The perils of Jennifer

[Jarpi]

.

[Jarpi]

.

[Steeltoiz]

I was very nice they number the area first. Jennifer looks great!!

[wulf]

.

Jen's painful path to Bdsm stardom. Oh the possibilities.

[BlirGimp]

.

These line images are very popular drawing thousands of views. In my opinion, they would be better done rendered using one of the common CGI programs, like Poser or DAZ.

Here's my render/interpretation of image 916 (without the crowd or speech balloons). Pretty basic render and composition. Took less than an hour to produce. Jennifer with her master taking her from a holding cell. She's wearing an obedience collar that's controlled by a remote control her master holds.

[Jarpi]

.

[doe.1971]

In my opinion, they would be better done rendered using one of the common CGI programs, like Poser or DAZ.

Possible but there's a certain charm in the Jarpi's touch. Like watching a cubist artist, you're not looking for the life-like qualities but for smth else ...

[BobDarkroom]

In my opinion, they would be better done rendered using one of the common CGI programs, like Poser or DAZ.

Possible but there's a certain charm in the Jarpi's touch. Like watching a cubist artist, you're not looking for the life-like qualities but for smth else ...

I totally agree with doe.1971!
Jarpi's style is very specific and he has a lot of fans here who enjoy the hundreds of drawings about "The perils of Jennifer" the way Jarpi draws them.
No offense but as far as I'm concerned there's no need for 3D renderings based on Jarpi's drawings.

[cluseb]

In my opinion, they would be better done rendered using one of the common CGI programs, like Poser or DAZ.

Possible but there's a certain charm in the Jarpi's touch. Like watching a cubist artist, you're not looking for the life-like qualities but for smth else ...

Jarpi & Jennifer have garnered over a million and half views in this topic alone, In my opinion he's got it just right, don't tinker with success.

[BlirGimp]

Think of it like the questions your optometrist asks. Better one? ...

Better two? ...