GIMPs that didn't survive (Ver 2.0)

[letvor]

If some of you had been asking yourselves "Where did GIMPs that didn't survive?" I'll answer that question: THE TOPIC WAS DELETED!

I talked with Ralphus. He and Margot have nothing to do with it - and they'll try to find the perpetrator of this vile act! In the meantime, I'll continue posting and talking about our favorite offenders!

DISCLAIMER
In this topic, you can read about real serial killers, rapists, murderers, molesters, psychopaths, and others. The purpose of this topic is not to build a temple for those people, but to search for the connection between their acts and pornography.

Any fictional content (stories, photo manipulations, photographs of porn inspired by the work of people mentioned above) is welcome!

THE GIMP's DISCLAIMER (part one)

This site, does NOT, under any circumstances, knowingly promote any violence of any kind toward any living being. Anything mentioned in the Forum is related to fantasy/fetish only, it is only a figment of the contributor's imagination.

Here, we are not going to promote any violence or encourage anyone to hurt another living being. Posts about real offenders are going to be written as information boards. All comments and other material not directly connected with offenders and historical facts are fantasy/fetish-related.

[La Reine Margot]

IMPORTANT

This forum does not allow images, stories, comments or anything at all that show, mentions, infers and a long etc of under age girls. I say this because I noticed I put a warning about this issue connected to a post that appeared in the defunct thread/topic not long ago. I remember a post mentioning a 9 year old.

I do not delete topics, I may delete a post if I find that it is breaking the extremely few rules, I might lock a topic if there's some issue, like piracy, links to hackers and so on. I locked one thread as requested by its creator.

It could be that when I issued the warning and deleted the post something happened that caused the whole topic to be deleted... I'm still investigating.

To avoid this problem, just DO NOT BRING UP UNDER AGE themes, mentions, pictures.... or anything at all.

That's a NO NO.

[Hofrax1]

IMPORTANT

This forum does not allow images, stories, comments or anything at all that show, mentions, infers and a long etc of under age girls. I say this because I noticed I put a warning about this issue connected to a post that appeared in the defunct thread/topic not long ago. I remember a post mentioning a 9 year old.

I do not delete topics, I may delete a post if I find that it is breaking the extremely few rules, I might lock a topic if there's some issue, like piracy, links to hackers and so on. I locked one thread as requested by its creator.

It could be that when I issued the warning and deleted the post something happened that caused the whole topic to be deleted... I'm still investigating.

To avoid this problem, just DO NOT BRING UP UNDER AGE themes, mentions, pictures.... or anything at all.

That's a NO NO.

Could not agree more. I sometimes feel like those of us with our particular fetishes are already on thin ice as it is. So yeah, nobody needs that shit.

[wulf]

I thoroughly agree about the underage thing. Not even the slightest hint of anything to do with that should be the rule. It would only take one to condemn the entire forum. Besides, we have enough material to enjoy without it.

Thank you Margot for taking action on that. Good job.

[localroger]

These are dangerous times.

It is a bit ridiculous, but also dangerously true that it is not safe to discuss certain topics even when they concern historical events which really happened. The fact that some serial killers chose underage victims is one of those things. Another is American style racially coded slavery. It's unfair that Quentin Tarantino can portray those things (and some quite vividly) onscreen in Django Unchained, but we're not famous Hollywood directors and we have to be careful. I expect more topics to join this collection.

Off-site I am the author, under my true identity, of a semi-infamous self-published work of science fiction which has a bit of a cult following among Technological Singularity-obsessed folk. That story has a couple of scenes of underage sexual activity which are meant to show how bonkers human beings can get in extreme circumstances, and I'm quite sure it would be deleted if it were submitted today and not grandfathered in since the mid-00's. There are also a lot of "bodice-ripper" romances from the 70's through 90's which would probably be quietly deleted. And let us not forget what happened to John Norman, who used to have a whole shelf devoted to his works in relatively small bookstores like Walden's and B.Dalton. I didn't care for the Gor novels much, at least after book 8, but he had a reliable paying audience and didn't deserve what happened to him.

Part of the problem here is that all these industries have contracted until they are run by a very few players who can easily be leaned on by the government even when the leaning-on has no legitimate legal force, and arbitrary policies adopted by those private entities for their convenience or liability protection affect everybody. There is no room for a daring small "first amendment" player like Loompanics any more. If Michael Moorcock wrote Behold the Man today, can anybody imagine it finding publication?

[letvor]

I'm not going to dive into details here but:

Ralphus just told me that the deletion of the "GIMPs that didn't survive" topic was a mistake (not his mistake). It wouldn't be fair to copy a part of PM here.

I'm not going to publish new posts here for now (unfortunately, I do not have copies of old posts). Soon I'm going to start a similar (much simplified) topic, and I hope you guys will enjoy it.