Even links will suffice, don't worry.xs70 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 12, 2025 4:31 pm Speaking of video, I have been experimenting with 5 second animations lately. I was thinking of posting a few. Anyone know what's the best way for posting video on this forum? Stable Diffusion's preferred video format is .mp4. The files are pretty small, like 3-4MB.
Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
I blatantly stole yyy02's scenario, as it lends itself well to animation.
Sam's already-tormented big tits bouncing from the hard fucking gradually brings her back, confused and in considerable discomfort.
https://motherless.com/8F4EB87
"Welcome back, Samantha. How are your breasts?"
https://motherless.com/BD98D3A
Sam's already-tormented big tits bouncing from the hard fucking gradually brings her back, confused and in considerable discomfort.
https://motherless.com/8F4EB87
"Welcome back, Samantha. How are your breasts?"
https://motherless.com/BD98D3A
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
xs70 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 14, 2025 5:31 am...it lends itself well to animation.![]()
Sam's already-tormented big tits bouncing from the hard fucking gradually brings her back, confused and in considerable discomfort.
samantha5_1.jpg
https://motherless.com/8F4EB87
"Welcome back, Samantha. How are your breasts?"
samantha5_2.jpg
https://motherless.com/BD98D3A
Beautiful job!
I had already messed around with this brief video, so have a look at the "Breast Work Breast Appreciation" thread as well.
And everyone could use more Lena Paul!
Well, in a few minutes anyway.
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
One for Wulf
https://motherless.com/4250779
PS: I'm making these in 720x1260 resolution, but Motherless seems to scale the videos down to 460x720 maximum which downgrades the quality, and doesn't allow non-premium users to download (which was the solution I was thinking of). Anyone know of an alternative? Or is this fine?
https://motherless.com/4250779
PS: I'm making these in 720x1260 resolution, but Motherless seems to scale the videos down to 460x720 maximum which downgrades the quality, and doesn't allow non-premium users to download (which was the solution I was thinking of). Anyone know of an alternative? Or is this fine?
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
Movieflapxs70 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 8:02 am PS: I'm making these in 720x1260 resolution, but Motherless seems to scale the videos down to 460x720 maximum which downgrades the quality, and doesn't allow non-premium users to download (which was the solution I was thinking of). Anyone know of an alternative? Or is this fine?
1080p ,no sign in download right click on video, you need an acc. to post
Movieflap... https://www.moviefap.com
My movie... https://www.moviefap.com/videos/b6c23bb ... t-one.html
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
I Love it, and thanks for sharing.xs70 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 8:02 am One for Wulf![]()
jennifer.jpg
https://motherless.com/4250779
PS: I'm making these in 720x1260 resolution, but Motherless seems to scale the videos down to 460x720 maximum which downgrades the quality, and doesn't allow non-premium users to download (which was the solution I was thinking of). Anyone know of an alternative? Or is this fine?
Slave Rule #1- No matter how bad the pain is, it can always get worse
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
Fun with Shannon
https://motherless.com/41D4A24
https://filebin.net/g36ygxja3d3t7ol2 (HD)
The HD link will expire in 6 days, so get it while it's hot.
Looped so it can be set to repeat.
https://motherless.com/41D4A24
https://filebin.net/g36ygxja3d3t7ol2 (HD)
The HD link will expire in 6 days, so get it while it's hot.
Looped so it can be set to repeat.
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
As always, excellent work.
I noticed that basic AI models (checkpoints), even finetuned NSFW ones, can't draw unusual objects on the human body. For example, electrodes, wires, needles... You need special LoRa for that. Do you make these LoRa yourself or get them from somewhere? Or is it really just Photoshop?
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
Thanks.Max-Plank wrote: ↑Wed Oct 22, 2025 1:19 pm As always, excellent work.
I noticed that basic AI models (checkpoints), even finetuned NSFW ones, can't draw unusual objects on the human body. For example, electrodes, wires, needles... You need special LoRa for that. Do you make these LoRa yourself or get them from somewhere? Or is it really just Photoshop?
It depends on what family of models you use. Flux indeed won't do any of that stuff. Most Illustrious basemodels will. This image resulted from an experiment with Qwen, one of the recent new (Chinese) models. It's pure text to image, no Photoshop or specialized LoRA involved.
Last edited by xs70 on Thu Oct 23, 2025 7:37 am, edited 10 times in total.
Re: Experimenting with Stable Diffusion
.
Last edited by xs70 on Thu Oct 23, 2025 7:37 am, edited 6 times in total.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests