Electro Torture

[hornythumb]

Great posts guys. I haven't posted anything as yet because I'm a little unsure of the posting limits. I understood that there would be size and number of posts limits, but there's already been 15 or so images posted at one time. So waiting to see some clarification.

I also wonder about the current posting limits.
The limit of 3 pictures (max 2Mb) per post and per thread is still active because it's not possible to attach more than 3 files to a post.
However, I thought there was also a limit of max. 1 post per thread per day but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore as I see regularly multiple posts in a thread on the same day by the same member.
So, I guess the only remaining limit is 3 attachments of max. 2Mb per post.

Hey Bobd, a few guys post several sets of three per day, while I post much less. It sort of evens out. At least I hope it does.

[yyy02]

Great posts guys. I haven't posted anything as yet because I'm a little unsure of the posting limits...

I also wonder about the current posting limits.
...

Hey Bobd, a few guys post several sets of three per day, while I post much less. It sort of evens out. At least I hope it does.

I honestly believe if we were bumping up against limitations La Reine Margot would never have raised the limit to 2 MB/image (essentially double the previous limit).

Not that I encourage wholesale dumping of images onto the site, but just that I think we're in a much better place now (Thanks Margot and Ralphus).

[bakerboy]

Convincing someone to cooperate

clip and gallery https://www.boundheat.com/gallery/emera ... epdaughter

[hornythumb]

I also wonder about the current posting limits.
...

Hey Bobd, a few guys post several sets of three per day, while I post much less. It sort of evens out. At least I hope it does.

I honestly believe if we were bumping up against limitations La Reine Margot would never have raised the limit to 2 MB/image (essentially double the previous limit).

Not that I encourage wholesale dumping of images onto the site, but just that I think we're in a much better place now (Thanks Margot and Ralphus).

Good points, especially about trying to post only high quality material. I think we try, but still I occasionally put up clunkers.

[BobDarkroom]

...

I honestly believe if we were bumping up against limitations La Reine Margot would never have raised the limit to 2 MB/image (essentially double the previous limit).

I didn't suggest we might be bumping up against limitations, I was just trying to figure out if my understanding of the current posting limits is correct.

[cluseb]

Great posts guys. I haven't posted anything as yet because I'm a little unsure of the posting limits. I understood that there would be size and number of posts limits, but there's already been 15 or so images posted at one time. So waiting to see some clarification.

I also wonder about the current posting limits.
The limit of 3 pictures (max 2Mb) per post and per thread is still active because it's not possible to attach more than 3 files to a post.
However, I thought there was also a limit of max. 1 post per thread per day but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore as I see regularly multiple posts in a thread on the same day by the same member.
So, I guess the only remaining limit is 3 attachments of max. 2Mb per post.

Hey Bobd, a few guys post several sets of three per day, while I post much less. It sort of evens out. At least I hope it does.

I believe purpose of the three attachments per post is to limit the number per page to thirty, the more attachments per page the longer the page takes to load, and I've noticed the new higher capacity system is slower to load.
If I use the image command on an address on this server it sometimes takes a while to load, but if I'm using an address from a third party host it loads almost instantaneously. The trade-off for no fees or ads.

[Edukator]

I believe purpose of the three attachments per post is to limit the number per page to thirty, the more attachments per page the longer the page takes to load, and I've noticed the new higher capacity system is slower to load.
If I use the image command on an address on this server it sometimes takes a while to load, but if I'm using an address from a third party host it loads almost instantaneously. The trade-off for no fees or ads.

You can stay within the 3 attachments per post / 2 Mb limits and display more than three pictures if you create small panoramas (attached pictures), each panorama counting for 1 (picture) attachment. I usually use two pics per attachment which is a good size/resolution compromise, but three (or more) are also possible if you accept some resolution degradation. This way I don't use too much server space and avoid multiple posts. If you left click on the pic it will open in full size and you'll notice the quality is still quite acceptable.


See below:

SINGLE PIC:

TWO PIC's PANORAMA

THREE PIC's PANORAMA

[hornythumb]

I also wonder about the current posting limits.
The limit of 3 pictures (max 2Mb) per post and per thread is still active because it's not possible to attach more than 3 files to a post.
However, I thought there was also a limit of max. 1 post per thread per day but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore as I see regularly multiple posts in a thread on the same day by the same member.
So, I guess the only remaining limit is 3 attachments of max. 2Mb per post.

Hey Bobd, a few guys post several sets of three per day, while I post much less. It sort of evens out. At least I hope it does.

I believe purpose of the three attachments per post is to limit the number per page to thirty, the more attachments per page the longer the page takes to load, and I've noticed the new higher capacity system is slower to load.
If I use the image command on an address on this server it sometimes takes a while to load, but if I'm using an address from a third party host it loads almost instantaneously. The trade-off for no fees or ads.

Wow, I hadn't even thought about that . Educ has a nice strategy to maximize content with reduced size.

[midlander]

FR2_05.25j.jpgFR2_06.02j.jpg


A big, sexy girl is naked, strapped to a chair and electrotortured.
She is an informant for the police and has been outed and kidnapped. Her torture and eventual execution is for the enjoyment of the mob boss, who is enjoying her ordeal remotely, via streaming to the ultra large screen TV, wall mounted in his bedroom.
The view of him, naked and enjoying a blowjob from the girls lesbian lover, handcuffed with her hands behind her, is on the monitor in front of the tortured girl.

Fear Researchers, Cruel World, a revisit.

Brilliant stuff and, I agree, a great backstory narrative.

I love scenarios where a woman working undercover (informant, undercover agent or cop, etc) is outed and spirited away to pay the price with no hope of rescue.
For me it always works better if there is a theme of betrayal - having ditched her former lesbian lover who knows all about her informing she then ends up betrayed by her and ends up at the mercy of the mob boss along with her new lover.
I love the idea of the boss in his luxurious mansion enjoying watching her ordeal from the comfort of his bedroom - he is accompanied by her former lover who encourages his henchman to torture her mercilessly!

I love the simple restraints - the thin black straps securing her to the chair, her ankles pulled painfully back and her thighs spread wide apart. I love the way she's initially slumped forward, looking in despair at the clips attached to her nipples, awaiting the juice. And then her body jerked forward, her feet pressing against the floor, thrusting her forward as the juice hits her!
Through her screams she can hear her former lover laughing with pleasure at her ordeal!

[yyy02]

...THREE PIC's PANORAMA

Elec.504.jpg

Can never get enough of 912!!

...For me it always works better if there is a theme of betrayal ...

I love the simple restraints - the thin black straps securing her to the chair, her ankles pulled painfully back and her thighs spread wide apart...

Cue Barry White: Ohh yeahhh ....