Tortured women

[Arcas]

I'm up for it.

OK. This one If you're game). I think it should be able to handle it and it's pretty unusual for me (no dark warehouses). This was inspired by a fuzzy memory of a book cover I saw on the stands back in the late 70's.

[xs70]

Well, that puts a different spin on the phrase "taking her for a spin".

Ok, I'll see myself out now. Will see what I can do.

[thx1139a]

I'm up for it.

OK. This one If you're game). I think it should be able to handle it and it's pretty unusual for me (no dark warehouses). This was inspired by a fuzzy memory of a book cover I saw on the stands back in the late 70's.

Hey now... that weight imbalance would be the same as a prop strike if that engine starts and trigger an (expensive) engine overhaul by default... and the reason for it would be difficult to explain to the local FSDO...

[petelobo]

https://motherless.com/1A94C9A

[xs70]

OK. This one If you're game). I think it should be able to handle it and it's pretty unusual for me (no dark warehouses). This was inspired by a fuzzy memory of a book cover I saw on the stands back in the late 70's.

[Arcas]

spin.jpg

WOAH! Pretty cool. And I really like her improved face. What did you think? Game for another? I'd love it if you chose something.... plus you'd have a better idea of what the A.I. is capable of chewing on to get best results. It seems like a lot of "hardware" stuff (clamps, skewers. prods) may just confuse it and give use strange manifestations.

Thanks for trying this one! Again, NEAT! I'm currently testing the limits of Bloom to see what it'll let me do. The downside of Bloom is that it seems remarkably ignorant on issues of nipples and nether regions. In any case, my results with Bloom have always been composites of various outputs.

[xs70]

It seems like a lot of "hardware" stuff (clamps, skewers. prods) may just confuse it and give use strange manifestations.

Yes, but therein lies the challenge. Making it work anyway.

In any case, my results with Bloom have always been composites of various outputs.

I don't think there's another way to make high quality AI images. Generate rapidly and composit what looks good until the entire image looks good. At least not GIMP art; or anything else the models aren't specifically trained to produce. That last picture consists of about 400 outputs I generated in a couple of hours using 3 different model families for their relative strengths: Qwen, ZImage, Illustrious. Some images I've gone up to 1000 outputs before I felt the result was good enough.

What did you think? Game for another? I'd love it if you chose something

I'll try to tackle the speech impediment image. It's too good to pass up on.

[Arcas]

This is my work using Bloom on my Ripper image. As I said earlier, it's a composite of both the original and a collection of Bloom enhancement outputs. It appears that if Bloom has a censor, it's pretty liberal.

[wulf]

I'm kinda happy with how these turned out. Excellent base material.

WOW! Those are COOL! Thanks for trying them out. I like the first one, but hey... it's closer to the source material so I'm biased. Want me to dig out another candidtae?

I'm up for it.

As a collector, I suggest leaving Arcas's name on them as you did, but also add your signature, or indicate it's AI and in some way who created it (with Arcas's permission of course).

"I am Arcas and I approve of this message."

The only problem is, I don't have a signature.

Any suggestions?

Just use XS 70 AI, or AI by xs70 ... something like that.

You're creating images and we the viewers need to know who you are.

[thx1139a]

Created and posted with the approval of Arcas
video (link good for 30 days): https://ufile.io/loz9j59v