:

Ralphus / guys why does the female child have adult CC or DD cup size cleavage / breasts? Very strange kids indeed. Bill K.

Saturday, October 1st 2011 - 12:38:01 AM

Name: Scrib-blurr

In my artistic endeavors, I too have drawn naked or near naked adult-age babysitters victimized by fully clothed younger humans (or maybe they're midgets!). Never posted them though. For fears of the CP police.

Saturday, October 1st 2011 - 03:36:17 AM

Name: John Galt

I was going through my DVDs and happened to see this one and remembered that it had a hot blond almost naked chick bound upside down and tape gagged and thought: Hey, maybe I should do a quick review on this one. With vidcaps, unfortunately, nothing is ever quick any more, but here is a review with pictures, accompanied by a some words for those who insist that they also read the articles.

* * * * *

Rise: Blood Hunter (2007)

I bought this DVD because it featured Lucy Lui naked. That was the extent of my expectations, although I hoped since it was a vampire movie maybe there would be some sex-and-violence action. It met my minimum expectations.

In a nutshell, what happens is this: Lucy Lui plays intrepid investigative reporter Sadie Blake, who stumbles onto a society of vampires. They kidnap her and turn her into a vampire, giving her what they consider to be the gift of immortality. She is the very epitome of ungrateful and tracks them down and kills them. Well, the head one anyway, although there is collateral damage. As is my new normal review method, I will mainly be hitting the GIMP bits, because that's why you're reading this after all.

The movie starts out incredibly well, but sadly goes downhill. We are in a bar and pretty blond Collette (Cameron Richardson) tries to get a guy to pay her for sex. Sadie walks in, busts the guy for being married, and tells Collette that she would like to take her home instead. She lays out five $100 bills. They drive back to a mansion and go upstairs to the bedroom. Sadie commands Collette to strip all the way, but Collette only gets down to her panties, garter belt and nylons. Sadie tells her to wash her hands, and that the soap is in the shower. When Collette picks up the soap, it triggers the heavy shower head to fall and knocks her out.
Collette strips

Collette is hanging upside down in the shower, hands bound behind her back, ankles tied together, with tape over her mouth. A creepy old guy rolls up in a wheelchair and eyes upside down and almost naked Collette and tells Sadie she did well. Sadie asks for "the address," the guy puts her off, she insists, the guy gives her an address and Sadie walks out. The guy sits there watching Collette struggle.
Collette hanging upside down

Sadie walks back in and shoots the guy with a small crossbow. She releases the girl, tells her to find another line of work and never to tell anyone what happened to her. Like that's going to happen.

There's a lot of jumping back and forth in this movie, and the next good scene we get is Sadie, waking up dead in the morgue. Here's our first Lucy Lui nudity, although it could have been more revealing. She wakes up in a morgue drawer and kicks her way out.
Sadie wakes up dead

Our next good sequence of events tells the tale of Sadie's demise. She is kidnapped, hands bound behind her back, and tossed into a back seat. She is taken to the mansion we saw in the opening GIMP scene. She is plopped down in a chair and questioned. Her answers are found wanting.
Sadie bound and kidnapped

She is taken upstairs and plopped down on a plastic covered bed. Nothing good will happen to you when you find yourself on a plastic covered bed. You can take that to the bank. Sure enough, the bad guy, Bishop, and his girlfriend-or-wife, fellow vampire Eve (played by the sexy Carla Gugino, who does not get naked at all, much to my disappointment) surround sexy Sadie and try to tell her this is going to be a good thing. Sadie is unconvinced. Bishop hits her, knocking her back on the bed and stunning her. Bishop can't decide whether he wants to kill her first or fuck her first. Eve says kill her. Bishop takes a small knife and slices her jugular. They hold her down as Sadie screams and thrashes her feet, until she loses strength. Then they drink her blood.

By the way, just as an aside, although it is probably not visible, Sadie's face is covered in sweat in that first picture below, which is so hot. I love sweat-covered helpless soon-to-be victims.
Sadie is held down and bled

Bishop undresses her and fucks her, although we don't get to see anything. Eve takes her turn with Sadie as well, which provides us with our only nudity in this entire scene. And that's just a blood-covered boob.
Sadie undressed and fucked

Stuff happens. Sadie crosses paths with a detective who doesn't know what to make of her but to show he's a Real Man, he shoots her in the back. Twice. Because cops masquerading as Real Men shoot unarmed women in the back. To show he's sorry he ends up removing the bullets and then handcuffing her to the bed. What a guy. (I didn't much like this character, if that's not clear.)
Sadie handcuffed to the bed

When Sadie finally convinces him that she will lead him to Bishop (where the detective expects to find his daughter, in a subplot that is fairly boring), he lets her go. They go to the warehouse where Bishop is. There are naked people hanging upside down in this place. Foreshadowing, no doubt, as Sadie ends up naked and hanging upside down in a poorly lighted but nonetheless nice GIMP scene. Bishop talks to her briefly, then positions a bowl underneath her and slashes her jugular again. He walks away as she bleeds out.
Sadie naked and upside down

The detective finds her. We still don't get to see a full-length upside down nude shot of Sadie, but there's a nice bit or two as he cuts her hands free and they fall down, then he lifts her bound feet off of a hook and lays her down. Then he covers her up. Damn.
Sadie is rescued

That's it for nudity and GIMP. The movie plays out as Bishop gets his and Sadie kicks her way out of a morgue drawer. Again.

SUMMARY: Pretty blond Collette strips topless, is bonked on the head and wakes up bound hands behind her back, upside down, and tape gagged, but she is eventually released. Sadie is kidnapped, hands bound behind her back, stunned by a blow to the head, has her throat cut and two vampires take turns drinking her. Then she is undressed (we don't see anything) and fucked in a shot so brief and unsatisfying that it did not even rate a vidcap. She is handcuffed to a bed. She is hung naked and bound upside down and her throat is slashed once again, but she is rescued in a scene notable for showing more of her bondage and nudity.

This movie is not bad, although it is notable for starring a lot of "name' actors and actresses who sleepwalk through their roles. It features extraordinary GIMP set ups but does not deliver. Hot naked gagged blond hanging upside down? Awesome. Then she's released without being whipped or anything? Letdown. Hot Asian chick on a plastic covered bed surrounded by two good-looking vampires, one of whom can't decide whether to kill her and then fuck her or fuck her and then kill her? Sweet. Brief glimpses alternating with blackouts, close-ups of just her face, hand and feet, but no full-length shots? Epic Fail. Shots of her clothes being removed and then getting fucked? I love the concept. No nudity and no actual shot of her getting fucked? I am disappointed in the execution. Hot Asian chick hanging naked, bound and upside down? Who could not love that? Poorly lighted scene with no full-length shot and nothing of consequence happens to her? I hate that. This gets a D+ GIMP rating. Nice set-up, hot chicks, but poor lighting and no follow-through.

This is the "Unrated, Undead" version of the movie, but I am so unimpressed that I refuse to watch the "Rated, Dead" version to highlight the differences. Probably nudity and bondage, since there was no sex to speak of in this version and I can't imagine they would add that to the "Rated" version. You can find this on Amazon for $9.99.

Saturday, October 1st 2011 - 03:51:28 PM

Name: YikYakker

John Galt: It's true that a picture is worth a thousand words, but sometimes your words are worth a thousand pictures.

I dunno, I think Rise: Blood Hunter may be worth a look just on the basis of the topless inverted chicks alone. You just don't see enough of that in movies anymore.

Also, that Amazon site you linked us to shows some sources of used copies for as low as 77 cents. That's something else you don't come across very often.

Thanks for the detailed review and caps.


I haven't decided if Today's Pic is showing the kid's older sister dressed up like a maid, or if it is, in fact, the maid.

In any case, the plump babysitter is sweating next to the fireplace on what looks like the kind of cart hotels use when you order dinner from room service.

So I'm guessing they intend to cook and eat her.

Nice fall colors in the picture.


I thought Barbara Crampton did a fine job in the Re-Animator scene, As I watched I couldn't help thinking: You just don't see that many movies showing women strapped to operating tables anymore. There must be one or two hundred scenes like this in older movies (not as many with the nudity, of course).

I'm wondering whether anyone else out there likes mad-scientist-with-captive-woman-bound-to-operating-table scenes. If so, what are your favorites?

Here's one that I like, from Mill of the Stone Women.

The movie was made in the chaste, ancient 1960s. But it was made in Europe, and if you look closely, you'll catch a nice nip slip about 14 seconds into it. The heavy breathing is cool too.

Saturday, October 1st 2011 - 05:37:12 PM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: Excellent work on the review and caps of Rise: Blood Hunter. My memory is a joke these days but I'm thinking the key Lucy Liu clip must have been on the old YouTied site. I know I've seen that part, even though I'm pretty confident I've never seen the full movie -- nothing else in your review sounds familiar. Given that I think I've seen the only part that interests me, I'll probably give this film a miss.

Saturday, October 1st 2011 - 07:42:52 PM

Name: mothbrad

John Galt, there's plenty of times when I'm sure that your reviews (with pics) are more entertaining than the films they're reviewing. Please keep it up :)

Sunday, October 2nd 2011 - 04:38:03 AM

Name: BP

Re - Picture of Day.

Some call them pigtails,,,,,,,,,,,

Some call them Blow Job Handles,,,,,,,

Sunday, October 2nd 2011 - 05:03:54 AM

Name: YikYakker

Today's Pic: I guess if one had a sister who looked like that, one might be tempted to tie her up...and then charge the other guys in the neighborhood a fee to come and gape at her.

Now I will most assuredly go to hell.


Anything that even remotely suggests female weakness is subject to condemnation. Yet men are continually depicted as lazy, sex-obsessed, helpless slobs whose main function in entertainment is to provoke laughs by getting kicked in the groin, and there is no backlash. WTF.


Last night I watched the first 15 minutes or so of My Bloody Valentine. A young man is hit so hard in the back of his head with a pick axe that it pops one of his eyeballs out.

Then a girl has a shovel rammed into her mouth with enough force to separate the top part of her head from the rest of her body.

But I guess that's OK to show on TV because she wasn't naked or wearing lingerie.

Sunday, October 2nd 2011 - 10:59:17 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Thanks for taking the time to review Rise: Blood Hunter. I've not seen the movie, but earlier this year, our friend Gonzaullas posted one of the upside-down scenes from the movie. Here it is again:

If you search Hank Hobbs' Yahoo group, you'll likely find some better quality download clips and stills from the movie, too.

I have to say, I'm a little surprised to see such a low grade, especially for a mainstream film with 2 naked upside-down bondage scenes. I mean, how often do you get even one naked upside-down bondage scene in a movie, period? Yeah, the scenes didn't go as far as we would have liked, but isn't that typical? Most mainstream scenes never go as far as I would like, but then if they did, they would likely be hardcore bondage films, wouldn't they? I totally understand your justification, though.

As always, your review link is in my Homepage URL above.


YikYakker: The past few links you've brought up lately are very interesting to me. I'm talking about the women's group wanting to ban the Gisele Bündchen commercial (which was clever, I thought) and the earlier one about the conservative group trying to get "The Playboy Club" canceled because it's degrading to women. That's such crap. Have we become so politically correct that we can't see the forest for the trees? Number one, women ARE sex objects. Pretty women are used to sell everything in the media...books, magazines, movies, commercials, even the news. How do you think Fox News suckers so many men into watching their right-wing hate speech propaganda...they do it with the allure of beautiful women "newscasters".

Number two, objectifying women is a good thing. It's a good thing for both men and for women. I'm not a male chauvinist pig, and I believe in women's rights and all that. But I also realize it's a woman's world. Female models make much more than male models do, and that's as it should be. If you're a pretty woman, you can make a LOT of money in this country. Men will pay to see you do just about anything. Things like Playboy and other forms of porn are empowering to women. We like it, and they like getting paid for it. When people come to realize that women are different from men and play different roles in society, this world will be a better place to live in.

Sunday, October 2nd 2011 - 02:27:26 PM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: Perversely, I tend to grade movies lower when they have such great potential but absolutely fail to deliver. Rise: Blood Hunter had three stand-out set-ups that, in my opinion, went nowhere. The two upside down girls, for example--which was a sensational visual--did not even really struggle all that much. The blond did, a little, but Lucy Lui did not struggle at all. Even if all you're going to do is suspend a half-naked gal upside down, the very least you could do is have her actively struggle. And if that's all you're going to do, at least spend some time on that. Run the camera up and down her twisting, sweat-covered torso. Do some close-ups.

And don't even get me started on how much better the bed scene could have been with some sex and nudity thrown into the mix. And maybe even some Carla Gugino nudity as well. It's not like Carla Gugino is a stranger to nude scenes. That could have been mind-blowing.

I do realize I am harder on movies that go halfway and then don't deliver than I am on movies that might not go as far but pay off as far as they go. That's why I try very hard to describe the scenes--and now with vidcaps, capture the visual--as well as possible so that readers can look at the pictures and think: I don't know what the hell his problem is, that looks damn hot to me!

* * * * *

Concerning the YikYakker news topics, my ever-developing sense of social history leads me to believe that the attacks on sexy women in the media and even for attacks on pornography in general are actually attacks on women. I haven't taken any women's studies courses (and frankly I'm not sure I could stand to, because in many cases I think they are part of the problem), but think about this. Intelligent people--men and women--leverage their intelligence to get ahead. Strong people--generally men but also some women--leverage their strength. Beautiful people--generally women but also some men--leverage their beauty. Intelligent and strong people exploit their intellect and strength without social disapproval, and are even celebrated for their accomplishments. But beautiful people who exploit their beauty are called shallow at best, and whores at worst.

I used to think it was all a soul-deep corruption passed genetically from functionally insane religious ancestors. America, after all, was founded by religious fundamentalists who came here to practice their own unique brands of hate and intolerance, not having the strength to force their will on others in Europe and essentially being driven out of Europe by the fundamentalists in power who did have the strength to force their practices on others.

But now I think it goes much deeper, to an innate hatred of women in general. I could go into the basis of that hate, but it is so fundamental that most people do not even recognize how it shapes their thoughts and attitudes. I think it stretches back to social mores put in place when god-worship first supplanted goddess-worship, and when social goals turned from fertility and construction to war and destruction. And over the tens of thousands of years it has been the norm, it has become figuratively cemented into our psyches.

If you can possibly put aside your deeply ingrained social prejudices, you can question why sex, which is pleasurable at all times and functionally necessary occasionally for the propagation of the species, gets such a bad rap. It is so illogically demonized that children can watch murder, torture, and other examples of man's general but endlessly inventive inhumanity toward his fellow man on television and in movies on a daily basis, but sex and nudity are strictly forbidden. To an objective mind, that makes no sense.

And here, finally, is my hypothesis: It is not sex per se that society is condemning, it is the most successful practitioners of sex--women--who are being condemned in a manner so cleverly and fundamentally devised that most people are not even aware it is happening. Even women are trained from birth to view themselves with self-loathing lest they wrest control of their own sexuality and employ that power to get ahead. So women who oppose pornography are actually, unconsciously, the "collaborators" in a social war helping to keep themselves subjugated.

It is not a conspiracy in the "second gunman" sense, but it has been ingrained in our thoughts and behaviors for so long that it will take a bold recognition of that concept and a concerted effort at rehabilitation to fix this corruption. That will challenge the current male-dominated power base, though, so if you are inclined to address this corruption be aware that you are Galileo before the evil domination of the Catholic Church and even though you are right, the power base and even the great unwashed, unintelligent, and unsophisticated masses are unknowingly aligned against you.

Personally, as a human being with a conscience, you can always strive to do the Right Thing and probably fly under the radar. Trying to rehabilitate others may raise your profile in dangerously visible ways, but it will be for a worthwhile cause. Sadly, though, one day you will be forced to choose between what is right and what is expedient, and that's when you will know the strength of your convictions. However, if strength of convictions were the sole test for passage into heaven, hell would be where almost everyone would be residing.

My two cents.

Sunday, October 2nd 2011 - 04:53:32 PM

Name: Pedersen Erling
E-mail address:

Let me in

Sunday, October 2nd 2011 - 05:44:23 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Pedersen Erling: Let Me In? That was that vampire movie, right? The one with the cute 14-year old? Does somebody get tied up in that, is that why you're mentioning it?

Unless you meant...let you in here? Dude, you're in! You don't have to sign up. You don't have to pay a membership fee. Unless you want to. Here, let me give you my PayPal address...

Sunday, October 2nd 2011 - 06:55:50 PM

Name: John Galt

Well, it has been a while since I reviewed a Powershotz production. I've been waiting for Steve to get himself another pretty young thing to use and abuse in his inimitable manner. Sadly, I have been disappointed. But I took a chance on Ashley, who does not look overly young, but is definitely hot and sexy. So it was just a matter of waiting to see if she was going to let Steve, um, violate her in addition to tying her up. And happily she did. So here is Part One of an Ashley Powershotz Twofer, featuring one of my all-time favorite bondage positions, bound spread-eagled in a table.

* * * * *

Ashley - Drawing the Tub (Powershotz, 2011)

This video clip runs almost 25 and a half minutes, and stars Ashley, an attractive blue-eyed beauty with long, straight dirty blond hair and a shapely body.

Ashley is sitting out in the sun when she decides to fill the tub on the porch with water. Right away I am disconcerted by the camera angles, which seem to be anything but level. In fact, they rock back and forth so much I feel dizzy. Or maybe that was that cantaloupe I ate. Anyway, she starts the tub filling and then walks upstairs to take a 5-minute nap. I envy people who can fall asleep that fast.
Ashley gets some sun
Ashley undresses and climbs onto the bed and just watching her do that is incredible. Look at that last picture below. Who wouldn't want to hit that?
Ashley undresses and climbs into bed
The Masked Man walks in as she wakes up and chloroforms her. (Her reaction to his sudden appearance is mediocre.) She kicks her feet a lot as she struggles, which is a response I always enjoy. She falls unconscious and the Masked Man carries her off over his shoulder.
Ashley gets chloroformed and abducted
About 5:00 minutes in, the Masked Man lays an unconscious Ashley on a large wooden dinner table. He pulls her wrists and ankles to the four corners. Ashley looks very hot spread-eagled on top of the table. She has boobs that are still evident even when stretched out on her back and a nice shaved crotch. There is a fixed camera directly above the table looking down, and another from the side, and we get to spend six minutes enjoying her naked body as the Masked Man organizes his restraints and binds her wrists and ankles to the table.
Ashley is positioned and tied to the table
At about 11:00 minutes we get a tour of Ashley's bound and outstretched naked body, with close-ups of her bound wrists and ankles, her pussy, her breasts and her face.

At about 14:00 minute mark, Ashley wakes up and does a decent job of acting like a girl who has been knocked out and subsequently wakes up to find herself bound naked and spread-eagled to a wooden table with a Masked Man standing over her fingering her pussy. There is a brief episode of hand gagging and fingers-down-the-throat, and then Ashley is ballgagged.
Ashley is assaulted
About 20 minutes in we go to a 3-camera view: top, side and bottom, looking up between Ashley's spread legs. Then out comes the vibrator and the Masked Man runs it over Ashley's breasts, under her arms (she is ticklish), down her torso, and then on and in her pussy. He pauses long enough to apply some oil to her pussy and then inserts the tip of the vibrator and continues vibing as Ashley arches and struggles. Sadly, the vibrator bit does not build to a screaming and thrashing over-vibed to sensitivity climax, or even an orgasm (or a fake orgasm). It just kind of stops.
Ashley is vibed
The Masked Man walks away and then in a bit that had me laughing out loud, he gives Ashley stage directions to struggle and beg to be released, which Ashley does quite well, But I really think the stage direction should have been edited out, because it sounded like stage direction instead of, say, a cruel and twisted captor who wanted to hear his victim beg.

SUMMARY: Ashley is sunning when she decides to go upstairs, strip naked, and take a brief nap. The Masked Man chloroforms her, carries her out over his shoulder, binds her spread-eagled to a large wooden dining table, gags her, feels her up, and then fucks her with a vibrator.

The scenes were all brightly lighted, except there's a green light source that I do not like. It casts a sickly green illumination over the scene, which is not a flattering color for a nubile, naked hottie being bound and sexually molested. Normal fluorescent lighting or even standard incandescent lighting with its warmer hues would have been preferable. The sound was good, and except for a couple of clunky camera movement issues--and the see-saw camera angles of the first five minutes--nicely filmed. There were some two-view split screens and some three-view split screens. I know that is an issue for some folks but it worked for me. The leather bonds were nice and tight. There was a ball gag. There was minimal force, but there was force. And even though there was no "nonconsensual" sex, I still would have liked a more vigorous climax. All in all, though, not a bad clip. I give it a B- as a standalone scene.

This video clip is available for download from the Powershotz store for $12.00. There are a few more stills on the Powershotz description page.

Sunday, October 2nd 2011 - 09:53:24 PM

Name: Bill K.

Stormrider's BATS art pic is terrific, which I don't believe seeing before at Stakedamsels. Is it new or old art and are there more BATS art by Stormrider? Bill K.

Monday, October 3rd 2011 - 12:22:45 AM

Name: shankster

Well, you drew me out of the woodwork with todays pic.

I already have a couple of earlier versions of this as it was a WIP, and they are among my favorites.

Storm rider has at least one more BATS pic that I'm sure you've seen, with a brunette at the stake.

All of his work I've seen so far is excellent! Thanks man.

Monday, October 3rd 2011 - 04:54:37 AM

Name: Sloth
Homepage URL:

Ralphus - really nice poser pic today - what every BATS scene should aspire to.

John Galt - yeah, ditto your grade on "Rise" - they had it going nicely and let it get away - that scene with Cameron could have been so much more - and Ashley certainly is a cutie - I assume we will be seeing her again - thanks.

YikYakker - count me in on mad scientist flicks - love 'em - "Mill of the Stone Women" not only had some nice Gimpage but is a nicely done horror film in general - sometimes described as the best horror film no one has ever seen - your clip link with Dany Carrel is nice but she gets rescued - I prefer the earlier sequence running in parts 7-9 where Liana Orfei does not fare as well and gets the chemical stone treatment - I linked to a trailer of another mad scientist flick from the mid-fifties - now there is no surgical table but the concept is similar - using chicks to prolong the life of others - in this case they are bound and gagged, placed in a chemical bath with electrodes attached and drained of their "life forces" - loosely based on the mythology surrounding Comte St. Germain - the film is nowhere near as well done as "Mill" but I enjoy catching it every so often as there are several carry scenes, one with the best struggling ever - and found it a bit surprising they landed Victor Jory to play the main heavy.

Stay well all

Monday, October 3rd 2011 - 10:48:08 AM

Name: YikYakker

Sloth: Thanks for the information about Mill of the Stone Women. Sounds like just the kind of movie I'd enjoy.

Another interesting mad scientist flick is The Wax Mask, which successfully captures the spirit of similar movies from the same era. He turns his victims into paralyzed exhibits for his museum, but instead of an operating table he uses an electro-mechanical chair with a robotic injection device. And he certainly has good taste.


Today's Pic: Mmmmm, just the thing for a cold, wet fall day. I feel better already.


John Galt: Looks like you've found another winner for us with Ashley - Drawing the Tub. That scene with the bad guy slinging the naked chick over his shoulder is a deal-maker.

I like your capping technique, too - making those pics all the same size and positioning them together seamlessly. Do you use particular software to do that?

Regarding your review of Rise: Blood Hunter: As someone who has taken some flak over the years for the grades I hand out in reviews, I understand where you're coming from. Frankly, as long as you continue to provide rich descriptions of the scenes and tell us what you like and don't like, that's good enough for me.


Pedersen Erling: Welcome to the group; looking forward to hearing more from you.


Long post alert: I'm going to chime in with a few thoughts about the whole sexism/objectification topic, but this post is already pretty lengthy so I'll stop in again and post my rant separately.

Monday, October 3rd 2011 - 08:01:15 PM

Name: John Galt

YikYakker: Well, I was using the Linux version of GIMP (I know, right?) but it put white sidewalls down the sides of my composite images for some reason. I still have not figured it out, but my modus operandi is to use something that works instead of wasting time trying to figure out why something else does not.

So now I use Photoshop. Basically, since all the vidcaps are the same size from the same source, I just mathematically figure out what size two across and two down is (or however many rows I want), create a blank image the right size, then copy the individual images into the composite and paste them side-by-side. After I get the whole composite image the way I want it, I re-size it to 600 pixels wide, since that fits best on the Reviews pages.

My vidcaps come from the snapshot utility of VLC Media Player, the best all-around video player in existence. And it's free.

I also cannot resist the opportunity to lighten up the original images to achieve better clarity, and color correct where possible. You'll notice I could not completely get rid of the sickly green color cast on the Ashley images.

Personally, I am torn between using fewer nice, full-size images, or composites that are necessarily smaller. The advantage of the composites is that I can show things that wouldn't be all that compelling as a single image, but in conjunction with others it is great. An excellent example of this is in the newly illustrated review I did of Screaming Dead, where--at Ralphus' suggestion--I included a picture of the red-hot dildo menacing the girl in the pit. A big picture of just that dildo wouldn't have been a good use of space, but placed beside the picture where she's looking down between her legs at it, well, it is quite effective, I think.

I like the pics from The Wax Mask, by the way. I may need to look that one up and check it out. Especially since it has... nudity.

I look forward to your sexism/objectification post.

Monday, October 3rd 2011 - 09:40:47 PM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: Ashley - Drawing the Tub sounds like it has a lot going for it. It's too bad about the green lighting and the bad decision on the vibrator scene. Nonetheless, I enjoyed the review and all the caps.

Monday, October 3rd 2011 - 09:43:37 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: You're keeping me busy with all these new reviews. Plus between you and Canadian, we've been able to update quite a few of the older reviews with pictures this time around. I don't know how many of us go back and re-read old reviews, but I know I do on occasion. It's nice to have them there as a resource for others to check out.

The Screaming Dead review is a good example of a fine review made better because of the visuals. Sometimes you don't have 5 or 10 minutes to devote to reading a review. But everyone has time to look at pictures. If you like what you see, you'll likely read more. A naked woman tied up will grab someone's attention quicker than a bunch of black and white words telling about a naked woman tied up.

As for the Powershotz review, I was initially drawn into your review because of the pictures. Face it, Ashley looks damn hot all spread out and ballgagged like that. But after reading what you had to say, it sounds like more of the same things that frustrate me about Powershotz productions...models who are acting-challenged, vibrators and split-screens. 3 images in one shot? Here's an about editing and giving us the best shot?

Not to mention questionable camerawork and a sloppy lack of cutting. I know the idea is to put these things together quickly but gaffes like the one you mentioned take you out of the scene and can ruin the fantasy. Obviously, you liked it enough to give it a decent grade. I'll bet you've personally gotten him a lot of sales over the past few years.

The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above. Keep up the good work.


Lots of positive reactions to today's daily picture by Stormrider, and for good's a damn fine artwork. I know a lot of you aren't as enthused with burning as the stake as I am. but you have to admit it's a really well-done piece of work. As for more BATS, there's at least one more of his artworks with that theme. He hasn't finished e-mailing me out his collection, but I really love what I've seen.

He's one of the best poser artists I've found and the themes to his creations are what really ring my bell. Lots of medieval torture a la fact, a lot of his artworks are going to be exactly what Jane will endure in the movie. Besides BATS, there's horse torture, whipping and the rack. If you like what you see, be sure and leave feedback for him. He reads the forum and has posted here at least once. Hopefully he'll stop by and post at least once during his promotion.

Monday, October 3rd 2011 - 11:10:35 PM

Name: mothbrad

Ralphus, while the BATS picture interested me, but didn't do much beyond that, today's picture is 100% perfect. More like this, please!

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 03:11:00 AM

Name: Stormrider

Thanks for the responses to my pic, everyone. Glad the group likes them.

@Bill K. : Glad you like it. It's an old pic that I've reworked since my skills (and software) have improved. Unfortunately, I only have a couple of BATS pics, all of which I've emailed to Ralphus. They are extremely challenging/ time consuming to do in a way that looks even remotely believable (and interesting).

@ shankster: I'm honored that this is one of your's one of mine too. I'm somewhat embarrased by my earlier attempts at that pic (and Poser in general). Which is why it's always been knawing at me to fix it up.

@ Ralphus: Thanks for the kind words and for sharing my art with the group. A caveat, though: Not all of my pics are this polished. This is mainly due to my short attention span, and in some cases due to my lack of skills in a specific area. Having said that, comments/ critiques are most welcome. Peace.

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 03:40:36 AM

Name: YikYakker

On Sexism and Objectification of Women: Sexism is a heinous thing when practiced in families, workplaces, educational institutions and religious organizations. But many of the big victories against discriminatory behavior have already been won. What remains are the day-to-day, subtle (or not so subtle) prevailing attitudes and habits that are more difficult to exterminate. Force women to cover themselves completely and be obedient to their husbands? That's our religion. Tell female subordinates that they can "get ahead" much more quickly in the workplace if they lose weight and dress better, maybe wear higher heels, scrap the pants for short skirts? It's my company, I can do and say what I want. What can an advocacy group do?

It's much easier for advocates to attack what they perceive to be the symbols of their nemeses in the media (advertisements, TV shows, movies, porn, music, etc.). Groups can achieve tangibles wins, such as getting a TV show canceled, convincing Wal-Mart to stop selling certain videos/CDs, persuading retailers to pull ads. They loudly celebrate these moral victories in order to shore up or increase support from members, volunteers, contributors, sponsors and fellow travelers. They get media attention and crow about their 'achievements' in their annual reports and newsletters. Oh, they'll admit, there is still much work to be done. But do they ever get it done? Does any of this really end or reduce the practice of sexism in everyday life? Where is the evidence?

"But," they'll say, "these images treat women as sex objects, they 'influence attitudes' and 'send the wrong message'. We must stamp out every last one of them." But ultimately, these messages are "fantasies". A message, like beauty, is in the mind of the beholder. Reality is what goes on in everyday life. Is there a cause-and-effect relationship between messages and behavior? Damned if I know, nor do I care. I have not found studies linking media experiences to attitudes or behavior - sexist or violent - to be convincing. What I want to know is - how to these advocates actually change the real lives of real people in the community?

Consider the practice of witch-hunting. Disease killing off your cows? Witchery. Lightning struck your house and it burned to the ground? Blame the witch and execute her. Witch-hunting didn't explain why these disasters happened, nor did it remedy the problems. But it made everyone feel safer and buttressed community support for authority figures. It was also a convenient way for authorities to reclaim their power and get rid of 'troublesome' people. All without doing any real thinking or showing any respect for human life.

I've got no problem with religious crusaders who want to eradicate child pornography. It's a real problem with real consequences. What's the point of going after 'The Playboy Club' TV show? It's like Don Quixote tilting at windmills. "Hey, we might not be accomplishing anything, but we're doing it with righteous zeal!"

Just one last point, and then I'll jump off the soapbox. When the original Charlie's Angels series aired on TV, it was criticized as one of an increasing wave of "jiggle shows" - Three's Company was another - that flaunted women's sensuality to achieve high ratings. But the parents' group that attacked the show didn't get very far with their opposition. So they switched tactics - they said the show was "too violent". Huh? Rarely did anyone get killed, or even hurt badly on that show. But you know what really bugged these advocates? The idea of men engaging in hand-to-hand combat with women. Oh, how horrible. None of these women ever got hit hard, and never got punched in the face. And there were countless shows that were more violent on TV, but that was OK, it was only men getting killed or hurt by other men. Bah! The hypocrisy sickens me.

Folks, thanks for tolerating my long rant. Back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 11:06:07 AM

Name: esso
E-mail address:

Yik Yakker - re: your view on sexism. I agree with most of what you have to say however as regards the part about suggesting to a subordinate she dress more suggestively to get ahead, what could an advocacy group do? Sue. And there is a more than 50/50 chance she'd win. I own a mid-sized company with 75 employees and I promise you if an employee here made such a statement he would either make a formal apology and do whatever was necessary to appease the offended party or be told not to let the door hit him in the ass on the way out. And this has nothing to do with my feelings on the subject, simply the realities of today's workplace. Also I cannot let the opportunity go by to use Eddie Murphy's great line. "If a man tells a woman she has to go out with him or else he will fire her - that's sexual discrimination. Everything else goes under the category of trying to get laid."

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 06:08:51 PM

Name: esso

Whoops. It wasn't Eddie Murphy but Chris Rock in the previous post. I guess that makes me a racist for confusing two black comedians.

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 06:10:45 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

YikYakker: Thank you, that was a well-written dissertation. I agree with a lot of what you wrote, along with John Galt's theory that all this protesting may have at its cause a deep-seeded hatred of women in general. Of course, they'll never ever admit it, but it does make some sense. I usually dismiss these groups as misguided religious whackos, but they're hard to ignore because they do have an impact on the laws that are passed and the censorship that has gone on for decades against the adult entertainment industry.

What I can't understand is...what do they have against sexy women? Is it religion per se that sees images of them as something evil that must be eradicated? I was raised as a Christian and I've never felt that way. I don't recall any anti-pornography sermons in church. The closest thing I remember was being at a youth group outing in the late 70s or early 80s and hearing one of the pastors suggest they should have a bonfire and have people throw copies of Playboy magazine onto it. I don't know if that ever happened or not. All I know is that somehow they seem to equate porn with being anti-God. You know, lead us not into temptation. You can't worship God if you also worship sex. I guess that's it, right?

But what do I know? Maybe I just don't understand the way religious people think. After all, I'm the one who went up to the Amish woman and told her she would look a lot hotter if she would only let her hair down.

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 07:20:03 PM

Name: A Canadian

Canadian Reviews Redux: As Ralphus mentioned yesterday, I have been following John Galt's lead and adding video caps to some of my favorite reviews. The first round of additions is now completed. For those wishing to take a look (and I hope you will look), the upgraded reviews are:

I think the pictures make a huge difference and give people a better idea what the movies look like.

Special thanks to Ralphus for all his work adding the photos to the reviews. It's important to understand that I give instructions the same way people in small towns give travel directions ("When you get to that big tree where the old church used to be, before it was burned down in the '80s...") so plenty of patience was required on our moderator's part to understand where I wanted the caps placed. His help is very much appreciated.

There are some other reviews I plan to cap down the road, but I no longer own the discs, so I will have to get new copies. I know Sloth would expect me to cap Slave Town 2 with Maria Ozawa, and there are some others that deserve to be illustrated. I will get to them at some point.

Of course, this brings up an interesting question. I own some discs for movies that have been reviewed on the forum but weren't reviewed by me. There are at least a couple that I wouldn't mind capping, but that may be a violation of the Prime Directive. Something for our fearless leader to think about.

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 09:18:17 PM

Name: YikYakker
Homepage URL:

Ralphus wrote [about religious groups]: What I can't understand is...what do they have against sexy women?

It's not the sexy woman they hate...they perceive the sexy woman as a symbol of what they hate: lust, temptation, moral decay. These problems are big and intractable, so they pick the easier target and go after the sexy women.

I was raised as a Christian and I've never felt that way. I don't recall any anti-pornography sermons in church.

Time was when no one would even use the word *gasp* pornography in church. They didn't even want to acknowledge that it was out there.

I was raised in Pennsylvania, and assuming that you were raised in Ohio, I can assure you that if you cross the Mason-Dixon line or the Ohio River you are likely to hear a lot more preaching about pornography.


esso wrote [about sexism in the workplace]: ...what could an advocacy group do? Sue. And there is a more than 50/50 chance she'd win.

Well, you're absolutely right. First, let me salute you and your company for maintaining the proper attitudes about women.

Secondly, I would point out that it takes a woman with a great deal of courage and knowledge and support to step forward like that, and it takes a group with a lot of patience and resources to pursue a lengthy legal process instead of going for a quick headline. Where these elements are missing is probably where a lot of the problems are.

BTW, you are not a racist, but since Eddie Murphy is older than Chris Rock, you might be accused of being an ageist.;)


John Galt: I wholeheartedly agree with your views about The Screaming Dead, and I like the caps you've added. I see your point about how the four-in-one pics help illustrate GIMPage-in-progress; I think it's a great idea.

Sometimes I feel conflicted about watching Misty Mundae. Her performances are charming and natural. But that baby-doll face and petite structure makes me feel like I'm watching someone torture a 14-year-old. But then I get over it.

I don't have Photoshop - I use SnagIt. Supposedly it has the capability of making composite pictures, but I haven't figured it out yet. Or maybe it's on the "Pro" version or some such thing.

You wrote: My vidcaps come from the snapshot utility of VLC Media Player, the best all-around video player in existence. And it's free.

Absolutely agree with that, I use the snapshot feature for all of my caps.


Homepage URL: Remember that old saying about the rooster who thinks his crowing causes the sun to rise because one happens after the other?

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 09:35:27 PM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus said: All I know is that somehow they seem to equate porn with being anti-God. You know, lead us not into temptation. You can't worship God if you also worship sex.

Well, at the risk of repeating myself, you cannot easily a find more lucid example of hatred of women than Christianity. All of the sins of humanity, the "fall" of mankind from grace, are all attributed to the first woman, and all women since then have borne the curse of her "evil." That's why women menstruate, you know. It is a monthly curse for Eve's Original Sin. I'm not making this stuff up: It is in the Bible for anyone to read. And there are all sorts of lunatics (more commonly called "Christians") who believe it, lock, stock, and barrel.

And, as you know if you're up on your Christian mythology, Eve led Adam into temptation, as all women have done to all men since, you know, Creation, which happened on October 23, 4004 BCE. (We're coming up on the earth's 6,015th birthday in a few weeks, if you want to celebrate. Don't forget to don your festively decorated dunce cap. Oh, and it will also be BYOB--Bring Your Own Bible.)

Pornography is just the most visible (and profitable) method for these wicked and sensuous creatures to continue leading all righteous and God-fearing men into temptation. Pornography may not be anti-God, but God is definitely anti-pornography--as well as anti-woman.

* * * * *

A Canadian: I was just wondering which reviews you might have illustrated after Ralphus mentioned it. Thanks for the list. I will be checking them out.

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 10:17:31 PM

Name: Vince
Homepage URL:

I have some bad news, but looks like YikYakker beat me to the punch. I just read on the net that "The Playboy Club" is the first new show of this fall season to be canceled. Actually, I'm surprised the show lasted 3 weeks. When I first heard it announced on NBC's schedule in May I knew it wouldn't stand a chance. One reason is it would be compared it to the overrated darling period piece "Mad Men"and the critics would savage it. The second reason is that shows which have women scantily clad for most of their screen time would get criticized by prudes and religious groups sticking their nose in our business. They were making advertisers second guess if it was worth putting their ad on that show or be tainted by affiliation.

As John Galt mentioned, this show should have been on premium cable. That way, a show like "The Playboy Club" could show the raw sex and violence they were only hinting at on broadcast TV.

I'll miss seeing the breathtaking Amber Heard, Laura Benanti and the other actresses in their titillating outfits, along with the eventual future plots of all of them at some point put in sexual jeopardy.

Tuesday, October 4th 2011 - 11:08:01 PM

Name: John Galt

Alas, The Playboy Club. I didn't think you were an especially compelling show, what with being broadcast on network television and all, but I would have preferred to see you fail or succeed on the basis of poor writing or lousy scripts, like 99.99% of the other crap on broadcast channels. Being done in by self-righteous, sanctimonious hypocrites just kind of adds insult to injury. Rest in peace.

Hopefully, if they already shot several episodes, those might see release on DVD. Or maybe they could shop the show to pay cable. It doesn't have the sick blood-and-gore appeal of a show about a serial killer, or the reverse-role irony of a show about a male prostitute, or the violence and questionable ethics of a regular guy who turns to selling drugs, but maybe if they made it violent enough to overcome its blatant sexuality with the more-acceptable brutality Americans find so appealing, it could be given a second chance.

Or not.

As I promised a couple of days ago, here is Part Two of my Ashley Powershotz Twofer. I feel the need for some borderline consensual sexual abuse video entertainment goodness, and Powershotz can always be depended on to deliver that. God bless you, Steve.

* * * * *

Ashley - Forced Anal Tryout (Powershotz, 2011)

This video clip is 18 and a half minutes long. It stars Ashley, a blue-eyed hottie with long straight dirty blond hair and a really nice body.

We begin with Ashley on  a wooden stool with her chin on a horizontal metal cross bar. Her ankles are bound together with leather straps and she has a large plastic gag covering her mouth. Her wrists are each leather strap-bound to the vertical bars of the crossbar. She is completely naked and her breasts look really nice hanging down underneath her.

The Masked Man shows her the conical end of the glass rod and asks her what she thinks it is for. A rhetorical question, no doubt.
Ashley prepared for anal violation

There is the standard spanking and then the command to "arch that back--hard!" which is repeated quite a bit throughout the video. So I'm just going to mention it the once here. The Masked Man also shows Ashley the large wooden gun-shaped dildo, but alas we aren't going to see him violate her with it in this clip.

After he squirts some oil onto the top of her crack and lets it drip down between her ass cheeks and onto her pussy, the Masked Man fingers her thoroughly. Ashley does not look particularly bothered by this indignity initially, which is kind of disappointing, but when the Masked Man kneels down behind her and spreads her open and starts probing her asshole, she begins to show some discomfort. When his thumb slides up her asshole, her feet also start twitching, which is usually a sure sign of vexation. Eventually he pushes two fingers up into her and she cries out and we get a cut. I like when that happens.
Ashley being fingered and probed

Immediately after the cut we are back and the Masked Man has the glass rod poised up against Ashley's asshole. There is the normal teasing and rubbing and then he violates her with it. Her pained response is nice. It goes on for a while.
Ashley being violated with the glass rod

At about the 10:15 minute mark, the Masked Man walks in with the plastic cock hanging out of his pants. First he has her suck on the plastic cock, but the camera placement is bad for that and half of her face is often off-screen. Also, an annoying green light is full on her face, giving her a completely green cast. It is not a good lighting effect. And while I'm nitpicking, we stay in a two camera view while she is being forced to suck the plastic cock, and while her ass is quite attractive, I think a single view of just her sucking and choking on the plastic cock might have been a better choice. Just saying.

Right about the 12-minute mark, the Masked Man walks around behind Ashley, squirts some more oil down her crack, and begins teasing the plastic cock up and down her crack, finally pushing it into her pussy. That doesn't bother Ashley too much. He starts moving in and out harder and faster, and she shows a small response, but when he starts pushing his thumb into her asshole while he is fucking her pussy, she reacts visibly.

Next, the Masked Man repositions the front camera to capture her face with her chin on the bar. There's a very brief exchange where he asks if she's okay and she says, with some irritation, "I'm fine! I just want it over with." Heh.

Getting it over with involves sodomizing her with the plastic cock. It is hard going, with Ashley crying out "ow" on more than one occasion, and also twisting her hips to disengage the cock. Finally, though, the Masked Man gets it inside of her and builds up a rhythm that has Ashley moving back and forth with his thrusts, and making facial expressions filled with pain and discomfort. It's pretty cool. At length, she twists her hips to disengage him and shakes her head right before another edit cut.
Ashley fucked with the plastic cock

In the next scene we have the front camera off a bit to the side and Ashley looks relaxed and reluctantly ready for another ass reaming. The Masked Man slides the plastic cock into her. Ashley grits her teeth and cries out. The Masked Man takes hold of Ashley's hips and starts pumping her (relatively) hard and fast. Ashley struggles and cries out loudly. Another quick cut, and we rejoin Ashley with the Masked Man's plastic cock already deep inside her. More loud cries, gasping and grunting as the Masked Man makes "I'm ready to come" sounds and moves around to Ashley's mouth. He pushes the plastic cock into Ashley's mouth and before long thick white goo is gushing back out.

Ashely being fucked hard and deep
There's a brief bit at the very end where he makes her open her mouth to show the goo and then tells her to swallow it. Then he sticks his fingers down her throat to be sure. What a guy. It's a nice coda.
Ashley swallows

SUMMARY: Ashley is already bound on her hands and knees. The Masked man oils her crack, fingers her, fucks her pussy and ass with a the glass rod, makes her suck the plastic cock, then fucks her pussy and ass with the plastic cock. Finally, he "comes" in her mouth.

Another typical Powershotz anal violation video, with a reluctant subject, which is always the best kind. The camera work could have been better, remaining in split camera view when a single camera would have been better. The sound was a bit loud, but I have a volume control. The lighting was nice and bright, but there's a green light source that casts a green pall over Ashley's face the entire time, and that is not a flattering lighting effect.

Ashley did an exceptionally nice job of being uncomfortably violated. My opinion is that the most exciting Powershotz videos are the ones where Steve pushes the model's limits, and Ashley looked like her limit was reached on more than one occasion. Lots of crying out and struggling. And her facial expressions were very good as well. The part where the Masked Man took hold of Ashley's shapely hips and really started pounding her up the ass was especially nice. Mouth, pussy and ass violation, enough force to make it look vaguely nonconsensual, and a hot sexy body all combined to make this a B+ performance.

This video clip is available for download at the Powershotz store for $12.00. There are also some more images on the description page.

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 12:21:50 AM

Name: MrAnthony

John Galt wrote:

Well, at the risk of repeating myself, you cannot easily a find more lucid example of hatred of women than Christianity. All of the sins of humanity, the "fall" of mankind from grace, are all attributed to the first woman, and all women since then have borne the curse of her "evil." That's why women menstruate, you know. It is a monthly curse for Eve's Original Sin. I'm not making this stuff up: It is in the Bible for anyone to read. And there are all sorts of lunatics (more commonly called "Christians") who believe it, lock, stock, and barrel.

This is just plain insulting, and hardly "lucid." Christianity attributes sin to temptation coming from Satan, not women. Christianity does not hate women, as evidenced by the reverence for Mary as the Mother of Jesus or Mary Magdalene, who in the Bible is seen as being smarter than many of the men. In fact, the resurrected Jesus appears first to Mary Magdalene, hardly something that would happen if women were hated. Note also that Mary Magdalene is hardly a pure person, the implication being that even a less than pure woman deserves respect. As for an easier example for the hatred of women, try the Taliban in Afghanistan where women aren't allowed to go to school, drive, or be seen unless covered. BTW, where in the Bible does it say that menstuation is the punishment for Original Sin? If it's there to read, kindly point it out to us. Otherwise, I say you're making this stuff up.

And, as you know if you're up on your Christian mythology, Eve led Adam into temptation, as all women have done to all men since, you know, Creation, which happened on October 23, 4004 BCE. (We're coming up on the earth's 6,015th birthday in a few weeks, if you want to celebrate. Don't forget to don your festively decorated dunce cap. Oh, and it will also be BYOB--Bring Your Own Bible.)

This was promulgated not by the Bible, but by a Protestant bishop, James Ussher in 1648, using the limited knowledge of the time. Obviously, facts since 1648 (not available to him) prove his calculations to be completely wrong, something I suspect would have forced Ussher to adjust his timeline accordingly. Yes, there are a few people who still believe his incorrect timeline, but they are a minority, not the majority. Perhaps you should study up on history instead of misguided general hatred.

Being Roman Catholic myself, I can tell you that many pieces of authorized art feature nude women. So please don't try this BS about Christianity in general hating women, sex, or nudity. True, some groups (e.g. the Puritans, the Pilgrims, etc) show clear sexual hangups. But you are too smart to paint with such a wide brush and the vitriol you provide does not do justice to your intellect. Being Christian is not incompatible with enjoying sex, enjoying nudity, or even liking GIMP art. It's just that some people, both Christians and non-Christians (think atheist feminist, for example) feel that any sexual portrayal of women via the media is exploitive and degrading, which is a political/personal viewpoint.

To bring this back to GIMP, it's clear that regular television has to fit into the mainstream, avoiding offense to the audience it seeks. That's why movies are edited for television with all the good parts cut. It's why low rated shows get cancelled. If shows like the Playboy Club got huge ratings, then offended people couldn't get it cancelled no matter how much they protested. FACT: You can't please everyone.

There's plenty of nudity on shows like Game of Thrones, GIMP and nudity on True Blood, nudity and GIMP in Dexter, nudity in Hung, etc. If the hangups Mr. Galt talks about existed generally, these shows would see Christians rioting in the streets (particularly for True Blood).

BTW, nice reviews from John Galt and much appreciated.

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 01:19:50 AM

Name: Bill K.

Terrific Spanish horse real looking detail poser art Stormrider but why in the 3 posted pics here of your terrific poser art I notice that there are no torture scars, whip marks, blood or bruises on any of the damsels in tortured distress which does not take away the terrific quality of your art. Please do not take my question as to why you choose to create your terrific poser art this way as good or bad for it is not my meaning. I am just curious and please continue to create your terrific peril art anyway you like. Bill K.

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 01:34:28 AM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

Yeah, NBC should've greenlighted Wonder Woman for fall season instead. I liked its pilot better than the Playboy Club.

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 03:40:04 AM

Name: Klingsor
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

"Battle of the Amazons"

A mainstream B-movie from the 1970s. You all might know the bullwhipping scene. A male slave is allowed to punish an Amazon. The topless, busty blonde is tied up at the whipping post and gets 7 lashes (German version). You can see the whip-impact. One lash sucks into her breast and the body is thrown backwards. It's one of my favourite whipping scene - and I know nearly every female whipping in movies. But: For now 30 years I`m searching for the name of the actress (perhaps a body-double ?).

Does anyone know her name? Other appearances in movies ?
Please post here or mail to me!

whipping-greetings from Germany

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 06:34:47 AM

Name: Greg
Homepage URL:

Likewise Klingsor. This has to be one of my favourite scenes too and recently I got a replacement for my lost German version of that whipping scene where 'she'll find it more degrading to have a man whip her', whilst we all think cool, that means the bitch gets it from a mean and angry MF.

The whip sounds are phoney as hell, but who cares. Great action and great to see this blonde bombshell tits out and raring to be viewed.

Great to be reminded. Here's the scene for those that don't have it:

BTW, just wondered if anybody else saw that film Swept Away the other night.

I am referring to the 1974 version, with Mariangela Melato as the bitch, not Madonna.

Its script was pretty Gimp-worthy in places where the lead threatens to punish her and she has to call him master and kiss his feet. All stuff that in a better context with some real power behind the threats would make star viewing for sure.

Didn't watch the whole thing, but I did like the dialogue of what I did see. Typical European mid-seventies stuff from that point of view and besides. seeing Mariangela Melato for long periods in a bikini has to be worth a watch.


Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 09:03:40 AM

Name: Badger

Superb artwork in today's pic. It brings back memories of the prisoner in a similar predicament in "Love Camp 7". I was but a youngster when I saw that in a local "adult" theater. It was, shall I say, a seminal moment in my restless development.

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 09:33:42 AM

Name: Sloth

Badger - ah yes, the supreme sleaze of "Love Camp 7" - like you I think that was my intro to pony rides in anything resembling a mainstream film - ditto on the strappado scene - could always count on Lee Frost and David Friedman to supply a few decent Gimp moments.

A Canadian - Maria who? - but yes, those would be nice additions to the review - I'm waiting for the movie review on your latest dungeon babe.

With Halloween fast approaching I'll beak out my Inquisitor costume - not for trick or treating but so I'll be in character for viewing "Maleficarum" when released.

Stay well all

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 11:07:49 AM

Name: YikYakker

Today's Pic: Stormrider, this is a fantastic piece of art. I like the colors and textures and technique and...oh to hell with it, the girl is hot!

Seriously, it's fine work.

I'll bet Jane von Detlefson is glad she didn't have to sit on a horse of that type.


Klingsor: Thanks for reminding us about that whipping scene from Battle of the Amazons. Like you, I'm a fan of whipping scenes, but I'm not sure I have this one. Sorry can't help you with the actress' name.

Greg: Thanks for the link to that scene. The originator of the whipping database wrote a commentary about it that was not very favorable, but it looks pretty hot to me. Perhaps he wasn't watching the German version?


MrAnthony: I appreciate your clarity on the issue of Christianity vis a vis women. Most scholars feel that compared with other religions that were around at the time it began, Christianity was relatively respectful of women, which is why it initially spread quickly.

But the roots of hostility toward overt acts of sexuality go much farther back in history. Since the beginning of civilization, human societies have tried to regulate sexual behavior. Most of those attempts centered on distinguishing between sex for the purpose of reproduction and sex for the purpose of recreation. Humankind (or its leadership) seemed to feel that people would have so much fun having sex-for-recreation that they would forget about sex-for-reproduction. If such practices as masturbation, sodomy, fellatio and homosexuality caught on, the human race would be threatened with eventual extinction.

That notion seems absurd to us today but the emotional and religious layers surrounding the idea have passed down through the centuries up to the present day. The term Fornication, as defined by traditional Christianity, basically covers any type of sexual behavior that does not involve an effort to reproduce.

This accounts for the abject hatred that many religious leaders and their followers have toward fornication. But they're probably not even aware of how or why that hatred started, so they have to rationalize it with the "wrong message" or "evil influence" concepts.

By extension, any symbolic representation of fornication, or anything that espouses, condones, or "glorifies" it (like pornography, TV, or "raunchy music") is subject to condemnation. Hence the opposition to The Playboy Club which is equated with non-monogamous sex (a variant of fornication).

Note that the Parents' Television Council referred to Playboy as a "brand". A brand is a symbolic representation of something. See what a long, strange trip this has been?

Now, GIMPage = sexuality + violence, so it's even more problematical (except for us, of course). GIMPage symbolically represents - remember it's not reality, it's fantasy - two things that religious groups and others want to attack. The media have become gladiatorial arenas for symbolic conflicts. Absurd, isn't it?

Folks, thanks for tolerating another long post, sometimes I get carried away.

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 08:32:13 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Nice work on the review and caps of Ashley - Forced Anal Tryout. I'm more into full-length movies, rather than video clips, but I can see where this one looks like a lot of fun.


Sloth wrote:

I'm waiting for the movie review on your latest dungeon babe.

I will get to it.

The challenge will be on the capping side, rather than the writing end. I downloaded a version of the movie off the Internet and, unfortunately, my version has watermarks in it (I have no idea why). Thus, for capping purposes, I will need to get a copy of the disc from the U.S., which may take a few weeks.

Nonetheless, I definitely will review it at some point.

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 09:53:30 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Thanks again for letting us know about the Powershotz video. Yet another unimaginative split-screen production, this time from beginning to end. I keep hoping Steve will learn. When even his biggest booster is critical of this technique, maybe it's time for him to reconsider that production choice. But somehow, I doubt that will happen. *sigh*

The link to your latest review is in my Homepage URL above.


The Playboy Club: I never saw the show except for the Amber Heard rape scene online, but I'm not sure it had a lot of potential as a show GIMPers could get around. I mean, Playboy Magazine itself was pretty mild and never really explored dark sexual fantasies in a way that other skin mags did. The whole reason why the magazine was famous was because it was the first mainstream publication that showed beautiful women naked. The TV show had the beautiful women, but you can't have nudity on network TV, so what's the point? People probably got tired of being teased and gave up on it. The protests that caused the advertisers to drop out definitely didn't help things.

I think a better choice for us would be that "Criminal Minds" show. Isn't there a spinoff this season? I wouldn't know since I barely ever watch TV. From what I hear, the first show has been very GIMP-friendly. Anybody know if the new show has delivered?


Badger wrote:

Superb artwork in today's pic.

I knew you guys would like these. Stormrider e-mailed me the rest of his collection yesterday. He warned me not to expect much, that these others weren't nearly as polished as the others. Well, he's either extremely modest or very tough on himself, because the others are just as great as the early ones. In fact, one of his "lesser" ones is the horse pic I ran tonight.


YikYakker wrote:

I'll bet Jane von Detlefson is glad she didn't have to sit on a horse of that type.

I think she did, didn't she? The design is different, but the point looks pretty sharp in this still from Maleficarum. If you've got a triangular wedge cutting into your pussy and it's supporting your weight, I'll bet that's plenty uncomfortable. Plus she's got the weights tied to each angle, further pulling down her body and putting more pressure on that sensitive area between her legs. But then I'm no expert. I just figured a horse is a horse (of course, of course).

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 10:23:57 PM

Name: Insomniac
Homepage URL:

Here's a little mini review of a new movie, World of the Dead: The Zombie Diaries. The storyline of the movie is pretty familiar, viral outbreak turns most of the world's population to zombies and a small group of survivors struggles to avoid the same fate.

The movie follows a group of troops, and at about an hour in, they are taken hostage by a group of guys who, let's just say do as they please now that there's no social order or authority to stop them.

One of the female soldiers (Vicky Araico) is hurt, and they proceed to rip her gear off (top shown only) and rape her. She's definitely gagged, and it looks like her arms are probably tied behind her back but it's unclear. She's injured to the point that she can't put up much of a fight regardless.

It's a short but unsettling scene.

Wednesday, October 5th 2011 - 10:53:58 PM

Name: John Galt

A Canadian said: I'm more into full-length movies, rather than video clips, but I can see where this one looks like a lot of fun.

Well, how convenient that Steve just released VL-065 - Hot Wet Bitches as a DVD and also in a downloadable version. It looks like it features the two Ashley clips I reviewed (plus another one, I think), as well as some clips of Aubrie. I bought an Aubrie clip--one of the anal training variety--but it doesn't look like that one is included on this DVD.

I will review the Aubrie clip in the next day or so, to give you some idea of what to expect from her. This is not the same gal as Aubrey, who I reviewed in a clip with Tatum called Aubrey and Tatum - Can't Get It In.

* * * * *

YikYakker: I do not understand why primitive societies would arbitrarily decide that sex for any reason other than procreation would pose a threat to the survival of society and so oppose it. I have never read anything to that effect, and personally I believe it gives primitive man credit for much more intelligence than he probably had. It is my observation that man rarely does anything for the good of society--the most compelling reasons for action are typically selfish.

So I would disagree with you on that point, and since there is very little (actually, no) documentation from prehistory available to substantiate or disprove either of our proposals, we can agree to disagree. However, I think that my suspicion that man almost always acts for selfish reasons is closer to reality than your suspicion that he is looking out for the greater good of society. But then I am a misanthrope so that probably colors my view.

I also dispute that any religion is or has ever been "respectful" of women in any sense of the word. The baseline for respect, to my way of thinking, is according someone equality. As recently as 2008, the Vatican issued a decree that any woman ordained as a Catholic priest would be excommunicated latae sentientiae, as would any Bishop who participated in the ordination. That hardly sounds respectful or deferential. It sounds like it is intended to keep women in their place. Here, in the 21st Century.

However, I do think, as GIMPers, we owe a massive debt of gratitude to all religions--most especially Roman Catholicism, for those of us in the Western World--for the wonderful tortures and inventive means of painfully killing women they pioneered. (To be truthful they slaughtered men as well, but there's no GIMP value in that.) There is a reason the Inquisition figures into so many of our favorite movies. Protestants certainly continued the horrors, but honestly I can't think of any substantial improvements they made to the classic methods of torture perfected by the Catholics. They burned witches, of course, but so did the Catholics. No, I think Protestants were just as wicked and brutal in their methods but definitely less inventive and original. Can anyone think of some torture method invented by the Puritans? (I really am curious.)

That's not to say that the Japanese and Chinese didn't also provide us with a lot of great torture devices. They did. I mean, come on, they turned rope bondage into an art. I'm not saying Western religions cornered the market on torture, cruelty and brutality. I'm just saying, you know, they held their own.

But just think how dull our GIMPish existences would be without such wonderful source material. So I guess religion is good for at least that.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 01:04:05 AM

Name: YikYakker

John Galt: We can agree to disagree, but the problem is that you have misrepresented, or misunderstood, what I wrote. Nowhere did I mention primitive man in my post. I was speaking about civilized societies, for which there is a historical record. If you want documentation that societies with a historical record have attempted to regulate sexual behavior, you need only look in any Sociology textbook.

As to why societies regulate sexual behavior, the obvious motivation behind control is fear. But ancient fears, over time, become so layered over with ignorance, superstitions (like religions), rationalizations and even pseudo-academic posturings that the original reasons behind those fears become lost. "Hatred of women", like its cousin "objectification of women" is simply a layer covering up the fear that is at its root. I don't think our ideas are incompatible in every respect. But I stand behind my assertion that there is a lot more involved than what you have presented.

It is nearly impossible, in modern society, to effectively regulate sexual behavior. Instead, modern witch-hunters attack the displays, or images, of sexuality. The logic chain - if one can even call it "logic" - is:

Lewdness -> temptation -> lust -> fornication

So crusaders who are frustrated in their attempts to control fornication start at the beginning of the chain and attack lewdness, or more specifically, lewd images. Hence the campaigns against sexuality in advertisements, movies, TV etc.

Crusaders will continue to fight against images as long as they believe that images are more powerful, more influential upon behavior, than other human attributes like intelligence, knowledge or even common sense. I maintain that this belief in the power of images is simply an excuse for going after easy, abstract targets.

I don't mind if people want to solve real problems. Just keep your hands off my fantasies.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 08:18:12 AM

Name: Nia
E-mail address:

I've come out of my lurk mode to wax philosophic with John Galt, Mr. Anthony and YikYakker. This has been a wonderful give and take in a respectful manner that is part of the charm of this great site. Please keep it going and don't agree to disagree.

I thought you might want a female perspective on the issues. Any society or religion that attempts to legislate against nature is just spitting into the wind. Our sexual nature can only be controlled to a limited extent and then our animal instincts will take over. You can pave the forest and make a parking lot, but without maintenance it will return to a forest in just a couple centuries.

As to what is the nature of women vs. men, that is the relevant question. Just because I'm a submissive female in a sexual relationship doesn't imply that I'm submissive in a societal role. In fact, I'm quite the opposite. But, my preferences do not necessarily constitute the norm.

I was raised a Catholic as well and I have the scars to prove it. The problem with Catholicism in the U.S. today relates to the ridiculous policy of maintaining celibacy for priests and nuns. It goes against the very nature of humanity and is doomed to the failures we've experienced in the church today.

As for what it says in the Bible, if I want to read fantasy, I'll go to the Gimp's fiction section.

Stormrider: Great artwork! Thanks.

Ralphus: A horse is not just a horse. Stormrider's horse had a sharp metal point which would be like sitting on a knife. Ouch! And her hands were tied behind her, which means all of her weight is permanently placed in one spot. With the AOH position, one can at least pull herself up for some temporary relief.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 09:16:58 AM

Name: Sloth

Ralphus - I think we can agree that Stormrider is being terribly humble - these are about as good as poser gets - I know I'll be disappointed with the answer but has he done anything with a good hanging in it - no.......what a shame.

Nia - well played with the parking lot analogy - although with a species as violent and aggressive as we I suspect it would not take centuries to revert, probably not even decades.

Insomniac - nice screen shot and sounds like a nice scenario - thanks.

John Galt - although they did not invent it the Puritans perfected a torture method that endures to this day - it's called having to sit through one of their two hour sermons - Amen.

Stay well all

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 09:56:28 AM

Name: Badger

Another day, another outstanding Stormrider piece of artwork. Having the cutie's friend forced to watch and imagine what is next is a great touch. But assuming that the young lady's ankles are locked together, our hairless friend must have had to slither in from underneath. That could only add to the enjoyment.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 01:40:35 PM

Name: John Galt

YikYakker: Yeah, I should probably have drawn a distinction between "primitive man" and "civilized man" more clearly. I think man was still quite primitive even when organized into a civilization. Truthfully, I consider man in the Middle Ages and in some cases into the Renaissance to be primitive in thought and deed, so I probably needed to use a word other than "primitive" in order to distinguish him from roving tribes of hunter-gatherers.

When you said the roots of hostility toward overt acts of sexuality go much farther back in history, I did indeed misunderstand you if you were saying you thought that hostility did not exist prior to "civilization," a starting point that I will admit now that I still cannot fully place on the historical timeline.

I do not think "pre-civilized" man--whenever that was--had any concept of society and therefore never made any choices "for the good of society." I was indeed referring to man in some form of early civilization.

I also did not mean to imply that I thought there was no record of early civilizations attempting to regulate sexual behavior. My point, as you continued to discuss, is the "why" of that attempted regulation.

You said: Humankind (or its leadership) seemed to feel that people would have so much fun having sex-for-recreation that they would forget about sex-for-reproduction. If such practices as masturbation, sodomy, fellatio and homosexuality caught on, the human race would be threatened with eventual extinction.

I interpreted that to mean that you were saying that societal leaders were taking steps to head off practices they feared would lead to extinction. I do not think that any leadership council in any society came to the conclusion that, for the good (if not the survival) of society, pleasurable fornication must end. (Logically, since methods of birth control were primitive at best, it is not unreasonable to posit that sex for pleasure quite often ended in reproduction anyway, whether intentional or not, and consequently life would go on.)

I believe sexual taboos were made to control people for selfish purposes. Control people's sex lives and you control people. And in a patriarchal society, it makes all sorts of sense to place the restrictions primarily on women, so as not to spoil the men's fun.

I would like you to explore what "fear" you think drives sexual repression. I would suspect it is a fear of losing power and influence. But when did that fear translate to hatred of women? What, exactly, is the connection between repressing sex and suppressing women? Men have sex as well.

Or is there no connection? Does the deep-seated hatred of women--evident throughout history in any number of aspects--have no relationship to sex? Have we conflated the two with no justification? Personally, I think they are connected. Sexual taboos just seem to negatively impact women a lot more than men, even though, arguably, both sexes practice it equally. There is something there.

And does that contribute to our appreciation for GIMP? Are we GIMPers one small step up in the sexual evolutionary tree? Below us stand the cruel misogynists who enjoy using and abusing women, keeping them subordinate and powerless to be used as sexual playthings and reproductive tools, and when they find a woman they cannot use or control, they employ social and religious mores to "get even."

And we GIMPers also have this dark love of cruelty and sexual deviancy, but instead of committing the atrocities that would satisfy those cravings, we enjoy them vicariously through entertainment media. It is also possible, of course, that there is a sexual evolutionary step above us, that feels none of those illicit sexual yearnings. However, I see no evidence of the existence of that evolved man, since I would expect him to also have an equally elevated respect for women. No, I don't see that very much at all.

I have thought about this (obviously), and examined some of my own feelings, vis-a-vis women in peril. Most of all, I like the visual. Let's consider a beautiful, helpless naked young woman stretched out on a rack. There's the intoxicating symphony of shapely limbs and torso, pulled nice and taut into sleek, smooth lines and planes and valleys. Of course, in my fantasy, there is also the gleaming sheen of perspiration, with the occasion drop forming and rolling downward, off the side of silky smooth legs, or down off of the breasts into the hollow of the delicate throat, or collecting in the belly button, or streaming down the insides of the creamy white thighs, coursing around the various sexual landmarks.

Then it is all made better as she struggles, curling her toes, flexing her fingers and making helpless fists as she pulls at the ropes cutting into her delicate wrists and shapely ankles. Visualize her muscles flexing and twisting uselessly as she realizes her helplessness.

Then the expressions and sounds she makes as she is used and abused. This is one of the reasons that "torture by vibrator" is acceptable to me. The visual and audible expressions of inflicting pain and, say, over-stimulation by vibrator, are remarkably similar. I just like that loss-of-control look and sound. Fear, apprehension, and anxiety are all exciting expressions on the face of a helpless hottie.

It is not so much about the pain or the concept of torture that appeals to me. Torturing men isn't my thing. Naked sweaty men bound and stretched just doesn't do it for me. But that isn't because I hate women. I really, realy like women. It's men I don't care much for. You know?

* * * * *

Nia: I'm so glad you are enjoying the discussion. You sound like what I consider to be an almost mythical creature: a strong, confident woman who enjoys the occasional submissive sex role. You don't ride a unicorn, do you?

What a shame to hear that you have scars from being raised Catholic. How unusual for a religion that is so respectful of women. HAhahahaha. Sorry, Benedict XVI--that was a cheap shot.

Anyway, thanks for joining in. I appreciate your comments, especially since they more-or-less align with my own thoughts and we all love to have people agree with us.

* * * * *

Sloth: Oh my god, you are right. I should have been clearer and asked for torture methods that are also fun to watch. Sitting through 2-hour sermons is equally torturous as having to watch someone sit through a 2-hour sermon. I think I can safely predict that we will never see a GIMP database of 2-hour sermon torture scenes.

* * * * *

And last but certainly not least, a very hearty well done to Stormrider for some strikingly compelling images.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 02:12:35 PM

Name: DHT

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 04:00:44 PM

Name: YikYakker

Sloth wrote: ...although they did not invent it the Puritans perfected a torture method that endures to this day - it's called having to sit through one of their two hour sermons.

Then I guess I should be glad that I was raised Catholic like Nia. Our sermons ran about 15-20 minutes and consisted solely of the priest begging for money.


Nia: I too am glad you find this to be a good place for intelligent discussion and chose to join in. We may disagree about things at times, but everyone here puts a lot of thought behind what they write.

I don't mean to bore everyone with my long, windy essays, but I hope you all will indulge me one more time while I address a question posed by...

John Galt who wrote: I would like you to explore what "fear" you think drives sexual repression. I would suspect it is a fear of losing power and influence. But when did that fear translate to hatred of women? What, exactly, is the connection between repressing sex and suppressing women? Men have sex as well.

Anyone who can definitively answer those questions would likely win a Nobel prize. There are lots of theories; here's one to consider: In societies that offer few options or opportunities, life often involves a choice between controlling or being controlled. It's not hard to imagine men in pre-historic times using their physical advantages to assert control, rather than hand that control over to women. Eventually, that control was buttressed by layering on social, political, legal and even mythical ideas to perpetuate those advantages. (I'm reminded of the line in the movie The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean when one of the characters, narrating the story, says, "Then women got the vote, and everything went to hell." It was played for laughs, but probably touches on the fear of change and loss of control that many men must have felt at the time.)

To some extent, "emancipation" has been associated with loosening of sexual norms. The "free love" espoused in the 1960s was not entirely new; a similar trend occurred during the Roaring 20s, when women showed more skin and began to scoff at the limitations placed on their "fun". I don't think it's a coincidence that this era emerged not long after women attained the right to vote.

As to why men would have wanted to restrict women's sexual behavior, when they themselves enjoy it? That feeling of loss of control. If you had a wife or girlfriend who was trying on every dick in town, you would have to be an extremely tolerant fellow to allow that to go on for long. Marriage probably was initiated as means of shutting off other men's access to your woman (or your woman's access to other men). Remember chastity belts? Neither do I, but I've heard of them. But that was also wrapped up in property considerations: men considered women as part of their property, and any legitimate sons they bore would inherit the rest. Back in the day illegitimacy was a messy affair that could lead to violence, and among the wealthy and politically powerful, even war.

Throughout history, much of human knowledge about sex consisted of superstition and lore - information passed along verbally from generation to generation - until science and education either proved or debunked most of these beliefs. But even today, there are some naïve schoolgirls who believe their boyfriends when they say, "If we do it standing up, you won't get pregnant." More mythology.

BTW, isn't it odd that humans have established social hierarchies based on some physical characteristics like gender, race - and even, some researchers say, on physical height (sorry, Ralphus) - while ignoring other obvious ones like eye color, hair color and nose shape?

We humans have one foot stuck in the past and another in the present. The more we understand about how we arrived here, the sooner we'll be able to unload the excess baggage.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 08:12:47 PM

Name: Covers
Homepage URL:

I've gotta say that Stormrider's Poser work is the best I've ever seen. So far, every one of these images is good enough to go into my very selective favorites folder.

Thanks for being a perverted artistic genius, Stormrider!

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 10:13:56 PM

Name: YikYakker

Nia wrote: Stormrider's horse had a sharp metal point which would be like sitting on a knife. Ouch! And her hands were tied behind her, which means all of her weight is permanently placed in one spot. With the AOH position, one can at least pull herself up for some temporary relief.

Now right there is an example of why we like to get a woman's point of view on these things. What you've said reminds me of a recent post by either Jane or Margot describing Jane's experience shooting the horse scene in Maleficarum. JJ was not happy with having Jane's arms tied straight because he felt it would look too much like she was holding herself up. Instead, Jane was tied so that her elbows were bent at an angle. That not only looked more painful, it surely must have felt that way to Jane. That's another reason why we admire her so much: her devotion to her art.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 10:22:28 PM

Name: MeetThePryz
Homepage URL:

Next month's Attackers movies looks like their worst month in a very long while. I don't think I'm interested in a single one of the movies.

Quite a bit from this month that I'm interested in watching, though, particularly Slave Investigator 2.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 11:20:49 PM

Name: John Galt

YikYakker wrote: Remember chastity belts? Neither do I, but I've heard of them.

Maybe it has been an uneventful day, but that's the best laugh I've had today. Thanks.

* * * * *

A Canadian: Here's that Aubrie review I mentioned. I'm pretty sure this sequence is not on the DVD I mentioned, but this gives you some idea of what Aubrie looks like and how she responds to Steve's, umm, ministrations.

* * * * *

Aubrie - Anal Trained (Powershotz, 2011)

This video clip is a little over 24 minutes long and features 18 year old cutie, Aubrie.

We begin with Aubrie already bound on her hands and knees on the "anal training bench." Her ankles are leather strapped together and her wrists are leather strapped together and attached to the front of the bench. She is already looking apprehensive and vulnerable, which is promising.

In a really nice touch, the Masked Man stands in front of her and pulls on a pair of latex gloves, snapping them for emphasis. Sadly, Aubrie looks off to the side and smiles like she is amused by the theatrics. So right away we lose some of GIMP feel in the scene. But don't lose hope.
Aubrie smirks
There is the standard finger exploration between her legs and random butt smacking, then squirting oil onto her back and down her crack, followed by rubbing the oil into her back, over her ass, and back and forth between her legs, working it into her pussy and anus. Once again, Aubrie is smiling during this procedure, which almost makes me despair. But I keep watching. And fortunately as the Masked Man's latex-gloved fingers slip deep into her pussy, we begin to see some surprise on Aubrie's face. It's also gratifying the way her toes curl and her feet flex.
Aubrie massaged and fingered
About 6 minutes in, the Masked Man picks up a lube-filled injector, slides it into her ass, and pumps in a goodly amount of lubricant. The Masked Man assures her it is for her own good. Heh. Aubrie reacts nicely, but it is over all too quickly.
Aubrie injected with lube
More pussy and ass massaging follows, during which Aubrie grimaces and breathes heavily and begins to look genuinely discomfited. Finally. And about 7 and half minutes in, we get our first sudden edit cut as Aubrie cries out and twists her torso to escape the Masked Man's anal violation.

The finger violation continues with Aubrie crying out, whimpering, twisting her ass away and sitting back to escape the Masked Man's ministrations. Aubrie is smirking no more. The finger sodomy goes on until the 10 minute mark, at which point the Masked Man shows Aubrie the glass rod, has her suck on it, and asks her if she knows what it is for. She declines to answer but you can tell she knows.
Aubrie and the glass rod, Part 1
So at the 10:30 minute mark, the Masked Man squirts oil into Aubrie's crack once again and brandishes the glass rod. Aubrie looks like she is about to cry. She breathes heavily as the rod slides up and down between her ass cheeks and we get an expression of impending discomfort. All in all, a very nice build-up. The Masked Man tells her to relax and then slowly pushes the conical end of the glass rod up her ass. Aubrie looks anything but relaxed.

At about the 12:30 minute mark, the Masked Man violates Aubrie with the other end of the glass rod. We are treated to more struggling, heavy breathing, and twisting and turning as the Masked Man sodomizes Aubrie. The Masked Man pulls the rod out and shoves it back in several times before he just starts fucking her ass with it. She jumps and cries out and rolls her eyes and pretty much fulfills my perverse expectations. Also, Aubrie maintains eye contact with the front camera for most of her ordeal, which is quite enjoyable. She is very expressive.
Aubrie and the glass rod, Part 2
We finish up with a quick tour of Aubrie's body and a zoom-in on her pussy and asshole. Then we fade out just right before the 15 minute mark. From this point on we get to see the whole ordeal once again, but from another camera angle--a front/side-on shot. Once again we see a smirking Aubrie but this time we know what's coming to wipe that smirk from her pretty round face.

This alternate camera angle is all a single-camera sequence. We mostly see Aubrie's facial expressions and body contortions and none of the actual penetration shots. It is actually quite a compelling view, and might have been a great video clip all by itself. I would have been disappointed not to see any penetration shots at all, though.
Aubrie alternate camera angle
SUMMARY: Cute young Aubrie is bound on her hands and knees on the anal training bench. She is spanked, explored, fingered, oiled, lubed, and sodomized using both the bulb end and the conical end of the glass rod. And then we get to see it all over again from a front/side-on single camera viewpoint.

This is a standard Powershotz video production, with excellent bright lighting and crisp sound. There is a red light source and a green light source that I did not think added anything to the shoot, and at times was kind of distracting--say, for instance, when the Masked Man walked in front of one of them and Aubrie was suddenly red-hued or green-hued. There were a few times when the split screen was unnecessary, as all the action was taking place on a single camera. But dedicating almost the entire second half of the clip to a single-camera view of the same shoot was a nice touch. Yes, that means there was only about 15 total different minutes of Aubrie being painfully sodomized, but it was a very nice 15 minutes.

While I was initially put off by Aubrie's smirking, in retrospect it kind of heightened the experience when we reached the point where she had nothing to smirk about any more. Aubrie's reactions were very natural, and she was obviously enduring pain and discomfort (and, you know, being paid for it). This is the Powershotz experience I enjoy most, and why I keep coming back. I love that reality aspect.

I think Aubrie's anal violation was easily a B- production, and that's not a "low B" so much as "better than a high C." This video clip delivers. It is available from the Powershotz store for download for only $14.

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 11:56:28 PM

Name: MrAnthony

@ John Galt: Your movies reviews are fun to read, but your hatred of the Roman Catholic church is off-base and again, does not do your intellect justice. Tortures existed long before the Christian church, including whipping, crucifixtion, burning, rape, etc. I'm still waiting for the Biblical citation on menstruation being a punishment for Original Sin. The fact that people will use religion (or politics, race, etc) as an excuse for their behavior does not automatically condemn religion, politics, etc. It is an intellectual mistake to make the weaknesses/hang-ups of individuals the same as the hang-ups of institutions.

The plain and simple fact is that without some civilizing influences--family, religion, laws, science being examples--we would be no more than animals, with the strong taking from the weak (hint: most of us would be prey for those dumb jocks from high school who picked on anyone not like them), and women being property of a few. We need some laws, rules, and codes of conduct (commonly called "manners") in order for our society to function and more importantly, to grow. Without it, we'd have no art, no cities, no Internet, and no Barbarian Queen.

Insulting Christianity will not make it irrelevant nor make it go away. To its credit, religion usually has a core set of beliefs in a world which is becoming more nihilistic. And frankly, if nothing is ever forbidden or wrong, some of the fun goes away too.

@Nia: Regarding the idea that the problem with the Catholic church is the issue of celibacy, I would respectfully suggest that the problem isn't celibacy itself, but that certain kinds of people are drawn to the idea of being in positions of respect or power so they can exploit others or engage in bad behavior under the cloak of respectability. Being human isn't giving in to urges; being human is the ability to go beyond the urges and do something greater (e.g. instead of running around and attacking women, making a video and living out fantasies is much healthier for everyone).

We all carry scars from our past, whether that's from overly strict parents, old lovers, people who took advantage of our feelings/vulnerabilities, or whatever battles have been fought. Being human means learning from those battles, moving on, and growing. Nietzsche wrote, "That which does not kill us makes us stronger." While he would no doubt be upset at the idea of applying this quote in such a non-nihilistic way (although probably pleased at the concept of religion causing scars), there is no doubt that we are all shaped by, and victims of, our own past and of our own society. To a large extent, it is up to each of us individually to choose whether to grow beyond these scars, simply live with them, or carry them as scarlet letters (how's that for a Puritan reference?).

Thursday, October 6th 2011 - 11:57:49 PM

Name: A Canadian

MeetThePryz wrote:

Next month's Attackers movies looks like their worst month in a very long while. I don't think I'm interested in a single one of the movies.

I had the exact same reaction. Next month will be a write-off.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 12:28:16 AM

Name: Bill K.

Stormrider another terrific detailed poser art. The only other poser artist that equals your detail work I seen is: is a mkg2k7 that works out of as commission artist. Please keep doing your thing. I still got to ask why no struggle/torture scars? Bill K.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 01:03:45 AM

Name: Stormrider

Wow, thanks for all the enthusiasm and support for my pics. Sorry in advance for the wall of text...

@ Bill K: I've tried using various whipmarks, etc., but (with a few exceptions) I find them to be too gruesome (or too real) for regular use. I myself prefer the "unspioled" fantasy, but I certainly don't begrudge any who prefer their fantasies to be a little more "real". From a strictly technical perspective, they are a real bitch to make convincing.

@ Badger: Thanks. I do love the horse. Makes for great dungeon scenes in my book.

I remember Love Camp 7. What a great movie. They don't seem to make them like that anymore. The horse scene featured one of the hottest women I've ever seen in that type of movie.

@ YikYakker: Thanks, glad you like them. I think Jane did sit on that type of horse (weights and all). I am mildly disappointed in the decision to bind Jane AOH like that. That is mearly my own kink talking, however. I am still stoked for the release of Maleficarum (BATS and rack scene specifically).

@ Covers: Thanks. I'm honored that you would include my work in your "select" folder... I think we all have one of those.

@ Sloth (and Ralphus): Thanks for the kind words. I AM pretty hard on myself when it comes to my art (if I can call it that). I have seen artists (like Quoom and Arcus) that do some amazing things with the tools available to them. Beside them, I am merely a dabbler. That said, I do love making them :) And Sloth, I do occasionally do hanging pics. Again, nothing too gruesome though.

Sorry if I forgot anyone... It's late and I'm tired.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 01:49:48 AM

Name: John Galt

Mr Anthony: There's actually quite a bit of literature disputing that religion has been of any value as far as maintaining civility, some going so far as to blame religion for holding back human development. And that would be religion as an institution, not individuals acting wrongly in the name of religion.

In Nonzero, Robert Wright describes how humans throughout history all share some common behavioral aspects that have evolved over time (and are continuing to evolve), regardless of any specific religious influences.

Erich Fromm, in his seminal Escape From Freedom, deconstructs Catholicism to show how it was designed to suppress free thought and individuality. In addition, he argues that the Protestant religions proceeding from Luther and Calvin emphasized individuality specifically to oppose Catholicism, and was employed to foment anger and hostility in Reformation society. (By the way: These topics are not the point of his book, which is actually an explanation for the rise of Nazism, but they provide necessary background.)

As far as giving credit to religion for being some sort of force for good in the world, The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, God is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens, and The End of Faith by Sam Harris all dispute that, with compelling arguments and examples, complete with plenty of references and end notes. The Necessity of Atheism by Dr David Marshall Brooks is also an incisive critique of religion and its negative impact on humanity, and it is available as a Kindle book FOR FREE.

Personally, I am no more or less disenchanted with Catholicism than any other religion. Since I was raised in America, though, and exposed to Christianity all my life, that is where most of my religious examples come from. And Catholicism, arguably, has committed the most numerous and egregious atrocities of all the Christian sects because, well, it has been around the longest. Nor did I say that Catholicism was the only entity that tortured people, or that they invented every means of torture known to modern man. That they employed those means at all, and with such enthusiasm, is what I find reprehensible. You are correct: I cannot make religion go away, but I can try to deprive it of its halo and persuade people to examine their religious beliefs more closely and dispassionately.

And I did in fact misspeak. Menstruation was not women's eternal punishment for Original Sin. Excruciating pain in childbirth was women's eternal punishment for Original Sin. That and eternal submission to men. You can find that at Genesis 3:16. I'm kind of surprised you didn't know that and correct me.

And finally, I cannot dispute your statement that by arbitrarily demonizing sex, religion in general has probably made it all the more attractive and alluring. The forbidden fruit is so tasty specifically because it is forbidden. Although, to be honest, I think I would still like sex even if it wasn't "forbidden." Would GIMP be as titillating if it was commonplace and not seen as deviant? Possibly not, although I'm not at all sure I like GIMP because it is viewed as deviant and generally considered forbidden. I think I just like it. Knowing that the Political Correctness Police might swoop down and demand ISP records to determine who frequents this site does not enhance my enjoyment of GIMP.

I do believe that demonizing sex is an "artificial sin" though. It is also a sin to kill--a REAL sin to my way of thinking--and I have absolutely no desire to kill anyone just because it is forbidden. Except that guy who recorded that really annoying web advertisement where he says, in a loud and irritatingly nasal voice, "Congratulations! You won!" I am sorely tempted to track him down and kill him every time I hit a web page and have to jump to turn down my speakers because of his uninvited auditory intrusion. In fact, I might even make an exception to my only-women-in-GIMP rule and enjoy watching him drawn and quartered, or subjected to some other painful torment.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 03:14:17 AM

Name: Matt

Stormrider: Excellent work! Especially Thursday's with the prisoner forced to watch her cellmate be raped, and with the dual hanging today. Well done, and please, continue with the good work!

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 03:20:39 AM

Name: High Horse
E-mail address:

Here's a fun GIMP scene for you. Played for laughs, but you can't beat a good topless buzzsaw scene!

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 06:00:31 AM

Name: YikYakker
Homepage URL:

Covers has a nice new scan from a previously featured paperback entitled Big Orvie. It's a bit tame by GIMP standards but I really like it. Maybe it's the tattered red dress.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 07:57:33 AM

Name: Sloth

Ralphus - you are too good to me - today's pic is proof like no other that God does exist and he speaks to us through the Gimp Forum - and that calls for another Amen.

Stormrider - being as big as I am on artwork the gruesome factor is secondary - the being well done issue is primary and your work certainly is that - and once done on whatever medium is used our victim never gets old - probably why I'm the big MAM's collector in this bunch - thanks so much.

MeetThePryz and A Canadian - I had the same thoughts concerning the newest Attackers releases - placed an order yesterday from the archives on some older titles and am hoping they are still in stock - perhaps I'll get lucky on a Yuka Haneda title.

John Galt - as always thanks for the review - based on content it would be a view - now if we could just convince her to be rid of the electrodes on her ears and the trailer hitch on her tongue we might have a complete winner.

Stay well all

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 09:26:55 AM

Name: YikYakker

As someone who was raised Catholic and attained the status of "fallen Catholic" decades ago, I think my experiences (and age) have helped me to see the situation from different perspectives.

The thing I remember about my youthful exposure to the faith was the overwhelming emphasis on suffering. My school and house of worship were rife with statues and pictures of the Man being stripped, whipped and tortured.

We were compelled to read a book called Lives of the Saints, which contained a number of passages that could have been taken from the GIMPer's Manual. (Ironically, some of the martyrs depicted in that book - not all saints were martyrs - were Christians who were victimized by non-Christians).

The prayers and rituals we learned were full of imagery (sometimes very poetic and vivid) about pain and suffering. It seemed like there was a masochistic/sadistic thread running through the whole process.

Now I've been out of the loop a long time, but I'm pretty sure Catholicism has gone through some changes since those dark ages. And I'm not going to say that the religion turned me into a GIMPer; I firmly believe that I have been a GIMPer since the day the doctor held me up by my toes and slapped my ass. (One might consider it a gift from God; but I won't go there).

My point is that the atmosphere in which I grew up provided a lot of fuel for my GIMPish fantasies. (I should clarify that in my pre-pubescent years, I was an equal-opportunity GIMPer. In my adult years, I began to wonder if there wasn't also a homo-erotic aspect to Catholicism.)

I have dozens of family members who are still Catholic, and they are good people and decent citizens. I respect them and I respect their beliefs, although I don't understand the women-folk in my clan. To me, being a female Catholic seems a lot like being a member of Democrats for Palin. But, whatever.

While Catholism has its problems, it is far from the worst institution in America, or the world. Other religions, and other political, economic and ideological systems, are also rife with oppressive practices.

Still, I believe that there is only a small percentage of truly evil people (I've worked for a few of them) but even a few can cause major problems.

While John Galt focuses on the selfish aspects of humans, I tend to look at the folly of our species. (It's like John Galt and I are peeking into the same house, but through different windows). Among our most foolish tendencies is that of following or tolerating evil, manipulative people.

But getting back to the original point of this ongoing discussion - yes, there really was one - given all the real problems in this world, it's a shame that so much time and so many resources are devoted to stamping out the imagery of sexual/violent fantasies. Many religions - and I would specify two, Catholicism and Islam, only because I'm most familiar with them - will need to find a great deal of courage, energy and will to overcome the legacies of violence and oppression of women that they've instilled in the perceptions of others.

Personally, I doubt that they are up to the task.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 10:20:14 AM

Name: Eda
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Great picture of the day. Thanks, Stormrider.

And thanks to High Horse for the link. Several good clips there. Doesn't matter if they're played for laughs, they're still better acting and set up than most.

Lot of activity on the board recently. That's one way to keep Ralphus quiet(er).

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 10:29:23 AM

Name: Jane von Detlefson
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Hey all! I've been a really busy, but I have the first teaser of Maleficarum to show, so...

John Galt - Um... I was making a joke about making dad jokes for 2 hours... obviously I would cover more pertinent issues on the commentary, no worries, I won't turn it into an episode of Mystery Science Theater. Which brings me to...

Ralphus - Thanks for the dad joke, stellar, you're obviously a master of that type of humor. I'm a big fan of puns as well.

So, the horse, eh? Yes, it was painful. I was more or less suspended over the horse before, and then we changed it, so I was really sitting on it. There were a couple of reasons for this, when I was tightly suspended, I could not move at all. The suspension was my trick to not have the horse jammed up... well. When my arms were lowered, it looked better on camera, especially when I tried to lift myself, but couldn't, and with weights on the ankles... the futile struggle was more dramatically pleasing. It also looked more realistic, because it was real. I made the horse with a sharp edge, I didn't sand it, so I had the sharp edge of the wood cleaving me. In addition, I was being whipped. It was a very difficult scene, but I figured I wouldn't die or be horribly wounded, the things I do for art.

I'm really enjoying Stormrider's artwork, some of the scenarios and mechanics of the torture instruments in his tableau are similar to what I designed for Maleficarum.

There was a discussion a while ago about high heels, so I'm going to throw in my two cents, albeit rather late. Personally, I wouldn't think that a victim should be treated with deference regarding the cleanliness of the location, I was dragged through the mud in The Perils of Jane, and dragged across the floor on my face in Agent X. If the room's dirty, use it in the film! Sullying a poor innocent girl on a dirty concrete floor holds a lot of charm for me. My bare feet on the dirty floor of a warehouse, good times. I just feel like it's more realistic. And if someone left me with stiletto heels on, seriously now, they're a weapon. However, my fantasies run to the realistic and degrading.

And regarding the role of women in society, etc... When I starting making films of this nature I told a few of my friends. One of them, a fellow filmmaker, but not of this genre, was shocked, but not in a bad way. He thought that it was really strange that someone he knew, who went to the same small elitist college that he did (with all of the narrow values they hold), would do something like that. He told me that if the feminists at our alma mater found out they would, ironically, stone me in the town square. Another filmmaker friend, a woman, told me that she thought that what I was doing was feminist, because I was challenging the status quo.

As a woman in a modern age, I am happy that what I'm doing is my choice, that I can do what I want in our current society. It's a fantasy that I portray with my work, not a manual on how to live one's life. But it makes me rather angry when the government tries to take away my right to do what I wish with my body. And it saddens me when people can't step out of their narrow values and see that there's nothing wrong with what I do. It's very personal for me, I have these desires, I felt pretty bad about it for some time, and I've been able to break out of that, mostly by sharing my fantasies. I've received major criticism, hurtful criticism, but there's been enough praise and support to balance that out. No matter how I try, I can't grow a thicker skin, but I can hang onto the words of supporters and keep moving forward. Onward and upward!

And in that spirit, here's the first teaser of Maleficarum:

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 11:48:57 AM

Name: Sloth

Wow, a double post day - how odd.

YikYakker - noticed your post on the cover of the day - I see nothing too tame Gimpwise - "He tied her - He locked her up - and used her" - seems the essence of Gimp worthy to me - besides, it has a certain nostalgia for me - as an adolescent running the hills and backwoods of western Kentucky the scene depicted was a common sight at the hovels of my relatives - many had their wives in such a predicament - well, it may have been their sisters or some other close relative - in any case it appears the fruit don't fall far from the tree.

Jane - that teaser trailer is what I call a show - so looking forward to the performances in your film - and hope the sales on release meet expectations.

Stay well all

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 03:14:09 PM

Name: Flintstone

John Galt & Mr Anthony : May I say that, if Congress, despite their differencing ideals and philosophies, were as civil of each other as you guys have been in this very interesting discussion, then I would at least be able to put up with them. Both of you make excellent points and still treat each other with respect instead of name calling and ugliness. We need more GIMPs in Congress!!!

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 04:00:11 PM

Name: Bill K.

Thank you Jane for your great BATS teaser and I look forward to seeing more great teasers. May I ask what is the news on the DVD has to the early release (order by mail to get before Halloween) that was talked about in early post(s)? Bill K.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 08:31:19 PM

Name: Eda
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Jane, I just love it when you tell it like it should be told. If a woman wants to work as a homemaker and raise her kids, and does it, she is a feminist. If a woman wants to make edgy films that portray different aspects of a woman, and does it, then she is a feminist. The only criterion is that the woman do what she wants to do without regard for what society says she can or cannot, should or should not do.

I don't often get political here, since I don't think this is the forum for it, but I'm going to make a very brief exception: I was once a registered Democratic, but Democrats want to get into my pocketbook, and I don't like that. So I became a registered Republican, but Republicans want to get into my bedroom, and I don't like that. So, since I want government out of my pocketbook (except to the very limited extent that we need government in our lives to provide defense, fix the infrastructure and give us clean air and water, things that the private sector could not do on its own), and since I want government out of my bedroom (entirely, completely, no exceptions), I switched again, and am now more happily a registered Libertarian. [End of political rant.]

So thanks, Jane. You are as much a feminist as any woman I know, and provide strength to others to follow their own hearts.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 08:58:38 PM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

+1 to Eda. Tho I'm a registered Democrat, not because I always vote that way, but because way back when I registered to vote right outta high school, and they asked if I was Democrat or Republican, I had no idea what that meant! No idea what the distinction was at the time. So I just picked one...I guessed. And then later on when I learned about the parties, I didn't care and was to lazy to change my registration! I voted for Reagan, I voted for Obama. Technically, I'm an Independent!

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 09:27:50 PM

Name: John Galt

Jane: What a terrific Maleficarum teaser. I hope your comments mean that maybe there will be a commentary track on the DVD. And I also echo Bill K's question about pre-ordering the DVD for perhaps a Halloween arrival. Or would I already know this if I had checked the Red Feline website before posting?

I have all sorts of respect for your choices in filmmaking, and I sympathize with your inability to grow a thicker skin. Sometimes people just suck. Probably most of the time, but I hate to make sweeping generalities... too often.

Interesting tidbit about your experience on the horse. I suspect the only way you could put yourself in such a painful and precarious situation is with the full confidence and trust that your fellow filmmakers were also looking out for you, and assisting you to subject yourself to stressful and potentially dangerous situations. Suffering for your art is fine, but you really need someone there to end it immediately if necessary. It sounds like you have quite a special company, and my hat is off to all of you.

I'm just trying to imagine a commentary track where you are discussing the sharpness of the horse and the different positions you tried and how the horse cleaved your... what word would you use? It seems to me you avoid that, and you always have. I can recall you posting about your "lady parts" once, and in your last post you just said "cleaving me" in your description. I'm thinking it might be highly entertaining to hear your commentary, if only for your word choices and careful phrasing.

* * * * *

Sloth: Yeah, I avoided commenting on all those piercings on Aubrie, but they were a bit off-putting, weren't they? At least she didn't have any huge tattoos--or at least, none showing.

Regarding your comment on YikYakker's link to the Cover of the Day: I read that as He tied her up-- locked her up-- and used her big orvie, and thought to myself, hmm, I don't think I've ever heard of it referred to as a "big orvie" before.

* * * * *

I like the "Countdown to Maleficarum" graphic. Nice work.

Friday, October 7th 2011 - 11:43:20 PM

Name: Bill K.

This both horse and stake (horsebats) torture peril by poser artist mkg2k7 combines the two perils we talking about with Jane and Stormrider.

Put a pyre under these sisters in pain and light it and they would really be in PAIN.

Bill K.

Saturday, October 8th 2011 - 12:57:57 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

My oh my, this place has been hopping. What with all the chatter about which religion invented torture, people oohing and aahing about Stormrider's artworks, a new girl posting to the board, and some little movie about the Inquisition, I haven't been able to get in a word edgewise. But just to please Eda Chang, it's my turn to say a few words. But only just a few.

John Galt: It kind of got lost in the shuffle, but thanks for your latest review. You really like Powershotz's stuff, don't you? From what I understand, Steve's next project is going to be one of those hidden camera shows in a doctor's office of a woman receiving a prostate exam. Actually, there's going to be 2 cameras and he's going to show us the entire procedure from both angles using a split screen. Pretty wild, huh? And I didn't even know women got prostate exams.

You know where to look for your link.


Nia: Welcome to the forum, always nice when kinky chicks come out of hiding and make themselves known. And of course, the rest of the lads love hearing the female perspective. I think that brings our total females up to...4 now. 1196 guys and 4 ladies. Yeah, that's probably about right.


DHT: Very cool clip, thanks. That was quite unexpected when the guy comes up the bound chick and smacks her with a right to the face, then when she mouths off, he punches her with a left. Yeah! That's a big ol' smile right there.


High Horse: Likewise, your clip was a lot of fun. The whirling buzzsaw slowly moving closer between the splayed legs of a screaming damsel in distress. I wonder who was the first to come up with that concept? I could probably do a whole year of daily pics just on that theme alone.


Jane von Detlefson: Ah Jane, what a nice teaser from Maleficarum. PG-rated and YouTube friendly, but still a very nice moment. Scream for me, baby!

It's great to see you back here sharing your opinions and points of view. We all love you here, and of course, anticipation is building with Halloween just 23 days away. Which leads me to...


The Countdown to Maleficarum graphic: My concept, but Scribbler's the one who did all the work and put it together. The picture changes every day. You should see the animated version we started with. I'm still hoping we get to see a final version of that on the board, but at least this should whet our collective appetites for the most anticipated movie of its type since...well, probably since forever.

Saturday, October 8th 2011 - 01:29:03 AM

Name: jessie_davano
E-mail address:

Check out this site for wooden horses.

Saturday, October 8th 2011 - 08:46:54 AM

Name: Baron von Folter
E-mail address:

There has been some discussion of the "best way" to bind a woman on the horse. I would like to submit that the best way is to tie the woman's arms out to each side and tied to a horizontal slack rope. That way she cannot get any leverage to pull herself up and if she does try to pull, it is canceled by the effect of pulling against the loose rope.

Friedrich, Baron von Folter

Saturday, October 8th 2011 - 10:57:59 PM

Name: MaX CoXXX
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:


My latest "Gimp" inspired release


Starring Isobel Wren, Erika Stryker & Lucky Bellagio

Isobel & Erika were on their first big adventure vacation. They wanted to see what the "real" world looked like. So they took a trip to one of those "Stans" countries.

While on their vacation they were taking photos of what they thought was an ancient building. Turns out it was a clandestine prison used by the CIA to torture suspected terrorists & OCCUPY WALL STREET protesters.

The girls were taken inside & tied into a bondage position that was impossible to survive. Isobel's crotch rope connected to Erikas noose. If she did not stand on her tippy toes, she is strangling Erika. Erika's arms were connected to Isobel's noose. If she did not hold up her arms, she strangled Isobel.

The girls held out as long as their bodies could. When they finally died from strangulation, they hung lifeless until their capture cut them down.

Good Hunting


Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 12:48:12 AM

Name: arrakur
E-mail address:

Poll question: The horse is one of the most dastardly vicious torture devices that can be used on a woman. In my opinion, the victim should not be allowed the slightest leverage. Her arms should be at least tied behind her back. And there are more creative ways to increase her punishment, of course.

The following drawing by Gary Roberts is from my private collection, commissioned artwork which I decided to share after enjoying it for some time for myself. It was great fun to imagine and "design" what I like to think of the, possibly, most painful "horse" to be used on the poor woman in that torture-chamber.

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 03:17:03 AM

Name: Matt

Poll Question: Hmm-it's a tossup, but I'd go with the hands behind position. The tied (or chained) hands can be raised, forcing the subject to hunch over and increase the pain in the shoulders. And it can expose the back for application of whips, rubber hoses, or bamboo (or other wooden) sticks in a beating, should that step be deemed necessary. Of course, the subject's breasts and belly would still be accessable to such proceedures before the arms are raised.

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 04:25:21 AM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

re The Horse and the Arms: Tie weights to the ankles, then tie the upper arms to a rope. Heave the rope (and the girl) up, then let her drop. Yee-ouch that sounds like fun!

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 07:32:11 AM

Name: Badger

I vote for hands behind the back. But more, also tie the arms tightly at the elbows. That pushes the chest and all that adorns it out to be admired.

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 11:22:39 AM

Name: Eda
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

I am pleased to announce the posting on my story page of CHOICE ALTERNATIVES 5, the conclusion of the five-part story CHOICE ALTERNATIVES. The last three parts of the story were written by Fritz, who took over my more simple story and brought it to a new level.

For those of you who haven't read any of the story yet, you will find that it combines numerous scenes of capture and severe torture of female spies and double agents (and attractive ones, of course -- photos accompany the story, as they do with all of my stories) with twists in the plot that will keep you guessing until the very end about who is really working for whom.

And for those of you who have already read the first four parts of the story, and have tried to figure out what is really going on, Fritz has provided a very satisfactory ending that answers all the questions. [I confess that I figured out only a part of it.]

I hope that you will enjoy the story, and, if you do (or even if you don't), please let Fritz know your thoughts. He worked very hard on it.

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 11:29:40 AM

Name: MAV
Homepage URL:

On the poll question, I think you guys know where I stand...

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 06:52:35 PM

Name: YikYakker

Exitus Interruptus (2006) [Uncut version]

aka Exit: Death is Only the Beginning

In German, with English subtitles

Movie Info

Tonight I have a special treat for you, boys and girls. A few years ago, this Andreas Bethmann-directed epic earned the highly-coveted Ralphus Award for Best Mainstream Film of the Year, and deservedly so.

It has something for just about every GIMPer's tastes: gratuitous nudity, AOH bondage, barefoot bondage, tit-groping, choking, stabbing, shooting, whipping, copious nudity, snuff, muff, plastic dick rape, non-plastic dick rape, fellatio, chloro, gagging, drugging by syringe and in case I forgot to mention it, abundant nudity. And it even tells a story...

Manuela (Renee Pornero...yeah, and she's really a porn actress) is plagued by nightmares. Quick cutaway scenes of her encounter with a serial killer 5 years ago (in Vegetarians Forced to Lust Part 2, which I have not seen) appear in her dreams - we see them as flashbacks at the start of the movie and throughout.

Renee Pornero as Manuela in Vegetarians Forced to Lust, Part 2

Traumatized such that she can no longer have sex with men, she seeks comfort with cute girlfriend/lover Monique (Anne Gebels).

They rendezvous later at a club for some recreational therapy. Manuela heads to the ladies' room (without her girlfriend - now that's got to be a first). While she's on the crapper, two lezzies come in and start getting jiggy in the adjacent stall.

That's when the villain - unseen except for his shoes and hands - enters the ladies' room. He plunges a huge knife through the partition, into and through the torso of the brunette. The second girl, a busty blonde, attempts to flee, but the bad guy beats her head against a wall until she collapses to the floor.

He gags her with tape (that skinny European kind), pulls out a knife, cuts through her clothing, and then shoves the knife right into her shaved pussy (explicitly shown). Yow.

Manuela tries the old if-I-get-up-on-the-lid-and-crouch-he-won't-know-I'm-here trick. Doesn't work. First her neck is ensnared by a noose, then she gets the chloroform treatment.

Monique, unaware of what's happened, has to suddenly leave the club, because....well I won't bore you with that detail. The villain (whom I will henceforth call "Bertucci" - that's the pseudonym of the actor who portrays him) drags Manuela out of the restroom.

(Allow me to pause here to explain that Bertucci's modus operandi for the remainder of the movie is to drug his victims via syringe to render them unconscious as he moves them from one scenario to another. Back to the show.)

Manuela awakes to find herself lying face-up on the floor of a cramped, decrepit room with boarded windows and a door nailed shut. She is still clothed but her feet are bare and her ankles are chained together about 2-3 feet off the ground. The room is decorated with numerous small baby dolls suspended by barbed wire.

Bertucci enters, wearing a black mask, and subjects Manuela to a series of humiliations. He unbuttons her blouse and gropes her exposed tits. He tosses her a roll of toilet paper so she can relieve herself while he watches. He gives her a damp washcloth to cleanse herself - including her pussy - in his presence. He eventually strips her, ties her AOH facing the wall, and whips her a few times on the butt.

Then he produces his dead brother's skeleton, dressed in denim and sporting a plastic dick.

As Manuela lies naked on the floor, her ankle chained to the wall, Bertucci uses his brother to molest and fuck her.

In what I would guess is an insert, the plastic dick is shown penetrating a pussy repeatedly. Manuela's reactions are shown while this is going on.

Meanwhile, Monique gets a message that purports to be from Manuela, asking her to come to a particular address (which turns out to be Bertucci's lodging).

When Monique arrives, the villain knocks her out, then strips, gropes, fondles her and ties her AOH. He taunts her with baby doll holding a knife. He runs the knife along her body, from neck and breasts to thighs and groin. Then he produces a syringe and plunges it into her crotch (implied).

In the next scene, Manuela is tied to a dining room chair, wearing an LBD that Bertucci has provided for her. Naked, zombified Monique arrives with Bertucci's "brother" in a wheelchair and begins to serve dinner. At the table sits Bertucci's dead mother. Monique obeys the villain's every order; she gets under the table to munch on Manuela's muff and then suck the brother's plastic dick.

Apparently, one of the best ways to torment a lesbian is to make her watch while her lover sucks a cock, even a fake one. Manuela becomes sick and hurls. For her punishment she is drugged and taken back to her room.

She awakens to find herself naked and ankle-chained once again.

Monique is also there, on a couch, with her hands bound to her feet and wearing nothing but a vacant stare. Manuela next faces the anguish of watching Monique suck the villain's cock and then bend over to take a reaming from behind.

When Monique revives and the drug has worn off, she finds herself tied in a kind of spread position, on a couch wearing only panties.

Above her, a handgun is hanging from the ceiling, positioned to fire at Monique's pussy. It's wired to a timer and a weight that is set to pull the trigger.

The masked torturer offers Manuela a deal: suck him and get him off in thirteen seconds and Monique's life will be spared. This time it's Monique's turn to beg her lover not to do it. This is the most suspenseful blowjob I've ever seen. Manuela gets the job done and a face full of cum for her effort - but it's too late for poor Monique.

Manuela's got her mouth on Bertucci's dick and her eyes on the timer

Bertucci then ties Manuela in a spread position and suspends a bucket above her that slowly drips water on her pussy. He offers her a deal - if she can endure this for seven hours without asking him to "do anything" for her, he'll let her go.

We get close up shots of her pussy, and the rest of her body as she struggles to keep her sanity. Eventually, she gives in and begs him to help her. Bertucci sticks his finger in her pussy, then gets one of the baby dolls and uses one of its legs like a dildo. Too bad for Manuela.

Afterwards, Manuela feels shame because she was unable to hold out, was manipulated by Bertucci, and should never have believed his promise to let her go.

She also feels rather uncomfortable in her nether region.

The rest of the movie involves Manuela's attempt to extricate herself from the situation. In most situations of this type, the girl would get loose, find some clothing (conveniently, getting her own garments back), and retain a shred of dignity during the breakout. Fortunately, that's not the case here - she spends the entire escape attempt sequence nekkid as a jaybird.

I won't spoil the ending for you, but it does set up a sequel. Oh wait, there is a sequel.

Movie pluses: All of the above is well done. The leading ladies give fine performances. The villain is cruel, sinister and manipulative. The movie is a rare blend of horror, sex, violence and bondage. The electronic score is repetitive but effectively chilling.

Movie minuses: Hate to quibble, but the villain's mask and Norman Bates-like mom complex are a bit of a turn-off. Some of the scenes were very dark, and with his mask and black clothing, Bertucci sometimes seems to melt into the background, a disembodied voice. The mask may make him look creepy or silly, depending on your point of view. Once his identity is revealed, the mask no longer serves any purpose. He's also completely bonkers. His dead mother sits in a rocking chair and "speaks" to him. And I mentioned his fucking brother.

It seems that Bethmann tried to make Pornero's character appear timid and mousy by using unflattering lighting, little or no make-up and ill-fitting clothes (which she doesn't stay in for very long, thankfully). I liked Pornero's raven hair and piercing blue eyes; but sweet-faced and slender Gebels was the more attractive victim, IMO. Pornero was about 27 when she made this movie, but she looks older; maybe that's what happens when you do almost two hundred movies on your knees with a cock in your mouth.

That said, I think a lot of GIMPers will enjoy this. It's the kind of movie many of us have clamored for: no-holds barred, non-stop perversion wrapped inside a plot.

There are a few major differences between the uncut and the "director's cut" (edited) versions; the uncut version includes hard core inserts, Pornero's fellatio cum shot scene, explicit displays of pussy (tortured and otherwise) and dick (plastic and otherwise), the entire Chinese water pussy-torture sequence, just to name a few that come to mind. It may be easier to find the shorter (by 21 minutes) edited version, in which case you will miss the aforementioned goodies, but still find yourself with a decent GIMPage flick.

I just wish I could tell you where to find it. Exploited Cinema once carried it, as did Amazon in days of yore. But it is well worth the hunt.
My Grade: A-

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 10:10:17 PM

Name: A Canadian

YikYakker: Great job on the review and caps of Exitus Interruptus. That movie sounds a little F'd up, and yet I could see myself enjoying it. Unfortunately, if those of you in the land of the free don't think you can find a copy, I'm quite certain I'll never find one.


Eda wrote:

...please let Fritz know your thoughts. He worked very hard on it.

I guess this solves the mystery of whatever happened to Fritz.

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 10:28:07 PM

Name: John Galt

YikYakker: Excellent review of Exitus Interruptus. It sounds incredibly intriguing, even though it may not be available. I'll have to put this one my list of flicks to be on the lookout for. Some movies just deserve to be watched once at least. Especially ones that have so much GIMP goodness, and in so many variations. Thanks for the heads-up!

Sunday, October 9th 2011 - 11:15:00 PM

Name: Bill K.

Love the new Stormrider BATS picture but there no mercy blindfolds for burning witches. I hope there is a fiery sequel to this BATS picture. As to the poll I vote hands chained/tied behind her back for raised arms pull up on the pectoral muscles tending to flatting out the breasts. Specially on BB cup or smaller size breasts it's a bummer to me.

Bill K.

Monday, October 10th 2011 - 01:15:54 AM

Name: Sloth

Poll - hands behind - that way there is no leverage of any kind and no respite no matter how short - just make sure those ankle weights are heavy enough.

Ralphus - I agree, lose the blindfolds - if I'm not mistaken our executioner on the right already has his torch and is lighting up.

YikYakker - ditto your grade on "Exitus" - good film from Bethmann - I obtained a copy several years back but cannot recall the source - the last couple years have been on a quest for "Exitus II" to no avail - I'm not sure it's even available for the Euro market - very nice review - thanks.

Stay well all

Monday, October 10th 2011 - 12:06:56 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

YikYakker: Well, you've been teasing us for seemingly months about an Exitus Interruptus review, and the long wait was worth it. Very entertaining to read, and of course, I loved all the cool vidcaps this time. A few years ago, I did give this film the Ralphus Award for Best Mainstream Film of the Year, and the version I saw was mainstream, but the really, the "good" version (which you reviewed) is clearly hardcore. Those of you seeking this film out, DO NOT buy the Director's Cut. It may be from the director, but the key word here is CUT. It's edited. Badly edited. How you can tell for sure is that there's no hardcore blow job scene, which severely mutes the impact of the best scene in the movie, where the cute blonde chick gets shot in the pussy.

Of course, as you noted, you can't really buy either version of this film online from any reputable source, so my advice is to seek it out online as a download. Hey, it's not available any other way, and you're denying yourself a great GIMP movie otherwise.

The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.


Blindfolds and BATS: As much as I love Stormrider's stuff, I'll agree with the others that blindfolds have no place in this latest artwork. Absolutely no reason to have the girls fact, this is one of those situations where you want them to have their eyes wide open so they see what's about to happen to them. I'm a firm believer in seeing the victim's scared eyes, and I can think of very few instances where a blindfold would be preferable in any bondage situation. Anyone else have an opinion on this?


Eda Chang: Congratulations on the new story. What, are you such a big shot author now that you don't even have to write your own stories anymore, you just farm off your sequels to other writers? Speaking of which, I think this explains what happened to Fritz, who hasn't been around for months. What, you got him locked up in your palatial estate, chained to a desk and kneeling over a typewriter on the floor? Girl, I'm sorry, that's just wrong. The roles should be reversed here. When Fritz comes back, I'm gonna have to show him the proper way to treat an Asian slave.

Monday, October 10th 2011 - 09:44:17 PM

Name: YikYakker

Hey guys, thanks for the comments about my review of Exitus Interruptus.

As Ralphus noted, it took a long time for me to wrap this one up; so long, in fact, that the link to Exploited Cinema that was embedded in the review has changed. At first, the link took you to the page for Exitus Interruptus, and the sad news that the movie was out of stock.

But now if you click on the link, you come to their page for Exitus II. Yeah, and they are selling it at a discount. So here's that link again:

Exploited Cinema

From the description, it tells the story of Monique's sister, who is trying to find out what happened to her. Renee Pornero is also in the movie, but does not have first billing.

Monday, October 10th 2011 - 10:24:40 PM

Name: Fritz
Homepage URL:

Ralphus wrote about Eda:

What, are you such a big shot author now that you don't even have to write your own stories anymore...

Yes, she is. Rumor has it she's on the 2012 Pulitzer short list.

Ralphus also wrote:

Speaking of which, I think this explains what happened to Fritz, who hasn't been around for months. What, you got him locked up in your palatial estate, chained to a desk and kneeling over a typewriter on the floor? Girl, I'm sorry, that's just wrong.

Oh the humanity... the suffering... that woman is merciless. Actually, I'm chained up in Eda's palatial estate because it's the first stage in my complex plan to abduct her and chain her up in my palatial estate. Things went awry when she made me write stories for my daily ration of kibble bits.

Sorry to have vanished for most of the summer. I really just wanted to take some time away from being online, but come August I was clobbered with some unexpected medical issues and my absence was no longer by choice. Things are better now, so not only was I able to finish Choice Alternatives, but I can start posting here again.

And speaking of Choice Alternatives, my thanks to Eda for letting me appropriate her plot and characters to continue the tale, and for selflessly promoting the last few instalments. Admittedly, the story is not for everyone, but for those who like a no-holds-barred GIMP tale which is still wrapped in a recognizable narrative, please check it out. Together, all five parts make Choice Alternatives a veritable GIMP novella. As Eda mentioned, it wasn't easy - but I think I can safely say we both had fun writing it.

Since I'm shamelessly plugging my own work, I might add that John of PKF fame has filmed another of my custom scripts, the third in the Deadly Interrogation series. Those of you who have seen the first two will know what you are in for, but for others, the preview pics should provide enough hints as to whether this clip is for you. There's no electro-torture this time, so those who complained about the sparks in DI-2 will be happy, but the proceedings are still as grim as always. The best thing about DI-3 is that it features Nicole Oring as the ill-fated heroine - and she does an absolutely outstanding job.

YikYakker: Thanks for the first-rate review of Exitus Interruptus. In my opinion, this is Bethmann's second best film (after K3: Prison of Hell). Bear in mind I have not seen Exitus II or Terror Creek (his most recent film), but I've watched most all his other stuff. Had I not already bought Exitus Interruptus, I would have done so immediately after reading your review and viewing your vid-caps.

And most likely, after watching it, I would have felt just as I did after seeing it a few years ago: frustrated. It does have some incredible GIMP scenes. The actresses are far more attractive than those in Bethmann's earlier efforts. And he's come a long way technically: better photography, editing and effects in particular. But for reasons I can't articulate, he doesn't quite hit the sweet spot for me with this one. I wish I could better explain why I feel this way, but although everything about the video seems to cater to my interests, the sum of its parts still falls short. Perhaps it is the wonky pseudo-Psycho plot, or the claustrophobic, domestic settings... but something misses the mark. On the other hand, K3, which follows a conventional WIP storyline in a lush, jungle locale seems far superior.

By the way, the original Exitus Interruptus is still available here. And the sequel is on Amazon Germany here.

Poll: Arms overhead... definitely. Not only is it aesthetically preferable (a subjective opinion) but practically, it helps keep the victim where she belongs: on the damn horse. Has anyone realized that if a woman's arms are tied behind her back while straddling the inverted V, she can, at some additional discomfort, fall to one side and escape whatever pain is being inflicted on her nether regions? Sure, her tormentor can watch closely to make sure this doesn't happen... but if he's the only one on the job and it's time to grab a coffee or take a leak, his lovely pigeon could really make a mess of things.

Blindfolds: That's a tough choice for me. I want to see my victim's eyes as she suffers, but a blindfold or hood adds a note of realism which elevates the scene. I guess it depends on the context.

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 12:02:12 AM

Name: Stormrider

Whoops, just got my internet working again and... CONTROVERSY :D

I posted that pic about two years ago on Renderotica and got pretty much the same response about the blindfolds. "Blah, Blah what's with the blindfolds?" All I can say is that (at the time) it seemed to go well with the scene (and I just acquired that particular toy and wanted to try it out). An experiment of sorts. I am happy to inform you all that I have learned my lesson. And no, I haven't put them in since...

re: Horse and arm binding... arms behind is the way to go. A close second is as jhlipton suggests: AOH and drop.

WOOT, Jane likes my artwork. Wow, I'm honored. I humbly request another teaser (that one was awesome)...God, this month is dragging. Anxiously awaiting Halloween release.

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 12:03:51 AM

Name: Matt

Blindfolds: how many times has this come up? Seems like at least once a year this issue comes up. Anyway, here's my two cents: There are appropriate situations to blindfold the subject(s). In individual settings, the subject can be blindfolded for several reasons: first, to disorient the subject, second, to prevent her from seeing what's happening and knowing what's coming next, third, to prevent her from ID'ing the interrogator(s); and fourth, it also prevents her from determining time of day-important if the session is strung out over several days.

In a group situation, all of the above appply, with with this added twist: if all are blindfolded, then the subjects won't know who's being taken into interrogation and they won't know which one the guards are selecting after one is finished. And of course, if the subjects are going to be executed following the interrogations, a blindfold is mandatory in this instance-especially if the method is hanging, beheading, or shooting.

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 03:28:37 AM

Name: petelobo

Being a fan of longer-lasting events--I find the idea of breaking up a toy when you've finally got a nice one to be wasteful and both aesthetically and practically unappealing-- I think the key to my response to the poll is "AOH and let her raise herself as often as she wishes. That brings home the horrible truth eventually: There IS no comfortable position--at least not for long. You can get the nice stretching effect that AOH gives without the leverage by clipping wrist cuffs to the back of a neck collar, right wrist to left ring and vice-versa. That gives you the AOH without any external support at all.

Also, I like the idea of a nice deep dildo (or two) pinning my butterfly in place (kind of hard to roll from side-to-side while the sharp edge works its agonies. Then some whipping to produce movement, or some electro on the dildo or a wire along the top edge would add some extra spice.

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 05:22:32 AM

Name: Sloth
Homepage URL:

With the publication of today's Stormrider pic it's time to go public with a major announcement - Ralphus, Stormrider and I have entered into a limited partnership in a business enterprise and others may want to get in on the ground floor - the concept is a chain of "Gimp Fitness Centers" - today's pic is our vision for the "massage therapy" section - we admit some difficulties with the "tanning salon" section as depicted in the several BATS scenes that have been depicted - those flames just seem to give the tan look a bit too quickly but rest assured we'll make it work - investors can seek out the IPO on the NYSE, symbol "GIMP" - those seeking their own franchise can contact us here on the forum.

So I'm seeking some films on Amazon and I stumble across this one at the above link the other day - don't know anything about the bunch who produced it but it certainly seems to be some old school sleaze - unsure whether to pull the trigger on this one or not - more research necessary.

Stay well all

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 09:12:36 AM

Name: Flavius

Poll Arms behind back or AOH?

in my opinion arms behind the back is the better torture but the AOH Variant emphasis the body. And the alars are very sensitive ....

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 11:49:46 AM

Name: BlueDog

We have Fritz to thank for me delurking. I purchased Deadly Interrogation 3 and I was very impressed. Gag fans might not be so thrilled as there is a LOT of screaming, but personally that works for me. Nicole sells the story better than any actress I've seen in a long time. I have to admit, that my jaded eyes, having seen GIMP movies for a long time, were moved a bit.

While your there at nicheclips, you might want to check out Hogtie Killer 1, starring Janice. Dunno if it's also published by PKF - it might be found in The Basement or Dirty Deeds. I think it has one of the best forced blowjob scenes I've ever seen. And Janice is pretty hot.

Finally, as a whipping fan, I'm pretty happy with the clips found here ( I think they are made by the paingate folks, but they are pretty high quality, good lighting, hot girls on the cheap. Check it out

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 12:01:59 PM

Name: Bman
E-mail address:

Have to unlurk to say wow to Stormriders art. Keep em cumming. As to the AOH or behind the back issue I vote for AOH overall. It exposes the sensitive underarm areas to whatever punishment is decided upon. Especially as a prelude to breast and pussy torture. Sort of like foreplay. I would agree that Stormrider should "mark" up his subjects a little but he is a close second to Damian if you ask me.

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 12:10:31 PM

Name: John Galt

I have no opinion on arms vis-a-vis horse positions because the torment doesn't really do that much for me. I can think of much better things to do with a captive woman whose legs are forcibly spread. Now, today's Stormrider image of a rack-stretched babe is different. That's a torment I kind of enjoy seeing. A fine sheen of perspiration beading up on her tremulous breasts is the only improvement I can think of. But that doesn't stop it from being a kick-ass GIMP masterpiece as it is.

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 12:49:03 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

Fritz wrote:

Things are better now, so not only was I able to finish Choice Alternatives, but I can start posting here again.

I'm glad to hear that you're better and that you have returned. Welcome back.


John Galt wrote:

I have no opinion on arms vis-a-vis horse positions because the torment doesn't really do that much for me.

Same here. It's not my thing.

For that matter, I don't have any interest in burning-at-the-stake scenes, either. What kind of weirdo gets off on stuff like that?

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 06:13:01 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

A Canadian wrote:

For that matter, I don't have any interest in burning-at-the-stake scenes, either. What kind of weirdo gets off on stuff like that?

Guys, guys! Come on now. If the football team can co-exist with the glee club, if Christians and atheists can live together peaceably, if Democrats and Republicans can be civil toward each other and even pass laws in Congress (okay, I know, that's pushing it), then why can't the rape men and the torture men all just get along? Let's celebrate diversity, my brothers! Some of us prefer to tie girls up and rape them, others prefer to watch them suffer. Really now, it's all good. Good for us, that is. For them, it sucks, but then, we don't care, do we? Hee hee.

Weirdos? Hey, we're all weirdos. Call us whatever you like. Weirdos, perverts, creepers, degenerates, sick fucks. If we weren't, we wouldn't all be here, would we? Somebody say Hallelujah!

(all together now) HALLELUJAH!

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 09:47:47 PM

Name: A Canadian

Ralphus wrote:

Somebody say Hallelujah!

I may be, uh, preaching to the choir ... but let's just pray that when we get to the Promised Land in about 20 days' time, we find the whipping scenes have been done right.

Tuesday, October 11th 2011 - 11:44:13 PM

Name: Matt

Re: today's picture; Well Done, Stormrider!

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 03:20:59 AM

Name: YikYakker

Picture of the Day: A judge once famously said, "I don't know what art is, but I know what I like." This I like.

A naked woman being executed in front of a throng of jeering/cheering people? That's brilliant.

With the NBA on hiatus, maybe a show staged like this will jack up the TV ratings.


Poll Question: Arms behind the back or AOH?

The "arms behind back" faction makes a good case for that method being more painful. However, the degree of pain a fantasy woman might conceivably feel is not that important to me. I'm more interested in how she looks and acts in the situation. Overall, I tend to like seeing women stretched out, so AOH would be my preference. But as long as the girl is hot and convincing, it doesn't really matter to me.

Which is another one of my long, drawn out ways of saying I'm sitting on the fence. Hey, now there's an idea for a torture...


Fritz: Welcome back, and thanks for locating those sources for Exitus Interruptus and Exitus II. I hate writing reviews of movies that folks can't get their hands on.


Sloth: That business venture sounds intriguing to me. What the hell, the stuff I'm invested in now isn't doing anything.

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 10:45:35 AM

Name: Flintstone

To YikYakker: I believe you are referring to a statement attributed to former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, who was reviewing a porn case in the 70's; he supposedly said, "I can't define pornography, but I know it when I see it." However, I believe one person's porn is anothers GIMP!

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 11:05:47 AM

Name: Bill K.

I think this Stormrider Roman type art picture is terrific quality but it looks weird (out of place) to me because the Romans were into much more horrifying slow agonizing torture death then just cutting off a head. "How boring" I'm sure they would say. Now this wierdo picture: is something more to their liking. HALLELUJAH

Bill K.

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 03:03:05 PM

Name: Bman
E-mail address:

Weirdo...... Hey I resemble that remark. Just the very existance of this forum removes the whole weirdo stigma thing. How many days left to Halloween??? Can't wait this year is gonna be special.

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 03:27:32 PM

Name: YikYakker

TV Alert: My local listings indicate that FMC is showing Strange Days at 8:00 pm tonight. The scene with Brigitte Bako is a favorite around here, and the movie was reviewed by our very own GIMP Goddess, Jane von Detlefson.


Flintstone: Thanks for clearing up the Justice Potter Stewart thing. You know, it's funny how the mind deals with memories...they just kinda get smooshed together.

Somebody made that statement about art, but for all I know, it could've been my fifth-grade teacher.

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 06:08:14 PM

Name: John Galt
Homepage URL:

Here's something GIMPers should find interesting. It is a new indie flick called The Bunny Game.  Here's what Ain't It Cool News had to say about it:

THE BUNNY GAME has been hailed as an experimental film that is as disturbing as it is artistic. It follows a prostitute who is mercilessly tortured by a trucker when she hitches a ride. Many have praised the lead performance of Rodleen Getsic and the talents of writer-director Adam Rehmeier, yet at present it is still a little seen movie that is yet to find distribution in the US. Trinity Films picked it up in the UK under their Trinity X label, but now find themselves with a movie that they can't put out. Only time will tell if the company decides to re-cut and resubmit to the BBFC.

There's a trailer link there as well, which I put in the Homepage URL above. Looks like it has something for everyone, but the shaved head puts me off a bit. Has anyone heard of this one?

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 08:38:16 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

John Galt wrote:

Looks like it has something for everyone, but the shaved head puts me off a bit.

Gee, you think so? That was absolutely disgusting. Not the bondage, nudity, ballgag and torture, that stuff is cool. But why shave the chick's head? That's about the most revolting creative choice by a director I can think of. Let's take a fairly nice-looking lady and then make her look like a Buddhist monk with tits. Not only does that make her sex appeal a big fat zero, it also makes it meaningless to dish out any kind of abuse to her later. I mean, what's the point when you just removed the most feminine of attributes a woman can have? You might as well be tying up a department store mannequin. Minus the wig, of course.

Guys, think about your audience next time. The ones who pay to see this kind of stuff? We want pretty victims. We don't want to see Uncle Fester!

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 09:11:03 PM

Name: A Canadian

Ralphus wrote:

We want pretty victims. We don't want to see Uncle Fester!

Certainly not.

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 09:42:40 PM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

We want pretty victims. We don't want to see Uncle Fester!

Uncle Fester would make a cool villain though!

A naked woman being executed in front of a throng of jeering/cheering people? That's brilliant.

Not for me. Naked woman fine (and she looks good in the render), cheering people fine. But executed, or about to be implied, doesn't ring my bell at all, quite the opposite. Different strokes etc. I'd rather have Powershotz Steve show up in the render and stick an anal probe up her ass!

Wednesday, October 12th 2011 - 10:37:39 PM

Name: Scribbler

Thursday night TV...

Charlie's Angels: ep. Angels in Chains

The girls head to Cuba to fight a kidnapping ring, but they are framed as soon as they arrive and are promptly thrown into a women's prison.

Written by Rick Masters :)

One can dream!

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 01:53:34 AM

Name: Fritz

Scribbler wrote:

Uncle Fester would make a cool villain though!

Physically, I'm inclined to agree. He'd have to lose that goofy disposition, though. For anyone jonesing to see Fester as a slobbering, half-wit, torture-mad psycho, watch for "Scissorhands Pete" in K3: Prison of Hell. Here's Fester... I mean Pete, in the middle of one of his, um... assignments. Striking resemblance, no? And to help you get that image out of your head, here's a picture of one of his cleanly shaven victims. Sadly, she looks considerably worse about 20 brutal minutes later,

I must review this film some day.

* * * * *

YikYakker wrote:

A judge once famously said, "I don't know what art is, but I know what I like." This I like.

Alternatively, Mr. Burns once famously said: "You know, I'm no art critic, but I know what I hate. And I don't hate this."

* * * * *

After enjoying the teaser for Maleficarum (thanks Jane!), I made the mistake of catching a Youtube wave and surfing through those suggested links that call out like sirens from the right margin. It only took four hops before I came across a bunch of these anomalies. Normally, this is not my thing at all. First, it's clearly consensual. Second, it triggers my squick reflex. Third, I'm not even sure it counts as GIMP as the "victims" seem to be getting off on their peril. Then again, I couldn't help but wonder how much fun it would be to play with some of these women.

* * * * *

Eda wrote:

I switched again, and am now more happily a registered Libertarian.

At the risk of going a little off topic, I couldn't let this rest. As much as I am a libertarian at heart, libertarianism apparently is not an alternative to the so-called left-right split offered by the Democratic and Republican parties. According to some, Libertarianism and authoritarianism are on an orthogonal scale which runs perpendicular to the D-R axis, allowing for an even more confusing way to categorize ourselves. No longer is it enough to say which team you are on, you have to find where you are on... the matrix (whoa).

You can plot yourself by visiting this site and taking the test. I'm curious if GIMPers gravitate to any particular quadrant(s). On the test, there are no specific GIMP questions, unfortunately, but if we could add them, what would we ask? (There... back on topic.)

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 02:57:12 AM

Name: esso
E-mail address:

The Horse: My preference is for AOH and for the same reason as petelobo. Let her pull herself up. All the better. How long can she hold herself up like that before she settles back on the torturing edge? Then we proceed with the slow dance that makes a crucifixion so entrancing.

On the other hand I present the following short excerpt from a long story Kirsten and I wrote years ago for a now defunct interogation site. This part was written by Kirsten and there was none better.

jhlipton please note the drop scenario. And the improvement on weights that Kirsten has come up with.

"Oh, god..." I am in your torture chamber.

Manuel points. "El caballo, senorita!"

Central to the room is an object I don't recognise. It looks like a large doll's-house without walls. A rectangular framework, on which is a sharply-pitched roof, its peak reinforced with metal. It is stained with rust. No, not rust...

"No!" I give a shriek of horror as it all sinks in. But I can't escape; I can barely even struggle as I am dragged further into the room. My mind is a blur. I barely notice the long chain dangling from a pulley high in the ceiling, a simple catch-hook at its end. My bound wrists, still behind my back, are secured to the hook. "Oh, God, not again," I whimper.

Together, the two men haul the chain. It clatters through the pulley, and my arms are wrenched up behind my back. I give a shriek as my muscles are wrenched in a cruel and wholly new way; agony explodes into my shoulders, and it feels as if my arms are about to tear from their sockets.

Again they haul, so that I am on tip-toes, my arms hurting badly. Another few seconds, and they heave again. My body is hauled into the air. I give a scream of pain. Somehow, my shoulders are not dislocated, but it is incredibly painful. I can barely breathe, my body almost hanging straight down with my arms twisted up behind me. I can feel my shoulder blades grating together.

But they are not done. Two more pulls, until my dangling toes are easily four feet off the floor. Manuel secures the chain's free end to a floor-hook.

"Let me down, please, let me down!" I wail.

Manuel laughs as he passed underneath me. "You ride the Horse, now." His hand briefly closes on my foot, and gives it a tug. I am set twisting, and I cry out with the pain that explodes through my shoulders. I am aware of them dragging the 'horse' underneath me. I look down in misery; its smooth ridge is now directly below.

"Please," I beg. "Please, get your boss, tell him I'll talk, please! Oh, God, please!"

Manuel just grins, and, with brutal nonchalance, grasps the chain that runs to the floor, then kicks its end free of its anchoring hook.

"Noooo-o-o!" I give a scream of terror as I plunge downwards. My feet hit the sharply-angled flanks of the horse, but they have no chance of stopping my fall. My bare soles slide off, and an instant later I land with a terrible crunch! - right on the base of my pubic mound.

For the first time in my life, I truly scream.

I have never felt pain as massive as this. It feels as if I have been split all the way to my ribcage; agony explodes up through my abdomen, focused with unbearable immensity right between my legs.

I scream again, with all of my voice. A long howl of agony. The chain has been secured, so that my arms are wrenched up behind me, how high I can't tell; but the strain in my shoulders is terrible, forcing me forwards. The restraint prevents me from shifting off the horse's cruel edge, but takes none of the weight off my agonised sex. I feel sure my clitoris has been crushed; waves of unbearable pain seem to rend my pelvic bone in two.

Slowly, over the course of five minutes or longer, the initial shock of agony subsides. But the pain is still crippling, an awful, splitting intensity between my legs. I cannot stay silent, but groan and wail. My body is running with sweat, the tears pour down my face.

By the time I am lucid enough to become aware of my surroundings again, I realise that Manuel has put heavy iron shackles around my ankles. Their chains run beneath the horse, where they are redirected to a simple winch. It is operated by a long handle at the front of the awful construction, which Manuel now cranks over, before my streaming eyes. At once, I feel the shackles on my ankles bite down into each foot; a second turn, and my legs are drawn taut.

"Please, stop!" I wail. I realise what will happen; any further turns of the winch will force me even harder down onto the metal edge. After a moment's hesitation, Manuel takes his hand from the lever. He spits on the floor, then, with a last glance at me, he leaves me to suffer astride the cruel horse.

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 09:15:29 AM

Name: Sloth

esso - I agree, Kirsten did herself proud with that bit of writing - thanks for sharing.

Fritz - if you're keeping score, I took that little test that took about five minutes - I ended up almost exactly in the middle of the purple lower right quadrant - not quite sure where that puts me on the sick twisted pervert scale however.

John Galt - thanks for the heads up on "The Bunny Game" - it does look like it has a little something for every taste - and yes, the monk look is a bit disconcerting but if available I will give it a view.

StormRider - another fine work today - in this one I believe I'm seeing the sweat running down her chest - life is good.

YikYakker - your NBA hiatus idea is inspired - some years back before the days of cable and satellite when the number of shows was limited I recall reading a sci-fi story - the premise was at the end of each ratings period the bottom ranked show would do one final live performance during which the entire cast and crew would be executed - as luck would have it the losing show was "Battling Amazons" or something to that effect - all were bound and beheaded for our viewing pleasure - that's entertainment - is this day and age I would like to see that done to every liberal and conservative bitch on Fox News - of course being me, I'd have them hanged.

Stay well all

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 10:01:46 AM

Name: ninoben
E-mail address:

Great site! I am a fan of HOM movies, and the Blakemore interview is tops. I wait anxiously for the promised electro torture section. Keep up the good work!!!

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 10:59:04 AM

Name: flavius

Has the marvellous Stormrider a webpage where I could adore his work?

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 11:09:32 AM

Name: Bill K.

Terrific torture chair poser art Stormrider. Are you going to have or have you a web site to view your new/old terrific poser art?

Bill K

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 02:24:22 PM

Name: John Galt

Fritz: Curiosity got the better of me and I took the Political Compass test as well. I ended up just left and below center of the green Libertarian/Left square. (X axis= -7.12 and Y axis= -6.56)  Just me and Gandhi, and apparently he is even more authoritarian than I.

As to your question about GIMP-specific questions: There were two questions--whether you feel pornography should be legal for adults and whether you think that consenting adults should be free to do whatever they wish in the privacy of their own bedrooms-- that probably apply to GIMPers. I suspect the GIMP standpoint would be to strongly agree with both of those. In fact, I would be extremely interested in a GIMPer explaining to me why he or she did not strongly agree with both of those statements. That is not a challenge; it is a request for discussion.

I believe that GIMPers would be all over the map on this matrix. There are different reasons that GIMP appeals to different folks, but I don't think political leaning has anything to do with it. While I would like to suggest that facists might be more likely to subjugate and abuse women, and take inordinate pleasure in doing it, I suspect that anarchists would as well. And besides, speaking for myself and I think a lot of GIMPers, what I enjoy watching in entertainment is not what I would condone in Real Life.

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 05:23:20 PM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt:

Curiosity got the better of me and I took the Political Compass test as well. I ended up just left and below center of the green Libertarian/Left square. (X axis= -7.12 and Y axis= -6.56) Just me and Gandhi, and apparently he is even more authoritarian than I.

That doesn't surprise me. I took this test years ago and I finished just slightly to the left of Milton Friedman.

Not that this information is much help. Europe and Canada are addicted to big government and the U.S., in my view, is clearly headed in that direction.

I've said this before (and it has been controversial) but I'm not convinced that American GIMPers who favor more government in their lives fully understand what's at stake. You're very fortunate to have the First Amendment and you should fight to protect it, and that doesn't just mean criticizing Bible-thumping Republicans. There are plenty of pro-censorship types in all political parties.

I could be wrong -- after all, there's more to life than the freedom to watch porn -- but I suspect you Americans don't really want to reach the point where the government is confiscating your order of ZFX movies from CD Universe because the films offend someone's definition of "community standards."

There are underground methods for getting around the "obscenity" laws (particularly in the age of the Internet) but the most effective methods won't necessarily please the producers of GIMP content.

That means you have to support free speech for all consenting adults, including the things said by so-called hate-mongerers, "Islamophobes," etc. Freedom of speech is an all or nothing proposition. There ain't no compromise that's going to work out favorably for GIMPers, because a state that has the right to oversee what movies you watch will eventually have GIMP films in its crosshairs.

End of rant.

Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 06:19:02 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:

The Political Compass Test: I finished in the lower left green quadrant, right alongside Ghandhi but to the right of Nelson Mandella. Scores were Economic Left/Right: -4.75 and Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.18. For whatever that's worth. According to this, I lean to the left, but I've always considered myself a Centrist.

Anyway, this test is interesting but it's only partially on-topic, that being the final section that John pointed out where they ask you the sex questions pertaining to pornography. So use caution when following up because I don't want to see this develop into a full-blown political discussion. Most people don't come here to read about that stuff. I know I don't.

But getting back to that aspect of the test, is there anyone here who doesn't strongly agree with these 2 statements?

  • Pornography, depicting consenting adults, should be legal for the adult population.

  • What goes on in a private bedroom between consenting adults is no business of the state.

    If you don't, please let us know why you think that way. I do recall that years ago on this forum we had a guy saying he liked the idea that some porn should be made illegal and that we should be glad that we had it "while it lasted", or words to that effect. He also made it clear that he was voting for Bush in the 2004 election, if that tells you anything.


    Fritz's YouTube links: 3 words for you. FREAKGIRLS ON PARADE. Nuff said.


    Esso: Nice excerpt from Kirsten Smart. She's my favorite Internet writer, just a fantastic talent. Several months ago she gave me permission to repost as many of her stories as I wanted in the GIMP FICTION section. So why aren't they there now? It takes a while to convert the HTML to our story pages, it's long and tedious work and I have way too many projects in front of me right now, so it's on the back burner. Plus I don't think a lot of people read the stories here. But I hope to eventually showcase her on this site, since her stuff is definitely GIMP-worthy.

  • Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 07:36:34 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    So I took the test as well, and came out green also. I didn't bother checking the co-ordinates; let's just say I'm smack in the middle of the green square.

    I was not very satisfied with the wording of the questions, but this instrument has probably been tested for reliability, so I guess it works OK.

    The now-defunct U.S. News and World Report did a similar, but more sophisticated analysis of political views about 20 years ago. They identified several groups, or clusters, of constituencies - not just quadrants - based on the way people responded to statements about the issues of the day. But I won't go there.

    Ralphus wrote: is there anyone here who doesn't strongly agree with these 2 statements?

    Not me. But let's take them one at a time:

  • Pornography, depicting consenting adults, should be legal for the adult population.

    Yes, I would strongly agree with that. In fact, if they had a response choice called "completely agree", then I would have checked that one.

  • What goes on in a private bedroom between consenting adults is no business of the state.

    I would strongly agree, but not completely agree. The exception would be if someone knowingly transmits an STD to a sex partner. There ought to be some punishment for that. The state has a legitimate public health interest there.


    We could probably come up with a GIMPer test based on the same concept, if we could identify relevant quadrants, or, as I would prefer, clusters.

    For example, one dimension might be rape vs. torture. I don't think that's an either/or proposition; it's likely that there are folks here who prefer one more than the other, or who prefer one completely over another, or don't have any particular preference. So the wording of the questions and answers would have to allow for that.

    Another dimension might be consensual vs. non-consensual. Now, almost by definition, a lot of folks here prefer non-consensual. But based on posts that I've read here over the years, there are some who dig bondage of both types. So again, the questions and responses would have to reflect that.

    A quadrant wouldn't work well here because rape = non-consensual.

    Gosh, maybe I think about things like this too much.

    Maybe folks out there have some other ideas about a "GIMP test".

  • Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 09:57:24 PM

    Name: mothbrad

    Kirsten Smart was definitely one of the best internet writers out there, and like almost all of my favourites, she seems to have stopped writing (although she hasn't actually disappeared). I look forward to seeing her writing here (and wonder if there's anything that you have that I haven't seen).

    I'd rather not see any political discussion here that doesn't have to do with free speech related to our friends who are producers. Aside from which, I think that most of those political spectrum tests are crap - they work on populations, but not on individuals.

    Back to the Gimp ...

    Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 10:01:18 PM

    Name: Rick
    Homepage URL:

    Greetings All,

    Just wanted to pop in to give kudos to Stormrider. Very nice work. Even though this particular subject matter is not that much to my liking, I can appreciate the skill it takes and is still very interesting to look at. Working with Poser is a bit like herding cats. Have you done any of these scenes animated?

    A Canadian wrote: Same here. It's not my thing. For that matter, I don't have any interest in burning-at-the-stake scenes, either. What kind of weirdo gets off on stuff like that?

    I'm not really a BATS fan either. Burnt corpses are pretty nasty. That aspect of it is just not erotic to me. Certainly the bondage/torture elements are there, as well as some heavy duty struggling and screaming. While I don't dislike them, they hold no special place for me and if anything, are less desirable than other methods of torture or death. 

    What I wonder is, do BATS fans relish the death and the corpse or is it good up until then and then its over? What is it about fire that is intriguing or adds a sexual dimension that maybe others don't see? Death by strangulation is more my speed, and somehow, it makes more sense to me. I like the prolonged struggling, gasping and the lack of the smoldering wreckage. Not big on stabbing or bloodletting either, at least not sexually. 

    One thing about the BATS phenomenon is it actually makes me think I'm saner then at least a few people;) Of course I kid, we all have our interests. The psychology of this fetish I think is very interesting and a bit puzzling. 

    Poll: I would probably go hands behind the back. More helpless and it does force a back arch and the accompanying chest thrust out. Of course AOH is nice too=). As long as it looked inescapable and uncomfortable I'm probably good with either.

    John Galt wrote: I have no opinion on arms vis-a-vis horse positions because the torment doesn't really do that much for me.

    Truthfully, I am not that enamored with horses either, though Jane on one might actually make me a believer. Probably a must have for any period piece involving medieval torture.

    I think a horse scene would be more a lot more interesting if a spike or dildo of some sort was attached to the apex of the horse to go in the subjects pussy. It would have to be long enough to keep her from lifting off it, short enough to allow her to slide all the way down so she would still be cut by the top edge. Maybe a spike or protuberance to rub the clit as well. Then if she tried to lift herself she would have hump the spike. Of course it would require a AOH position. Toss in a butt plug (molten lead?) of some sort to keep the witch from taking a dump on the horse, lol=). And a gag to keep her from casting spells. Probably not very authentic, but I think it would make it a lot more interesting. I don't think I've ever seen a horse scene done with a dildo incorporated, but I have no doubt it's been done.

    That's it for now...


    Thursday, October 13th 2011 - 11:05:44 PM

    Name: Fritz

    Apologies to mothbrad, but political subjects, when they concern free speech, access to pornography, and the potential restriction of the very material we discuss here, is indeed relevant and on topic.

    * * * * *

    A Canadian wrote:

    Freedom of speech is an all or nothing proposition.

    That's really the crux of the matter. This isn't about big government vs. anarchy, nor is it about the rights of the individual vs. the "common good". People will debate these issues till the end of time, and none will ever be resolved. But who would argue against "freedom of speech"? That seems like a no-brainer. What could possibly be wrong with letting folks write and say whatever they like?

    The reality is this: everything wonderful and everything abhorrent in our society today came about because people wrote and said whatever they liked.

    Long ago I saw some Republican pundit (sorry, can't remember who) interviewed about this very topic. His words, which I remember to this day, were as follows:

    "Freedom of speech is the most fundamental of American freedoms. But... there are limits."

    Limits? If freedom is all or nothing, why do we need limits?

    Here's why: Try shouting "fire" (for no reason) in a crowded theatre. Publish a hate-filled diatribe and convince a sizeable chunk of the population to attack a group of people you don't care for. Conspire with psychopaths to plan an assassination. Use your celebrity to attack the down-trodden from the pulpit of your radio show or blog. Technically, this should all be legal if we had 100% freedom of speech. But are the potential consequences worth it?

    * * * * *

    Ralphus wrote:

    But getting back to that aspect of the test, is there anyone here who doesn't strongly agree with these 2 statements?

    I would guess most folks here would agree strongly with both statements. However, as YikYakker has pointed out, not everything that happens in the bedroom, even between consenting adults, gets a free pass. If one of the adults is mislead, drugged, mentally unstable, etc., they may well be consenting to more than they bargained for. Damn, another absolute crumbles to dust.

    As for the legality of pornography, we're back to the "all or nothing" problem. If all pornography is legal, it would mean legalizing child porn. Even some of the weirdos in this crowd might find that problematic. Otherwise, someone needs to draw a line. And once you draw a line, there will always be some righteous individual who gets offended by whatever fetish and begins pushing the line back to the 16th century. Think about it. Are slobbering GIMPers who enjoy watching naked women burnt alive all that different from bug-eyed anarchists who eat babies for breakfast? And don't give me that fantasy vs. reality crap - Joe the Plumber can't tell the difference.

    Freedom of speech? In your dreams.

    * * * * *

    John Galt wrote:

    I ended up just left and below center of the green Libertarian/Left square.

    Given your screen name, I suppose it makes sense for you to be in one of the libertarian quadrants. What surprises me is how many GIMPers are in the lower left. I was expecting most would be in the lower right, with a minority in the green square. Did anyone who took the test wind up in the upper quadrants? I suspect they may be the folks who disagreed with the porn and bedroom questions.

    As for me, I am one unit above the bottom of the chart and two units from the extreme left (-7.75 and -9.03). I expected to be green, but not that green. I suppose that makes me an anarchic Democrat. In the past, I always knew I was a moron, but now it appears I'm an oxymoron.

    * * * * *

    By the way, add me to the list of people who are lovin' the Stormrider pictures. No blood, but very sexy all the same.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 12:09:59 AM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    Rick wrote:

    I'm not really a BATS fan either. Burnt corpses are pretty nasty. That aspect of it is just not erotic to me...What I wonder is, do BATS fans relish the death and the corpse or is it good up until then and then its over? What is it about fire that is intriguing or adds a sexual dimension that maybe others don't see?

    Well, obviously, most people around here know that burning at the stake is my favorite fetish. And guess what? I think burnt corpses are pretty nasty, too. The aftermath of a woman being reduced to a ghastly charred image isn't appealing to me, either. Based on discussions over at StakeDamsels, a lot of us BATS freaks don't like that particular aspect of the fetish. But let me tell you what I do like.

    I like the suspense, the anticipation. I like seeing the fear in the girl's eyes as she's sentenced, and tearfully forced to walk up the platform and to face what will certainly be a horrible fate. Then comes my favorite part, when she is tightly lashed to the stake in such a way that she knows escape will be impossible. And it gets better when it's followed by the lighting of the pyre and the smoke beginning to rise up around her. She's scared and desperate and squirms helplessly in her bonds, but the heat and the flames inch closer to her with each passing moment. Then she feels the first bite of the flames on her legs. She gives an agonized scream.

    You don't have to take it the next step, where the woman is ultimately consumed. For me, it stops being fun once the girl stops being pretty and has her looks destroyed. Although for some, that's the "orgasm moment" of the BATS scene. I have no problem with that, and I totally understand it. But others of us just love the foreplay.

    I think it is the fire (and the smoke, especially) that takes it up an extra notch for me. I think fire is exciting. It's also scary. And seeing a woman being tied up combined with fire is an unbeatable combination. Why do people like damsels in distress? Why do people like bondage and torture? It's the same principle, really. BATS is just taking it an extra step. I've said it before, it's the Ultimate Bondage Punishment.

    I know I'm not the only one here who likes this fetish, although I'm likely in the minority, even on this board full of perverts and sick fucks. But if anybody else has the BATS fetish and wants to explain the appeal to Rick, this is your time to step up and share your opinion. Fortunately I had one more Stormrider BATS pic left to help you with the inspiration. Let's hear what you have to say.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 12:30:37 AM

    Name: mothbrad

    Fritz, no problem - that was the exact exception I made in my post. What I mean is that I'm not all that interested in what people here think of economic policy or the environment (even though they are both things I care passionately about in regular life).

    Regarding BATS - two things come to mind. First, that I like burning by a device (eg irons) but don't like open flames attacking flesh. There's no logical reason for this, but that brings me to my second idea - how specific our fetishes can be. I think we can isolate the instant in a movie or story where we lose that erotic charge, even if it's been going perfectly for us - maybe the camera zooms in on a tiny tattoo, or the girl isn't quite the right race.

    A funny thing I heard is the idea that back in the day, when it was so hard to get hold of porn, anything we could get our hands on was fine - now, with the internet, if a movie doesn't hit our fetish 100% in the first ten seconds, we're gone. When I look back over bondage magazines I bought before the WWW was a reality, I can barely get interested, although at the time they were lifechanging. Just a funny thought.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 01:18:55 AM

    Name: Bill K.

    Terrific bats poser art, Stormrider and Ralphus you save the best for last. What is this sudden attack on bats lovers all about? I don't get it. Why? To me it about the peril not the death. Once the bats victim, hot nude sexy women to me, expires it's over which is way before she becomes toast and I believe 100% bats lovers feel same way for if you visit StakeDamsels forum in see and read what is there you know this. We DON'T like, get off on, burned up corpses. After the girls in whatever type merciless peril dies if by hanging, head cut off, strangling, stabbing, bats, cooking or whatever it's over. This is make believe peril not death forum, right. Also I finish by saying there are people that have feet fetish??? What's up with that?

    Bill K.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 01:52:04 AM

    Name: Scribbler

    I don't see any attacks on BATS. Pretty sure it's just discussion, and the questions curiosity.

    And not being into it either, I was mildly curious too.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 02:59:03 AM

    Name: shankster

    I don't feel like we're being attacked, if the guys are curious, they should check out the stakedamsels forum for a bit of insight.

    I, like most bats fans, enjoy the peril imagery.

    Bondage, nudity, terror, its all there.

    Now add fire and heat to the mix, and it gets very erotic! (For those of us into that sort of thing)

    A naked chick, bound to a stake, twisting and wiggling in her bonds, shrieking, screaming.

    Desperately trying to free herself as flames surround and slowly close in on her, to me is very sexy.

    Right up to the moment the flames begin to lick her feet, (I also have a bit of a foot fetish by the way)

    After that, and the actual burning starts, it would get really ugly and no longer appealing.

    We're not really into burning women to death, its just the fantasy peril imagery that goes with this type of scenario that does it.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 05:19:58 AM

    Name: Stakedamsels
    Homepage URL:

    I'm a long time lurker of GIMP and a friend of Ralphus. I know of his long term passion for BATS, and exactly how he likes a scene to be....and to be honest, I believe us BATS fans are all in more or less the same camp. Burnt corpses and flesh....not for me..and not for 99% of BATS fans either.

    Perhaps that's the problem, and perhaps why people struggle to understand the fetish because it leaves an ugly and horrid scene as its parting shot - a gruesome burnt corpse.

    But take a step back for a moment, and consider the fantasy of seeing an innocent young woman marched to the stake, her first glimpse of the pole and wood pyre. Her instinctive realization and reaction to try and escape this horrible fate, her screams and panic. Now have her being tied to the stake, on top of the pyre base - elevating her to the gaze of all around. The chains crossing her heaving breasts as she still struggles and screams for help. The crowd watching, willing the scene along - eager for their pound of flesh. Once secured, she is helpless but still hopes for mercy to be shown. But as no mercy will be shown, and the first torch is plunged into the pyre, she now focuses all her energy on trying to escape....a futile but understandable reaction to her position. The crowd chant "burn the witch", over and over - even though they know she is innocent, they still are keen to watch. The flames begin to grow closer, slowly but surely, wrapping all the way around the outside of the pyre, warming her body - preparing her for what is to come...and then the first heat from the flames makes contact, and we watch her scream as never before.

    Its at this point, the BATS fantasy for me is entirely finished. The flames have almost reached the point of no return, and there will be no escape.... or perhaps there will be a brave sole may still rescue this beautiful damsel. That's it for me...I decide in my mind if she makes it or not, but I don't want to see any entertainment is over. Rescue her if you will, for me, this is enough, and this is what it's all about.

    Hope this helps give an insight into this dark fetish, and maybe even shine a little light on it. If BATS wasn't thought of as an erotic position for a beautiful damsel to find herself in, then it seems TV and Hollywood still beg to differ.

    Just the thoughts of a regular guy with a passion for BATS.


    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 08:57:08 AM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    Bill K: I think you misinterpreted Rick's post. There's certainly no attack on BATS or the guys who have the fetish, only a well meaning query as to why we like it. I think it's a fascinating subject so I'm trying to get BATS fans to open up about why it turns us on. I think fetishes in general are worth exploring because if you have a particular one, it makes perfect sense to you while everyone else is mystified.

    I would love to understand about guys who have the foot fetish, for instance. Millions of guys have them so there must be something about feet that I'm totally missing. I have a good buddy who absolutely loves feet. I just shrug and smile and accept it, since hey, I have odd things that turn me on, too. I have a smoking fetish, even though I'm a non-smoker, hate smoking in general and would never even date a smoker. I just happen to think it looks sexy as hell when a woman smokes. We had a guy post here once who said he had a wristwatch fetish. Girls who wear wristwatches. I mean, what's up with that?

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 09:07:47 AM

    Name: YikYakker

    I don't think it's all that unusual (and certainly not unacceptable) for some folks to have a BATS fetish. Fire has always held a mixture of fascination and fear for us humans since day one. When you throw a naked, terrified, helpless woman into the situation, the "foreplay", as Ralphus and others have described it, has all the elements of other GIMP scenarios, and more, like the jeering crowd.

    I can also understand the position of those who do NOT like BATS scenes, especially because of the aftermath, which we rarely see. Everyone has different tastes.

    Personally, I prefer racking and whipping scenarios and don't pursue BATS scenes actively. But some I've encountered are enjoyable and well done, like the one in The Devonsville Terror. BATS scenes are sometimes tough to pull off convincingly, as we've discussed here in relation to Maleficarum. Perhaps that's one reason why there aren't more of them.

    I think it's good that Stakedamsels and Ralphus and artists like Stormrider have done their best to preserve this genre. I think BATS has a legitimate place in the managerie of perversions that one can visit on the web.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 11:21:08 AM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    Many points....

    1) Ah, the Libertarian quiz... "Forced" questions, Yes or No answers to complex subjects, this "quiz" is worth less than the Myers-Briggs. But the less I say about Libertarians, the happier we'll all be.


    2) I'm not a Christian, but I consider the words and deeds of Christ (from the Gospels and Acts) to be distinct from commentary on them (all the books of the Bible after Acts, as well as Augustine, et al). Looking at just those 5 books, women were treated as equals, much, much moreso than they were by society at large at the time. Mary Magdalene is often considered as an apostle, equal to all the others (and well ahead of Judas). Christ first reveals himself to a woman (a Samaritan, who were the "gay, illegal aliens" of their day). He rescues a woman from death by stoning, telling the men threatening her that they are no better than she is.

    By and large, it was the "Not-Pauls" (the authors of the epistles attributed to Paul, but almost certainly not written by him) who started the whole anti-woman thing in the Christian church. I consider them to be the Anti-Christs.


    3) On a more on-topic note, I have an idea where blind-folds are mandatory:

    Four women (or more, and relatives - mom-daughter or sisters - are best) are tied in an x-cross, each naked save for a blindfold. An equal number of men slide their hands up the women's thighs and thrust 2 fingers into each pussy. They finger-fuck the women until the pussies are dripping. Then the men move about randomly (one or two might even wind up where they started.

    The women are forced to suck the cum-slimed fingers and then have to guess whose pussy they're tasting (they could do this by pressing one of 4 buttons, so none knows who the others are picking). If a woman guesses right, her tits are fondled and kissed - if not, she is tortured: 5 lashes, a jolt from a stun-gun, a punch to the belly, etc.

    The game contunes until all women have been suffiently tormented.

    This just one of many fun nights at Jhlipton's House of Horrors.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 11:24:25 AM

    Name: Bill K.

    The attack commment thing is in response to saying we enjoy (are into) seeing burnt up corpses which is not true and maybe I should said some other way. The feet fetish is example of why anybody likes, sexually enjoys, one kind of peril and not other. There is no answer or reason there just is. Bill K.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 11:26:17 AM

    Name: sirstef
    E-mail address:

    Greatly enjoying the stories. Can't imagine how one person can be so creative. Any made into movies?

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 01:58:05 PM

    Name: A Canadian

    Bill K. wrote:

    What is this sudden attack on bats lovers all about?

    Perhaps this is directed at my "what kind of weirdo...?" question. In case it wasn't clear to some, I was ribbing our overworked moderator.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 05:29:13 PM

    Name: histo
    E-mail address:

    Greetings from the BATS section.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 06:01:53 PM

    Name: Van_hefty
    E-mail address:

    About BATS

    I respect anyone's tastes in fetishes as valid, in spite of whether they concur or contrast with my own. That said, the defense I make for the BATS fetish is that it must be seen for how independent it actually is from the reality it's based on. Actual burning at the stake, as it was carried out in medieval times (and modern times in some instances) is devoid of sex appeal. A person ravaged by torture is wrapped to a post and burned alive for the spectacle of a crowd: leaving behind a charred corpse. Yet, in the imagination the scenario refines itself into the fetish that it is. The victim is beautiful, often stripped naked. The crowd is unanimous in her demise, which when you empathize with the victim, there is an appeal to her negative fame. She is hated by her audience to the extreme that they want to 'erase' her, painfully with fire. In the fantasy, the victim is gradually consumed by the flames, but we don't perceive the charring and scarring, only the obscuring of the body by flame, until she is completely converted to ash.

    In this sense, her performance at the stake is eroticized: by removing the unappealing elements, the violence and the graphic destruction, we have a different scenario altogether. At any rate, this is how I experience the BATS scenario. Actual BATS is abhorrent to me: which I'm grateful for.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 10:05:40 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    My last 2 posts came off too serious about the Bats and corpse thing and it was not meant to be. Sorry for use the word "attack". I should have said sudden interest or nothing at all. I misread what was said about bats fans and burnt corpses and now know no offense was meant. Sorry about that.

    Bill K.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 10:25:00 PM

    Name: Naraku

    Speaking only for myself, burnt corpses - or any corpses for that matter - don't do a thing for me. It's all the stuff that leads up to it that's the turn on. Having seen some of your work, Mr Masters, I know that you enjoy the screaming, struggling, restraint & helplessness. Now, add to that the intensity of burning & the finality, the fact that there is only one possible escape & that may be long in coming (at least from the victims perspective), & maybe you can see some of the appeal. I'm not a fan of BATS alone, I enjoy crucifixion as well, for much the same reason: the helpless victim writhing in agony. Impalement & breaking on the wheel are other favorites.

    Although, thanks to the Internet, I've begun to develop an interest in hanging & strangulation, the act itself is over very quickly & I much prefer the drama that precedes it to the final act. The same is true of beheading; the sight of a neck threatened by the blade is more appealing than the blood & headless body. I know from the sites I frequent, that there are others who feel differently, but, as the dominatrix said: different strokes for different folks.

    Also, as a history freak (as opposed to just your garden variety freak) the fact that BATS - as well as crux, the wheel, etc - can have an historical context has a special appeal. The inquisition & witch hunts provide a source of drama that really stimultes my interest. For this reason, modern settings, consensual snuff & serial killer stories just don't do much for me.

    I hope this explains some of the appeal, Mr Masters. At least, this is what appeals to me. I know others have their own reasons for being attracted to this sort of thing, but, these are mine. And, may I add, that I also have enjoyed the ZFX products. I especially liked "666" & its sequel & the "South of the Border" series.

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 10:32:38 PM

    Name: John Galt

    I will admit that BATS scenes are not my favorite perversion, although I generally find the lead-up to them quite stimulating. I was very impressed with the staged BATS bit in Head of the Family (which I reviewed and added copious vidcaps to here). And I thought the nude AOH bondage and burning sequence in Don't Go in the House was also exciting--although technically not a BATS scene--and it continued on to show the burnt-to-a-crisp body. I've read some recent comments that the burnt body is not necessarily part of the BATS mystique. Did anyone who watched Don't Go in the House find the scene ruined by showing the denouement?

    * * * * *

    Don't know if anyone bothered to watch the "Angels in Chains" episode of Charlie's Angels this week, but it did not deliver. We got a few shots of Minka Kelly with her hands cuffed behind her back and cleaved gagged but that was about it. She was also roughed up while bound but that wasn't shown. I guess maybe Minka Kelly is going to be the "bondage girl" for this show. That's just as well since the other two don't do much for me. (Erica Durance guest-starred in the episode as well, but she was overdressed and unbound.) Anyway, here are a few vidcaps of Minka Kelly cuffed and gagged, for what it's worth.
    Minka Kelly cuffed and gagged
    Minka Kelly cuffed and gagged
    Minka Kelly cuffed and gagged

    Friday, October 14th 2011 - 11:41:10 PM

    Name: Eda
    E-mail address:

    Afraid that Minka Kelly is not going to be the "bondage" girl of Charlie's Angels. Nor is anyone else. The show was just cancelled after four episodes.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 01:29:07 AM

    Name: Scribbler
    Homepage URL:

    Yeah, I bothered to watch it (Charlie's Angels), and it was crap. Way to take a franchise about a trio of hot chick detectives, and make it no fun, no titillation, no clever or remotely interesting detective work, no clever or remotely interesting dialog, just pointless existence-ness from start to finish.

    Canceling this was the most merciful thing they could have done! I don't blame the actresses though, it's the writing that blew. Angelina Jolie, Stacy Keibler and Jessica Biel couldn't have saved this show, unless they demanded completely different writers.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 05:03:09 AM

    Name: RoxanneBlue

    I just want to post why BATS is such a strong fantasy, whether the victim is male or female, or whether I imagine myself as the victim or executioner:

    First of all, it has the same attraction as any ritualized killing, whether it be murder or sacrifice. That is important for me, as murder is not erotic. An audience and a standardized ritual of some sort are intensely erotic.

    Second, it must be public. Humiliation and death must be witnessed, whether the crowd is hostile or sympathetic to the victim. Like a scaffold, the BATS must have some sort of performance to it, and the victim should be raised on a high pyre for all to see. No dark alley murders for me.

    Third, yes the bondage involved. I love to see a body in tight bondage, and a man or woman at the stake should be bound tightly (don't want them to escape, do we?). The writhing at the stake is wonderful, and the utter helplessness of the victim is incredibly erotic.

    So far, we have a tightly bound body placed high on a pyre, with witnesses gathered around and a ritualized event about to take place. Now we get to the metaphorical part, in which the fire is symbolic of orgasm. Yes, I know that in real life, the victim is not having an erotic time up there. But a slow burn - warming the body, tingling the skin, and slowly bringing it all to a raging climax - is an intensely symbolic act of sexual tension.

    So it is this blending of a physical act and a metaphorical act that raises BATS to the #1 fetish position for me.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 09:52:40 AM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    Bill K. wrote:

    I misread what was said about bats fans and burnt corpses and now know no offense was meant. Sorry about that.

    Not to worry -- there was no harm done, and it has been an interesting discussion.

    I agree with Ralphus that I don't get the foot fetish thing, but the one that really puzzles me is the guys who are into scat.

    I wonder what a scat website looks like? (Imagine the daily picture, if there is one). Or what kind of discussions take place....

    Bondage Dave: The re-design of this website looks like shit.

    Moderator: Thanks, I strained to get it just right.

    I think the less I know about that fetish, the happier I'll be.


    I didn't watch the new Charlie's Angels but I would say Minka Kelly looks fine in those photos (which include the logo from a Canadian network, which is curious). Maybe I should have watched it.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 10:58:28 AM

    Name: Bman
    E-mail address:

    This question goes out to Rick and all you other movie producers. Is the startle response to being touched with hot objects against some censor rule? I've seen the new trailer for your newest movie and it depicts a heated rod touched to breasts. NO startle response from victim, No sudden recoil away from the peril, No begging not to do it again. This seems to be the case in whatever depictions I've seen over the years. Is it just a direction flaw or is it a legal limit that it would cross??

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 11:27:20 AM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    Another long post...

    van_hefty: Actual burning at the stake, as it was carried out in medieval times (and modern times in some instances) is devoid of sex appeal. A person ravaged by torture is wrapped to a post and burned alive for the spectacle of a crowd: leaving behind a charred corpse.

    Alexander Dumas (of the "Three Muskeeters", "Man in the Iron Mask", etc.) was a big history buff and wrote a huge book called "Celebrated Crimes". One of the "criminals" is Joan of Naples, who is more a victim of youth and poor politics than anything. After she is driven from power, several of her relatives were tortured and killed.

    The relevant part of all this that two of her nieces (who we'll say were over 18) were stripped to the waist, flogged with whips which had metal tips and flung onto a fire. I couldn't help thinking of you-all as I was reading this.

    It is a tremendously fun book, full of people both well-known (like the Borgias), semi-well-known (like Martin Guerre) and not known at all.


    Eda: Afraid that Minka Kelly is not going to be the "bondage" girl of Charlie's Angels. Nor is anyone else. The show was just cancelled after four episodes.

    Must have been those same Puritans that got "Playboy Club" cancelled. Or maybe both just got really bad ratings and the protests had nothing to do with the cancellation.


    RoxanneBlue: Second, it must be public. Humiliation and death must be witnessed, whether the crowd is hostile or sympathetic to the victim. ... No dark alley murders for me.

    Third, yes the bondage involved. I love to see a body in tight bondage.

    Sounds like you would love the House of Horrors. It's a thing I came up with on DarkFetishNet for the torture, rape and murder of young hotties. There is a live audience (some of whom are chosen to participate in the evening's festivities, as well as a live Internet audience (we also sell streaming and recorded videos). Lots of bondage and very public (we're very proud of our lighting -- soft but no shadows.


    Canadian: I didn't watch the new Charlie's Angels but I would say Minka Kelly looks fine in those photos.

    In the second or third episode, they actually let Kelly get beat for a while before she subdued her assailant. Between that and the hot reporter restrained to a chair and stoned out of her mind, it was not too bad for the kind of show it was.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 02:08:51 PM

    Name: John Galt

    A Canadian: Yes, I superinposed that CTV logo over the vidcaps just to mess with your mind....

    * * * * *

    For any voyeuristic GIMPers who enjoy seeing celebrities get the bondage-and-rough-sex-gangbang treatment, the latest Sex and Submission update features Joslyn James, the Tiger Woods mistress who enjoyed her 15 minutes of fame early in 2010 when she was outed and then she released text messages from Tiger in which he hinted at (and specified) "dark" sex acts. Choking and rough sex? Is "dark"? Give me a break, mainstream media morons.

    Warning: She has ugly tattoos and shaved the sides of her head in a very unflattering (if not downright off-putting) way.

    Too bad doesn't have a Tiger Woods look-alike in their stable of studs, or they could have taken the shoot to a whole 'nother level. Starting with a putter and working up to a 9 wood (which is a big one, right? because I don't play golf). But as it is, she plays an uppity and insulting boss who gets used and abused by two fed-up employees. So it is a role-play rape in the fashion.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 03:38:58 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Ralphus is that terrific jail house poser hot nude picture still Stormrider's art? And I suggest Stormrider should tag/signature his art for this is free open site and his terrific art will find it way to www so I would think he surely want viewer of it outside this forum to know who did it.

    Bill K.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 04:05:51 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    It's a good thing we don't move our clocks back to Standard Time until after Halloween. I wouldn't be able to stand having to wait an additional hour to see Maleficarum.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 04:09:52 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    We've gotten some great responses about the appeal of burning at the stake the past few days, I'm impressed. In a way, it's validating to know I'm not the only freak around here who likes this stuff. Like Stakedamsels mentioned, BATS imagery has been prevalent in TV and movies for a long time now, so much so that I've got hours and hours worth of scenes in my collection. And let's not forget artworks. I have literally thousands of images on my hard drive of beautiful women at the stake. Obviously, there are countless artists out there who also find the image desirable.


    sirstef wrote:

    Greatly enjoying the stories. Can't imagine how one person can be so creative. Any made into movies?

    When you say one person, are you referring to the stories of Eda Chang? There's also multiple stories in the More GIMP FICTION section by Master Wryter. Assuming you mean Eda's work, plans are underway to eventually film one of her stories as a movie by the people behind Red Feline. No official date yet, but it's upcoming. I'm sure we'll hear more about in the future.


    John Galt wrote:

    I've read some recent comments that the burnt body is not necessarily part of the BATS mystique. Did anyone who watched Don't Go in the House find the scene ruined by showing the denouement?

    Well, not me, I love that scene. It's probably one of the most realistic-looking burning scenes I've ever seen, although it was obviously done with a mannequin. At least, I think so...although the actress never made another movie again, did she? Hmmmm....

    You do make a good point, we see a silhouette of a crispy critter with wisps of smoke still coming off her body when they return to the scene after initial burning. I've always kept that part on my compilation disk, I'm not sure why. The blackened figure doesn't resemble the original actress, maybe that's why it never bothered me.


    Charlie's Angels canceled: Too bad, although I never watched the show. They were making a habit of tying up and abusing Minka Kelly (twice in 4 shows) so ending that doesn't make me very happy. Hopefully the rest of the series will be released on DVD so we can see what we missed.


    Bill K. asked:

    Ralphus is that terrific jail house poser hot nude picture still Stormrider's art?

    Of course, think I'm going to stop running Stormrider artworks as long as he's getting multiple comments every day? Eventually I'm going to run out, though, just warning you all now. But there's plenty of more good stuff to last for a while more.


    Bman: I know you directed your question to Rick, but I'm assuming you're referring to Amber Bliss's heated screwdriver torture scene in ZFX's Goon Squad 2. I'm not sure which trailer you saw, but I can tell you in the actual movie, Amber Bliss screams her ass off (through her ballgag, which sounds even better) while she's being burned in that scene. It's a really good scene; in fact, all of Amber's scenes are standouts in that movie.

    Hard to believe that 2 years have gone by since that came out. Latest I heard from the Rickmeister, he said his new animated movie should be out this year. At the time he said October or November, so I'm guessing February or March :) He has a history of missing deadlines, but the wait is usually worth it.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 06:03:33 PM

    Name: Reine Margot
    Homepage URL:

    Reine Margot posts again

    A you can all see in the Maleficarum countdown, the release of this most anticipated little movie is FAST approaching its moment under the sun. Or, better yet, the light of the projector... which for a movie is the equivalent of the sun that gives us our life. The days fly over our heads like the clouds in a windy day. Too FAST.

    And the counter here... up above, is tormenting us daily. Talk about pressure. (smiles)

    The 31st is in the horizon and it no longer looks that far as it did when we said that was the date. Now it's right there, like a border post between two countries. We'll be crossing that border as scheduled.

    We hope that Maleficarum's moment will be more than just a moment, we hope that it will have a long and healthy running life. It's an unusual film, of course. It follows our 12 year tradition started by JJ and Camille with Red Feline On the Cross where torture takes the center stage, but it goes further, it brings in a plot, which in all of the Red Feline productions is only a subtext.

    In the old days of RFPIX, when we had the Red Feline Club, those old days of HTML and few movies, very few, JJ had the time to write the subtexts of the movies into nice episodic stories illustrated with vidcaps from those few movies.

    Those of you who were members of the Red Feline Club remember the good old days, ... or days of yore, ... or the ancient times of the Red Feline World.

    JJ felt, back then, that movies like Red Feline on the Cross or Red Feline and the Inquisition had the potential of being more elaborate stories and that behind those minimalist movies there were complicated characters with rich lives and backgrounds.

    One film that came out of the desire to include more in our movies, or the thirst for more and more plot was Martyr, where JJ and Camille took the drama of the actress/model, Camille, and put it within a context of the struggle of a woman in a patriarchal setting, where her boyfriend takes the place of the oppressor and Camille finds her freedom when Tadeusz tortures her.

    We have an entire academic discussion on that matter which we'll make it public at one point. It touches many of the points made in discussions here, at this forum and which I touch, slightly, at the end of this long ... very long .. post.

    In the case of Maleficarum, the reasons of Francisca's (Mila) persecution are established and the excuse, her friendship with Mariana, (Jane) is the plot that drives the story.

    We don't need to guess the subtext anymore, as we have to do in the minimalists productions where the subtext is more for the benefit of the actress so she can believe in her suffering and convey that suffering to an audience that has no clue as to why the poor woman is going through such painful punishment.

    In Maleficarum, the suffering of the two women takes the center stage and that's the purpose and the amazing part of the movie and it's also its intrinsic problem.

    Why is it a problem?

    It's not an easy film to show to a theatrical audience and yet that's what we want to do.

    Is it a risk? Maybe.

    Our movies have a niche market, one that is growing steadily as new productions come out and more people find us. But they have to find us, they have to search with the proper words, they have to be looking for us in the wide world of the web and if they are looking for what we do is because they want to see what we're known for.

    Some, very few, might find us in a store in Amsterdam or New York or Paris, but most people find us in the web. 99.9 % of our fans find us in the web, that's a fact and the numbers are not in the thousands upon thousands. No.

    But going from that almost underground existence, where we're almost exotic, rare and not easy to find to a bigger presence, with press releases discussing the subject of torture and the Inquisition, TV interviews to the director and actors and so on.... will that be negative? Positive? Make no difference?

    When you see the film, almost two hours of suffering with no relief in sight, the question arises. Is this good for a theatre?

    We are pretty confident that this film is a major accomplishment and it will be received with enthusiasm and glee by those who follow our work and those who will find us in the future.

    It is a great movie for the fans of gore, gimp, female distress, funky, gimpy, kinky movies... no doubt about that. In fact, Jane is the Scream Queen for our times.

    But here we are, considering to take Maleficarum to the movies where people pay a ticket, sit with hundreds others and watch the movie while eating their popcorn and drink their coke.

    That's in our minds now. But us our minds wonder, we're working very, very hard to make this happen and to get other things done as well.

    Today, for instance, as I write this, is a quiet day. The music is playing in the background, JJ's playlist in iTunes, which includes Astor Piazzola, Cold Day, Jethro Tull, Coco Rosie and a host of other bands and musicians, a very eclectic mix of sounds. But it plays softly while JJ, Jane and Mila work on their computers, each watching someone suffer.

    Jane watches Camille's suffering as she edits The Via Crucis of Camille 4, a movie that needs some special sound work. In fact, by the time this goes up in the GIMP this movie is already out for downloads and DVD.

    Mila, in the meantime, has her attention focused on Gabrielle's suffering in Seven Days on the Cross. Another future release that a lot of people have been waiting for. We have four episodes out and the fifth has been there, waiting for its turn almost forever. As if Gabrielle can hold unto that cross for eternity.

    JJ watches both, Jane and Mila suffering the pain of torture in Maleficarum... all that suffering underscored by the voice of Dolores with the Cranberries or the accordion that cries out in a Piazzola's tango.

    He's going through his own suffering since he must have the final cut of the movie yesterday, or the day before, so, he goes on for hours and hours, someone misses him in the bed, but she must wait for he's in a mission while the clock tics and tocs.

    It's sunny outside.

    In a few minutes we'll sit at the table to have lunch and talk about the white bunny across the street, the mascot at the daycare center where nice ladies take care of a bunch of toddlers. Or we'll talk about the cat's shenanigans before lunch or about the high pitch screams of the neighbor's kid who has his own power to torment those around him, including us who have to hear his screech that breaks the sound barriers of our walls.

    A picture of perfect bliss.

    Like a well oiled machine where the effectiveness of its work resides in the sum of its working parts.

    We work as if every one of us was specifically made for this.

    Is it destiny?

    Our wonderful World of Red Feline is the result of a series of chance meetings. People who are from so far off parts of the world who in normal conditions would never, ever meet.

    Camille is French but she happened to be in Bolivia at a mass for a relative of hers the same day JJ was at the same mass. They looked at each other and smiled, they didn't know what the future had in store for them.

    Reine Margot was found in a disco, a boat on the Tisza river in a far off Hungarian town that JJ never ever heard it existed until the time when he happened to be there with a bunch of singers and dancers celebrating the opening of Jesus Christ Superstar at an open air theatre.

    Jane was passing through Bolivia on her way to Chile and she just happened to be with an Irish friend who saw a casting call notice for American actors at a restaurant's wall. She met the Irish guy in New York where she was visiting for a short while, she lived in France back then.

    And Mila just happened to fill in for a receptionist who was fired some days before, actually she wasn't fired, she disappeared with the cash deposit she was sent to make at the bank. Those seemingly unlikely and random encounters had life altering consequences for all of us.

    I ask again, destiny?

    It's not only that we all met, but that each fit in so well in what we do.

    It doesn't happen like this in normal life, does it?

    And I can't ignore the big BATS discussion here. We do have a BATS movie coming out, remember? Is the discussion going to generate more attention to the movie? I hope so. I also read a lot about rape fantasies. The picture above is from the scene in the movie where Mariana (Jane) is about to be raped. That scene is really tough. JJ mentioned that when he was editing it he had a really hard time, Jane's performance is so intense that one can't avoid wonder if it's actually the real thing.

    So, when she's finally dragged to the stake to be burn one is full of feelings for her in ways I can't describe.

    The screening with the Cinemateca execs was postponed to Wednesday, October 19th. JJ didn't want to show the film until is finished... and it will be all ready to go on Monday the 17th of October, so the movie theatre scheduled the private screening for Wed. at 9:30 AM. By noon we'll know if they are willing to show it.

    It's going to be the first time the movie is seen in the big movie screen. That should be a unique experience for those of us who are going to be present.

    We're intrigued about how the commission in charge of accepting the movie will react. They normally check the movies to see their overall technical quality, they pass most movies unless they totally suck ass. But this time is different. It's a good film in terms of its technical quality, great photography, good story, good editing, amazing acting and realistic portrayal of torture, perhaps too realistic for some.

    And that's the test. Will they be willing to show a movie like this? We can't wait to see their faces.

    I think my two euro cents in the discussion of the gimpy evils and/or charms of Catholicism can contribute to either darken or illuminate the issue. Warning, it will make this post extremely long since I'm a trained anthropologist with a long history of discussions on this matter with a true "exegeta", one that studies religion with a passion because he was trained by Jesuits.

    One issue deals with how women are treated by religion, but I must add by society in general. Religion, to me, is a reflection of society and society is influenced by religion. A give and take relationship. But why does this relationship exist? When did it start?

    Humans have begun organizing their societies according to what they knew of their world for survival and to meet some urgent needs.

    If someone found that drinking fresh milk from a cow and soon later having a not very well cooked piece of pork meat made people dead, then the ordnance of the high priests would be "do not eat milk and eat pig" and some would go as far as forbidding pigs altogether. Eating pork, thus, becomes a sin.

    The bible and other ancient books are full of references to all sorts of laws and regulations that come from experiences such as eating and drinking.

    Obviously, before the invention of penicillin and other life saving medications, there were diseases that were linked to sex.

    Uncontrolled sex was a source of disease like no other thus "the wages of sin are death". Prostitutes were cast out of villages because they carried within the evils of such sins. Simply put, sex caused many to go extremely ill and die.

    Since all other diseases, such a plagues were not carried by women, they had to be blamed for that too, so a strange and harmless village woman would be accused of bringing the plague into town and off to the stake with her.

    It is also well known that women have an easier time when getting laid. Go to any bar and there will be a lot of men hitting on one woman while very few women going after one man, if any. Men have the need to control this.

    It's easy to see how things evolved when humans started organizing into groups for survival. Before the concept of man-made laws, as we know them, there was the need to convince others of following some rules and the best way was to have them come from a higher form, a god.

    We associated the forces of nature with gods, that was not hard...

    It all comes down to control.

    But there's something interesting about Catholicism. Confession. In the Catholic tradition there's confession, where one confesses her/his sins and receives forgiveness with a penance. A few Hail Marys and it's done. Protestants did away with such a cathartic and, frankly, psychological way of dealing with guilt. So, after conversion or baptism one had to go and SIN NO MORE . That's a lot of pressure on the faithful. A lot of repression comes from the lack of weekly sessions of forgiveness.

    Another good point of Catholicism is intercession. One can go to a Saint or to the mother of God herself, The Virgin Mary, to intercede before God and she, as generous as she is, can actually convince an incensed God to forgive the poor soul who is nothing but weak in the flesh.

    All those beliefs act as safety valves for Catholics, something that Protestants don't have. It's the believer all alone and tiny in front of an overwhelmingly powerful master of all of the universe who had no qualms in sending his son to the cross.

    Now, as far as the creative ways of torturing people that the Catholic Church seemed to have, it's mostly the development of Torture through time, especially in large organized societies like The Roman Empire. When Rome became catholic, Catholicism inherited everything Rome ever invented.

    The Chinese didn't need to be catholic to be extremely creative.

    Well, I think I said plenty for one day or two... I shall return ... and this is not a threat. I must. After all, we're all eagerly waiting to see Maleficarum all complete and full of gimpy awesomeness.

    I will certainly have more to say soon... very soon...

    Reine Margot

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 08:48:28 PM

    Name: Distressed Damsel
    Homepage URL:

    I just wanted to pop out of lurker mode again, and comment on today's picture. For me, this one is better, as I can imagine myself in her position... naked, chained and helpless, awaiting my fate... hopeful some delicious ravaging at the hands of a dark but handsome warrior. *coughs*

    As far as BATS goes... not that keen on it... or any tortures that result in death. Death by fire is certainly unpleasant, and doesn't give me any thrill at all.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 08:55:58 PM

    Name: Rick
    Homepage URL:

    Greetings All,

    A few comments on your comments:

    Bill K wrote: What is this sudden attack on bats lovers all about? I don't get it. Why? To me it about the peril not the death.

    I'm sorry if it came off that way. I think it's interesting and was trying to gain understanding, not find fault with it. Also, I have no problem with death fetish or any fetish, unless someone is really being injured, killed, or underage people are involved. While I like the BATS scenario (and just about any DiD scenario), its just not THE scenario for me. Anyway, thanks for your comments.

    Ralphus wrote: Why do people like damsels in distress? Why do people like bondage and torture? It's the same principle, really. BATS is just taking it an extra step. I've said it before, it's the Ultimate Bondage Punishment.

    I can see how a BATS scene has some appealing elements. It is a death carried out in an acute fashion with a lot of buildup and drama. The aftermath is not part of the fantasy, more an end to the means. One thing for sure, there is probably nothing more painful than burning.

    For some reason, this scene does not resonate as strongly for me as say, a rack scene or a flogging. I guess to me it seems the BATS part is almost anti climactic, antiseptic portion of the torture ritual, even though it is, in fact, the climax. For me it symbolizes an end to the fun :P. It is very dramatic and there is a sexual element but it's subtle. Of course the fantasy could be far different than how these acts were actually carried out=). I find it interesting that while I think our tastes in torture (and tattoo free women) is frequently the same, here is an area that we are divergent. Thanks for giving your take on it.

    Narraku wrote: Also, as a history freak (as opposed to just your garden variety freak) the fact that BATS - as well as crux, the wheel, etc - can have an historical context has a special appeal..... I hope this explains some of the appeal, Mr Masters. At least, this is what appeals to me.

    I appreciate your comments and thanks for sharing your thoughts. I can see how the historical aspect adds to the authenticity and appeal of the BATS concept.

    To all BATS fans:

    Thanks for all the great responses. I believe I have gained greater understanding of the BATS scene and I'm sure you have educated a few others as well. While I may not fully share your passion, I can get my head around it far better. Thanks to all for sharing your thoughts so eloquently.

    A Canadian wrote: I suspect you Americans don't really want to reach the point where the government is confiscating your order of ZFX movies from CD Universe....


    Bman wrote: This question goes out to Rick and all you other movie producers. Is the startle response to being touched with hot objects against some censor rule? I've seen the new trailer for your newest movie and it depicts a heated rod touched to breasts. NO startle response from victim, No sudden recoil away from the peril, No begging not to do it again. This seems to be the case in whatever depictions I've seen over the years. Is it just a direction flaw or is it a legal limit that it would cross??

    No, there is no law against reacting to burns in a movie. I assume your referring to Goon Squad 2. Amber Bliss is in a very stringent position, AOH with legs spread wide, on tiptoes impaled on a dildo. Through most of the scene she is stretched extremely tight and gagged so her ability to move is pretty limited. I think its a pretty good scene, but of course anything can be improved. Incidentally, Amber does beg, cry and scream during this scene, but she's ball gagged and drooling a lot so it's fairly unintelligible. For those unfamiliar, you can check out the trailer here. Below a few captures from the scene.

    Getting those sharp reflex reactions is good from a "selling it" standpoint, but from a filmmaking standpoint it needs to be balanced with the ability to incorporate technical elements and get the shot, particularly on tight shots. A big reaction will probably go out of the frame or be more difficult to frame and the contact with the hot object will not be clearly visible. We are trying to get a mark on there as well. Those are things I consider. It's a bit of a balancing act.

    That's it for now...


    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 09:20:49 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Thank you for terrific post Reine Margot.

    Has there been any decision on the early release sale of the DVD before the Halloween premiere of Maleficarum so all of us can get it in the mail to view it on same time/day Halloween?

    Bill K

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 10:48:59 PM

    Name: Fritz

    Van_hefty wrote:

    Actual burning at the stake, as it was carried out in medieval times (and modern times in some instances) is devoid of sex appeal. A person ravaged by torture is wrapped to a post and burned alive for the spectacle of a crowd: leaving behind a charred corpse.

    Most of us agree that the violence we dream about in our fantasies would actually repel us were we to witness it for real. Yet for centuries, works of art and literature have depicted some incredibly graphic scenes of rape, torture and death. Today, technology allows us to represent the most horrific spectacles in ways which make the facsimile indistinguishable from reality. Why do we go to so much trouble to show what we claim to loathe?

    Obviously, some of us find it entertaining, and for whatever reasons, often sexually stimulating - so long as we know it isn't real. And though it's hard to imagine a (simulated) charred corpse as anyone's masturbatory delight, I'm sure, given the range of fetish interests, there is a tiny minority who believe a BATS video without a lingering pan over a crispy corpse is missing the money shot. If the bug-crush crowd is able to find sexual satisfaction by watching Jiminy Cricket squashed by stilettos, anything is possible. So I'm sure a BATS scene, faked but faithful to an actual burning, may have sex appeal for some.

    * * * * *

    YikYakker wrote:

    I don't think it's all that unusual (and certainly not unacceptable) for some folks to have a BATS fetish. Fire has always held a mixture of fascination and fear for us humans since day one. When you throw a naked, terrified, helpless woman into the situation, the "foreplay", as Ralphus and others have described it, has all the elements of other GIMP scenarios, and more, like the jeering crowd.

    I think this is why some of us find it hard to imagine a burnt corpse as being erotic. By the time the flames have died down, most GIMPers would agree the fun is gone. The victim is no longer a beautiful, naked woman, bound and terrorized, writhing in front of a roaring crowd. She looks like a giant burnt roast - unrecognizable and not very enticing (except to those mentioned above).

    That's probably why this topic has generated so much discussion. Unlike most other perils, the BATS fantasy imagined by aficionados is very different from the real thing. Though we often wish GIMP scenes were more realistic, most of us want BATS scenes to be stylized, trimmed and sanitized to make them easier to consume.

    * * * * *

    Bman wrote:

    Is the startle response to being touched with hot objects against some censor rule? I've seen the new trailer for your newest movie and it depicts a heated rod touched to breasts. NO startle response from victim, No sudden recoil away from the peril, No begging not to do it again. This seems to be the case in whatever depictions I've seen over the years.

    As I mentioned in an earlier post, PKF recently released Deadly Interrogation III, a custom video I wrote for John M. In it, there is a scene where the heroine has her breasts burned with a hot iron. It could be a matter of opinion, but in my view, she appears a bit startled:

    And to my knowledge, no censors have complained.

    * * * * *

    Ralphus wrote:

    It's probably one of the most realistic-looking burning scenes I've ever seen, although it was obviously done with a mannequin.

    A while back I read an interview with the director of Don't Go in the House, Joseph Ellison (who went on to make just one more film before becoming a musician). He explained that the burning scene was done by using mirrors to overlay a fire (burning off to the side) with the shot of the actress. The scene could not have been done with a mannequin as the woman struggles quite realistically once she is engulfed in flames.

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 10:51:33 PM

    Name: Covers
    Homepage URL:

    Carnyx: Well, it took six weeks, but I think I've found your comic book whipping scene. Do these pages look familiar?

    Carnyx wrote: hi everyone- here is the first one. it might be the best comic book whipping i have ever seen. i found it in late 1975. i think it was to cash in on the charlies angels craze. there was this elite group of scantily clad women crime fighters. one of them went undercover in some criminal organization. she was revealed to be a spy by this crooked black detective who was working for the group. they then cut to a scene where the spy is being whipped topless by a crazy topless woman who is getting her pleasure from this. she has an ugly birthmark on her face and she keeps telling the girl to beg for mercy which she refuses to do. she is finally rescued by a crime fighter with a russian accent. the crazy woman tells her she'll make her beg for meercy too, but the russian tells her she is a very sick woman. please let me see this scene again before i die! thank you everyone. robert

    Saturday, October 15th 2011 - 10:55:42 PM

    Name: Scribbler

    There's one image I could've gone my whole life without seeing.

    (not talking about daily pic.)

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 12:11:31 AM

    Name: John Galt

    Well, with all this talk of BATS I thought maybe it was a good time to add a review of Don't Go in the House to the GIMP Reviews page. It does not contain a BATS scene, but it does have a great burning scene. Plus, I was a little surprised to see that we did not have a review on file. Also, thanks to Fritz for the inside scoop on how they filmed the burning scene. I always wondered how they managed the writhing hands in the flames, which I thought was an exceptionally effective touch.

    * * * * *

    Don't Go in the House (1980)

    Easily one of my favorite disco era "Don't..." movies, Don't Go in the House distinguishes itself as having what I consider to be, arguably, the very best burning scene in a mainstream movie. (Head of the Family is also extremely good, but stops short of actually burning the victim.) The movie itself is a confused mess, borrowing liberally from Psycho but without any of Hitchcock's finesse. I will therefore dismiss the plot in one short sentence and spend all my time on the GIMP parts.

    There's this guy whose mother punished him by burning him when he was a little boy and now that he is grown, he tricks women into going into his house and burning them, and then dressing them up and setting them in a domestic tableau. Yawn.

    The first and best victim is pretty Kathy Jordan (played by Johanna Brushay, who doesn't seem to have made any other movies, according to IMDB). She works in a shop and by means of standard horror movie plot devices, ends up being given a ride home by our fire-obsessed psychopath, Donny Kohler. But of course he needs to stop by his house and check up on his mother and would she mind since it is on the way. I will say this for Kathy, she seems distrustful of Donny from the very start. But not distrustful enough. He whacks her on the head and about 27 minutes into the movie she wakes up naked and chained in a metal-covered room.
    Kathy wakes up naked and chained AOH
    She struggles and makes frightened noises as we cut away to Donny and then back again.
    Kathy struggles helplessly
    Kathy looks up at the door in terror as Donny strides in dressed in a fireproof suit. Her fearful eyes follow him as he walks around the room.
    Kathy watches Donny in terror
    He picks up a large gas can and douses Kathy's helpless naked body with, presumably, gasoline. Kathy cries and whimpers.
    Donny douses kathy with gasoline
    Donny picks up a flamethrower. Kathy screams and struggles. He aims it at her. She screams and struggles even more.
    Donny takes aim as Kathy watches in horror
    Donny sets Kathy on fire, and we watch for a good 20 seconds as the flames consume Kathy's body. In a really effective bit, the camera focuses on Kathy's burning hands twitching helplessly in the manacles.
    Kathy is burned alive
    The flames die down and we see a blackened, burned-to-a-crisp Kathy. You would think that would be a step too far, but it is strangely appropriate.
    Kathy's burned body
    And that's basically the GIMP climax of this movie.

    There is another gal who has car trouble and is obviously despairing when helpful Donny pulls up and offers her a ride, as long as they can stop by and check up on his mother on the way. Next thing we see is a burned body. No nudity, no struggling--nothing. What a disappointment.
    Car trouble
    Then Donny talks these two chicks into going home with him and once again we see nothing except a very brief scene as they are rescued. One is tied AOH and the other looks to be bound hands behind back sitting in the corner.
    Two victims who escape. *sigh*
    SUMMARY: Awesome burning scene of a very attractive, naked girl chained wrists and ankles in a metal-covered room. Two other missed opportunities.

    As a horror flick, this is definitely typical B-movie fare. As a GIMP movie, it does not deliver on two occasions, but redeems itself with an incredible nude bondage burning scene. I am not a burning at the stake fan, and this is technically not a burning at the stake scene, but I like the way it was done. The movie kind of sucks, but I give the burning scene a very strong A. As I said, I think it is one of the best ones I have ever seen.

    This movie is available on DVD from Amazon as a standalone flick, or as one of three grindhouse flicks in a collection for just a few bucks more.

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 12:17:08 AM

    Name: Bill K.

    There is a manip bats MP4 video produced by Matmos called Racing the Rain that sums up my idea of what a bats fantasy peril should be to me. No burning skin/body or burned up corpse but just a beautiful sexy fully nude women witch bound tightly to the stake struggling with whimpering cry (she is gagged) for help as the flames slowly climb up devour her naked body toe to head. When the flames reach her head the movie ends. I wish I could post it here to show you guys what I talking about but it in my PC bats files and I know of no site that I can post address it to here. Ralphus do you have it in your files and can post it or it address here?

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 12:28:13 AM

    Name: darkeros
    E-mail address:

    Thanks to Blue Dog to recommend

    Really great.

    I found free stuff from them:



    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 06:07:01 AM

    Name: A Canadian

    John Galt: Nice work on the review and caps of Don't Go in the House. I can see why that scene with Johanna Brushay would help the film get such a great grade. The actual burning itself doesn't appeal to me, but the moments leading up to it look, uh, hot.

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 10:20:22 AM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Margot: I don't know how you find the time to write such lengthy posts with your busy schedule, but we appreciate the effort you make to enlighten this forum.

    Regarding the teaser to the roasting scene...I'm a bit torn, but it's hard to make much of an impression with a 14-second snippet. The audio is of flames, but from what I understand, it's just hot coals underneath her, right? Coals wouldn't make noise. That comes across as false to me right away. But again, I'm watching the scene out of context, maybe I'll believe the illusion more when I see the actual scene. I certainly hope so.

    So Wednesday is the big day, when they decide whether to accept Maleficarum for a theatrical release. I think any answer you get will be a positive thing. If they allow it, you'll see how the movie plays to a paying audience. If they reject it, I would definitely use that to market the movie...the movie that was deemed too realistic and too harsh for theaters! They could do doing you a favor if they decide not to book it. Be sure and let us know what happens.


    John Galt: Great review of Don't Go in the House. As mentioned before, that scene does it for me every time. But I'm going to reject the contention that the burning scene was not shot with a mannequin. I just pulled out my copy and looked at it again. There's absolutely no way that's a real person. As far as the realistic movement, all you have to is slightly twist the burning figure from above to have it appear to be moving. Same with the shot of the burning hands, which only appear on screen for one second. It's a very impressive illusion, but wouldn't be hard to pull off that way. I would love to be proven wrong, anybody have a link to this interview with the director?

    The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.


    Bill K: I have Racing the Rain on my hard drive but there's no way I would be able to afford the bandwidth to host it. It's really an incredible achievement, because Matmos took live action (non BATS) video footage and inserted it into a totally digitally recreated fire setting. It's not realistically believable since you can tell the flames aren't real, but it's quite impressive nonetheless. Here's a still from it:


    We have a new story in our GIMP FICTION section. I haven't read all of it yet but what I have seen, I like a lot. It's was e-mailed to me by one of our posters named Osouk and it's called "INTO HELL". If you guys are into electric shock torture, this would be a good one to check out. Here's the direct link:

    He said if people like it, he has more he can share with the forum.

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 03:39:07 PM

    Name: Jane von Detlefson
    Homepage URL:

    Hey all, we will most likely have the DVD available for purchase before the 31st, we're still waiting for subtitles from translators right now. Because of the postal system, which varies a great deal from country to country, we're not able to guarantee a 31st arrival. However, for those who really can't wait, download it!

    Ralphus - Regarding the second teaser with the roasting, that is direct sound we took from the coals, they make that snap crackle pop sound, much like rice crispies. We had over 150 lbs of coals underneath me, when they become red hot, they make that crackling noise for about an hour until they die down. Believe me, I was there, watching them the entire day, two days of shooting, in fact. Small amounts of coals, like the amount used in a hibachi, don't make that sound, because they disperse the heat at a more rapid rate. Why do I sound like a mad science teacher?

    I'll put my two cents in about BATS later, I'm exhausted after working all weekend, no rest for the wicked...

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 04:34:46 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    Jane von Detlefson: That's good news that you took the audio directly from the coals, because honestly, the only thing I had to compare with it was the sound of coals from a barbeque. Having never seen (nor heard) what 150 pounds of burning coals is like, I guess I was somewhat ignorant on that aspect. Thanks for setting me straight. I may end up enjoying the scene even more now that I know that.

    It's hard to imagine what it must have been like to be suspended over a pit of burning coals like that, enduring the heat and the smoke. I guess we'll find out more when we get to see the scene and hear you talk about it. In a way, I'm almost looking forward to hearing the commentary track even more so than the movie. Anybody else feel that way?

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 04:55:32 PM

    Name: Jane von Detlefson
    Homepage URL:

    Ralphus - Yeah, Previous to shooting that scene I thought coals didn't make any sound either. I think it also depends upon the type of coals, we used pure hardwood coals (for that "authentic flavor"), I'm pretty sure that the coals used in barbecues are briquets, which are manufactured, mixed with all kinds of stuff and pressed.

    Another reason (other than really wanting to lie on the couch right now with an audiobook) that I don't want to gab too much about the BATS and the roasting is that it'll be old news by the time ya'll listen to the commentary and whatnot.

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 05:07:06 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Thanks Ralphus for the response to my Matmos video post. I may try Sendspace share big file site later.

    I believe I was the one that asked why there was no whip and torture marks on Stormrider's art but I was only curious to why not. But in the case of today's picture it does fit for sure and that you could call the whipping marks rape foreplay.

    As the looking forward to the commentary track goes, it's added gravy to me or in this case Jane roast scene BBQ sauce. I wonder if Jane had that barbecued smell as she was being spit roasted but I'm sure it wasn't that hot or was it? If so that's got to be an erotic feeling to smell yourself cooking.

    Bill K.

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 06:21:11 PM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    Margot: If someone found that drinking fresh milk from a cow and soon later having a not very well cooked piece of pork meat made people dead, then the ordnance of the high priests would be "do not eat milk and eat pig" and some would go as far as forbidding pigs altogether. Eating pork, thus, becomes a sin.

    Uncontrolled sex was a source of disease like no other thus "the wages of sin are death". Prostitutes were cast out of villages because they carried within the evils of such sins. Simply put, sex caused many to go extremely ill and die.

    Sorry, but both of these are incorrect. There's overwhelming evidence to refute the theory that Jewish dietary laws came from observation. And prostitution flourished in most societies -- autocratic patriarchies tend to send it underground to better control the population.


    I hope the commentary to Maleficarum will be subtitled / Closed Captioned. I hate when DVD extras aren't CCed -- deaf and hard-of-hearing folks aren't as interested in the extras as anyone else!

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 08:31:40 PM

    Name: carnyx
    E-mail address:

    To weigh in on the BATS discussion. I never found burning at the stake a turn on. But the branding iron is second only to the whip as my favorite torture device. Take care. Robert

    Sunday, October 16th 2011 - 09:32:09 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Terrific WOW poser art Stormrider. Please Ralphus Keep them cuming. I'm thinking bush fire alert for sure and I hope that guy holding the red hot iron is thinking the same thing.

    Bill K.

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 12:44:29 AM

    Name: daniel
    E-mail address:

    Does stormrider have a site? Would like to browse his art. His pics are really good!

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 03:17:33 AM

    Name: Matt

    Re: Stormrider having a site or posting it to a forum like!

    As for red-hot tongs being used, they were mainly used for straightforward punishment purposes: there's an episode of The Tudors where a leader of a revolt against Henry VIII has a red-hot poker shoved up his ass (before being hanged, drawn, and quartered). No doubt others who met that fate had the poker treatment administered-along with the rack-before receiving their offical punishment.....

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 04:05:26 AM

    Name: Simon

    Dear Bman and all of the members: Where can I find the information about "Deadly Interrogation III"? Truely love the branding torture scene!!! Thank you very much!!

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 10:46:27 AM

    Name: carnyx
    E-mail address:

    Did anybody else hear that Charlies Angels was cancelled? I noticed the by far the best looking one (Minka Kelly) got the worst treatment. Take care. Robert

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 10:59:58 AM

    Name: Stormrider

    Sorry, all. Modem is (still) on the fritz so I haven't been able to post in a while. To all who have asked: sorry, I don't have a site. I have (rarely) posted at the Dark Spot and also I have a small gallery at Renderotica. You who frequent the board here have seen a lot more of my work (mistakes and all) than either of the other sites.

    Thanks for all the kind words regarding my artwork.

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 11:53:01 AM

    Name: Bill K.

    Stormrider may I suggest checking out site to have your web site (display your art). It has a large number of poser artists of all kinds as well as drawing, manip and photograph art of all kinds.

    It free to join to view and copy pictures there but not sure about artist members cost. I guessing that it is a lot less costly than having your own site or joining a pay site. You can join Stakedamsels forum but it a fiery peril only site which is problem with most free sites there only want a certain type of peril art.

    Bill K.

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 03:04:14 PM

    Name: carnyx
    E-mail address:

    Hello- I just wanted to thank Covers here on the board for going to all the trouble to track down that comic book for me. Take care. Robert

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 05:00:08 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Short post tonight (relatively). Wrist aches from repetitive job-related computer tasks. Started this yesterday, apologize in advance if I fail to acknowledge anyone.

    jhlipton: I think Margot was referring to the dietary experiences of humans thousands of years before the founding of Judaism. It's also interesting to note that Islam has similar restrictions about eating pork. One theory is that the dry climate of the Middle East is not favorable to pig-farming - which requires large, continuous sources of water. So the practice was discouraged, if not downright reviled. It's yet another example of a mundane problem getting layered over with social and religious considerations. (Don't worry, I'm going to make this relevant to GIMP).

    This theory is put forth in a fascinating book called Cows, Pigs, Wars and Witches which also provides, among other things, rare insights about witch-hunting. GIMPers will find that very interesting (as will others).

    Margot: It's great to have you stop by again with more goodies for us. And that part about how all of you got together was very intriguing. But I'm wondering what it was that led an anthropologist into movie-making. Maybe there's hope yet for someone with a Sociology degree like me.

    John Galt: Thanks for filling that hole in the review database with your write-up of Don't Go in the House. Great caps, too - these look sharper than the images in my copy of the movie.

    Couldn't agree with you more about that scene and the movie as a whole. A terrific job by the actress in an otherwise lackluster flick.

    I thought that showing the charred body after the first flaming helped set up the later scenes, where all you saw were the crispy critters, but you understood how they got that way. Still, it would have been nice to see more naked victims and fewer aftermath shots.

    Ralphus and Bill K.: Thanks for "telling and showing" us about Racing the Rain. That's a fine-looking cap.

    I didn't find the movie on IMDb. Is it available anywhere, and more importantly, do you think it has enough GIMPage to make pursuing it worthwhile?

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 06:25:08 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    YikYakker wrote:

    Ralphus and Bill K.: Thanks for "telling and showing" us about Racing the Rain...I didn't find the movie on IMDb. Is it available anywhere, and more importantly, do you think it has enough GIMPage to make pursuing it worthwhile?

    That is because it was never a movie YikYakker. Matmos was one of the first manip bats artist to post his manip bats art on www in the 1990s and lot of today's manip bats artist say they were inspired to do their bats artwork because of his work.

    The only place I know you can download it is site. It's only one minute long and not formatted for DVD TV viewing, only PC viewing.

    Bill K.

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 08:15:37 PM

    Name: John Galt

    YikYakker: Wow, Cows, Pigs, Wars and Witches looks fascinating. Just the kind of reading I enjoy. It is kind of annoying that the Kindle version costs more than the paperback. Somehow, I think digital book sellers have lost sight of the fact that their costs are less--and anyone with any sense knows their costs are less--and it kind of makes them look greedy to jack up the price just because they can. Well, this sounds like a book I want on my bookshelf anyway, so I will probably just buy it in a print edition.

    * * * * *

    Jane von Detlefson: Great news that we may be able to pre-order Maleficarum. I have this aversion to downloading when it is in some proprietary format that requires a special reader or program to play. It is not a technical aversion, or a quality aversion. I think I just resent being limited in some way, even though the limitation makes no real difference. We all have our eccentricities

    Needless to say, I think I speak for many GIMPers when I say that I am anxiously awaiting word on how the Cinemateca screening went. Just curious.

    * * * * *

    As I was persuing my DVD shelf in search of Don't Go in the House, I happened to notice Hollow Man, and also recalled that there is not a review of it in the movies database either. It is in the soon-to-be-returning Rape Database. But I think it deserves the illustrated review treatment, if for no other reason than Rhona Mitra is the one getting raped. So here you go.

    * * * * *

    Hollow Man (2000)

    Finally, an invisible man movie that features an invisible man doing what you would expect an invisible man to do--take advantage of women. Kevin Bacon stars as the titular character who experiments on himself with an invisibility formula that has the unfortunate side effect of driving him mad. But not before it unleashes his twisted libido. That is the plot in a nutshell, so I am going to spend all my time on the three GIMP-ish scenes.

    First of all, about 41 minutes into the movie, the scientists are taking turns monitoring the invisible Sebastian Kane (Kevin Bacon) overnight. Sarah (Kim Dickens) is on watch and falls asleep. Sebastian sneaks in, unbuttons and opens her shirt, and fondles her naked breast. She wakes up and of course does not see him, and she can see by the infrared camera trained on his bed that he is not in bed. But he slips back into bed shortly afterward, so she is left strongly suspecting he felt her up.
    Sarah gets felt up
    The best scene comes next, at the 58 minute mark. Sebastian leaves the lab and goes back to his apartment. He catches sight of a hot chick in the neighboring building who partially undresses, closes one of her curtains, but strides back into the other room topless before walking out again to take a shower. Oh, and did I mention the hot chick is Rhona Mitra? Yowza.
    Rhona Mitra being watched
    Sebastian says to himself, "Who's gonna know?" and takes off one of his plastic skin-colored gloves, revealing an invisible hand.

    Rhona Mitra's character has no name, as far as I can determine, but instead of being referred to as "Rape Victim" she is referred to as "Sebastian's neighbor." So Rhona Mitra is just finishing her obligatory horror movie shower scene when her doorbell rings. She puts on a robe and answers the door, but no one is there. She walks out in the hall to make sure, leaving her door wide open. Of course.
    Rhona Mitra checks the hallway
    She walks back in but senses something. She looks around, but sees nothing. She sits down at her vanity and rubs moisturizing cream onto her lovely shoulders, baring her shapely breasts as she does so. The mirror tilts down. She looks alarmed and confused, and tilts it back level. It tilts up.
    Rhona Mitra at the mirror
    She jumps up, alarmed. She is grabbed and forced toward the bed as she screams in terror and confusion.
    Rhona Mitra's rape, Part One
    She is pushed back on the bed, screaming and struggling as one of her breasts pops out of the robe. We cut away to Elizabeth Shue's character arriving on the street below, in search of Sebastian.
    Rhona Mitra being raped
    Back to Rhona Mitra on her bed. She is screaming and her body is arching up and down as she is brutally raped.
    Rhona Mitra raped some more
    We cut away once more, back to Elizabeth Shue in Sebastian's apartment with, ironically, Rhona Mitra's apartment clearly visible in the background. When we return to Rhona, she is curled up on the bed, holding her robe around her body, bruised and crying.
    Rhona Mitra's rape, part Two
    The final GIMP scene is a dream sequence with Elizabeth Shue at the 1 hour, 7 minute mark. She is in bed, asleep. An invisible Sebastian slowly pulls off her covers.
    Elizabeth Shue in bed
    Sebastian unbuttons her blouse (but we don't see her breasts), then pulls her panties down and off of her shapely legs.
    Elizabeth Shue's panties are removed
    Invisible Sebastian suddenly and roughly pushes her knees apart (I love that part) and, apparently, violates her. We see her head thrown back in painful surprise, then she sits up in bed and it was all a dream. But what a dream.
    Elizabeth Shue dreams she is raped
    The movie concludes with lots of violence, blood and gore, but no more GIMP.

    SUMMARY: One fondling (Kim Dickens), one brutal rape (Rhona Mitra), and one dream sequence almost-rape (Eizabeth Shue).

    The stalking and brutal rape of Rhona Mitra is exceptional, and on the strength of that scene alone, I grade this a solid B.

    This movie is available from Amazon, BUT THIS: The original movie did not include the best parts of Rhona Mitra's rape. It cut away as she was surprised and struggling before she was pushed onto the bed, then returned with her curled up on the bed afterwards and crying. (It's missing two and a half of the photo montages above.) The Special Edition has more, but not all, of the rape sequence in an extra "deleted scenes" DVD feature, and lists for $12.70 on Amazon. (It's missing the middle two of the actual rape photo montages above.) The Director's Cut is seven minutes longer and includes the entire rape sequence, albeit still with a couple of cut-aways to break up the action. The Director's Cut sells for only $6.99 on Amazon, so that's the way to go. Just watch which version you are getting.

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 09:21:55 PM

    Name: Fritz

    Ralphus wrote:

    But I'm going to reject the contention that the burning scene was not shot with a mannequin. I just pulled out my copy and looked at it again. There's absolutely no way that's a real person.

    So you think I'm just making this up? Before you posted this, I even e-mailed you about the article and what magazine it was in, but that still wasn't good enough? Man, you have some serious trust issues.

    Anyway, I was all smugly set to prove you wrong when I discovered the Ellison interview does not appear in any recent issue of Video Watchdog, which is where I thought I read this. Quelle surprise. I next checked VideoScope, which covers similar fare, but NFL there either - though I still haven't exhausted that route. I took a cursory glance through the recent issues of another half dozen film mags I subscribe to and sadly have not found what I'm looking for.

    So now I can't be so smug... yet. I do know it was an interview in a hardcopy magazine (and I rarely throw them out, which is why this is no maddening), that it was published in the last two years or so, and that aside from Ellison's work on DGITH, it also covered his subsequent music career and featured a picture of him in his studio. If this rings a bell with anyone, please let us know and help me put the mannequin obsessed midget in his place.

    Yet even without the smoking gun, I just don't see the actual footage supporting the mannequin theory as Ralphus claims. First, the body moves in a very lifelike way, not like a GI Joe doll or even a stuffed marionette. In particular, watch her head and hands when the fire first hits her. Second, the shape of the body precisely matches the um... contours of the actress. Third, how do you explain the close up shot of the hands, which clearly are real and similarly engulfed in flames. If the filmmakers used the composite technique here, why not for the full body shot as well?

    Finally, after expanding my research to include my collection of British 'zines, I was thrilled (and somewhat surprised) to find a Joseph Ellison interview. Imagine my dismay when it turns out not to be the one I was hunting. Nonetheless, it's still a great read and includes other interesting tidbits about the film, including the real name of the actress who plays the ill-fated Kathy. You can read it here. By the way, the article is from Is It Uncut? #23.

    * * * * *

    Scribbler wrote:

    There's one image I could've gone my whole life without seeing.

    I'll go out on a limb here and assume you are referring to the picture I posted of Deadly Interrogation III (as it's the last image before your ambiguous post). If so, I'm not sure what to make of your comment, but if I offended your tender sensibilities, my apologies. Frankly, I thought GIMPers were made of sterner stuff. And to be honest, I don't see how what I posted is that different from the pics featured in Margot's update or Rick's Goon Squad 2 caps. What next? Do we now have to self-censor what we put up here to keep from offending those who think a good peril scene involves feathers and ice cubes?

    And if the limb I went out on just snapped because you were referring to a different image, please tell us which one it is so I can defend whoever posted it.

    * * * * *

    John Galt: Thanks for your excellent review of DGITH. I completely agree with your assessment, especially with respect to the relative GIMP discrepancy between that one scene and the rest of the movie. It made me wonder what other films have a single, incredibly intense, over the top sequence like this, and virtually no other female peril worth noting.

    One that comes to mind is Cannibal Ferox, which features Zora Kerova hanging around in a rather unique manner, but nothing else of interest to us (although there are a few icky parts where males are tortured). There's also the dunking scene in Il Camorrista (although the complete version of the film may have more). Any others that fit the bill? I'm not talking about movies which have just a single GIMP scene (there's millions of 'em), but those in which that single scene is relatively extreme and stands out like a golfing gorilla because not one other female character suffers so much as a broken nail.

    * * * * *

    Simon: I guess you and Scribbler won't be bonding any time soon. Click on the Deadly Interrogation III image and it will take you to the PKF online store at Nicheclips. There you will see more details and some preview pictures. Unfortunately, you now need to be a Nicheclips member to view the descriptions as well as to buy the videos. I believe membership is free, though.

    Also, if anyone is interested (and no one takes offense), I could post the full script I submitted to John. That way those who are considering custom videos can see how close a good producer gets to capturing the original idea.

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 10:44:32 PM

    Name: John Galt

    Fritz: Thanks for the link to that Ellison article. I noticed a couple of the stills they used did not appear in the movie. I don't think the movie ever dropped low enough to show her bush (to that extent, anyway) while she was chained up, and I don't remember a side view of her arching back as he poured gasoline on her. But it was still an incredible scene. Lots of interesting tidbits. So Johanna Brushay was also a Playboy Bunny. I wonder if she ever appeared in any of the magazines?

    Monday, October 17th 2011 - 11:28:48 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    I posted/downloaded Matmos "Racing the Rain" at You tube

    I believe it to be the only manip type bats video created. Ralphus is that correct? Not sure about other type peril manip videos were created either but think there would be some out there. Right?

    Bill K.

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 02:11:34 AM

    Name: Scribbler

    Scribbler wrote:

    There's one image I could've gone my whole life without seeing.

    I'll go out on a limb here and assume you are referring to the picture I posted of Deadly Interrogation III (as it's the last image before your ambiguous post). If so, I'm not sure what to make of your comment, but if I offended your tender sensibilities, my apologies. Frankly, I thought GIMPers were made of sterner stuff. And to be honest, I don't see how what I posted is that different from the pics featured in Margot's update or Rick's Goon Squad 2 caps. What next? Do we now have to self-censor what we put up here to keep from offending those who think a good peril scene involves feathers and ice cubes?

    And if the limb I went out on just snapped because you were referring to a different image, please tell us which one it is so I can defend whoever posted it.

    Yep, that's the image.

    No need to apologize, you can post what you want (as long as the moderator approves). I once posted an image the moderator removed.

    No, you can't paint all GIMPers with the same we're-all-made-of-the-same-sterness brush. Some of us, OK, one of us, is a more lightweight GIMPer than others.

    To be honest, I see a difference to the other images you mention above. If you don't see that, that's fine, not everyone sees things in the same way. Not everyone has the same sensibilities. I once had this conversation with Ralphus. Sometimes there's a horrible accident and there's blood and gruesomeness all around. There are people tasked with the job of cleaning up after such an accident. I'm grateful that people exist that can do that job. Cause it's needed. However, I'm not one who could do it, and that's just the way it is.

    Do you have to self-censor? No, you can do what the fuck you want. And others, includiing me, can comment. Would I prefer the more gruesome images were text links to images, so I don't have to see them, but others who want to see it, are of sterner stuff, can click on the link and see the image just fine. Sure, I'd go for that. But since I'm the only lightweight GIMPer here, there's no need to do that. Do what you want. Far as I know, this is that kind of forum. Screw the lightweight GIMPers, there's only one of me anyway. :)

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 03:12:13 AM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    John Galt: Thanks for the review (and caps) of Hollow Man. I know I've seen parts of the rape scene with Rhona Mitra, but I probably saw the edited version, since there was additional footage but it was in the extras section and not in the actual movie. I'm just glad that extra footage is available somewhere. Rhona Mitra is a hottie who appears to be drawn to roles where she's tied up and/or abused, based on her screen resume. In fact, she's already a Ralphus Award winner for her suspension torture scene in Doomsday, so she's my kind of actress.

    The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.


    Fritz wrote:

    So you think I'm just making this up? Before you posted this, I even e-mailed you about the article and what magazine it was in, but that still wasn't good enough? Man, you have some serious trust issues.

    Ha! I don't trust anyone who's taller than me.

    It's not a matter of trust, I just really want to see the evidence, because as much as you say it's impossible that was a mannequin, I can make the same arguments that it was. In the initial long shot where the flame is heading for her, notice the frozen expression on her face, which stays that way from start to finish. Yeah, it's only about a second-long shot, but in freeze-frame, she looks a little different from the live woman we saw earlier. And the movement I mentioned, even in the brief shot of the hands, could be explained away by controlling the action from above. Everything is obscured because of the dancing flames and you don't really get a clear look. Like I say, I just want to be proven wrong. Either way, it's a very impressive illusion.


    Bill K.: Thanks for the video link for Racing the Rain. You're a braver man than me for putting that on YouTube. I just recently had one of my videos removed by YouTube's censors for "nudity and/or sexual content" (it had neither). Someone didn't like it and flagged it, and off it went. No way I would post a video of a naked women being BATS like that, even though I've seen a lot worse on YouTube.


    Scribbler wrote:

    No need to apologize, you can post what you want (as long as the moderator approves). I once posted an image the moderator removed.

    If I recall correctly, I didn't remove it but changed it to a link instead. That was back in our Tripod days and I was fearful about what would be allowed once the posts were updated to the archives. Of course now, we have a lot more freedom.

    Regarding the posting of "squeamish" images, we don't want to offend anyone and trust me, you are NOT the only lightweight GIMPer here. I got taken to task when I posted some bloodless vidcaps of a woman being sawed in half earlier this year. The intention was never to mock any of our more sensitive readers or rub anyone's nose in it. The thing is, we have some pretty harsh images that are posted every day on this forum. Not just artworks, but vidcaps, too. If that branding pic is too hard, what about the bloody stills of Jane from Maleficarum? Not to mention images of her being burned at the stake? Where do you draw the line?

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 08:55:01 AM

    Name: Sloth

    John Galt - a belated thanks for the review on "Don't Go In The House" - thought the chick in the car breakdown sequence was quite a wasted opportunity - no torment, no torture, nothing but chained crispy critter hands - and as I recall we really never got a good shot of what she looked like - pity - now "Hollow Man" I'd never heard of but I've always reserved a cell in my dungeon for Elizabeth Shue.

    Bill K. - thanks for the link to that manip - quite well done considering the limitations - any interested Gimpers need to grab a look before the YouTube Morality Police whack that one.

    And now to discover we may pre-order "Maleficarum" - this day is beginning nicely.

    Stay well all

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 09:20:51 AM

    Name: SharedJoy


    If Fritz' picture is the dividing line between "lightweight" and "heavyweight" GIMPers, then count me as one more "lightweight" GIMPer lurking about. :)

    As you say; people are free to post what they want, within Ralphus' rules. We can't all have identical tastes; that's why the board exists in the first place!

    My personal line is around the "marks" level. Pain and torture WITHOUT marks -- all good. A few marks is OK, if it emphasizes the pain/suffering aspect. Too many marks is a distraction, and blood/gore/feces/vomit is all gross and an active turn-off.

    That's me; that's my kink. Helplessness, suffering. Bondage and nudity are good; they CONTRIBUTE nicely. But even those aren't NECESSARY -- it's the female helplessness I enjoy. ( is almost always good, except for when they play with needles. HOM with their "love bondage" is boring as hell; the models aren't supposed to ENJOY it!)

    [All the talk about BATS fascinates me. In my head, there's the build-up -- the threat, the fear, the struggling, all yummy -- and then the fire is lit, and we go from terror and pain, to... barbeque. Yuck. But lots of folks like it, so... to each his own.]

    I guess that's the point. To each his own. Lots of great stuff here, so, keep up the good work, Ralphus! :)

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 11:50:16 AM

    Name: mr bush

    john galt- thanks for the review of don't go in the house. Always one of my favorites of all time, a women with a nice head of hair, full body , and a nice bush below all displayed for the camera.

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 02:08:08 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    You are welcome Ralphus and when the Tea Party nuts storms my house and bats me you guys get it on film I hope. Seriously I surprised they did acccept it but maybe it got lost in back pages with the other posted boring no one cares about video posts because of the name "Racing The Rain". If it just stays online for a couple a days that will be good enough for me. This video is my ideal bats fantasy should look like but much slower burning, at least 10 minutes but with no gag, which the Maleficarum movie is going to have plus a whole lots more. Bill K.

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 02:55:52 PM

    Name: Scribbler

    Ralphus wrote:

    ...The thing is, we have some pretty harsh images that are posted every day on this forum. Not just artworks, but vidcaps, too. If that branding pic is too hard, what about the bloody stills of Jane from Maleficarum? Not to mention images of her being burned at the stake? Where do you draw the line?

    Well, I would not know where to draw the line for anyone other than me! It's a subjective judgment or opinion call. Like I already said "not everyone sees things in the same way. Not everyone has the same sensibilities."

    So where would I draw the line. Well, I wouldn't really. People can post pics, and others can comment, like I did. Would I rather the more gruesome pics were text links. Yeah, I already said that. But it's not my call, I don't make the rules.

    The Jane BATS pics, while I'm not a BATS fan, don't look all that gruesome to me. The bloody stills I'm not a fan off, but didn't bother me all that much. So the Fritz pic was not my cup of tea, and I said so. There are probably some who see the distinction, and others who don't.

    SharedJoy has a good post. I'm pretty much in her camp.

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 06:37:02 PM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    Time to catch up on a few things.


    John Galt: Nice work once again, this time on the review and caps of Hollow Man. Unfortunately, it's not my thing. I must lack the imagination to get into the invisible abductor concept. In fact, a few months back, I was thinking about reviewing Rick's film, The Incubus, but the film didn't work for me and I abandoned the idea (I reviewed Trojan Horse instead). I can't imagine Hollow Man working any better for me.


    The other night, I had a chance to watch Attackers ATID-190, which I know MeetThePryz and I -- and possibly others -- had wanted to see. Regrettably, it was only a so-so movie. It had some nice moments but it's nothing exceptional.


    Lightweights vs. heavyweights: I'm pretty sure I fall into the lightweight category. For example, I don't understand why whipping scenes need to show blood. The gore only messes up a woman's appearance. In my world, if the victim looks credibly restrained and she can sell her reactions to each snap of the whip, that's good enough for me.

    Actually, if we can find a way to get Ralphus to stop daydreaming about Maleficarum and focus, we may find there's a GIMP poll question in the lightweight/heavyweight discussion.

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 06:39:22 PM

    Name: Scribbler

    I saw Hollow Man in the theater way back when. I thought it sucked, as did my date. Reading John's review it's evident I saw the edited version. Not sure I want to spend $7 just to see the longer Rhona Mitra scene. Think I'll wait to see if it turns up somewhere else.

    Thanks for the review and info.

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 06:43:44 PM

    Name: John Galt

    Scribbler: I understand your reluctance to spend good money for just the one great scene from Hollow Man. I checked YouTube for the unedited scene in its entirety, but couldn't find it. The scene you would have seen in the theater is here. The deleted scene from the Extended Version DVD is here. There is more to the scene, but instead of showing it all, the deleted scene clip cuts to Paul Verhoeven talking about why he cut the scene, as if we really give a damn. Just show us the whole cut sequence, dude!

    Tuesday, October 18th 2011 - 07:04:33 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    I love the different looking type of the horses Stormrider uses for each picture. Never looks the same. Very imaginative of him and still I am a bats/fiery peril fan at heart but this horse torture beginning to stir-rup my erotic peril interest too.

    Racing the Rain still up and running.

    Bill K.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 01:00:40 AM

    Name: SharedJoy

    Scribbler: Do I SOUND female? (Don't answer. I'm afraid the answer is yes.) I admit, my chosen nick would be an awesome one, were I actually a female, and named "Joy". :)

    Re Hollow Man: I loved the scenes in question. (I've seen the "deleted scenes" version of the main rape scene; I had no idea there was a director's cut with even MORE.) An Invisible Man (done well) works perfectly for me -- any visible male body parts are a waste of screen space.

    If there's a point to the movie BEYOND "an invisible man fools around with hot babes", the point was lost on me. :)

    Speaking of nothing in particular, has anyone else seen the rape scene from the obscure movie Chaos?

    There may be more than one scene, but the "main" scene (as far as I know) is a classic "starts perfectly for me, then quickly goes WAY WAY over my line" type of thing.

    As the scene starts, Hot Girl is trying to escape from a gang of bad guys in the woods. One of the subordinate bad guys grabs her, drags her a bit, and drops her to the ground. The others are still some distance away, and she starts begging, please, I'll do anything you want -- ANYTHING! -- just get me out of here before Leader Guy gets me and kills me...

    [VERY nice begging, even though for some reason, Hot Girl never opens her eyes through the entire scene.]

    Cut to Leader Guy getting word that Hot Girl is caught, and just as Subordinate Guy is looking like he might take her up on her offer, Leader Guy shows up and the girl starts screaming.

    Leader Guy proceeds to cut off her clothes, and then... pretty much destroys Hot Girl, very much along the lines of Fritz' picture below (which I'm sure is what made me think of this), BEFORE raping her right there in the woods.

    I simply cannot describe how much I wish Leader Guy had done these two things in the reverse order. I pretty much HAVE to stop the clip once her clothes are off...

    Anyway, just thought I'd share. :)

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 01:34:31 AM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    I have to say, on this board, the readers run the gamete from one extreme to the other. On one side, we have our friend Fritz praising his PKF custom Deadly Interrogation III, which John Marshall describes on his site as the most brutal movie he's ever done. It's full of some nasty entertainment, like beating, and then moving on to cutting off nipples with pliers and then using a branding iron on what's left of her breasts. Oh, and blood. Lots and lots of blood. So much so that it looks like she took a bath in barbeque sauce. I have to say that even though a lot of blood turns me off, it looks like over-the-top fun. And who's to begrudge Fritz for liking the extreme stuff? Just for the shits and giggles, let's call him Mr. Heavyweight.

    On the other side of the fence is our buddy Scribbler. We'll call him Mr. Lightweight. He doesn't care for extreme images, and who can blame him? Even though he was brought up with the classic work of John Blakemore, a man who pushed the envelope with bloody fishhooks through nipples and spiked dildos in pussies, he still prefers his damsels unsullied. No blood, no gore, and certainly nothing that would leave disfiguring marks on her skin. Seems reasonable to me. I think a lot of people feel the same. I would say nearly 100% of Brian's Pagers probably feel that way.

    In a fantasy scenario, and that's what this entertainment is, in which side are you leaning toward? I know in boxing, a lightweight would never be pared against a heavyweight. Not a fair fight. But this is an extreme bondage discussion forum and anything goes. The first rule of GIMP Club is - you do not talk about GIMP Club.

    Oh, but you DO have to post about it. In fact, you're REQUIRED to pick a side. It's the classic battle of Extreme Vs. Mild. For instance, you can whip her but you can't mark her up. Or you can be brutal and lash her damn near half to death. You get the picture?

    Even though parts of the Heavyweight category are a bit extreme even for this sadistic midget, I think I'm leaning closer to that than the Lightweight category. I can't wait for Maleficarum, for instance. That's a film with harsh whipping, branding, roasting and burning at the stake, among other delights. And I can see good points on both sides. I think given a choice, most of us would end up right in the middle. That's why I'm not making that an option. There can be only one side or the other in terms of how you vote. So choose, and choose wisely.

    If you had to rate yourself as a GIMPer, where would you lean?
    A: Heavyweight - Nearly anything goes in my fantasies
    B. Lightweight - I don't really want her to see her hurt

    There is no right or wrong answer here. And I expect a lot of people will have a difficult time deciding, but you have to pick one or the other. Who will win? Well, this election has just begun. And we WILL be keeping score. So get out the vote!

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 01:38:53 AM

    Name: John Galt

    Poll Question: Although this strikes me as asking for a True/False answer to a Multiple Choice or Discussion question, I would definitely fall on the Heavyweight side of the middle. I prefer my hot, sexy, beautiful victims tortured and abused but unmarked, but marking them does not spoil the scene for me. At least, not most of the time. I will admit that the image that started this topic did not do anything for me. I did not respond positively or negatively--I just noted it and moved on.

    If you were to judge me by how I spend my money, though, you would notice that I purchase sexual abuse but generally "non-marking" stuff from Powershotz or a LOT more often than "marking" and snuff-themed stuff from PFK. I would certainly suffer "rapist's remorse" if I ended up with a broken toy.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 02:30:30 AM

    Name: Bill K.

    Where does masochism and sadism fit into the Heavyweight vs. lightweight poll? Can you be a masochism and be a heavy or be a sadism and be a light? I personally can not hurt a mouse or women but my fantasy is on heavy (fiery peril is heavy and dungeon torture is heavy) side so that makes a heavy masochism I guess, right? Also I like to see (imagine) myself in the eyes of the witch burning at the stake and feel (imagine) her fear and pain. It's Nuts I know, so I am (vote) masochism heavyweight.

    Bill K.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 02:49:24 AM

    Name: Scribbler

    B. Lightweight - I don't really want to see her majorly damaged.

    Girls In Merciless Peril But Only Mild Damage If Any! So GIMPBOMDIA. That's where I live :)

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 03:31:24 AM

    Name: Fritz

    Ralphus wrote:

    I have to say, on this board, the readers run the gamete from one extreme to the other. On one side, we have our friend Fritz praising his PKF custom Deadly Interrogation III, which John Marshall describes on his site as the most brutal movie he's ever done.

    Good lord, man... somehow, you've managed to polarize the entire GIMP community. All 17 of us. I'll "weigh" in on this heavy vs. light debate later, but do you really think we will fall neatly into one of these two camps? As the apparent poster boy for the right... um, left... um, libertarian... oh yeah, "heavyweight GIMPer" faction, I'm not sure I can properly represent even my own team. If a lightweight scene turns me on, does that mean I'm not really, you know... oh god, how will I tell my parents? I know what you're after here, but I don't think it's as clear-cut as you may think.

    I suspect most readers will struggle with this question as there is no clear dividing line between red and blue. Blood? Marks on the body? Penetration? Death? Some "je ne sais quois" element that elevates a scene from light to heavy? For a lot of us, it won't be easy. That said, I still think it's a valid poll. As GIMPers we are already far to one side of some median which divides perverts from the Cleaver family, but can we be further distinguished? I suppose the responses to this poll will tell.

    In the meantime, what the fuck is a 'gamete'? Sounds like something I should have memorized for a high school biology test. I've run the gamut from the woodpile to the back forty, and still can't find where I left that bloody chainsaw. Damn.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 03:48:46 AM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    GIMP POLL: If you had to rate yourself as a GIMPer, where would you lean?

    I'm somewhere in the middle. I love death-fetish, so killing the girl is a plus (there's always more where she came from!). I don't mind some blood (say, 2 or three shots or stabbings) as long as it doesn't get out of hand (and leave the damn breasts and nipples alone -- those are the best parts!).

    If I HAVE to chose, I'll come down as a Heavyweight.


    Yik Yakker: One theory is that the dry climate of the Middle East is not favorable to pig-farming - which requires large, continuous sources of water.

    Pigs also eat what humans do, so they compete for those resources. If you take the milk from a cow, the calf won't have as much -- that **could** be the basis for the meat/milk restriction. I have no clue where the shell-fish and cloven hoof thing came from.

    Kosher and halal have a lot of common points, but almost as many differences. Odd, considering they're both based out of Leviticus.


    John Galt: Finally, an invisible man movie that features an invisible man doing what you would expect an invisible man to do--take advantage of women.

    The "Invisible Maniac" did tear the blouses off two of his victims (a third was already nude). No rape, but one of the best drownings I've ever seen.

    I saw "Hollow man" when it first came out, and boy, howdy, were those HOT scenes! The movie, as a movie, is pretty good too..


    re "There's one image I could've gone my whole life without seeing

    I didn't see that as Scribbler asking it not to be posted, just that it was off-putting to him. In other words, "nothing to get worked about; Strawberry Fields forever".


    SharedJoy: Speaking of nothing in particular, has anyone else seen the rape scene from the obscure movie Chaos?

    I have an edited version up at Dark Fetish Net (I took out the part where he cuts off her nipple and makes her eat it) -- but you have to be a member to see it.

    I finally saw the other killing (via knife to snatch) but it was awful -- poorly lit, and you couldn;t see the girl's tits as they killed her. The first killing is definitely better.

    Leader Guy proceeds to cut off her clothes, and then... pretty much destroys Hot Girl, very much along the lines of Fritz' picture below (which I'm sure is what made me think of this), BEFORE raping her right there in the woods.

    She's not QUITE dead when he rapes her, but it would have been nicer if he started raping her BEFORE he kills her. ("Henry, Portrait of a Serial Killer" gets this part right.)

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 05:20:05 AM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    BTW, I also have the drowning from "Invisible Maniac" up at Dark Fetish Net.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 05:23:21 AM

    Name: Sloth

    Poll question - like Fritz, I think there are so many variables on this a simple this side or that is tough - so I will fall back on my last stint in psychoanalysis where I was diagnosed as borderline sociopath - heavyweight Gimper here.

    SharedJoy - I wrote a review on review of "Chaos" and recommended it - oddly, I personally did not care for it that much but thought if someone is looking for a gruesome, realistic rape scene then that one fills the bill - that one elicited an "ouch" upon viewing.

    Scribbler - so this poll leads to "GIMPBOMDIA" - well, if not a sovereign nation at least a new entry to the Gimp dictionary - as a heavyweight will have to ponder where I live.

    Stay well all

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 08:39:56 AM

    Name: Greg

    If you had to rate yourself as a GIMPer, where would you lean?
    A: Heavyweight - Nearly anything goes in my fantasies
    B. Lightweight - I don't really want her to see her hurt

    Interesting point! I really have to lean on heavyweight. I really do want to see her hurt, though I will put in the reservation that I allow this to live in my fantasies only. I have no real desire to truly hurt anything or anyone, but it's a nice mind game to play.

    As for much of what goes on at the gimp site I don't have any real interest in. BATS, rape, etc. I already have too many hang ups to really wish to garner any more and so I don't try and realize the attraction of such fantasies.

    I am really into flogging and caning. Preferably judicially ordained ones. I really like that and movies that have those scenes in them were a real buzz for me, though I did like the Story of O if only for the delicious Corrinne Clery and that sweaty scene in the bedroom when that clutz sees her whipped and broken, tied and naked and...runs away!!! Shit what would I have given to stand astride the delicious Miss Clery that day, oh yes!!

    Other films I have loved I have touched on in the past, so I wont bore anyone with those again, but it is sad isn't it, that so many of the films we have seen and loved seem to be things of the past. Where are the great torture scenes and floggings that made the cinema screens flicker and the hearts of little shits like me race. Perhaps the audiences of today are too sophisticated... Don't talk to me about sophistication, I've been to Leeds!

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 08:56:01 AM

    Name: Nia
    E-mail address:

    I'm a lightweight, but I'm coming at this from a different angle than most of you guys. As an active submissive, our line is "no permanent harm". There can be marks or even some occasional blood, but never anything permanent. As he says, "If I hurt you too much, you won't be able to take care of my stiffie in the morning."

    If all this sounds too consensual for your tastes, consider the pyschological torment rather than the physical next time. Most Gimp porn appeals only to men because the physicial is the focus. As a female, I identify with the victim, and if I can find something besides pain and terror, it's a good movie.

    Consider Renee Pornero in the recently reviewed "SExitus Interrutus". The dripping water scene is my favorite. Hours upon hours of psychological anguish only to be foiled by her own lust - fabulous!

    There are no limits on psychological damage and therefore that's where the fantasy should lie.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 09:54:17 AM

    Name: Baron von Folter
    E-mail address:

    Re the poll question: Given the two choices I go with Heavyweight.

    I understand why Ralphus chose to structure the poll this way but, as others have pointed out, it is much more complicated than that.

    Friedrich, Baron von Folter

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 10:08:02 AM

    Name: SharedJoy

    Re the Gimp Poll:

    "Don't want to see her hurt"?!?

    By *THAT* definition, I'd be a heavyweight. "Hurt" can just mean pain, which I'm all in favor of. :)

    I'd rather have had more options:

    1) Must be consensual. (Why are you reading this board?)
    2) Nonconsensual, but no pain.
    3) Pain, but no marks.
    4) Light marks OK.
    5) Heavy marks OK.
    6) Minor blood OK.
    7) Extreme blood/gore OK.

    On this scale, I'm a 4, where we were originally defining "heavyweight" at 6 or 7.

    GIMPBOMDIA. Yeah, that sounds like my neighborhood... :)

    [It's sad that we live in a society where disclaimers like the following are needed, but it should be reinforced that we are talking about FANTASY material, acted out only in fiction by paid actors, or in person with a willing partner PRETENDING to be unwilling for the sake of the fantasy. Anyone who can't draw this line, shouldn't be here.]

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 10:32:27 AM

    Name: Snidely Whiplash

    Classical railroad damsel-in-distress with a kinky Asian twist

    Now we just need a Locomotive and a Top-Hatted, Handlebar-Mustached Villain...

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 10:49:16 AM

    Name: mr bush

    Gimp poll-

    B for me, there are more ways than beating a women to make it good, words, humiliation, embarassment etc all work also.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 12:45:03 PM

    Name: JoeX

    Put me down for lightweight. Graphic torture is not of interest to me. Capture, enslavement, sexual humiliation, now you have my attention. Unlike many of you I don't even need bondage; a good blackmail fantasy works just fine.

    I suspect that answers in this poll will largely correlate to the earlier rape vs. torture question.

    Joe X

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 02:19:22 PM

    Name: mr bush


    I must say your images have full butts and strong thighs as a matter of fact.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 02:28:16 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    I have to clarify my masochism heavyweight vote in that torture whipping scars, bruises, bloody, burn scars and the alike scars all good to me but butchering cutting up/off any part the woman's body, especially the breasts is complete turn off to me. The human body can only take so much pain and loss of blood before it goes into shock/pass out and dies so cutting up/off body parts is counter productive for reason to torture. Cutting a woman's body up is killing them not torturing them to me.

    Heavyweight Bill K.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 02:39:36 PM

    Name: A Canadian

    The GIMP poll: I've already provided commentary, but now that there is an official vote, I choose B: Lightweight.

    I'm not squeamish about torture scenarios such as whippings if they're done right. Indeed, I have criticized J.J., Dan Hawke and others for not putting enough intensity into their whipping scenes.

    But the real erotic charge for me comes from seeing a woman who is helpless and struggling in a terrible situation, rather than in watching overly realistic depictions of violence. Some punishing slaps to the face, belly shots and other forms of violence do the trick for me. But burning someone's skin and other more extreme tortures do not work.

    John Galt's review of Don't Go in the House captured the distinction for me. I'm sure I would enjoy the scenes of the heroine struggling as she is helpless and realizes what is going to happen to her. But the actual depiction of her body burning to a crisp would do nothing for me.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 06:12:13 PM

    Name: Bman
    E-mail address:

    Have to go with HEAVYWEIGHT for me although he death thing is not a turn on. It's the interrogation and breakdown of a captured victim for me.

    Not to change course or to divert to another issue the vid caps of Don't Go in the House brings up another important element for me. It WUB. That's Wake Up Bound. The scene where the florist wakes up to see herself bound to the ceiling naked and her reaction is a big component for me. But like posted before the crispy body does nothing for me.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 07:12:25 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    Good early response so far. And here's the vote tallies as of this moment:

    Heavyweights - 8
    Lightweights - 6

    Ladies and gentlemen, we have a very close race. Be sure and get the vote out if you haven't yet. Posting your opinion can make a difference in the outcome.

    To answer those who thought it was rather simplistic to divide the choices into only 2 categories, that was done for a reason. Because honestly, if there were a third option, it would likely be 14-0 in favor of "in the middle". I think we're ALL in the middle, or darn near close to all of us. We all have various aspects of the fetish that turn us on, and turn us off. That was why I phrased the question as "which way you LEAN toward". That opens it up to having you explain the reasons why you feel the way the do. I really like to hear what makes people tick.

    As a follow-up, we should poll the ones who rated themselves as Lightweights and see if they're Rape Guys (or ladies) as opposed to Torture Guys. My guess is that most Torture Guys would fall into the Heavyweight class. But that's another poll for another day.


    Fritz wrote:

    In the meantime, what the fuck is a 'gamete'?

    Ha! That's what happens when you run your text through spell check and it gives you the wrong option and you accidentally click on it. Obviously, I meant to say "gamut". And now that you caught me on it and posted about it, I'll have to leave the wrong word in my post instead of correcting it. Damn you.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 07:28:49 PM

    Name: purpleviking
    E-mail address:

    If we only have the two choices, I would be a lightweight. I like to see light whipping and such but no blood or death. Love the peril type bondage as long as no one is hurt. Love reading the Gimp Forum, and what everyone has to offer.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 07:32:04 PM

    Name: Kevin

    Hi Gimpers

    It's been awhile since I posted, but I wanted to give my choice in this latest poll.

    I would have to go with Lightweight for myself, because although I'm all in favor of light pain and humiliation, I find no enjoyment in the girls death! I'm all in favor for things such as breathplay, light shocking, foot torture etc.

    But as far as major physical torture or death, I'm not for that at all.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 08:17:20 PM

    Name: YikYakker
    Homepage URL:

    GIMP POLL: In fairness to the question (and its author), we should take note that the poll does not ask which camp we identify with, but which way we lean. That assumes a spectrum, like the kind that SharedJoy developed. While the SharedJoy Scale has a midpoint - which is convenient for wishy-washy people such as myself - the GIMP pollster asks us to commit to one side or the other, even if faintly.

    On that basis, I would have to say that I am a LIGHTWEIGHT, in that I'm primarily interested in how the victim looks, not how she feels. That is to say, I don't really get off on the pain/injury/maiming as much as the actress' reaction to whatever situation she's in, as long as she's convincing, she's hot, she's in peril and she is losing some clothing in the process. Sweat and tears thrill me more than blood.

    But even this stance is problematical. For example, I love Jane von Detlefson's work. (Certainly I'm not alone in that). But she often sheds blood in her roles, as she does in Maleficarum. Still, as long as she's not a bloody mess, I can deal with it. I just don't want to see the girl disfigured or butchered. That's the kind of thing that takes away the erotic aspects of the scene, at least for me. It's one of the (many) problems I had with Blitzkrieg. Once the "leading lady" got her face rifle-butted, it was not longer enjoyable. And while the rape of Camille Keaton in ISOYG was incredible, the battered state they left her in was not to my liking.

    But then you have Raquel Merono in Dagon, who is cut in numerous areas of her body in order to draw blood that would lure the monster to her...but I didn't mind that at all because she was still hot, naked and convincing. Maybe it's because they left her face alone, I don't know. But that would make me a HEAVYWEIGHT on the SharedJoy Scale.

    Oh, I'm so confused...I'm having an identity crisis.

    Good thing it's all fantasy. ;)


    I tend to shy away from movies that would get a 7 on the SharedJoy Scale. But I saw one from Japan named Boy Eats Schoolgirl that so sickened me I decided not to review it. Among other things, it featured scat, vomit and a disemboweling (all involving young cute women). I'm pleased to say that the movie is out of print.


    John Galt In case I forgot, thanks for the nifty review of Hollow Man and once again, valuable information about purchasing the "right" version.

    Following what Nia said about psychological damage - and I'm not questioning the physical pain inflicted upon Rhona Mitra from being raped - I thought the aftermath scene, with Rhona sobbing on the bed, only slightly covered by her robe, was really hot. That vulnerability and sense of bewilderment, shock really shone through. I mean, can you imagine? "Hello, Mom? I'm really in bad shape, I just got raped by an invisible man!" It's gotta freak you out.

    Sort of like the girl who got raped by a tree in Evil Dead.


    Homepage URL: I know we've talked about Girl in the Dragon Tattoo on the board in the past. This article provides some interesting insights on the casting.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 08:33:11 PM

    Name: John Galt

    YikYakker: I read the comment by David Fincher, which I thought was borderline incomprehensible. I notice the article you linked to "translated" what he said into more understandable terms. I read the trilogy and saw the Swedish movies with Noomi Rapace. I liked the matter-of-fact nudity in the movies, and I thought the rape scene was excellent. I would have liked a bit more nudity but I didn't think Noomi Rapace was all that pretty so I didn't feel like I was missing out on anything. (Yes, I know that sounds terrible but you know what I mean.)

    It remains to be seen whether Fincher will have as much as or more nudity than the original, and how well he will handle the rape scene. But there's little question in my mind that casting a "name" actress would have insured less or no nudity and a greatly watered down rape scene. I like Scarlett Johansson but she would not have done the movie the way it was originally done. She has never done anything like that. Back in the day, Angelina Jolie might have done it properly, but I can't think of any other American actress who would even consider doing the rape scene right.

    I think Fincher made a good choice by casting a relative unknown. Now it just remains to be seen whether he does the few but significant GIMP aspects of the story any justice. I am not optimistic. (Which I'm sure comes as no surprise to regular readers of my posts.)

    Still, I read quotes from a Vogue interview in which Fincher did this:

    Then he double-clicks on something and realizes that it is a rape scene and hits the stop button. "I'm not going to show you that," he says. "That's too heavy to drop anybody into. You gotta get there!"

    And the interviewer says this:

    The scene is agonizing to watch as it slowly becomes apparent that he is going to sodomize her. Nothing is left to the imagination.

    And then we get this:

    "I saw this not as a blockbuster that appeals to everyone," says Fincher. "I saw this as an interesting, specific, pervy franchise. The only chance for something like Dragon Tattoo to be made in all of its perversions is to do it big."

    So who knows? All of that sounds very encouraging. Especially the pervy franchise part.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 09:34:08 PM

    Name: MAV
    Homepage URL:

    On the poll question, I guess I'm a heavyweight.

    I can accept a lightweight scenario if there is tight AOH bondage of a hottie in revealing clothing but it doesnt really do it for me unless the hottie is tortured in some way. I'm not an extreme heavyweight though, in that I dont like death, more than some scars of blood, or mutilation.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 10:27:03 PM

    Name: Fritz

    Poll: In an effort to help GIMPers who are having difficulty determining whether they fall in the light or heavyweight categories, I've created a handy crib-sheet which lets you assess some of the key characteristics which might affect how one responds to this crucially important question. As has been mentioned several times, these attributes are more scalar than distinct yes-no choices, but in the manner preferred by our dialectic leader, that's how they are presented here. As has been suggested, feel free to lean.

    Dry as a bone
    Pour it on
        Wounds and marks
    No thanks
    Scar her for life
        Permanent Damage
    Not even a scratch
    Skin her alive
    What a waste
    Waste her
    No problem
    You're kidding, right?
        Favorite term
    B & D
    Torture Porn
        Favorite film
    Story of O
    Bloodsucking Freaks
        Favorite producer
        Favorite toy
    Chain saw
    Light spanking
        Ideal partner
    Pony girl
    Captured terrorist
        Term for partner
    Tied to bed
    Nailed to cross
        The next day
    Breakfast & Blow job
    Body disposal

    I'm sure there are more, but that should be enough to assist those who are sitting on the fence. Of course, if you chose seven from each column, you're still boned. And that's why this isn't as straightforward as some short people would have us believe. Then again, in a world where all Republicans support the same principles and all Democrats agree on theirs, where all men like football and all women like pink, and where all dogs slobber and all cats puke, we in the GIMP community should be able to establish our own clear-cut boundaries.

    As for me, I've already been labeled, apparently being among the more extreme of my kind. And who am I to deny that? Still, I don't believe I'm as one-dimensional as claimed. Granted, I do lean toward all the choices in the heavyweight column, but there are critical GIMP elements which have little to do with the degree of violence inflicted - and these may affect our preferences. For instance, what about nudity? Graphic sex? Bondage? Whether or not these are present affects a scene's appeal for many of us, and may well trump the actual level of peril.

    Personally, I get little pleasure from a GIMP film that has no storyline. If the violence is completely random or presented with no context, even the most extreme scenes will disappoint me. In the same way, I'd much rather see a naked and bound damsel endure relatively light punishment than see a clothed, unrestrained victim ripped to pieces.

    Like I said, it's not that easy to force us into those pigeon holes.

    And in case I have not already been counted, make sure you add me to Team Heavy.

    Kevin wrote:

    I would have to go with Lightweight for myself, because although I'm all in favor of light pain and humiliation, I find no enjoyment in the girls death! I'm all in favor for things such as breathplay, light shocking, foot torture etc.

    It sounds like you are indeed a Lightweight. However, I would add that death is not a necessary criterion for a Heavyweight fantasy. In fact, there exists a whole slew of strange necro people who enjoy seeing women quickly shot, strangled, or otherwise dispatched... with no nudity, rape, bondage or torture. Where's the fun in that? It's also rumored that some fetishists (many believe they live in an isolated village in Belgium) think the fun starts after the victim is already dead. Oh the humanity! Where will it all end?

    YikYakker wrote:

    But then you have Raquel Merono in Dagon, who is cut in numerous areas of her body in order to draw blood that would lure the monster to her...but I didn't mind that at all because she was still hot, naked and convincing. Maybe it's because they left her face alone, I don't know.

    Any self-professed Lightweight GIMPer who enjoys Raquel's demise in Dagon is more than a little conflicted. First she's tortured almost to death, then she's suspended naked over a pit, and then... well, I don't want to spoil the ending. Oh what the hell... by the time that scene ends, all that's left of Raquel is a pair of hands! You need a face? It's gone, dude, just like the rest of her.

    And YikYakker also wrote:

    Oh, I'm so confused...I'm having an identity crisis.

    Join the club, buddy.

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 10:42:32 PM

    Name: Dangerous Dave

    All this discussion of Lightweight or Heavyweight can be summed up by one movie right now. That movie is "A Serbian Film". If you like it, you are most definitely a "heavyweight". Me I'm strictly "lightweight".

    So here is the quick synopsis of "A Serbian Film". A retired Male Porn star is lured back into the business to do an "arty porn" movie. He doesn't know what it's about, but he's offered big money to do it so he does. The scenes he has to do get weirder and weirder culminating in him being drugged up on animal viagra and he eventually commits murder many times over.

    A lot of crazy shit happens in this movie, but I want to focus on two GIMP scenes. In one, a woman is brought in naked and handcuffed spreadeagle face down on a bed. Our "Hero" then starts fucking her from behind and he is goaded into hitting her, which he does, violently bruising her back and ass, then he is handed a machete which he uses to more or less behead her while fucking her. It is then implied that her death causes her vagina to clench up, at least I think that was implied.

    The next GIMP scene: a woman is naked, on her knees with her arms tied overhead. She has had all of her teeth removed by pliers (not shown, just the bloody aftermath). A Naked man (not our hero) enters and begins to fuck her bloody mouth. While doing so he pinches her nostrils shut, thereby effectively strangling her.

    Neither of these scenes did I find particularly erotic, though a naked spreadeagle is always nice to see. But as I said in the beginning, this movie separates the "Heavies" from the "lightweights". It's one of those movies that have to be seen to be believed. Kind of like how "Martyrs" was a few years ago. I probably won't watch it again, but I can say now that I have. Anyone else out there seen it yet?

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 11:21:06 PM

    Name: Covers
    Homepage URL:

    I'm a Lightweight, though I'd redefine that as "I don't really want to see her permanently damaged." I'm fine with lots of pain and red stripes and the threat of death or mutilation, but I've always been one to take care of my toys. No army men and magnifying glasses in the sun for me. Hmmm...a magnifying glass and a girl staked out in the sun--now that's a torture I've never seen. ;-)

    All of the Stormrider art that we've seen is fine with me. As long as I can visualize the hanging girl as not quite dead and her rescue imminent, I'm good.

    I also prefer my victims to stay pretty, and I like to see their expressions. Some of the stuff I've seen from Insex involved too much distortion of the model's face for me to find it engaging. I usually find gags to be a negative since they hide a lot of expression.

    Anybody who's visited my web site could guess that my particular requirement is for bondage. Ropes, chains, stocks, or other infernal restraints are all good. The best rape scene ever filmed with an unrestrained victim? Yawn. Add some rope and now we're talking!

    Just to throw out a peace offering to the heavyweights out there, I recently came across a new comic book series with the title "Gore." It's from GG Studios, which is an Italian company, but the book is in English. Four issues out as of August 2011, with a weird (to me) mix of good girl art, bondage, and body parts being sliced off.

    Ralphus wrote: GIMP POLL:
    If you had to rate yourself as a GIMPer, where would you lean?
    A: Heavyweight - Nearly anything goes in my fantasies
    B. Lightweight - I don't really want to see her hurt

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 11:26:37 PM

    Name: bleumune
    E-mail address:

    Even after Fritz's handy matrix, I still reside firmly in the heavyweight corner, but only in fantasy. In Real Life, I can't stand the sight of blood, mine or anyone else's. So much for my sainted mother's hope that I would become a doctor (sigh).

    Wednesday, October 19th 2011 - 11:28:11 PM

    Name: mothbrad

    Every one of these pictures we're being blessed with is awesome. Please assume I'm posting that every day.

    As for the poll, I think I fit in with many others' opinion in saying that I don't quite fit either side, although when it comes to GIMPage itself, I'd be more on the heavy side. However, for me it's all about the way something is presented. Rick has had some fairly gruesome scenes in his movies, but I generally like them because he's coming from our perspective. On the other hand, in a drama where we are empathizing with a particular character, something as relatively mild as a slap might feel transgressively over the top.

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 12:56:50 AM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    YikYakker: I'm pleased to say that the movie is out of print.

    Not me. None of those things appeal to me, but why not let those who get off on them enjoy them. We're hardly a good group to say "Your fetish is icky!".

    From your previous posts, I don't think you meant it like that. But it came off kind of snobby.


    John Galt: he is going to sodomize her. Nothing is left to the imagination.

    I was rather surprised to find that Jennifer Connelly did a scene where she is forced (by economics more than force) to do a sex scene with another girl ("ass-to-ass with a double-headed dildo") in "Requiem for a Dream". There's no bondage but it's definitely non-consensual.


    bleumune: So much for my sainted mother's hope that I would become a doctor

    Do you know what they call a lawyer? A nice Jewish boy who can't stand the sight of blood. (When I was growing up, **every** Jewish boy was expected to be a doctor or a lawyer...)

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 04:19:56 AM

    Name: Flintstone

    I guess I'm a lightweight; I don't see the point in killing or maiming her. I want to keep her so I don't have to go out and find a replacement, from a fantasy standpoint, but in my fantasy, I also have a dungeon that only I know about.

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 09:22:45 AM

    Name: Baron von Folter
    E-mail address:

    bleumune: When I found that I couldn't stand the sight of blood I decided to become a Tree Surgeon and then I found I couldn't stand the sight of sap.

    As to Fritz's matrix: I (as I asumme many others) would have to chose some from coluum A and some from coluum B. More of my choices would be from coluum B.

    Friedrich, Baron von Folter

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 11:06:10 AM

    Name: YikYakker

    jhlipton: You are right on both counts. My comment about Boy Eats Schoolgirl being unavailable did come off as snobby, and no, I didn't mean it that way. Here's what I meant to say, and should have said:

    With a few exceptions, I generally do not review movies that a) I did not enjoy, and/or b) are no longer available for folks to obtain. I will review a movie that meets criterion a) if it is disgusting, disappointing or poorly done and I want to warn everyone about it. It was on that basis (disgusting) that I was considering doing a write-up of Boy Eats Schoolgirl.

    I was somewhat conflicted for the reason you mentioned - just because I didn't like it doesn't mean no one else will. I wanted to warn folks that although it contained some GIMP elements, those here who don't like gory, putrid stuff will probably want to avoid it. I was prepared to include in my post a link to a favorable review (the one that led me to watch the movie) for the sake of balance.

    That all became moot when Asian Cult Cinema - to best of my knowledge the only source for the DVD - ran out of copies and dropped it from their catalog. I was pleased, not because the material would be denied to others, but because I no longer had the burden of making a decision about whether to review it or not. In effect, the decision was made for me under criterion b).

    That's what I meant to say, and I thank you for giving me the opportunity to clear that up.

    BTW, I've tried to find that favorable review, but I've lost the link and a Google search turned up nothing. It was in a blog on a site about extreme movies.


    Fritz wrote: Any self-professed Lightweight GIMPer who enjoys Raquel's demise in Dagon is more than a little conflicted.

    Ain't it the truth. This scene falls under the category of "I-liked-it-up-until-they..." that emerged in our discussion about BATS.

    Dagon is a gripping movie that builds to a climax with the suspension over the monster pit scene. I was hoping that Raquel Merono's character would (eventually) be rescued - after we'd had a nice long opportunity to see her struggling, naked, and in peril.

    *spoiler ahead* When he brought her up the first time, she was covered in slime and begged him not to save her. That took a little bit of the sting out of seeing what remained of her the second time he raised her. Still didn't like it though. *end of spoiler*

    I'm not leaning, I'm tottering.


    We had a poster here once that was probably an extreme Lightweight. He was upset about some of the things we talked about and the movies we reviewed. It was clear that he preferred vanilla bondage.

    "Enough snuff!" he roared in his post. "What's wrong with a little bit of pinching or tickling?" (I'm paraphrasing because I'm too lazy to look it up on Search the GIMP). I posted a reply, something to the effect that perhaps he had stumbled onto the wrong site.

    And no, his moniker was not Bondage Dave, although it could have been him using a pseudonym.


    John Galt: Thanks for that link to the article about David Fincher and Mara Rooney. Notwithstanding her somewhat gaunt, model-like look, I think Mara is very attractive - almost like my ideal GIMPette with her ebony hair and blue eyes.

    If they're making her look grotesque, I probably won't see the movie. But I will read this article when I get the chance.

    That phrase, pervy franchise is intriguing, although I'm wondering if he meant to say pervy enterprise.

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 03:03:28 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Sorry, the correct title of that movie is Eat the Schoolgirls (US) or Eating Schoolgirls: The Osaka Telephone Club (original Japanese title).

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 03:19:48 PM

    Name: Sloth

    Man, it's been awhile since I saw a poll around here that did two things in concert - get this many responses and not have everyone at odds - well done me droogs.

    Stay well all

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 03:46:53 PM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    Here's where I stand on Fritz's chart:



    Dry as a bone
    Not too much
    Pour it on
        Wounds and marks
    No thanks
    Not too much
    Scar her for life
        Permanent Damage
    Not even a scratch
    Not too much
    Skin her alive
    What a waste
    Some live for a day; some for a month
    Waste her
    No problem
    You're kidding, right?
        Favorite term
    B & D
    Belly punch; garrote
    Torture Porn
        Favorite film
    Story of O
    Mainstream: Fatal Pulse; Fetish: Feathered Death and Crazy Family
    Bloodsucking Freaks
        Favorite producer
    PKF!!! (EWP for photosets)
        Favorite toy
    Chain saw
    Light spanking
        Ideal partner
    Pony girl
    Kidnapped Coed
    Captured terrorist
        Term for partner
    Tied to bed
    Tied to X-Frame
    Nailed to cross
        The next day
    Breakfast & Blow job
    Find more victims
    Body disposal
      Rape her?
    Fondle her at most
    4 or 5 guys at her mouth and pussy; cum-shots to the face; relatives (mothers and daughters or sisters) forced to rape each other
    All the holes, all time

    So, I'm more of a Heavyweight than a Lightweight.  But you all knew that.

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 04:23:32 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Fritz and jhlipton: This is a fine tool you've developed. Mind if I join in?



    Dry as a bone
    Maybe a little where the whip strikes
    Pour it on
    Wounds and marks
    No thanks
    Whip stripes
    Scar her for life
    Permanent Damage
    Not even a scratch
    Branded butt
    Skin her alive
    What a waste
    Not if she does what she's told
    Waste her
    No problem
    No way
    You're kidding, right?
    Favorite term
    B & D
    Torture Porn
    Favorite film
    Story of O
    TBD after Halloween
    Bloodsucking Freaks
    Favorite producer
    Jess Franco (at his best)
    Favorite toy
    Cat o'nine
    Chain saw
    Light spanking
    Clothes-ripping; groping
    Ideal partner
    Pony girl
    Smart-ass heiress
    Captured terrorist
    Term for partner
    Smart-ass bitch
    Tied to bed
    Chained AOH or racked
    Nailed to cross
    The next day
    Breakfast & Blow job
    still some vacant dungeon cells to fill
    Body disposal
    Rape her?
    Fondle her at most
    When she's conscious
    All the holes, all time

    Well, I guess I'm leaning towards

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 09:49:25 PM

    Name: John Galt

    YikYakker: I also like the looks of Mara Rooney. Fair warning, though, the character of Lisbeth Salander has lots of piercings and, of course, a huge dragon tattoo on her back. In case you hadn't seen the controversial teaser poster, featuring Mara Rooney's pierced nipple, go here to see it.

    * * * * *

    Well, before David Fincher's American version of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo is released in time for Christmas, 2011 and we find out whether or not he wimped out on the rape scene, I thought maybe I would do my standard GIMP Bits review of the Swedish version starring Noomi Rapace, who is coincidentally starring in the new Sherlock Holmes movie, which is also due out in time for Christmas, 2011. That's kind of a random coincidence. Anyway, this will give you some idea of how the rape scene was handled originally, so you can decide for yourself whether new one sucks or not.

    * * * * *

    The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (2009)

    This is a review of the original, Swedish version of the film starring Noomi Rapace as Lisbeth Salander, the androgynous goth-punk character with the titular dragon tattoo. This is the movie based on the first book in the late Steig Larsson's international best-selling trilogy, and the only one that really has any GIMP. The books are sensational, and the Swedish movies are all excellent as well.

    I will not go into any great detail concerning the plot, which is a fairly engaging murder mystery, and one of the best novel-to-movie translations I've seen. You can find any number of Real Reviews to tell you how awesome the movie is. I am going to concentrate on the two GIMP bits in the movie. The set-up is this: Lisbeth Salander is a ward of the state, and has to answer to a newly appointed guardian. He is a sleazy pervert who demands she turn all her earnings over to him and then he makes her perform sex acts on him whenever she wants any money.

    In the first GIMPish scene, Lisbeth's first meeting with the guy when she needs money, her state-appointed guardian tells her how it's going to be. He walks up behind her and slips his hand down inside the front of her shirt and plays with her breast.
    Feeling up Lisbeth
    Meanwhile, he is undoing his pants with the other hand. He forces her around to face him, takes hold of the back of her head, and forces her to fellate him.
    Making Lisbeth fellate him
    Lisbeth, not a woman to take this sort of thing passively, buys a small video recorder and hides it in her purse the next time she goes over, intending to get his sexual predation on video. Unfortunately, this time he gets violent. He takes her completely unaware when he viciously punches her in the face, knocking her onto the bed.
    Beating Lisbeth up
    While she is stunned, he jumps on her back, reaches into the drawer and removes handcuffs, and cuffs her wrists to the head of the bed. Then he forces a cloth into her mouth to gag her.
    Cuffing and gagging Lisbeth
    He walks away and Lisbeth jumps up, kicking and struggling to escape the bedframe. When he comes back he falls on her and loops a rope around her ankle, then pulls her leg straight down to the bottom of the bed and ties it there, forcing Lisbeth onto her stomach all while she struggles furiously.
    Tying Lisbeth to the bed
    He pulls off her panties. He takes off his pants and carefully folds them and hangs them up, all while Lisbeth is struggling and looking around behind her to see what he is doing.
    Stripping Lisbeth and getting ready to rape her
    He mounts her and brutally sodomizes her while she screams in pain.
    Sodomizing Lisbeth
    The scene ends in mid-thrust (and mid-scream) and the next thing we see is Lisbeth hobbling painfully home.

    The scene where Lisbeth gets revenge on this guy is extremely gratifying, and if this review was for "guys in merciless peril" I would take the time to describe it in detail, because it is sensational, brutal and totally cold-blooded. She did record her sodomy at his hands, and part of her revenge is making him watch it, so we hear parts of her rape as well during the scene.

    There is also a very brief scene about 1 hour and 16 minutes into the movie where a young woman is found dead, almost naked, and chained in a horse stall. Shortly after that we see a crime scene photo of a beheaded naked woman. And then again about 1 hour and 36 minutes in there are more crime scene photos of bound dead women.
    Unknown victim
    SUMMARY: Punk goth girl Lisbeth is intimidated, humiliated, felt up, and forced to fellate her state-appointed guardian. When she comes back next time, he punches her, knocking her onto the bed and stunning her. He handcuffs her to the bed, gags her with a cloth, ties her foot to the bottom of the bed, strips off her panties, then mounts her and brutally sodomizes her. There is also a blink-and-you-miss-it bondage murder crime scene. And some random Noomi Rapace nudity on three or four occasions, one during a sex scene.

    This is an excellent movie from start to finish. It has two GIMP-type scenes that are integral to the storyline. The first scene is uncomfortable and humiliating. The second scene, in which Lisbeth is brutally sodomized, is extremely well done. My only criticism from a GIMP point of view is that there is no real nudity. We see a flash of her butt from the side when her panties are ripped off, but that's it. Still, the scene is riveting and even without nudity I would grade it a solid B+. This movie is available from Amazon. This is the original Swedish movie with Noomi Rapace, not the 2011 American remake with Rooney Mara.

    Thursday, October 20th 2011 - 11:00:51 PM

    Name: esso
    E-mail address:

    John Galt: Nice review of Dragon Tattoo. I thought Noomi Rapace was perfect. I also thought the other two movies went downhill from here with "Hornet's Nest" basically unwatchable. I think if I hadn't read the book I would have been completely lost. It is hard for me to imagine Rooney Mara as Lisbeth - too beautiful - but we will see. NB-Rooney is the granddaughter of Art Rooney and Wellington Mara, both NFL team owners, hence her name. Also John, doesn't any coincidence have to be random?

    A note on Cows Pigs etc. I read this book at least 30 years ago. All I would add is the author makes the point that economic penalties would not have had enough strength which is why the ban on pork became a religious taboo. One fact he uses to back up his argument is that you can get become seriously diseased from eating undercooked beef as well but there is no such ban on cattle.

    Foot fetish: A physiological explanation for foot fetish is that the area of the brain that receives neural stimulation from the feet is smack up against the one that receives stimulation from the genitalia.

    Friday, October 21st 2011 - 04:29:19 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Picture of the Day: I'm guessing these three guys are trying to figure out how to divide up that girl among themselves. Another beautiful naked woman, Stormrider. I just wish I could see the look in her eyes. ;)

    I'm starting to dig the ponytail look, for this reason: In whipping scenarios, when you want to expose her back, you can flip her hair over to the front without covering up her breasts (at least, not both of them. These things are important, dammit!


    John Galt: While you're asleep, do elves come out and put together your reviews and caps for you? (That's a reference to an old Grimm's tale, in case anyone out there thinks I'm nuts).

    But seriously, thanks for quickly assembling an excellent review of the original Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Nice detailed scene descriptions and sharp caps too.

    That last picture definitely depicts a heavyweight situation.

    But ever since you used the phrase "punk goth girl" I can't expunge from my brain the tune "Punk Rock Girl" by the Dead Milkmen. Egads.

    BTW I made the mistake of calling the leading lady of the remake Mara Rooney, when in fact her name is Rooney Mara. I think she flipped her first name and last name around to mess with our minds.

    Just like Fox Megan did.


    Flintstone wrote: my fantasy, I also have a dungeon that only I know about.

    You and me both, buddy.


    esso wrote: A physiological explanation for foot fetish is that the area of the brain that receives neural stimulation from the feet is smack up against the one that receives stimulation from the genitalia.

    Well, that certainly adds weight to the argument, "But I was born this way!"


    Review coming up in a later post, folks. Stay tuned...

    Friday, October 21st 2011 - 08:17:05 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Poll update:

    Heavyweights - 12
    Lightweights - 11

    This excludes YikYakker, the wishy-washy one who can't come up with a definitive answer. Depending on what final answer he decides upon, we're either tied 12-12 or else the Heavyweights are up by 2. Either way, this has been a very close poll.

    BTW, I want to clarify, leaning towards the Heavyweight category does not necessarily mean you want to see the girl killed, only that your fantasies are not limited to where the girl may get marked up or hurt. You don't have to have the Death Fetish to be a Heavyweight.


    Anybody else wondering how the Maleficarum screening went with the execs on Wednesday? We're waiting to hear if they accepted the movie or banned it from playing in the theatre for the public. No word from Margot or Jane so far. Hmmmm....


    John Galt: It does amaze me how prolific you are when it comes to reviewing movies. It reminded me to check back in 2008 when you won your Ralphus Award for Most Prolific New Reviewer that you reviewed 58 movies and video clips in just over 4 months. I guess you're trying to break your own record?

    The link for your latest is in my Homepage URL above.


    Regarding the movie and also the Hollywood remake starring Rooney Mara, maybe I just don't get the appeal or understand the fuss. Okay, maybe it is a good movie and maybe the remake will be even better, or worse. The bottom line is it's already ruined from the start. Now I'll admit, the lead actress, Rooney Mara, is very attractive IN REAL LIFE. However, in the film, she's going to look like THIS. Guys, I couldn't care less about a rape scene if the victim is a freakgirl. And make no mistake, we have a major freakgirl thing going on. You might as well shave Rooney Mara's head like in that other film we discussed earlier. Are we that desperate for GIMP entertainment that we have to settle for the victim who looks like she belongs in a punk band?

    I say NO! And feel free to disagree with me, but just remember I'm always right.

    Friday, October 21st 2011 - 09:04:53 PM

    Name: John Galt

    YikYakker: You'll notice when I was replying to your post I typed "Mara Rooney" but at the end of the review I typed "Rooney Mara." That's what comes of having two last names. People get confused.

    * * * * *

    Ralphus: The character Lisbeth Salander has a definite look, and the reasons for it are carefully developed and revealed in the novels. She is absolutely not a girly girl and making her anything less than a pierced and tattooed goth punk "girl" would have been wrong. She is described as a young woman, but looking much more youthful--in fact, looking underage. My interpretation is that she is purposely trying to make herself unattractive because she has suffered at the hands of men who desired her and abused her as a child and a teen. Personally, I would resent it if they tried to soften her image, but I can sympathize with your preference to see her look prettier. I guess I am invested enough in the character that I will accept what she looks like during the rape scene.

    I'm still not a fan of piercings or tattoos. However, I did note that Noomi Rapace's Lisbeth did not have pierced nipples, but Rooney Mara's Lisbeth does. That's a little edgier, so maybe the movie's GIMP parts will be edgier as well.

    And yes, I am also wondering about the results of the Maleficarum screening, and I posted as much earlier in the week. I guess you haven't gotten any back-channel e-mails giving you the inside scoop, huh? Well, hopefully Jane or Margot will enlighten us all soon.

    Friday, October 21st 2011 - 09:41:20 PM

    Name: YikYakker the poll is about to close and I've got to get my vote in? OK, I'll use some logic here...

    Given the fact that my fantasy includes a dungeon with whips, a torture rack and a branding iron (in the shape of a double-Y, heh-heh), I would have to conclude that I am indeed a heavyweight, so that is my official vote.

    As a consolation prize to all you lightweights out there, I offer the following, long-overdue GIMP review.


    Kylie Jo Overhead


    Clip Length: 20 minutes

    Back in January of this year Steve Power introduced us to one of his up-and-cumming young ladies, Kylie Jo. I was captivated by her and picked out this work to, um, get to know her better.

    Then I fell so far behind in my reviews that by the time I got to this one, the product had already disappeared from the Powershotz catalog. However, her personal Powershotz portfolio includes 10 clips that are still available. So please consider this as not just a review of a particular clip, but also as a preview of the actress.

    No plot here, the whole purpose is to showcase Kylie Jo, completely naked in a continuous AOH position, while being tormented and abused by the Masked Man. She is not gagged. She is subjected to spanking, whipping, groping of her tits and pussy, and verbal abuse. The Masked Man cups his hand over her mouth and pushes her head backwards.

    The "Masked Man" likes what he sees and feels...

    He makes her turn in place while standing on her toes, and then makes her repeat the task after fastening two thin leather belts around her legs, one just above her knees and one around her ankles. Pretty tough to do.

    Kylie Jo is not having fun

    He then takes the rope that holds her wrist straps to the ceiling, connects it to the wall behind him, and pulls Kylie Jo up on her toes. This is followed by a whipping session, during which Kylie Jo again must turn in place so that the whipper doesn't miss any spots.

    A tug on the rope, a flick of the wrist...

    The camera lingers on Kylie Jo, leering at every inch of her from top to bottom and at a variety of angles. She begins to show weariness and pleads, "Please let me down." It's almost a question, as if she had doubts.

    "What are you going to do for me?"

    "Please, I'll do anything you want."

    ", I need more specifics. What specifically are you going to do for me if I let you down?"

    Long pause.

    "Do you remember how you got out of the gag?" he says, apparently alluding to a previous episode. "You had to beg me for something, what was it?"

    Another pause, and then she says, "Cock."

    "That's right, you had to suck my cock. So what are you going to do for me if I let you down?"

    After more taunting and coaching and hesitation, she resigns herself to what he wants her to say.

    Then she looks into the camera, which is now zooming in on her cute face and blue eyes, and says "Please master, if you let me down I'll suck your cock."

    I could have done without the "master" part, but otherwise it was like...schwing!

    Kylie Jo says the magic words.

    And that's how the clip ends. The actual cocksucking must be in the next episode.

    I've only seen a few Powershotz clips, but some commonalities have become evident:

    ~ There's a big to-do about showing each detail of the rope tying and securing. Maybe this is to assure the audience that the girl is being bound in real time, and that the bondage is credible. But in a short clip, I don't want to spend a lot of time viewing rope-work. Maybe others feel that's important.

    ~ There were a variety of camera angles, but some were acutely diagonal. On one hand, the technique works to obtain a close-up, full body view that makes use of the entire screen. At the same time, you've got to keep tilting your head to see and appreciate it. I had to rotate some of the caps 90 degrees to make them appear upright.

    ~ Split screen views appeared often, mixing small, narrow vertical shots with large, diagonal shots, as described above. I didn't mind the split-screen technique that much, but the combination of angles was tough for me to deal with.

    But this review is really about Kylie Jo. I liked this girl. She was not very vocal, except for the verbal exchange near the end. But she did a very good job of wordlessly conveying simmering nervousness, growing discomfort and frustration. To her credit, she stood on her toes for a long, continuous period of time. I'd like to see what she looks like tearing up or sweating.

    The action is mostly lightweight, but the clip works as a taste of Kylie Jo. I hope to see her again in more strenuous situations. Those who like their actresses slim and firm may want to pass on her; but I think she's ideal for those who prefer girls that are soft and curvy. If that's your dish, you can find more servings on her Powershotz page, priced between $5 and $20.
    My Grade: B-

    Friday, October 21st 2011 - 10:05:45 PM

    Name: John Galt

    YikYakker: Nice review of Kylie Jo Overhead. The vidcaps were good as well. How did you get that vertical orientation? Cropping or just showing one of the split screens?

    I prefer the more slender of Steve's victims--I mean, models--therefore I had given Kylie Jo a pass. I really liked the stretched-out AOH, though, so I was tempted.

    I had the same issue of crazy tilting camera angles in the last couple of clips I bought from Powershotz. I think I even commented on it. I hope it was an experimental thing and it is abandoned. I don't like rocking my head back and forth watching a video trying to keep the model upright.

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 01:30:31 AM

    Name: Bill K.

    Sorry to say my Matmos' "Racing the Rain" video post at You tube got deleted.

    Bill K.

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 02:08:00 AM

    Name: Falstaff

    Re: current poll - I won't be of any help - I would probably be regarded as a 'middle weight'. A lot of my preferences depend on the venue - a total fantasy such as ZFX I like extreme torture, short of mutilation, marks, blood are fine just leave the poor victims whole and intact. I also perfer them to escape or be rescued in the end - or merely left in captivity for further recreation. In real life venues such as the old Insex live shows, I was much more a lightweight - even if the model was really "into the scene" or the "lifestyle" I was uncomfortable and not at all "excited" by the more extreme scenes. My real life experiences tend to definitely be of the lightweight category, my fantasy experiences go more heavyweight. So, for the purpose of this poll I guess I would have to be considered a lightweight. I also am anxious to hear the results of the Red Feline screening.

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 03:02:55 AM

    Name: petelobo

    So the forced choice poll between two extremes has come out dead even, or darned near. What a surprise! Just from reading the comments of those who do post (and apparently most of the lurkers lurk on polls as well), it's clear that there are a few of us out on the "kill the bitch" end of the spectrum, and a few on the "please don't hurt her" end, but most of us are in the bell part of the curve.

    I love whipping (especially the front, Stormrider: that's where all the sensitive places are), and I like marks and welts and maybe even a trickle of blood. But beating the girl's face and breaking bones or doing something more than temporary damage to the skin is out for me. I love electro torture, make her jump and sing, and maybe even some burns. But electrocution is out.

    I think most of us would admit that over the years of pursuing images and playing out of our fantasies we've become desensitized, so that stuff I might not have been able to respond to 20 years ago is fine today. But I have not--and hope I will not--become so desensitized that murder becomes a turn on, no matter how it's done. (obligatory comment here that I'm not judging anyone else; to each his own, etc.) And I hope I will not become so desensitized that I like seeing children hurt or people traumatized (though I don't like the consensual "beat me, master" crap either).

    Bottom line, I like women. Especially grown-up, natural bodied (slim or curvy), bushy women. And when they are willing to explore a fantasy of power/powerlessness, pain/pleasure with me or for me, I like them even more. I want more of them in the world, not fewer. It appears that it is killing and seriously injuring which, in the end, separates the "heavyweights" from the "lightweights". I'm happily in the middle, apparently like most of us.

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 04:06:19 AM

    Name: MaX CoXXX
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:


    Check out my new crux scene Alexandria Caged & Crucified (Full)

    Starring Alexandria & David

    Alexandria has been caged for a long time. She is going through her daily routine, working out, peeing, sucking her captors cock, being fucked from behind & being feed, her only meal being her captors cum

    Today is a special day. David puts Alexandria on his "T" & lets her squirm for 18 minutes.

    Gimp fetish points. Submissive rape, girl in cage, pee, bondage, non consensual BJ, crux.

    There is a few different cuts of this video. The full non death version is up now at the link above. There is also the caged rape only version & the crux only version. The death version will be released some time next month.

    Export (the movie) update. shooting small bits for a trailer that will be up on the site when it's finished. I've been taking with a local guy who finds $ for movies & distributes them. Ralphus liked the script, so gimp has something good to look forward to.

    I am excited to see Maleficarum.

    Good Hunting

    MaX CoXXX

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 03:40:11 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Latest poll results:

    Heavyweights - 13
    Lightweights - 12

    And Petelobo says he likes women and is in the middle. That wasn't an option. Like I said, we're all in the middle. Be a shame if your side lost by one vote because someone didn't vote, or posted without stating his answer.


    YikYakker: Very nice review. Did you have to get permission from John Galt to review a Powershotz title? I thought he had exclusive rights.

    Kind of surprising that Steve Power pulled that clip from his site and no one can buy it based on your review. Kylie Jo is attractive, although once again, there's more of the same problems that have plagued other Powershotz productions, plus a new one, filming the action with crazy angles. I remember years ago, Dan Hawke got criticized for doing the same thing in his movies. I've stated it here time and again, but it bears repeating and hopefully someone will learn something. Anything technical like editing tricks, splits screens, weird angles, etc. end up drawing attention to themselves and away from the tied-up girl onscreen. In other words, keep your direction basic and just show us the girl. We don't want to see you direct, we want to see her suffer.

    The direct link for your latest review is in my Homepage URL above.


    Maleficarum update: Jane sent me an e-mail today. The Cinemateca postponed the screening until next week. They have a festival now or something, so they're short on staff. So we'll have to wait a few more days to see if they accept it for a theatrical run. She also started that movie will definitely be available for download on the 31st as scheduled. 9 more days, baby!

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 07:00:40 PM

    Name: Eda
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Heavyweight, as anyone who has read my stories will attest. But why couldn't you pick other terms to make the distinction? Like mild, moderate or extreme. Ignoring political correctness, I don't like being called a "heavyweight."

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 08:14:36 PM

    Name: Badger

    The polls are just closing where I live (no, I can not see Russia from my front porch.) Stormrider bought my vote with today's pic. Heavyweight it is.

    Part of my ambivalence comes from the fact that some of my favorite scenes in mainstream movies involve nothing more than well done sexual tension and/or intimidation -- a la "Dead Calm".

    But at the end of the day, give me a bit of suffering.

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 08:28:16 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Ralphus wrote: Did you have to get permission from John Galt to review a Powershotz title? I thought he had exclusive rights.

    Yeah, but he was cool with it. ;)


    John Galt wrote: YikYakker: Nice review of Kylie Jo Overhead. The vidcaps were good as well. How did you get that vertical orientation? Cropping or just showing one of the split screens?

    No cropping...I had thought of that, but it just wasn't feasible.

    The first pair of images in the review were straight up - no problems, just trimmed the background a bit.

    Same with the left image in the second pair, the one with Kylie's legs bound together. But the one on the right had to be rotated 90 degrees. I thought that one was pretty cool, with KJ looking up at her bound wrists.

    The next pair with the whipping scene were small vertical images that were part of two split-screen caps. I enlarged them, but I'm not that happy with them because they came out a little fuzzy.

    The two facial close-ups were both rotated. Even then, they came out slanted, but what can you do.

    As for slender girls, I also plan to do a review of Powershotz's Layne...Overhead Extension. I know you and I feel pretty much the same way about Layne's body type.


    Last night I watched the first few minutes of the TV show Supernatural. A woman is in a hair salon, underneath one of those helmet-like super hair dryer things. Suddenly, she's getting uncomfortably hot, she seems unable to get out of her chair, and nobody else at the salon can hear her cry out because they are in a separate room making noise of their own. Suddenly sparks fly out of the device and she goes limp. When the hairdresser goes to check on her, she is apparently so fried that the show does not allow us to see her face.

    My reason for bringing this up is that I'm seeing a lot more violence on prime-time TV than I remember seeing in the past. Because I'm too busy hunting down GIMPage, I don't watch much TV, so I guess I'm just not used to it. My perception is that, except for the sensual elements - nudity or scanty clothing, tight bondage - there is not much separating our stuff from what is shown on TV everyday. (I am of course, not speaking of rape or hardcore sex, but focusing on the torture/violence aspects) If we here have become de-sensitized to violence - and I'm not sure that is the case - what is happening to the "normal" people who regularly watch TV scenes like the one I just described?

    Readers of my posts - and I'm sure there must be two or three of you out there - know that I draw a hard distinction between media (fantasy) violence and real-life violence. I am very skeptical of the idea that fantasy violence either causes or increases the incidence of real-life violence.

    We jokingly refer to ourselves as sick fucks or perverts, but I don't think we are that much different from everyone else.

    We just have better fantasies. ;)

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 09:26:48 PM

    Name: Steve Power
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Fellow Gimps! Sorry for not stopping by more often. Getting away from the computer is the priority these days. Thanks for all the reviews and posts! Aubrie's definitely the hottest. She had actually never had anything up her ass including her own finger which was hard to believe but I believed her. She was super sensitive and don't think she'll be coming back for seconds. The tub abductions are hot. Got some head dunking coming with Dani and plan to do more. Like the head held under water nude body kicking look. Keep the suggestions coming we'll incorporate one or two and ignore the vast majority!!!!!!!!!

    If you say you are a gimp I'll double any order you place! Thanks Ralphus for hanging in there! Click on the url to watch 18 year old super hottie KylieJo take it up the ass. There was another anal virgin. Lot of chicks willing to do dildo that never had a guy these days. They don't see it as losing their virginity.

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 10:13:03 PM

    Name: Steve Power
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    With regard to the KylieJo overhead clip....that clip is still available. The name of the clip is KylieJo - Wetness Check and Whip.

    Click on the url up top for a bitch boppin.

    Saturday, October 22nd 2011 - 10:20:58 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Ralphus regarding Maleficarum download release on Oct.31 do you know if this download is formatted to be able to put on disk so I can watch it my big screen 65 inch TV like their Maleficarum mailed out DVD would? And what about the Maleficarum mail out DVD release date? Any news on that?

    Bill K.

    Sunday, October 23rd 2011 - 12:28:48 AM

    Name: Renzo Novatore

    re: the poll

    I'm not exactly sure where I stand...on one hand, I don't really enjoy watching scenes of women being murdered, or scenes involving blood, but on the other hand I love watching hardcore bondage sex. Women who get tied up and gagged tightly, and fucked by dominant men who pinch their nipples, pull their hair, spit on them, torture their pussies etc, generally just ram their pussies like he's trying to destroy them, and force women to perform fellatio until tears spill down their cheeks. I also like abduction-type fantasies, in which women are tied up against their will and taken somewhere (possibly for aforementioned hard bondage sex??) I guess I'm probably more on the harder side of the spectrum, but like I said, I don't really like some of the ultra-hard stuff.

    Sunday, October 23rd 2011 - 05:21:13 AM

    Name: John Galt

    Steve Power: I wondered when you were going to drop by to comment. I have the Kylie Jo anal violation clips--both with the glass rod and the full-length clip from which your plastic-cock-anal-sex teaser clip was taken. I was going to review them but I thought I would give Ralphus a break from another painful proctological procedure presentment so soon after my Aubrie review. Too bad Aubrie won't be back.

    You'll double the order for GIMPers, huh? Hmm. I might need to take a second look at your latest clips.

    * * * * *

    YikYakker: By the way, there is an Aubrie AOH clip as well, if you like the looks of her. She is not as, um, full-figured as Kylie Jo, but she's not all that slender, either. Also, I'm not sure she spends very long suspended. But there are pictures here. And Layne--mmm, Layne. What a hot young thing she is. Did you notice there is another AOH clip of her besides the one you mentioned? Layne Hanging Strict looks nice as well, if you want to see more AOH.

    Regarding your violence on TV observations: I do not watch all that much TV, but it seems to me that the various CSI and SVU and similar procedural shows are extremely gruesome in their crime depictions. I think we just like our violence seasoned with some sex and nudity, which seems a lot more healthy to me, personally. But what do I know. I'm a GIMper.

    * * * * *

    In my travels through my DVD collection, I came across yet another notable GIMP movie that is not in the database, Blind Date. The movie itself is surprisingly obscure, and probably most folks think of the deplorable Bruce Willis-Kim Basinger "comedy" when they hear the title. This flick impressed me because (a) it featured a young, hot, slender Kirstie Alley in her only nude scene, (b) it featured a very young-looking Lana Clarkson nude, in underwear, and in bikinis, (c) it featured Star Trek: The Next Generation's Marina Sirtis nude and being murdered (prior to her rape in Death Wish 3), and (d) it featured three other pretty victims in various degrees of nudity. What's not to like?

    * * * * *

    Blind Date (1984)

    This is an obscure gem of a GIMP flick starring Kirstie Alley (when she was young, slim and hot), Lana Clarkson (early in her career, after Deathstalker but before Barbarian Queen), and Marina Sirtis (before she was raped in Death Wish 3 or voyaged on the Enterprise). Sadly, only Marina Sirtis has a GIMP scene, although Kirstie and Lana both have nude scenes. Plus, there are other GIMP victims played by lesser-known actresses.

    The plot, in brief, concerns a serial killer (the Scalpel Killer) who cuts open his victims' chest with a scalpel, after he draws lines first. There's more to the story, but I can't go into much more detail without having to explain it all, so I will just skip to the GIMP bits, with a couple of notable nude scenes thrown in just because.

    The movie begins with ominous music as we follow Antigone Amanitou (billed as "First Victim") into her apartment. She takes the obligatory shower, but hears something and wraps a towel around her still-damp body to investigate. She is grabbed from behind and chloroformed.
    First victim
    When next we see her, she is unconscious on her bed. The Scalpel Killer straps her arms to her sides and draws some lines down her chest between her small breasts (but she has nice large nipples). He revives her with an oxygen bottle. As she comes to, her eyes track the scalpel on its way to cutting open her chest. Black out.
    First victim
    Next we see a young, slender and hot Kirstie Alley wearing a blouse open down the front to her navel. (She must like blouses open all the way down the front because she wears another one later in the movie.) She makes arrangements to meet the protagonist at his apartment later for some birthday sex. And then we get some brief Kirstie Alley nudity during the birthday sex.
    Kirstie Alley nude
    Next we see Marina Sirtis, obviously a hooker, on the street. The Scalpel Killer picks her up and they go back to her apartment. We see all of this from the murderer's point of view because we would recognize him if we saw him.
    Marina Sirtis the hooker
    He follows Marina Sirtis into her apartment. She freshens up and strips to her panties. She sits on her bed. The murderer ties her wrists together with a scarf, which she allows because she figures he's a kinky john (or a GIMPer). She gets a little confused and maybe concerned when he draws a line down her chest between her naked breasts.
    Marina Sirtis topless and bound
    She panics and screams when she sees the scalpel headed for her. Black out.
    Marina Sirtis freaks out
    The protagonist (who is not the murderer, by the way, which is obvious early on so that's not much of a spoiler) has a very, very brief flashback to his girlfriend getting attacked and raped.
    Brief flashback attack and rape
    Our next pretty victim (Kathy Hill) goes home with her boyfriend. She takes the obligatory shower. They have sex. He gets up to go to the bathroom and the Scalpel Killer cuts his throat.
    Another victim showers
    The murderer walks into the bedroom, rolls the girl over on her back, pins her arms above her head, draws on her chest and then we black out before the scalpel does its work.
    Another victims bites the dust
    The protagonist follows Lana Clarkson home, where she also takes an obligatory shower (although, alas, we don't see her wet naked body), then takes some sleeping pills and goes to bed. The protagonist sits next to her bed and watches her sleep. (Kind of kinky, huh?) She sleeps in the nude and rolls over to give us a look at her breasts. Mmm. Lana Clarkson breasts.
    Lana Clarkson breasts
    We have one more attractive victim (Noelle Simpson) who is followed home. She undresses and takes a bath. The killer surprises her in the bath but the scene ends with her surprised look. No nudity and no murder that we see.
    Bath victim
    The final bit features Lana Clarkson in a bikini kind of being stalked at an indoor pool but not really. There's some suspense, but no GIMP.

    SUMMARY: The first victim showers, is chloroformed, gets strapped to her bed topless, has a line drawn down her naked chest, gets revived and then the scene ends immediately before she is cut open by the killer. Marina Sirtis is picked up by the killer, goes back to her place, strips down to her panties, lays on her bed, has her wrists tied to the headboard, has a line drawn down her chest and then the scene ends immediately before she is cut open. A girl is attacked and raped in an extremely brief flashback. The next victim is home with her boyfriend, she showers, they have sex, he gets killed when he goes to the bathroom, the killer surprises her in bed, hand gags her, pins her arms over her head, draws his line and then the scene ends once again. The last victim is surprised in the bath but we don't get to see anything. In between, we get nude Kirstie Alley and nude Lana Clarkson.

    Well, there are a lot of attractive naked victims in this movie, some good stalking, and great lead-up to being murdered by having their chests sliced open with a scalpel. But we never see an actual female murder, although there is very brief blood when the boyfriend's throat is cut. So the action always stops in every instance before the pay-off. That is a bit frustrating. On the plus side, one of the victims is Marina Sirtis and she's wearing only panties and is tied to the bed. This is also Kirstie Alley's only nude scene, and it is one of Lana Clarkson's early nude scenes.

    For the great stalking and pre-murder activity involving several attractive nude victims, I'll give this a C+ grade.

    Amazon links to other vendors who sell this for $33.94 new, or $11.12 used. What a load of crap. I'm sure it can be had cheaper but my initial half-hearted search did not turn up any alternatives. I found mine in a bargain bin years ago. It is packaged as part of The Nico Mastorakis Collection and says it is the "Director's Cut." I saw this for the first time on The Movie Channel, or Showtime. or Cinemax, way, way back, and I am pretty sure the Marina Sirtis scene was complete. So I'm not sure what the "Director's Cut" includes, but it does not seem to exclude any of the good GIMP scenes, or any of the nude scenes.

    Sunday, October 23rd 2011 - 11:32:07 AM

    Name: A Canadian

    John Galt and YikYakker: I haven't been able to check in much over the last few days -- and I'm about to go MIA again for a few days -- but I wanted to post a short note to thank you for the reviews.

    Even with a full review and caps, I'm still torn on The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Blind Date appeals to me a bit more, although it seems to focus more on titillation than actual GIMP moments.

    Sunday, October 23rd 2011 - 11:52:27 AM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Bill K: I can say with upmost certainty that if you download Maleficarum you should be able to burn it to disk and watch it on your television. I recently tried it myself with another movie off Red Feline's download site and it worked just fine. No special software is needed. As for the DVD, Jane or Margot will post soon with more information as to when it will be out.

    Are you sure you didn't mention you have a 65-inch TV just to brag to the board about it? Hey, size isn't everything :)

    After years of putting it off, I just bought a 40-inch HD LED TV and a Blu-Ray this past week, since I want to see the movie in all its widescreen glory and with as sharp a picture as possible. It also helps that the World Series started this week, giving me a little extra incentive. I have to say, the difference is incredible over what I had before.


    Steve Power: Good to see you back in these parts. And thanks for clearing up the reason as to why the Kylie Jo clip isn't available on your site anymore. A simple case of giving it a new title is what caused the confusion. I've now made the necessary changes on YikYakker's review.


    John Galt: Thanks for another fine, picture-packed review. Your illustrated reviews give us exactly the reasons to check out a movie, or in this case, skip it. I saw Blind Date years ago on VHS. I mostly thought it was a waste of time. I love nude women, but you have to come up with better things to do with them than just slicing them up. The one bondage scene with Marina Sirtis was at least worth a look for those of us like me who thought she was the hottest Star Trek crew member of all time.

    The direct link for your review is in my Homepage URL above.


    The flash graphic banner at the top of the site: I guess the reason nobody has mentioned it is because they're trying to be polite :) Apparently Scribbler decided to get all avant-garde with his creation, hence the reason it's all in a state of higgledy piggledy ("Higgledy piggledy" means "a real mess"). What, you guys don't appreciate modern art? We have our own Picasso on the site. It's either his own artistic statement on the moral decay of the universe, or else he accidentally spilled a can of pop on his keyboard.

    Sunday, October 23rd 2011 - 03:10:22 PM

    Name: Scribbler

    The GIMP celebrating flash graphic redo is my contribution to the crazy angles discussion by John Galt and YikYakker and Ralphus. Yes, I'm not a fan of dutch tilts either (aka dutch angles) when greatly overused, as in used too much, or when at too much of an angle. Dutch tilts have been around forever, but good directors know how and when to use them, and bad directors don't.

    And I threw in some split screens cause those suck too (most of the time). Although I guess mine looks more like PIP!

    Sunday, October 23rd 2011 - 07:51:25 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Thanks Ralphus that's great news that I can watch the Maleficarum download on my big screen TV and I am sorry :( I did not mean to brag for I thought everyone :) had a big screen TV by now. Your "Burn Baby Burn" videos are terrific viewing, especially the Jacqueline Lovell (Head of the Family) BATS scene :) on my 65 inch ( OK I confess I'm bragging) big screen. Can't wait to see Maleficarum on it.

    Bill K.

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 01:28:16 AM

    Name: fodoralbra
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Does anyone know the movie "Dynamite and Green Silk"? A woman tied to a post is bullwhipped from the front by a lady wearing a green gown. I saw the movie many years ago in television.

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 08:37:43 AM

    Name: Pavel
    E-mail address:

    BlueDog wrote on Tuesday, October 11th:

    Finally, as a whipping fan, I'm pretty happy with the clips found here ( I think they are made by the paingate folks, but they are pretty high quality, good lighting, hot girls on the cheap. Check it out.

    Thank you BlueDog for the recommendation. But it does not seem to me that those clips are not produced by Paingate. Some models are the same, particularly amazingly real masochists like Alex and Candy, who definitely seem to enjoy the pain under the whip. But the quality of the production is significantly different: more dynamic and esthetic and exciting.

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 08:49:37 AM

    Name: Pippin
    E-mail address:

    I found this clip, which uses a lot of the usual suspects from a couple of cool JAV films, but it is definitely more sadistic than most.

    Does anyone know where to get the whole video?

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 05:16:55 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Scribbler wrote: The GIMP celebrating flash graphic redo is my contribution to the crazy angles discussion by John Galt and YikYakker and Ralphus.

    Thank goodness. When I first saw that, I thought maybe watching that Powershotz flick affected my eyesight!


    Steve Power: Thanks for clearing up the mystery of the non-disappearance of Kylie Jo Overhead. I'm pleased that folks can get their hands on it - hate to write a review for a movie (or clip) that has become extinct.

    Ralphus: I appreciate your timely correction of my review.


    foleralbra wrote: Does anyone know the movie "Dynamite and Green Silk"?

    Is this your movie? It's called Dynamite in Green Silk (1968) aka Death and Diamonds. A reviewer wrote:

    To top things off there is a whipping scene in an industrial setting as Mabel (Marlies Drager) lets Lana (Silvie Solar) feel the lick of her lash. This actually sounds better than it turns out to be but it is another fun element in a film that doesn't intend to be an exploitation piece.

    Sounds like the review might have been written by a GIMPer.

    At the very least, it seems to deserve a mention in our whipping scene database.


    Speaking of movies: I found this description of a scene from a movie that does not appear in our review database called Hell's Gate) (aka Bad Karma):

    There's an actress that ...strips as she's changing clothes inside a gas station. She's then kidnapped by the peeping tom gas attendant. The attendant takes her to a secluded house, strips her completely naked and ties her to an iron bed frame with electric wires attached to her wrists and shocks her. She's electro-tortured while tied in the bed...

    Maybe it's in the electro database. Has anyone seen it?


    John Galt: I'm glad you reminded us about Blind Date. I saw this in the theater when it first came out but haven't seen it since. Quite a few Hollywood hotties in their youthful prime. I'd like to try and look this one up again just, you know, for old time's sake.

    I feel such a sense of relief now that our countdown to Maleficarum is down to one week.

    Remember those old USO shows for the troops, the ones that would trot out a Playmate or some other hot celebrity babe while Bob Hope (I know, I'm really dating myself) would say, "Remember boys, this is what you're fighting for!"? This would be followed by a lot of hooting and hollering from the crowd.

    Well, I'm a GIMPer, not a fighter, and this is the hottie I want to hoot and holler for!

    And her sidekick Mila, too!

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 06:35:45 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    I just got a notification in my mailbox that the remake of the GIMP classic Mother's Day just came out today on DVD and Blu-Ray. From the trailers I've seen and a few clips, it looks like the filmmakers took a serious approach to the subject matter, which might actually be a good thing, since the first one was played for laughs. Instead of a horror comedy, this one looks like straight horror. I saw no indication of the great rape scene from the first movie where Deborah Luce is thrown on the ground and attacked by one of the brothers ("Bitch!" *slap* "Bitch!" *slap* "Bitch!" *slap*) while the other one takes pictures and the mother smiles broadly. In fact, this looks totally different in terms of what happens to the female characters.

    It does appear to have at least one sadistic scene where a couple of bound and gagged babes get doused with a flammable liquid and face fire torture, at least that's the implication from the trailer. Check out these stills:

    And if I want to see this one, looks like I'll have to rent it from some local video store, since (surprise!) Netflix continues their "business decision" to be censoring bastards and won't carry it. Gosh, I'm so totally shocked.


    YikYakker wrote (about Hell's Gate:)

    Maybe it's in the electro database. Has anyone seen it?

    I've seen it; it's a great scene. Hank Hobbs has several hi-res caps and a video link here.

    I mentioned this story before but it bears repeating. I found out about this movie from Brian's Page. When it came out, people were making a big deal about it because Amy Locane is in it and she gets gagged. Now, I like Amy Locane so I rented it. Turns out Locane's scene was dull. She's gagged but it's extremely brief and really not even worth watching. And yet there's this incredible scene with a fully naked beautiful blonde who gets tortured with electric shocks and nobody said a thing about it. I guess Brian's Pagers don't think torture is worth mentioning, they only care if there's a gag. I guess that's one difference between our site and theirs.

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 08:07:03 PM

    Name: Sung

    The Asian Gimp needed to be locked-down. Some solitary confinement is in order:

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 09:41:44 PM

    Name: MAV
    Homepage URL:

    For AOH GIMP lovers, and probably more for heavyweights, Seductive Studios just released my last custom.

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 11:05:24 PM

    Name: Stormrider

    Just wanted to stop by (while my internet still works) and say how much I'm looking forward to Maleficarum. Any word on DVD preorders yet? I'd really like to have the DVD to watch on my bigscreen... which is not as big as some around here.

    Thanks guys for the great reviews I've been reading here, especially John Galt's review of Blind Date. I've always had a thing for Marina Sirtis (ever since Star Trek...I'm such a nerd). Wish I'd known about this movie in the late 80's :)

    Oh yeah, the poll... I'm more of a heavyweight, myself.

    Monday, October 24th 2011 - 11:44:25 PM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    Yik Yakker: While you're asleep, do elves come out and put together your reviews and caps for you? (That's a reference to an old Grimm's tale, in case anyone out there thinks I'm nuts).

    Weren't those brownies? *I thought that story was kind of cobbled together...)

    Tuesday, October 25th 2011 - 05:06:17 AM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    MAV: The description of your custom ("Jenny is tied up and being interrogated. She is beat, punched, whipped and electrocuted") sounds pretty cool. What of the other girl tied with her - does she get some of the same? And how is the acting?

    Tuesday, October 25th 2011 - 10:09:21 AM

    Name: Simon

    Dear all: I'm so so so glad that the "Maleficarum" is going to released. Let's join the final countdown: 5, 4, 3, 2 ,1! and... Damn! Why the unit isn't "second" , can't wait to see it!

    Tuesday, October 25th 2011 - 11:38:40 AM

    Name: YikYakker

    MAV: That custom of yours looks pretty cool; I'm going to put that on my list.

    I have the same question as jhlipton - what have you got in store for the dark-haired one?


    fodoralbra: Hey man, sorry for misspelling your name in my post yesterday. Guess I can't see straight. Well, it's like they told me when I was a kid: If you keep doing that, you'll go blind.


    Sloth: I was reminded of that sci-fi book you mentioned - the one about execution of game show losers in the future - when I came across this clip of a game show on Brazil TV. Could we be inching our way toward that futuristic scenario? Or at least working some GIMPage in for higher ratings?

    Consider the foxy female contestant below. She wears handcuffs attached to a ring that is looped around a maze of steel pipe. The objective is to work her way through the maze, stopping to unscrew the valves that obstruct her progress. (The "steam" and green lights are evidently there to drive her crazy in the attempt.)

    Mmmm, blue jeans and a skimpy top - that adds a little bit of spice to the proceedings.

    She's really good at twisting knobs, isn't she?

    By George, she's done it! She must have a lot of experience being cuffed to plumbing fixtures.

    Tune in next time, when our bodacious brunette faces the Water Torture of Death!

    Tuesday, October 25th 2011 - 07:44:02 PM

    Name: sillyme
    E-mail address:

    Love Stormrider. So where can I see more of it? Web site? Book to buy? Would love to know more.

    Tuesday, October 25th 2011 - 09:20:52 PM

    Name: MAV
    Homepage URL:

    @YikYakker and jhlipton:

    The brunette is "Daphne", who I had star in the first 'part' of this custom scenario "Daphne Shower Torture" which you can also get at the NC store, or at She got pretty much the same heavyweight AOH GIMP treatment as Jenny which you can see, with the exception of getting whipped.

    I had Daphne make a brief AOH GIMP cameo to bridge the first 'part' to the 'sequel' with Jenny. I'll try to get her to post here. She's cool and active on DFN and twitter regarding all of seductivestudios' movies.

    Tuesday, October 25th 2011 - 10:28:54 PM

    Name: Badger

    Ralphus: Wow. Thanks for the heads up on Mothers Day. Being the big fan of home invasion that I am, I look forward to it.... or... to trying to find it.

    From the trailer, it barely looks like the first ... or other... Mothers Day which I have always considered to be my favorite "fun while it lasted but could have been so much more" movie. And the Mother certainly is an improvement. Rebecca DeMornay has come a long way from Risky Business and is looking rather comely. I see from the Plot Keywords on IMDB that there is only an Attempted Rape. But there is also a Forced to Strip, which would make it worthwhile for me.

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 09:40:48 AM

    Name: JoeX

    So about half of us seem to like severe torture, blood and/or death as part of our GIMP fantasies and about half of us don't. I'd ask for an exact count, but the poll has gotten a little bit muddled, in my opinion.

    The term lightweight is imprecise and pejorative (unless you are a woman, as Eda pointed out, then heavyweight can be seen as pejorative). But that wasn't a big problem as long as we knew what we meant.

    But now we've got jhlipton and YikYakker claiming that the lightweight position on rape is "fondle, at most" That was probably meant as a joke, but it has confused things to the point that Renzo says he is a heavyweight and then adds that he doesn't like blood or death. Wait, what?

    Joe X

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 03:35:25 PM

    Name: Greg
    Homepage URL:

    Just wanted to share this with some like minded people.

    I'm sure you all know how it is. There's a film you really want to see, sure its packed full of the kind of crap you love to watch and so it was with me and Flavia the Heretic. I was sure this was a film made for me. Nuns, flagellation, the whole deal.

    Oh dear, what a letdown. A film made well enough I have to say, but that wasn't my raison d'etre for wanting this film. I wanted to see plenty of nudity with a welter of sweaty floggings thrown in.

    Flavia does get whipped and what a flop. We see nothing, the back of her dress is ripped down and that's it. They don't even tie her to a post, she's kneeling against a pole or something.

    The sounds are good and I like the way the two young noviates stand by the door and look on with interest. I too would have stayed to watch had I been there, but on a gimp scale of 1-5 this just manages to scrape a 2 by virtue of the fact it is a flogging and the sound is cool. Here's the scene:

    We see a torture scene too. Sorry, there's no payoff here either. Firstly its not the prettiest nun in the convent and all the straps used to hold her down do nothing except hide what we all want to see. Why use all that paraphernalia just to keep her on the bench? What crap. We could have had a mouth watering racking scene here, complete with nudity, with a sweating, moaning victim and a creaking old rack, but no. They get to pour something hot on her is all. Then they cut off her nipple but it's totally uninspiring and a real letdown.

    In the final reel, Flavia is tied to a tree and skinned alive. Sounds good? Er..sorry, no. Again all pretty short, long shots and besides, who wants to see a woman skinned unless it's with a whip?

    As a film, Flavia was not half bad and pretty well portrayed with a handsome if not pretty nun, but not so lovely that she belonged on the catwalk, not the convent halls, so that assisted in its believability. The film needs to be remade. There's even a crucifixion in here. It all needed beefing up with long, lingering shots and gratuitous torture concentrating on the bits I really wanted to see the film for.

    No, for me Flavia struggles overall to get 2 out of 5 and that is a grudging 2 with all sorts of caveats. I really would not recommend this for a true gimpster viewing, but then it hardly rates for an afternoon matinee with the family either. I guess it's pretty hard to decide when you really would sit down to watch this gobbler. As I said, it is a good film. I really wanted to see a very bad film.

    My grade: D

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 05:25:19 PM

    Name: A Canadian

    Greg: Thanks for the nice work on the review and caps of Flavia the Heretic. That sounds like a film for the heavyweights and perhaps not even for them. Somebody obviously missed the memo from head office about the right way to cast nuns.

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 06:24:53 PM

    Name: Dan

    Yik Yakker: What is the name of that Brazil TV clip you posted pics of? I'd love to see the clip itself!


    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 06:57:32 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Greg: Your excellent review of Flavia the Heretic confirms what I have long suspected: It is not "nunsploitation" at its finest and a must-have for any fans of 1970s Euro-sleaze, as the Amazon site claims. Sounds more like it's just grim and dreary. The flaying at the end, while instructive, is not what I'm looking for in movie. Thanks for the warning.


    JoeX: Whoa man...maybe you'd better switch to decaf.

    Your terms imprecise and pejorative aptly describe your post. If you're confused about something, just ask politely for a clarification. Someone will respond in kind.

    Ease up man, we're just trying to have a little fun here.

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 07:12:26 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Dan: Sorry, I missed your question because I was in the act of posting myself.

    The name of the show is "Boa Noite Brasil", and you can find clips from the show on YouTube by typing the title in the search box.

    I won't have time to post scenes from the Water Torture of Death (my term) tonight; I'll try to get them up tomorrow.

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 07:45:30 PM

    Name: JoeX

    YikYakker: I'm sorry if my post seemed intense. That wasn't at all how the post was intended, but that's communicating through the internet for you, I guess.

    Joe X

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 09:25:21 PM

    Name: John Galt

    Greg: Thanks for the Flavia the Heretic review. I'm not quite that "heavyweight." I think I will give that one a pass and I appreciate you taking one for the team.

    * * * * *

    MAV: Nice vidcaps of two very hot girls. Your customs sound more torture torture than sexual torture, but I really like the visuals. Thanks.

    * * * * *

    YikYakker: Those were also some nice vidcaps of that Brazilian TV show. I never think of south of the border as being a particularly GIMP-rich environment, despite the sometimes racy pics I see from telenovellas. Of course, we do have Brazil to thank for the eponymous waxing treatment, which I suppose could be considered a sort of torture although it is absolutely consensual so there's no thrill. Although it might be kind of cool to inflict that on someone involuntarily, as a prerequisite to sexual abuse. I do prefer a shaved crotch. Hmm.

    * * * * *

    Well, Hogtied put up a new video called The Dig, which is billed as "A BDSM Abduction Horror Feature film starring Cherry Torn, Rain DeGrey and Iona Grace." Now, when I think of horror, I think of pain and torture and by that I don't mean torture by Hitachi Magic Wand to achieve screaming forced orgasms and not pain as in obviously pushing the limits of a pain slut. And even though I should know better, I watched it to see if it delivered.

    * * * * *

    The Dig, Part 1 (A Hogtied Video Presentation, 2011)

    Yes, that's right. This is just Part 1. I was disappointed to read "To Be Continued" at the end of this 27-1/2 minute "feature film." There's no telling how many parts it will eventually have. They did a Cabo thing that was seemingly interminable, and then they did a sequel to it. But honestly, if you like Hogtied stuff, this was pretty good.

    It is easy to summarize the plot set up: Rain DeGrey is the lead paleontologist, with Iona Grace and Cherry Torn assisting her. They are out in the middle of nowhere. The skies are rumbling threateningly. They decide to dig at an indian burial ground because they aren't superstitious. I thought it was illegal myself, but what do I know. Anyway, they find large bird bones--larger than normal, maybe the largest ever seen. Then three guys in bird-like outfits swoop in and the BDSM abduction horror film begins.

    Let me just get this off my chest first. I saw those bird guys and the first thing I thought was, "Hey, it's the Winged Avenger!" from the old British Avengers TV show episode of the same name. Tell me I'm wrong. Below on the left, The Winged Avenger. Below on the right, the Hogtied video. The Winged Avenger has a red lining to his cape because he's British, and even British monsters have a bit more class, but other than that....
    The Winged AvengerHogtied
    There's a bit where the three girls flee through the forest, although the bird guys don't give chase so much as plod along behind them. Two of the girls take refuge in their tent. Really? Take refuge in a tent? The bird guys follow them in and the sides of the tent bulge and vibrate with signs of a fight. (I am rolling my eyes.) The third gal jumps into the truck, but one of the bird guys is sitting there waiting for her. It takes her a while to notice. Then, outside and from a distance, we see the truck rocking.

    Next we see Rain and Iona being marched naked through the forest.
    Marched through the forest
    Cherry is on her back bound against a log, naked, with her feet spread and in the air with a tree limb stuck in her pussy. That might have been cool in a brutal violation sort of way except it was a limb from a rubber tree, apparently, since it had a rubber dildo on the end of it.
    Cherry bound and spread
    Fade out and fade in on Iona hanging upside down from a tree limb. Cherry is marched up and you think maybe the bird guy is going to make her eat out Iona but the branches binding Cherry stick out too far so she can't get close enough. Iona is finger fucked and her pussy is slapped. Cherry is forced onto her knees to suck a bird guy's cock. Then Iona is forced to suck the bird guy's cock.
    Suspended and face fucked
    Meanwhile, Rain is being held under a waterfall, naked. That's about all I can say about that.
    Rain under the waterfall
    In the next scene, which is still outdoors, all three girls are on their knees, bound to short crosses made of thick tree branches. The bird guys take turns fucking them in the mouth, roughly, and going deep and holding their heads in place as they struggle to breathe. Or gag. They also whip their breasts and stomach, and use a switch on their breasts, stomach, and inner thighs.
    Bound to the short crosses
    To be continued.

    SUMMARY: Three female paleotologists excavate an indian burial mound and incur the wrath of three bird guys, who bind them, march them naked through the forest, tie one of them suspended upside down from a tree, tie another one under a waterfall, and tie the third one on her back to a log with her feet spread and in the air. Then they are all bound kneeing to short crosses and whipped, switched, and forced to fellate the bird guys.

    This is an impressive, professionally shot feature. The acting is minimal. I have a hard time believing Rain DeGrey is a paleontology professor, although the other two could conceivably be student interns. The bird guys just caw. The soundtrack consisted of moans and whines and cries. Honestly, I think it would have been better if the girls had been more vocal, asking why the bird guys were doing things to them, asking what the bird guys were, begging to be let go, crying hysterically--you know, at least nominally acting the part of three terrified girls. As it was, they just came across as three pain sluts enduring the pain. No terror, no humiliation, no confusion, no nothing that would have made me believe the scenario.

    Alas, there was no horror aspect to this at all. They were abducted and they were bound and they were punished. This did not live up to its billing as a horror film at all. This is just a very well done standard Hogtied video feature, with three more-or-less attractive women (who were all seriously tattooed, which explains the more-or-less qualification), shot on location outdoors. I was not able to suspend my disbelief enough to even pretend this was a non-consensual abduction and torture situation. So while it was a very well done feature, with some really nice bondage situations, as a GIMP flick I can only muster a lackluster C grade.

    You can download this from Hogtied for about $19.99. If you are a member you can download it as part of your membership.

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 10:29:42 PM

    Name: A Canadian

    John Galt: Great job on the review of The Dig, Part 1.

    I'm glad I read the text and didn't just look at the pictures, as the caps actually make the film look quite good. However, your comments about the acting, the bird guys, and some of the sillier plot elements make me less enthusiastic about this film. Never mind the short running length for a feature.

    Wednesday, October 26th 2011 - 10:57:11 PM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    JoeX: But now we've got jhlipton and YikYakker claiming that the lightweight position on rape is "fondle, at most"

    That was from Fritz' original chart, and I'm sure was meant as a joke.


    John Galt: Your customs sound more torture torture than sexual torture

    A young hottie getting beaten, whipped and electro-shocked? Sounds pretty erotic to me!

    They did a Cabo thing that was seemingly interminable

    Parts of that "Cabo thing" looked pretty awesome. I did a search on Hogtied for Cabo and found 3 separate series!

    I think it was the staking and stretching that impressed me most. 7 years later(!!!), I'm not quite as enthralled...

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 05:46:10 AM

    Name: John Galt

    jhlipton: Yeah, I didn't intend to denigrate the Cabo shoots, just make mention of the fact that they were all stretched out over a lengthy period of time. I'm more of an instant gratification kind of guy. Likewise, there is nothing wrong with The Dig--it is a very high-quality production of the standard Hogtied fare. It just didn't pass my test for "horror." Also, the players are not actresses and Kink's role-playing scenarios--while excellent in almost all other respects--generally fail to suspend my disbelief enough for me to see them as anything but BDSM performers. My suspicion is that filming a successfully realistic role-play production might be all the government morality police need to roll in on Kink. They are certainly walking a fine line, and they are very likely aware of it.

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 09:02:59 AM

    Name: Sloth

    Concerning today's Stormrider pic, seems to me I saw a demonstration of such a device on the "Machines of Malice" series - of course the damsel they used was fully clothed - pity - on a live chick in looked very uncomfortable - a rather passive device to break the will I suppose.

    YikYakker - perhaps the Brazilians are on the right track with their programming - can only hope I live to see the day.

    Mav - Daphne certainly looks appealing in those stills - thanks for that view.

    Ralphus - have been looking forward to the release of "Mother's Day" - this one appears to have none of the dark humor qualities of the original - but we knew they would simply have to insert dudes into the mix cutting down on the time spent on the ladies - another pity.

    Greg - I'm pretty much on board with your assessment of "Flavia" - the crucifixion scene had a pretty nice chick as the victim but such a woefully short glimpse - and Florinda had her chance at Gimp film immortality in "The Last Valley" with a BATS scene but so poorly done it fell flat - yet another pity.

    John Galt - I think I'd find the suspension/kneeling combo scene very appealing but yeah, the bird man thing leaves me somewhat disconcerted - still, the chicks are attractive and it does seem to have very decent bondage - thanks for the info.

    Stay well all

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 10:08:47 AM

    Name: esso
    E-mail address:

    Since MAV did not answer the second part of jhlipton's question...the acting in the custom video was abysmal, unless you prefer girls who squeak instead of scream and an interrogator who pulls his punches to a ridiculous degree. Too bad, the set up was enough to get me to waste the money. The stills are a lot cooler. You at least can use your imagination.

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 11:21:51 AM

    Name: Dan Hawke
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Hey Gimpers:

    Ralphus and I exchanged some messages on FB a while ago and he suggested some of what I said would be of interest to the guys on this forum. So here it is...

    I think the golden age of the Internet is drawing closed. No one spends money anymore on memberships or vids. If they do they spend it at all they spend it on Kink, Hardtied or DungeonCorp sites. The golden age was powerd by just plain folks able to get into the bondage biz... Now it has all shaken out and the landscape is largely owned by the same monolithic types of enterprises that use to rule adult magazine/video distribution networks. So many little guys are gone - never to be seen again.

    Kink's product is really excellent, as is Hardtied and Dungeoncorp's, but when all mom & pop sites are gone, will their motivation to excel remain. Once you dominate the marketplace you pull all the strings; and you can stop worrying about quality.

    On a shameful promotional note, my video sales site Bound & Delivered has been completely revamped. I am no longer going to sell "burned DVD's". I have way too many problems with quality. I will now offer those titles for download. I am slowly prepping them all for availability.

    I am still selling my stock of "glass mastered" DVD's (the kind with a mirror finish, like Hollywood DVD's you would buy at Walmart or Target). However when the stock is gone so are these titles on DVD. I will then offer those for download only. To help motivate customers, you can select four Hawke DVD's for only $50, or nine for $100. Make sure to read the instructions carefully and be sure to only select titles available on DVD.

    Okay, that's my shameless plug.


    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 04:29:46 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Stormrider:: I meant to comment on this image yesterday. I really like the atmospheric features of this work: the oversized full moon, the silhouette of the dragon, and that strange-looking curvy-spiky thing that the girl is attached too. What is that? It seems like I've seen it before - perhaps in one of your other art pieces, or perhaps in this one and my memory is hazy. Can you fill us in?


    Ralphus: Thanks for:

    ~ That Hank Hobbs link to Hell's Gate pics and clip. Guess now that I have the best part of the movie, I don't need to see the movie. ;) Actually, I might check it out anyway, if it's a good story. I'll just put it at the end of the list with the other 300 movies I have to see.
    ~ The info about Mother's Day. This is another one I've never seen. But I guess it would be necessary to find an uncut copy?


    John Galt: Those caps for The Dig, Part 1 promise a great story; too bad it didn't deliver for you. But thanks for checking into it.

    It's been my impression that many folks who set out to make GIMPage flicks don't really understand how tricky it is to pull off horror and sci-fi. Making the audience suspend disbelief is much more critical in these genres, IMO.

    But jhlipton wrote: My suspicion is that filming a successfully realistic role-play production might be all the government morality police need to roll in on Kink. They are certainly walking a fine line, and they are very likely aware of it.

    Well, that sounds ominous. So then, producers have to try not to engage their audience and give them what they want, for fear of retribution? That really sucks.


    Sloth wrote: ...perhaps the Brazilians are on the right track with their programming - can only hope I live to see the day.

    Me too. Check this out:

    When we last saw our buxom Brazilian beauty, she had just succeeded in extracting herself from the Maze of Doom. In the next contest, she and her male competitor are sealed inside transparent cylinders and quizzed. Each time a contestant fails to provide the correct answer, the cylinder is flooded with water until it reaches the next level.

    Wow, any shorter and that dress would be a belt. Doesn't she look like someone who should be gracing the cover of Smooth Girl magazine? She seems to be struggling with a particularly tough question. Oops! Wrong Answer!

    Now she's thinking: Damn! I'm standing in water up to my knees, I'm soaking wet, everyone in the country is looking up my skirt, and I have no idea what this lecherous, middle-aged man is asking me about.

    If I can just find the remote, I'll fast-forward a bit. Ah, there it is...

    Good lord, this girl hasn't gotten anything correct. Good thing she's got some built-in floatation devices.

    Just think how much more entertaining this would be if she were bound hand and foot...attached to a weight...and wearing a bikini...or wearing nothing.

    Really, they should hire a GIMPer as a consultant on this show.

    Addendum: The girl's name is Fabiana Andrade - I like that, very poetic - and he she has been on magazine covers. In fact, she's all over the Internet.

    So I guess she's a celebrity contestant.


    JoeX: OK, we're good.

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 06:44:03 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Poll update:

    Heavyweights - 17
    Lightweights - 12

    We're about wrapping this one up. Yeah, I know the qualifications are a bit muddled, as Joe X said, but it really wasn't meant to be an exact science, just a way to gauge how people feel about certain things. I used the terms "lightweight" and "heavyweight", since Scribbler described himself as the former and I wanted to establish a distinction between the two. Based on the results and the comments, it's pretty obvious we're all somewhere in the middle. But 29-0 in favor of "In the Middle" wouldn't have been quite as interesting as the way I structured it.


    Greg: Very nice review on Flavia the Heretic, great job. I haven't sat down and watched the film from start to finish, but the nipple torture scene with the nun and the skinning scene at the end were the 2 scenes I kept in my highlights tape. Certainly could have been a lot better. The problem with most "serious" films about subject matter that has the potential to be sleazy or salacious is that they tone down the GIMP elements so as not to appear as exploitative. They fail to realize that the audience for a movie like this wants to see the good stuff. That's why I'm hoping that Maleficarum turns out to be an exception to the rule. We'll find out soon enough.

    The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above. And congratulations, I believe this is your first official review, so you get paid double for that.


    John Galt: You are always good for telling us what's new on the bondage sites that I rarely check out. On the link to that new Hogtied movie is a teaser where they let us watch the first 6 minutes of the film for free. I have to applaud Hogtied for doing something ambitious; it's really refreshing to see a company attempt to stretch and give us something new and different. The birdmen concept doesn't do a lot for me, but then I've never been big on villains in masks who don't say anything. Rick from ZFX used silent masked men in his films from time to time, but in his best work, he has bad guys who taunt and laugh at the girls and those have always been more effective, IMO. I guess I just put myself in the role of the villain and can't really identify with being a giant bird.

    Sorry to hear about the heavily tattooed victims, too, that's a deal-killer for me right away. Although the caps you choose don't really show any tats, so I'm glad you pointed that part out. Once again, it all goes back to casting. There are some nice-looking bondage models out there, we just need to find a producer willing to do the right things to them. At least the birdmen aren't wielding Hitachi vibrators this time. Maybe in the sequel.

    Here's your link:


    Dan Hawke: Good to see you back here. I have to agree with you about the Golden Age of the Internet drawing to a close. Although there's more choices now than ever, it does seem like most of them are from the cookie-cutter, most of which is well-made but consensual, which wipes away most of my interest. How I would love to see more companies following the ZFX mode instead, where you have non-consensual fantasy stories with wholesome-looking girls.

    Of the offerings out there now, PKF probably comes to closest, but from I hear, John Marshall is releasing far fewer movies featuring brutality, torture and rape, and a lot more with scads of near-sighted schoolgirls being mowed down by gun-toting psychos. Hey, he makes what he likes, and that's what sells for him.

    I really just need to find my own girls and make my own movies. At least I know what I like to see. In fact, I'll play the villain, I just need somebody to run camera while I do all these unmentionable things to them...

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 06:57:36 PM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    Lightweights are people, too. Here's a review/pictorial for those of us who aren't so keen on seeing women skinned alive.

    Title: Undercover Investigator of Perverts on a Bus (DV-1302)

    Starring: Yuma Asami

    Produced by: Alice Japan

    Running time: Two hours

    It's easy to see why Yuma Asami is a JAV superstar. She's remarkably cute, with a great body and spectacular, natural breasts. And she's a strong actress. She's so hot that any guy who saw her on a bus would immediately have impure thoughts.

    And that's exactly what happens. As this film's title (Undercover Investigator of Perverts on a Bus) makes clear, Yuma plays an undercover cop who takes bus rides to lure perverts.

    The movie's first two scenes are strictly for entrapment enthusiasts. In the first, Yuma attracts a guy who likes rubbing his wiener against a woman's butt. In the second, she hooks up with a guy at the back of a bus. Both scenes end with Yuma flashing her badge and busting the pervs.

    Where things get interesting is in the third scene, which starts at the film's 47-minute mark. Yuma, in a short black halter dress, fishnet stockings and open toe high-heel shoes, boards a bus and attracts the attention of a perv who stands behind her to fondle her ass. Nothing unusual so far (in Yuma's world, at least).

    But things quickly go awry. A second passenger starts fondling Yuma. Pervert No. 2 then jumps to his feet and grabs Yuma's arms from behind, as another two guys stand up to join the fun. The routine entrapment has morphed into a gang-bang rape. Yuma tries to reason with the fiends but to no avail -- she's going to get violated.

    Yuma fights to get free but can't pry herself loose. As the one guy holds her arms, the three other villains feel her up. Meanwhile, the bus driver pulls the bus into a vacant garage and and parks the vehicle, so he can also join in.

    As the guy standing behind Yuma uses his arms to lock Yuma's arms, the other villains pull Yuma's stockings down below her knees and undo the top of Yuma's dress to reveal her big tits, which get fondled. Two of the villains suck on Yuma's huge cans as Yuma squeals in protest.

    The villains lift up the bottom of Yuma's dress so that most of her fine body is on display. Yuma squirms as a number of pervs feel her up and one guy continues to suck on her left boobie.

    Yuma makes another attempt to break loose but she can't get free. The villains pull off her dress as the guy restraining Yuma applies more pressure to her arms, forcing her to comply with the disrobing. Lovely Yuma is left wearing only her bikini panties, her partially disrobed stockings and her shoes. The pervs continue to feel up Yuma's body and suck on her tits as Yuma continues to struggle.

    Yuma looks terrific in this scene. Her squirming discomfort is a joy to watch.

    The villains turn Yuma around so her back is facing most of the group. The perverts push the back of Yuma's panties to one side and pull her butt cheeks apart so her bung hole can be seen. The lead perv (the guy who first started fondling Yuma) sticks his face between the cheeks and gives protesting Yuma a serious rimming.

    The perverts remove Yuma's panties. As Yuma's arms continue to be restrained, a villain lifts her right leg in the air to allow the lead perv to finger-fuck Yuma. Yuma is diddled until she cums. The lead perv waves his cum-stained finger in front of Yuma's pretty face while the bus driver takes his turn sucking on Yuma's left jug. With Yuma still restrained behind the arms, the villains lift both of her legs in the air and suspended Yuma gets fingered again.

    The villains drag Yuma to the seat at the back of the bus and is held in a seated position. She then gets worked over with a couple of vibrators -- one on her tits and the other, of course, in her pussy.

    Helpless Yuma quivers and moans with intensity. She ultimately experiences a bone-rattling orgasm that leaves her still shaking even after the vibrator has been removed.

    One guy then stands on the back seat of the bus and Yuma is forced to blow the guy until he cums in her mouth.

    We jump to a new shot of the outside of the bus, which is still parked in the garage. The doors of the bus open and the villains emerge, marching naked Yuma to a nearby mattress (Missed Opportunity Alert: They should have carried her in the air, a la the derelict casino scene in A Clockwork Orange). The villains force Yuma to kneel on the mattress and they bend Yuma's arms behind her back, as one perv stands in front of Yuma and strips off his jeans and undies.

    Yuma resists but is ultimately forced to blow the guy, with her head pushed in for some serious deep throat action. Once the blow job is done, four of the villains force Yuma down on her back and spread her legs. Yuma twists and turns, putting up another spirited fight. But she can't get free and is actually well restrained by the perverts.

    The guy who got the blow job nails Yuma first, starting with the missionary position, as Yuma's arms are pinned to the mattress and her legs are held apart. In one particularly powerful moment, Yuma protests in squealed anguish (I'd pay money to learn what she's saying), prompting contemptuous laughs from the villains.

    The guys roll Yuma onto her stomach and she gets pumped that way, with the perverts keeping Yuma securely pinned to the mattress with her legs spread. And then it's back to the missionary position. Yuma's arms continue to be securely pinned as she is violated. The rapist finishes by shooting a big load on Yuma's face. To add insult to injury, Yuma is then forced to suck the rapist's dick for any remaining cum.

    The lead pervert then takes his turn tapping Yuma, once again in positions such as missionary. There's one unfortunate part, when the villains -- holding Yuma's arms -- make her ride the chief pervert cowgirl style, which looks a bit fake. But for the most part the second rape -- which includes some titty-fucking of Yuma's jumbo knockers -- is well done. The second rape ends with another cum shot to Yuma's face.

    Finally, Yuma is seen alone, abandoned and disgraced. With a blank, empty look in her eyes, she still has the presence of mind to wipe some of the cum off her face with a rag, which she keeps so there is DNA evidence for future prosecutions.

    But that's not the end of the movie. Yuma has a heart to heart with her boss and, in spite of everything, decides to stay on the job. She hops another ride on a bus and entraps another pervert.

    My grade: A

    The public molestation and gang-bang rape that are the highlights of this movie won't be to everyone's tastes. But for those who are into it, this film is a winner. Big-breasted Yuma is terrific. She looks believably humiliated as her clothes are removed and she is mauled, and for the most part her rape scenes are first-rate.

    This is easily the best GIMP film I've seen in at least the past three years. Highly recommended.

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 07:14:57 PM

    Name: JoeX

    From the caps The Dig, Part 1 looks awesome and Undercover Investigator looks like it could be just another Japanese bus grope movie, so it's great to have reviews to give the whole scoop on the action, the story, the acting, hidden tattoos, etc. Thanks, guys.

    jhlipton: I've double checked and the rape category is not on Fritz' list. Your memory is playing tricks on you.

    Joe X

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 10:50:28 PM

    Name: John Galt

    A Canadian: That was an outstanding review of Undercover Investigator of Perverts on a Bus. Yuma Asami is indeed quite yummy and your pictures were sensational, capturing the action perfectly. Taking 47 minutes to get to the GIMP action leads me to think the filmmakers were trying to make, you know, a real movie, but without scrimping on the GIMP when it came down to it. I can appreciate that attitude toward movie making.

    That was an excellent review. Thank you.

    * * * * *

    Dan Hawke: Great to hear from you. I am not so sure Kink, DungeonCorp and HardTied are necessarily out to corner the market so much as establish a level of acceptability. When Peter Ackworth purchased the The Armory in San Francisco to headquarter, he made a bold move toward getting people to see Kink as just another business enterprise--one with enough financial clout to purchase and renovate a landmark building. He didn't hang lurid red neon signs flashing NUDE BOUND GIRLS or open shop in a dark backroom of a dingy warehouse. I can respect his attempt to elevate his business enterprise above the uncomplimentary catch-all of "porn." Whether he will be successful remains to be seen.

    I don't know about DungeonCorp or HardTied. I still get kind of a sleazy backroom vibe from DungeonCorp, but that could just be attributed to my prejudice against garishly tattooed and freakishly pierced women, which seem to be the staple of DungeonCorp. Plus, Ogre kind of fits my visual image of a disreputable pornographer, which actually makes him an effective performer in his own productions. I really have no idea whether he wears three-piece suits or velour tracksuits when he is off-camera. And I haven't paid that much attention to HardTied.

    You make a convincing argument, though. Amazon is not the only Internet-based bookseller or movie seller, but it is the first place I check when I'm looking for something. I don't think Amazon will drive all other book and movie distributors off of the Internet, but it does impose penalties on the others by virtue of its size and name recognition.

    There will always be niche markets, though, that the Big Boys will not service for any number of reasons, and there are opportunities there. It could very well be that if your focus is simply "hot models in bondage," you will compete poorly against Kink, DungeonCorp and HardTied. But I haven't found anyone else who matches the uniquely twisted appeal of Powershotz, for example. And the websites that specialize--smoking, or strangulation/hanging/death fetish, or wrapping women in latex and strapping them to bizarre motor vehicle devices--will all succeed as long as those things appeal to enough people.

    I think your move to market via downloading is a smart move, though. My intuition is that downloading and streaming are the future.

    * * * * *

    The Dig: I may have unfairly dissed Iona Grace. Rain DeGrey has a hideous tattoo design crawling up her right thigh, from foot to hip. Cherry Torn has twin rows of bow tattoos running down the length of her back. But Iona Grace might be tattoo free--although she does have a nose ring, which I don't think is an attractive piercing. Whether accidentally or on purpose, The Dig was filmed in such a way as to minimize viewing the tattoos, where at all possible.

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 11:32:54 PM

    Name: Stormrider

    I don't know about "comfortable" Ralphus... ;).

    @YikYakker: The object in question is a cross type object from DM Productions (they make excellent Poser stuff). The pic itself is one of my older ones from 2007 or thereabouts. The only place I can think of that you may have seen it is Renderotica. I uploaded it to the gallery about that time. That one is still one of my favorites.

    Thursday, October 27th 2011 - 11:58:59 PM

    Name: Scribbler
    Homepage URL:

    Inspired by Stormrider here, and Villianovitch at deviantart (he does superheroine stuff), I thought I'd do some 3D renders for Halloween, and put them on a free page at my site.


    A Canadian: Thanks for the Undercover Investigator of Perverts on a Bus review. I suppose when you have a gang of guys holding her, you don't need real bondage. Works for me! Darn pixelation though. Wish they would stop doing that!?

    Great to hear from Dan. And good topic, but don't have time to comment right now. Gotta go promote my Halloween renders!

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 02:56:28 AM

    Name: Bill K.

    Stormrider where could that red wire be plug/connected too I wonder :)?

    Bill K.

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 03:00:17 AM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    Yik Yakker: But jhlipton wrote: My suspicion is that filming a successfully realistic role-play production might be all the government morality police need to roll in on Kink. They are certainly walking a fine line, and they are very likely aware of it.

    Not I, but Mssr Galt said that. (The way people are crediting me for stuff I didn't do, I'm going to claim I drew today's picture. Except that everyone knows the I would tape the electrodes to the underside of the breast. NEVER obscure the nipples!!!!!)

    Just think how much more entertaining this would be if she were bound hand and foot...attached to a weight...and wearing a bikini...or wearing nothing.

    There's a nice scene like that in "The Warrior and the Sorceress". Two dudes are talking and behind them a nude chick is thrown in a tank and the top latched down. They chat while she swims around frantically until she drowns. It's a pretty nice scene.

    As to Fabiana Andrade not wearing much of anything, will this do?

    if not, here she is with two friends:


    Ralphus: Hey, he[JohnM] makes what he likes, and that's what sells for him.

    More accurately, he makes what sells and that he likes. There are all sorts of projects he would like to do, but if they won't sell, h can't do them.


    Canadian: re Undercover Investigator of Perverts on a Bus

    One of my favorite disks from Video Mayhem is a similar film (called "Chikan"): 4 or 5 scenes, each with a girl in a nightclub getting groped, stripped, diddled and (in most cases) raped, with cum on her face. The crowd of people oblivious to the plight of the girl in their midst adds to the fun.


    John Galt (again): I can respect his attempt to elevate his business enterprise above the uncomplimentary catch-all of "porn." Whether he will be successful remains to be seen.

    He seems to have figured out what sells and what doesn't (I, for one, miss Water Bondage, although not enough to buy a film -- I plead mundane costs as the culprit). He's doing well enough to have a decent number of live-in full-time doms and subs (Check out The Upper Floor for what I mean).

    she does have a nose ring, which I don't think is an attractive piercing

    I don't care for them all that much, but anything beats the "stainless steel boogers". Yuck!

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 03:04:05 AM

    Name: MAV
    Homepage URL:

    Thanks darkeros & Blue Dog for pointing out the Flexislave C4S store ( The Lana Cova AOH whipping clip is awesome and she is a super-hardbody!

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 01:19:34 PM

    Name: eeeteee

    Guess I'm a heavyweight ... though too much blood, gore, death doesn't do anything for me.

    That contraption in the Stormrider pic was also featured in the witch fest classic ... Torture Rack Parts I & II ... where at the beginning, the victim was secured holding a lit candle in her mouth dripping over her tender self. Great production and awesome action throughout. Looking forward to Maleficarum and hope it continues the trend.

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 03:29:23 PM

    Name: DHT

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 05:30:20 PM

    Name: Fritz

    Dangerous Dave wrote:

    All this discussion of Lightweight or Heavyweight can be summed up by one movie right now. That movie is "A Serbian Film". If you like it, you are most definitely a "heavyweight".


    Our "Hero" then starts fucking her from behind and he is goaded into hitting her, which he does, violently bruising her back and ass,then he is handed a machete which he uses to more or less behead her while fucking her.

    I'd have to agree with your assessment that A Serbian Film is for heavyweights, but it is far from the most violent or even the most disturbing GIMP flick I've seen. There is plentiful nudity, and the snuff-porn milieu is always one to stir up controversy. But aside from the scene where the actress is beaten and "more or less" beheaded (as her noggin is completely separated from her body, I'd go with "more"), it's the usual dark and dreary fare.

    There was a lot of buzz about this film, even before it arrived in North America - with many folks implying that Serbia was the new land of unrestricted film production, like Argentina in the '70's ("where life was cheap"). A Serbian Film had a provocative trailer and wore its pseudo-snuff pretensions proudly, but there's nothing under the wrapping we haven't seen in American or West European productions, let alone the OTT stuff from Hong Kong and Japan.

    And just to show I'm not just crushing beer cans against my forehead, there are indeed films in which I find the GIMP scenes unwatchable. In fact, I own a DVD that I am afraid to play: Philosophy of a Knife. I saw a clip from this movie that I can't even bear to describe here, so I bought the thing more out of perverse fascination than any interest in actually watching it. I've read more about it since, and have become even more fearful. Just reading the names of the characters in the full cast list makes my skin crawl (the clip I saw featured "Insect Experiment Girl"). Perhaps the scariest thing is that it's four hours long.

    Anyone seen Philosophy of a Knife end-to-end and lived to share your opinions? Any other nominees for heaviest heavyweight film?

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 06:23:33 PM

    Name: Jane von Detlefson
    Homepage URL:

    Big Announcement!!!

    The DVD of Maleficarum is now available for pre-order at:

    The VermeerWorks Store and at

    The Red Feline DVD Store

    We will begin shipping Monday!

    The downloads are right now making their merry way to the content delivery network where they will be available on the 31st at: The VermeerWorks VOD Store and The RFPIX VOD Store

    Mac OS people may have to wait a few more hours to see the downloads appear in the store as there are a few versions and they take a bit longer to go up for sale.

    A bit of technical stuff: The DVD, and downloads for those who have PCs (Windows OS), will have access to optional English or German subtitles, an exciting commentary with JJ and I, and a "Behind the Scenes" reel with optional subtitles in English and German, in addition to the movie itself. PCs also have the option to burn this download to a DVD and watch it on a DVD player.

    The downloads for those who have Mac OS will be able to select the movie (they will be marked) specifically made for Mac OS and will have access to the movie with subtitles and the "Behind the Scenes" reel with subtitles.

    The audio commentary that JJ and I recorded is an informal chat about the movie ("Ouch, that looks like it hurts!"), and the making of the movie. I personally fall into raptures when I listen to it... *cough* There is also a "Behind the Scenes" reel that is 8 minutes long featuring goofs and out takes from the set of Maleficarum. (Hey, it's not easy wearing a huge dress and petticoats.)

    I'm really pleased with the way the movie turned out, JJ and I watched it the other night. I'd seen quite a bit of it before, but not the whole film from beginning to end, and I had to see it and give my opinion, because I'm a producer as well as being the star of the film.

    We've all been pushing ourselves to the point of collapse to get this movie out there. It's been a lot more complicated in the post production than other mainstream films we've made, because of all of the special effects.We decided to have English and German subtitles, because of the high volume of German fans asking us pretty please, and the printer has finally told us we can pick up the beautiful covers of the DVDs on Monday, hooray!

    Hopefully soon, I can sleep for a few days straight and see Fright Night in 3D. (I just want to, ok? Don't judge.).

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 06:50:04 PM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    Jane von Detlefson: It's great to hear everything is in place for Monday's official release of Maleficarum. This is probably the GIMP equivalent of the release of a Harry Potter book. I wonder if Ralphus had to sign a confidentiality agreement where he promises not to release details in advance?


    Thanks to everyone who provided feedback on my review of Undercover Investigator of Perverts on a Bus. Things have been a bit crazy for me these days so I'm glad I was able to get the review completed and posted before the Maleficarum tsunami overtakes us.

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 07:42:02 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    A Canadian wrote: Thanks to everyone who provided feedback on my review of Undercover Investigator of Perverts on a Bus.

    Sorry to be a latecomer but I too enjoyed your review, and the caps were terrific.

    Interestingly, I had come across a bevy of Yuma Asami pics the other day and thought to myself, "Wonder if she is a JAV superstar? I should ask the Nipponophiles on the GIMP site about her." And before I got a chance, presto! Canadian comes up with a review! It's like you read my mind. Awesome.

    I read an article a few years back about how groping and fondling on Japan's public transportation system was becoming a vexing and intractable social problem. Seems it's exacerbated by crowding, which makes it easier for gropers to get away with what they are doing and remain anonymous.

    But I much prefer the situation in this movie, where a group of guys sets upon one babe, strips her and has their way with her completely. No cumbersome crowds to deal with.


    Stormrider: I'm sure you're right because it would have been a few years ago since I saw that pic. Isn't it funny how most of my memories are mush, but that particular image made such an impact on my brain that immediate recognition was possible? Now that's good art!


    jhlipton and Msr. Galt: Sorry for mixing up the attribution of that statement. Y' know, sometimes my fingers move on the keyboard but my brain fails to keep up with them.

    Then again, you two are so alike.;)


    jhlipton: Oooh, The Warrior and the Sorceress...I remember the scene you described. Best (and probably only) GIMPage in that whole flick, if I recall correctly, and yes, it was well done.

    Otherwise, the movie was standard B-grade fare, but was helped immensely by the fact that the leading lady, Maria Socas, spent the entire running time in "outfits" that covered almost nothing. She was put in shackles, but not in a very sexy or strict fashion. Still, I liked when she escaped wearing nothing but a teeny bottom piece. Really connected with a lot of my non-GIMP fantasies.

    Damn, I wish more movies were like that. Hey, maybe Red Feline can do a remake of it. Just think, wouldn't have to buy as much fabric to make the costumes.


    Scribbler: Really enjoyed your 3-D Halloween special. Mind if I enlarge those pics and use them as decorations?


    Fritz: I don't know how this stacks up to the movie you mentioned, but recently I skimmed through something called Ichi the Killer. I was hoping to find some GIMPage that did not involve blood and gore, but failed in the attempt.

    Friday, October 28th 2011 - 10:04:05 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    A Canadian: Thanks very much for another fine review. It really helps having vidcaps to go along with it to give us a visual look at the words you're using to describe the action. And I can see the reason why you're so hung up on Yuna Asami...very hot young woman. It's no surprise she's a superstar in Japan.

    But...(and you knew this was coming) bondage at all? I mean, I love watching women getting raped, and I suppose a restrained rape works as long as she's being held down. But me, I like seeing them tied up. That's why they're called bondage films, you know? And this is the best GIMP film you've seen in 3 years? Obviously, our standards are different, way different.

    The link to your latest review is in my Homepage URL above.


    Fritz: I've seen Philosophy of a Knife, or at least scanned through it to find the good parts. There is one outstanding electric shock torture scene with a beautiful young woman, but even that goes over the top and descends into some nasty bloody stuff, including her getting her tongue sliced off at the end, a la Mark of the Devil. I'm not sure I could take 4 hours of viewing the entire movie in real time, but for sure it's got some pretty arresting content, most of it quite unpleasant.

    But go for it, Mr. Poster Boy for Heavyweight GIMPness. Don't be afraid. You can take it!


    Jane von Detlefson: Perfect timing showing up the final weekend and giving us information on pre-ordering the most eagerly awaited film in recent memory. If there's any reason why anyone doesn't feel it's worth taking on chance on purchasing, I'd like to hear why. If you're going to buy a GIMP movie this year, this would have to be the one. I'll be downloading it on Halloween and of course be giving it my honest opinion soon afterward. My fingers are crossed that it'll be good.


    A Canadian wrote:

    This is probably the GIMP equivalent of the release of a Harry Potter book. I wonder if Ralphus had to sign a confidentiality agreement where he promises not to release details in advance?

    Ha! Not even close. I may officially be an associate producer, but I don't know any more than you guys do about the details, especially about the secret ending to the film. In a way, that's just the way I like it. I want to be surprised. I'm not even going to look at the production stills that Jane's going to be sending me until I watch the movie, except for the first few so I can have something to put on the site. Gonna be hard to resist the temptation to look, though.

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 01:23:46 AM

    Name: Renzo Novatore

    "But now we've got jhlipton and YikYakker claiming that the lightweight position on rape is "fondle, at most" That was probably meant as a joke, but it has confused things to the point that Renzo says he is a heavyweight and then adds that he doesn't like blood or death. Wait, what?"

    Well, what I meant was that, on a scale of mainstream sexual preferences, I'd probably be more on the "heavier" side. I mean, I like a lot of weird stuff, bondage, really rough sex, rape, asphyxiation, electro-torture, etc. Buuut...if the heavier scale consists exclusively of tons o' blood and gore and corpses, then no, definitely not heavyweight. Blood generally isn't a turn on for me. Death never is a turn on for me.

    I also agree about the lack of bondage being kind of a deal breaker...personally if given the choice between a rape video with no bondage, or a bondage video with no sex, I'd choose the latter. That's just me though.

    Finally, I can't remember who reviewed the Whipped Ass episode starring Sensi Pearl, Good recommendation. I watched it recently and it's probably one of my all time favorite lesbian domination videos. Not so much because of the dom's actions (Bobbi Starr, while beautiful, didn't really seem that into it, or at least not in comparison to some other dominants), but because the submissive is just so gorgeous and has such beautiful reactions. A really great piece of pornography, that.

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 03:59:38 AM

    Name: Dangerou Dave

    Fritz- About a "Serbian Film". Maybe not the strongest film out there, but "newborn porn"? I've never seen that before, and that's right up there with about the sickest things you can show in a film.

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 07:13:09 AM

    Name: John Galt

    Renzo Novatore: If you like Sensi Pearl in intense BDSM situations, you might also check out her Device Bondage shoot, which I also reviewed. In fact, Device Bondage is doing another series of shoots with her, with Isis Love as the dom, that are being released now. Two have been posted (Oct 12th and Oct 19th) and usually there is a third one. They are also good, but that first one (that I reviewed) was the most intense, in my opinion. She is definitely hot, and her response to pain and stimulation is exciting to watch.

    * * * * *

    Jane von Detlefson: Great to hear that Maleficarum is available for pre-ordering. I will have to get that done this weekend. Thanks for the heads-up. How did the screening go?

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 09:52:23 AM

    Name: YikYakker

    I'm really glad that Maleficarum is about to make its debut.

    So is Jane...

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 03:12:31 PM

    Name: MAV
    Homepage URL:

    Holy shit GIMPers, have you heard of Mundo Perro?! Looks like a Spaniard porn film with several GIMP scenes.

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 07:37:33 PM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    Sloth will be pleased to know that my review of Slave Town 2 with Maria Ozawa has been upgraded to include some video caps. My thanks, as always, to Ralphus for his help with the upgrades.


    YikYakker wrote:

    I'm really glad that Maleficarum is about to make its debut.

    So is Jane...

    That was funny.

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 09:57:01 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    MAV: Nice find on Mundo Perro (English title "Dog World"). Pretty elaborate website for a hardcore film. Looks like The Road Warrior with some hardcore sex and bondage thrown in the mix; to me it looks more like the type of film that Teraz Films put out. The women look like porn stars; I saw some tattoos in there, unfortunately. Still, some nice fire imagery and AOH bondage on the site.

    Looks like the film has been out a few years; they're promoting it as a 2008 release. Might be hard to track down. Hey, I know! I'll bet Netflix has it! (bursting into mock laughter)

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 11:21:23 PM

    Name: jhlipton
    E-mail address:

    Ralphus: If you're going to buy a GIMP movie this year, this would have to be the one?

    I haven't wanted to say anything, but for some reason, Red Feline leaves me underwhelmed. I don't understand it -- Jane is hot, the tortures are nice, every one of their films should be on my Must-Have list.

    Due to Real Life budget issues, I don't think I can afford $40 to $50 for Maleficarum, even though I would love to support Jane.


    MAV: Holy shit GIMPers, have you heard of Mundo Perro?! Looks like a Spaniard porn film with several GIMP scenes.

    It looks like a porn movie with a few scenes of fairly light bondage. It looks like there's a scene of man-rape, and most of the rest looks very vanilla. Bored now.

    Saturday, October 29th 2011 - 11:49:10 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Thank you Stormrider for your terrific poser art and hope you find a site to display your new and old artwork soon. I must ask one last question of you if I may? Why do you gag most of your damsels in bats and torture chamber peril? It is not bad or good thing to me for I am just curious as to why.

    Bill K.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 12:36:38 AM

    Name: Matt

    Stormrider: Many thanks for your artwork! And may you soon find an online home for your portfolio. You do excellent work, and a permanent home is certainly in order.

    As for the poll question, I'd be in the middle. I've enjoyed seeing's material (Hogtied and Sexandsubmission), and have had access to some Insex stuff in the past, and have enjoyed both categories. If I want more serious torture and (if necessary) execution, then darkspot's in order-and there are some scenarios where execution following a serious interrogation (or two, or three, or however many is necessary to break the subject) is in order (Enemy of the State, terrorist or espionage suspect, etc.), though for most continued captivity is my preference, as they may be still useful in the future.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 02:59:04 AM

    Name: Heroone
    E-mail address:

    I like your site

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 03:42:34 AM

    Name: Heroone
    E-mail address: GrrryBear46@Comcast.Net

    Hi... I be the newbie to this forum... I am look forward to download that new Inquisition movie from VeermerWorks... I stuck with IMac OS10.? snowleopard. I saw warnings on the update from them... Was there a delay for IMac users?

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 03:53:22 AM

    Name: Heroone
    E-mail address: GerryBear46@Comcast.Net

    Never mind (Gilda Radner), I miss her humor.

    I just scrolled down and saw similar comments for apple device users that was very clear... Thank you all

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 04:05:12 AM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    jhlipton wrote:

    Due to Real Life budget issues, I don't think I can afford $40 to $50 for Maleficarum, even though I would love to support Jane.

    Although it wasn't that many years ago that a price like that would have seemed reasonable, it's definitely on the high end these days -- at least for those of us who normally buy Japanese stuff (which, admittedly, is pirated).

    I won't plunk down that kind of money until I've read the official Ralphus Review of Maleficarum. Even then, I'll have to determine whether the film will push my buttons, as Ralphus and I don't always share the same tastes.

    Based on what I believe is in the movie (I'm too lazy to go back and read Reine Margot's posts), here are some completely uninformed predictions:

    • The burning-at-the-stake scene (or scenes) won't work. This would be a tough scene to pull off, and my sense from the teaser on YouTube is the scene will look phony.

    • The rape scene (or scenes?) will work. The rape scene in Agent X was good and no special effects are required, so I'm predicting this part will be a winner.

    • The scene with Jane roasting on the spit ... may or may not work (a bold prediction). The stills look good so I'm cautiously optimistic the scene will be believable. Whether it proves to be erotic is another matter.

    • The whipping scenes will work. Red Feline has definitely been hit and miss when it comes to whipping scenes. But I accept in good faith that Jane and crew got the message and they'll get it right this time.

    I guess we'll know soon enough.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 10:58:27 AM

    Name: YikYakker

    jhlipton wrote: ...for some reason, Red Feline leaves me underwhelmed.

    It might be for the same reason I've had - they really need to have a more suitable villain.

    Red Feline has indicated that this time, they have cranked things up a few notches. I'm hoping that means that by hiring more actors, they've given Jane and Mila some convincing baddies to play off of.

    That would've given JJ a better opportunity to direct the action and move the camera angles around more. Good upside potential there.

    I plan to go the download route. That method is less expensive but still supports the cause.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 11:28:57 AM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:

    A Canadian wrote:

    Although it wasn't that many years ago that a price like that would have seemed reasonable, it's definitely on the high end these days -- at least for those of us who normally buy Japanese stuff (which, admittedly, is pirated).

    Right, if you're used to used to buying 6 dollar bootlegs of Japanese DVDs, it's definitely going to seem high. I was wondering how much they would be asking for Maleficarum and I figured that would be the price, based on what their other movies go for. I agree, $44.99 is a bit on the high end, although I don't think it's unreasonable, especially if you consider the content you'll likely get for your money. A better sell-thru price would have been $29.99. In my opinion, they would likely sell more at that price, even though they're making less on each sale.

    Fetish material does usually cost more than mainstream movies you could buy for 24 bucks at Best Buy. Just as a lark, I did a quick check on ZFX. Bon-Vue is selling all their ZFX DVDs for $49.95, for instance. Are they worth it? I've seen all the ZFX titles; some are worth it, others aren't. That's likely the case with some of Red Feline's stock. Some of their movies that are just endless whipping don't interest me and I wouldn't pay that much. This is a high end movie that is likely worth the higher price.

    I won't plunk down that kind of money until I've read the official Ralphus Review of Maleficarum. Even then, I'll have to determine whether the film will push my buttons, as Ralphus and I don't always share the same tastes.

    Ha! You think? We're nearly polar opposites, although we both enjoyed Red Feline's Agent X, clearly a film designed more for torture guys like me as opposed to a Rape Man like you.

    Your predictions and comments about the movie are thoughtful and spot-on, IMO. And since this is Sunday, and with football the only real sport left being played, that gives me the impetus to comment on your opinions and give you my


  • The burning-at-the-stake scene (or scenes) won't work. This would be a tough scene to pull off, and my sense from the teaser on YouTube is the scene will look phony.

    As a connoisseur of burning at the stake scenes, and one who's seen a lot of them, my guess is that they will pull it off, although when I first saw the stills, I groaned at how small the pyre was. Going cheap on the wood, for whatever reason, was not something I would have done, and I was an advisor on how to film the BATS. They didn't ask me how much wood to use. If they had, I would have said a LOT as opposed to a little. Still, I'm cautiously optimistic here.

  • The rape scene (or scenes?) will work. The rape scene in Agent X was good and no special effects are required, so I'm predicting this part will be a winner.

    I haven't seen any stills from that at all, but Jane is an excellent actress and I predict you'll be correct.

  • The scene with Jane roasting on the spit ... may or may not work (a bold prediction). The stills look good so I'm cautiously optimistic the scene will be believable. Whether it proves to be erotic is another matter.

    Obviously, this was the scene I paid the money for, it's one of my dream scenes, and likewise, I'm on the fence about how they're going to pull it off. Most of the time, these scenes fail on film because they are illusions and one can tell they are trying to fake it and credibility is blown. The good thing is that Jane was really roasting over the coals, it was not faked. So as long as JJ was wise enough to give us establishing shots that show her and the smoking coals below her in the same shot, it has a chance to be great. I haven't seen a shot like that in the few promo shots released, however.

  • The whipping scenes will work. Red Feline has definitely been hit and miss when it comes to whipping scenes. But I accept in good faith that Jane and crew got the message and they'll get it right this time.

    The good thing here is that JJ is behind the camera and not in front of it this time. Most critics of Red Feline's whipping scenes usually (and rightfully) cast the blame on him as the villain. Turning that role over to other people might just be the best move he makes on this movie. I expect they'll get it right.

    I guess we'll know soon enough.

    That we will. I know what I'll be doing tomorrow. Play ball!

  • Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 12:31:13 PM

    Name: Jane von Detlefson
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    I add my thanks to you Stormrider for the amazing images! You have a large portfolio of quality work. And in today's picture with the guillotine... Um... anybody notice that big post with the plate 'o spikes behind her? That's awesome! Who's gonna send me one for Christmas? But seriously, I love it so much I think we have to incorporate that into a movie. Imagine a ratchet that stretches on a post that has spikes. Or an AOH whipping on that post. Nice.

    A bit of an update on Maleficarum downloads: The PC download for Europe (PAL) with English and German subtitles will be up on the 31st, but most likely sometime in the afternoon. I'll post when I know more closely what time it will be up.

    Heroone - Glad you found the parts of my post about the Mac OS specs. To update, we have two Mac OS versions. The first that will be available is the English subtitled version with the English subtitled "Behind the Scenes" reel. It will most likely appear the 1st of November. The second version is the German subtitled movie with German subtitled "Behind the Scenes" reel. (Deutsch-Version für Mac OS: Film mit deutschen Untertiteln. Einsicht hinter den Kulissen mit deutschen Untertiteln.) And that will most likely appear on November 2nd. I wish all of them could go up at the same time, but technology won't allow us to do that. At least it's not that long to wait.

    I wrote to Ralphus earlier this month about a viewing of the movie we had, which was rather funny, and he thought I should share, so I'll tell it to y'all here.

    We had an informal viewing of several scenes of Maleficarum, one of them was about 2 minutes of the roasting scene on JJ's birthday. Our crew was over for a little party and he wanted to show off our work to each other. Only one other person was there who was not involved in the production, a female friend of JJ's son (he's really not into GIMP, but a good sport), she's about 23/24 years old and very normal. Like normal normal.

    I watched her face as we were watching the torture scenes and she was utterly horrified. It was funny. The rest of us were laughing, she must have thought we were nuts. Apparently, after the party when JJ's son was taking her to a taxi she asked if the roasting scene was going to be that long in the final version. He said, "Um, that was only the last two minutes...". When he came back from walking her to a taxi, he tried to get us to agree to cut down the torture scenes. JJ and I sat on the couch quietly listening to him, attentive looks on our faces, and then burst out laughing at him. We laughed for a good couple of minutes or so. JJ's son got the idea and walked out muttering about us being crazy or something. It was hilarious.

    A few days later, apparently after JJ's son had told his lady friend about our reaction, she amended her statement in a complete non sequitur to say that she wished she had boobs like mine. A non sequitur of that caliber is rare.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 12:39:03 PM

    Name: John Galt

    Maleficarum: A little more expensive than I had hoped, but not prohibitive. I will definitely do the DVD, so I guess I'm still a few weeks away from satisfying my curiosity. This will be my first Red Feline production. I have been tempted on a couple of occasions in the past, but just never pulled the trigger. This one, though, sounds like it might be my idea of the "if you only watch one Red Feline production, make it this one" feature.

    There are always elements to everything we watch that anyone can isolate and use to justify not wanting to watch it or pay for it. Honestly, I have never seen anything that I couldn't find some fault with or flaw in. That's probably because it is much easier to criticize and pick apart than to visualize and create. So unless something is a complete failure, or fails to deliver the one thing it promised and screwed up, I'm generally satisfied.

    I am not a torture aficionado, so I am not expecting Maleficarum to be the ultimate GIMP movie for me personally. Still, I expect it will have a lot of the elements that I like: hot chicks, lots of nudity, tautly stretched sweat-covered female torsos, and hopefully a rape or two.

    I am interested in seeing how well they pull off the fire scenes, but I have no expectations. It's all about the effects anyway, since I have no interest in seeing burning hair or black, crispy flesh. Where one person will complain that there were too few flames and they didn't look close enough, someone else will critique that there's no way she could have lasted that long without burning up, so it wasn't realistic. Someone might even comment on how the coals sound, and suggest that coals don't really sound like that when roasting a human being. You just never know.

    I do think Maleficarum is the closest production I have ever heard of being done with the tastes of the GIMP forum in mind, and for that I feel a tiny obligation to support it and give it a chance. I don't think mainstream movies will be doing anything spectacular any time soon, and I know that unless I support the producers I like, mainstream crap might be what I have to make do with.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 01:09:05 PM

    Name: YikYakker

    Stormrider: It's been great having your artwork here on a daily basis. Very educational and entertaining. I think the experience has made us all better GIMPers.


    Jane von Detlefson wrote: ...she amended her statement in a complete non sequitur to say that she wished she had boobs like mine.

    You mean she wants to have hers roasted too?


    So I made a half-hearted attempt and succeeded in finding a place that's selling Mundo Ferro (Dog World).

    I say half-hearted because I don't have any immediately plans to buy it, having reserved what's left of my GIMP budget for Maleficarum.


    Last night I was having a party down in my game room - you know, the one next to the dungeon. Among the guests were a group of music recording bigwigs.

    Melita, whose musical ambitions greatly exceed her talent, decided to stage an impromptu audition in an effort to impress them.

    Needless to say, she failed.

    I told my guests I would be back in a moment, and grabbing Melita, I escorted her through the door to the dungeon. Then I gagged her, tied her up AOH and ripped her swimsuit off.

    Returning to the party, I asked the music industry honchos if they would stay a while longer after everyone else left. Later, I took them on a tour of my dungeon. They were impressed with the work I had done on Melita. So I invited them to stay as long as they wanted and have their way with her.

    They may still be down there for all I know. Never did bother to check on Melita.

    Probably won't, with all the football games on today.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 02:12:05 PM

    Name: A Canadian

    Ralphus: Interesting pre-game report. One thing I would add is that Red Feline can sometimes surprise us with scenes that work better than expected.

    For example, I remember thinking the crucifixion scene at the end of Agent X was quite good. That statement wouldn't mean anything to Red Feline's fan base, as that's one of the reasons they like the Red Feline films -- but I'm not normally into crucifixions. In Agent X, though, the crucifixion scene was quite erotic.

    So there could be some surprises in Maleficarum.

    Assuming the film passes the Ralphus test, my plan is to initially rent it for a seven-day period. If it passes the Canadian test, I will purchase a download to own sometime later.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 04:18:46 PM

    Name: MAV
    Homepage URL:

    Just to wrap up Mundo Perro, it's mostly porn with plot (ugh) with the 2 scenes Ralphus found caps of are pretty much the only GIMPage. As an AOH fan, I really dug the nude AOH scene with the hot Lesly Kiss where she's doused with 2 buckets of water, hit with a crop a few times, then "raped".

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 04:34:22 PM

    Name: Heroone
    E-mail address: GerryBear46@Comcast.Net

    To Jane: Many thanks for the kind word, and additional info for Apple users. I need to learn patience, and maybe wait for the DVD copy.

    I hav been drawn to watching WSIM scenes every since sneaking out of HS class in 1962 with a few others, to old Royal theatre on Polk Street and watched The Mongols (local Boy, Jack Palance). I remember that Whipping scene was at lease 60 seconds longer. After Amina shouted "Oh God", (YouTube, cut to the whip being hand off to Anita); Amina said "No More", "Stop", etc. and you could see her right breast side view when her body twisted and then camera moved to her face with some of her hair stuck to the forehead of sweaty face. Oh yes, no whip marks.

    Like a voyeur of accident scenes, you have a ugh moment, but can't take resist looking.

    Jane, I don't how much of your films were acting, it looked all too real. I purchased Agent X, Fantom, and Training Jane; and recently order Red Room from Red Feline. I remember telling Margot in a posting to Red Feline Forum or Janet at the old Thralldom site, about me getting whipped with a real leather Cat when I crashed an S/M whatever in a real dungeon, in a real castle of a very wealthy woman.

    I only gotten three strokes, mostly defensive cuts on my right arm and shoulder; but my friend, her back and butt look bad, like some of Mariana's wounds seen on this site. The owner of this castle did get us a doctor and a plainclothes police escort (we were now guest/trespassers) to BhanHoff and free first class ride out of dodge. At least I didn't have use up the twenty 50 deutsch marks to bribe the conductor to keep our door lock because we need to move the six seats forward to form a bed ( a big no-no) for her take off her coat and lay on her stomach and until we can get to friends in Ulm. Thank God we didn't have cross any borders.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 05:21:39 PM

    Name: A Canadian

    Heroone: That was a great story. I think you've come to the right place.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 06:31:45 PM

    Name: Wallym
    E-mail address:

    Just watched Malificarum download. Amazing. The movie was extremely well done and very convincing. The whippings and rack seen were great. Both actresses were really good. Please more movies like this. I pretty much have all Red Feline movies.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 08:23:00 PM

    Name: Reine Margot
    Homepage URL:

    A new post from Reine Margot on the eve of MALEFICARUM's release

    The time is now. The word is out, Maleficarum is out there in our DVD store, and for downloads

    As the 31st of October enters through the gates of time with witches galore, the world begins to download Maleficarum.

    As I began to write this post the countdown for Maleficarum read 9 days ... in practical terms that was nothing. We were working very, very hard getting all those many details ready.

    Jane was so stressed out that she got sick while Mila appeared to be extremely quiet, doing her job as if no one else existed... We thought she was mad at us or something.

    JJ, in the meantime was on the verge of a breakdown but we could hardly notice because he kept his cool but we all knew that the clock was ticking inside of his head and as he went through the film he wished he had another 9 months to make it perfect.

    That's the life of filmmakers.. lots of excitement and fun during the shooting of a movie, lots of stress before releasing it.

    The release of Maleficarum is a big deal for us, for sure. Is it bigger than other releases present, past, future? Not really, but it's special because it's different. Because it's a crossover movie.

    We were going to have a screening with the execs some time ago, but a family matter for JJ forced him to postpone that screening, he requested for a day Mir two later but the Cinemateque was in the middle of preparing two festivals so they decided for the Wednesday after that. Weird. But when JJ, Mila and Beto went to the screening, they found out that due to the cinemateca's confusing times, the screening was canceled.

    Their guy in charge of the Media told them that the film will be shown there and that they want to do a lot of promotion. Next day Beto, who is our associate producer and inquisitor, got word that this coming Monday 31st, the programmers at the Cinemateca will be scheduling the film anyway, without seeing it. So... it appears that we'll have a theatrical release after all, but I don't count on it yet. So, after we release the film online we will know when and if (in Hungarian we use the same word for both MEG) the film will have a theatrical run.

    If it does, we will have a premiere, yes, as a press event with guests, mostly cast, crew and friends... but later, maybe in two or three weeks time. By then most of our fans would have seen the movie... those inclined to get it, of course.

    However we're prepared to be rejected. Seeing the film as it is, one gets the feeling that it's a hard film to watch and to accept. ... or maybe we're underestimating the capacity of the audience.

    What are we riding with this film? Our future?

    No, even if it feels that way. But no. The adventure of making this movie was rewarding enough. We pulled it off and we're very proud of that fact. We feel accomplished in ways that are impossible to measure.

    We feel that we can release this movie and watch it go wherever the wind takes it. That's exciting to us. What drove us nuts was having a deadline. A date when the film must be ready for downloads. That was the stressing part, but it was also fun watching us suffer for our art.

    Now it's up to the technology, the Internet connections, the postal service... all those elements that are beyond our control. It's up to the delivery system, our work is done.

    We're extremely happy that we had the opportunity to do this and we're grateful for the encouragement from everyone here but most importantly the big push Ralphus gave to the project. This movie happened because he believed in us. That's the honest truth.

    We were doing other things, we were preparing to shoot Barbazul and that was it for last year. Gabrielle was scheduled to arrive in November and we were all set, our crew was ready, so was the script and the cast, when suddenly Jane told JJ that there was an offer on the table for the inquisition movie that JJ had in mind for the future.

    We took the offer but we did one better, we decided to make it bigger than originally planned.

    One year later to the date, we were wrapping up the last of the post production, working 15 hrs a day and it was crazy here, but at the same time it was and it is exciting.

    The movie is on its way where it belongs and we are curious to know what the reaction will be to the movie. And for what I'm reading here.... there's a lot of speculation and anticipation.

    Maleficarum happened because everything fell into place. A few years back Jane and JJ were talking about making an inquisition movie, JJ mentioned a place he knew, a club that looked like a dungeon. They talked to the guy that was running the club and he was interested in renting it to them for three days, from Sunday to Tuesday, the days he wasn't open for biz.

    Time passed and then when the idea returned, when Ralphus offered a big incentive. JJ went to check if the club was available... and lo and behold, it was empty. The club moved out. So... the location was available... We rented it for a few months.

    Meanwhile, a friend of JJ gave an acting workshop and asked JJ a favor, to hold a screen test for her actors as part of their training. Suddenly we had all the actors we needed. Not to mention Mila a newly found actress who was going to start her acting in La Jaula, a film that was postponed indefinitely to work in Maleficarum. The rest fell into place with such an ease that it was scary. Maleficarum was meant to be.

    We're beyond the good old days of shooting, the days when Mila learned what the whip felt like on her soft and tight skin, the days when Jane was preparing herself to be roasted on a spit, a torture she was not completely sure she wanted to go through.

    It was a year ago, to be exact, when we started this adventure. A crazy time of production where we came up with three feature films. It was on the 17th of October when the cameras started rolling. Those were the nice days. ... we miss those days, specially the crew, those not involved in post, who wonder when are we going back to shoot something, anything, as long as there are naked ladies in it.

    We just went through the terrible days of pre-release, painful, stressful, anxiety filled days where JJ had to get a big supply of Vitamin C and lots of beer.

    We are wondering how will the film be received. We know we'll be criticized. We know the critics, if they don't ignore us, will tear the film to pieces and not because it's badly made, but because of the subject matter, and we're ready for that. We expect it, we welcome it.

    We know our fans will go crazy, they are already going crazy, the second the film appeared in the DVD store, we started selling DVDs...

    And as much as everyone worked hard to make this film a beauty to behold, we know we won't make everybody happy, especially because of the high expectations that we're generating, however, we think a lot of people will love it.

    We're counting on that and not because of sales, we don't really worry about that too much. This was a labor of love and sacrifice, it was a painful, really painful experience for our courageous heroines, particularly Jane who sat on that wooden, sharp, splintery Spanish Horse and experienced what a barbeque would feel like for a chicken if the chicken was alive but without its protecting feathers.

    Maleficarum is our collective child and we're proud of it, really proud, but scared as any parent is when the child leaves the comforts of home to face the big, wide, cold world. We can just hope that the film will find a home, hundreds, thousands, millions of homes where it will be loved.

    We loved making this movie so much that we want to make more like this, not less. We see the happy faces of our cast and crew who are just proud to be part of this and we know we have to continue working and that's what we're planning now.

    The initial reaction to the DVD sales was just great, so we're going to be looking into what happens with the VOD and we'll start working on our future plans.

    We haven't done anything other than Maleficarum for many weeks now, so all our plans were on hold, but now we're looking into that and on the crystal ball that tells us what we can do soon.

    It's interesting to read those pre game comments, not only those made by Ralphus, but all the comments, including those we get in our private e-mails.

    I particularly like the comment that we're the equivalent of a Harry Potter movie for the GIMP community. That's really, really nice. But it's also scary. I know Jane will hate the next episode of Twilight... I just know it. And I know why. It will not live up to her expectations of a good vampire movie.

    That's our drama. If there were no expectations whatsoever, the movie would blow people's minds big time, really, more, a lot more than when we came up with Red Feline on The Cross, which blew people's minds in ways that we did not anticipate.

    But there are big, huge, expectations and that's scary.

    But we know we did something very, very big, even if we didn't have a million dollars and all the dream equipment we hope to have in the future. We did a lot more for the money, lots, lots more and we learned one thing, that we can. We simply can pull off a big, complex, production with few resources. Oh the things we're dreaming about now... oh yes... Jess Franco, move over, Jane and JJ are here. Red Feline is here.

    And now a little surprise, a one minute trailer with a lot of stuff from the movie and a bit of news. The NTSC version of the film, with English subtitles, for the PC is already in our VOD store, you can GET IT NOW.
    And so, the time has arrived!..... (If you see some typos here... forget them and forgive me, no time to proof read, I have to go watch a movie and have a drink.)
    Reine Margot

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 08:28:08 PM

    Name: Bill K.

    Margot/Ralphus/anyone does download to PC. ONLY mean you can only view it on your PC and you can NOT download to a DVD format disk to view it on your big screen TV? Bill K.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 10:00:03 PM

    Name: Jane von Detlefson
    Homepage URL:

    Bill K. - The PC-only version means that people with PCs (Windows OS) can download the DVD, access the menus, extras, etc, watch it on their computer and burn to disk.

    The reason we differentiate is because Mac OS users will need to download a different version in order to access the subtitles and extras. :)

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 10:06:45 PM

    Name: Fritz

    YikYakker wrote:

    So I made a half-hearted attempt and succeeded in finding a place that's selling Mundo Ferro (Dog World).

    Thanks man. You've actually provided the names of two places. One is European and does not allow for downloads (15 Euros) nor DVD sales (38 Euros!) to Canada - every other developed nation, but not mine. I know, I know... how can a country of beaver-loving, igloo dwelling beer drinkers call itself developed? Well, if Belgium is on the damn list, we should be too. The other vendor offers streaming downloads, which do not appeal to me.

    And then I read MAV's synopsis, and noticed one of the stores categorized the film as "for women". Clearly, this is not something for a jaded, heavyweight GIMPer like me, though I have to say the web site and the preview did make for some tasty bait.

    It's interesting that Perro Mundo shares its title with the infamous Mondo Cane, the 1962 film which launched a string of Mondo movies, many "revealing" a real-life BDSM underworld, which was quite shocking 50 years ago. A Google search also informed me that Dog World is one of the more esteemed publications aimed at canine fanciers. It's tempting to send the editors a link to the movie site. Finally, there appears to be a sequel: Dog World 2: The Resolution.

    * * * * *

    esso wrote about MAV's custom:

    the acting in the custom video was abysmal, unless you prefer girls who squeak instead of scream and an interrogator who pulls his punches to a ridiculous degree. Too bad, the set up was enough to get me to waste the money.

    I bought this clip too, and though it's by no means the best I've seen, it isn't nearly as dire as you suggest. Both the victims were genuinely easy on the eyes, and the blonde reacted reasonably well to her punishment. As is usually the case, the villain was the biggest problem. I was particularly annoyed by his ambiguous questioning - "give me the information" - with no additional context. If you show an interrogation, make it clear what it's about: drugs? military secrets? where's Waldo? Otherwise, I thought I got my money's worth.

    * * * * *

    And now, like almost everyone else here, I'm off to download Maleficarum.

    Sunday, October 30th 2011 - 10:09:31 PM

    Name: Heroone
    E-mail address: GerryBear46@Comcast.Net

    Dear Canadian and Jane,

    Its 21:40 here in San Francisco, and just finish downloading, view once the 1 min 16 sec trailer from VeermerWorks on my IMac using RealPlayerDownloader to convert into a apple friendly .mp4... Oh my God. Jane you are an Actor; don't let anyone call you a "Fetish Model" ever.

    Like a moth to a flame, I wait until the morrow and decide whether to or not to do a download when the Apple version become available. I did expect the new actor Mila Joya to be so attractive.

    Monday, October 31st 2011 - 12:52:00 AM

    Name: Sloth

    Now this is starting off a great day even though I will miss Stormrider's stuff - picked up the mail and received the November 1966 issue of "Man's Epic" picked up on eBay for a reasonable price - the inside torment story concerns nubile young ladies abducted, confined in a dungeon and tortured by.........yes, you guessed it, a maniacal misshapen dwarf - as I read it it seems to be paying homage to our host gnome.

    Then I find my faith in humanity restored as A Canadian had me in mind with his "Slave Town 2" upgrade - alas poor Maria, how could you mar that magnificent form with that ink.

    I then dash over to Red Feline and order my dvd of "Maleficarum" - rather hoping Jane and Mila deliver it direct to the door and allow me to be the inquisitor - or better still not allow me and I do it anyway.

    jhlipton - still, when they tossed the lovely and gracious Lillian Cameron into that tank her wrists should have been bound behind and the top not sealed - would have allowed those guys to chat a bit longer.

    Stay well all

    Monday, October 31st 2011 - 10:25:47 AM

    Name: Jane von Detlefson
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Heroone - Great anecdote! Worthy of a movie that one. Two travelers try to crash a real dungeon in Europe and are punished for it. Pretty cool. Of course in the movie, they would get more than a few lashes... at least in my movie. And thank you for the compliments on my acting. Sometimes I do end up being whipped for real in a movie, and of course it hurts, but I also have to act, not just re-act. When JJ and I sat down to watch Maleficarum, there were many many ouch moments where I felt a simultaneous empathy for myself on the screen and a flashback of what it actually felt like. Kind of weird, that combination.

    Wallym - Thank you for your compliments. It's nice to be appreciated! And because you said please, we'll make more movies like this one.

    Sloth - As much as I would like to personally deliver all of the orders we have received, alas, it seems that I'll be busy working... on more movies! At least my time is well spent.

    DOWNLOADS UPDATE: Both the company and I have gotten a lot of emails since the first download went up asking when the others will be available, so here's an update: The European download (PAL) (Windows) has had a delay due to the content delivery network, but they tell me it will be up tomorrow. The English Mac OS download will be up after that and the German Mac download will follow that one. We're really sorry for the delays, but better that there are no glitches in the system, right? I'll update when I know more about specific times.

    On the Crux Foundation forum, someone wrote a really nice review:

    Just finished watching "Maleficarum", and I must say that I'm very impressed with the work. The burning at the stake at the end is one of the best ever done, even for more mainstream films. The effects and the acting were superb!

    If you're a fan of:

    1) flogging
    2) strappado
    3) the rack
    4) the Spanish Horse
    5) more flogging
    6) piercing with a blade
    7) slow-roasting on a spit
    8) more flogging
    9) branding
    10) crucifixion
    11) burning at the stake
    12) a hint of lesbian love-making won't be disappointed!

    Lighting is very well done, and I'm glad to see the use of FX blood is decreased. Too many times RF has a tendency to reach for the bottle of red. There's enough there to get the message across, without making it look like a bad car accident. There were some sound issues for the non-torture scenes, where the introductory story dialogue goes from studio-sound to "on the set" sound. But other than that, everything works.

    If I had to give one critique, I'd say the interruption of the sequence of tortures by background testimony of eyewitnesses could be condensed and played at the beginning, before the tortures begin. But, this is my opinion, and I prefer more linear storytelling. I also didn't like the displaying of credits in the middle of the screen at the beginning. They were a bit intrusive to the introductory dialogue with the actors.

    Hopefully the revenue from this movie will be enough to get another one in progress. Maybe next time, the accused really is a witch and casts a spell over the Inquisitor!

    Monday, October 31st 2011 - 01:25:53 PM

    Name: wallym
    E-mail address:

    Thank you Jane for your comment. I really did enjoy the movie. Sorry I spelled Maleficarum wrong. I enjoy watching all your films. You really make them believable. This is now my favourite movie with you in it. I also really enjoyed The Via Crux of Jane both of them. Amazing whippings. Thanks again for these excellent movies and keep getting lashed.


    Monday, October 31st 2011 - 03:56:32 PM

    Name: Rack 'Em Up
    E-mail address:

    Greetings, fellow GIMPers!

    First of all, I would like to apologize for being "on the outside looking in" for WAY too long. I have lurked around this site for about 6 YEARS, so it's about time I post! Like most lurkers, I guess I didn't feel I had anything to contribute, which is foolish. But, I am glad to be here! This is an AMAZING site, and I look forward to reading the newest posts, and seeing the latest polls.

    I do have one, small contribution to make at the moment. I happen to have TWO (legal, legitimate, of course) copies of ZFX's South of the Border 4: Atrocities. I purchased one years ago. And, I also found a copy in a box that belonged to my former roommate. (I somehow ended up with some of his items when I moved.) Anyway, I contacted him, and he actually does not want his copy back (which is absurd, if you ask me). So, even though I think this is one of Rick Masters' best works, I do not need TWO copies. So, here is my offer: I am willing to send my extra copy to a GIMPer on this site, at no charge. My only condition is that it be sent to a U.S. address, so I don't have to worry about customs, etc. (Sorry, A Canadian!) If interested, please contact me at the e-mail above. And please understand, I only have one extra copy, so this will be first come, first serve. (Unless of course, Ralphus can think of some sort of contest or something for it.)

    Thanks for bearing with my somewhat long, introductory post. I hope to keep posting in the future!

    Monday, October 31st 2011 - 06:42:03 PM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    Rack 'Em Up wrote:

    My only condition is that it be sent to a U.S. address, so I don't have to worry about customs, etc. (Sorry, A Canadian!)

    No worries. When it comes to the movie that is arguably Lisa's best work, it's safe to assume I already own a copy.

    Monday, October 31st 2011 - 06:49:09 PM

    Previous - September 2011

    Next - November 2011