Device

Neto Chaco
Posts: 113
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by Neto Chaco »

I'm 80 by now. Maybe within a year, someone will let me know what the device is named before I'm 81 Oct.1. Thanks for all the input.
User avatar
BobDarkroom
Posts: 485
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by BobDarkroom »

If I understand your question correctly, you are referring to the wooden construction onto which the model is secured, right?

It doesn't look as a standard BDSM device to me but rather as a custom made device designed by one or more creative Masters for their video productions and not intended for sale. Insex and Infernal Restraints just to name a few used lots of dedicated devices just for their video productions.

Therefore, I don't think that device has a specific name.
User avatar
yyy02
Posts: 3990
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by yyy02 »

BobDarkroom wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2025 5:23 pm...It doesn't look as a standard BDSM device to me but rather as a custom made device designed by one or more creative Masters for their video productions and not intended for sale. Insex and Infernal Restraints just to name a few used lots of dedicated devices just for their video productions.

Therefore, I don't think that device has a specific name.[/color]

Plus the "slant box" as I refer to it, was around only in the early days of Kink, back when they were at the Armory in San Francisco.
I was considering trying to email Kink to ask, but I think I'd probably get a young staffer who would probably profess ignorance. If I got a reply at all.

Like the time I tried emailing about this device (shown with hottie Cherry Torn tied to it):
6284_cherrytorn282.jpg

But at least I got the courtesy of a reply.
Sorry Neto Chaco.
User avatar
MasterKav
Posts: 9785
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by MasterKav »

More for our pleasure, than hers.

1.jpeg
2.jpeg
3.jpeg






(the pimple on her ass sort of adds to it for me)
User avatar
MasterKav
Posts: 9785
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by MasterKav »

Break her!


b0.jpeg
b1.jpeg
b2.jpeg
User avatar
yyy02
Posts: 3990
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by yyy02 »

On a slightly different aspect of "Device", don't you think a black vibrator would look more menacing than the garden variety white appliance?
They come in all different colors, with some sexy shapes thrown in these days. Anything but white, please!

Chichi_lbcf_posttime_17.03whitevibbe.jpg
Chichi_lbcf_whitevibe.jpg

black vibrators2.jpg
User avatar
wulf
Posts: 6797
Location: Tornado Alley
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by wulf »

yyy02 wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:36 pm On a slightly different aspect of "Device", don't you think a black vibrator would look more menacing than the garden variety white appliance?
They come in all different colors, with some sexy shapes thrown in these days. Anything but white, please!


Chichi_lbcf_posttime_17.03whitevibbe.jpgChichi_lbcf_whitevibe.jpg



black vibrators2.jpg
I agree. No white vibrators, shoes, or gags.
Slave Rule #1- No matter how bad the pain is, it can always get worse
User avatar
hornythumb
Posts: 4761
Location: Stock car ally
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by hornythumb »

yyy02 wrote: Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:36 pm On a slightly different aspect of "Device", don't you think a black vibrator would look more menacing than the garden variety white appliance?
They come in all different colors, with some sexy shapes thrown in these days. Anything but white, please!


Chichi_lbcf_posttime_17.03whitevibbe.jpgChichi_lbcf_whitevibe.jpg



black vibrators2.jpg
Who cares, eh? If she owns a white vibe then turn it on high and wind her up. :geek:
User avatar
yyy02
Posts: 3990
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by yyy02 »

hornythumb wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:46 am...
Who cares, eh? If she owns a white vibe then turn it on high and wind her up. :geek:
The white vibrator just makes it more obvious that it's consensual and for her pleasure, no matter how she's tied.
I should have put YMMV somewhere in there.

Sorry, inclusion of vibrators is a pet peeve of mine, and once the vibrator makes an appearance I shut off.

I think I asked the Forum once about the whole concept of "forced pleasure" and didn't get an answer.
So is "forced pleasure" plausible?

I'm thinking it will be crickets once again. :?

I mean, pleasure is so much a state of mind as well...
Sort of like with anal sex?

Maybe this is the wrong Forum to ask.
User avatar
wulf
Posts: 6797
Location: Tornado Alley
Contact:

Re: Device

Post by wulf »

yyy02 wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 5:43 pm
hornythumb wrote: Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:46 am...
Who cares, eh? If she owns a white vibe then turn it on high and wind her up. :geek:
The white vibrator just makes it more obvious that it's consensual and for her pleasure, no matter how she's tied.
I should have put YMMV somewhere in there.

Sorry, inclusion of vibrators is a pet peeve of mine, and once the vibrator makes an appearance I shut off.

I think I asked the Forum once about the whole concept of "forced pleasure" and didn't get an answer.
So is "forced pleasure" plausible?

I'm thinking it will be crickets once again. :?

I mean, pleasure is so much a state of mind as well...
Sort of like with anal sex?

Maybe this is the wrong Forum to ask.
I'm really pissed off.
I typed a really long response to this post. Took me like an hour and a half (I'm slow), and when I went to post I found out I wasn't signed in when the sign in page popped up. I clicked it and signed in, but my entire response I wrote just disappeared. If the site is going to tell me to sign in, do it BEFORE I type a reply to a post please. :x

I may try to redo this reply tomorrow... maybe.
Slave Rule #1- No matter how bad the pain is, it can always get worse
Post Reply

Return to “Open Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests