Wooden horse: with or without...

[LLL]

(...)
Yes, I think that dildo will make it unbearably painful and that there is a reason dildos were never added to these devices in history. I doubt that nobody else was not thinking in that direction.

(...)

(...) I guess that (all things being equal) adding a dildo to the wooden horse will make it more unpleasant to the female rider in most situations if choosen big enough and made of rigid material (wood or metal). (...)

Many thanks to all those who answered. General consensus seems to be that adding a wooden phallus makes riding the horse more painful. This however raises the question why it was not used more often in real, historical questioning. I don't think an inquisitor would be worried about the experience being TOO painful for a suspected witch...

[letvor]

If you don't have anything against it, I would love to add one more thing to this topic.

There is one torturing device that is very similar to a wooden horse, but it is less known.
I'm talking about Judas cradle.

The Judas Cradle, a terrible medieval torture where the victim would be placed on top of a pyramid-like seat. The victim's feet were tied to each other in a way that moving one leg would force the other to move as well - increasing pain.
The triangular-shaped end of the judas cradle was inserted in the victim's anus or vagina. This torture could last, depending on some factors discussed below, anywhere from a few hours to complete days.

This device obviously can not be used in porn, but I felt the need to mention it.

What are you thinking about body orifice torturing devices? And would it be OK to add them too to this subject? Maybe to compare medieval devices to the one that is used in porn?

[LLL]

If you don't have anything against it, I would love to add one more thing to this topic.

There is one torturing device that is very similar to a wooden horse, but it is less known.
I'm talking about Judas cradle.

The Judas Cradle, a terrible medieval torture where the victim would be placed on top of a pyramid-like seat. The victim's feet were tied to each other in a way that moving one leg would force the other to move as well - increasing pain.
The triangular-shaped end of the judas cradle was inserted in the victim's anus or vagina. This torture could last, depending on some factors discussed below, anywhere from a few hours to complete days.

This device obviously can not be used in porn, but I felt the need to mention it.

What are you thinking about body orifice torturing devices? And would it be OK to add them too to this subject? Maybe to compare medieval devices to the one that is used in porn?

Of course it's OK. Go ahead.

[LLL]

I just remembered a further possible iteration, in a series alas never completed by Phantast: the electrified wooden horse plus oral training dildo!

[carlienet]

What a devilish idea, Miss Belle. I am looking forward and for sure will buy!

[MasterKav]

I've never used one but they look good. Maybe in a future film.

I wait in anticipation

[Edukator]

Since this topic is broadening,

Good use of the cunt training chair:

[Edukator]

And standing cunt impalement can be fun too:

[Edukator]

(...)
Yes, I think that dildo will make it unbearably painful and that there is a reason dildos were never added to these devices in history. I doubt that nobody else was not thinking in that direction.

(...)

(...) I guess that (all things being equal) adding a dildo to the wooden horse will make it more unpleasant to the female rider in most situations if choosen big enough and made of rigid material (wood or metal). (...)

Many thanks to all those who answered. General consensus seems to be that adding a wooden phallus makes riding the horse more painful. This however raises the question why it was not used more often in real, historical questioning. I don't think an inquisitor would be worried about the experience being TOO painful for a suspected witch...

Very likely because for obvious reasons torture devices used by inquisitors were NOT sexually oriented and they already had many simpler effective torture devices without the need to resort to such "refinements".
But it's only my guess, I wasn't there of course.

But the challenge is still open: who will build (and use !) the first real dildo fitted wooden horse ?

The second challenge would be to find a woman willing to ride it for a couple of hours...

If someone here manages to meet both the above challenges he would be nice to keep us informed about the results.

[LLL]

(...)
Yes, I think that dildo will make it unbearably painful and that there is a reason dildos were never added to these devices in history. I doubt that nobody else was not thinking in that direction.

(...)

(...) I guess that (all things being equal) adding a dildo to the wooden horse will make it more unpleasant to the female rider in most situations if choosen big enough and made of rigid material (wood or metal). (...)

Many thanks to all those who answered. General consensus seems to be that adding a wooden phallus makes riding the horse more painful. This however raises the question why it was not used more often in real, historical questioning. I don't think an inquisitor would be worried about the experience being TOO painful for a suspected witch...

Very likely because for obvious reasons torture devices used by inquisitors were NOT sexually oriented and they already had many simpler effective torture devices without the need to resort to such "refinements".
But it's only my guess, I wasn't there of course.

But the challenge is still open: who will build (and use !) the first real dildo fitted wooden horse ?

The second challenge would be to find a woman willing to ride it for a couple of hours...

If someone here manages to meet both the above challenges he would be nice to keep us informed about the results.

Better yet, he would be nice to invite us all to witness the event