A question of electrocution?

[jm6d]

I just watched again the electrocution of Lyen in Martial art 3 and of Ariel in Martial art 4 and a difference was clear. Lyen had a piece of wood in her mouth to protect her tongue while Ariel hadn't. How come? We also saw a metal dildo being used on Lyen while that area of Ariel was free. Thus my question is if somebody could describe the difference between these two scenes from the productions perspective? As we do not see so much, especially not of Lyen, we really don't know what happened.

Thank you!

[Pedro]

Lyen's scene in Martial Law 3 was a scripted movie where the scene was meant to show a 220 V serious electocution scene. If that was real, the body would tremble without control and an injury of the tounge could be likely...

So to make the scene authentic we used the piece of wood in the mouth.

If we did not use that in Ariel's scene that was an error in our part.

Of course actually that was not needed, as the actual device we used to use is a TENS unit which produces painful electro stimulations, but far from being as dangerous as the tounge should be kept safe from accidental bites.

The other part: Lyen was a porn star and she was ok with a metal dildo used on her while Ariel was not even comfortable being fully nude on screen (this was her second time I guess) and she was not happy with a dildo being inserted into her pussy.

Does this answer your question?

[jm6d]

Yes, it mostly does.

However, what was the role of the dildo? Did it carry electricity? Was the same places of contact used in both occasions?

And a comment:

The beauty of Ariels nudity! The pictures from behind! Oh!!!
Yes, Lyen is beautiful, but not quite as beautiful.

Thank you!

[Pedro]

The dildo was actually an electro play device, and I think it had the different poles (+ -) at different ends of the dildo, so the pussy was under torment.

In case Ariel the (+ -) was actually on one of her nipples, even if you saw electic wires to both nipples, the two poles were not on the different nipples, because that would have been dangerous even with low voltage. So in case of nipple electro play the + and - should be placed on the two sides of one nipple. This way the nipple gets a really painful treatment, still the electricity won't travel towards the other nipple.... crossing accidentally the heart.

I hope this is clear...

The same thing is true about the Escape Room electro scene (if I remember well, that had one too)

[jm6d]

Thank You!

No, I have no more questions. Electricity always means questions for me. For instance I always wonder how close to reality the scene I see is as one sees no welts, no blood, all is inside.

Thank you for good explanations!

[bakerboy]

Thank You!

No, I have no more questions. Electricity always means questions for me. For instance I always wonder how close to reality the scene I see is as one sees no welts, no blood, all is inside.

Thank you for good explanations!

.... also, it is called " a good acting and directing."

[jm6d]

.... also, it is called " a good acting and directing."

Well, you have a point there, in mainstream movies with much resources I would never trust electric play. It would probably be false. Probably, I wrote, maybe I should change it into certainly?

But I trust the answers of Pedro. Yes, the wood was unnecessary, one nipple did not get any electricity. But due to the reactions I think that electricity was used, and due to these reactions I suppose it felt severe. Maybe I am stupid, but that is my belief.

Anyhow, seeing these ladies on the parrot's perch is great. I suppose that could not be a card as one probably cannot hang to long, but the view and the torture made those movies. The long back whippings were also great, but for me some sexiness elevates the torture and the back in itself is not particularly sexy.