As far as the poll, I'm sure money plays a big part. Being an exhibitionist, feeling ok about strangers seeing your body as well as just being hot looking plays into it too. Maybe having a thing for being tied up is most important.

I hope that this year will be a little more less worrisome, at least for me so I can get back to buying some more great gimp vids!!Well I've said enough for now.

Ralphus you keep up the good work of trying to keep this mess of a forum running. Also to everyone else who's postings are always interesting plus being very informative for the rest of us who dont like playing guessing games with which vid might be worthwhile or not. For now take care everyone.

Rich

Sometime either this evening or on the weekend, I'm going to test the converted files I have created to see if I can upload to YouTied without requiring MasterDetective to encode my clips at his end.

I hope it works.

I guess if I had made a New Year's resolution to stop pissing off Bondage Dave and Hobra, it would already be shot. Lucky for me, I didn't make any type of resolution in that regard.

Well Happy New Year Everyone!

So first off, I'd like to apologize for some of the chaos surrounding YouTied recently.

The basic problem w/ keeping YouTied online is that it can be EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE, in terms of bandwidth. The site is very popular, and as you can imagine consumes a pretty huge chunk of bandwidth, and the bills add up quickly. Sometimes I get behind the bills, the economy being what it is, and .. well .. until I get caught up, the site goes offline.

At least, that's been the case up till now.

Going forward, I'm going to be making some changes, to hopefully make the experience more smooth for all involved.

So the good news is that in the short term, YouTied is back

And the other good news is that in the long term, YouTied is back .. as I've been giving some serious thought as to how to come up w/ workable business models that will bring in enough revenue to cover the bandwidth costs and keep it online. I won't go into much detail here and now (for the sake of not boring.. and, well, to keep the new features a surprise!), but suffice to say that on the Web, Community is King (video even this forum here). The features you currently have on YouTied will always be there and always be free, but I'll be adding newer, more compelling features (possibly w/ a subscription fee) and I've come up w/ some new advertising models that I think are compelling, non-invasive for the site visitor, and which should help cover the cost of running the site.

So that's all the good news.

The bad news is that in the medium term, so as to save money, I may have to take YouTied offline again for a month or so while I work these new features and new revenue models into being. But this time, I'll be sure and give you advance notice of if and when that's going to happen.

Finally, if anyone has their own ideas for how to generate revenue on the site, don't be shy! :-) I'm open to new ideas, and indeed to the possibility of business partnerships, etc, w/ the right parties.

So again, sorry for the confusion and happy new year everyone!

Thank you to Brutus for providing me with the information on how to encode the videos at my end, and to Scheer who had originally provided the information. Now, I guess I should get on with the business of loading the rest of the clips from this movie.

Anyway, Thanks for the site.

BTW, does it help if we click on the banner ads periodically? I know that excessive clicking would be bad (ie clicking the same banner more than once in one session) but I assume you will get revenue from any clicks.

I have had the clip removed, as I have discovered I am having audio problems when I convert (at my end). I am working to see if I can resolve this.

Chas, there were advertisers I had on the site previously where clicking on the banners would have helped generate revenue, but I'm not using such advertisers currently. All the ones up there right now are either affiliates (where you'd have to both click AND buy something on that target site) or they pay a flat-rate monthly fee, regardless of clicks.

Even for those advertisers I had previously where clicking on the banners would have generated revenue, such revenue would have been too meager to make a serious contribution to revenue.

One of the things I'm going to be working on in the coming weeks is to completely revamp the advertising model, thanks in part to some suggestions from Steve Power, over at PowerShotz. The new advertising model will feature prominent rich-media ads, and due to the way they will be delivered to the user, I should be able to charge amount for running them. The trick then will be to either (a) get my own network of advertising affiliates; or (b) find an existing ad network that supports such rich-media ads (this is a very NEW advertising technology, and although I've seen it used on some Web sites, I'm not sure there are big ad networks out there that support this style of ad delivery).

But thanks for your suggestion!

The clips include the trailer for Goddess of Hell, which I reviewed last week.

I posted the best clips from the Ladron de Corazones bondage/torture scene I tracked down a few weeks back.

Of course Brian's Page was helpful:

Female cop Verónica (Rojas) has fallen into the clutches of the bad guys who take her to their hideout and handcuff her to an upright standing metal frame, hands above her head. Damsel is also blindfolded with a white cloth during a visit from number one villain. Later she is given electric shocks. When she passes out, her captors (wrongly) believe her to be dead and dump her somewhere in the countryside.

The response I received basically did not answer my questions about Brutal Violence, but mentioned that SubSpaceLand was receiving regular updates. Well, okay, in for a penny, in for a pound. I joined SubSpaceLand as well. (Hereinafter referred to as SSL.)

During my one-month membership in SSL, there were only two weekly updates. It is my considered opinion, based on my personal experiences with both Brutal Violence and SSL, that Class Media, the umbrella company for both of these web sites (and several more), places little emphasis on delivering weekly updates on a regular basis. Since weekly updates are what I expect from a membership, I would have a hard time recommending to anyone paying 34.95EUR (48.38USD right now) for this web site.

There are 16 pages of updates, with five updates per page. Each update features a downloadable video and an image gallery. The downloadable video is broken into two, three, or four parts. The images are large and high quality. The photography and videography both demonstrate high production values. The videos are WMV and/or RM files.

The style is, umm, unique. The SSL features are best described as "artsy." The dom is "Marcellino," who has a slight build and a weak chin and an artistic approach to BDSM that involves music, mood lighting, and long lingering video views of inactivity. When there is action, it is exaggerated and ostentatious. He likes to kiss his models a lot. Basically, there is very little fire in most of his features. If you like watching pretty girls in consensual bondage to the accompaniment of New Age music and with mood lighting, this is your web site. There is very brief sex, generally explicit, and usually Marcellino ejaculates in the model's mouth. (I notice he never kisses them after that.)

This is obviously the character of the SSL web site, and I expect future updates will conform to this style. The tag lines advertise "Sensual BDSM" and "BDSM As It Should Be." In the first instance, I'm not sure "sensual" is the sensation I am looking for in BDSM, although admittedly it does describe the style fairly accurately. In the second instance, I flatly disagree. Completely tame and consensual BDSM with an artsy-fartsy trim. I would characterize SSL as "Pretentious, Ostentatious, and Affected BDSM-like Stuff."

None of the SSL updates really stood out for me, so I'll review the last of the only two updates during my one-month membership, entitled Deeply Touched.

-----

Deeply Touched (SubSpaceLand video feature)

We begin, as most of the SubSpaceLand features do, in a darkened room, with moody New Age music wafting through the initially black-and-white scene. The title shows up and, in a nice touch, the names of the players (in this case Aliz and Marcellino) are also displayed. Color oozes into the picture. Aliz is hanging upside down with her ankles fastened apart using a spreader bar and her wrists bound behind her back. She is fully clothed, in a short-sleeved silvery blouse and dark slacks. No shoes. No gag. There are candles burning in floor-standing candelabras and the predominant moody color for this feature is blue. The scene is dark. Too fucking dark, to my way of thinking.

Now see, this is what I am talking about. Our camera view of upside-down Aliz is from the wrong side of a candelabra, which makes for an artsy image but is annoying as hell. And another thing. They turn the camera sideways, so that Aliz is hanging, you know, horizontally. I guess this is supposed to be clever or inventive or creative as well. Fail.

So Marcellino saunters into the scene while it is sideways and gives Aliz a little spin one way, then watches as she unwinds in the other direction. Then he kneels down and puts his face right in her face and as the music swells he... kisses her. When this guy kisses he acts like he is sacrificing a virgin. I mean, it is a Big Deal to him. And he kisses A LOT. He must have a kissing fetish or something. If you watch one of these you will know what I mean. It is not exciting in the least.

Then he runs his hand down (or up, since she is upside down) her into her blouse and squeezes her incredibly full and round breast. Then he stands up and CSI-like the action speeds up as he whips her around 30 degrees or so. Ooh how cool. The video editor must be so proud.

Marcellino opens her blouse with one hand and takes so long I am almost to the point of screaming at the screen for him to USE BOTH FUCKING HANDS, but he finally gets it done. The model, meanwhile, also looked up, no doubt wondering what was taking so long. We are a minute and a half into the first 10-minute segment, and Marcellino has already gotten on my nerves, but I will dial back the snarkiness now. (Well, as much as I can.)

Marcellino caresses her breasts and then squeezes them and then kneads them roughly. More CSI-like fast motion whooshes as he spins her around to grope her from other angles. (There's a whooshing sound effect as well.) He spanks her slacks-clad butt. The lights briefly flare enough that we can actually SEE what is going on, but dim immediately. Marcellino kneels down and goes in for another kiss (but lingers in a threatening way with his thin, bloodless lips less than an inch from hers instead) and all I am really seeing is that his male pattern baldness is getting serious. He should consider wearing a watch cap like other male porn actors with receding and/or evaporating hairlines.

More spanking her (clothed) legs and butt. More lifting her up and, yes, this time actually kissing her after a needless and ineffectively dramatic pause.

This model, by the way, is gorgeous. She has an absolutely incredible body, and looks stunning hanging upside down with her bare breasts exposed and her long, shapely (and sadly, still clothed) legs spread apart. Even in the dark, I can tell she's a total babe.

Suddenly the scene shifts and Aliz is now bound on the floor with her arms pulled apart down at her sides at a 45-degree angle, then her legs pulled over her head and her ankles fastened to the floor with her ass in the air. She is absolutely, gloriously, stark naked. She definitely has a to-die-for body. The scene is pregnant with promise until the camera starts with the jerky motions and we go into fuzzy black and white special video effects for a close-up of her pussy.

Marcellino is standing over her, flogger in hand, and whips her pussy and ass. She jumps and struggles as he punishes her, and the cameraman slips up and gives us a few clear shots of her face as she grimaces as well. I was waiting for the special effect I just knew was coming and sure enough, we get about three slo-mo whip impacts on her pussy and the slo-mo sound she makes as a result.

Next, Marcellino takes a small plunger and inserts it into her pussy and squirts something into her. The camera does a CSI-like jerking whoosh again, which looks suspiciously like the cameraman stumbled and they just sped it all up to make it look like they did it on purpose. Marcellino leaves the plunger sticking out of her, and the camera focuses expectantly on it for long enough that I am wondering if she's supposed to squirt it back out and up into the air or something.

But no, Marcellino returns with a really wicked-looking device that I would like to get hold of and try out on someone. It looks like a bulb plug, but it can be screwed open like the nose of that SPECTRE spacecraft that swallowed the US space capsule at the beginning of You Only Live Twice. It is pretty cool. He demonstrates that it can be closed for insertion, then opened inside any orifice into which it is inserted. In this case, Aliz's pussy. So I guess the plunger was full of lubricant.

So he pushes it in--and sadly the penetration isn't painful enough to elicit a response from Aliz--then Marcellino screws it open. As he screws it open, we do get some gasps and moans from the deliciously naked and vulnerable Aliz. The scenes where Aliz is fastened to the floor and used and abused are the high points of the entire video, by the way. They are nice. As Marcellino screws it open even wider, and Aliz continues to moan and grunt (in a feminine manner), the background music swells and it is the Smashing Pumpkins' The Beginning is the End is the Beginning, which you might recall from Batman and Robin (which sucked) or from the Internet movie trailer for the upcoming movie, Watchmen (which I expect to be awesome).

Anyway, back to Marcellino and Aliz, in whose pussy the wicked device looks to be fully spread. After a briefly annoying fuzzy black and white transition, we get back to Marcellino using a pink "Hello Kitty" vibrator on Aliz, still in the same position, still with that device expanded inside her. She is moaning and groaning and obviously being well-stimulated by the vibrator. Personally, I would have liked to see her brought to a screaming forced orgasm here, but this is SubSpaceLand, so instead we get a half-fade dissolve effect where her face and her pussy are both kind of superimposed over each other and a slo-mo echo-chamber "oh-oh-oh-ohhhhhhhhhh" for a bit, then back to real-time as she moans and quivers some more, and just as she looks to be achieving orgasm we slow to a stop and fade to black and white fuzzy again.

Totally unsatisfying.

Marcellino unties her ankles and pulls her legs back down and ties them to the floor so that she is flat on her back. The expanded device is still inside her and she arches her body deliciously as the music swells and this time it is the hard rock The End is the Beginning is the End, which goes on for a while as the scene fades to black and white and it is the end of Part One. Whew.

Part Two begins with the beautiful and hot-bodied Aliz still fastened to the floor on her back as Marcellino pulls on the expanding-pussy device enough to get her to gasp and cry out. Then he gets up and leans down in her face and just kind of hovers there dramatically and then, yes, he kisses her. Again.

He squeezes her breasts roughly, slaps her pussy, squeezes her breasts some more, slaps her pussy some more. The Smashing Pumkpins make a noisy reappearance (the hard rock version again) and then suddenly it goes quiet. Marcellino is still squeezing and slapping, but without a rock soundtrack. Then the music starts up again. Then it suddenly stops again. What. The. Fuck.

Transition to fuzzy black and white and a close-up of Aliz's left nostril. I have to say, if I was going to zoom in on some part of the lovely Aliz's body, the left nostril would have been pretty far down on my list. More "Sensual BDSM," I suppose.

Back to full color. Aliz is still shackled to the floor, naked and spread, and Marcellino whips her body. She arches and gasps and cries out nicely during this whipping. He whips her pussy over and over again as the Smashing Pumpkins blare, then it goes silent. I admit I just do not get the sound guy's point. It is now irritating in the extreme. Marcellino stands over Aliz and continues to flog her crotch. She writhes in pain and gasps and cries out, and she looks and sounds sensational doing it. Marcellino whips her tits. He whips her legs and thighs. He pulls on the pussy thing again and we fade into the next scene.

Aliz is bound standing, AOH (and apart) with legs spread. Her luscious body is on full display. Oh my god this gal is hot.

Marcellino whips her backside. He walks around in front and hovers his face in hers again but doesn't kiss her. He reaches down and we see the pussy device is still in place. He screws it some more, and pulls on it. More slo-mo. More Smashing Pumpkins (the slower version this time). More backside whipping.

Sudden CSI-like fast-forward jerky motion transition and Aliz is bound with her back against a horizontal bar with one leg extended out to the side and her arms bound behind her as Marcellino, who is standing behind her, squeezes and gropes her tits. He walks around front and we see that the pussy device is gone. I would have liked to watch that extraction, but it is apparent to me that what I like and what Marcellino likes are diametrically opposed.

Marcellino attaches clothes pins to Aliz's nipples and pussy lips. Then (*sigh*) he gets in her face and kisses her again. He flogs her. He pulls her hair. He slaps her body with his open hand. He removes the clothes pins.

Fade to Aliz on her knees, viewed in an artsy-fartsy fashion through the lit candles of a candelabra. Next, she's sucking on Marcellino's cock. He may or may not have come in her mouth. (It is dark and it looked suspiciously like a pool of saliva on her tongue to me.) Fade out.

So, what was good, in a nutshell: The model was hot, with a body that would not quit. Half of the positions in which she was bound were excellent. The punishment (whipping, slapping, clothespins) was pretty good. That pussy-expanding device looked cosmic. I wonder where I can get one of those? Probably easier to acquire than to persuade someone to let me try it out. Oh well. The model's reactions were good. This could have been incredible.

What was bad: The entire scene was way too dark. Whether that was an "artistic choice" or whether the cameraman fucked up is indeterminate. (They are not always this dark, although by and large I do think they are purposely dark to "enhance" the "mood.") Too many unnecessary and ridiculous special effects. The CSI-like fast-forwards, NYPD Blue-like jerky motions and black-and-white grainy fades were ludicrous. And finally, there was the jarring soundtrack, applied in a sophomoric manner. (And I actually like that song.)

And the Number One Bad Thing: Marcellino. His ideas of dramatic posturing look like outtakes from a Madonna Vogue music video, with the operative descriptive being a to-the-death battle between "pretentious" and "ostentatious." The guy just does not look threatening, with his male pattern balding and weak chin and thin lips. He looks... petulant. Petulant doms don't do it for me.

In summary, Deeply Touched gets a C, all on the strength of a fantastically hot model, her nice moans and groans, and that neat pussy expanding device.

I would like to make one correction. You say that I LOVE putting myself in the role of victim. Well, I don't really love it. It just seems to happen to me, I'm not sure why. But hopefully in the new year it won't... Excuse me, I have to answer the door.

what was i saying in my last post? i can't remember. have to work on trying to free myself. wish me luck.

gabriela

p.s. if you happen to be going by my apartment, could you please stop in and loosen the ropes on my elbows?

Gabriela... I just LOVE reading your posts... LOL

----------

John Galt: Boy, it sounds like those SSL videos that you reviewed (in highly entertaining fashion) could've been really good without all those stupid special effects. I guess some people may like that sort of thing, but I agree with you: They're just annoying and unnecessary distractions.

----------

Gabriela Atar: I second the motion that you are the coolest female poster on this site. As always, it's a great pleasure reading your posts.

What sickens me, beside the crime committed, is that we are regressing quickly with common sense. Because a small percentage of idiots abuse and misuse things like adult entertainment, guns, alchohol, food, drugs etc. etc. the rest of us are losing our rights. Gee...it used to be smarter years ago that you couldn't penalize all for what a few do....no longer..unless we rise up.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1104523/Protesters-say-right-watch-sadistic-porn-Tell-mother-girl-murdered-man-addicted-.html

I really hate the political stuff that leaks onto this page because I am someone who believes anyone who really believes one political party here in the states is better than another is fooling themselves. Once the door is closed, they are all in on it.

And, I certainly do NOT feel the new democrat administration coming in somehow gives us adults who enjoy adult entertainment more respect and protection at all. In fact, I think we're about to face more censorship and taking away of rights as we move on regardless of party.

My own view is quite straightforward and I suspect shared by many people here. I'm a strong believer in individual rights. In my view, the state has no business interfering in the activities of consenting adults if no one is being harmed by those activities. I don't care whether others find it offensive -- if the activity isn't harming anyone, then it's not a legal issue.

At the same time, I also believe in individual responsibilities. Any sane person who commits a horrible crime is responsible for his/her actions. I have no time for people who claim they couldn't help themselves because they had listened to a Marilyn Manson CD or watched an Oliver Stone movie. Sorry, you are responsible for your own actions -- go directly to jail.

You make some good points about President-Elect Obama. it will be interesting to see whether American freedoms are advanced under his administration.

-----

John Galt: Thanks for the very amusing review of Deeply Touched. I'm glad it was you who watched this movie and not me. I may be a rube but I have no time for the artsy CSI and NYPD Blue touches. It's sad, though, when an attractive woman agrees to do a BDSM movie and the producers screw it up.

-----

So far, this looks like a good time to be posting on YouTied, as I haven't seen any sign of the One-star Weinies, Bondage Dave and Hobra. It looks like either they aren't aware that YouTied is back up or perhaps they don't care. I suspect the answer is they just haven't returned yet -- Bondage Dave in particular seems to love sharing his opinions with the thousands of people who don't actually want to hear from him.

zee-ef-ex

Gabriela

Alex Powers: It's been so crazy around here with postings the past few days that your manip kind of got overlooked. I'm pretty sure that's Patricia Heaton from "Everybody Loves Raymond" (or as I like to call it, Everybody Loves Rape'n) with my former slave Aria's tits. What do I win?

----------------

John Galt: It's a good thing I had some free time on a Saturday afternoon, so I could kick back, relax and enjoy another one of your mammoth reviews. In spite of their extreme length, they are always well worth taking the time to read. I love how you humorously destroyed the pretentiousness of the filmmakers who think they're creating Great Art, when all we really want is to see a woman suffer. Like we've stated here before...you don't need fancy camera tricks if you've got the right casting. Just crank up the camera and let it record the action. These schmoes sound pretty clueless, and that's a damn shame since the women in the trailer on the site look awfully appealing.

Added to the Reviews section in my Homepage URL above.

----------------

Gabriela Atar: Speaking of appealing, I'm sorry to hear about your unfortunate situation with the guy in the ski mask. I'm afraid nobody here is going to help you, though. We might come by to watch, or maybe take advantage of you in your tied-up state, but don't expect to be untied unless we decide that you might look better in a different position instead. I think spreadeagled to your bed might be a better option. What do you think, guys?

----------------

ZFX': I made your story into a link rather than keeping the entire text on the forum. The link has some pictures and the format is also easier to read. If you've got something long to share in the future, that's usually the best way to go.

What you've related is an older story, but not all of our readers know about it so I'm glad you brought it back up here on this forum. I considered making it one of the Best and Worsts of the year in my year-end wrap-up, although not being from the UK, it doesn't have the same effect on me and most of the people who read this board. Nonetheless, it's censorship of the worst kind, and England is one of our friendly neighbors so it certainly doesn't show a good example when an entire country is overreacting to such a degree that they make free speech against the law, which essentially is the crux of what happened in this case.

The story of what happened to Jane Longhurst is a tragic one, but to blame the entire murder on porn and actually enact laws that make it a crime to view it is going back to the Dark Ages in their way of thinking. I don't know what percentage of British folk think this law is a good idea, but I know if this happened in the United States, a lot of people would be up in arms. Then again, this is also the same country that elected George W. Bush to a second term 4 years ago, so maybe they wouldn't be.

It's easier to go after the more extreme aspects of porn, the ones who produce material that go out of their way to be outlandish, which is why the Republican right-wingers in this country went after companies like Extreme Associates and Max Hardcore rather than your typical vanilla screw movies that John and Mary Beercan watch on a regular basis. And England probably figured they could get away with going after bondage, since a minority of people enjoy that sort of entertainment to begin with.

The thing is, any kind of restriction against consensual material is a step in the wrong direction. It could lead to passing laws that essentially make it a crime to view material in the safety of one's own home. And make no mistake, that's exactly what they've done here. It could be a punishable crime to say, visit our website here and download our daily picture. That's scary, and it's happening in present day, in these supposed enlightened times.

And it all goes back to the age-old way of thinking that exposure to violent materials causes violent behavior. All one has to do is look how the crime of rape has dropped considerably since the availability of porn on the Internet to disprove that theory. Porn is a good thing, and porn prevents rape. A guy is not going to run out and attack a woman because he saw a picture of a woman bound and gagged on the net. He's going to get off on the porn rather than create his own crime against an innocent woman. It's common sense. Porn creates an outlet. The absence of porn is what causes the problems. Oh well, they'll see. It's just really sad that so many others have to suffer the loss of their freedoms because of the close-mindedness of the people who enacted this law.

The writer describes the free-speech side as "riled" and a "motley crew," and that their arguments are "claims." The websites are "sickening" and "thankfully ... now defunct." Meanwhile, the mother of the dead woman is "quiet, dignified, courageous."

The writer also says: "In his warped mind, the hundreds of images he had seen on the web gave him permission to do it."

I cannot find anywhere in the story where the killer blames extreme porn for his actions. That was the prosecutors' argument, which, according to this Wikipedia entry, was pretty much dismissed by the court.

Now, my heart obviously goes out to the victim and the mother. But banning violent pornography will not resolve the problem that there are people in society who are irresponsible or totally fucked in the head.

The mother says, ''Sometimes you have to have a little restriction for the greater good..''

OK, so why stop at violent porn? I can guarantee that the percentage of people who drink irresponsibly do more direct damage to society than porn. Shall we ban alcohol for the greater good? A minority of teenagers hear Satan giving orders when they listen to heavy metal. Should we get rid of heavy metal? A minority of Muslims are terrorists. A minority of Christians blow up abortion clinics. Ban religion? All for the greater good, right?

This is just another example of politicians and the media trying to win over voters and sell newspapers by focusing on a sensationalistic aspect of a case. We've all seen this before.

But I've got a bad feeling nowadays. The complaints against porn will make it illegal in England to possess the loosely defined" ''extreme pornographic image.' And Australia plans to go ahead with that idiotic government filter for the Internet. I sure as hell hope this trend ends soon.

----------

On a lighter note:

zee-ef-ex: "Cargo 200" looks like it has potential. One important thing has been taken care of: The victim, Agniya Kuznetova, is certainly easy on the eyes.

----------

Gabriela Atar: I agree that the cage's holes were too wide in the cartoon. Besides, I'm not much into cages, as the bars tend to get in the way. BTW, it seems that you have successfully escaped your hogtie. Well done. I'm proud of you.

< mutters angrily to himself, puts on ski mask again, grabs gun and rope ... >

Those trailers have now been posted (with the exception of Attackers JBD-077, which already has a number of clips on YouTied). Here's the list:

• Attackers JBD-066

• Attackers JBD-067

• Attackers JBD-069

• Attackers JBD-071

• Attackers JBD-073

• Attackers JBD-074

• Attackers JBD-075 (This one was actually posted before the YouTied hiatus).

• Attackers JBD-076

• Attackers JBD-078

I owe the SubSpaceLand sound guy an apology. I re-watched Deeply Touched on my TV (instead of my workstation) and noticed, strangely, that the Smashing Pumpkins did not make an appearance. So, CSI-like, I investigated and discovered the two sound files were sitting on my desktop. Ah-hah. In Ubuntu Linux, you can hover your mouse pointer over a sound file and it will play as long as the mouse pointer is over it. So I am figuring that somehow my mouse pointer was wandering around behind the scenes, in the vicinity of those two files, and randomly activating them. I feel bad. Not as bad as Batman and Robin was, but bad nonetheless. I hate screwing up. Even though I do it far too frequently, I just can't get used to it. *sigh*

However, I will say that even on my TV, the scenes were still far too dark, the special effects were still just as annoying, Marcelino still looked pretentious and petulant and the New Age music was not as jarring as Smashing Pumpkins but still a needless artsy affectation. Aliz was still smokin' hot, though. And that pussy bulb device was still just as cool.

I e-mailed a corrected review to Ralphus, in which I excised my unwarranted criticism of the sound guy using random and nonsensical bits of the two Smashing Pumpkin songs, mentioning instead that the moody New Age music had me expecting an Enya song at any moment instead (which, in fact, most SSL features do). The moody music actually would have made the video even more pretentious, if its Pretentious Meter wasn't already pegged.

-----

Concerning the article ZFX'r posted, and the comments that followed, I will note that it is dangerous when a society passes laws that make commonplace behaviors illegal. If enough people find themselves breaking silly laws, they lose respect for the laws of society in general. In America, it is a lesson that we should have learned during Prohibition, but sadly we did not. As a result of Prohibition, the lives of regular citizens were needlessly and recklessly destroyed while organized crime blossomed by providing what Americans wanted. We have the same issues with the "War on Drugs" right now. If drugs were legalized and handled the same way as liquor and tobacco, it would remove one of the primary profit centers of modern organized crime. (There would still be criminal violations, just as with alcohol and tobacco.) Organized crime would have to shift to arms smuggling then, I guess. I'm not sure I mind a "War on Automatic Assault Weapons." But leave my porn alone. A "War on Hello Kitty Manacles and Vibrator Sets" is just too much.

ZFR'r: I've had several people (all from the UK) ask me to delete their YouTied accounts in recent months, and when I finally inquired to find out why they wanted them deleted, they cited this "law" as the reason.

Don't have the time nor space (nor is this even the proper forum, really) to get into a deep discussion on all my beliefs about "law", but at the end of the day, the only "law" there really is, is for you to exercise your Free Will in accordance w/ the better dictates of your conscience, and only to the extent that you inflict no damage upon other persons or their property.

Everyone has sexual desires.. even the most "venerated" of historical characters. If people want to see real kinkiness, check out what Benjamin Franklin et al were doing at the Hellfire Club in London back in the 1770s..

I don't approve of state laws that try to impress "morality" upon the people, firstly b/c (at least in America), the people are rulers over the government, and secondly b/c it never really works (vide drugs).. or at least, it never works if suppression of that kind of behavior is your desired effect. If you desire to drive the vice underground, and make a killing off the black market (again, vide drugs today), then these are absolutely wonderful laws.. but, w/ the commensurate cost to society.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k3Ls8mzcW4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI8maD5qTCA

Onto the ZFXr article. I have strong feelings about it. It makes me really angry when something like this happens in real life, just like Abu Ghraib and the current Israeli invasion make me angry. Basically people being mean to other people makes me angry, and people torturing and/or killing other people because they get off on it also makes me angry. There's no excuse for those people. But there is something drastically wrong with them that can usually be traced to childhood events and not BDSM erotica.

So of course, I don't think our precious BDSM pornography should be banned because it is NOT REAL. And it should be hard for minors to get to (which is my concern about Youtied, it is pretty accessible). All the BDSM I've ever seen, and all that I want to see, is consensual even if it is playacted not to be.

I reject the idea that BDSM/violent erotica makes people go out and abduct, murder, or torture people. I am living proof that it doesn't, as I hope are all of us on this board.

I've had several people (all from the UK) ask me to delete their YouTied accounts in recent months, and when I finally inquired to find out why they wanted them deleted, they cited this "law" as the reason.

That is truly scary. While obscenity laws are nothing new, the problem is rising to a whole new level when the lawmakers talk about prosecuting people who have pictures or images strictly for their own private use.

I decided to do a Google search on my own country's obscenity laws and came across this New York Times article from 1992. There's one aspect in this story that will likely disturb my American friends: the fact that the Catharine MacKinnon crowd supports this type of ruling. As some of us have said before, the threat to freedom doesn't come solely from the religious right.

Getting back to the UK situation, though, I do wonder how they plan to enforce the law. Then again, maybe I don't really want to know.

Yes I will agree that any war is abominable and makes me angry also.

Say no to any censorship.

The second DVD in Dan Hawke's Master Series, DHM-02: Training the Office Tramp, stars the delectable Madison Young, looking and acting her sluttiest as the titular Office Tramp. The DVD also features Payton, doing some of the actual tormenting, and of course Dan Hawke. The DVD features the full-length movie presentation and a 17-minute slide show of stills (or vidcaps) shown sequentially with kind of a funky music soundtrack. Many of the slide show pictures show Madison struggling or screaming in pain or frustration, which is kind of nice.

The video feature begins with Madison strutting into the workplace, walking, talking, and posing like a tease. She "accidentally" drops her purse and bends over slowly and provocatively to give the "boys" a show. She walks around the corner and gets knocked unconscious by Dan, who slings her over his shoulder and carries her off. This brief set-up scene is very grainy, by the way, and I am not sure whether it is done on purpose (a *shudder* special effect) or to compensate for low light. However, once Madison gets bonked, we are into nice, clear, well-lighted and unspecial-effects laden video. So no harm, no foul.

Madison comes to sitting against a post with a chain around her throat. She struggles and asks what is going on and Dan tells her that her coworkers have paid him to teach her a lesson. Lots of name-calling and insulting by Dan, and lots of over-the-top fearful emoting by Madison. Madison is dressed in a thin pink top and a pair of denim shorts that are really, really short. Black open-toed fuck-me heels. No underwear.

Dan handcuffs Madison's wrists behind her back around the wooden post, then gags her with a black ball gag. He ties a spreader bar between her ankles, but it is kind of a short wooden bar, so her legs aren't very spread. Hmphf. He removes the chain from around her neck, then ties a rope around her throat, passes it up through a pulley, and ties it off to the side. Dan takes out a knife and runs it over her chest, then slices into the neckline of her shirt. Stepping around behind her, he tears her shirt open, but doesn't get it completely torn, so he steps back around and cuts it down the front. Madison's right nipple is ring-pierced. The slut.

Dan also makes a point of demonstrating that Madison's short-shorts have only about a quarter-inch wide length of denim separating the legs, and when he pulls up on the shorts, the slender denim band sinks deeply between her pussy lips. He pulls up quite hard, and Madison cries out loudly in pain. Next, he ties a rope through the two front belt loops and passes the rope up through a pulley and pulls it taut, forcing the fabric between her pussy lips so that her smoothly-shaved pink mound balloons out on each side. Madison looks pretty hot with her sex in distress like that. She also makes appropriate noises around her ball gag. Madison does a great job of looking and acting like a damsel in distress. As a final touch, Dan fastens a clip onto her right nipple ring.

Dan leaves and we get several minutes of Madison struggling deliciously but ineffectually. Close-up of her pussy, with the denim pulled tightly through it. Various views as she struggles and makes noises and drools around the gag. I am not a big fan of watching a bound girl struggle, but I came to appreciate the bright red lipstick decorating Madison's full lips and her lovely smallish breasts and her incredibly sculpted full and infinitely suckable left nipple (the right one being pierced and all). The camera does a slow tour of her pale supple body and the drool collecting on her left breast and running down her flat belly is also a stimulating sight. Still, about halfway through I was ready for the next scene to begin. Like I said, I am not a fan of long lingering scenes of helpless babes struggling alone.

In the next scene, Madison is tied sitting on a chair, arms bound behind her back, with her right knee up and bent, and her right ankle tied high to the right leg of the chair. She is still wearing the tatters of her pink blouse, with her milky white tits exposed, and the short denim shorts, and the black heels. She is also wearing a red ball gag this time. Dan walks in and takes her left foot and ties a rope around it. He takes a moment to cut the strip of denim between her legs using a pair of scissors, which proves to be a difficult task but ultimately Dan triumphs. Madison seems extremely worried as he struggles with the scissors between her legs, in such close proximity to her pussy and the inside of her soft white thighs. It is kind of a hot scene.

Dan passes a rope around Madison's waist and up between her pussy lips, attaches it to the rope around her left ankle, and pulls it tight (through the pulley again), so that Madison is sitting with the rope pulled up tightly through her crotch and her left leg is pulled up into the air. When she pulls her leg down, it pulls up on her crotch rope, which is completely out of sight between her red swollen pussy lips. Dan leaves and once again we have several minutes of Madison struggling, groaning, moaning, gasping and whimpering. She is very expressive and I have to give her credit for carrying on so long. So very long. Once again, I am ready to move on long before the scene is done. However, I suspect that fans of gagged semi-naked babes struggling in helpless predicament bondage would appreciate this much more than I.

Next scene, Madison is bound against the post again. This time, her wrists are bound together above her head, pulled up but not too high so that her elbows are bent. Her knees are bent severely and her ankles are strapped to her thighs. She is straddling a wooden four-by-four fixed diagonally (so that one corner is pointed straight upward) and her denim shorts are pulled up around her waist, so that we can see her swollen pink pussy sitting on the corner of the four-by-four. The corners are rounded, but still that is probably uncomfortable. She is wearing a circle gag, so that her mouth is held open. Every so often during the following scene, Madison sticks her soft pink tongue out, which is nice.

Dan welcomes Payton into the scene. Payton is one of Madison's coworkers who paid him to kidnap and punish her, and she gets to help. Dan leaves and Payton takes over as Madison struggles on the wooden bar. Payton pinches Madison's nipples and pulls on her tits. She smacks her pussy. She runs her hand all over her body and slaps her belly. Then she leaves and once again we have several minutes of Madison struggling interminably. Don't get me wrong. She looks and acts and sounds like a helpless girl in pain and distress, but I am just a fan of more active torments. What I notice during this time is that Madison has a hood piercing, a navel piercing, a nipple piercing and a stud above her lip where old movies stars used to paint "beauty marks," and I am thinking that is a lot of hardware. I also notice the big blue star tattoo on the inside of her right wrist. I don't think that was Dan's intention for the lengthy struggling scene, though. Oh well.

The next scene has Madison standing, arms fastened apart over her head, still in the same clothes, but with a bar gag this time. If you are a fan of gags, this video should fulfill your needs. Payton enters the scene and pulls Madison's arms higher. And then, FINALLY, Payton cuts the clothes off of Madison, leaving her completely naked at last (except for her shoes). Well, you know, it is about damn time. I like my helpless babes naked. So I perk up immediately. Madison looks lovely, stark naked at last. She writhes and sways her hips in a most becoming manner. Payton spanks her a bit, and she cries out. Payton ties that spreader bar between her knees, which is a much better location, since it forces her legs farther apart.

Payton attaches a clothespin "zipper" to Madison, starting with the tender flesh inside her right arm, down to encircle her right breast, and down the right side of her belly to her crotch. Payton clips four clothespins to Madison's pussy lips (two on the left lip, two on the right), then a couple up the left side of her belly and ending with a clothespin on her left nipple. I counted about 26 clothespins in all, give or take. Then Payton announces that she's going to let Madison stand there all clothespinned up for a while and walks away, but catches her feet in the string and almost prematurely pulls off the clothespins, tugging suddenly on Madison's left nipple. Madison cries out, whether in warning or in anticipation of the pain, I'm not sure. It is kind of a funny almost-catastrophic mistake moment, though.

Another slow tour of Madison's clothespinned pale body, showing each clothespin and the tender flesh pinched between it. Also a lot of her moaning and groaning and drooling. I am ready for the zipper to be "unzipped" long before this scene ends. But finally Payton returns and teases Madison briefly, then rips off the clothespins. Madison's reaction is awesome. Payton, cruel bitch that she is, does it in three steps. The first jerk takes the clothespins off from left nipple down to her pussy. The scene rewinds and plays forward in slow motion as Madison arches and cries out. The second jerk pulls off three of the four pussy clothespins, and Madison's hips jerk forward as Payton pulls them off. Once again, rewind and slo-mo repeat action. Then Payton asks Madison if it hurts (Madison indicates in the affirmative), and tugs at the single clothespin still pinned to Madison's pussy lip. What a wicked bitch she is. Then she jerks the remaining clothespins off and we get another rewind and watch Madison writhe and arch as they come flying off. Afterwards, the red marks are visible everywhere the clothespins were attached. A very nice visual.

Payton spanks her and pulls on her tits. Then she pulls out a super-soaker and squirts water all over Madison's body. From Madison's reaction, it looks and sounds like the water is cold. Madison looks nice all wet and bound. Payton squirts her A LOT. Dan walks back in and announces that it is his turn again.

In the final scene, Madison is on her knees on a short wooden table. She is naked except for her shoes and she is gagged with a black ball gag. Ropes are passed around both legs from knee to ankle, fastening her lower legs to the wooden table. Her knees are apart. Her wrists are tied together, and pulled back between her legs, so that her head is forced down onto the table top. There is also a length of rope around her waist.

Dan enters the scene, ties her wrists tightly so that she is tied bent over with her ass in the air and her knees wide apart. Dan lines up the rope around her waist between her pussy lips and pulls it upward tightly, so that her ass is pulled up high. Madison looks so absolutely helpless, exposed and vulnerable in this scene that I wouldn't have minded a longer look. But oh well. I am not disappointed with the way things proceed. Dan whips her ass and threatens to whip her exposed pussy. Sadly, he does not, although he lightly swings up between her legs a few times. Next, he flogs her ass and her pussy and she cries out convincingly with each loud thwack. Extremely hot. He also flogs her back and legs, then returns to flog her pussy some more. Next, Dan employs the crop to smack her ass. He tightens the crotch rope, then crops her ass some more. And finally he whips out a switch (or cane) and uses it on her ass, leaving red streaks in its wake. This is more like it. Active whipping instead of passive struggling.

Dans exits the scene and we watch naked, vulnerable, red-marked Madison struggle for a minute before fade-out. There's a preview of DHM-03 and DMH-01 at the end.

SUMMARY: Okay, so we have Madison Young, a well-known and established bondage model, who I personally think is very hot. Slender body, milky white skin, breasts that are neither too large nor too small. Mmm. More piercings and tattoos than I prefer but in her case I am willing to overlook it. A basic storyline (kidnapping and punishment of the office tramp). Nice, real bondage, as well as a touch of predicament bondage which is always entertaining. A different gag for each scene, and she is tightly gagged. Dan Hawke does bondage for real, and I feel kind of sorry for the occasional models he gets who don't understand that, because he puts them through their paces in that respect. And finally, Madison is very good communicating (or performing) pain and suffering.

The only aspect of the DVD I did not particularly enjoy was the extremely lengthy parts where Madison struggled in bondage. She did a good enough job of emoting and looking helpless, but I am just not that big a fan of long bondage victim solo-suffering scenes. There was also no penetration or vaginal, oral, or anal stimulation. That is pretty standard for Dan Hawke's web site, Best Bound, though, so it was not a surprise.

All in all, a slick video production with nice lighting and sound. If you like a variety of gags, strict bondage torment, and lengthy views of a slender, sexy victim struggling helplessly, this is the DVD for you. I feel very comfortable giving this a solid B.

I'm one of the 35000, many answers to many subjects of THIS forum are given in the documentary.

With an enforced absence at an end, it is so good to be back with this band of sick twisted perverts.

Finally got to open my VM shipments and will post a review on "Breaking Her Will" tomorrow.

Looking forward to a new year with alot of catch up to do.

Stay Well All

a (perhaps) new movie for the rape-database.

titel: Dungeon Girl (2008)

this movie is in germany to rent since round 4 weeks.

a man hold a young blond girl trapped in his house in a wood/desert out of civilization over a lot of years. the girl is first in a room with steeldoor, later in a dark hole under a staircase. the girl must shower under the eyes of the old man, he touch the girl and so one. the girl will that not, the man is furious and dreamed that the girl is in the medieval age a witch and burn at a stake. later the girl can escape and the man killed himself.

i mean a bad movie, but ok for hardcore-collectors :o)

from the burning at the stake-scene i have make some caps.

i hope you understand my bad english - best regards TARL

Like you (and most GIMPers, if past polls are any indication), I'm no fan of piercings and tattoos. Even if the woman is supposed to look slutty -- and it's clear that was the case here -- the tats and jewelry put me off.

Without having seen it, my guess is I would enjoy the super soaker scene the most. On the other hand, I'm not such a big fan of clothespin scenes or lingering shots of a woman struggling. Thus, I'm feeling lukewarm about this movie. But I say that knowing Dan's movies are aimed at people whose interests are slightly different than mine.

-----

Alex Powers: I have seen the question asked several times but have never seen an answer. So far, I don't believe anyone has determined where the Rape Night clip comes from. If anyone would know, it might be Jefferson.

-----

Sloth: I'm looking forward to your review of Breaking Her Will. Jackie Stevens, the star of the movie, looks pretty hot and I still think this film has potential. I'm keeping my fingers crossed....

I'm a big fan of your films, and I love your approach, (a) that the model is struggling and not just tied (often I watch in wonder at the strength of these girls tolerating what you put them through for so long) and (b) that you linger on them.

The only things I don't like are your sometimes excessive use of close-ups and weird Batman camera angles.

I am a fan in porn of using the full model view as much as possible. A focus on a face is nice, and an occasional body pan is nice, but mostly I want to see the whole package.

How do others feel about that?

zee-ef-ex

There's a New Slave Island Biography movie coming out on the 7th this month.

There's a New Slave Island Biography movie coming out on the 7th this month.

I assume that is this movie. I wonder how this will be different than a typical Slave Island movie?

In Dan's productions, there is never any doubt who the star is. The model is always posed and framed to make her the center of attention.

I really like the fact that Dan usually poses models in a standing position. Although he is master of other positions, he frequently uses an upright position to fully displays the models' naked charms. Such a position also leaves models completely exposed for torments, such as crotch ropes, flogging, and clamps.

They've got it backwards.....the UK's got it backwards.....the Muslim states that ban porn have it backwards....

Porn prevents crime! Look at the fucking data for crying out loud and stop letting the few that maintain a bully pulpit promulgate their holier than thou bullshit on the people!

Porn encourages horny men to whack off....therefore they don't have the energy to go out and rape. You do that with hundreds of millions of men over the globe and you get a reduction in rape. It's a simple energetic process that any physicist could figure out. Those in power use porn as a weapon to fool the extremely religious elements of their society into believing that porn is a threat. Then they crack down on porn and come out the hero....justifying their position of dom to a nation of slaves.

I know when I've made my own highlights vids of Dan's work, I've intentionally shortened a lot of his multi-angle leering after the scene is over, even though most of it is really good footage, and often the best part of the scene. After a while, though, you have to decide as the director when enough is enough.

I think the tendency is to use all the footage you've shot, and Dan is certainly not the only director who could be accused of padding his films. If I'm watching a scene I've edited and notice myself getting antsy, then it's time to cut it short. You're not losing anything, you're preserving the quality of your movie. Sometimes less really can mean more. If someone is hitting the fast-forward button on my film, it means I went on too long.

Like Canadian, it's the tattoos and piercings that turn me off on a model, and as much as I think Madison Young could be attractive, I also can't get past all the "embellishments" she's had done to her body. I have very few stills of her on my hard drive for that reason, even though she's cute. I doubt I would have given this one as high a grade as you, simply because of the model. Casting is so, so important. In the Hawke films I've rated the highest, it's because the model was someone who rang my bell in the first place, and coupled with the Dan's expert treatment, that just makes the combination hard to beat.

Your review was added to the Reviews section in my Homepage URL above.

--------------

TARL: I really dig your Yahoo group. You make some excellent vidcaps, and even though I failed to mention it on the group itself, thanks very much for the Girl Next Door caps. I got kind of excited when you mentioned a new burning at the stake scene in Dungeon Girl, but I recognized the stills right away as coming from the 1983 film The Devonsville Terror. Whoever it was that made the new film obviously ripped off the footage and then called it something different, but that wouldn't be the first time it's happened on video.

-----

Steve Power: You're preaching to the choir, man. But amen to your words!

-----

zee-ef-ex: I processed your description of don't likes through my viewing of DHM-02. Dan employed close-ups but not excessively, to my way of thinking. I liked the ratio of close-ups to full-body views in this production. (It was mostly full body.) If he used weird Batman camera angles they did not detract from my viewing experience. He did employ several angles during the struggling scenes, but honestly nothing I would characterize as overly bizarre.

I am generally in agreement with your likes and dislikes, although I like more than the occasional close-up. I love expressive models and I enjoy seeing facial expressions of surprise, pain or humiliation when it is justified. Both the action and the reaction are key elements for my viewing pleasure. I liked Dan's mix in this specific DVD.

-----

weewilly: Madison was indeed mostly upright in this DVD. Although I do think the sequence when she was on her knees was extremely hot. You are right, though, that she was first, last and always the center of attention.

-----

A Canadian: Thanks for the kind words, as always. I try hard to be thorough with my reviews and descriptions. Probably too thorough. But I am well aware that people have different tastes and I hope even when I am describing something I don't like (or don't particularly care about) that I do it well enough that someone reading it might think hey, that sounds pretty cool to me, even if the reviewer doesn't like it....

I think Ralphus will be featuring stills from DHM-02 all week, so you may get to see a nice shot of the super soaker scene. Madison sure does look nice wet.

-----

Dan Hawke: You're welcome. I'm glad you liked the review.

Canadian -- Thanks for the Attackers trailers. #66 is pretty damn hot, innit!

re remote vibes: I once bought a remote vibe for my girlfriend then took her out to dinner with friends. It was fun watching her try to form coherent sentences while squirming and moaning!

tztztz... ripped in an old movie... *smile

my next tip for the database:

"The Pet" from 2006

it is a normaly mainstreammovie.

a young girl was dressed to a dog. all what you want you can find in the movie. trainigscenes, cages, iron collars with electroshocks, play in snow, a harmless rape from a asian girl, branding, hanging, bondage and and and. a very nice movie i mean and a absolut "must have" for all friends.

tommorow you can see screens from the movie. i have make over 120 vids, but it´s a hard work to formated all - and i hope i have today enought time for this.

best regards TARL

p.s. i hope that i have make the html correct - i´m a pc-dummie.

Without further ado, let's get started. Today we will review the Bill Zebub production "Breaking Her Will". The flick runs 1 hour 36 minutes. Stars the lovely and gracious Jackie Stevens, the vastly underrated Brian Glietz, Carl "Chaos" Williamson, the incomparable Bill Zebub and everyone's favorite screen corpse Kathy Rice. Included is a trailer for "Jesus Christ Serial Rapist". I obtained my copy from Video Mayhem at the above link.

A brunette hitchhiker gets picked up by our villain. He drives to a secluded nature trail parking lot, fetches a knife and cuffs from the trunk and forces her to cuff herself. It would seem he locks her in the trunk and transports her to his romantic hide-a-way. She is handcuffed in front, blindfolded and ball gagged. To get her attention and keep her focused he smacks a hammer on the concrete. He lays next to her on the floor and verbally taunts her. Producing a 2x4 with a small crossbeam he nails the handcuffs to the upright and ties her ankles to the crossbeam. She remains face up on the floor thus attached.

Going to work with the knife, he shreds her tank top. He straddles her and orders her to try and escape while fondling her boobs. He peels off her undies and diddles her pussy. She realizes she better cooperate or else which enrages him since he wants rape and not consent. He departs to watch some tele while she squirms. Then off to the computer where he pulls up images of crucified girls and whacks off before retiring for the night.

Rising in the morning, he wakes his captive and releases her from the frame. A bowl is shoved under her ass and she is ordered to urinate. She kneels and is recuffed to the frame for feeding. She is given some water and forced to eat bread off a plate on the floor. The villain goes off to prepare BBQ as she attempts to work that nail loose. In flashback we learn a spat with her boyfriend caused her to walk out and get picked up by this cad. When he returns he crushes two of her fingers with a channel lock.

Forcing her to kneel he applies the lock to her nipple. In a game called "guess what this is" he takes a needle and jabs it into the sole of each foot, then into her ass. He lights up a smoke, heats it up and burns the sole of her foot. Not wanting to waste Vaseline on her burn he lubes up a beer bottle and inserts it up her pussy. She is ordered to clamp down on it and not let go. He uses manual strangulation to throttle her into unconciousness.

Next morning her brings her some chow and feeds her some gruel. The oatmeal hardens so he thins it by hocking a lugie in it. After the feeding she gives him a blow job. He stands her on a plastic container, handcuffed AOH to ceiling. He leaves and again whacks off to crucified girl images. When he returns she has pooped without permission so he mops her off, then carts her off to a proper bath. Gag and blindfold are removed and she gets a scrub down. He sits her on the thunder bucket and cuts off her hair. The rest of the flick he alternates her between blonde and brunette wigs. She is transported unbound to the bed where he taps her.

For a time she serves as his foot stool as he watches tele, then it's off to the playroom where she's blindfolded and ballgagged, attached AOH to ceiling standing on her toes while he takes some photos. Then unbound she stands in the woods where he uses a pistol to shoot an apple off her head. Back home he continues to document her progress in his journal. During a chat in the kitchen he tells her he works for an international slave trade network and she is to be sold. A lengthy talk follows as to the gruesome death she can expect if she does not obey and how the network is everywhere and will find her if she attempts to escape. She is placed back in the playroom AOH sans blindfold and gag.

He plans to use her to lure other girls for abduction so he allows her an unfettered walk in the woods where she encounters a neighbor she thinks is a member of the network. The abduction that ensues is not shown but the victim is shown belly up on a table, wrists and ankles tied to table legs, blindfolded and ballgagged. Our bait stands in slinky lingerie observing as the villain gives the new miss a fondling and chokes her unconscious. He leaves, she regains her senses and bait removes her gag. We learn the new lass had a bondage and sadistic relationship with an older guy when she was very young. She begs to be released. Upon his return he taps the newbie as bait issues orders as to how she should respond to this particular fucking. Instead of obeying, she taunts him about what a lousy lay he is. She then recognizes his voice as that of the older guy in her relationship. In a rage he manually chokes her to death.

The villain bunks out and our first victim comes in with another slinky lingerie outfit. He handcuffs her, throws her on the bed and taps her doggie style. Laying next to her, he puts her in a WWF choke hold and kills her. He goes out to the woods and hangs himself. The End

Movie Pluses - liked the concept and much of the execution - both models very nice and natural and carried out their roles pretty well I thought - the villain was good going from savage sadistic beast to playful man-child in an instant - this even has a musical soundtrack that went fairly well with the film, a "Love Theme from Breaking Her Will".

Movie Minuses - the deaths and strangulations are not terribly well staged and there was a pacing problem - started strong and intense, waned in the middle, then picked up a bit at the end - and what an awful ending - no self respecting Gimper would do that, he'd just go get another chick.

The Verdict - well, this is the best Bill Zebub effort I've viewed to date - a number of Gimp-worthy moments but lacking a bit on physical torment, think Powershotz type with more dialogue and less stringent bondage - still, I found it a pretty nice view.

My Grade B-

Stay Well All

Hey all,

Just thought I'd post one more update concerning YouTied, so that people aren't taken by surprise again, but like I said earlier.. going forward we're going to (temporarily) take YouTied offline to make some fundamental changes to the business model, so that the site actually MAKES money, (or at least breaks even), instead of constantly hemorraging enormous amounts of bandwidth..

This will only be temporary (for about a month or so), while we re-program the site to add new features, and add revenue models to support the site/bandwidth, etc..

However, I'm writing this to let you know that we're probably going to be taking the site offline in the next couple days ... just letting you know so you're not taken offguard (again).

-----

MasterDetective: Thanks for the YouTied update. I would hope YouTied sticks around until at least the weekend, as I have a number of clips I would like to upload. But I can understand you are eager to get on with the improvements so it won't surprise me if YouTied goes dark again before then.

A few random thoughts about your synopsis...the whacking off to crucified women appears to be a Zebub trademark. I know he definitely has some sort of crucifixion fetish, so naturally he had the villain do the same thing. Makes you wonder why he didn't just tie her to a cross himself. And I guess his idea of going "over the top" is to have the bad guy spit in her oatmeal...gee, that's really harsh. He should have made her drink her own pee, that would have been meaner. I'm also curious about the haircutting scene...how did Zebub pull that off?

Anyway, since you and I usually agree on movies, I'm even more curious to check this one out myself. What's ironic is that Larry at Video Mayhem is actually thinking of pulling the film off his site because a month has gone by and Zebub still hasn't gotten him any DVDs to sell yet, despite repeated e-mails that have gone unanswered. Seems a little odd to diss one of the only two retailers that are planning to carry the film online so far.

The link for your official review is in my Homepage URL above.

I love real life stories and want to know more. Were the friends you and your G/F went out with in on the joke? Did they notice her reactions? What did they say? How did the two of you handle your friend's questions?

zee-ef-ex

I do not have a crucifixion fetish, or any fetish. A fetish is an object that is required in order for someone to achieve orgasm. It isn't just another word for "kinky."

I partner with the guy who runs crucified-women.com quite often, in case you are confused about the crucifixion content in my movies.

My apologies to those who are waiting for the Breaking Her Will. I have been assured that the DVD's will be ready for pick-up tomorrow. I am a bit bewildered by your notion of what a "review" is. Giving a play-by-play is usually called a "spoiler." But then, it doesn't seem that you lot watch movies the usual way.

Anyway, next project is Ravage the Scream Queen.

One friend was the very sexy Miss Simone, a porn star (no bondage, alas!) and a beautiful soul, and a fellow who might have been a promoter (he dissed my sweetie after a blow-up with me, so we dropped him). They weren't in on at first, but after a few reactions, we let them know what was up (or on, as the case may be -- this time it was on her clit).

They thought it was fun (I have the feeling Miss Simone might have tried the remote vibe herself a time or two. I don't recall what questions they asked, but I do recall my gf squirming ever-so-cutely as she tried to answer.

I have a **pinch** of sadist in me, she has a **pinch** of masochist in her, so it works out well.

-----

Personally, I AM looking for a play-by-play (or more accurately, a blow-by-blow) when it comes to GIMP movies. I am not looking for sophisticated psychological or literary meanings. I am not necessarily interested in clever plot twists. Sloth's review is pretty much what I expect from GIMP reviews, as it tells me in no uncertain terms what to expect in the way of GIMP-ness.

You joked that you don't "check this site," but I thought maybe you did read it, since you post here occasionally. Even a cursory glance through the Reviews section would have clued you in to the kinds of reviews "we lot" read and write. You might have avoided the disappointment. But look on the bright side: If I had reviewed it, I would have spoiled it two or three times longer.

It does sound like a pretty good GIMP flick, though. Thanks for the review, Sloth. Once the "hysteria" dies down and the movie is actually being distributed, I might just check it out. We all might appreciate a heads-up here on the forum when you get them in stock, VM.

Bill Zebub - you're probably quite right about this lot watching movies in a different way - what would one expect from this bunch :-) - your other question as to what we think a movie review is - well, perhaps a blow by blow description as to the on screen action in any movie should be called a movie synopsis rather than review so your point is well taken - so it may be correct to rename it the "Movie Synopsis Section".

I am curious as to whether you read my "synopsis" on "Breaking Her Will" and whether or not you find it accurate and fair considering the restraints of an entirely text medium - and I do not refer to my opinions or the grade I gave it, only to the accuracy of the rundown - take a moment and let me know.

Stay Well All

As far as the "hysteria", I would think there would have to be something important on the board worth getting hysterical about. It doesn't sound to me that your movie qualifies, sorry to disappoint you.

The best reviews that usually get posted here are generally a combination of synopsis and opinion. Seeing how we mainly cover bondage videos, we are more concerned with details of the bondage, rape or torture aspects of a production, rather than "important" issues such as the filmmaker's vision and the intrinsic meanings of the story he's attempting to tell. Call it a spoiler if you wish if you feel we're breaking the Cardinal sin of most generic movie reviews if they reveal actual plot developments or (shudder) the ending. Admit it or not, but your film was made for "our lot" so that's the way it's going to be covered on the forum. I have a lot more trust in what a veteran reviewer like Sloth has to say rather than the gushing review you posted here a while back from the other site.

Casanova. 1976 - Federico Fellini - There is only a crap near whipping scene in this movie. A good looking woman asks Donald Sutherland to whip her ass with a small red whip. She lifts up her dress exposing her ass and gets very excited about it but he stops at the last minute. The scene is comedic and in a foreign language with subtitles.

Does anybody know the directors of any of these movies listed? I am trying to track down the DVDs but they are impossible to find. Probably because the titles are wrong or translations. Blind Cat - Harem Slave - Ines the Novice - The Last Sundown - The Lycantropus & The Vampire - Revenge for a Sister - Summer Heat - Up From Slavery - Vendetta Cieca.

----------

Bill Zebub: Ditto what others here have said about what reviews should be like on this forum. Sure, there have been some jabs about the length of the reviews, but more often than not, the complaints are about a lack of description of the scenes. That's why the reviews here may sound like "spoilers," as you put it.

It seems you are too busy denying you have a crucifixion fetish to reply to Sloth's query on whether his review was fair. Or maybe you are not sure what to say. Do yourself a favor. Scroll down to January 5 on this page and check out Dan Hawke's response to John Galt's review of "DHM-02: Training the Office Tramp." Dan's description of the production process and what he was striving for is the kind of feedback that is greatly appreciated by "us lot."

----------

TARL: "Dungeon Girl" was a huge letdown for me, except for the (repeated) burning at the stake scene. I was expecting so much more. That was one very strange movie.

----------

Nicho: "Summer Heat," the 1979 roughie starring Jamie Gillis and Desiree Cousteau, was produced by Christy and Jerry McCabe and directed by Christy McCabe. Sorry, I'm not sure I can help with any of the other titles you've listed.

I added your description of Casanova to the database tonight. And we can always use more movie descriptions, caps or video clips. Send any pictures to me via e-mail and I can add them to the databases. And you can post any descriptions right here like you did today. Contributions are welcomed and encouraged.

--------------

Wow, in the nearly 10 years of this site, we've had posts from Santa Claus, Lisa Kinkaid and now God Himself has finally made an appearance. I always suspected it but now we all have proof...God is a GIMPer.

The thing is, He is a well-known Lurker, having pretty much kept a low profile since He accidentally knocked up a Jewish girl a couple thousand years ago. I've always been pretty sure He was lurking on the forum, but I am surprised He broke His silence. I guess crucifixion must have a special meaning for Him.

Like I said a few times, I put my neck on the chopping block, and if you chop it off then justice was served.

Let me just clarify something, so you don't take any of what I write as an insult - just because I don't reply to a review doesn't mean that I blow it off. I just don't feel that it is a director's place to reply, especially in a forum. That's a job for other people in the forum who have also seen the movie.

During YouTied's brief return run, I did notice a number of YouTied regulars were missing, such as anti-GIMPers Bondage Dave and Hobra. I'm guessing they may have been among those scared off by the new anti-porn legislation in the U.K.

I always knew that God was a lurker here. I find it interesting that it took Bill Zebub to draw him out.

A Canadian: I want to thank you for the You-Tied contributions. I'm always shopping for Japanese titles that fit my taste. The clips are the best way for me to get a feel for what's out there. I am particularly fascinated by "Godess of Hell" and JBD-066. Like Rqalphus, I fall more on the torture side than rape or forced orgasm.

What is the real problem with YouTied? It's up and down more then a yo-yo. Is it ever coming back?

In any event I am pro this site and its content.

Stay well all.

I'll let Ralphus speak to the merits of JBD-066, as I have only seen the trailer. But when it comes to Goddess of Hell, I do think GIMPers should check it out. I don't think it would be off base to say that people who like ZFX will probably like Goddess of Hell. It has great whipping scenes and other torture scenes that are very effective.

As for the Japanese titles, I've never know anything which features "Mr. Cool Shades" to be disappointing.

I have really let a lot of things slide over the past few months and it's time to get off my ass and order some new vids.

I will have some more time in about two weeks to get some reviews up. I would love to see a review on the Esmoraldo Zen flick that was posted on You-tied. It appeared to have potential. Can anyone recommend a good file converting program, I need to be able to convert WMV's or Q-time files into DVD format. I hate watching porn on a 13" screen. This is one of the reasons I avoid downloads.

I was referring to Ralphus's demonic counterpart who resides in the nether regions.

What, you're saying I'm not demonic on my own? After years of torturing innocent women, I think I've earned that title, thank you very much. I have a reputation to uphold.

If you're looking for an excellent Japanese torture flick, you should love Attackers JBD-066. Check out my review in my Homepage URL for more details. And in case you missed it, Canadian reviewed "Goddess of Hell" recently (in the Reviews section under Attackers JB-103). You'll find some great titles there, and each review has a link at the bottom of the page where you can easily order them online.

I stopped by the Gimp website twice today. During my first visit two stills were posted from DHM02: Training the Office Tramp. The camera angles were straight ahead shots and I found myself thinking, wow, Madison looks hot, and I grabbed copies of the photos.

The second time I stopped by you had changed the pictures. On the new screenshots, the angle is shooting from somewhere near the floor up at Madison. I found myself thinking, Madison looks so ugly. I feel like an ant looking up at a skyscraper.

Dan, this is what I mean by "Batman" camera angles, not just tilted floors but these elongated views that distort the appearance of the model. Your films are great in so many ways, but these angles are a minor annoyance.

Maybe others want to chime in on the respective angles and which style they prefer to see, if Ralphus could kindly post them side-by-side?

zee-ef-ex

Madison straight on

Followed by one of tonight's daily pics:

Madison from a lower angle

Frankly, I like both shots. I'm pretty sure the above pic is the master shot Dan used when filming the action and the lower angle is from after he's left the scene and he's letting the camera explore her bound body from all angles. I mentioned before that sometimes that's the best part of a particular scene, because I like to ogle her as she lingers in an uncomfortable position and I think Dan does a great job of letting us see every inch of her. The main complaint about that aspect of the way Dan directs is that he goes a bit overboard and lets the scene run a bit too long, but I definitely like it when we get to see different shots of his models.

These kind of camera angles during the action tend to put me off. For a slow and loving tour of the helpless bound babe's distressed body, though, I don't mind them if they are used in moderation, which I judge they were in this video. Opinions may vary. In fact, I believe such views may be fairly common because they did not really jump out at me as being overly unique or unusual, so subconsciously I must have been accepting them as standard stuff, if you know what I mean. Or maybe I just watch too much Batman-inspired porn.

Brutus - you are correct that Bill Zebub abandoned the art and croissant style on "Breaking" and played it pretty straight-up and that is always good news - I was interested when Tarl put up the info on "Dungeon Girl" and wanted to take a look until I saw it was an Ulli Lommel movie - ever since he split from his funding source, Suzanna Love, his stuff has been pure crap - what a shame - so I assume the burnings in it were his clips from "Devonsville"

A Canadian - thanks for those Youtied clips before it went down - very nice.

God - this may not be the proper venue and I know how busy you are but maybe in your spare time you could deliver Aria back into the clutches of Ralphus - he's been a bit grouchy lately - and I promise I'll go back to church after this 35 year hiatus.

Stay Well All

Anyway, I saw someone mention the "uncut" version of Rest Stop and thought I'd chime in, as I saw it not too long ago.

Honestly, I wasn't impressed. There are some interesting gimp scenes, but when the torturing the women, the scene gets cut. There is significant time spent on Jessie's boyfriend, chained and tortured on the table, as well as the blond girl's boyfriend.

There are some "quick flash" shots of Jessie also chained and tortured, but I mean... its quick.

This could have been good, if the directer had just lingered on the women a little longer. The blond girl ends up tied up in a black tank top and shorts in a garage, and is tortured, but the shot lingers on her face as he drills her leg, and then cuts... the actual torture is not shown.

There is no nudity... even a bloodied Jessie's ghost, who shows up in the middle of the film is not really shown as she somehow gets a guy to screw her in her bloody state (WYF?). I don't care how much of a crush I had on a chick, if she showed up, after missing for a year, bloodied and cut up... I'd take her to the hospital... not screw her in the middle of the forest. Which is what this guy does.

The overall story sucks as well, so its not worth watching for the story either. If you do rent this stinker, keep your finger on the FF button.

Yes, many of the Japanese titles in the reviews section have captured my interest. I will be placing an order for sure. I still want a copy of "CUT" as well. I have a good feeling about that one.

As for the angles, I sorta like the variety of shots. Particularly during the idle moments when we just watch the vic struggle. However, I hate tilt and inverted shots. I can't tolerate anything that makes me tilt my head.

----------

Dan's angles: I'm also in the camp that is not bothered too much by different camera angles as long as the scene doesn't go on too long. But, yes, I prefer a movie where most of the camera work is straight on, especially for close-ups on the victim's gagged face.

----------

Rest Stop 2: I'm in-between regarding the ratings of elkcreek and Sardu. The scene was quite brutal and the victim was hot. However, she should have been naked with the gag left on. My main problem with "Rest Stop 2" is a complaint I often make about horror films these days. Most of the really "good" and lengthy torture sequences involve guys.

----------

A Canadian wrote: I did notice a number of YouTied regulars were missing, such as anti-GIMPers Bondage Dave and Hobra. I'm guessing they may have been among those scared off by the new anti-porn legislation in the U.K.

I don't think Hobra's British, as English isn't his first language. But I did notice a hint of British slang from BondageDave. My guess is they never knew YouTied was back. Hopefully when they try to log in while MasterDetective is making the changes, they'll assume the site's gone for good and remove it from their bookmarks.

----------

Bill Zebub wrote: I never reply to reviews, that is, unless there is a personal attack. Sometimes I quote reviews, but that's about it, lol.

Fair enough. Still, I enjoy reading what producers say about praise or criticism of their products. I guess if I end up reviewing "Ravage the Scream Queen," I'll have to launch a personal attack against you to get some feedback :-)

Anyone here ever had a membership to Inshadow.com? How are they?

However, in this case I wanted to make a quick contribution. In the new movie "The Unborn" there is a gimp-worthy scene. Star Odette Yustman is strapped to a gurney as they try to exorcise the dybbuk and a gag is strapped into her mouth. It's a medical looking device, but I swear it has overtones to those gags so popular in Japanese films where you can force a woman to give you oral sex because her mouth is stuck in the open position.

Again, sorry to bother anyone. I just wanted to give the gang a quick heads up.

The movie opened with Riria Himesaki -- reprising her role from New Slave Island 2 -- giving head in a 1 min cameo while two guys (the masterminds of Slave Island) watched the action and taunted Riria. Then the story of New Slave Island Chapter 3 began.

A doctor and nurse rushed a fast dying woman (Yuuho Kitada) to the operating theater. They seemed to know this woman personally. Yuuho was found on the south coast of the island, unconscious and dying. What happened to her all this while? Then the flashback started.

Yuuho was previously a nurse at this hospital. She has a happy life - a fiance doctor from the opening scene. The nurse from the opening nurse was her good friend. Everything was so sweet and perfect. Then one day, she was kidnapped at the hospital and bought to the slave island.

That's basically the whole story, don't expect anything complicated.

The actions started from 10 min onward. The next one hour, we see Yuuho Kitada being raped, forced BJ, dildo sucking, and a few slaps all pretty standard stuffs. At around 70 mins, we have our second slave, Reira Minatsuki, the younger sister of Yuuho's fiance. It turned out that a junior doctor (the handsome guy), the junior of the doctor fiance and also a close friend of them were responsible for the two women's abductions. The hunk revealed his identify as the mastermind to the despaired gals.

The standard rape scenes continued with Yuuho and Reira taking turns. While Yuuho was enduring the rape and abuse in Slave Island, the doctor fiance has gotten over the sudden disappearance of Yuuho. He took a liking to the nurse friend. The doctor and nurse fell in love, got married and had a child. I guess at least 2 years have passed. So now the doctor have forgotten about Yuuho while she was still held captive in Slave Island.

The last hour of the movie has Yuuho appearing in the hospital. We're back where the story started. I have no idea how she ended up there (movie never say). Yuuho was now mute and her legs crippled but her hell wasn't over yet. The slavers have found her. Right after she woke up, she was forced to give a BJ to the slaver. The doctor hunk has no intentions of letting her go. He threatened her with the lives of Reira, her ex finance and nurse friend. Yuuho had to obey his orders and not tell anyone what happened to her.

The last 20 minutes has Riria Himesaki returning again in a 2nd cameo (2 minutes this time) from Yuuho flashback in the hospital. Some hot body rubbing, kisses, tits fucking then the last scene has them licking each other clits furiously until exhaustion. I liked Riria Himesaki and would love to see more of her. I hope that her scenes in the series next movie will be longer.

The movie closed with the nurse friend crying in front of Yuuho's bed. She doesn't understand what has happened to Yuuho. It ended with the bad hunk and accomplice paying Yuuho another visit at the hospital. Nothing has changed for sad Yuuho. She was still a prisoner, only now - the place has changed from Slave Island to the hospital. END.

Conclusion. What I liked about slave island series are the little stuff (the bondage (too mild IMO), the gags (too little), the dog collars, whips, leashes, some slapping, enema flush, dog bowls, humiliation, degradation) For the endless rape or BJ stuff, I would have got that in other Attackers movie. I was looking for something different or more of what I liked) but I didn't see that in this movie. Yuuho Kitada and Reira Minatsuki aren't too attractive to me either and that's another minus.

This movie is little disappointing overall. There are no memorable scenes from this 3Hrs long movie. It lacked the intensity of better stories like Slave Island 11 and 12. But New Slave Island 3 is better than the very poor Slave Island 2, 4, 10. It's certainly worth watching if you like this series.

Lastly, why did the producers remove gags of any kind in New Slave Island Chapter 2 and now 3? Judging by the cover, I don't see any in New Slave Island Biography movie too. The gagged scenes are already very few in Slave Island movies, now they remove it all together.

Rating - 3 out of 5 stars.

I just watched New Slave Island 3 last night and I am mostly in agreement with your assessment, although unlike you I thought the film's stars were attractive, particularly Reira Minatsuki.

I definitely agree with you the movie lacked edge. It also lacked originality. I don't think I saw one scene in New Slave Island 3 that hasn't been done before and done better in other movies. For example, in Slave Island 11, I loved the scene where Luna Akatsuki was bound to a gym mat and gang raped. But that was in late 2007. That type of scene has been repeated too often since then and has never been as good. The producers need to come up with some new ways of torturing and humiliating the women. And if the series is going to continue, then it must bring back the scenes of degradation, such as the dog bowls.

I am fine with lack of originality. Porn is repetitive. Looking back, my problem with this movie are the actresses. I don't find them attractive (like in Slave Island 2, 4, 10) and of course, the gals make or break an adult movie more than anything else.

I watched Slave Island 9 again and again because of the gorgeous Aya Koizumi though that movie wasn't that great.

I hope that Attackers will bring back the more popular actresses to headline this series like Maria Ozawa or the newly recruited Asami Ogawa.

Can you add my review to the gimp movie review? You can edit if desired.

Lastly, I noticed that Video Mayhem sell dvds by shipping. I would like to buy some movies by pay and download. Do you know of any other sites where I can get New Slave Island 2 movie? Thanks.

EXACTLY, my problem with it. Nudity, or no... if they had just done to the gals, what happened to the guys in this movie... it would have been an instant GIMP classic.

DHT Wrote: "God bless youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-_936SWPdQ"

Wow... very artsy and well done. Of course I'd really like to see "what happens next" but the directing style was really something else.

First of all, I am a very devoted follower of these databases and I can't tell you how much I appreciate them being restored and updated.

Anyone else encountering problems accessing the vidcaps linked with the torture rack/whipping scenes/electro torture databases? Most seem to be corrupted files.

Thanks!

I posted a message asking if anyone has experianced any problems recieving orders from Video Mayhem recently a short while ago. I just dropped by to see if there are any helpful comments posted and I find that my message is no longer there. I know that it was posted successfully, I looked at it just before logging off.

It looks like the message was removed. Is there some rule on this board against asking about Video Mayhem orders? If not, then where is my original message?

Thanks Ralphus, VM. I just got VM's E-mail a few minutes ago. I originally didn't want to bring the problem up on this board. However, I was getting desperate for options. I had already sent two seperate E-mails asking about my order with no reply to either.

Once, again, thanks you two.

Rest Stop: Don't Look Back: The plot sounds intriguing. Elkcreek seemed to love it, Sardu thinks it's disappointing and Brutus is in between. Nice that we're getting a variety of opinions. I'll check it out. It doesn't cost anything extra to put it in my Netflix queue. I'm just not going to set my expectations real high.

Does it piss off anybody else that guys seem to be getting the bulk of the torture in horror films? Maybe the filmmakers think that's what we want. Who knows, maybe they're right. How else can you explain the success of the first Hostel (which was a sausagefest) and the comparatively meager showing of Hostel: Part 2, in which 3 lovely ladies met up with bondage and torture? Maybe the filmmakers are too easy on women because they're women and they think showing them suffering or raped (or hell, even naked) would make people too uncomfortable. Maybe it's just this politically correct era that is holding them back. For whatever reason, it sucks. Bring back 1970s sensibility, dammit!

---------------

Mirage: Thanks very much for your review of the latest New Slave Island. That's a series I've never really had much interest in, but I know it definitely has its audience, especially around these parts. To me, just rape after rape gets boring after a while. I know what you said about porn being repetitive; I tend to gravitate toward unusual things I've never seen before. I know there's only so many ways that one can show intercourse scenes, but as the Attackers series has proven, there's a WHOLE BUNCH of ways to make a girl suffer :)

And congratulations for making the club, as you're now a member of the Reviews section. The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.

---------------

interrogationmaster: The reason so many of the database pictures are down is because AOL, our host for all the pictures in the database, deleted access to our free space in late October, which means we lost nearly everything in all the databases.

YouTied stepped in to rescue us by allowing us to use their free space, so I've been slowly restoring all the missing files to the databases. Right now I'm working to restore the Rape sections, since they are the biggest and the most work, then I'll continue on the other databases afterward. It takes a long time since there are literally thousands of files I have to replace, and I don't have a lot of free time. If you check out the 2 rape databases, you'll see working links on probably 75% of them right now.

Hey, just out of curiosity... Does anyone in here ever purchase and/or read adult themed e-Books? I have been a reader of adult e-books for a few years now. Often, I prefer reading an e-book over watching a GIMP video. When reading, I can often play the scene in my imagination. My current collection contains almost 100 separate titles. More than 60% of those books are ones I have already read and finished. About a dozen separate authors are represented among my e-book collection, but my two favorite authors go by the names "Jay Merson" and "Argus".

Anyone else in here read adult themed e-books? I wouldn't mind sharing my favorite titles and the sites I currently buy from if anyone is interested.

I am a voracious reader, but I have yet to purchase or read an e-book (erotic or otherwise). I just like the feel of an actual book in my hands, plus I like the look of my library. I'm kind of a snob in that respect, I guess. I'm just curious, though. Where do you buy (or download) your adult e-books?

-----

Rqalphus, Greek God of GIMP: Yes, by Zeus, it pisses the HELL out of me that modern filmmakers waste time on male torture. It is one of the reasons I haven't bothered watching many recent horror movie franchises. I long for the nudity-and-illicit-sex-then-gruesome-murder sequence of the early Halloween or Friday the 13th movies. I would even settle for the "erotic thriller" sensibility of the 1980s. But it is the rare mainstream movie that catches my attention any more.

As a result, I have largely given up on mainstream movies and now spend more time on downloading from specialized membership sites. As a consequence, I tend to favor downloads over DVD purchases as well. As you have no doubt noticed.

It is a disappointing and frustrating state of affairs. It is why I despair of anyone remaking I Spit on your Grave and it being even as good as the original. Except, I suppose, the revenge killings of the rapists might be more explicit in a remake. Now that male torture is in vogue.

I hope that Attackers will bring back the more popular actresses to headline this series like Maria Ozawa or the newly recruited Asami Ogawa.

Now that Asami Ogawa is appearing in Attackers movies, there does seem to support for the idea of her doing a New Slave Island movie. I noticed a thread on ScanLover Forum where someone made the same argument.

I don't really follow the rankings for JAV stars but it's never been my sense that the top names have appeared in Slave Island movies. I'm thinking the biggest star to appear in the original Slave Island series was probably either Yuka Haneda in Slave Island 5 or Ayumu Kase in Slave Island 7. Without a doubt, the biggest "name" in the New Slave Island series was Bunko Kanazawa in the first one, although she was past her prime at that point.

In any event, I would also welcome a New Slave Island movie with Asami, if it ever happened. And if Maria Ozawa ever finds her way back to Attackers movies, I would welcome a New Slave Island film with her, too.

Generally at least one new clip and one new photset per week. The models are cute, the strangles are fairly decent, and there's often a nice "death thump". It's one of the few subscription snuff sites left (EWP and Catharsis are the only others I can think of, although suzyfight might be subscription), so if you want a lot of clips, it's a decent way to go.

Peachy Keen (available from NicheClips) has the best models, some of the best deaths and the BEST videography by far -- if the budget is a problem, check out Chris' Corner.

Psycho-Terror (also on NicheClips) do a few decent clips, but their quality is up and down.

Hope this helps.

====================================

Speaking of websites that this crowd might like, has anyone tried Attackers.tv or its associated sites? It seems like it might be a good option for those who like Attackers or Slave Island movies. (see linked website).

====================================

One of my latest thoughts is how cool it would be to lie a girl on a bed, cuff her hands behind the wrought-iron headboard and tie her hair somewhat loosely to the headboard. When you punch her stomach, her head is going to fly up, her hair will grab and she'll get a one-two of pain. It would be hard to do without actually hurting the model, but it makes a fun fantasy!

1) I wonder if their are two "uncut" versions of Rest Stop 2? I remember watching it on a rental from Blockbuster and the scene being very brief, almost a "blinker". I purchased it because oh WTF, Jessie Ward is hot. Well the Uncut version I purchased the scene seems much longer. I timed it today, The first scene when the male is tortured (which cuts back and forth to her watching, tied, and screaming) is 1:20, The second scene, which is quite graphic and shows her being tortured twice with a power drill in the leg is 1:30. That is a fairly long female torture scene by mainstream standards.

2) VM, could you please do us Japanese fans a big favor? If you know the name of the actress or actresses featured in a film could you please make us aware of them. Many of us like some actresses so much that we would purchase stuff that wouldn't normally interest us as much because of a specific actress.

3) I have recently discovered Tina Yuzaki or "Rio". Can anyone suggest any GIMP worthy movies she appears in?

4) Is their any future for those of us with our taste who prefer to watch movies on a real TV screen vs. our 13" laptop screens? Getting especially Zen or Giga movies on DVD can be a real ordeal at times. Or can someone recommend a file convertor that would convert downloads to DVD format?

And now one of those reviews I've been promising. This one is GIGA THP-26. I had been watching this one on the Giga home page for a while, trying to figure out if I should take the plunge, placing and ordering it from Japan. When it showed up on the VM Sept update it was a no brainer.

The movie starts like most typical Giga movies. The super-heroine star in this case is taller then most Japanese actresses and fairly well endowed. Her name is Roe Sumikowa. The first scene starts out with her successfully taking on a group of Ninjas with some decent sword fighting. Her moves look OK, and not totally fake. Her outfit which is basically a bikini on the upper body with tight pants with fishnets is far better then some of the Giga heroines. It ends with a gremlin type figure watching a video of the previous fight.

In the next scene the ninjas are chasing someone when she appears to the rescue again. Then the gremlin type figure shows up to fight. One of his hands is a gremlin head, this flaw really wrecks the fight scene. She is overcome by some type of gas that the gremlin sprays on her that appears to choke her. She is severely weakened by the attack. She is attacked by the ninjas again and in her weakened state is beaten with crotch kicks, punches, stomach punches. She is subdued. Overall a B+.

She awakens with her arms tied behind her back and a horizontal rod holding her up, with the gremlin creature in front of her. A ninja with electric gloves walks up behind her and she is tortured with electro shock. The scene is fairly realistic although the method of applying the electricity seems a bit fake. Then the gremlin creature attacks her with his gremlin hand. She is dazed and staggering at the end, something Giga does well with most of their victims. All in all I'll give this sequence a B+ too; if they had used real looking stun guns or a fist for the beating it would have been much more realistic.

In the next scene, she awakens, is slapped around a bit by the Gremlin creature and then too weak to resist is molested by the two men she came to rescue. She regains enough power to escape and wounded, she staggers away. The Gremlin creature catches up to her and grabs her in a bear hug as she fades to unconsciousness. Nothing special, a C-.

She then awakes in the hands of the ninjas who are molesting her and the Gremlin stands in front of her while the ninjas hold her and he ejaculates on her with his massive Gremlin member which seems to burn her. He then starts biting at her clothing with his gremlin hand. Then he rapes her from behind while the ninjas hold her down, at this point she still has most of her clothing. She then writhes around on the floor in pain until she passes out. Well, I'll give this one a B, loses points for too much clothing.

When she wakes up two of the ninjas are tearing her top of her and molesting her; she appears too weak to resist. She has a spectacular set, as good as any I've seen. Then they proceed to take turns raping her while they hold her down sort of. At the end she appears too spent to resist and even ends up masturbating at the request of her captors. She does finally escape but I won't spoil the plot, because I know how many of us watch these flicks for the fine dialog and acting.

All in all I'd give it an A-. Pluses, unlike most GIGA flicks the heroine loses almost all of her costume, she's a rather convincing victim, the sex never appears consensual, and she's pleasing to the eyes. Minuses, the violent sections lose some points for the implements used, and the gremlin hand was almost comedic.

I will note, however, that I wish I had you figuring my GPA when I was in school. You gave the overall feature an A-, but the highest any of the individual clips were graded was a B+. I guess this was one of those cases where the whole was greater than the sum of the parts? Or it had a kick-ass ending that you avoided mentioning for fear of spoiling the ending. I can respect that.

-----

Speaking of Bizarro Video, I am slowly going through the movies I downloaded while I was a member. Many of them were very disappointing, but some of the disappointing ones still had something that made them almost worthwhile. This one had the awesome Desiree Cousteau in kind of a gang rape scene. It has a brief description in the Rape Scenes in Adult Movies database, which actually makes it sound a little GIMP-ier than it is. Here is my take on it.

-----

Pretty Peaches (1978)

This was one of the movies I downloaded while I was a member of Bizarro Video in late 2008. The web site purports to be the "Home of the REAL ROUGH XXX and CULT GRINDHOUSE FILMS!" and while I am more interested in the REAL ROUGH XXX aspect of their movies, I occasionally mistakenly watch a CULT GRINDHOUSE FILM instead. Alas, such is the case with Pretty Peaches.

We pick up immediately with two good 'ol boys screeching to a halt in front of a dilapidated gas station. The passenger gets out and gives the driver a hard time for turning off the engine. The driver cranks it back up while the passenger opens the hood and sticks his head under it, then pulls his head back out and smacks the side of the car. The driver gets out and tells him not to hit his car as the passenger walks off and comes back with a water hose. He spashes water onto the driver's boots, who gets all upset and takes the hose away and fills up a canteen. Cut to the dufus in the gas station, who bears a passing resemblance to the dim-witted guy from I Spit on Your Grave (maybe it's just the hat), who gets all upset that these guys are wasting water because don't they know there's a water shortage? Like they could give a shit. There is the threat of redneck violence until a Jeep comes screeching to a halt and Desiree Cousteau, in a bright orange outfit that is struggling vainly to cover her crotch and has totally given up on covering her luscious butt, hops out and brightly asks if they can check her oil. Wink-wink nudge-nudge.

The camera spends a lot of time documenting Desiree Cousteau's ability to bounce and sashay and generally act like a clueless slut. And Desiree has never looked sluttier, in her bright orange short-shorts and too-high heels. Watching her just in these few introductory minutes takes me back to the Golden Age of Porn. *sigh*

She goes to the Ladies' Room. The dufus wipes down her windshield and sniffs her car seat. She returns dressed in a short pink dress and announces she's going to her Daddy's wedding. We see her Daddy (played by John Leslie) with his slutty bride-to-be, Lilly (played by Flower, who the IMDB tells me was only in two movies and somehow also the Legends of Porn compilation). We see Peaches (Desiree Cousteau) driving to town. Cut to credits, which is just the title (Alex de Renzy's Pretty Peaches).

Daddy gets married. Peaches arrives at the end of the ceremony. They all step next door and feed coins into slot machines. Peaches drinks too much and drives off upset. Why is not clear. She drives off the road right where the two good 'ol boys from the intro scene are trying to start their car, out in the big middle of nowhere. She stumbles out of the Jeep and collapses. The good 'ol boys find her and wonder what to do. Give me a break.

One of the guys decides to check for a heartbeat, so he slips his hand down the front of her dress, cups her breast, and announces that she's alive. The other guy wants to be sure, so he pulls her bodice down to expose her breast and, umm, feels for a heartbeat. They compare notes and conclude that since both of them feel a heartbeat--the second guy for quite a while longer than the first guy--she must be alive. What to do, what to do.

They decide maybe they should loosen her clothes because one guy saw that once on TV. Probably Dukes of Hazzard. They loosen her top until her breasts are exposed. They decide her panties are way too tight, and need to come off.

They admire her pussy. One guy does some exploring with his tongue, then explores her pussy with his cock. He explores her thoroughly and repeatedly and she stays passed out the entire time. Until she reaches up and grabs his butt and pulls him into her harder. And licks her lips. And kisses him back. This would have been so much better if she had waken up screaming and struggling and crying rape.

It turns out Peaches has amnesia. Poor Peaches. They offer to take her with them in "their Jeep" and off they go, to San Francisco.

Back to Daddy and his slutty bride, who is whining about the flea bag motel in which she is spending her honeymoon. Daddy is worried about Peaches. Lilly comes out in an orange lingerie outfit. Alex de Renzy must like the color orange. What follows is an uninspiring XXX sex scene. Flower looks kind of like a tranny, but apparently she is not. This part reminds me why I don't actually miss the Golden Age of Porn all that much. (There's lots of hair, too, and you know how I feel about copious body, facial and pubic hair.)

The Jeep arrives in San Francisco. Peaches is in a different dress, having evidently changed on the road in the open-topped Jeep, I guess. They send her into a building to see their uncle to get her memory back. She is pulled into a bathroom by Uncle Percy, who looks like a blond-haired Weird Al Yankovic. The following scene is supposed to be slapstick humor, I'm sure. And to the sound of slapstick movie music, Uncle Percy bends Desiree Cousteau over the sink and gives her an enema. She even holds the tube up her ass. When he pulls it out, she squirts herself empty. But she didn't get her memory back.

Peaches goes home with the redneck guys. Daddy and her slutty bride get home and we meet Katia, the maid (played by Juliet Anderson), in her French Maid outfit. Katia is not happy about the new mistress of the house. We suffer through another XXX sex scene with Daddy and Lilly, but Katia joins in. There is also typical 70s porn soundtrack music to deal with.

Peaches is in bed with the redneck twins and keeps getting annoyed that they are always feeling her up. She gets out of bed and the guys fight. Peaches reads the classifieds and finds an ad for exotic dancing.

Cut to Peaches' audition. She strips for the club owner. He gives her a torn slip, she puts it on, and he tells her the audition begins now. Peaches decides maybe she doesn't want the job, but two more gals come in and talk about how Peaches has been a bad girl and needs to be punished. And it has taken 48 minutes to get to this point.

Peaches is pushed back onto a round padded stage or bed or something, struggling and fighting all the while. She is held down while one guy (or girl) eats her out. Meanwhile, the club owner is taking money as people file in to watch. By the time everyone backs away, Peaches has her wrists chained out to the sides and up, and her ankles are chained up in the air with her legs spread. She struggles nicely, and cries out and acts like she knows what's coming next. (We hope she's right, but we are destined to be disappointed.)

One girl sits on her face and forces her to munch carpet. A one point, in fact, the girl takes hold of her own pussy lips and spreads them open and it looks like she could have covered the whole bottom half of Desiree Cousteau's face if she had tried hard enough. Kind of yuck, unless huge gaping pussies are your thing.

The other girl pushes a rubber dildo inside Peaches' pussy. There's a lot of orgy type action that goes on. And on. It is chaotic at best. No one actually fucks the bound and helpless Peaches, though. At the climax of the action, I think we are supposed to believe that they forced a large rubber cock the size of a small python up Peaches' pussy, but come on. This is XXX sex. If they had shoved that into her, we would have seen it. And we didn't. The scene concludes with Peaches crying out (kind of whining loudly), still chained to the bed, while the players file out. Very unsatisfying as gang rape scenes go. No gags were used, although I got tired enough of her whining that I was wishing they would employ one.

When Peaches gets back to the redneck twins, they have each hooked up with their own blonde. More XXX sex. All consensual. Ho hum. After the boring sex, Peaches storms out in a light blue (or lavender maybe) halter top and bright green satin shorts (I guess they couldn't afford a competent wardrobe person). We see her walking across the grass in her high heels, but we hear loafers on pavement. (I guess they couldn't afford a competent sound person, either.)

More insipid plot, in which Peaches hooks up with a psychiatrist who has sex with her. There is kind of a notable orgy scene with everyone rolling around in oil. Desiree Cousteau looks hot all oiled up. It is all consensual sex, unfortunately, except that it ends up with Peaches sucking her Daddy's cock. I saw THAT one coming (so to speak). Peaches gets her memory back (I will resist the urge to say that it just suddenly came to her), and hugs her naked oiled-up Daddy in the middle of the orgy. I guess it's a good thing she's dating a psychiatrist.

So, in summary, there's a scene where an unconscious Desiree Cousteau is undressed and fucked by the redneck guy, although in her semi-conscious state toward the end she is enthusiastically involved. It would have been better, of course, if it had been a forcible rape. There's the kind of forced enema scene, complete with a gushing finale. Then there's the bondage gang rape scene, which wasn't all that bad except that the most that happened to her was that she was eaten out and was smothered by a HUGE pussy. No guys fucked her at all. I'm not even sure a gal with a strap-on fucked her. So it was technically a rape scene, although thoroughly unsatisfying. But she did look nice chained naked with her legs spread up in the air. And then there was the incest scene. Personally, incest scenes don't do much for me. But Desiree Cousteau did look kind of hot all oiled up.

So one kind of unconscious rape and one unsatisfying bondage gang rape. One kind of forced enema. As a GIMP movie, this gets a D+. As a funky 70s XXX cult flick, it would score higher.

I found one copy of Pretty Peaches at Amazon.com and more at XPloitedCinema.com.

As for your earlier posts:

I use Adobe Premiere Elements to make DVDs. It converts downloaded files to DVD and is quite easy to use for compilations. You can also rip scenes from DVDs and convert them into WMV, AVI, MPEG etc. files for Internet usage. I believe it also lets you create vidcaps, but I haven't tried that yet. However, I have to convert RealMedia files in a separate program before I can use the clips to make DVDs. Another complaint is that Premiere Elements freezes up on occasion, but that may be a problem with my POS computer.

Have you tried hooking up your computer to your TV and using that as a monitor?

As for "Rest Stop 2," I'm quite sure I saw the same uncut scene as you did. I'd give it a B at the most mainly because of the wasted potential. I didn't care too much for the rest of the movie.

----------

Rqalphus, the Greek God of GIMP: Based in no scientific research whatsoever, I think the standard ratio for number of guy to girl torture scenes in a movie is 4:1, with the overall duration of such footage being 7:1. Another problem these days is that movies can show eyeballs being ripped out and intestines being munched on, but the women don't get naked in front of the camera, not even a bare ass. At least in the old days, the viewer was almost guaranteed some nudity.

----------

John Galt wrote: ... I despair of anyone remaking I Spit on your Grave and it being even as good as the original.

I had earlier said that I expected the remake to be just as brutal. My reasoning was based on the fact that the original was famous for the controversy it created at the time. CineTel, which is doing the remake, seems to have made a bunch of obscure sci-fi/horror movies. My guess would be that they want to make a name for themselves by being just as controversial as the original ISOYG.

However, the remake of "The Shining" wasn't scary at all, and the "Pink Panther" movie with Steve Martin failed to make me laugh (or even smile). You're probably right that the new ISOYG will be a disappointment, but a GIMPer can dream, can't he?

Speaking of remakes of controversial movies, I see someone is doing Last House on the Left.

As for "Pretty Peaches," I saw that film many many years ago. You summed up my exact feelings about the movie. A very forgettable affair indeed.

----------

HC Keys: Feel free to interrupt at anytime, especially with info on a ring-gagged woman in a movie. Unfortunately, that appears to be the only GIMP scene in "Unborn" if the trailer is any indication. It does look like a fairly slick and creepy movie, however.

----------

Mirage wrote: I am fine with lack of originality. Porn is repetitive. Looking back, my problem with this movie are the actresses.

I had the opposite problem with the "Slave Island" series, at least the ones that I saw. I liked almost all the actresses but got tired of the jail-like setting in those movies. Also, I enjoy torture more than rape.

----------

Ed: For GIMP stuff, I prefer visual images to literary works. Or maybe I'm just too lazy. But I do enjoy some of the writing, such as Jefferson's, that have been linked to this site.

----------

jhlipton: I've gotten that error for about 30% of my posts. (I guess many others here are in the same boat considering all the double-posts that appear.) It seems that the messages go through, but either take forever to appear or need another post to "bump" them onto this forum.

Another Dreambook-related question: Does anyone else get that blank page with the nondescript message "scram!" at the top after they hit the "Return to the Forum" link?" Or is Rqalphus just trying to send a message to people who feel the need to respond to too many posts at one go?

Slave Island should bring in the piss at face or piss in mouth scenes. Add in more slapping, gags that should only be off when giving a BJ. Dog Bowl scenes that can extend for 2 minutes rather than 15 secs.

I seen harder stuffs in JAV than Slave Island series.

As for remakes, yes, I dream as well. I hope for the best, but I expect the worst. That way I am rarely disappointed and occasionally surprised.

GIMP movies?

The Japanese are the ultimate GIMPERS, they're not going to let a hot little cock socket like Tina get away unscathed.

Would you?

Head of Max-A Company "Tina, millions of guys want to see you raped, including myself, so that's going to occur in many of your movies, ok?"

Tina "Um, I guess so."

Tina's Gimp movies:

http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?id=SRXV484
http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=srxv615
http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=xv506
http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=xv380
http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=srxv620
http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=xv556
http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=xv462
http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=xv417
http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=xv401

Simple! Beautiful women love to have orgasms like any human does; it's built into their genes! Bondage enables them to climb to the top of their orgasms -- and, many times over.

Men do not have that innate ability to achieve multiple orgasms. Many women have on average three or four great orgasms during a bondage session.

An old Chinese method of multiple orgasms was the infamous "Saki Bath." A willing woman would permit being tied down, unable to move. The man would sprinkle warm saki upon her tightly bound body, and licked-off by tongue. Wherever the saki landed, his job was to lick her body clean before the sheets were wet.

If you haven't tried it, don't knock it!!! Rather, try it yourselves. Then, write me and let me know how great it was... Ciao

-----

elkcreek: Thanks for the review of Giga THP-26. I definitely want to check out a Giga movie sometime soon but I'm not certain it will be this title. It seems a little silly to me. I think I would prefer one of the titles Dr. Yuya clipped on YouTied that had some powerful whipping scenes.

Meanwhile, I forgot to respond Sunday to your question about converting files. I recently downloaded a system called Movavi. The upside to this system is that it is very user friendly. Even someone who's a bit of a dummy on the computer (i.e., me) can easily figure out how to use it effectively. The downside is it isn't free. It costs about $60 US to buy. However, there is a free 30-day trial period if you wanted to test it.

Furthermore, I find a written gimp-scene even more arousing due to the fact, that there is a story, a plot that has driven the hapless girl into the horrible situation of being the helpless captive of some vicious sadist(s).

My favorite novels being those published by "Star Distributors" way back in the late eighties or early nineties under the publishing line "Spread For Danger". Those were fanciful tales of mostly haughty, arrogant American babes being captured/kidnapped abroad (Russia, Thailand, Japan) and run through the mill of rape and torture. I´ve even owned one of those books as paperback way back when I was fourteen or fifteen years old, and clearly that novel "fucked me up" for good.

The cost of those paperbacks is insanely high, being collector´s items. So, I too buy my books online and got most of the "Spread For Danger" series in my collection as ebooks. Those were in fact written by John Argus way back and he still is my favorite author of sadistic fiction.

I wouldn´t mind hearing from you by mail, if you like.

The problem I am having is that I want to genuinely replicate such a novel. So, the question in my mind is how pornographic should I allow it to get?

I think the best thing is to do a fully pornographic version and an edited, legitimate novel version.

Further, I am having a problem with deciding on the set up. So many abduction of women fantasies, it is hard to settle on just one. Oh well, I'm still thinking.

I remember Star Distributors, and some of their contemporaries like Greenleaf. I had a small handful of titles including "Harding Fetish Files: Kidnapped Virgins" and "Rape '70"

Sadly, I don't have them anymore and I'd found only a few collectors copies out there with very high prices. I'd love to know where I could get e-book versions.

It involves a young babysitter tied up and held prisoner by a group of children who rape and torture her. For the entire book. The author wrote only the one novel, then died in 1976.

For a fairly good review of the book, check out this review. For the gory and titillating details, click the link at the bottom of the review for the spoilers review. (Or, just click here, although I recommend reading the intro first.)

What I wouldn't give to see this novel made into a movie that was faithful to the book. This might be the book you're looking for, DHT.

Sorry, I meant to post sooner but too many real life activities and a lack of sleep are not a good combination.

Dreambook problems: The error message everybody gets, seemingly every single bleeping time, is a Dreambook glitch that we've had to deal with for the past 3 or 4 months. They know about it because I've sent them enough angry e-mails, but that doesn't mean it's been fixed yet. Just remember if you get it, it doesn't mean your post hasn't gone through. Indeed, if you go back and try again, all that does is result in multiple posts. We haven't lost one yet.

----------------

I'm a bit late, but thanks to both Elkcreek and John Galt for their respective reviews. I've said it before, but it's worth repeating that we have the best crew of online reviewers in cyberspace all congregated here on our little discussion forum.

Elkcreek: Like Canadian, I'm always intrigued when you write about those Giga films. Science fiction/fantasy isn't normally a genre I'm interested in, but the tortures you describe do sound exciting, particularly the electro ones. Couple that with some damn cute women and I would say they sound worthy of checking out. I'm thisclose to placing an order.

The direct link to your latest review is http://zfxetc.tripod.com/reviews/japanreviews/jap_gigathp26.htm

----------------

John Galt: As always, another fine and humorous review. I've only seen a small percentage of those Golden Age pornos with rape themes from the 1970s and 80s, and it's good to know that even though they are considered classics, they weren't necessarily all especially good films. Desiree Cousteau was a definite hotty, though. If you would like to see her actually tied up and raped, seek out an old title called Getting Off. She's bound in a standing spread-eagle and raped from behind. I collected footage of that on my very first compilation tape back in the mid-80s when I used to work in video stores. Here's the page from Rape Scenes in Adult Movies Database: Getting Off.

Direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.

----------------

Bondage stories: Oh, I've still got quite a real-life collection of those wonderful paperbacks, and an even bigger online collection of those great covers. I might grace the board with a few as the daily picture after this current Dan Hawke series finishes up in the next few days. In the meantime, check out this site that has a lot of the covers and the actual stories preserved for the Internet generation. I could spend hours reading the stories and looking at the pictures on this site. Check it out: xNovel.

John Galt mentioned "Let's Go Play at the Adams'". If any of you haven't read this book, seek it out immediately. It was a bondage novel thinly disguised as an actual mainstream book, and it is, along with "The Girl Next Door", one of my two all-time favorite reads. My ex-girlfriend told me about it back in the 1980s and I had to go to one of those rare booksearching places (it was out of print then, and probably still is now) to locate a copy. The guy who wrote would surely hang out here if he hadn't passed away. The bondage detail he writes about is AMAZING. And it even has a snuff ending that I still have wet dreams about. Highly recommended.

And ironically, LGPATA was made into a movie, or at least it was the inspiration for an old bondage film starring Sally Roberts. I just saw it for the first time on Sunday. It was called Only a Game and Sally (who looks a bit like the Barbara character from the novel cover anyway) got bound in many of the same positions. For such a relatively mild film, I found myself enjoying it quite a bit. I have no idea if a print even exists anymore (it was an old B&D Pleasures release), but it was an entertaining watch.

elkcreek - always enjoy Giga reviews - nice job.

John Galt - ditto on the "Pretty Peaches" - I recall seeing it many years ago and with that memory refresher I concur with your grade - when I first saw your screen name when you began posting here I thought I recognized it from somewhere but couldn't place it - in a rare moment of complete sobriety this weekend, it came to me - is that name inspired by a protagonist in "Atlas Shrugged" - just wondering.

Let's start the new week off with a movie review (or synopsis if you like)

Today, we will examine "Video Pirates 3". This is a ZFX effort from 1995. Starring Kelly McKay, Candi Licks, Rick Masters, Travis Lee and Harlan Broadway. Run time is 74 minutes. I obtained my copy from Video Mayhem at the above link.

We begin with a recap of events leading up to this episode.

Rick's sister Allysha has been lured to a night alley setting where she is abducted. Quickly bound, she's shoved into a van and taken to the Video Pirates diabolical lair. Bound wrists behind and tape gagged she is hustled into the shop, forced to her knees and fondled by a henchman. Now face up on the floor her legs are spread for some diddling, then a few ass slaps. Lifted to her feet the gag is removed for some further fondling and verbal threats.

Allysha is now naked except for heels, arms shackled outstretched, ankles secured to floor with legs spread, cleave gagged and c-clamps on nipples while Uncle Fester takes some photos. Enter the henchman for some cat lashing. The clamps are removed for easier lashing access. Uncle Fester orders the whipping be stepped up until she is a mass of welts. They take more photos to send to brother Rick as she writhes in her restraints.

She has now been retied, spreadeagled face up on floor, cleave gag with pussy and nipples wired for shocks. The henchman gives her some jolts as she pleads with him to stop. Meanwhile, Rick gets a call and hears the suffering of sis. He goes to the Yellow Pages, contacts a P.I. service and sets a meeting. He meets the P.I., Dee Dee Chase, at a local eatery and explains the situation and she agrees to take the case.

Allysha has been retied standing, wrists in front and to her knees, ankles secured to a board and body wrapped under the breasts. She is rope gagged and noosed to the ceiling. The henchman gives her a lashing and ass slaps. He removes the noose and forces her to her knees for some spankings. The noose is reattached and she is ratcheted upward. She is rebound AOH and lifted up and a ball gag inserted. In walks our intrepid P.I. to find Allysha swinging in the air. As Dee Dee begins to lower her she is surprised and overpowered by the henchman. He cleave gags and cuffs her wrists behind. She gets a good fondling, has her clothing removed and is taken to the Video Pirate boss.

Back downstairs she is ball gagged, wrists bound behind and upper body corded, knees and ankles bound and corded to the ceiling and ratchet. The henchman lashes her until she's welted up then attaches clothes pins to nipples. He questions her purpose in being there and continues the whipping. Her nipples are fondled and lashed. A bit of pussy diddling and nipple biting follow. The ball gag is removed and a dildo inserted. Gag back in and she's left to squirm.

She is now tied sitting on the floor, arms outstretched, legs spread and elevated. Her pussy is pinned and electric current is juiced into her pussy. Hot wax is dripped on her boobs. A hose device is inserted in her mouth and liquid pumped in as she gags repeatedly. In the meantime Allysha has been bound AOH to overhead pipe, one leg tied and elevated. To be continued. The End.

Movie Pluses - both models are certainly pleasing to the eye - nice variety of position and torments - especially liked Candi choking on the liquid - while not stellar performances from the ladies, sound and workman like.

Movie Minuses - for some reason Rick chose to shoot this in low light conditions - ok, but would have liked it turned up some - thought both ladies could sell the electro a bit more

The Verdict - while not spectacular by ZFX standards, it is a solid production.

My Grade: B

Regarding the Video Pirates series, I have to admit that so far I'm not that excited about it. There's no doubt that Video Pirates 3 co-star Candi Licks was one of the most attractive performers to appear in ZFX movies, but as I have said before, her performances never quite satisfied my expectations.

As for Pretty Peaches, I think John Galt is right. It probably works better as a '70s nostalgia piece than as a GIMP movie.

arrakur: I have never purchased paperback books, mainly because there are no longer any brick and mortar sellers in my local area that have them. There was one some fifteen to twenty years ago that had paperback books, but it went out of bussiness over a decade ago. Also because of the fact that paperbacks require physical storage space and there is always the danger that your collection might be stumbled upon by those you would rather not know about them.

Ralphus: Hey Man, thanks for the link to xNovels. I followed your link and took a brief "check it out" type look. So far at first glance, I think I am going to find plenty worth downloading there. Gotta go back to a closer more indepth look later.

For anyone who is interested, there are two main websites I purchase my ebooks from. The links to them are below. Note, both links open in a new window.

A1 Adult Ebooks

BDSM Books

Does anyone remember what was the name of that horror novel which contains, as part of one of the character's backstory, a brutal homage to LGPATA, and who wrote it? I can't remember for the life of me. I don't think I'd read it again, but it is bothering me that I can't remember.

Alright, what do people think about this bizarre youtube phenomenon of girls making videos of themselves duct taping their mouths shut?

-----

Sloth: Yes, I loved Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged, and John Galt as the ultimate individualist. Rand's philosophical belief that individual greed and a total disregard for others is the best way to achieve a healthy society is insane, of course, but the novel was very entertaining. And John Galt gets to sleep with Angelina Jolie in the upcoming movie. I should be so lucky.

Video Pirates 3 sounds fairly entertaining. Thanks for the review. I need to expand my ZFX library, so I appreciate all of the in-depth ZFX reviews greatly.

-----

Ralphus: I was kind of interested in looking up Only a Game until you described it as relatively mild. Heck. I want a faithful movie version. As if that's going to ever happen.

I like the xNovel web site. I'll have to download a few of those covers for my archives. Thanks.

I think I saw Getting Off back in the day. The vidcaps look very familiar. But sadly I don't seem to have recorded the scene for my video archives. Oh well. Something else to put on my "Keep an eye out for this" list.

I love that cover from LGPATA, but it always bothered me that her hand was free and the ropes were so loose. But oh well. The book kicked ass.

Justine - The version directed by Chris Boger with Koo Stark as Justine has two pathetic whipping scenes. In the first a woman is whipped tied on a bed by an idiot on cocaine. This is only a minor scene. In another very brief scene Juliet is whipped clothed while tied to a bed. Her friend bursts in and stops it and we only see two strokes. This whipping is rubbish not only is it really brief the sound and image sync go miles out.

John Galt - I was unaware that a film of "Atlas" is finally being made. And your namesake taps Angelina you say. I smell a sequel coming, something like "Ralphus Gimped". At least in the case of females he fits the "total disregard for others" portion. I guess John Galt would be appointed "Gimp Czar" and keep all the chicks in bondage for himself. Cool.

I think Jessica Alba would happily read for a female lead in such a film. I would certainly volunteer my services in any capacity.

Had never heard of LGPATA but a few checks and that book is available from a variety of sources and sure sounds like fun. That would make one helluva Gimp film, no?

Stay Well All

A new DVD has been released that seems to be aimed at GIMPers. The three-movies-in-one DVD has the women in prison films Chained Heat, Red Heat and Jungle Warriors. I'm somewhat indifferent to the first movie and have never seen the second one, but I am definitely interested in the third movie, based on the clip from Jungle Warriors that was on YouTied.

So why would this be bad news? Well, because I read an online review of this disc that covered the first film in the set and it seems that movie has been seriously edited. Oddly enough, one of the rape scenes from the movie has been edited from the main feature but included on the disc as a deleted scene.

I don't know if anyone else has seen this disc but it would be helpful to know if the highlights from Jungle Warriors have been removed. If so, I am much less interested in this DVD.

Ed: Yes, I love e-books. There are a few free samples that I have collected here and there. It is fun to color in the scenes the way I want them to look. I even write some of my own. Thanks for the links.

DHT: You-Tube rocks! The duct taping (and other antics) provide hours of cheap entertainment. I'm with you on this one.

A Canadian: I don't remember if you posted it or not, but do you know the title of the Japanese video on You-Tied that involved the chair tie and hot sauce treatment?

-----

Ironman: Yes, I was the one who posted that clip on YouTied and I do know the name of the film -- it was Attackers JBD-079, starring Mika Shiina. Ralphus knows it, as well -- it was his favorite film from 2005.

---------------

Sloth: No sooner had I posted yesterday about us having the best gang of reviewers posting here then you follow it up with yet another review, thank you very much. I think a grade of B for Video Pirates 3 is about right. Personally, I liked all 5 of the volumes (it's been re-edited down to 4 for DVD), and I don't think you can go wrong with any of them. Rick shot some really good footage for that series. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure a lot of the action you described in your review originally appeared in Volume 4...Kelly McKay being hung up suspended, rescued by Candi Licks and then Candi's treatment with the hot wax are all in my VP4 highlights. Obviously, Rick did some major restructuring of the story elements, as I noted when I reviewed Part 2 last month.

BTW, it looks like Part 1 is now the only one from the Video Pirates series that doesn't have an official GIMP review here. Who's going to help us complete the series?

The link to your latest review is in my Homepage URL above.

---------------

Nicho: Thanks for the latest addition to the Whipping Scenes in Movies Database, and for the additional info and caps you've supplied me with via e-mail. I'll be adding them soon.

---------------

A Canadian: Thanks for the heads up on the Women's Prison DVD set. That's absolutely disgusting that they would butcher those movies for DVD. I mean, what the hell?! The stuff they were cutting out is the whole reason why people would want to see a women's prison film in the first place!

I hate to say it, but in some cases the only way to see a film uncut is to get hold of the original VHS. I found a rare DVD collector's edition of Jess Franco's The Demons not long ago. It was a beautiful print, but even though it boasted that it was 31 minutes longer, it was still missing some naked medieval torture sequences that I collected from the VHS tape 20 years ago. Where's the pristine restored version of that footage? Not on this DVD. What a pisser.

---------------

John Galt: It's Only a Game (I left the first word out of the title before) is definitely mild, yeah. She doesn't even get naked. I still enjoyed it because it was faithful to the book as far as the bondage goes. Watching her get tied up the exact same way they tied up Barbara made me wish that someone had the balls to buy up the rights to the story and make it into a real movie. My God, that would be the greatest mainstream film ever for bondage enthusiasts. But we're dreaming. Look how they sanitized The Girl Next Door. True, that film had the book's drama but little of the voyeuristic thrills that it should have. To do it right, you'd have to have a naked actress tied up alongside actual children. No studio would ever touch a project like that.

I saw some talk about old adult classics and want to share a site I recently found - http://neatopotato.net/xnovel/. This site has free downloadable copies of hundreds of adult novels, incl Greenleaf classics.

But this is not!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErRJcWV4ynM

First, High School Uniform and Machine Gun. Well, one of my beefs with Japanese movies is the definition of "rape and abduction". It's not a rape and abduction if the girl puts up zero resistance and is not held down. Especially if she acts like she enjoys it. In other words, if a girl says "No, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.........." it's not a rape, sorry. The other complaint I have about this flick is that this is a younger Tina, almost too young. I know Japanese girls tend to look young for her age, but if someone told me she was fourteen when she made this picture I wouldn't be surprised. All in all it was not Gimp worthy by any standard. I give it an F! Don't waste your time.

http://vinfo.xcity.jp/english/info.html?ID=srxv615

The next one I'm going to review is called Rio Teacher Hunting. It has some big plusses, first she is a bit older, although she still looks young, at least I don't feel like Namba member looking at it. She has grown up and she is extremely hot. The movie starts out with her as a soccer coach? And she gets raped in the locker room by one of the players. The scene is pretty good, she seems to resist, and her acting is convincing. She never gets fully nude in this scene (her T-shirt remains on). My only complaint with this scene is it follows the traditional Japanese rape scenario: 1) Eat at the Y 2) Get her to suck you off 3) Have sex with her. I find these scenarios a bit unrealistic. I can't imagine a rapist with the first goal of pleasuring the girl, followed by trusting the victim with his member in her mouth, followed by sex. To me it's illogical.

The next scene is a vanilla sex scene with a fellow teacher. No Gimp worthy material here.

The next scene is a somewhat believable gang rape scene that lasts a long time (a good 2/5 of the movie). In this scene she is stripped (her shirt stays on but is pulled back), held in numerous positions and assaulted. This occurs in some kind of a supply room that she was sent to clean up. The men wear ski masks to hide their identity which adds to the effect. She seems to resist fairly admirably but not as much as Ayumi Kase in Shark Special 35. I think the scene would have benefited from a bit more rough play, perhaps a stomach punch or a couple of slaps. Having said all this Rio is fucking gorgeous when she is held down, stretched out, assaulted and resisting. She is tied, but it is a weak tie with a sweater. While this scene follows the traditional Jap Rape scenario I talked about in the first scene, it is much more believable. I'll give it a C+; if it was any other girl it might be a D-. Worth checking out because of the talent.

http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi1321337625/

The Last House on the Left remake is actually happening.... I actually think this was a terrible idea, because the original is not something that should be mainstreamed.

-----

DHT: I have tried the link for the Last House on the Left remake and I keep getting a message saying the video is not available in my country. For whatever that's worth.

Maybe I just **thought** I posted this here: What would be your fantasy movie title, if cost, models, special effects, etc were no problem at all? Mine would be TRD 4: The Mother-Daughter Pageant (where TRD stands for Torture-Rape-Death). The 4 "winners" get a surprise they NEVER expected. Featuring whipping, flogging, TASERs, forced lesbian sex, forced mother-daughter sex, **LOTS** of rape, and 8 slow, painful deaths.

What's your idea?

========================

LGPATA sounded good until (and maybe I read this wrong) the girl dies from having her feet burnt? [a] I don't like burning (sorry, Ralphus), and [2] that doesn't sound particularly fatal. But at least it's better than "Gerald's Game", in which another author tried to undo all the fun that makes up LGPATA.

I have some information that I would like to share with everyone in here. I just received my order from Video Mayhem. One of the videos I ordered was this one, FA#132. When I first added this title to my shopping list a few months ago, I had a sense of Deja Vu. It was like I had already seen this one. However, the name didn't sound the least bit familiar.

Taking a closer look at its box image and reading its description more closely made it seem strikingly similar to another Japanese video I had purchased from Video Mayhem quite a while ago. It seemed like FA#132 was very similar to this title, Victims of War. Victims of War is another video by the same company as FA#132, that might explain the similarity between the two. I couldn't shake the feeling that the similarity was more than just being from the same company, that's why I ordered a copy of FA#132.

I wanted to watch it and compare it to Victims of War for myself. I had a hunch that FA#132 and Victims Of War were one and the same. Sure enough, when I popped FA#132 into my DVD Player to watch it, my hunch was confirmed. FA#132 is an exact duplicate of Victims of War, right down to the smallest nuance. The two are identical in every way, they have the same villains, same victims, same settings, even same plot. There is no doubt about it, the two are actually the same movie being listed under two separate names.

If you already have one movie or the other, don't bother spending your money the one you don't have, you'll end up with another copy of the same video.

Actually, I did take a look at the attackers.tv website. For some reason, the scenarios advertised didn't do much for me. Go figure.

-----

It's almost always controversial on this site whenever someone says they found something entertaining in a real-life story of non-consensual bondage and torture. But I have to tell you even some non-GIMPers I know found this story somewhat amusing. I wonder if he was singing, do you really want to be hurt by me?

Hey I would like to ask for some advice concerning the novels available at xNovel. Most of the books over there were originally written in the late 70's and mid to late 80's. I am not familiar with books from that era.

I have been wanting to download a few of the books for my collection, but there are way too many and I can't seem to decide. It would be easier if I knew a little more about the content of some of those books.

I am into bondage, torture, and even rape. What I am not into is the victims being mutilated in some fashion or dying. I would rather avoid that at all costs, I may be a GIMPer, but I am still human and stuff like that is too much for me to stomach.

With that in mind, anyone know of titles I should avoid while deciding what to download? Currently, I have downloaded only about a dozen randomly chosen titles from the Bondage Books, Bondage House, and Bondage Classics series under the Greenleaf Classics series.

The direct link to your reviews is in my Homepage URL above.

---------------

The Last House on the Left remake: Um, hasn't that already been remade a few times already? It seems like we've seen this one before. Truth be told, it really wasn't that great of a film in the first place, at least that I recall. I didn't take any footage from it. Some lame hands in front bondage, totally useless over the mouth gags and neither girl was bound for very long, either. It seemed to be more humiliation than anything else. About all I remember is the one girl had to pee her pants and the bad guys and the chick laughed at her. The unofficial remake Chaos was more nasty and bloody and was actually a pretty bad film overall. In this trailer that DHT posted, I don't see any female bondage at all, but at least the girls are nice-looking. I'm hoping for good things but not really expecting much.

---------------

Obiwan: Thanks for coming out of the lurking closet and finally joining us with your first post. It would be nice to see you here more often.

---------------

Ed: I would just look at the box covers at xNovel and go with whatever looks interesting. It's not like it costs anything to download them, anyway. Personally I liked a lot of the Bondage House and Bondage Books series as far as content; I have a lot of the actual books in my personal collection. They pretty much cover the Big Three: Bondage, Rape and Torture with little or no mutilation or snuff.

BTW, in the next few days, we'll begin running some of those great paperback covers as the daily picture, so keep coming back for those.

---------------

Jhlipton wrote:

What would be your fantasy movie title, if cost, models, special effects, etc were no problem at all?

Fantasy title? Mine would be "The Punishment of Aria: Ralphus Strikes Back". The ravishing Ms. Giovanni is recaptured after her escape and given a harsh reminder why she never should have left her large afroed midget captor in the first place. Cost won't really be a problem; I already have all the torture equipment ready and waiting for her return. It's just a matter of time til I catch up with her. Ooooh, is she in trouble.

If you like it a bit harder (as you stated: torture and rape), I would recommend you go to http://www.bdsmbooks.com/listoffers.htm and look up the stuff by the writer John Argus. Some of his novels are tame, too. but some of them have that certain "edge" which I prefer. His writing style is quite good. Fast-paced and very descriptive. And his harder novels are bursting with constant rape, gang-rapes and torture-scenes with a strong focus on bondage, whippings and electric tortures.

His best novels, IMHO, are "Thailand Torture Toy", "Japan Nightmare", "Russian Rape", "African Agony", "Captured Co-ed", "In Darkest Egypt", "Waves of Pain".

It's not free...but it's good stuff. If you want to give it a try, check out "Thailand Torture Toy" first. That's the best choice for testing if you like the stuff Argus writes.

-----

House on the Edge of the Park (1980)

La Casa Sperduta nel Parco, an Italian movie given the English title House on the Edge of the Park, stars David Hess, who played a similar character in 1972's Last House on the Left. What a coincidence.

House on the Edge of the Park is a very well-made and stylish movie, which I found both enjoyable and frustrating in turn. In a nutshell, it is about a delinquent and his simple-minded buddy who (sort of) crash a party and threaten, torture and rape the well-to-do guests. Lots of threatening, far too little torturing, and the rapes... well, I'll get to that.

We begin with Alex (the David Hess character) running a pretty young woman off the road, throwing her into the back seat of her own car, tearing open her blouse to reveal her small but perfect breasts, raping her still mostly fully clothed, and then strangling her as he climaxes. This all takes place in the first three minutes, so the movie starts off well. The only downside is that the filmmakers keep blacking out during the action. I just hate artsy shit getting in the way of GIMP action.

We're introduced to Alex and his buddy, Ricky, a simple-minded but likable guy who idolizes Alex and is happy that he and Alex are going to hang together tonight. Then we're introduced to two of the party guests, Tom and Lisa.

It turns out Alex and Ricky work at a garage, and Tom and Lisa pull in with car troubles and one thing leads to another and Alex and Ricky accompany Tom and Lisa back to the house (presumably on the edge of the park) where Glenda, Gloria, and Howard are waiting. Glenda is a bald black woman wearing all black. Gloria is dressed all in red (including red hose) and Lisa is dressed all in white (with white hose). They all dance in lame 80s fashion. The girls are all incredibly hot, and I found myself really hoping to see them all naked and in distress before the movie ends. My personal favorite is Gloria, the one dressed all in red.

Alex follows Lisa into the kitchen, hops her up onto the counter and licks the inside of her thigh and caresses her breast, which she lets him do to work himself up, then she pushes him away. So she's a tease. She announces that she's going to take a shower, and Alex follows her upstairs. She's all soaped up nude in the clear-glassed-in shower. We get full frontal and backside nudity. She makes a show of soaping herself up and invites him to scrub her back. She gets him into the shower, soaps him up, then walks out and insults him.

Meanwhile, Ricky is being fleeced in a poker game downstairs, where they are cheating at cards. Alex comes down and figures it out. A fight starts. Howard grabs a bottle to come after Alex, but Alex pulls a straight razor, which trumps a bottle. They start another game of cards and Ricky gets his money back. Alex decides they're going to "have some fun" now.

Alex pulls down Glenda's black dress to expose her breasts. Alex gives Ricky his choice of the women. Ricky decides to rape Gloria, the Red Queen. He gets one breast exposed briefly. Tom jumps Alex and tries to grab the razor. Alex gets it back and cuts Tom's cheek. Then he tosses Howard in the swimming pool and pees on him. Alex ties up Howard, because he's the only threat. (Tom is kind of a wuss.)

Alex grabs the Red Queen and holds her down across a large stool. Her dress gets pulled up. (She has great legs.) She makes whimpering noises and Ricky explores her body with his face until she pushes Ricky to the ground and starts hitting him. Alex threatens to cut her unless she "plays" with Ricky. We are well on the way to a great rape scene except Ricky can't get it up because Gloria the Red Queen is afraid and Ricky doesn't like to do it like that. Ricky is missing the GIMP gene.

Alex tells Ricky that he'll show him "how to do it." He picks up Lisa the White Queen by her hair and they have a little eye communication where he indicates to her she needs to suck his cock, so she gets down on her knees and starts to blow him and he pushes her away, getting even for her doing the same to him in the shower. Talk about stupid.

Glenda the Black Queen runs out of the room and turns the lights out. She hides in the dark. Alex waits and sure enough Glenda the Black Queen sneaks out to the door, where Alex catches her. He pulls her dress down once again and squeezes her breasts painfully until Tom distracts him and he beats the shit out of Tom. While that's going on, Gloria the Red Queen tries to call the cops on the phone and Lisa the White Queen flees upstairs. Alex follows.

Alex catches Lisa the White Queen and hits her a few times. He makes her strip for him. She strips down to her white hose and white silk garter belt. Alex carries her to the bed and sort of rapes her. He at least pulls her arms up over her head and pins them there while he gropes and kisses her. Since she doesn't really fight him all that much, it is a bit disappointing. We cut away before we see any hard fucking action. Then we return after it is all over. Alex and Lisa the White Queen walk back downstairs fully clothed like nothing happened.

Next, Alex tells Lisa the White Queen to make out with Glenda the Black Queen while they all watch. All they do is start kissing, when suddenly the doorbell rings. It's Cindy, a really cute young blond. Just as Cindy figures out she has walked into a Bad Situation, Gloria the Red Queen makes a run for it out the front door. Alex sends Ricky after her. Eventually, Ricky catches her. But he doesn't want to harm her and she is touched, so she makes out with him. Really, it gets hard to tell who is in control in this movie. But we do get to see Gloria the Red Queen naked (except for her red hose, which kind of makes her look hotter).

While the Red Queen is doing Ricky, Alex turns his attention to newcomer Cindy. While the others all watch, he uses his razor to cut off Cindy's white blouse, then slowly traces his razor over her bare upper body. He makes her strip down to her pink bikini panties and knee socks. He feels her up. All this time we get close ups of Cindy's wide blue eyes and tear stained cheeks. She does an exceptional job of looking scared. He slowly pulls her panties down and makes her step out of them. Alex's time with the innocent blue-eyed Cindy is intercut with Ricky and the Red Queen getting it on, so it loses some potency. Finally, Cindy flees to a couch and covers herself with a blanket and Alex laughs.

Now fully clothed again, the Red Queen is trying to convince Ricky that they don't have to go back inside. They can just call the police. But Ricky can't do that to his best friend Alex. About that time Alex opens the door on them and drags the Red Queen inside.

Ricky tries to talk Alex into leaving, but Alex wants to have his fun with Cindy. And I have to say, Cindy looks incredibly young and innocent, standing there naked except for white knee socks, with small breasts. Japanese schoolgirls have nothing on Cindy. Alex thinks she's a virgin. (I have my doubts, but she sure looks the part.)

Now Alex turns nasty. He pushes Cindy back onto the couch. Cindy tries to cover her breasts with her arms, so Alex slices her forearm with his razor. Cindy screams. Alex laughs. He slices her right breast. Twice. Then he slashes her left breast. Twice. Cindy screams and struggles vainly. Alex lifts up Cindy's arms and slices horizontally across her belly. Twice. He slices her left thigh, twice, of course. He cuts vertically down her stomach twice. It is a nice GIMP torture scene. Until Ricky interrupts him and Alex stabs Ricky.

At this point the GIMP stuff is over. Ricky writhes around on the floor bleeding. Alex is filled with remorse that he stabbed simple-minded Ricky. Alex loses control of the situation and Tom the wuss takes over. Needless to say, it goes badly for Alex. There is an interesting denouement.

So, there's the brief rape and murder with extremely brief nudity at the very start of the movie. (It will come as no surprise that the first victim has a connection to the party-goers.) The Black Queen gets her breasts exposed twice, and sucks face very briefly with the White Queen, but nothing else happens to her. The White Queen provides us with full frontal nudity in the shower and an R-rated sex scene in which she starts out being raped but ends up acquiescing. The Red Queen is almost raped a couple of times, even to the point where her breasts are exposed, but ends up seducing Ricky the would-be rapist instead. So that's a waste of a good GIMP possibility. But at least she is naked. Poor blond-haired blue-eyed Cindy doesn't get raped, but ends up slashed all to hell in a very nice razor torture sequence.

All in all, I was impressed with this movie. It had a complex and satisfying plot. It was well directed. It had good dialog. It was filmed well. The performers all looked good. The women were all absolutely hot. The sex was all R-rated. The GIMP factor was less than it could have been, which is why it was both entertaining and annoying. So, in my opinion, a much better movie than Last House on the Left, but bursting with unfulfilled GIMP possibilities. This movie gets a C, with a caveat. It was not bad for a mainstream movie, and it was really hot in places, but it certainly it could have been more violent.

This was the UNRATED version, which is temporarily Out of Stock at Amazon.com, but they promise to send it out just as soon as they get some more. There are R-Rated versions available used, but I'll bet they exclude some of the best GIMP stuff. Don't they always?

Raplus wrote:

Fantasy title? Mine would be "The Punishment of Aria: Ralphus Strikes Back". The ravishing Ms. Giovanni is recaptured after her escape and given a harsh reminder why she never should have left her large afroed midget captor in the first place. Cost won't really be a problem; I already have all the torture equipment ready and waiting for her return. It's just a matter of time til I catch up with her. Ooooh, is she in trouble.

You mean you haven't recaptured Aria yet? Oh I can imagine Ms. Giovanni now, taunting and laughing at you... Calling you a midget shrimp who can't even catch a cold, let alone a ravishing woman like her!

It sounds like there are a few worthwhile scenes in this 'House' movie. Still, it is unfortunate the movie flips back and forth among consensual scenes, non-consensual scenes, and sort-of non-consensual scenes where the victim doesn't put up any resistance.

I think House on the Edge of the Park is a movie I will buy if I see it but I don't think I'll go out of my way looking for it.

A few comments about recent posts. As to those book sites I agree with arrakur. Having been around to actually buy these books I also found the Greenleaf novels incredibly lame. Shortly before these appeared were the first iteration (many were later reprinted with solarized cover images) of the Bizarre Classics titles. These were the books illustrated by Demulatto and they were great. I too am not a fan of mutilation, but the eroticism of these books was so high that I could forgive the occasional mutilation. I remember one with a title like "Captured by the Indians" that was great. All were very good.

You can find Demulatto artwork all over the web, just like you can find Men's magazine covers. Finding the actual text of either - I never have. *Sigh* Now a site like that would be a real public service. Both these items Bizarre books and men's mags go for a high premium on eBay.

I actually watched "Last House on the Left" recently (I had seen it originally in a move theater when it was released!) and it confirmed my memory. It blew - big time. Bad cinematography, bad acting and a bizarre overused and incongruous soundtrack (it was so prevalent I imagine those who produced the soundtrack had to have been involved in the financing). Very bloody, very stupid and if there was any bondage in it -- it was too little or too lame to recall it. And I watched (yes, Ralphus, the whole movie) just a few months ago. How Wes Craven built a career off this piece of shit is a wonder to me. I say this in spite of the fact he went on to make some great movies (the first Nightmares flick among the classics).

~Dan

http://img196.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=06730_Emma_bed_distress_122_1168lo.jpg

Last House on the Left had "....a bizarre, overused and incongruous soundtrack (it was so prevalent I imagine those who produced the soundtrack had to have been involved in the financing)."

Oh, I don't know. In the scene where the criminals force the two young women captives to strip and get chummy, that hippy-dippy song playing in the background (...to guide you, protect you; hold you and love you...) is one that kind of grows on you. Granted, it's not an obvious choice of music for such a scene. But I can't imagine that scene now without that song.

It´s not free...but it's good stuff. If you want to give it a try, check out "Thailand Torture Toy" first. That´s the best choice for testing if you like the stuff Argus writes.

Oh I already know about about BDSM Books and John Argus, (although I know him only by the name he uses on the site 'Argus'). I've purchased many e-books from that site over the years, including several of Argus' books. He is one of my two favorite authors, the other being Jay Merson. Among my current e-book collection, I have a group that I have categorized as 'my favorites'. Argus and Jay Merson are two the only two authors to have several of their books earn a place in this group.

Got in first batch and shipped them. Emailed Bill Zebub and he had planned on picking them up from the factory this week. Have emailed him couple times- no response yet. Will email again right now and see if the second batch has shipped.

The best scene in the film you reviewed is where Hess slashes up the blonde virgin cutie. It's pretty nasty and quite arousing even though there's no bondage. I agree the rest of the film left a bit to be desired, but it's a pretty meanspirited movie and one I would recommend. No surprise about the misogynistic tone since it was directed by Ruggero Deodato, a director who has made a career out of making films with GIMP-like sensibilities. We need more filmmakers like him.

The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.

--------------

Just saw a very interesting film online tonight. Those of us who are shocked by the recent British law that essentially makes it a crime to view bondage imagery in one's home might want to take a look. This documentary explores the hysteria in the UK (mainly brought about by one woman, Mary Whitehouse) that led to the British censorship of the so-called "video nasties" in the 1980s, a practice that continues, at least in part, to this day. After watching the film you'll see that it's really no surprise that the trend has now escalated to bondage.

It's a powerful film that shows what can happen when the censor is allowed to have supreme power over what one can view, and surprisingly, a lot of the average British citizens that are interviewed in the film seem to be just fine with it. It's the result of the media coverage that plays up the belief that certain films could be warping the minds of the people who watch them, and of course, they justify that it's being done to "protect the children" (as if their parents are all dolts and need the government to raise their kids for them). It makes you wonder...is everyone in Britain really so dense that they actually believe the garbage propaganda that's being churned out for them?

It's a feature-length film but well worth your time. There's also footage from (talk about timing!) Last House on the Left and I Spit On Your Grave, as well as lots of other movies with GIMP appeal.

Ban the Sadist Videos Part 1
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 2
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 3
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 4
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 5
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 6
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 7
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 8
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 9
Ban the Sadist Videos Part 10

Hey, have any of you heard about the girl selling who is her virginity to pay for college...? I think she's asking for trouble. Seriously, I hope her buyer doesn't turn out to be a rapist.

It's the result of the media coverage that plays up the belief that certain films could be warping the minds of the people who watch them....

I haven't watched the documentary and I won't pretend to be an expert on the situation in the UK.

But my guess -- based on my own experience and some of the things Jeff Gord and others have posted -- is that there's a lot more to this than slanted or misleading media coverage.

I think many people believe there are some things that "cross the line" and they believe it's OK for government to shut those things down. As GIMPers, we don't agree, but we're aware of these attitudes in our society. It wasn't too long ago we had a poll survey asking GIMPers whether or not people in their real lives knew about their GIMP interests and the results were interesting. Throughout most of the results, I think there was a consensus that you don't want to have too many people knowing too much about the materials we like.

The US is more open to basic freedoms than most Western societies but even Americans don't seem too concerned when governments crack down on "extreme" pornographers. Did large numbers of people protest, or even care, when Larry Flynt was being prosecuted in the '70s and '80s? Have average Americans showed any concern about legal officials going after Robert Black or Max Hardcore?

The US would likely never tolerate the type of censorship that most non-Americans are familiar with (heck, Ontario's censors in the '80s wouldn't let us see penetration scenes in vanilla porn movies). But these are mostly differences in limits. There is opposition to GIMP material in every society and I think the reasons go well beyond biased media coverage.

----------

Ralphus: I saw quite a few of those "video nasties" in my youth. I guess that may explain my sudden urges nowadays to decapitate zombies and drill holes in homeless people's heads.

Seriously, having those pompous nitwit MPs in charge of what people can watch at home is more disturbing than any scene from "Evil Dead." I also found it stunning that Mary Whitehouse had so much clout on this issue even though she never even watched any of those movies.

... is everyone in Britain really so dense that they actually believe the garbage propaganda that's being churned out for them?

I don't think that's true. As the film explained, when the media and politicians make something out to be "evil," it's tough for anyone, especially a third party, to take a stand and risk being labeled "evil" themselves. I think many of the comments had more to do with protecting one's reputation than protecting children from becoming bloodthirsty maniacs. It is true that there wasn't a concerted effort to counter the attack from the censors. Yet the same thing, unfortunately, is happening in other countries, albeit to different degrees.

----------

jhlipton wrote: What would be your fantasy movie title, if cost, models, special effects, etc were no problem at all?

Mine would have to be a trilogy. Maybe "Lord of the Ring Gags."

By the way, just to show how unreliable a CORRELATION study is, there is a correlation between the amount of churches in a city and the crime rate - the more churches you have, the higher the crime rate. Of course, the explanation could be as simple as "more churches means there are more people, and the more people you have, the more that crimes get called in." But of course if you had an agenda against churches, you would post this finding all over the place even though it's not scientifically valid.

Some people thought that if men watch rape porn, for example, that they will be less likely to find rape-defendants guilty when serving on juries. This is one of those times when a person assumes something to be true because it seems to make sense, but if you put it through a real scientific study you will discover that it is not true even though the argument seems to make sense.

But you know, rap is something that I consider to be harmful, not just to society but also to music, ha ha. You will never see rap getting the kind of condemnation that porn suffers, probably because the originators and marketing schemes have injected the notion that rap is culture. I think that having kids intentionally ignore half of their vocabulary, abandoning basic English grammar, and being fooled into considering rap to be actual music is damaging. But of course, I wouldn't be an activist against it. Let others do as they wish, but I think that it is silly to condemn porn (which has yet to be proven to be harmful) and to let other areas of entertainment do whatever they want.

I also feel strongly that Brutus is right on target. I would love to paint entire populations as being stupid (and I'm still convinced that 51% of the voting population in 2004 was inexcusably stupid), but the answer is more complex. Religion is subversive in the extreme, and Christianity has had 2,000 years to hone its subversion skills. Its most subversive success has been convincing people that religion and morality are interchangeable, which they most certainly are not.

What the churches do is pick the most extreme activity and color those with a "live and let live" philosophy as fully supporting, if not actively practicing, that extreme behavior. Anyone supporting gay rights can be condemned for advocating sodomy. Anyone supporting free speech can be condemned for giving aid and comfort to radical groups. There is a difference between supporting freedom of speech and supporting the myriad causes advocated by groups speaking out. But that requires thoughtful consideration and that is anathema to religion, which requires ignorance and blind faith for full membership.

I was just listening to NPR this morning and heard a clip where Rick Warren said that pedophilia is the same thing as homosexuality. Whether he is that unbalanced or whether he is playing to his audience, it is an absurd notion that only ignorant people would believe. (Gosh, I wish he wasn't involved in the inauguration. Oh well.)

I know Christians who are not ignorant or judgmental, but I also know that they would be rejected by those who think of themselves as "true Christians." As long as they just quietly practice their faith, they fly under the radar. But the day may come where they will have to choose between doing what is morally and ethically right, and doing what their religion tells them to do. I guess that day is when their faith will come into conflict with what is morally and ethically right, and they will truly be put to the test. As these righteous crusades sadly demonstrate, far too many of those people fail the test. Although religion is worthy of martyrdom, I guess the cause of morality is not.

The article is about porn producers in Toronto, such as Maxine X. It's a pretty balanced article that suggests Toronto wants to become a bigger player in the porn production business. For the most part, the officials quoted in the article don't seem to care, although one police officer does raise the point about "crossing the line." Here is his quote:

"In the porn industry, if there are consenting adults and there's not the violence, children, animals, anything like that, you haven't crossed the line in making or distributing it," Det.-Sgt. Page said. "If there was any information involving pornography and children or violence, we would be on it tomorrow."

So there you go. This article isn't trying to get people whipped up about violent pornography (no pun intended) but still plays into the generally held belief that violent porn crosses the line.

It sure seems to me the biases are pretty entrenched.

Just wanted to publicly say thanks for having my site as link of the week, very cool! If I ever develop such a thing on any of my sites I will be sure to reciprocate!

JB

Anyway, the M33se commission, to which you refer, was as real as pro wrestling. A lot of fancy moves and the outcome was never in doubt. It was propaganda, pure and simple. The studies done at that time were neither scientific or independent.

Aussies, Canucks and UKers: On a completely different note, my heart goes out to you. You have some seriously misguided shit going on. We here in the states are dam lucky to have our First amendment. Let us fight ANYONE who tries to defile it.

Rob Black and Max: What they are doing to Max is just sick. Not a peep from anyone outside of the biz. No one cares. With such apathy, I'm not sure it will ever end, at least not in the foreseeable future.

Meanwhile, more and more people are filming themselves having sex and putting it on the internet. What a queer, hypocritical little world we live in.

Scion, The

---------------

John Galt: I think you hit the bullseye on the nose with your comment about religion being the culprit when it comes to accepting censorship. I don't know if you saw the movie I linked, but Mary Whitehouse's whole campaign derived from her belief that the "video nasties" went against Christian morals. In fact, check out the first line of her Wikipedia entry:

Mary Whitehouse CBE (13 June 1910 - 23 November 2001) was a British campaigner for what she percieved to be values of morality and decency derived from her Christian beliefs.

As far your contention that 51% of the voting population in 2004 was inexcusably stupid for re-electing Bush, don't forget that Bush won by largely coming across as the Christian candidate against Kerry. There's no question the religious majority was the force responsible for giving him the slight majority he needed to get in for a second term. I wonder how many of them regret that decision now. Bush couldn't even be elected dog catcher if he ran today.

BTW, I don't know if any of you actually watched the documentary I linked last night, but don't be scared off thinking it's going to be something long and boring or (shudder) educational. It's actually a real entertaining watch. You'll be hooked in the first minute. And there's nothing to download; it's streaming video just like watching YouTube. In fact, it was actually on YouTube at one time and they deleted it, sort of ironic since the whole film is about censorship.

Ralphus - now this is what I too call a good book, speaking of which, I just finished LGPATA and all I can say is wow. I found the best thing was, other than the prologue, there is no lead-in. Simply constant bondage start to finish. Yeah, we need this made into a major motion picture.

Had some of the older kids come by this weekend and they wanted to watch a horror movie. They brought a little item with them titled "Wax Mask" - think "1890s version of Jeff Gord meets House of Wax" - several nice moments with two drop dead gorgeous chicks, Romina Mondello and Valery Valmond. Probably ten minutes of good compilation material. Romina survives, Valery does not. Romina also survives a scene similar to a "Devonsville" thing where she's bound to a slab and the hogs come to start eating on her.

So after we finish that one they pull out another, "Scream Bloody Murder" also titled "The Captive Female" - circa early 70s - whack job kidnaps chick and keeps her bound and humiliated for the entire 2nd half of the film - incredible camp appeal with some of the worst dialogue ever. I am so proud of my kids as they seem to have my genetic make-up :)

Stay Well All

-----

Alex Powers asked: With all the talk about a " Let's Go Play At The Adams" movie, I got to thinking. Which young ( but over 18) actress should get the lead role?

I'll be going to Hell for this, but I would nominate Hayden Panettiere or Amanda Bynes for the role. They are probably also the most unlikely ever to consider such a role, of course, but oh my god could you imagine.

I have noticed that Ryo Takamiya also appears in Shark Special 63, although she's not on the box cover. I think this is noteworthy as Ryo is also quite attractive. Earlier this month, I had posted some Ryo clips from IESP-443 on YouTied, and I think people who saw the clips would agree that Ryo is a looker. Whether she does a New Slave Island movie or not, it will be worthwhile keeping track of any other Attackers movies starring Ryo.

---------------

Sloth: Geez, how ironic is it that you had your kids over to watch movies and the ones they brought over were both fairly obscure horror films that are both very heavy in bondage? Scream Bloody Murder...man, that's an old one, saw it years ago and it's fairly hard to locate these days. And The Wax Mask is great. Two gorgeous women in various scenes of naked bondage and terror; one of the great mainstream GIMP films in my mind. And yet...foreign and also hard to find in most video stores. I don't recall if there's bondage pictures on the DVD boxes but only a GIMPer would intentionally pick out a double feature like that. Your kids obviously learned a lot from their old man about what's really important in a movie. It's not plot and acting, it's bare breasts and rope. Looks like you raised them right.

Here's a few stills from the film, courtesy of our friend Hanks Hobbs:

http://www.imagebam.com/image/c3365624232816

http://www.imagebam.com/image/61131a24232813

http://www.imagebam.com/image/8337b124232814

---------------

Regarding "Let's Go Play At The Adams'", Boy, I envy you for getting to read that book for the first time. Anybody who's never read the book or doesn't know about it, do yourself a favor and seek it out. It took me several days to read it the first time (when I was in my 20s) because after I would read a few chapters, I'd be so excited I'd have to take a break and go fuck my girlfriend again. She didn't mind; she was the one who told me about the book in the first place. Years later, she's long gone but I still have the book and it still has the same impact whenever I read it.

It's amazingly well-written; the fear and the pain and the hopelessness that Barbara the babysitter feels after being constantly tied up and gagged for day after day, and the blasé reaction of the kids who tied her that way as they continue to ignore her pleads and just carry on because "it's the game". They're not really bad kids...well, they're actually pretty evil, but what they do makes sense to them in some sort of twisted way. That's what makes them so scary.

And I agree, you couldn't really make this a mainstream film and do it right because of the nudity and the fact that children are involved. And you couldn't make it an actual bondage film for the same reason. Can't have kids in it, and they are essential to the plot. It's because they are kids that the story works so well. Face it, it's an unfilmmable book unless someone goes underground and really breaks a bunch of rules and just makes the thing the way it should be, and sends the thing directly to DVD. I would buy it. Hell, I would finance it. I want to see this movie SO badly!

No national politician is going to "make a stand for rape and torture porn". And if you're voting on the national level thinking it will make a difference for our tastes, you're deluded. I am a little tired of the political shots around here. I'm a conservative, I really believe in less government, and more individual freedom. Something Obama clearly doesn't believe in. I still think he can be a relatively good President and I wish him nothing but the best. But remember it's not the politicians that get you, it's the bureaucrats, and the bigger the government is the more of them we have. Why don't you google Human Rights Commissions in Canada for some great examples of modern censorship horror stories?

So I have determined that in the horror world BREAKING HER WILL is a love-it-or-hate-it thing. No middle ground. How does it fare over here on this side of the world?

xploitedcinema dot com just picked up some copies. You probably know that the site is phasing out its inventory and isn't getting any new titles, but they made an exception in this case. And TLA ordered 300 units. Not a bad start.

I am also not sure to whom you are referring when you invoke the "Religious left," which sounds like a contradiction in terms to me. A Canadian, perhaps you can help me out and explain who comprises the "Religious left" in Canada. As to England, no matter how "left leaning" the government may be, there was little doubt in my mind, reading the Wikipedia entry on Mary Whitehouse to which Ralphus linked previously, that she was both a conservative and a member in good standing of the Religious Right, if they so identified themselves in England.

I briefly touched on this previously, but it is difficult to fight for reason and moderation, because a favorite tactic of religious activists is coloring opponents as immoral. For propaganda purposes, if I don't vocally oppose pornography, I will be portrayed not as an advocate free speech, but rather as an advocate (and by a none-to-subtle implication a practitioner) of pedophilia. Few people can lie as effectively as the Righteous, because their falsehoods carry the imprimatur of God, as they will remind you loudly and frequently. To oppose them is to oppose God, and hence to ally with Satan, and blah blah blah. I cannot readily recall a censorship movement that did not employ a religious justification as its raison d'etat. I am also at a loss to recall any "Religious left" religious persecutions.

I do sympathize with you, seeing as how you are not represented by either of the current political parties in America. The last eight years has seen an exponential growth in government (and a dangerously repressive one at that), all at the hands of a (self-professed) conservative Republican administration. And while I ignore bureaucrats at my own peril, I can lay blame for the human rights violations of Guantanamo Bay and other clandestine CIA torture camps established in foreign countries to sidestep the laws in America at the feet of a handful of (thankfully) recently unemployed conservative politicians. All in all, your venom would be more effectively deployed against the political party that betrayed your trust and ideals instead of the political party with whom you have always disagreed, as you might find allies among fellow disenfranchised conservatives.

Similarly, I don't think anyone believes the Obama administration will repeal any anti-obscenity laws (see paragraph three, above) and so your taunt in that regard is an odd non-sequitur. Some damage cannot be undone, and politically (and ideologically) sensitive damage cannot be openly undone. I think the most we can hope for is that those limbs of the body politic will be amputated and cauterized instead of allowing the current gangrenous infection to remain and spread more poison.

You might just need to suck it up and realize we tend to be a largely liberal bunch of pervs and that liberalism is going to come out every so often. At least we can all agree on the perversion.

-----

Wow. The Wax Mask sounds and looks incredible, based on those vidcaps. I'm going to have to look that one up. Thanks Sloth and Ralphus! This forum is so awesome.

Q: What's the difference between GIMPers and pro-Censorship folk?

A: When pro-censorship folk talk about GIMP material, most of them probably enjoy it and get turned on.

This is not just a matter of left and right. Although the religious right and the feminist left disagree on lots of things, the one thing they're all sure of is that we should be locked up just for watching these films. Not to mention the populist journalists, broadcasters, politicians, etc, who know where the sensational stories are.

Imagine a headline: "Respected teacher has stash of bondage films found among his possessions."

Not child porn. Not real snuff. Bondage. There would be a world of shit raining down on his head - he would certainly be sacked, be disgraced, and there would probably be comment made from everyone up to the fucking President/Prime Minister about how they are going to make screening of teachers much stricter to avoid such a happening in the future.

Let's just face the fact that we're despised by most people and that that will never change. Left and right, male and female, white and black. I give everyone a challenge to name one public figure (known for something other than adult entertainment) who has stood up for bondage movie lovers. I would love to be proven wrong, but something tells me I'll be waiting.

I noticed that someone made a comment about the music in Last House On The Left, and how intrusive it was. On the recent DVD version that I got, there is a documentary on the musician who composed the songs, etc, and its self importance is quite hilarious. Well worth tracking down for those who enjoy watching the creators of a slasher/horror/rape movie justifying their work as 'true art'.

It's sufficient for now to say the pro-censorship wingnuts exist in every political party.

I still maintain, though, that religion is the basis for anti-liberal activism. That religion is used as a weapon by (possibly single-issue) liberals fighting to become accepted conservatives just confuses the issue.

What you are really saying, seems to me, is that our views are not mainstream, and because they are not mainstream they are despised. With yesterday's inaguration I couldn't help but stop to think how mainstream the idea of a black president was--say--50 years ago?

Mainstreaming something into acceptance requires work, exposing it to the light over time, getting people used to it. Don't believe me? See the Gay Rights movement.

Ralphus - great vidcaps from "Wax Mask" - should have known our old friend Hank Hobbs would have those in his archives.

John Galt - while it is true neither Hayden or Amanda would willingly accept such a role perhaps we could convince Joel Reed to crank up his "Bloodsucking Freaks" production company again and have one abducted and forced to do the part :) - realism and entertainment in one fell swoop.

As I seem to have walked into a discussion on the left-right censorship issue allow me to chime in without addressing anyone's' points in particular - I would submit there certainly is a "religious left" just as vile and evil as the right - while the religious right worships at the altar of the supreme being, the religious left worships at the altar of the supreme government - that is their deity and is equally dangerous on any issue of censorship - as for me, I have faith in neither and contempt for both - two dogs of the same breed ready to bite at any time if you don't behave according to their standards and all you can do is choose the breed.

And on that cheery note I say Stay Well All

Most of those sensitive souls who were easily turned over to support civil rights or gay rights (and let's not forget that even in the US, both of those battles are far from universally won) would look at us, were we to start asserting our rights, and laugh (or, perhaps more likely, scowl).

John Galt, I don't think it's as complicated as left-feminists moving to the right when they try to censor bondage. To the vast majority of people from anywhere in the political spectrum, spousal abuse is a horrible thing (as it is, I would hope, to all folk here). Whereas most progressive thinking people, even if they find it 'icky', can say to themselves something like "oh well, so long as I don't have to watch it, gay people expressing love to each other is pretty much like me expressing love to my wife", or "that black man is pretty much exactly the same as me, except that his skin is a slightly different tone", the thing that bondage is closest to is a bad thing - abuse. So they might accept the most polite of 'love bondage' (and say to themselves "well, sometimes I enjoy having my hands held together when I'm fucking, so this isn't that much more extreme"), but certainly not the movies we talk about.

Anyway, like our Canadian buddy, I have to get to work, but let's keep the fun discussions coming.

As far as who to fear, I agree with you on the Religious right, but you can certainly add Feminist, and overly PC prosecutors, and don't forget Muslims. Islamist are having a growing influence on the laws in Europe, especially England. And while they don't seem to have many problems with beating women (the extremist that is-the battered women's shelters of Europe are now majority Muslim women). they hate pornography with a passion and have no tolerance for freedom of speech.

Now back to the what's really important, the Last house on the left remake stars Sara Paxton who is a fine nubile hottie. While I would prefer Rachel Bilson or Kirsten Bell one can only hope.

VM, Is their any chance of you posting the names of the Japanese actresses on your site? This would really influence my ordering probably in a positive way. I would love to see a data base of Japanese women in Gimp movies, this would be a great asset.

It's funny how these things work. The censorship fans on the religious right are very uptight about anything involving sex. In my mind, this explains why they seem to be far more concerned with porn (even vanilla porn) than many other things in our society that should be more troubling to them.

Meanwhile, across the street, the do-gooder lefties are worried about things that might hurt people's feelings -- particularly the feelings of people they see as disadvantaged. They believe if something is "offensive," than it is "harmful," and they want it censored. This would naturally include violent pornography, which they believe is "harmful" because it is degrading to women in general and takes advantage of a specific group of women who are too stupid to realize they shouldn't appear in such movies.

So you end up with a situation like this: the religious right hates Ralphus because his website offends Jesus and the do-gooder left hates Ralphus because he exploits women.

Good luck trying to bring any politicians onside. The GIMP situation is trickier than the marginalization of the gay commnunity because many GIMPers belong to that most evil and unworthy group -- the heterosexual white males.

-----

elkcreek: I don't think I've ever seen Sara Paxton in anything, so I am generally ambivalent about her being in the Last House on the Left remake. But ooh, Kristen Bell would have been cool.

But you know who I would like to see get seriously abused in a rape and torture movie? Paris Hilton. She just always looks so smug, and there's just something about her. Come to think of it, she would be on my nomination list for a LGPATA movie as well. A little old, but what the heck.

I don't like the political discussions to weigh down the board, so I'll make one extra point. It's interesting that A Canadian and I share a point of view on this, and that we both come from countries that are far more secular than the USA, at every level of society, yet have far more censorship.

John Galt: I'm just an evil and unworthy heterosexual white male, eternally grateful for the hot women who are BDSM performers.

I'm not going to buy into the politics of the first half of this statement, but to the second half, I'm going to give another big CHEEEEEEEEER. Especially as a number of those wonderful women read and post here :-)

So you end up with a situation like this: the religious right hates Ralphus because his website offends Jesus and the do-gooder left hates Ralphus because he exploits women.

My, so much hated! Well, at least my fellow GIMPers don't hate me. A 3 foot 7 midget with an afro who tortures women? Geez, what's not to love about that?

If you get down to it, there's probably a lot of people that dig bondage itself. They've been making "damsel in distress" movies and books since before our grandfathers were born. But the extreme stuff that we like will always be underground and only have a limited appeal. My guess is that most people who have a taste for bondage would likely be turned off by rape and torture scenes, though. Not all of them, but probably most of them. I know, it seems hard to believe. Makes you wonder what's wrong with the rest of the population that doesn't "get it". At least we don't have that problem. We'll never be mainstream, but in a way, that's sort of cool.

Elkcreek: Wow, Sara Paxton looks super-fuckable as a blonde in that pic you linked. I looked at the trailer again and she's not a blonde in the Last House remake, though. Still looks awfully good. From reading the IMDB comments, apparently she does indeed get raped in the film, so that might make it worthwhile. It also says the scene where she's forced to pee her pants isn't in this new version. And word is that the film will have LESS rape and torture and will instead concentrate more on the parents' revenge. Typical. I can't say that I'm surprised.

1. A lot of the material we like **appears** non-consensual. In fact, many reviews include something like "this scene looked consensual, so I gave it a lower grade". To that end, non-consensual scenes can be over the line for many.

2. Many women are forced (by circumstances, as well as threat of actual violence) to appear in consensual scenes. Isn't it more likely that a non-consensual scene may feature an actress who isn't fully consenting?

I have a hard time balancing my liberal beliefs with my love of certain fetishes. Violence against women is a big problem, and while most of us here may be disgusted by it, I suspect that there are a lot of those who love GIMP material who aren't -- that women really do "get what they deserve".

Finally, when feminists say that porn (and especially violent porn) exploits women, it's because there are hundreds, more likely thousands of women who **are** exploited by porn.

Just some points to consider.

So here's a couple of heads up on a couple of flicks viewed yesterday by your humble Gimper.

I obtained a copy of a Centaur Celluloid production "The Restaurant Heist" from Video Mayhem. Check above link for a cover shot. Our good friend Natasha Flade is in it for a short time and looks phenomenal as always. Nothing really Gimp-worthy and purely vanilla. I would comment this is a nice effort for foot guys - predominately featured throughout with plenty of wiggling and squirming. Now, is it just me or have others here who've viewed Natasha films noticed that, besides her considerable obvious charms, Isaac W. certainly seems to have a thing for her tootsies? Not that I mind as Natasha is a natural for a hogtie.

This next one is a warning to avoid at all costs. Many on this forum hold the ZFX effort "Squealer" in high regard and rightfully so. So I find a movie for auction on eBay with a similar title and the cover shot features a bound chick laying on the ground looking at the camera. What a piece of crap! It was produced by Hustler Magazine as a suck and fuck flick, apparently did not sell so they featured the single bondage scene in the film on the cover in an attempt to draw in that crowd. View this only at your peril.

Stay Well All

Left or right. Big government or small government. Religious or non-religious. Liberal or conservative. Steelers or Cardinals. Someone in all of these groups will find a reason to attack the movies we love if it suits their purpose. Extreme bondage movies will never be mainstream because of their association with violence against women.

---------

Speaking of mainstream, here another review with an abbreviated entry for the rape scene database at the end:

The Hitchhiker (2007)

Hidden beneath this 2007 thriller lies one of the more important questions of our generation: What the fuck is wrong with misogynistic killers in mainstream movies these days?

Some words of advice for the villain in "The Hitchhiker." You are a cinematic serial killer/rapist and you've bought an assortment of ballgags, duct tape and rope. Very good. But why stop there? Get yourself some whips. Buy some electric-torture devices. Go to a hardware store and arm yourself with some good old-fashioned pliers. Have some fun with your victims, goddammit! Oh, and find yourself a brain while you're at it.

But no. You've decided that shooting your victims will suffice.

This is a perfect example of "wasted potential." The killer is not very imaginative. In fact, he's rather boring. And to top it off, he's also an idiot whose sloppy work is a constant irritation.

The first death scene isn't even shown in this movie. Jack (Jeff Denton), a psychotic killer who hates women, pulls over to the side of an empty highway at night and opens his truck to reveal a damsel in jeans and blouse with a red ballgag stuffed in her mouth and her hands taped together in front. Her convincing screams are muffled, but Jack removes the gag. She hollers for help into the empty night as Jack silently digs her grave. Actually, this was a rather chilling scene, which fades out before she is killed.

We fade in at dawn with four hot women in a car who surprisingly haven't driven each other nuts with their inane conversation. We have our heroine, the typical level-headed brunette (Sarah Lieving), the slutty blonde, the broken-hearted blonde and the rather boring one who you just know will be the first to die. After seeing Jack hitchhiking on the road, they decide to pick him up because "he's hot'' and it's Christmas.

After developing car trouble they go to a motel, get drunk and sink to the depths of retarded dialogue.

"I bet he has a big cock."

"How can you tell?"

"Just the way he carries himself. He's very confident."

"Hmmm. I agree."

This attempt at character development succeeds in making the viewer have no sympathy at all for any of the women in this movie. (Maybe that was the director's intent? To show that women like this get what they deserve?)

Anyhow, the boring one gets horny after a few beers. She sneaks into Jack's room and strips to her underwear. He takes her from behind in a standing position and puts a semi-chokehold on her and pulls her hair. Then he has her missionary on the bed, her tits exposed, and thrusts away while choking her with one hand. She's clearly uncomfortable, but not exactly hating it, in this brief scene.

The next day, Jack concocts some spiked drinks for the ladies. Level-headed brunette wakes up and finds the motel manager dead. Jack takes her to a room covered in plastic sheets where her three friends are sitting on the floor, hands duct taped in front and sort of over the fingers. Two are wearing red ballgags. And the other one, well, I had to look at this closely, is ring gagged. But the ring is in sideways and is not forcing her mouth open. In fact, it looks like a mini frisbee wedged between her lips. How stupid is that? If I wanted to see people with frisbees in their mouths, I'd check out a documentary on that rainforest tribe that Sting used to hang around with.

(There's only one shot of the ring gag. Perhaps some GIMPer on the production team later pointed out that flaw and they removed all the scenes.)

Jack knocks out the level-headed one. She comes to with her wrists taped together. Jack removes all the gags and explains how he was betrayed by his true love and now hates all women, blah blah blah.

The broken-hearted blonde says she can relate to him, so he gets her topless at knife-point and throws her on the bed. Then he orders the level-headed brunette on the bed and rapes her for a few seconds. Now it's blondie's turn, from behind, as she sobs. Both women do not really fight back so the violence and passion are lacking. But the biggest problem is that the entire rape scene lasts for only about a minute because Jack-ass had cut away the tape on the brunette's wrists. While he's raping the blonde, the brunette grabs a sheet of plastic and wraps it around his head and he loses consciousness.

The four women escape, find their car won't start, and go back to finish off the killer. He shoots and kills the boring one and recaptures the remaining ones. Again, they are taped hands in front.

A young couple shows up at the motel. Jack kills the guy and uses rope to tie the woman's hands after pistol-whipping her.

Now our killer is really starting to piss me off. He's got a second chance to be really nasty to these women. But alas, he tortures them by blathering on about how women can't be trusted. Then he blows away the slutty one. He's got a thing for the level-headed brunette, so he tapes her legs together on the bed, cuddles her fully clothed body in the spoon position and sleeps.

The girlfriend of the dead guy uses her cellphone to call 911. We can also see that the ropes around her wrists are about as loose as the boring one when she's drunk.

The cops come, a shootout occurs, followed by a car chase and a rather predictable ending that took forever to unfold.

To sum up, the movie itself is a standard thriller with no real surprises. The women are all fairly attractive (although annoying as hell), and there isn't too much gore. The acting is average.

But as is often the case, the movie itself and the GIMP scenes come down to the villain. In "Hitchhiker," our killer does have some good qualities for our purposes. He rapes the two in front of the other two, and gets one of them topless. He can be menacing, as shown when he shoved the barrel of the gun in the brunette's mouth. He's also not hesitant to smack around his victims. And he did use ballgags.

But he has so many more faults. He's not particularly scary. He talks way too much. And the sloppiness. Oh the sloppiness! His rope tie was a joke. He bound their hands in front. He removed their gags or bindings WAY too early or for no apparent reason. He didn't bother checking for that cellphone. And he slept when he should have been torturing these women. How could such a careless criminal be on the loose for so long?

If the writers had bothered to give Jack some imagination or creativity (and a brain), the movie--and the GIMP scenes--would have been so much better.

As it stands, Jack the killer knows jack shit about what to do with helpless females.

I give the movie a C- and the GIMP scenes a C.

AMAZON

Some stills are available here.

Warning: There are many other movies of the same title.

----------

For the rape scene database:

A lunatic has four attractive women tied up hands in front in a motel room. He gets a blonde topless at knife-point and throws her on the bed. Then he orders a brunette on the bed and rapes her for a few seconds. He switches to the blonde and takes her from behind as she sobs. The other two also sob as they are forced to watch. It's not very violent or passionate. The brunette attacks him as he is raping her friend and the four women escape. The rape scene lasts for only about a minute.

First of all, any GIMP is just fantasy. Really hurting someone is just sick, there is a real person involved with family, etc. How someone could do that is beyond me.

I prefer movie scenes over "porn" like hogtied, etc. For me, there has got to be a story behind it, which is why I love Brian's Page. Brian has a great database of scene descriptions. I use it all the time to find new stuff, or get more information on a scene of may have viewed.

I like peril situations the best, there can be torture, or even blood, but I prefer the damsel to get rescued. One of the reason I didn't care for "Chaos" or "Hostel II" all that much.

Just my 2 cents.

There was a scene in The Omen years ago where a sheet of plate glass slid off of the back of a truck and decapitated a guy. If I like the scene, does that mean I want to see people decapitated by sheets of plate glass? I think not. The more realistic it looks, the greater the entertainment value. If you cannot do it or see it done for real, it is thrilling to see it done so realistically that you can imagine it happened. (That's that dynamic I was talking about.)

I think you are drawing an arbitrary line by suggesting that realism is not acceptable maybe only in sexually violent movies. Violence of any kind should be unacceptable, if you want to pursue that line of reasoning. In entertainment, it is a release, and much better released in the form of entertainment than in Real Life, to my way of thinking.

As to your second point, I know that coercive techniques have probably been employed and will probably continue to be employed in adult entertainment, and not just (or even primarily) in BDSM or adult "nonconsensual" scenes.

However, coercion is used every single day in every facet of our society, and we all benefit from such activities and carefully turn a blind eye. In America, I suspect most people are coerced by money, and do things they might not prefer to do for money. That includes the young girl asking you if you want fries with that burger. She is not working in fast food because she wants to (there are exceptions I am sure). She needs the money. Some things pay better than other things. Some things are more humiliating than other things.

Garment sweatshops used to be coercive, humiliating, and dangerous places to work. The solution was not to stop making garments, or to stop wearing clothes. There was pressure to reform instead. (Of course, when it became unprofitable for garment makers to make clothes in America, they outsourced to sweatshops in other countries where the same coercive, humiliating and dangerous practices are still acceptable. But I digress.)

The porn industry is probably worse than fast food and the garment industry because it is a fringe industry and less-than-upstanding people have found a niche there. But the porn industry will not be going away, so the sooner we accept it and apply the same rules to adult industry performers (who are now regarded by "polite society" and the authorities as pretty much deserving anything bad that happens to them), the better working conditions will be. There is nothing inherently wrong with enjoying sex, or enjoying performing sex, or enjoying watching people perform sex.

We have to live within the bounds of our society. But our society will stagnate if we do not occasionally step out of those bounds and look at the larger reality, and adjust society to match reality. Interracial relations used to be unacceptable. Same-sex relationships are becoming more acceptable. Sexual activities that used to be unacceptable are now discussed in how-to books available at your local bookstore. BDSM will eventually be an acceptable practice. However, not everyone will marry interracially. Not everyone will involve themselves in a same-sex relationship. Not everyone will perform every sexual technique there is, or even be willing to try. And not everyone will become a dom or sub. Not everyone will accept even one of those practices, although society in general will include them.

We are in the forefront of a new society! Take up your ropes and spreader bars and follow me, singing loudly:

Onward GIMP-er soldiers
Marching as to war
With the cross of Bill Zebub
Going on before.
Ralphus binding Aria
Leads us from below
Even though he is so short
See his forum go!

Come on, everyone! you know the tune....

-----

John Galt wrote:

...With the cross of Bill Zebub, Going on before.

Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant.

I have the feeling that watching the film won't be as entertaining as reading your humorous interpretation on it, but like Canadian, I still want to see this one. In fact, it's been number one in my Netflix queue for months now but it still hasn't arrived. For expected availability, it's listed as "Very Long Wait". Apparently Netflix must only own one friggin' copy and whoever has it now is dragging his feet returning it. I'm also not expecting much but I'm intrigued since it was made by the same independent studio that made When a Killer Calls, a pretty good film for bondage (in fact, Sarah Hall from The Hitchhiker gets tied up and tortured in that one).

I added your synopsis to the Rape in Mainstream Movies database and your review to the Reviews section in my Homepage URL above.

And here's a pic of the choking sex scene you mentioned earlier, again courtesy of our friend Hank Hobbs: http://www.imagebam.com/image/c780f724416984

John Galt: I hope you know that I've had that blasted song going through my head ever since I read your post. It's like being back in church, although we never sang the chorus about me tying up Aria. I do think it's an improvement.

Of course -- any line is going to be somewhat arbitrary. However, to me, there is a difference between appreciating realism for its own sake, even in a violent scene (Reservoir Dogs is an awesome movie, but peaceful it ain't) and looking for realism in "fap movies". By and large, we're not admiring the stunning cinematography as the girl is getting whipped (if anything, we'd be complaining about it). We're appreciating the violence for its own sake.

In entertainment, it is a release, and much better released in the form of entertainment than in Real Life, to my way of thinking.

True as far as it goes, but I would feel more comfortable if my fantasies were just vanilla (and not "vanilla" in the sense of "The Restaurant Heist" -- topless hogties may be ho-hum to this crowd, but they are **not** vanilla). ---------------------

the sooner we accept it and apply the same rules to adult industry performers (who are now regarded by "polite society" and the authorities as pretty much deserving anything bad that happens to them), the better working conditions will be.

Amen, brother, preach it! However, you don't address the fact that many performers are not "coerced" by the need for bucks, but by violence or threat of violence. Probably not **as much** in American movies, but that's another thing we off-shore to salve our consciences...

BDSM will eventually be an acceptable practice.

Isn't that far more likely from the despised "love bondage" than a ZFX or Attackers flick? Were you to say, "rape fantasies will eventually be an acceptable practice", it might be apt, but true only if we share them with our Significant Others. If you (and all the other GIMPers) can ask your girlfriend, "Hey, hon, Slave Island or Video Pirates tonight?", then you're moving to make these movies socially acceptable.

Side note: I find it ironic that in the middle of this conversation, Brutus uses "they get what they deserve" without irony.

Brutus - just when I was about to ask where you've been you emerge with a great review.

I immediately checked the Gimp Rules Manual and the crew who did Hitchhiker clearly violated Section 4, paragraph 2b which states "An imperiled female will always be bound with wrists behind. The only exception is when the wrists are bound in front in conjunction with a crotch rope which runs up the back, culminating in a noose around the neck so she chokes with every hand movement, i.e. Naomi Watts in 'Funny Games'."

I viewed that flick sometime last year and fully agree with your assessment. One missed opportunity after another. That first scene did manage to convey a real sense of peril they were never to replicate again for some reason. And yes, this is about the most unlikeable band of victims I've ever seen. Again, thanks for a fine review.

John Galt - like Ralphus I tossed and turned all night trying to purge that ditty from my melon - so do we now have an official Gimp Nation national anthem - I say yes.

Ralphus - when I watched "When a Killer Calls" I thought the strongest scene was the very first where the housewife victim ends up hogtied on the bed. Killer removes her gag and, well you know the rest. A very well done scene in my humble opinion.

Stay Well All

And don't they all violate Section 2, paragraph 5a, which states "As soon as possible, get her topless, or at the very least, into a skimpy nightie, which must be drenched (with water or sweat) to near transparency. Most kidnappers forget the simplest rules!

There have been Attackers movies where a woman is bound and a vibrator is tied inside her pussy. One of the more memorable scenes of this nature was in Shark Special 33 with An Nanba.

Going beyond the Attackers movies, I have seen films where a bound woman is violated with a dildo attached to a power drill. Some of the I-Energy detective movies, such as IESP-351, have scenes like that.

There are also "fucking machine" movies such as this one and this one, although I have never seen them. Or perhaps this one.

Someone looking for some star power in one of a vibrator-themed movie may want to try DASD-010 with Maria Ozawa or Arrogant Teacher Machine Vibe with Erika Sato.

I hope this is helpful.

---------

Sloth: Yeah, I've been a bit busy lately but finally got some free time. I forgot to mention earlier that I think "Wax Mask" is one of the more overlooked quality mainstream GIMP films. Sorry to hear about that "Squealer" debacle.

--------

jhlipton wrote: I find it ironic that in the middle of this conversation, Brutus uses "they get what they deserve" without irony.

Ironically, I threw in that bit at the last minute after reading your previous post and thinking about why the female characters in the movie were developed in a way that offered little sympathy for them. I thought that the director may have been trying to send a message that slutty and reckless women are just asking for it. I myself do not subscribe to that theory.

I would feel more comfortable if my fantasies were just vanilla ...

I would guess that most of us feel that that way. But, speaking for myself, it ain't gonna happen. In my younger days, I would sometimes avoid TV shows like "Charlie's Angels" with potential GIMP material. I would also try to focus on women's feet, hair or anything else that didn't involve bondage. I even dumped a large part of my bondage stash. This was all done in the hope of ridding myself of this fetish. The fact that I'm now writing reviews on this forum telling movie villains how to properly torture women shows that all those efforts failed miserably.

I have long given up trying to change who I am. I don't even consider vanilla sex as fantasy material. I think vanilla sex is simply what most heterosexual males think about 99% of the time. Sure, there could be massive improvements to the industries that cater to my fetish. But for my part, I can safely say my personal fantasies have never led to any unwanted physical harm to any woman, and I am certain it will remain that way. This is what now makes me feel comfortable with my fantasies.

Yet, I've often thought about how my life would have turned out if I was "normal." This brings up a possible GIMP poll question, one that may be very tough to answer but could bring about some interesting comments because it delves into the very essence of who we are. Would you prefer to have been born without the BDSM fetish?

I tend to be obsessive-compulsive. As for vices, I rarely drink, nor do I smoke or use drugs (although I have developed a dependence on Diet Coke and chocolate that I frequently indulge). I am a voracious reader, and I enjoy porn quite a bit. Now, of course, I like my porn more extreme. Ironically, my first exposure to BDSM was through literature (both comics and novels almost simultaneously, thanks to Sweet Gwendolyn and A Man With a Maid). However, I am not nor have I ever been a violent person. No one will be clamoring to award me the Nobel Peace Prize, but all in all I think I am pretty well balanced. Most importantly, though, I am almost always analyzing my life, my beliefs and my choices. I can say that I don't have even a hint of the doubt (actually, "self-loathing" was the phrase that first occurred to me, but that is far too harsh a term) that jhlipton occasionally hints at feeling.

In short, I value my fantasies. There are things I have to experience vicariously because I could not experience doing them in reality and still be who I am. People who have no fantasies tend to be dull. People who act out their fantasies tend to be sociopaths. I feel pretty good about where I am.

I feel the need to subvert some song lyrics at this point, but nothing occurs to me. Probably because it is so late and I just downloaded and burned to DVD an awesome Whipped Ass scene with Riley Shy and Sasha Grey that I am anxious to watch. So some songwriter somewhere should be breathing a sigh of relief right this minute.

The ones that should apologize are the people that visit this site, read the reviews and don't say a damn thing...not even a thank you. I've written a few reviews over the years and I know they take time. Lots of time. We're talking hours of work for no pay whatsoever, except for the hope that someone else out there might actually take 2 minutes and say they liked what you did, or that they even read it. It's called FEEDBACK, guys. People that take time to share with others deserve a little of it. It's what keeps us going.

I refuse to believe that 800 people a day stop by just to grab the picture and aren't even reading the discussions. This is your forum; why not become a part of it? Instead of hearing from the same 5 or 6 posters, how about some of you lurkers speaking up? And don't give the excuse that you have nothing to say.

Okay, this is a perfect opportunity to break your silence. I like Brutus' poll question so let's make it official.

GIMP POLL:
Would you prefer to have been born without the BDSM fetish?

Lurkers, I'm counting on you to come through. You don't have to write a book. But shoot, just give your opinion. I think what you have to say is important, don't you? Let's get this place talking.

As for feedback, I know that the 1:100 or 1:1000 ratio of posters:readers on any forum is a problem, but here's some advice to any lurkers with a real interest in GIMP films - don't necessarily drop in when someone writes a review, if you really feel that you have nothing to add, but, if you go out and check out a movie based on a review, come by and just write your own version of the following words: "Thanks Mothbrad for the great tip on checking out the extended version of 'The Love Guru' with the extra hour of Jessica Alba bondage scenes. It was great."

In other words, people don't post reviews here for the glory, they do it so that other people will also see the hidden gems and enjoy them. The type of feedback above is the best type, IMO.

And in case you were wondering, the Love Guru thing I referred to above only existed in my dreams ... dreams dreamed while snoozing through the real thing. Watcher beware ...

But I'm OK with looking at the stuff. (Spoken like a true lurker).

As Popeye the Sailor would say, I yam what I yam.

-----

mothbrad wrote:

"Thanks Mothbrad for the great tip on checking out the extended version of 'The Love Guru' with the extra hour of Jessica Alba bondage scenes. It was great."

Trust me, if anyone finds a Jessica Alba movie with that type of bonus footage, he will definitely get a 'thanks' from me.

With the blessings of Ralphus I would like to say that my blog issues are over and we are posting away. Please go to backdoorbondageblog.com; you will have to rejoin to post but it's free, so please enjoy.

As to the poll, there were times in my life when I had wished that I was not born with the desire for fetish burning away in my spirit. After much struggle and soul searching I can say I would rather not be sexual than to be vanilla. I think each person who is drawn to this lifestyle seeks something different. The trick is to find a place of acceptance in your journey. I guess you have to be free of guilt and fear to really love this lifestyle. Am I there, no not all the way, because my mask stays on for the time being. That is more based out of a need to remain out of the public's eye. There is not a day that goes by in which I am not grateful for what I have had the chance to do in this lifestyle and business.

Male dominance and trait selection are embedded in it. The attractive females run and hide so that only the dominant male can get access.....in times of war....the conquering army takes the attractive babes....in times of peace....we fantasize about it. If we can't fantasize about it....we'll be out doing it.

Just my own little fucked up theory but there it is.....

Ralphus thanks for providing this forum....it takes a lot of work and is much appreciated!

When my cool Brother-in-law introduced me to Sake, a Japanese rice wine that should warmed to body temperature before drinking, somehow my new love was to tie a woman tightly, then giving her a sake bath. I know that sounds weird, but until you try it, please don't knock it. Her body absorbs the alcohol like a sponge, and her body gets smashed as you do licking it off her body. A woman can easily have three or four orgasms every time. She can't help it. Between the ropes and her body getting high, it's her own body heat and the high that controls the orgasms. Pretty wicked if you love to bring a woman to her ultimate high getting "saked" and cumming at the same time.

Ain't that so very cool?

An unusual moment for a weekend post.

Brutus - whatever the reason, good to have you back partner.

To simply echo the sentiments of our host gnome, lurkers come out and send a post - they are always appreciated, especially on a poll question or a movie review - all about info.

And concerning that poll question - no regrets at all and they were with me from the start - I find it hard to fathom anyone who has no fetish or perversion and don't think such a person exists - just differences of arena and degree - accept, enjoy and make no apologies as long as no one suffers physical damage.

Gotta go pick up the ladies from the movies - no, they are not watching a ZFX production :)

Stay Well All

Tendencies can come from parents, grandparents etc. Someone I know who produced a couple bondage movies mentioned his overbearing mother kind of led him in the direction of bondage etc.

People are not born with a BDSM fetish gene. Attitudes toward bondage are developed through one's life experiences. Parents, girlfriends, wives and other family members can have an influence on our need or acceptance of bondage/sm. An alcoholic is not born an alcoholic.

Whoa! Now that's an interesting response. I wonder how many other people feel that way?

No, an alcoholic isn't necessarily born that way, but I think we're talking about apples and oranges. I seriously believe that a person's sexual desires are determined at birth. Apparently you don't. By that logic, homosexuals aren't born that way and it's a learned behavior, like say if he was raised by a domineering mother and an effeminate father. Does that mean if I went through rigorous training that my desire to see women tied up could be "cured"?

Sorry, not buying it. I've always been intrigued by bondage and peril situations and I can assure you I didn't learn it from my parents or my friends. And like Brutus, I went through denial when I was growing up and threw away stimulus material to try to shake myself of what I considered an evil way of thinking. I kept wondering what was wrong with me. Being different isn't easy. You don't have anybody in your life who feels the same way you do, so you have to keep it to yourself. In fact, I don't think I had any friends who were into the same stuff until I came online 12 years ago and discovered I wasn't quite so weird after all.

There were newsgroups like alt.torture and alt.sadistic that I used to hang out at, and when my friend The Gimp and I came up with the idea of this forum back in 1999, I never imagined so many others would eventually flock to this site and I would end up interacting with so many people who felt the exact way I did. I'm "different", yeah, but I'm not ashamed of my desires and now I realize I was just wired that way. Some sort of sexual desire is normal, but we're not all programmed the same way. We just have to find a way to curb our longings so that no one gets hurt.

In a way, I feel badly for child molesters. Can you imagine having to fight off the way you feel, day after day, week after week, every day of your life because society says it's wrong? Now don't get me wrong; I'm definitely NOT condoning their behavior when they slip up, because they still have to be responsible and never act on those feelings EVER, but wouldn't life be a lot easier for them if they didn't have those desires in the first place?

Likewise, someone with the inborn wiring to want to attack or rape a woman must never act on it, and that's why fantasy material is so important. God bless the producers who make the material that allow us to indulge our fantasies without ending up in jail. And that's why it's good that we have this forum for us perverts and sick fucks to congregate. I'm proud of my fetish and I don't think lowly of others who have it, because ultimately, they're just like me.

You say that people are not born alcoholics. Well, it is pretty much accepted that alcoholism is embedded in your genes and, as with sadism, it is a matter of external influences whether or not it blossoms. My grandmother was an alcoholic...and so am I.

As for the actual poll question: I am very content with having a BDSM-fetish. I rejoice in sadistic fiction and fantasies and actually feel a bit proud of myself to have sufficient self-restraint and a high sense of morality and right and wrong NOT to go out raping and torturing women in real life...just as being sober for almost a decade now. ;)

Before I make my next statement, I need to say that I have absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever for my opinion and I offer no supporting argument to back it up. I do not think one is "born with a BDSM gene". But if that is the case, I would rather not have been born with it because my life would be much easier without it. Either way, I think I am beyond a voluntary choice, so I will continue to wallow in the dark recesses of the internet to satisfy my need. And I am glad I have all of you to keep me company.

Ralphus...I love your posting of old book covers.

And this goes back to my early childhood, I still remember the first time I saw a woman bound and gagged on a cop show and being excited beyond measure. I remember playing with a train set with one of my friends, and we were both pretty imaginative, and making up a story about what was happening on the train, and I throw in, "and in this car there is this beautiful lady and she is tied up with a gag on and we have to save her!" and my friend was like, "Huh?"

Also, I don't think fetishes of any sort are slowly and painstakingly developed, I think they are there in our minds from the beginning and that we discover them, and that when we learn that they are fetishes, a lot of things begin to make a lot of sense. If you think about the most common ones, feet, scarves, glasses, bondage, whatever, the interest for the fetishist is just there, not something they developed or chose.

Hell No

Been bent since the age of five or six when I wanted to see a woman in a pantomime who was wearing net tights and calf boots tied up. Grew up thinking I was going to be a murderer, and then discovered half the world is as bent as I am (okay, well maybe not quite as bent as me).

I figure it would have been a real boring life otherwise. I soon got tired of racing bikes, and dragsters. Found water skiing and snow skiing to be boring pretty quick, went off climbing, diving and a host of other things, but never got tired of tying up chicks and having fun with them.

Only other thing I didn't tire of was combat shooting, but with one fucked up finger on my best gun hand now and wearing glasses, that has sort of taken a back seat these days. What the fuck, won championships, so best quit whilst ahead anyway.

Now, tying up women and building gadgets to torment them, well that's another matter. Every time I think there is no more ways to do it, another rush of shit hits the brain.

BDSM Rocks!

Jeff Gord

We are what we are and that's that -- nothing can change that!

Grey

My blog issues are over and we are posting again, membership is free and there are plenty of free photos to go around. People will have to register again in order to post.

As to the poll I guess there were times in my life when I had wished that I was not a fetish lifestyler. These were times when I had not found my place and felt alone in a world that did not understand my needs. Pair that with catholic guilt and a small town filled with the far right vanilla thumper crowd and you may understand what I mean. My message to anyone searching for a place to belong is that there is nothing wrong with you if you are a lurker and feeling mixed emotions regarding your fetish. No one can explain this but why is the rape fantasy the most popular among women? No, they don't want to be raped in real life but the thought of being taken by a powerful man and forced to do things society has told them is bad is a huge turn on for many women.

That being said, I actually came across paraphilias in my studies (real studies at a university - not just doing my own research).

At present, there is no answer to how fetishes develop. There have been several theories proposed, but all of them have some problems.

There was one scenario in which a very young guy was accidentally touched in his privates by his babysitter - she wore high heeled shoes. The stimulation was mistakenly connected (mentally) to the shoe rather than to the woman.

I think that in the future, these questions might be answered by neuroscience.

There seems to be a hard line drawn by most people between nature (you are born with it) and nurture (you develop it). In science there is rarely an either/or situation. For example, you may have genes that predispose you to certain tendencies, but environment plays a role too in producing behaviors. Some behaviors are triggered by certain environments (the brain-wiring was there but wasn't activated until the environment presented the stimulus), and some behaviors are consciously denied even though there is an urge to carry them out (the urge is biologically based but controlled because the environment "forbids" so-to-speak).

Well, the bottom line is that fetishes have not yet been explained by science.

The Forum Topic reminds me of Woody Allen's line "My only regret in life is that I wasn't born someone else". Could there be any more wasted energy than to wish we weren't something that we have no choice but to be? Is there any emotion of the male human being that is more instinctive or spontaneous than that which causes sexual arousal? I agree with John Galt that we must, at this point, leave it to future neuroscientists to come up with theories as to why one thing is a turn-on for one person and not for another - so as to then (and only then) perhaps control it. In Clockwork Orange the "system" thought it could "cure" Malcolm McDowell's insatiable urge for violence by medicating him and forcing him to watch ultra-violence 24/7. Who can forget the closing scene in which he tells us - through the twinkle in his eye - that perhaps the only thing they succeeded in doing was to cause him to throw up to Ludwig von's 5th.

Perhaps I'm too much of a relativist, but I feel extremely fortunate that my fetishes can be satisfied by moral and legal means. As Ralphus points out child molesters and those who are into fantasies of such things are in a serious fix. Both the act of molesting a child AND the viewing of images of such things are legally and morally wrong, the latter because, in order to exist, it requires the coercion or manipulation of someone who is simply not old enough to be responsible for making a very adult decision. Individuals with such fetishes are probably no more capable of understanding their proclivities than most GIMPers. But they must (must) repress them or otherwise keep them entirely in their heads.

I, like jhlipton, see some shades of grey in some of the GIMP material that is available. Some is pretty convincing, and I wonder how much monetary or physical coercion might have gone into its creation. But even that I could rationalize, as we occasionally learn of the mental abuse that has "lurked" behind the success of some young mainstream celebrities. All in all, we GIMPers are what we are and should be glad that we have healthy outlets for our energies.

Now my answer, NO. This to me is strictly a fantasy, a vast part of which is the being the Knight in shining armor that rescues the female victim (which I guess is why I can't stand the consensual stuff). I have never experienced the desire to tie a girl up against her will or assault her. When I was in my teens I discovered this stuff arouses me, watching a Charlie's Angels or a Wonder Women was much more of a turn on when the girl was in peril. Perhaps I'm different in that vanilla sexual activities in person are still capable of waking up Johnny.

I would much rather have this tendency than something like an attraction to children where there is no legitimate outlet. In that case, you have to fight THAT tendency. I can't imagine what that's like. I guess the key would be to NEVER feed it. My only regret is the cost of pursuing my fantasies in DVD's and VHS tapes thru-out the years. But since I've pretty much given up on the dating scene, and I'm single with no children to support, I don't see it as a negative. Can I get a bit obsessive and overspend at times? Yep, but that appears to be the only negative. No one is going to be filling out any police reports over my "fetish"

As far as those who participate in consensual activities or fighting desires to participate in nonconsensual activities, if the DVD's and pictures keep you from acting out and hurting someone, I can only see that as a plus.

And about your Poll, answer is No, hell to the NO!

I would not wanna be born again without the fetish bug in my twisted brain, and believe me there is a lot of things I don't like about myself and I will wanna change if I can, like having low self esteem, like being too whiny and complain a lot, starting thing and not finishing what I started, being too gossipy and noisy sometimes, see the list is long, but there is other things I will never wanna change and being different and weird and original and pervy is just the way I am, how I roll ha ha.

Dahlia Delis

As I've said, I prefer "movie" bondage over porn produced. For me the story is as important as what's going on, onscreen.

This leads into an interesting website I'm sure you're all aware of... Elite Pain. I think this site blows even Insex out of the water for sheer brutality. It's obvious that the girls submit to the torture here for the money. While sites like Hogtied focus on strict "love bondage" with the girls frequently have orgasms onscreen, Elite Pain makes no such pretense.

The girls are paid to endure the torture, and if they don't, what they make is less or nothing. The whip marks are some of the most brutal I've ever seen, as are the tit and pussy whippings.

For me, this is nowhere near as interesting as a well done damsel scene... but I look on this like a car wreck... it's so hard to look away.

Thoughts?

I am a transgender, a male-female pre-op transsexual, and have lived female for a good portion of my life...like from infancy to age 28, nearly half my life, and if it wasn't for family concerns (parents and sibs) I would have had my surgery in 1975.

I lived in NYC for many years prior to returning home and was active in the tg and bdsm cultures... often playing at TES and Hellfire. Very often as "serving maid" in chastity belt, garter belt, stockings, either knee boots (spiked 5" heel" or locking "fuck me now" 6" heels, armbinder (Leidermeister), ball gag, collar and serving tray (Leidermeister). If it were not for bdsm I could not have enjoyed and cherished, nurtured this part of me which is still valuable and alive today.

Peace and love to all

Hiliary

How would I know? If I had been born without the fetish, I wouldn't even think about it (except to possibly say, "Eww!").

If I could switch it on and off, I think I would, and leave it off most of the time. I'm perfectly happy with vanilla (and even more so with chocolate) that I don't **need** BDSM or snuff, and the others are much more socially acceptable -- it's fun to share.

-------------------------

I can say that I don't have even a hint of the doubt (actually, "self-loathing" was the phrase that first occurred to me, but that is far too harsh a term) that jhlipton occasionally hints at feeling.

I wouldn't go so far as to call it "self-loathing". Even when I've gone so far as to toss my more extreme stuff, it's more with regret than loathing. I'm not sure if the fact that I have a bigger problem with snuff than BD or even with SM might influence my thinking.

It also has to do with my thinking about S&M, I believe. I believe in not hurting people, and helping them not hurt themselves. But those who are masochists get **something** from being hurt -- who am I to deny them that something? I can only wish that whatever caused them to need that hurt could be relieved.

================================

An alcoholic is not born an alcoholic.

I'm not sure I agree with that. There is a part of the brain that controls addictive behavior, and I think that it can be "corrupted" from birth. The addictive behavior might not always be alcohol, but that person is likely to be addicted to something. It's the old "Nature vs Nurture" argument -- both play important roles, and you can't diminish either.

==============================

The girls are paid to endure the torture, and if they don't, what they make is less or nothing. The whip marks are some of the most brutal I've ever seen, as are the tit and pussy whippings.

Not for me, thanks. I like beatings and whippings, but nothing THAT extreme!

I am a big believer in balance, which makes me think we all need a combination of pain and pleasure to keep us moving forward. The precise psychology of (for want of a better word) "needing" pain escapes me. Maybe it is a way to test our physical strength or endurance. Maybe it is the challenge. I don't know, but I am pretty sure that life without pain or discomfort might be too easy, and that we would have nothing to push us to achieve more.

Of course, I am also of the opinion that the Old Testament Garden of Eden was actually an intelligent and thinking person's concept of Hell. No adversity, no freedom of thought, no challenge, no independent action. And no pain. It makes me shudder to think about it.

I once read somewhere that one out of three people are wired the way we are. That's a pretty impressive number.

Jhlipton's comment on masochists reminded my of something a woman once said to me while talking on the subject. "When a masochist asks a sadist to hurt them, a true sadist says no".

Only if in it's place I would've been born with a predisposition for liking thrasher horror movies :) [joke]

Seriously, I agree with all that say both internal and external influences are at work. That is, internals being how we're wired as our minds and bodies are constructed per our DNA, and externals being events, experiences, exposure to sights, sounds and ideas from the outer world. Nature and nurture, it has to be both, how can it not?

For me, at this time, I can say no. It's not an issue for me now. It's fun, and it's not hurting anyone (against their will). Many moons ago, I would not be so sure of this answer. I did have some uncertainty about it at specific times in life where not being "different" from "normal" people would have made life easier.

Turns out life throws problems at virtually everybody, even vanilla sex people can't escape them.

Love all the responses by the way.

-------

Old Testament Garden of Eden...shudder

That's for sure. No internet, no porn sites or gimp forum, couldn't even tell she was naked thus couldn't enjoy it (how were they supposed to be fruitful and multiply again?), no chocolate shakes, no books, no videos, no sports...like they were set up to sin to get out of that place :)

The answer is: Hell No.

I'm glad for it, I embrace it and I believe it is part of who I am.

While I am discreet, I will not back away from the topic if it has been introduced.

Vanilla people whom I trust know about it, and I'd happily admit to anyone else who shares the fetish and related fetishes.

Like anything else, there must be consent, mutual respect and safeguards in place. Other than that, I say screw the roses . . . . .

Interesting to say you would be born with it but what triggered it to come out? A drunk is a drunk in hiding till something triggers he/she/it into being a drunk. An overweight person is skinny till something triggers it so BDSM is out there but what starts it?

Did you see Dale Evans tied up waiting till Roy Rogers came to her rescue? Read in the paper and see a picture of a female bank robber in handcuffs? Maybe an animal in a box trap? Or did you go to a Circus and see the Lion or Animal trainers making some animal jump with the use of a whip while either in a cage or in the center ring and then it goes "Click" Gosh I'm having some impure thoughts. Wonder if the little girl next door would want to play cowboys and Indians and be tied up with a piece of clothesline from the neighbors back yard. I guess you can see almost anything then and wonder could I restrain the girl next door like that?

On the other side of the coin if we do have any girls next door when and what made you think of BDSM?

As a PS Whenever I see today's cover picture what type of hot sauce is white in color that you would want to pour in the Brides Rear End?

Although some excellent points have been made for the "nurture" theory, I am still convinced I was born with a GIMP gene. It was definitely with me when I was a kid watching Saturday morning cartoons. There was no traumatic event in my infant years before I knew I liked seeing women tied up. And there are no repressed memories. I'm sure life experiences may spark some of these fantasies among people. But not me.

As for the poll, without this obsession, I wouldn't have had to experience all those feelings of guilt, all those episodes of secrecy, that constant fear that I would be exposed as a pervert. I would have saved a bundle on money that I spent on bondage equipment, magazines and videos, as well as the time involved. I don't dare enter politics (not that I ever wanted to, nor had the ideas or charisma to pull it off) because a rival could easily do some digging and tell the press: "My opponent rented "Ilsa: She-Wolf of the SS" on numerous occasions in the 1990s."

However, I have made strong friendships directly and indirectly through my fetish. In a strange way, my fantasies have also led me to have a much better awareness of the real-life issue of violence against women.

And I agree with John Galt's statement: People who have no fantasies tend to be dull.

Now I'm not saying I'm the most exciting guy in the world. But I think my GIMP tendencies are part of my overall creativity, which largely got me through school and into my current career. Perhaps if I wasn't a GIMPer, I would lose some creativity. (Perhaps this post might have been more boring than it already is.) I don't know. I do know I am quite happy with the way my life has turned out so far, and I have a loving wife who accepts my tendencies.

If asked the poll question just 10 years ago, I would have been begging to be "normal." I have come to realize I'm not so weird after all, and this forum and all you like-minded pervs who post here really help in that respect. My answer now is not quite a definite "No," but it has moved in that direction.

----------

Ironman wrote: I once read somewhere that one out of three people are wired the way we are.

I would agree with that estimate. Now, the percentage of people willing to admit getting turned on by bondage or rape is another story.

----------

Sardu: I most definitely prefer a storyline behind the bondage. I guess that's why I soon got tired of Hogtied, although there definitely is a lot of good stuff there. Insex held my interest for much longer just because of the sheer sadism involved and some of pd's plot-based vignettes. When a producer combines the harsh bondage/torture with a reason for the action, then it's pure gold for me.

First off thanks for allowing me to post here regarding my blog being up. I goofed up and told members they had to register. They don't, anyone can submit a comment, it just has to be approved for the first time. Thank you again for your kindness.

In case anyone has seen Graphic Sexual Horror I am interested to know your opinion as to the film. The crew of Insex.com fame put this together about two years ago and its at slamdance film fest now playing.

"He-ylp, He-ylp!" Lol.

I may have said "Yes wish I didn't" but now (that it is working for me big time) it's No way in hell

Not only am I "getting some" on a regular basis but am doing related activities when am not 'playing' - Have been making my own Bondage Equipment for past 4-5 yrs......

-----

DHT: That was a pretty wicked video, man. Laughed my butt off. Joe Dante directed a hilarious first season episode of The Masters of Horror anthology called Homecoming that involved an "Ann Coulter" character, politics, and zombies (which is redundant, I know) that you would probably appreciate. The Masters of Horror also featured Incident On and Off a Mountain Road, which as I recall had some notable GIMP moments. I might need to pull that out of my CD archives and watch it again....

-----

Sardu: Penelope Pitstop. *sigh*

Freetranslation.com translation:

The most difficult one is to find partners to divide!!

I gave this topic a lot of thought... In the short, quick thought...Yeah, I might have gotten the "one that got away" if I had not discussed DID's and bondage with her, but then, 30 years later, you should see what a waste she turned out to be (could be Jabba the Hut's wife).

So after really thinking about it... I've met some really interesting ladies - kinky too, worked with some nice models, whose secrets are safe with me, had a lot of fun being the roleplay bad guy, and still have material to draw, even after over 500 works posted here and there.

As I grow older (double nickel next month) the chances to get out and play are fading away, I've lost contact with almost everybody I used to be involved with in the bondage biz (I was behind the scenes, and supplied a lot of uniforms for videos public and "private"). Most of the models have retired, don't want to get involved with the newer ones (they're younger than my daughters) and with the current state of the free flowing money (not) spending any on fetish related items is out of the question.

Would I do it again? In a heartbeat!

Enjoy

NP

I'd love for there to be a Republican spokeswoman who it would be fun imagining being raped, whipped, beat, etc., but I can't think of any right now. Maybe Condi Rice -- god knows, she deserves it!

However, political figures just don't do it for me, although really no one more deserves to have done to them what they routinely do to the nation. Besides, by the time they've "made it" in the political realm, they are not that much to look at. And hot young babes are my favorite GIMP victims.

A few of you have mentioned childhood influences. I used to watch "The Perils of Penelope Pitstop", too. She was always getting tied up, it was great. But even then, I always used to be a bit disappointed that she kept on getting rescued. Anybody else ever get frustrated at the whole damsels in distress thing where the bad guy (and he's the "good guy" in my mind) keeps getting foiled every single time? Just once, I'd like to see a scene where the girl tied to the railroad tracks actually gets run over by the train :)

---------------

Ann Coulter: I hate that bitch. Just because she's blonde and (semi) attractive she's the darling on the Republican party and can get away with saying hateful things and sell millions of books spouting the same right-wing bullshit. I've posted these two pics here before, but since there are some newbies that may not have seen them, here they are again:

Ann Coulter #1

Ann Coulter #2

This is the only way I could stomach Ann Coulter...with her mouth shut. Someone should gag her for real; this would be a better place to live.

---------------

Sgt. Major The two trailers for Graphic Sexual Horror make this one a must-see. Likewise, I doubt it will be playing at a theater near me any time this century, but I'll definitely be checking this one out on DVD.

---------

sgtmajor: I definitely have to see "Graphic Sexual Torture." Thanks for bringing that to our attention.

---------

mb: Does Avril Lavigne get the GIMP treatment in "The Flock"? BTW, I can't really recall any movie that actually puts the BDSM crowd in a good light.

I'd love for there to be a Republican spokeswoman who it would be fun imagining being raped, whipped, beat, etc., but I can't think of any right now.

In my year-end review last month, I said the Republican shill I would most like to see get the GIMP treatment was Leslie Sanchez. One month later, I still feel the same way.

-----

On a different note, when VM said GIMPers became GIMPers through life experiences, I was on the side of the naysayers who thought he must be wrong.

But now I'm not so sure. For it must be confessed that I, too, was a Penelope Pitstop fan. Could it be Penelope unwittingly created an entire generation of perverts?

Bizarre as it sounds, I can recall titillating GIMP stuff from several different children's shows as I was growing up. There was a British TV show called Fireball XL-5 that was one of Gerry Anderson's "Supermarionation" series (which included Stingray, Supercar and probably the best-known, Thunderbirds). They were not animated; they were puppet shows. And in one especially memorable Fireball XL-5 show, the female lead, Venus, was tied hands and feet to a platform underneath a telescope (or something similar) that was pointed at the horizon and when the sun rose it would focus the light and burn her alive. And she woke up and was struggling and as I recall they even went to the trouble of adding sweat to her puppet face as it heated up. And looking back of course I am laughing my butt off because, you know, it was just a fucking puppet! But obviously it made quite the impression on my young mind.

The thing is, I don't think watching that show made me into a GIMP fan. I think that I was already, at some level, a GIMP fan, and I picked that out as the one scene from the entire series that I can remember in fevered detail decades later.

Dr Rice, when she was head of the NSA, was pretty hot. Hey, bitch, you need a plan? I've got a plan for you!

Not exactly in the "political realm", but Elizabeth Hasselbeck (from The View) looks like she could use a bit of GIMP treatment. Meghan McCain and her fellow bloggers (see URL) might be off-limits to some, but I feel that she voluntarily jumped into "the line of fire" so to speak, and thus can be appropriated for our bit of fun.

----------------------------

In my year-end review last month, I said the Republican shill I would most like to see get the GIMP treatment was Leslie Sanchez. One month later, I still feel the same way.

Not bad. Not quite tops for me, but not bad.

=============================

Could it be Penelope unwittingly created an entire generation of perverts?

Are you sure it was "unwittingly"? Bwahahahahahaha!!!!

Are you sure it was "unwittingly"? Bwahahahahahaha!!!!

As I think back to those days -- Penelope Pitstop, Batgirl, Agent 99 -- I just get more confused. No, I'm not sure it was unwittingly. I'm not sure of anything at this point.

Gee, with this chatter concerning old tv series, I must submit the greatest early influence had to be the "The Avengers" whether it be Honor Blackmon, Diana Rigg or Linda Thorsen being bound and menaced by the ever present quirky villain - damn that John Steed for riding to the rescue all the time - yeah, tie her to track and run her over.

Sgt. Major - yeah, thanks for that "Graphic Sexual Horror" heads up - I'm sure that will be a big draw here in the Texas bible belt :).

jhlipton - now, are we talking about politicos or can we throw in the pundits and talking heads as well - that so, I watch when "O'Reilly" has his snotty conservative bitch, Megyn Kelly, and his snotty liberal bitch, Lis Wiehl, and have a special place in my dungeon reserved for both - a battle to the death and the winner is rewarded with some serious rack time.

For WIP fans, found this number over at Asian Cult Cinema - the Japanese still crank them out - click the link for some screen shots - looks kinda interesting.

Stay Well All

First it is amazing the common starts for a lot of the guys here.

That is a very tough question. Some days it would be NO and some other YES. Truth be told it has caused me all kinds of trouble with regular 'vanilla' relationships. It was one of the reasons for the divorce from first wife. If there is sex with anyone it has to be in at least in my mind if not actually happening. I can't really separate the two (plain sex/bondage) if that make any sense at all.

I do happen to think you are born with it - that is I have no choice. Whether it can be turned on and off is debatable I guess. I was tying up and gagging my sister's dolls at 3 or 4 years old. Later I'd sit by the TV waiting for Batgirl or Lois Lane to be on the screen. The weirdest thing at that age is knowing you like something a lot - but not having a clue why. I think the more I think about this the crazier it seems..... Okay I'm back to the flatscreen with Alexis Taylor ball gagged, tied to a pole, wearing nothing but a garter and stockings - nipple clamps and nice very tight crotchrope splitting her pussy....GOD I LOVE this stuff !!

Although there have been times in my life when I've wondered if I was "normal," in the end I wouldn't change a thing. I have been very fortunate to have enjoyed bondage with many ladies, introducing just about all of them to the wonders of B/D.

After learning that trying to hide my interests from my first wife was a mistake, I vowed that if any other relationship proceeded at least to the "semi-serious" phase my fetish would be brought up. I've found that...without exception...all of the partners I've been fortunate to be with over the years were open and ultimately seemed to enjoy sampling the waters.

I've never had a bad experience with a woman where bondage was concerned. I know I'm extraordinarily lucky, but I'm not going to complain about that. The key for me was always to make sure they had a good time. I've found that when I take care of my partner and worry about her needs, even when she's tied up and gagged, everything tends to work out fine.

Even after two wives (the relationships ended for non-bondage reasons) and several serious "significant others" I still count myself as very fortunate. These days I'm involved with a woman who seems to love the lifestyle as much as I do. She claims I've "ruined" her by introducing her to the joys of bondage. Hooray for me, I guess.

In the end, even with some of the shame and self-loathing that I've had to deal with over the years, particularly when I was younger, now that I'm in my mid-40s I'm at peace with who I am. And like others who have written here, I really like seeing Alexis Taylor helpless and tied up! Sigh, what a woman.

On an unrelated topic, there appears to be some possible gimp-worthy scenes in the new Liam Neeson movie "Taken." His daughter and her friend are kidnapped and forced to become sex slaves by a bunch of not-so-nice guys. A couple of scenes have women handcuffed to their beds (by only one arm, rats) but I'm hopeful it offers something more exciting along the way.

Thanks for listening to my ramblings. I'll head back to Lurkerville for a while.

-----

Sloth: Yes, The Avengers managed to play to a number of fetishes and perversions, and remains one of my all-time favorite TV shows to this day.

-----

Brutus: I was curious, so I checked out The Flock for myself. And no, Avril Lavigne does not get the GIMP treatment. Which is a pity. She has only a brief cameo at the start.

I don't really agree with mb that the movie particularly shows "bondage folk" in a bad light. The movie was about violent sex offenders, one of whom tied up and tortured a victim. There was also a walking tour of a "dominion" that had people self-mutilating and doing all sorts of bizarre stuff in a singularly unhygienic environ. It looked to me like a clueless but over-imaginative filmmaker's idea of the squalor in which alternative lifestylers must live.

It also showed that foot fetishists love nothing better than to see pictures of feet cut off of corpses. Really? You know, I like feet as much, if maybe not a little bit more than, the next perv. But I definitely want them soft and pink and attached to a sexy, living babe. This was just a bizarre movie. Several brief views of one girl tied more-or-less spreadeagled to a bed. Brief cutting torture on the leg with a knife. Face licking. Duct tape gagging. Barely worth watching, although possibly if someone took all of the brief disparate bed bondage scenes and strung them together when YouTied comes back, it might be worth a look. Maybe.

-----

Kevin: I think the majority of the GIMPers here are sadists, but it is always nice to hear from a masochist.

Just out of curiosity, when watching GIMP material or reading, do you ever find the victim's plight amusing? I mean, do you ever find your self chuckling or even laughing outright at whatever torment the victim is being forced to endure? Do you ever find yourself thinking "she's getting exactly what she deserves!' I know I do, sometimes I just chuckle, while other times I find myself cracking up hysterically.

I'm usually too busy wanking off to laugh at the victim. And since I like young innocents getting GIMPed, I don't want her to "deserve" it.

========================

On the subject of female politicos, pundits and other P-type critters I might want to GIMP, Michelle Obama is very much my kind of GIMP girl. But there's something so sweet, so loving about her relationship to her husband and her girls (and her mom and brother too), that I can't imagine wanting to hurt her in any way. Funny how the mind works, innit?

An excellent question. For me, one of the elements of a great GIMP scene is that the victim is a victim, much as jhlipton said. Someone who is getting what she deserves is not so much a victim as a recipient of karmic payback. However, I am re-defining a GIMP scene as having to have an innocent victim. Theoretically, a GIMP scene would include any girl in merciless peril, even one who deserves it. And in that instance, under those circumstances, then yes I would be chuckling. That doesn't happen very often, though.

And I do recall chuckling at the treatment of Georgia Van Helsing at the start of "Betrayed" and the end of "Master Control." She was great as the conniving bitch who "has it coming."

---------

John Galt: Thanks for the additional info on "The Flock." Yeah, maybe I'll wait for krisi or someone else to put something together for YouTied.

---------

Interesting to read how our perversions can affect or end our relationships. I've ended relationships because I was convinced the woman would not accept my perversions, even though the subject was never broached. Rather stupid on my part, but it seemed like a good idea at the time.

Just out of curiosity, when watching GIMP material or reading, do you ever find the victim's plight amusing? I mean, do you ever find your self chuckling or even laughing outright at whatever torment the victim is being forced to endure? Do you ever find yourself thinking "she's getting exactly what she deserves!' I know I do, sometimes I just chuckle, while other times I find myself cracking up hysterically.

What kind of a sicko are you that you would actually laugh at a poor woman's misfortune?

Well, apparently you're just as sick as I am since I do the exact same thing :)

When I'm really getting into a movie, like say an Attackers or a ZFX vid, or an artwork story, like say a Wayne Wine or Roberts serial, for instance, I sometimes will literally laugh out loud with delight when the victim gets hers. When she screams loader, I laugh louder. I'll be saying "Yeah, that'll teach the bitch!" and clearly enjoy her suffering. Hey, this stuff is for our entertainment; why shouldn't we get into it?

The best GIMP material makes you feel mean, puts you in the position of the villain. I play along, since that's what I would be doing if I were the one dishing out the punishment. Ever watch Randa Mai's face when he's lashing a helpless young girl with his bullwhip? When he smiles and laughs at his victims, he's not faking it, either. The man enjoys his job. And I would be doing the same thing, I guarantee you. I'm a sadist, I'll admit it. I like to see them suffer.

Yuuka Kokoro will be starring in NSI4. She's a cutie. I like her and so I look forward to this movie.

For next month Attackers releases, I am eagerly awaiting Asami Ogawa Lady Panther 8. The Lady Panther series best fit the GIMP theme. We have a cheesy setting of smart fighting sexy woman thieves captured by the mob and then they were raped and their humiliation and degradation started.

There are usually no bondage stuffs in Lady Panther series. But I like my porn with a background story no matter how silly. That's why I like Lady Panthers series.

And Asami Ogawa is gorgeous. I think this movie will be like Lady Panther 5, the one with Ann Nanba.

-----

mirage: Thanks for the head's up on New Slave Island 4. I agree with you that Yuuka Kokoro is quite hot (I'm going to post some of her clips from ATID-143 when YouTied returns) so it sounds like this will be a movie worth catching. Let's hope this one has some creative spark to it and revives the New Slave Island series.

As for the Lady Panther movie with Asami Ogawa, we'll have to see. I agree with you that the one with An Nanba was excellent and I gave it an A in my review (and that one had some bondage). But some of the other movies in the series have been underwhelming. The one with Nene and Karen Kisaragi should have been much better and the one with Maria Ozawa was actually pretty bad. So we shouldn't get our hopes up just yet.

-----

The Barn (1999)

The Barn begins with blond haired Stacy Burke walking down a dirt road in a long-sleeved white blouse, short-short denim skirt and white pointy-toed high heels. A big gas-guzzling American four-door sedan roars up from behind her and stops. A guy gets out and manhandles her into the back seat, then gets in with her and the driver roars off. Fade out.

Fade in on Stacy in the back seat, with her wrists tied behind her back. Her abductor pulls her up in front of his body and rips her white blouse open to reveal her lacy white bra. Then he uses a switchblade to slice up between her breasts and parts the bra to reveal her breasts, which are unique. Stacy has very large aureoles and largish nipples on unnaturally enhanced breasts. They take some getting used to.

Stacy does a decent job of acting the victim, but she does not fight at all. She just struggles ineffectually, in a manner that is more intended to titillate than escape. That kind of diminished the experience for this GIMP viewer.

The storyline, such that it is, involves Stacy being held in a barn and tortured for no apparent reason. Although there was an abductor and a driver, we only see the abductor. The driver is apparently filming the action, although the occasional flash and clicking of a shutter betrays the presence of a third person photographing the proceedings as well.

Stacy is pulled into the barn, unaccountably with her wrists now tied in front, and teeters around inside on her heels banging on the walls like she could batter them down and escape. She stomps her heels and pulls her wrists apart but never tries to untie the ropes with her teeth, which of course would have been what any self-respecting bondage victim would have done. So at this point let me just say that, at no time during the remainder of the video, is there any serious attempt at escape. Strike one.

Abrupt scene cut and now Stacy is bound AOH, still wearing the open white blouse and cut bra, so that her breasts are exposed, as well as the denim skirt and white high heels. The abductor walks into the scene and uses a flogger on her belly. Stacy gasps and cries out and arches back, but really he is only tapping her with the flogger, so her acting is way over the top given the circumstances. And this is as good a time as any to point out that all of the whippings, floggings and croppings that follow are tame in the extreme and Stacy's over-the-top acting makes for an annoying combination of weak (probably no) pain inflicted that elicits exaggerated responses. Strike two.

Stacy is weakly flogged, AOH, on breasts, belly and legs. Then she is weakly cropped. Her abductor undoes her AOH bondage in the middle of the room and attaches her AOH against the wall. The cameraman turn the camera sideways and we see mostly the back of the abductor. It is a hint of what is to come regarding the less-than-stellar camera work. Which will be strike three.

Once Stacy is fastened AOH against the wall, her denim skirt is undone and pulled down, revealing lacy white panties that matched her bra. The panties are also cut at each hip, leaving Stacy naked from the waist down (except for the white high heels). Well, okay, not completely naked. She is wearing two slender gold chains low around her hips and has a Playboy rabbit head reverse-tanned into her upper thigh.

The camera, meanwhile, is doing a 45-degree angle thing, I guess in an attempt to get as close as possible but still show Stacy from crotch to forehead. (She has a small landing strip pubic patch, but at no time during this video does she actually spread her legs.) She is cropped some more. She is flogged some more. She struggles. Clothespins are fastened to her nipples, and they stand straight out, by the way. More flogging and cropping. The camera work during this sequences makes me think it is being done by a fly, the way it zooms in and out and tilts back and forth.

The abductor brandishes a large flexible rubber dildo and rubs it against her face and breasts before figuring out that it should be applied farther down. Once again, though, the scene fails to deliver as the dildo does not actually do any penetrating. There is exaggerated movement and such, but it isn't hard to tell that all he really does with it is pushes it between her legs. That doesn't stop Stacy from reacting as though she's being impaled by a horse, of course, but it is altogether unconvincing.

Scene jump and clothespins are reapplied to her now-unclothespinned nipples. More cropping. Stacy is cleave-gagged using her white lacy panties. The abductor brandishes his knife again to remove the blouse, but all he does is cuts it away so that she is still wearing the long white sleeves. He also leaves the cut white bra. Now, this is personally very irritating to me. I feel very strongly that clothes and tatters of clothes can be left on during a scene, but they should eventually come off to reveal a completely naked victim.

More flogging. Her hands are unfastened from above her head and leather cuffs are applied to her wrists. Now, at this juncture, I would have taken a moment to pull the sleeves off of her arms, as well as the bra. It would have been very easy to render her completely naked. But alas, that doesn't happen. *sigh*

Her cuffed wrists are refastened together and she is AOH once again. More struggling. The camera twists at whacky angles during this time. Idiot cameraman. Stacy is refastened AOH against the wall with her wrists apart this time. More fake flexible rubber dildo assault, made even faker when the camera drops unexpectedly and we see the guy pushing it against her belly as she acts like she's being penetrated. Another pair of clothespins are attached, so now she has two sticking straight out from her nipples. More breast cropping. There is some clothespin play that was probably rather uncomfortable. We get an extended breast torment sequence that is actually not bad. They applied some rouge or something to the crop so it now leaves red marks. Next we get some rope breast bondage, where rope is wrapped kind of tightly around her breasts.

Now comes the cigarette torture. The guy shows Stacy a cigarette, then lights it and smokes a few puffs. He brings it close to her breast and as the camera moves upward, we see Stacy make a pained face, but probably not the reaction we would get if he had actually burned her breast with a lit cigarette. When the camera moves back down, we get to see some not-too-bad make-up effects of burn marks. While Stacy stands against the wall, the abductor takes pictures and the cameraman actually turns the video completely horizontal. What a nimrod.

Lots of watching Stacy in bondage. I have to say, Stacy does an exceptional job of acting scared and in distress. If her acting was accompanied by action that justified it, this would be major hard-on material. She really is very good, although she would be more believable if she cried or even teared up at any point. Oh well.

Back to Stacy, who now has burn mark make-up on both breasts. A wasted effort. If you aren't going to show the torture, why bother with showing the marks? Come on, get with the program.

Suction cups are applied to Stacy's breasts, although not very strenuously. The guy isn't even sure if they will stay on and releases them very tentatively. Stacy emotes. Pictures are taken. The video work zooms in and out and around. The suction cups are removed. The breast ropes are removed and we get close-ups of the rope marks. The rope bondage goes back on, but this time the ends are pulled up and out and tied up next to her wrists.

Stacy is refastened AOH wrists apart facing the wall. The camera twists and turns. The guy runs a crop up and down her backside, and at one point moves it back and forth in her crotch and Stacy's foot moves up and down kind of like when you rub a dog's belly and his leg moves. It is the closest this video comes to capturing an authentic reaction, I think. The camera goes horizontal as Stacy's ass is cropped. Once again, they applied rouge to the crop so that it leaves "marks." Her ass is spanked barehanded. It is copped some more. Spanked. Flogged. Cropped and flogged as two guys work on her at the same time, with some enthusiasm. The damn camera remains horizontal the entire time.

Stacy is refastened AOH, wrists apart, with her back to the wall again. More clothespins are attached to her breasts and her nipples. The guy plays with the clothespins for a while, then removes them. Close-ups of the marks left by the clothespins. More flogging. Stacy writhes wonderfully, but all out of proportion to the severity of the flogging.

Stacy is unfastened from the wall. Her cuffed wrists are fastened behind her back. Her elbows are tied together with rope. Her thighs are bound together with ropes. She is walked over and laid on the dirt floor, and left there. The thigh bonds slipped down loosely around her knees during transit, by the way, being the sloppiest bondage of the shoot. We hear the car start up and the guys drive off, leaving her bound on the dirt floor of the barn. The end.

SUMMARY: The model is Stacy Burke, who I think is very hot and sexy, even though I am not all that fond of her boob job. Also, this was released in 1999, so she was 10 years younger than, say, today. The bondage is not bad, with a few notable exceptions. Stacy does not struggle at all, so it loses most of its GIMP potential right there. The torment is weak. The whippings, floggings and croppings are without conviction. However, Stacy is exceptionally good at portraying pain and anguish. It is probably because she acts like she is in such extreme pain and discomfort that the weak torment stands out in comparison. There is plenty of time given to watching her struggle in vain, if you like that sort of thing. She is cleave-gagged halfway through and it remains in place. She is not completely stripped, though, which is annoying. The camera work is bad. The sound is not bad, since it is mostly just Stacy grunting, groaning, whimpering and begging, which she does well.

I would give this a C-. My copy of The Barn is 60-minutes long, and I downloaded it several years ago. I did some googling and found that you can purchase it in VHS or DVD from Unlimited Desires for $39.95. Oddly enough, the VHS/DVD is advertised as being 90 minutes long, but when you click on the link to download it, the download advertises that it is 60 minutes long. I don't think it is worth $39.95 to see if there is a difference, but anyone who knows please feel free to let me know. You can also download this from Slave Videos. It is advertised as a "Must Have" for Stacy Burke fans, and I can't argue with that. It largely misses on most of its GIMP potential, though. Sadly.

For those who would like to see Stacy in a consensual but nonetheless rough bondage sex scene that looks for all the world like it pushes her limits more than once, check out the Sex and Submission scene she did with Big Daddy Brady back in 2005.

Ed - I can't imagine not unloading chortles, guffaws and chuckles as the damsel gets her due - stimulation and amusement in one package - that's more bang for the buck.

Ralphus - couldn't get in to thank you for yesterday's book cover - I don't recall stumbling on such a place during my tour in South Vietnam, Republic of, but had I, I doubt I would have come back - perhaps I'll need to book a flight back to III Corps.

Mr. Bush - well, now that Bonnie Bernstein has some time on her hands, perhaps I can work her into my busy schedule for a nice strappado/lashing session - I think she'd be game :)

Stay Well All

I think that Asami Ogawa Lady Panther 8 will be the best Panther movie, better than LP5. Although I must admit, I thought Maria Ozawa LP6 would be quite decent. I don't know which is worse - LP6 or LP7.

Asami Ogawa making an Attacker movie is a shocker. She's a A- actress in the industry and a big name star to make an Attackers film. Ann Nanba and Maria Ozawa was the last 2.

About the film, Asami is a big name so Attackers will likely increase the movie production quality like they did with Ann Nanba previously. But I wonder what went wrong with Maria Ozawa Attackers films.

But of course, what u like might not be what I like. I don't see any ballgags in the movie cover so that's a disappointment. There are some ropes and cuffs. There's an interesting slapping scene + some forced lesbian play on Asami. This movie is a long 3.5 Hrs.

Quite obvious that I can't wait for this movie. I will write a review on LP8 later next month.

As for the Lady Panther movie with Asami Ogawa, we'll have to see. I agree with you that the one with An Nanba was excellent and I gave it an A in my review (and that one had some bondage). But some of the other movies in the series have been underwhelming. The one with Nene and Karen Kisaragi should have been much better and the one with Maria Ozawa was actually pretty bad. So we shouldn't get our hopes up just yet.

Well, mystery solved. Suposedly, the clip continues with a forced pointy object rape that results in the death of the girl, and then the movie ends. Never have seen that, but I am looking into it now.

Anyway, click the link above for the wiki.

The movie itself is kinda artsy fartsy, which goes into the uselessness of a young rich kid and his useless life... blah, blah, blah.

He hooks up with some lowlifes in the end, and the hot rape scene that we've all seen occurs. After that it gets interesting. The kid takes off his clothes and tries to rape the woman again, but by this time, after the oral rape, anal rape, and pussy rape, she has stopped fighting and just lays there, so he can't get it up. Next, he has his two buddies hold her legs wide apart and violently shoves a champagne bottle neck into her. The view is blocked as he kneels between her legs, but its obvious that he's really just a jamming away with the bottle. She screams and thrashes, but that's still not enough for him.

The husband is an avid fisherman, and has the "sword" part of a swordfish mounted on the wall. Once again, the kid's buddies hold her legs wide apart.. he takes the sword, sitting between her legs as before... everybody is screaming "don't do it!" The tied up husband, the woman is struggling and screaming... even his buddies are like, "don't do it!" Still, the kids rares back, the music goes crazy, and... wham! Cut scene to violent black and white world war two footage, crescendoing violins, and then back to the scene. The woman is dead, still tied and spread, her blood and guts everywhere. One of the robbers is throwing up on the floor, the husband is going nutzoid... and then the other robber goes and stabs him to death. The movie ends not long after with the three guys walking into the sunset.

Pretty frickin' violent... Ralphus, you'll be disappointed that they cut away at "the moment"...lol.

If I'm reading things correctly, though, it looks like those Stacy Burke photos that Ralphus posted are from 10 years ago. So much for my comment that she isn't aging well (although the other photos you posted confirm that what I said is true). Still, she certainly ain't looking good in those pics. I have seen her looking much better in some of the clips on YouTied. She also looked much more attractive in the vanilla porn movie, More Dirty Debutantes 113, from 2000.

JAG (Mac captured/kidnapped by (insert enemies here-Iraqis, terrorists, etc.-she was kidnapped by a stalker that Harm killed)

China Beach: McMurphy (Dana Delany) captured by the NVA and taken up the Ho Chi Minh Trail to the Hanoi Hilton (only would work as a series finale)

Pensacola: Wings of Gold: Ice (Sandra Hess) shot down and captured (for Season 3 or the never-shot Season 4)

Battlestar: Galactica-2003: Starbuck (Katee Sackhoff) on New Caprica in Leoben's Hands: he did psychological torture more than physical, but what if he'd done the reverse? Also, Admrial Cain had her men on Pegasus be very nasty to a captured Cylon...

And, of course, any James Bond Movie, with the Bond girl's perils being much more perilous.

Any more out there?