Previous - September 2008

Next - November 2008


October 2008

Name: A Canadian

Man, sometimes it feels like whenever the discussions here reach a healthy level of engagement, we get hit with some sort of Internet problem.

I don't have any helpful information but I do hope this situation is resolved smoothly.

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 03:21:56 AM

Name: John Galt

Hazel... Bound, Bitted, and Banged (Powershotz Video Clip, 2008)

It was with some trepidation that I viewed my next Hazel clip, so certain was I that nothing will ever top Hazel...Try Before You Buy. And it is possible that nothing ever will. However, Hazel is still as hot and sexy as ever, and she is bound similarly, and she is being fucked by her boyfriend and his real penis again, and she is role playing a victim again. So all the ingredients are present for a wonderful GIMP experience.

Hazel is on her hands and knees on a small table or bench with a metal piping frame erected at the front, so that her chin is resting on the cross tube. Each arm is tied to an upright and her ankles are crossed and tied together. She is role playing the victim and her assailant (or master) enters the scene, walks around her and touches her and does some mood-setting talking. She starts out ball gagged, but he removes it in preparation for forcing her to fellate him. She pleads "no please" and whimpers and generally makes known her reluctance to blow him. So he installs a dental spreader gag and cranks it way open to the point where I thought it looked damned uncomfortable. I have a friend with TMJ and I couldn't have gotten away with that on her. Then he fucks her mouth and goes deep enough to gag her. Oh yeah.

She sort of agrees to blow him right, so he takes off the spreader and takes hold of the back of her head and does some deep throat fucking. She cries and whimpers and shakes her head and her eyes water in a wonderful forced oral sex scene.

He moves around behind her and tells her he is going to fuck her and she begs him not to in a very convincing manner, although she doesn't get hysterical or overly panicked. Still Hazel sells it.

When he penetrates her, Hazel's facial expression and cries are magical. If she wasn't feeling some pain or discomfort, she fooled me. I mean, obviously she is role playing but still, that doesn't mean she isn't feeling something. You know?

Hazel is fucked hard. The bench she's on audibly rocks forward. He pulls her hair hard and forces her face up. Her mouth works soundlessly and then not so soundlessly. She is play-acting and then she isn't play-acting and it is fun watching her move back and forth between the two states. He smacks her ass a few times and you can tell she wasn't really expecting it. At one point, after pounding her forward for a while, he stops and pulls her back so that he can go back to fucking her really deeply. It is a nice long scene filled with sound and fury signifying rough sex.

Unfortunately, at one point she starts screaming "oh yes, fuck me deeper" which would betray a purely nonconsensual rape scenario. However, I hasten to add, it is apparent that she is into the extremely rough sex and the pain associated with it. So that still makes it hard-on inducing material. He is pounding away at her and she is screaming for more when suddenly he stops and walks around in front of her and just barely makes it to her mouth before he shoots his load. One shot goes right into her mouth but the rest mostly coats her chin and lips and she spits that initial load back out and you can hear it splatter on the bench below, which was kind of cool. But I was disappointed that she didn't take it all in and swallow it. Or that she was made to take it all in a swallow it. Oh well.

We finish up with Hazel sucking his cock for an extended length of time and we get one of those fades where we're seeing her sucking on his dick and we see her awesome rear end moving up and down all at the same time and it is still distracting. She begs him to take her with him and that she'll do anything he wants, and I have to say, the thought of having Hazel as my personal sex slave would have convinced me.

So this is a role play scenario, with Hazel as the victim of a brutal rape. She is a wonderfully expressive victim. The sex is rough and hard and deep and yes I could tell she was performing in places but I could tell she was not in other places. It was a bit discouraging that it turned consensual, but the way the story developed actually he broke her and made her into his willing sex slave so that's something. It's all very psychological, but there's a difference between someone going consensual because they like it rough and someone being broken and going consensual. It's a tough call, but I'll go with a B+. I'll be watching it again.

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 04:09:37 AM

Name: Brutus

Ralphus: Damn, that certainly sucks about AOL. I'm no technical whiz, but I would be more than willing to help out in any way possible. If we can't find a new hosting company in time, what exactly would be required/needed to save all your work? Please keep us informed.

Bill Zebub wrote: "... it's not the "Lady in the Box" story."

OK, so can we have a synopsis of "Breaking Her Will"? Or better yet, are there any scenes of interest in the movie for a retarded perv like myself? I think you made a good choice with Jackie Stevens, who is certainly easy on the eyes. So what happens to her in the film?

John Galt wrote in his review: "... at one point she starts screaming 'oh yes, fuck me deeper.'"

I really hate when that happens. But "Hazel... Bound, Bitted, and Banged" still sounds like a hot clip. Thanks.

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 07:13:41 AM

Name: Steve Power
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Thanks for the review of Hazel! The reason she begs him to fuck her harder at one to make it appear that she is enjoying it for the censors. In many of the clips you'll see the victim suddenly announce that they want it harder. The other common theme is to have her ask for his phone number after....or to have him take her home willingly at the end so that it doen't appear to be a kidnap. It's hoaky and wouldn't be included except that it could keep us from getting shut down.

The tearful flogging scene with Hazel is really good too. She cries real tears.

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 08:39:05 AM

Name: ZFX'r


Haven't posted in a long time but this situation is dire...

That is such crap AOL is pulling...F' them! I got rid of them years ago because of their junk behavior towards customers. I just found this listing of free hosting providers via X-Biz, an adult industry site...hope this offers a solution:

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 11:26:51 AM

Name: Jefferson James
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Ralphus, what I really hope is that an arrangement like mine comes your way. For years my site has been hosted by fans or friends. I currently have a really cool forum on my site, inspired by this one, that no one is using.

There are GIMP fans out there that have servers, I'm sure of it. Hopefully, one of them will step up and offer you some free space. Making your requirements known, might help. Ten AOL screen name accounts would add up to about a gig of space, wouldn't it? That is nothing on today's servers. What sort of throughput?

Maybe, on the other hand, it is time to sell advertising and pay for space. I am shocked Tripod has worked as well as it has for you. Free sites are notoriously flakey. I think most of us would much rather see ontopic ads than the pop unders and banners you are currently running.

A sponsor or anonymous host might save the day.


Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 12:59:26 PM

Name: YikYakker

Holy Jeez, on top of everything else, is YouTied still functioning? I haven't been able to get through. Anyone else having this problem? Dawg, life is hard for us pervs.

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 02:58:38 PM

Name: MasterDetective
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Hi YikYakker..

Yes, YouTied is still up, but experiencing bandwidth problems. Traffic to the site had increased by about 50% in the past two days, and I think it overloaded the servers.

I've been diagnosing it, but there still seems to be something goofy about the servers, and I don't want them back online until I find out what it is..

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 04:33:31 PM

Name: HCKeys
Homepage URL:

Jessica Alba strikes again with another gimp-worthy election-related picture. God Bless America.

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 07:38:21 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

I don't really have time for a long post tonight. Thanks to everyone for their concern. Scribbler and I are exploring what options are out there to avert this crisis. Nothing definitive yet that fits what we have here on the site. A lot of these sites don't allow rape content, for instance. Some are too slow to load, and none so far allow hotlinking. And no ISP offers even close to what we're trying to replace. So far it's not looking good, but we're not done searching yet.

And as Jefferson suggested, if there are any GIMP fans out there that have servers that can volunteer free space, please let me know. I'm trying real hard to preserve this site and make it free for everyone, but obviously, we're looking for help, and there's not much time.

Wednesday, October 1st 2008 - 10:32:29 PM

Name: John Galt

Hazel...Anal Trained (Powershotz Video Clip, 2008)

This clip is the prequel to Hazel...Try Before You Buy. The setup is that Hazel is being sold into sexual slavery and her buyer is coming over to "try her out" and the guy selling her wants to make sure she can handle all the buyer's attentions, so he wants to prepare her for anal penetration. So we have Hazel role playing the victim again.

This clips builds up in an impressive manner. When you watch it over and over (I'm speaking from experience here) you kind of want him to get on with it. But the first viewing is an exercise in slowly developing suspense.

Hazel is struggling and whimpering and looking around fearfully. The guy walks in and talks to her. I am not a big fan of talking unless it is done right, and I am happy to report this is largely done right. He calmly tells her she has a buyer who was quite excited by the pictures of her and he's coming over to try her out. And he's going to want to try out her mouth and her pussy and you know where else? He keeps trying to get her to say her ass, but she never does. He runs his hand over her and probably gives her a little poke in the way of an unnecessary hint, but still she doesn't speak up. She does gasp and whimper and grunt and cry out, though.

Next, her back and backside are oiled up, and it is a nice long teasing oiling, to be sure. I was just waiting on pins and needles for him to stick his fingers into her, but he never did. Still, the tease was incredible. Lots of split screen so we can see Hazel's expression and her backside being thoroughly explored and oiled up. Part of the enjoyment of seeing her teased but not violated was watching her also waiting for the violation, tensing every time his fingers strayed close, just to slide on by.

The guy walks around in front and picks up the ribbed glass rod and dips it into the jar of Vaseline right in front of Hazel's face, so she knows what's coming next. She is appropriately apprehensive. Split screen mode again as the ribbed glass rod is moved up and down along her cleft and over over anus, reversing direction but then once again just sliding back and forth. Fearful expectation is written all over her pretty face.

When the glass rod starts working its way into her, she is clearly discomfited by the violation. She isn't fucked hard with it, but it manages to penetrate pretty far, and her reactions are wonderful to behold. We get a triple split screen a few times, so we can see the rod sliding in and out of her asshole, her face showing pain and distress, and her feet doing a precursor to the great things they did (or will do) in Try Before You Buy.

This clip does not have the violence or urgency of its sequel. Once again, Hazel shifts between playing the victim and actually being uncomfortable with the anal probing and, according to Steve's comments in regard to this video, the oiling down and exploration of her naked helpless body and sex by someone other than her boyfriend (the prospective buyer who does a number on her in the next clip). However, it is a powerful and exciting video clip in its own right. Bondage nonconsensual anal violation role playing with a bonus of actual discomfort. I think it is fair to give this a B+.

TOTAL NON-SEQUITUR OBSERVATION: During this video, the camera stayed close-up on Hazel's lovely face as she was being felt up and spanked and her expressions were extraordinary to say the least. Especially her mouth as she opened and closed it and grimaced and gritted her teeth and if I didn't know any better I would SWEAR that Hazel's mouth is the same mouth that sings the theme song from the beginning of The Rocky Horror Picture Show. And I mean that as a compliment, because that was a very expressive mouth.

Thursday, October 2nd 2008 - 02:47:14 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

YouTied is back up.

Thursday, October 2nd 2008 - 03:26:35 AM

Name: Scheer
Homepage URL:

This is a review of Gerard Titsman's website as it was in September 2008, and some of the films on it. Reviews of websites, unlike those of films, tend to date as websites evolve.

First I should introduce myself. I live in the UK and there is no legally available porn to buy here that interests me - nothing. Importing discs is too risky (I know to my cost) so the only alternative is to download. My tastes are mild compared to most on here: I empathize with the victim and like a girl to be dominated and humiliated by men (not women) and made by circumstances, or force and ropes, to succumb. She could be spanked, groped and then forced to orgasm by fingers, dildo etc. I don't like rape, blow jobs, whips, electrics and the more extreme tortures (the Japanese Train Molester type films are the ones that give me the most bang). However I am interested in many of the films discussed on here because they often include parts that I like.

In the following review I've tried to identify what most Gimpers would appreciate and the gradings are set accordingly. As it happens they mostly match my own personal gradings too.

Gerard Titsman is a Frenchman who seems to have inherited a most unfortunate name resulting in him having a constant desire to explore the female breast (this subconscious desire to follow a path dictated by your name is sometimes known as Nominative Determinism. Other examples would be Richard Bacon, the pig farmer, or Rick Masters, the dominator of women. I'm not convinced of the idea myself - I've frequently been called a 'Wanker' but it's had no effect on me). As a result Mr. Titsman has made a lot of films with a heavy emphasis on tits and these can now be downloaded from his website.

First of all membership costs $20; cheap I think, and this gives you one month to download what you wish. The site itself is easy to use and guests have access to all the information so you can explore the site fully before deciding whether to become a member. Only membership allows you to download the films. There are nineteen of his complete films plus a number of compilations and other bits and pieces which include clips from those films but also other scenes he's recorded. Some of his completed films are not available yet. All of the complete films are in MPEG format as are most of the compilations, but some clips are in MOV (Quicktime).

The films are arranged in clips of four to six minute lengths making them easy to download, and with a download manager (I use Get Right) they can be downloaded in batches whilst you do other things on your PC (such as reading your favourite forum perhaps). There's no Digital Rights Management (DRM) so you can edit and store on a DVD if you wish. Quality is variable but acceptable - pixel size varies, either 352x288 or 704x576. Some of these films were made in the 1980s I think and so can be a bit grainy. Mr. Titsman's arty side comes to the fore at times (strange filters, wobbly dream sequences - usually to the films detriment; slow motion, odd camera angles - sometimes beneficial). Not all his films are well edited. The girls are French, and with one exception are voluptuous and attractive. Nearly all have hairy bushes.

Mr. Titsman posted on this board a while ago - click on 'Notable Guests' and you'll see his first post was on January 19th 2004. I think he posted for around a month after that and explained his intentions and choice of models.

I won't review all the films but five have obvious Gimpworthy possibilities.

103 Le Moulin. A short haired girl comes across a house in woodland and is allowed in. It's occupied by GT himself, sporting a mask - quite frankly he looks more evil without it. He ties her hands over her head to a beam, removes all her clothes without ceremony and ties her legs apart to a spacer bar. He then proceeds to maul, grope, slap and pinch, mostly her breasts. He uses a cane, whip and crop on her arse and breasts. Later he bends her over and uses a bunch of sting nettles to stroke and whip her bottom. Mostly she suffers it well, moaning convincingly. C+

102 Kidnapped and Trained: This film is two scenes. In the first, a blonde girl cycling on a woodland track is knocked off her bike by two men in a car. She runs off but of course falls over and is caught. They drag her to a clearing and tie her hands to a branch overhead and remove her clothes (to the obvious joy of the woodland birds who sing happily). They remove their belts and hit her, mostly on the arse. The men then take it in turns to maul her before they both decide that more belting is required (the birds sing their approval). One of our boys finds a branch about the size and shape of a broom handle and decides there's only one place for it: he struggles gamely to push it up her vagina and finally jams it between her and the ground. More belting is called for before they decide to lob her in the boot of their car. B-

The second part is in a dungeon of sorts. Our same lady is taken out of a cage practically naked on all fours and is very submissive. GT himself is Master of Ceremonies. She's kneeled on the floor, is mauled and tit slapped and then some nipple clamps are attached. She's then tied over a bench, whipped and spanked. She's then stood up, a neck strap is attached and this is roped to the ceiling, along with her arms. More tit slapping and then a dildo hanging from a hook is installed in her vagina with more whipping and slapping to follow. Blondie's not happy and her mascara runs. Some suspension follows, her hands and ankles tied to the ceiling and she's again whipped and some dildo play. Finally she is tied on all fours to a frame on the floor, and a dildo machine is used (rather gently I thought) with a bit of light whipping before she is returned to her cage. B-

104 Service apres-vente: In a homely scene, GT is sitting comfortably by the fire with his mask and long haired wig on smoking a cigar, presumably his normal mode of relaxing. He's bored as his television is broken. At least I assume it is as the television repair girl arrives with her tool box (which, some might regret, plays no further part in the proceedings). She's dressed in a boiler suit and hat. Maybe she's late because GT cuffs her hands behind her back and ties them to the ceiling. He then sits down and gradually removes the boiler suit (and hat thank goodness), of course mauling her at the same time; this is surely a nicer idea for entertainment from his chair then any TV programme. Once blondie is naked he decides arms over head is a better position and then mauls, slaps and fiddles with her voluptuous body - yes, this is a very nice idea.

A bit of cropping and then she's stood on two stools, legs apart, still arms over head. A whipping, installation of two labia clips and chain and more whipping follow. Clips removed, the girl is suspended horizontally from the ceiling face down and Gerard slaps her breast, also using spiked gloves, spiked pads, and lit candles to further torment her mammaries, along with mousetraps on her nipples. Finally she is suspended vertically legs up, whipped in private places and ending with the whip handle shaped like a dildo inserted in her pussy. For sock fetishists, she keeps her little white ones on all the time. B+

101 La Lettre Part 1: Isabelle arrives at GT's flat dressed like a business woman. Her coiffured black hair looks like a wig. She hands GT a letter (la lettre - impressed with my French?) and proceeds to his punishment room where she undresses down to a basque and stockings. This reveals her larger then average breasts, ideal material for Mr. T's ministrations. He gets her to jump about a bit so her breasts flop around then ties her arms over head (revealing hairy armpits), places ten clothes pegs on each breast and instructs her to shake them. With the pegs still attached he unties her and she has to do more jumping whilst holding her hands over her head. Tied up again, pegs removed for tit slapping. Isabelle is now put on a table on her knees, hands tied to a bar with a spiked mat under her dangling tits. She's spanked and whipped. Still on the table her tits are placed in a Workmate (a vice like device) which is tightened. More arse whipping and spiked glove work on her breasts. Still in the Workmate, her breasts are tied and lightly cropped. B+

203 La Lettre 2: More of the same. Isabelle has more naturally looking light brown hair and the same underwear. This time the punishment includes some pussy teasing with a pipe cleaner (no insertion), clothes pegs on her labia, and a session where she is on her knees on the table and held between to bars, bent over with her hands above her head so that her substantial breasts are left hanging, an obvious invitation for GT to do his worst. On the bars are spiked balls on chains and if Isabelle wobbles her breasts around these balls strike them. Why should she move her breasts? Well, GT has cunningly placed some lit candles underneath them! Not content with this he whips her arse. Later he has her tied on her back although whilst she's lost the basque and stockings (good) she's gained a slip (bad) but this soon moves from the most interesting areas. He whips her all over then ties a rope to her breasts, loops it over a beam and pulls on it. The result is that Isabelle is pulled upwards. A little tit cropping and whipping follow. B-

Isabelle also appears, with her breasts, in 205 Hard Exercises.

204 Underground Dreams: Just a brief mention of this film. At one stage, GT decides that Anita needs washing (perhaps he's read my 'smell' post). She is naked and appears to be tied. With his shirt off GT soaps Anita all over but it seems her breasts are particularly dirty and require lots of attention. The shirt off GT is not a nice feature but a bonus is the bathroom has a large mirror and Anita's disapproving facial reactions can be seen in this. Because of her response I found this very sexy. Later Gerard espies a stiff bristle brush (that you would normally use on a carpet) and decides to use it on Anita. This is not done roughly but it still doesn't look too pleasant. Unfortunately for this operation, GT is naked, which I found a step too far!

There's a short summary of all his films here:

However I don't think the DVDs are currently available.

So, to summarize, you won't get anything that can be truly described as torture, and no rape or forced orgasms. Where there's bondage it's only mild and the only semi intense scenes are in the films I've described. Generally I think his site is worth the $20 though as you do get lovely girls and some good situations (if your name has some connection with breasts, you'll have no choice of course).

It's never enough though is it! For me, I wish he had employed his fellow countrymen Godfrey du Spank and Gordon le 'Forced' Orgasm.

Thursday, October 2nd 2008 - 05:04:20 AM

Name: John Galt
Homepage URL:

Scheer: Thanks for the review of Gerald Titsman's website. I am always on the lookout for websites that might provide more entertainment. The GIMP forum put me onto Powershotz, for which I will be eternally grateful because I think it is golden in its use of beautiful amateur models and scenarios that come enticingly close to what I personally like.

It sounds like Titsman's site isn't as much in line with my taste. I am not a fan of hairy bushes, and hairy armpits kind of turn me off. (This is probably entirely unfair and nominally racist, but when I think of French women, I think of hairy bushes and hairy armpits and, coincidentally, I think of smell in an unpleasant sense, which is spooky based on your previous olfactory oriented post. Maybe that's a stereotype?)

I am also not a fan of large breasts, which I think generally puts me in a minority of pervs, if not men in general. I like them to be just right, and they can even be on the small side, but huge floppy boobies do nothing for me. So it sounds like the aim of Titsman's cinematic endeavors misses my personal target by a mile.


(Kind of a site review follows.)

Have you checked out Restrained Elegance? Hywel is based there in the UK, and the site features primarily beautiful UK models, generally on the amateur side but also some well-known bondage names show up there occasionally. Chanta Rose had some photosets there in the distant past, but now she shows up occasionally as a guest rigger, punisher, and general dominatrix, although she is rarely clad all in black leather.

Restrained Elegance primarily focuses on photo shoots and still images, but more and more video clips are showing up. The quality is phenomenally high. It is extremely low GIMP material, as there is rarely any threat or violence associated with the shoots. They are mostly straight bondage, although the bondage setups look convincingly painful at times. However, I will say that the humiliation and punishment aspects can be quite severe when they veer off in that direction. Hywel's partnership with his muse, the beautiful submissive but spirited Ariel Anderson has made for some strict bondage, humiliation, and harsh punishment photosets and videos. Ariel Anderson's Slave Girl Training and Long Term Bondage video sequences were often quite harsh. You can sometimes download preview video clips (WMV formatted) of new updates and archived materials.

The videos and photosets are cycled in and out. The last time I was a member (March 2008, I think), the new photosets and videos were available for about three months before they cycled out. Every day there is a new update, plus an old photoset or update, which is quite a lot of material on a daily basis. Hywel is very responsive to requests on the site's forum as well, so if there is a specific set you see in the cycled-out archives (which are still available for purchase), you can ask and sometimes he will cycle them back in as the "old" daily update.

The models really are exceptionally attractive. They are frequently fully nude but sometimes they are clothed in (what else?) elegant outfits or they are partially clothed or they are in lingerie. It depends, I think, on the comfort level of the model. There are no big, hairy bushes, although there might be a closely cropped pubic patch or a landing strip or something. Sometimes there is no pubic hair in evidence at all, which is fine by me. There are big breasts and small breasts and everything in between but for the most part they are natural (or at least remarkably natural looking). There is no underarm hair. And I imagine they all smell like heaven.

Membership is $29.95 for the first month and $27.95 for monthly renewals after that. The site is extremely easy to navigate and the forum was pretty active while I was paying attention. I may have to rejoin for a month because as I as perusing the site while writing this review I noticed a new update of Jade and I'll need to be getting that before it cycles out. I hesitate to give it a GIMP grade because I didn't go there looking for GIMP (I went there looking for Jade, as a matter of fact) and it is not really a GIMP site. It is elegant bondage with a nice touch of harsh discipline.

Thursday, October 2nd 2008 - 09:30:27 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

Scheer: Thank you for the comprehensive and well-written assessment of some of the Titsman films. I'm not familiar with his movies but it sounds like he does at least some stuff that is up my alley. I may have to check into this.


John Galt: You're putting everyone else here to shame but we do appreciate all your contributions. Hazel...Anal Trained sounds a little too consensual to me. If I were to check it out, it would probably be to check the accuracy of the Rocky Horror lips comparison.

Thursday, October 2nd 2008 - 04:33:32 PM

Name: Ironman
E-mail address:

I really hate to hear the bad news. Unfortunately, I am not server savvy and can't be of help in that department. The best I can do is to offer storage space for later retrieval.

Thursday, October 2nd 2008 - 07:30:24 PM

Name: John Galt

Cindy...Bitch Pounder (Powershotz Video Clip, 2008)

Cindy is back in a new Powershotz video clip. She doesn't do quite as much distressed crying in this clip, which is a shame because she looks so wonderfully victimized when she does. Nevertheless, we are treated to some nice, hard bondage sex and that is always a good thing.

We begin with Cindy bound kneeling on the training bench, having been left for a lucky construction worker to find. She is gagged with a bone gag. She is also gloriously naked and looks so inviting, with her nice natural breasts hanging forward. I would like to think if this ever happened to me in Real Life that I would quickly rescue the damsel in distress, but looking at Cindy has me wondering how just how gallant I would really be. You know? The construction worker evidently agrees with me both that rescuing her would be a missed golden opportunity and that her breasts are unnaturally attractive because one of the first things he does is cups and caresses them. Cindy is not fighting or whimpering. She seems resigned that she is going to be a sexual plaything.

First she is made to suck the guy's cock. When he walks around behind her she asks him not to fuck her, but he promptly penetrates her and starts banging away. Cindy makes grunting and gasping noises, but the most noise is made by the bench as it physically moves with each powerful thrust. He grabs her mouth and chin and holds her head as he rams her. It is some incredibly awesome hard fucking.

Next, he announces that he's going to fuck her ass and proceeds to do so. She looks uncertain as he positions himself and responds when he violates her. It does not greatly pain her but it is not all that comfortable, from her expression. While he sodomizes her, he hand gags her mouth and pulls back on her head, forcing her head up and holding her back against him as he drives into her. He also slaps her butt as he rides her. It is quite a sight to see, with Cindy in minor distress and her lovely breasts bouncing back and forth. As far as rough sodomy scenes go, it is as good as it can be without the victim screaming in agony. Very energetic.

When he announces he's going to come, Cindy moves into playing-the-victim mode, uncertain whether she doesn't want him coming up her ass, or figuring out he is going to pull out and come in her face. He removes all doubt when he tells her he's going to come and she's going to swallow it down. Then he pounds into her meaningfully a few more times to get his head up and she kind of cries and strains. He makes her say "fuck my ass" and she sounds lovely doing it. He does her enthusiastically as she cries out for another minute or so. Quite awhile, actually. I was kind of jealous that he could do her that hard and that long and not end up coming immediately. I'm thinking I would have. Then he pulls out and walks around to the front and blows a wad onto her cheek, even though her open mouth was right there. Oh well. I guess all that hard fucking screwed up his aim. He has her suck his dick for awhile and asks her if she wants to go home with him so he can fuck her even more. She begs to be released to go with him. He unties her. helps her down, picks her up, and carries her out of scene.

Well, I was less than pleased with the happily-ever-after ending. Cindy is less expressive this go-round. She doesn't scream as much as I would have liked. The cock isn't shoved deep enough down her throat to get a severe gag reaction. The cock isn't thrust deep enough in her pussy to get a scream. The cock isn't big enough to make her cry when she is sodomized. But then, I'm twisted and I wanted severe GIMP, while this is unlikely to get Steve arrested and closed down. The scene is definitely worth watching for the hard bondage sex. But as a GIMP grade, I would go with a B-.

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 12:43:03 AM

Name: Scion, The
Homepage URL:


I see nothing has changed here, new shills but shills none the less.

Powershotz: Not a big fan, basically a low quality Sex and Submission. If your into these types of scenes, check out S&S they are way better.

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 01:07:25 AM

Name: Scheer

Ralphus: Thanks for beautifying the Gerard Titsmam post. Looks nice! I'm sorry it required additional work for you in these troubled times.

John Galt: Thanks for the tip on Restrained Elegance. I checked the site and downloaded the sample films. You describe it accurately but the truth is, they did absolutely nothing for me: whilst looking at the films I found myself wondering what the music was! I know for sure they won't do what I want due to the fact that he's UK based.

Lest you think I have a smell or hair fetish, I merely mentioned these things, the hair anyway, in my review because I know some do, or don't, like it. If I have a preference it is for a full bush. This could be because that's what I was brought up on. In particular in my early years I had a girlfriend who didn't shave anywhere, not legs, armpits; well, only her face occasionally. She was quite a hairy girl in fact and her hair was dark. We once had a moustache growing competition and she won! Mind you, her hair was softer. I wonder where she is now? Perhaps she works on one of those 'Hairy Girl' sites.

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 01:19:11 AM

Name: John Galt

Well, Scion, The, thanks for the tip, but I have been a member of Sex and Submission and I check back in every once in a while. The site has its pros and cons but it is wholly lacking in what I personally like about Powershotz, which is the amateur model quality. I am not denigrating or dismissing Sex and Submission or the models who appear there, but I'm pretty sure that with very, very few exceptions, any of them has a problem with huge cocks from unknown men freely entering any of their orifices. They are more of a professional caliber of adult performers. The models are also, to my way of thinking, considerably more experienced, typically a bit "harder" looking, and in many cases well-known BDSM performers. (They are also unusually heavily tattooed, but that seems to be a common attribute these days.) I like S&S for what it does, but my tastes are not so narrow that it fulfills them all.

If you like S&S, though, you might also check out Fucking Dungeon and Fucked and Bound. They are both more of the same, with a few different standard models. Not that I am shilling for the sites, you understand, but just to be helpful I thought I would mention them. Unfortunately, their forums are considerably less spirited and interesting than this one, but I didn't really join those sites for their forums anyway. So I would not be so declasse as to comment in their forums simply to tell them I didn't like everything they had done. They would probably just tell me to fuck off.


Scheer: Hey, different strokes for different folks. But no, I did not think you had either hair or smell fetishes. I read your comments as observations and I was simply replying in kind. In fact, it sounds like you are far more cosmopolitan than I when it comes to accepting and appreciating different aspects of the female of the species. I don't even really like the female subjects of Reubens' paintings, which you might have deduced from my predilection for smaller breasts in general.

I had forgotten about the music in some of the Restrained Elegance videos. Well, it just kind of goes along with the "elegance" part of the site. The Ariel punishment clips I watched didn't have any music to speak of. The soundtrack was mostly master-to-submissive talk and the whack of whip or flesh against flesh. All punishment and no sex wasn't really my cup of tea. But oh my god the models were some real beauties.

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 05:09:25 AM

Name: Steve Power
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John, Thanks for the review of Bitch Pounder. Go back and watch carefully while he is butt fucking her. She squirts out her ass. It's very humiliating and shows on her face somewhat. The resolution isn't high enough in the clip to see it well. I agree with you the clip wasn't as dramatic as it could have been.

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 06:00:23 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Well! As if we didn't already have a large enough crisis with the site, now we've hit upon an all-new problem. Right now, every single page we have on Tripod comes up briefly and then an ad pops up and blocks it out. I don't know exactly what is going on, whether we have a technical problem or whether Tripod is blocking us because of content. We've never had a problem with them at all for over 9 years. It's not like that on at least one other Tripod site, so it's not everyone, but for sure, we're affected big time. Check it out.

I sent off an e-mail to Tripod. At the very moment when time when we're racing against the clock to try to save what we have, Tripod's automated reply said it would take 24-72 hours just to get an answer.

Can life suck any more than this?

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 11:54:27 AM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: Well, this is certainly interesting:

Using Mozilla Firefox as my browser on a Linux workstation - everything seems to work fine. The Rape in Mainstream Movies, Rape in Adult Movies, and Whipping Scenes database pages all work fine for me.

Using Mozilla Firefox as my browser on my W2K workstation - I get a CONTENT ENCODING ERROR (invalid or unsupported form of compression) just trying to access the GIMP homepage. WTF? I use this all the time on the W2K workstation, and I do a butt-load of browsing, but never to read the GIMP site.

Using Internet Explorer on a Windows XP SP3 workstation and a Windows Vista workstation - everything worked fine ONCE, then does as you describe.

Using Safari on a Windows XP SP3 workstation - everything works fine, although when I was clicking through to the Whipping Scenes for Women database I got an advertisement that wouldn't let me proceed for about 5 seconds. First time I've seen that. Is that new? If so, maybe it is being implemented badly and causing issues?

Using the Opera browser on my W2K workstation - everything works fine.

Sounds like some HTML or javascript modification with the advertising that is interpreted (or misinterpreted) by browsers differently. Sounds like a Tripod issue.

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 02:34:51 PM

Name: Brutus

Ralphus: I don't seem to have that pop-up ad problem using IE or Firefox. Maybe Tripod has already fixed that glitch?

Scheer: Thanks for the well-written reviews of the Gerard Titsman works. I'm not too familiar with his stuff, but it sounds like he isn't into gags, which are a must for me. However, the torture in "203 La Lettre 2" is intriguing.

John Galt: As always, I appreciate all your work. As for "Restrained Elegance," I agree that the models are all gorgeous and the photography is excellent. But their stuff is way too consensual for me.

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 04:15:32 PM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

Interesting. I get a pop-under ad occasionally (when I turned block pop-ups off in safari) , but otherwise tripod pages load the same as before with a banner ad on top of page. Same in Firefox. But then I'm on a mac. Can only go by what PC surfers are saying. Yep, sounds like tripod issue, hope they fix it.

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 04:18:41 PM

Name: BigD

Ralphus, best of luck with this site, I'll keep my eyes open as well...... Lately, I haven't seen many mainstream movies listed here for gimp scenes as in the past, so I thought I'd recommend a couple

#1 The Lodge --- Nice gimp scene. No nudity of the victim, but it's very creepy when the young woman is tied to the bed and raped, and she's super cute too...

#2 The Ridge - Awesome movie!! Again, no nudity, but that doesn't matter to me, because the hot victim is tied to the bed in her panties and bra for 1/2 the movie and he threatens rape a couple of times verbally to her and breaks her toes while she screams as she's tied to the bed... My favorite line by the psychopath is "when I finally take you, you won't be able to sit down for a month!"...I guess he was implying that he was going to rape her anally, of course he didn't, but still a great movie!! I just think the whole story of the movie is awesome...

I rented both of these at Hollywood Video in the "new" section. Just an FYI......

If ya rent them, post your thoughts....

Friday, October 3rd 2008 - 05:28:32 PM

Name: Scheer

Brutus, I can confirm that Gerald Titsman rarely uses gags or blindfolds. In both of the La Lettre films there are no gags or blindfolds, but in '102 Kidnapped and Trained' the girl has a scarf or similar tied round her mouth for the whole of the first part of the film. I think it's in '103 Le Moulin' that the victim is blindfolded.

Saturday, October 4th 2008 - 01:24:10 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

So far, 2008 hasn't been a great year for GIMP movies. I know that in the films I've reviewed, the highest grade I've awarded this year has been a B+.

This means there's actually an opening here for Bill Zebub, if he gets it right, to produce the best film of the year. It might sound preposterous. But when you think about it, his movie is inspired by an amazing story. His lead actress, judging from the few pictures I've seen, looks pretty hot. Bill can shoot some good stuff when he actually focuses on the action and avoids the silly camera/editing tricks.

Certainly, many of us will be shocked if Bill pulls this off. But in a year when someone like Barack Obama can (likely) become president, I say anything is possible.

Saturday, October 4th 2008 - 06:09:34 AM

Name: A Canadian

Not so long ago, Ralphus mentioned some of the current cases of pornographers being prosecuted. In one of those cases, Max Hardcore has now been sentenced to 46 months in jail by a Tampa judge.

Saturday, October 4th 2008 - 07:26:32 AM

Name: BigD

Wanted to make a title correction to that gimp movie I just listed below. It's called "Red Ridge" not "The Ridge"..

Excellent mainstream gimp movie....

Saturday, October 4th 2008 - 03:05:39 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Site update report: I heard from Tripod yesterday and they said basically that everything was fine, and that I should try refreshing my browser and clearing my cache. Well, I did that and the problem with all the features remains. I still get popups that block out the entire page, and it doesn't matter which page you access or how many times. I know it's a problem that doesn't appear to affect everyone here, judging from the posts we've gotten from others here, but obviously some of you are noticing it on at least some browsers. Me, I use the crummy AOL browser and also Internet Explorer and it occurs on both. I asked a friend today to try it and he reported that he did indeed have problems. So now I know it's not just me, which is still small consolation since Tripod, the only people who can actually fix it, claim there's nothing wrong.

IMPORTANT: If anyone here tries to access any of our special features (the reviews, links, or any of the databases) and you get the popup that blocks the site, please post here and tell us which browser you are using when it happens. I passed along John Galt's information to Tripod in hopes that it can be helpful to Tripod is locating and fixing this problem.

I'm entertaining a few offers from friends as far as hosting all the pictures we'll be losing at the end of the month when AOL closes down their free space. Nothing definite yet, but we're trying to find solutions. Hopefully we might hear something soon. Either way, it's going to take a LOT of work.


John Galt and Scheer: It's late, to be sure, but thanks very kindly for taking the time to grace this board with your reviews. I know those take time and we certainly do appreciate the efforts. Since I can no longer access Tripod on my part, I've been unable to add them to the Reviews section, but I intend to in time.


The Powershotz vs. Sex and Submission debate: I have to go along with John Galt on this one. If you're looking for bondage sex and these are your two choices, I'd go with Powershotz, too. A lot cuter models over there as opposed to the "harder-looking" pros they have on S&S. This is by no means true across the board, just what I've noticed from the few preview pics. And I haven't seen a lot of action from either company, so I can't give a definitive answer on which one handles it better.

I'll tell you I saw a short preview clip on YouTied that impressed me very much. It was by Fucked and Bound and it's exactly the type of action I prefer. It looked like a nonconsensual rape clip. Anybody know if their stuff is worth ordering?


A Canadian: Even if the new Bill Zebub film does indeed turn out to be good, I can tell you it may not even be out in time to qualify for the best film of the year. He just finished shooting it and posted that it would take a few months to edit, so more likely, it will be out early next year.

Will it be any good? Well, I've read the rough draft and seen the pics and if he pulls it off, it should be damn good. But then again, I saw his Jesus Christ Serial Rapist which was full of bondage and torture and it was one of the worst films I've ever seen. This is still Bill Zebub we're talking about. He definitely has a lot to prove.

The best film of the year this year? It's sad to admit, but it's already October and this year is zipping along at high speed and I've seen precious few films this year, good or bad. Like it or not, most of my free time this year has been spent working on updates for the site instead of kicking back and watching and reviewing movies like I used to. The flood of reviews John Galt has dashed off the past few months are incredible to me, not just in the length and quality of his productivity, but because comparatively, I'm not even in the same league as far as having the time to watch all those shows. And it doesn't figure to get better anytime soon, either, what with all the work I'm about to lose and have to recover.


The Max Hardcore sentencing: A HUGE miscarriage of justice. I've seen a bit of Hardcore's work and while it's not my snort of coke, it's definitely NOT obscene. 46 months in jail? Gee, it's so good to know that a threat to society like Max Hardcore, a guy who makes movies, is behind bars while murderers and rapists are allowed to walk the streets. Don't forget this happened in Florida, home of ZFX and Rick Masters, so artistic freedom isn't free and no one is safe, not in this country and certainly not while the Republicans remain in power. Hang in there, come November, change is coming.


At around 3:30 AM on the morning of October 3 (I know because I was up working on the site), this site got its one-millionth hit. Of course, it's a lot more than that since we didn't start keeping track until 4 years after we opened, but still, it's a bit of a milestone. Hits for this forum are higher this year than we've ever had, averaging over 1000 hits per day over the last several months. So it's a credit to the many regulars who visit here every day that we've been successful. Thanks to all of you for supporting this site.

Saturday, October 4th 2008 - 04:28:46 PM

Name: Ironman
E-mail address:

Ralphus: I get the ads with Internet Explorer.

Saturday, October 4th 2008 - 07:24:04 PM

Name: Steve Power
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

I'd like to weigh in on the Max Hardcore sentencing.

My thesis has always been that porn prevents crime. That display of rape prevents rape. That good porn causes stressed out sex maniacs to whack off so they don't go out and actually do the crime.

Max was sentenced in Florida....Florida is where we are always hearing about sex crimes being committed. In fact each time I hear about a sex crime being committed it is usually in an area where people don't have access to porn. Think about it....some of these religious cultish environments....states where bondage porn isn't sold in adult bookstores...and often from random dudes that can't afford porn. Each time I hear a new story on TV I check to find out if the dude had access to porn and quite often they do not. When people are provided porn...they become less violent. It's just a fact of life. Find me a piece of porn in Afghanistan or Iran for crying out loud.

I'd expect to see an increase in the crime rate of Florida after this conviction. In fact I can see it happening to the whole country.

The state is jailing their most important crime fighting weapon.

Fucking Idiots!

So they will use fascist tactics to jail their pornographers while watching teen murder in prime time....and waging wars where civilian casualties are anticipated and expected. All the while thinking they've done the right thing for society. This side of government is the reason people need to hang onto their guns.

Saturday, October 4th 2008 - 08:50:02 PM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: That particular Fucked and Bound update was in fact a role play scenario where Hollie Stevens played a nurse at an asylum who falls victim to inmate Brandon Iron and included "tickling to hard slapping, forced orgasms to hand gagging and of course plenty of deep throat blowjob training and hard fucking." To see pictures from that update, go here and scroll down to the second Hollie update. It was pretty hot.


Sex and Submission, Fucking Dungeon, and Fucked and Bound: Compare and Contrast

I have been a member of all three of these sites at some time during 2008, and I am happy to give you my thoughts on each one. I liked them all, and they are all very similar, but there are also some very specific differences. Viva la difference.


Sex and Submission (

I began my relationship with Peter Acworth and with the Hogtied site several years ago, when Peter was the rigger. It was nice, but it was all bondage and vibrator or dildo-on-a-stick (and even a combination of the two) action. That wasn't bad, but the site drew the line at sex. I checked out all the sites and they all stopped short of bondage sex. Then along came Sex and Submission and it was the first pay site that I saw that included bondage sex. And it was glorious.

Sex and Submission starts and ends each session with an interview (which I generally skip unless I am interested in the model). The sessions are broken into discrete parts, and the first and last part are the interviews. The intervening parts generally comprise separate ties and situations. I use a video combining program to combine them all into one long sequence, but it would be easy enough to just watch the sequences you like. I am obsessive-compulsive, though, so I have to have them all in sequence so I can fast-forward through the boring parts. Go figure. The sessions go one of two ways. Consensual bondage discipline and sex shoot, or role playing.

First, the shoots are mostly consensual bondage-discipline-sex. The model is bound in some extreme bondage ties, including suspensions of all kinds, hogties, AOH, spread-eagle, face up, face down, upside down, you name it. There are some very innovative ties. The feel of the session is that the rigger is doing his best to push the model's limits and the model is testing her endurance. There is master-submissive talk and punishment and discipline, including spanking and whipping and flogging. Electro-torment is rare. ( has a separate site that specializes in that: Wired Pussy)

Every once in a blue moon, one of the consensual bondage-discipline-sex shoots involves known adult industry performers, generally appearing with their current significant others. Stacy Burke did a memorable shoot with Big Daddy Brady that was interesting for a couple of reasons. First, Stacy seems to have a low tolerance threshold for a bondage model, making me think she mostly acts the part. Second, Big Daddy Brady seemed to be pushing her limits quite a bit during the shoot with some harder fucking than it looked like she wanted. (Mmm.) Then Ginger Lynn showed up for a session with Mark Davis. Ginger Lynn was my first porn crush but that was over 20 years ago and she was, well, 20 years younger then.

In the main, though, the Sex and Submission models are maybe three-fourths BDSM performers and one-fourth newbies. A disappointing majority of them are heavily tattooed, even the newbies. This is not unique to this site, though. They are for the most part professional performers and have that hard edge. It is difficult to believe, no matter how much noise they make, that they are being fucked hard enough or deep enough to actually be feeling the pain their cries would indicate. Some are better actors than others. But the fucking is usually nice and hard, and with the model bound in an uncomfortable position. Sex generally includes oral, vaginal and anal, although some performers specifically forbid anal penetration. Condom use depends on the model, but condoms are used more often than not (although not during oral sex).

Second, there is the occasional role-playing scenario. These are my favorites and naturally they are rare. Occasionally there is a role-playing scenario that is a consensual sex fantasy, which I feel is a cheat but what can you do. Sasha Grey did a role-play where she was a journalist who fantasized about being bound and fucked. It was kind of a cheat but she is so hot I enjoyed it anyway. My personal experience is that Sex and Submission does few role playing scenarios that include rape. Alas.

Sex and Submission is, as far as I am aware, always female domination (primarily a single model but sometimes more than one) by one or more males (although usually just a single male). And there is always bondage sex, hence the site name. The site had some standards early on that have more-or-less gone away. Originally there was no ejaculating on the model's face. That changed. There was a rule against the model crying. I think that may have changed but I am not certain. Condom use was a rule originally, and then changed to model preference.

There are several "regular" models who show up in the pay sites, a few exclusively but usually they cross over between companies. The "usual suspects" are well represented by Bobbi Starr, Sasha Grey, Annette Schwarz, Lexi Belle and Amber Rayne, to name a few of my favorites. There is generally a single male (Mark Davis while I was a member), but sometimes there are guest riggers.

In summary, the site always has hard bondage and almost always has extremely hard fucking, although whether it is hard enough for the model to actually feel is questionable. I don't mean that to sound crass, but these are largely professional bondage sex models and they are probably used to every hole being penetrated by the largest cocks in the industry, so it is probably a matter of survival that they take it in stride. It does not diminish my enjoyment of the shoots, but this is not where I go to find first-time (or one-time) models straining to handle what they are being put through. Even the "first-time" models seem to have a higher level of tolerance. Gags are used maybe half the time.

Each shoot has a lot of high-quality pictures and several video segments--usually six or more. There is one update per week. The site membership is $29.95 for one month, $49.95 for two months, $59.95 for three months, and $97.95 for six months (which works out to about $16.33 per month). You can view all of the shoot "cover pages" without joining, to give you an idea what the model looks like and what bondage situations are employed. You can also search the database of all models, so if you have a favorite model or performer that you would like to see tied up and fucked, you can see if did it. (The database search covers all of the sites, by the way.)


Fucking Dungeon (

My first exposure to Ogre Kebneched and Dungeonbank was Society SM. It was a bad experience, because I was turned onto Society SM by a banner ad that featured Masuimi Max and after I paid my money to join I discovered no Masuimi Max. Apparently the site had crashed sometime before I joined and nothing was backed up, so it had started over just a few months previously. I was pissed. But then I followed Ashley Fires over to Perfect Slave and while that was mostly a Hogtied clone (hard bondage with dildo/vibrator penetration), I did like some of the models. So when Fucking Dungeon began, which was the Sex and Submission clone, I checked it out.

Fucking Dungeon is more of a role play scenario site. In most cases, the set up is that customers come in for bondage sex with models, kind of like a walk-in service where you order up a call girl to tie up and fuck. What, there are places like this in the US? I have got to get out of Texas. So these are almost always consensual, featuring models who are dungeon submissives. I cannot think of a single Fucking Dungeon shoot that was a rape role play, or even a nonconsensual sex role play. There is a lot of spanking, flogging and whipping,

The site features a few models who do not show up on the competing sites, but there are also a lot of the "usual suspects" who do shoots. The bondage does not tend to be as severe as Sex and Submission, although there are some unique rigs that Fucking Dungeon employs on a regular basis. One of my favorites is a metal tube device that holds the model spread-eagled with no support except a small back (or butt) pad and with the wrists and ankles tied out to posts. They are always right about pelvis height, which makes oral, anal and vaginal sex very easy. They can be face up or face down.

Something else I personally like about Fucking Dungeon is that one of the scenes almost always ends up on a bed, and every once in a while the model is actually bound spread-eagled and fucked. Sex and Submission rarely uses a conventional bed, and when it does the model is usually tied perpendicularly, with the ankles tied one to a head post and one to a foot post, and the same with the wrists. But Fucking Dungeon does it a lot more.

Once again, these are generally professional models/performers and look "harder" than, you know, the girl next door. Same observation as above, in that I doubt there is any real distress no matter what noises they make. But it is always hard bondage fucking. And there was one pleasant surprise, which was when Aurora Snow showed up for a bondage sex shoot with "Master Jay." Holly Wellin and Cindy Crawford also did Fucking Dungeon shoots.

In summary, this site is very similar to Sex and Submission, but in my estimation it has slightly less severe bondage. The fucking is just as hard, though. The role playing is almost always the dungeon submissive being used by a customer. I cannot think of a single shoot where the model cried tears. It seems to me there are fewer condoms as well. Facials are a regular feature. Gags are used more often than not.

Each shoot has a lot of high-quality photos, although generally fewer than Sex and Submission sessions. There are also fewer video clips than Sex and Submission--usually three, but sometimes (albeit rarely) there are more. The membership is $29.95 for one month (recurring) or $64.95 for three months (non-recurring). You can view all of the shoot "cover pages" without joining to scope out the models and situations. You can look through all of the Fucking Dungeon models in one place, but it does not search across all of the Dungeonbank sites.


Fucked and Bound (Twisted Factory)

I discovered Fucked and Bound just a few months ago. I was aware of Chanta's Bitches, but I didn't know Chanta Rose had a site that competed with Sex and Submission and Fucking Dungeon. I am glad I found it.

There are more actual role playing shoots on this site than either Sex and Submission or Fucking Dungeon. They are not all role playing, but the ones that are sometimes have rape scenarios and sometimes have submissive sex slave scenarios. I prefer the former, of course. The scenes seem a bit grittier to me, the punishment seems more severe, the bondage a bit more raw, and the fucking a bit harder. I'm not sure they all are, but they sure seem like it.

The models are the "usual suspects" but some are unique to the Twisted Factory sites. I haven't seen any "special" guest models on this site. I keep hoping Gauge will show up on one of these and submit to some severe bondage fucking, you know? But probably not this one. The bondage rigs are generally comparable with the other two. The sets are more spare, but really what more do you need than a desk or barrel to bend the model over as you fuck the hell out of her. There is copious flogging, spanking and whipping. There is almost always oral, vaginal and anal penetration. Ejaculate always ends up somewhere visible, either on the face or somewhere on the model's body. I also saw tears on rare occasions.

In summary, Fucked and Bound seems just a bit edgier to me. Everything seems a bit harder and more severe. The role playing scenarios tend to have a higher violence potential.

Each shoot has pictures and videos. The pictures are high-quality. There are usually about six videos per shoot. You can visit the site and peruse the shoot "cover pages" without joining, which gives you an idea what happens during the shoot and also what the model looks like. A one-month membership is $24.95, a two-month membership is $39.95, a three-month membership is $49.95, and a six-month membership is $79.95 (which works out to $13.33 per month). In addition, Twisted Factory offers an "all-access" membership that lets you in Fucked and Bound, Chanta's Bitches, and Captive Male. One month is $39.99 and three months is $79.99. I did the all-access membership so I could check out some of my favorite models on Chanta's Bitches but I didn't look into Captive Male at all, since male domination doesn't do anything for me. Those are the only three Twisted Factory sites.


I liked all three sites. Sex and Submission has the more intricate bondage setups and the most shoots for viewing. Fucking Dungeon seems to have prettier models by and large. Fucked and Bound seems to have harsher punishment, harder fucking, and more nonconsensual-oriented role play setups. But it is all a matter of degree, since they are all generally comparable.

On none of these sites will you see a rigger oiling up and then slowly working a glass rod into the ass of a cute and generally innocent looking anal virgin while she grits her teeth and cries out and curls her toes. That's Powershotz territory all the way.

Saturday, October 4th 2008 - 10:04:09 PM

Name: weewilly

Ralphus: I have the problem using XP, Internet Explorer, and Norton 360.

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 03:50:34 AM

Name: pvdadp
Homepage URL:

I've just stumbled onto, a hotter version of Mood. For those who like breast, belly and pussy whipping as well as other options (needles, etc.) that are beyond my level of desire to see, these movies seem remarkable. The site offers a variety of free jpegs of each film, plus a substantial trailer for each. The films can be bought on DVD or downloaded directly.

Anyone actually downloaded one of these who can tell us if they keep the promise?

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 04:54:45 AM

Name: Thanagar
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Thanks for the excellent overview of the three websites. I've subscribed to F&B, and seen a representative number of S&S videos, and so I can vouch for the accuracy of your comments. I'm sure they'll help prospective subscribers make an informed decision. By the way, has just started a new site called Public Disgrace, which features bondage sex in public locations, and it looks interesting. I doubt there'll be much in the way of nonconsensual sex due to the nature of the videos, but I find the trailers fascinating, so I might give it a try.

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 06:54:54 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Although I'm not into online porn, I enjoyed reading your assessment of those different websites. Certainly, Ginger Lynn has come a long way from her New Wave Hookers days (she's clearly been eating well) but she still turns my crank in her own MILF way. I'm not sure I can say the same thing about Stacy Burke. A while back, someone posted some recent pics of Stacy and she didn't appear to be aging well at all.


A quick head's up: I have sent some clips from New Slave Island 2 to YouTied. Once they show up (they need to be encoded by MasterDetective), I will post my review. Like Ralphus, I wish I could crank out the reviews the way John Galt does but ultimately I have to work at my own Canadian pace.

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 07:43:38 AM

Name: weewilly

After viewing the few pictures from of Bill Zebub's "Breaking Her Will" posted on this forum, I can say that I'm intrigued. The actress has a nice figure and looks attractive based on her IMDB photo. What's more, she is topless, bound, gagged, and blindfolded in the pictures, which suggest a high degree of submission. What torment she endures is not yet clear - at least to me - but no doubt this will reveal itself in the fullness of time.

As a longtime BDSM aficionado, I have developed a keen eye for spotting good material and separating the wheat from the chaff. There are some telltale signs that I look for when evaluating new material. In the few posted pictures for "Breaking Her Will," there are indicators that raise some doubt about this production. Two negative indicators are the loose, sloppy rope work and the loose-fitting ballgag. In my experience, productions about submission always turn out disappointing if so little attention is paid to details about the reality and effectiveness of the bondage. If producer and director don't know what good bondage looks like on woman, then they seldom get the torment part right either, regardless of the thespian skills of the actress.

Granted, there is scant evidence to tell for sure at this point. Heck, the final version of the movie hasn't even been edited. Perhaps, the pictures are publicity stills and not from actual filming. I can only hope that my initial concerns about "Breaking Her Will" are wrong. No one would be happier than I if that were the case.

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 10:37:07 AM

Name: Scheer
Homepage URL:

John Galt. How do you do it? It took me a week to write the Gerard Titsman review and still I missed out important bits (e.g. gags).

Your reviews of the sex and submission sites seem spot on from what I have seen.

I've also subscribed to SocietySM and whilst I'm not a lover of the studio bound consensual type goings on at these places they sometimes offer an intensity that works for me (with a bit of editing). One particular clip from SocietySM stood out though, with Sasha Monet. This clip is describes at the link and is dated 05/25/2005.

Sasha has come to the studio for a bondage photo session and the rigging is to be done by someone not normally seen on camera. Some of the ties are awkward for Sasha and she's not happy. Also she does not like the rigger touching her, anywhere, and voices these feelings. Our regulars, Ogre and The Pope, get fed up with Sasha's protestations and take matters in their own hands. They start to tie her up the way they want and of course bung a ball gag in her mouth to shut her up. Meanwhile, we hear, off camera, the original rigger saying this was not what he'd agreed to and wants no more to do with it, presumably departing. Ogre and The Pope don't care: they continue molesting, tying and photographing Sasha and despite her objections there's nothing she can do about it.

What's unusual about this piece is that it seems very real. Whilst it doesn't go where I want it to go, I watched it two or three times because I couldn't believe it. It's in total contrast to everything else on the site.

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 12:42:32 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Once again, thanks for taking the time to post about the various differences between those websites. Like others here, I have no idea how you find the time to do it, but the information is extremely valuable.

I had no idea Sasha Grey ever did bondage. The first time I ever saw her, she totally rang my bell. So incredibly hot. Looks like she was a one-timer on the site, but it's still pretty exciting to see her tied up and tormented.

Every now and then, we get reviews of websites but since they're not actually movies, we've never put aside a special place on the site to archive those. You guys think that's a good idea? After all, so much of bondage porn is watched and downloaded online rather than the old way of actually buying films to play on their TVs. We've started to open up by allowing reviews of individual clips, so what do you think of having website reviews included alongside the movies? Worth taking the time or not?

I can tell you that if we do that, it won't be anytime soon. At this point, I'm more concerned with finding a way to save what we have now, and I can't even get into Tripod to preserve the pics while this popup issue is blocking everything I do. Meanwhile, a number of you have contacted me via e-mail with more details as to the browsers you are using when the problem occurs, so thanks for that. I haven't heard from Tripod again; I'm hoping we'll have an answer...and hopefully a Monday. We're sort of at their mercy until then. Let's hope they figure out what it is.

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 02:44:11 PM

Name: elkcreek
E-mail address:

Ralphus, I live in MACworld, no disturbing pop ups on Safari or Firefox.

Sorry, I haven't been around much lately. This is my busy season. I barely have time to watch a movie, much less review it. I did order THP-26, the Giga flick I was almost willing to pay $95 for from Japan. Our friend VM got it in, I'm still waiting on it and I will review when it arrives. But this appears to be one of the few GIGA flicks with violence, nudity, and rape. The previews look promising.

One other question. How is Nicheclips to deal with? I signed up there, but in order to download anything I have to prepay by mail. Has anyone watched the Punished Heroines clips? Superior Girls demise looks particularly intriguing. And Raven Alexis looks like the real deal. Is their any other source where a credit card or Paypal is accepted for the PH stuff?

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 04:37:59 PM

Name: John Galt

Scheer: You sent me running back into my archives to look up the Sasha Monet SocietySM shoot. It did seem like Ogre was pushing Sasha in that session. It was especially nice when he accidentally jerked the clamp off her labia and she screamed and cursed loudly. What ruined the effect for me was her laughing all the time. I guess different models react differently, but I prefer screaming and crying to laughing. I'm thinking Sasha Monet was always a bit of a bitch in her videos and she was duly punished for it. Probably worked out ahead of time, but who knows?

Funny you should mention overlooking gags in your review. I am not a big fan of gags myself and I don't really tend to notice whether they are used or not (unless they are overused). It was only after I read Brutus' comment regarding the Titsman site that I went back and mentioned the use of gags in my review of S&S, FUD and F&B. I'll have to remember to note gag use in the future so as to properly enlighten Brutus and other gag aficionados.


pvdadp: I had not seen Elite Pain or Mood. Thanks for linking to them. From what I can tell, they look a lot like the old Insex, which was way too much physical torture and abuse for me. I prefer to inflict pain (or watch pain being inflicted) that does not leave permanent marks or scars. Or even marks that take a week or two to heal. I love watching the female form writhing and struggling in pain, but those whip marks that broke the skin turned me off. Hot wax is okay. Even needle piercing is okay, because it is a small hole and closes up quickly. But watching someone drive a 1/4" (or larger) hook through a breast or labia and then pull it tight stops being exciting for me. Insex is the only porn site I tried but then never went back to visit very much afterwards because the majority of their stuff didn't do it for me. What a wimp, huh?

It sure looked like there were some attractive models on both of those sites, though. I might have to check one of the movies out just to see for myself sometime in the future. They are pretty expensive, though, aren't they?


Thanagar: I saw that new site. I'm not much into public humiliation, though, so I didn't pay too much attention. certainly isn't resting on its laurels, is it? They seem to be trying new things constantly. We just saw the link where Peter was talking to Aria about bondage scenes with non-bondage porn stars. And Device Bondage and The Training of O both push into the realm of extreme pain and humiliation farther than I care much for. Don't you just know the San Francisco Armory must be an incredibly interesting place to work?


Ralphus: Sasha Grey has done several bondage shoots and I have every one of the ones of which I am aware. Her Hogtied shoot is phenomenal, because she endures numerous forced orgasms and when the rigger is ready to give her a break and asks her if she's had enough, she says no, keep going. Oh. My. God. I think she is absolutely hot. She reminds me of Elisha Cuthbert. Woah. Here, let me make your day:

Sasha Grey has done 11 shoots for (not all of which are posted yet) - Sasha Grey at

Sasha Grey has done 2 shoots for Twisted Factory - Sasha Grey at Twisted Factory.

She has done a few more, I think, but I haven't updated my porn database in a year so I can't say for sure. I've been spending all my time watching movies and new porn clips and writing reviews. Heh.

I archive all my posts, so if you decide to start a web site review section I can reformat them for you, grade them, and add dates (which as Scheer pointed out is especially critical given the way sites change). I kind of like reading what is involved in a web site membership. It doesn't usually discourage me if I've decided to check it out anyway (unless it reveals a gross misrepresentation of the advertising), but sometimes I am persuaded to check something out if someone mentions a feature or characteristic of the site that wasn't apparent from my research. I am curious, for instance, about just how realistic or "hard" the Natasha Flade and Centaur Celluloid sites are with regard to rape scenarios and nonconsensual sex scenarios.

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 04:44:52 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

elkcreek: You and Dr. Yuya and others have convinced me I need to start paying attention to the Giga flicks. And I like the cover art for THP-26 (although I'm not sure about the alien sex part). I'm looking forward to your assessment of this one.

Sunday, October 5th 2008 - 05:26:23 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

The clips for New Slave Island 2, along with some clips from Shark 253, are now up on YouTied under the section for Sat., Oct. 4. I will post my review of New Slave Island 2 this evening.

Monday, October 6th 2008 - 12:04:39 AM

Name: Bill Zebub
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

I just got back from a horror convention in Cleveland. Anyway, I'm glad to see some interest (and hope) in "Breaking Her Will."

The movie starts out with Lydia (Jackie Stevens) hitch hiking. She is picked up by Brian (the villain). During the ride, he pulls into a secluded area, brandishes a knife, and gets her to put on the mask and the handcuffs, and he throws her in the trunk. This is an opening montage. Lydia lies on a cold basement floor, and Brian proceeds to abuse the hell out of her, intent on breaking her will and making her his slave.

Have no fear - it is not shot like "Serial Rapist." It's not an art house movie. It's a story-oriented movie, not an image-oriented movie ("Serial Rapist" is an image-oriented movie).

The movie is definitely going to be out this year. It's got some twists, so my hope is that you will be entertained by it. I was talking to people about it at the horror convention and unanimously they were all intrigued. Oh yeah - forgot to mention, the movie also has Kathy Rice. I can trickle some more photos to Ralphus. I have over 200 of them. These are not "stills" from the movie. They are all posed.

Monday, October 6th 2008 - 06:02:31 AM

Name: lovemyzfx
Homepage URL:

It's been a long time since I've written but I've been a regular viewer. Thanks to you guys I'm enjoying the action at Youtied. While searching for bondage / whipping (2 of my favorites) Google pointed me to They have lots of free BSDM videos. Quality all over the board and mostly consensual but it's worth checking out.

I'm more of a DVD guy than Internet viewing so I ordered a few more DVDs from our friend Larry at VM. Including the Travis Lee Productions video. Promise to send a review once I get a chance to view.

Monday, October 6th 2008 - 08:35:26 AM

Name: Sloth
E-mail address:

Mornin All

I seem to be a bit late on all the furor from our possible loss of site material and wish I could be of help but that arena is out of my league.

Ralphus - using Internet Explorer I find the banner links last 10 seconds or so then are overwhelmed by the pop-ups every time. On a better note I had a chance this weekend to view the BATS comp tape from Stakeburner - I had forgotten how good that is - will have to order the second one, on dvd this time. And knowing your affinity on that subject I saw another flick this weekend I had never viewed. In case you haven't seen it there is a 1994 production of "Nostradamus" that contains a very nice albeit short BATS scene - mainstream high dollar production and that is the only reason to see the film.

A Canadian - so looking forward to your New Slave Island review - saw the first one some months ago and was not all that thrilled with it - it was OK by Slave Island standards I thought.

Bill Zebub - it's no secret that on prior efforts I have hammered you pretty hard - I will admit that thus far, at least based on the stills, I am interested in seeing your latest project.

Stay Well All

Monday, October 6th 2008 - 09:25:39 AM

Name: Thanagar

The links are working again, at least with Internet Explorer.

Monday, October 6th 2008 - 11:14:31 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

Here, at last, is my review of New Slave Island 2:

Title: New Slave Island 2

Starring: Hikari Hino, Rina Himekawa, Miina and Riria Himesaki

Directed by: Nagira

Running time: Two hours and 35 minutes

Attackers' New Slave Island 2 might be remembered as the one that returned the dog bowl scenes to Slave Island movies but lost the ball gags (not one gag in the whole thing). New Slave Island 2 is a solid effort -- it has an attractive cast and a number of credible scenes. Unfortunately, the film never quite achieves that old Slave Island greatness and seems to fizzle out toward the end. New Slave Island 2 is worth seeing but probably isn't a keeper.

For anyone new to the Slave Island movies, the premise is that attractive women are captured and taken to an island where they are placed in jail cells and forced to become sex slaves. The focus is on degradation and rape. I didn't entirely follow the plot in this one, but I think it had something to do with two young students who are visiting a spiritual woman at some sort of tropical retreat. All three women are captured and taken to Slave Island, where they are raped and tortured.

First hour

The spiritual woman, Miina, is the first to be captured. A villain sneaks up behind Miina in a garden area and chloroforms her. Miina, dressed in a red kimono, is next seen in a Slave Island cell, where she is chained arms over head and is passed out. Devout ageists like Ralphus may find this hard to believe, but 35-year-old Miina is probably the best looking woman in the film, with a beautiful face and nice, slender body. Anyway, the villain who always wears the white undershirt and blue track pants (Slave Island regulars know who I mean) arrives and decides to violate Miina. As Miina awakens, the villain opens the front of her kimono, so he can fondle and suck on Miina's tits. He also forces some kisses on the terrified Miina.

The villain then goes behind Miina, drops his pants and lifts Miina's kimono, and nails her in a standing position. After a bit, the villain unties Miina and moves her to the floor, where he rapes her in positions like doggie style and missionary. The villain removes Miina's kimono during the rapes and at times has Miina's hands cuffed behind her back. Miina cries in protest in moments that sometimes look wonderfully convincing. The villain briefly chokes Miina as he is raping her and also delivers some punishing slaps to her face.

Back at the tropical retreat, two pretty young students -- Hikari Hino and Rina Himekawa -- are relaxing in a pool. Unfortunately, their R and R is interrupted by two fiends who chloroform the ladies and take them away. When the young students wake up, they are lying in a Slave Island cell, still wearing their bikinis but with their hands cuffed behind their backs. At a nearby wall, pretty, young Riria Himesaki (who was already on Slave Island) is chained arms over head and is being whipped. Meanwhile, spiritual woman Miina is being walked around the cell like a dog.

The action focuses in on one of the students, Rina, a cute woman with a thin body and small, natural breasts. As one villain strips off Rina's bikini bottom and starts licking her pussy, another fiend lifts Rina's bikini top and plays with her tits. One villain then rapes squealing Rina in the missionary position, grabbing Rina's head and kissing her as he rocks her lithe body. Rina, whose hands are still cuffed behind her back, is also raped on her side and in a seated position, and then back to the missionary position, with Rina's body shaking rapidly as she gets drilled.

Rina's young friend, Hikari, has been chained arms over head near a wall. Blue-track-pants villain shows up and starts feeling up Hikari's slender body. The villain adjusts Hikari's bikini top to expose her right breast and he fondles her nipple. The villain unchains Hikari and moves her to the floor, on her back. The villain adjusts the bikini top to expose both of Hikari's enhanced (but OK looking) breasts and proceeds to suck her tits, as sexy Hikari squirms and struggles. Hikari is fairly pretty and her writhing and jerking is quite sexy. The villain removes Hikari's bikini bottom and takes her in positions such as doggie and reverse cowgirl, at one point removing the handcuffs. The rape finishes in a missionary position, with cum seeping out after the guy withdraws.

Rina is briefly violated again in a doggie style position, with her hands cuffed behind her back, and a villain holding her head while another guy rapes her.

Some weird stuff follows. The villains rub some type of plant ointment on the women, which appears to be an aphrodisiac that makes them want to ride floor-mounted dildos.

Second hour

Some villains use a large plastic needle to inject water into Riria's ass. Riria, whose wrists are cuffed behind her back, then kneels in front of a businessman and sucks him to completion, letting some cum dribble out of her mouth afterwards. The businessman slaps Riria's face and the kneeling slave then poops into a bowl (the pooping is heard but not shown).

In another cell, naked students Hikari and Rina are trained to be walked on all fours like dogs, with captors using leashes to make them walk on their hands and knees. Unfortunately there's no whipping here, although Rina's ass is spanked to make her comply.

In one of the movie's best scenes, long and lean Riria Himesaki is bound to a gym mat and gang raped. Riria's wrists and ankles are cuffed to the mat and a chain from the roof is holding her mid-section in the air, so she is bound in a doggie position. As the scene starts, one guy is raping Riria, pulling her hair and slapping her ass, while other men watch. As the violation continues, a second pudgy guy kneels in front of Riria's face and forces Riria to blow him. Soon, the two rapists are replaced by two new guys, who continue the vaginal and oral violations. And on it goes, with one guy occasionally whipping Riria with a flogger as she is being raped. If I counted right, Riria got nailed by six different guys and blew five villains, including a couple of guys who grabbed her head for some serious face fucking. While the sixth guy is porking Riria, a bowl is placed in front of her and Riria is forced to eat like a dog.

Hikari, whose wrists are cuffed behind her back, is visited in a cell by a female villainess who makes the kneeling Hikari suck a floor-mounted dildo and then eat from a dog bowl.

Some forced lesbian follows, as two villains make Hikari and Rina kneel facing each other, with each young woman's wrists tied behind her back. Rina is forced to suck on Hikari's left breast, making Hikari squirm and shudder. Then, Hikari has to suck on whimpering Rina's right breast. Finally, the two young lovelies are forced to kiss in a brief moment that is much too short.

More bizarre stuff: the spiritual woman Miina, who is riding a villain in the reverse cowgirl position, has her wrists freed and is handed her musical instrument (a Japanese shamisen, I believe, which is a three-stringed instrument that resembles a banjo). As she continues to ride the one villain and is forced to blow another, she must also play the shamisen.

Young student Rina, whose hands are cuffed behind her back, is forced to blow a guy. The villain then dinks Rina doggie style and in other positions, including standing. After the guy cums in Rina's pussy, Rina kneels in front of him and licks the final drops off his dick.

Final half hour

Hikari goes through similar motions. She is forced to suck a guy, who then rapes her in various positions -- the best being missionary style, as the villain forces kisses on Hikari's mouth and sucks on her large breasts. The guy cums in Hikari's pussy and then forces Hikari to kneel in front of him and deep throat him.

Students Hikari and Rina are next seen near a wall, with their arms chained over their heads. The spiritual woman Miina is kneeling in front of Rina, licking Rina's pussy, while blue-track-pants villain is using a vibrator on Hikari. Another villain is videotaping the whole thing. Eventually, track-pants villain pushes Miina away from Rina. The villain lifts Rina's right leg and fingers her for the video camera, making Rina cum on his fingers. The villain then rubs Rina's cum in her mouth, as the video camera gets a close up.

As two villains lie on the floor, Hikari and Rina ride them reverse cowgirl style, with each woman's hands cuffed behind her back. The two young women are then forced to kneel in front of two standing businessmen and blow them. Rina's businessman cums in her mouth and Rina then licks his dick clean and thanks him. Meanwhile, Hikari's businessman moves her into a doggie position and fucks her to completion. Hikari then sucks the final drops off that guy's knob and softly thanks him for doing her.

My grade: B+

I have a theory that the best Slave Island movies are a combination of great story, great photography and editing, and star power -- beautiful Japanese porn actresses who can really sell their scenes. Think of stars like Ayumu Kase in Slave Island 7 and Luna Akatsuki in Slave Island 11. In New Slave Island 2, we seem to be dealing with B-Listers -- actresses who are attractive and credible but whose performances are never outstanding. New Slave Island 2 is good and arguably better than most films available today, but it falls a bit short of expectations.

For those who want to know more, I have posted some clips on YouTied. Here are some examples:

Monday, October 6th 2008 - 03:49:47 PM

Name: Bill
E-mail address:

I know of two other movies that I have seen with rape scenes in them. One is called Cry Rape! In it the woman from The Abyss (I forget her name) is raped in her home. The other one is called a Case of Rape. It stars Elizabeth Montgomery as a housewife who attends art classes at a local college at night. She is befriended by a fellow student and he goes home with her for coffee. When he finds she is not going to go to bed with him, he rapes her (off camera). Later in the movie he rapes her again in the parking garage at the college (on camera).

Monday, October 6th 2008 - 08:04:59 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Wow, you really opened up my eyes about Sasha Grey. Like I mentioned before, when I first saw her, I thought she was totally stunning, but I assumed she only did vanilla porn. What a surprise, oh, what a lovely surprise! I did some searching on Google about her and came across a 3-part interview that you can watch online where she talks about being into S&M, and it's intercut with shots of her in heavy bondage positions, including one where she's got dozens of nasty clamps all across her chest and stomach. Hard to believe a girl that beautiful is such a kinky little slut, too. She actually comes across as a very intelligent and down-to-earth young lady, and even came off well when Tyra Banks was grilling her and trying to make her feel ashamed of her career in another interview, which an anti-porn member altered with his own comments and posted on YouTube.

Check it out. It's actually quite interesting to see how the media tries to downgrade porn and associate it with prostitution and the breakdown of society. I think this kind of stuff is entertaining because I like hearing the other side of arguments, even when I totally disagree with them. I even listen to right-wing talk show hosts on the radio, although that's because that's the only thing on in my home state of Ohio.


As Thanagar reported earlier, Tripod has indeed fixed the popup problem that had been plaguing the site that past few days. I've taken this opportunity to add several new additions to the databases, and the reviews will be next.

lovemyzfx: Looking forward to a review of the Travis Lee film. Knowing Travis, I'm sure it will feature lots of whipping.

Speaking of reviews, thanks very much to A Canadian for the latest Slave Island review. In your review, you wrote that three women are captured and taken to Slave Island, where they are raped and tortured. But in reading your review, I didn't hear about much torture other than the enema scene. Looks like more of the same, although those bondage rape clips you posted on YouTied were hot stuff.


Sloth: You mentioned Even though the site hasn't been updated for a while and doesn't reflect it, the burning at the stake compilations are indeed now available on DVD, and they were completed remastered and look great. I would strongly recommend both comps, and if anything, BURN BABY BURN 2 is even better than the first, with some really rare scenes. And BTW, Nostradamus is one of the segments in that second compilation. Anyone who likes to see girls tied to stakes and set on fire will love both collections.


Bill: Thanks for the updates to the Rape Database. When you said the girl from The Abyss were you talking about Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio? The IMDB didn't list her in the credits for a film called "Cry Rape". Can you give us more details?

Monday, October 6th 2008 - 10:09:28 PM

Name: Brutus

John Galt: I'm not sure who's more active: you or Krisi over on YouTied. I guess I prefer comments on whether or not the victim is gagged because after being married for 10 years, I've really come to appreciate a good gag :-) It seems that although we all love seeing Girls in Merciless Peril, there's a huge variety in what exactly turns one's crank. It's pretty tough covering all the bases. For what it's worth, what you are doing so far is fine by me. I also enjoyed the reviews of the websites. I am only familiar with "Sex & Submission," and I think your description was spot on, which brings me to:

Ralphus asked: " what do you think of having website reviews included alongside the movies? Worth taking the time or not?"

I think this would be valuable information to have available on this site. But I don't know if reviews of individual clips would work, since there could be so many of them. Maybe a separate reviews section for websites and their clips? Obviously, the technical problems and the ISP hunt must be taken care of first.

BTW, thanks for the link to the YouTube video. I thought Sasha handled herself pretty well. And I got a chuckle when Tyra asked in a fake naive way, "What's a gang-bang scene?" I probably couldn't watch anymore of that interview. It likely would have pissed me off.

A Canadian: Two and a half hours and no gags? Not even a bit gag? Damn. Anyhow, I prefer torture to rape, so I'm guessing the new Slave Island film probably isn't my cup of tea. Thanks for the review and the heads-up.

Bill Zebub: Well, I gotta say I'm now interested in "Breaking Her Will." I'm glad to hear that it will be a story-oriented feature without all the distracting artsy stuff.

Tuesday, October 7th 2008 - 08:25:39 AM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: Well, I am glad to have rocked your world with the Sasha Grey information. It is the least I can do for the webmaster of The Best Forum Ever. I had seen the Tyra banks interview, but I forgot all about it since, unlike Brutus, I made the mistake of watching the whole thing and it did in fact piss me off. Tyra Banks is such a smug, self-important, sanctimonious cunt. Sasha acquitted herself famously, though.

I never thought about reviewing the clips on sites like S&S, FUD and F&B like the Powershotz clips to tell the truth. However, as I think about it, the ones that have role-playing scenarios might be interesting, since they kind of tell a story. I'm thinking if they are individually available, whether as DVDs or downloadable clips, it might be viable since readers could pick and choose. But having to pay for a membership is different. Of course, that's just my own personal distinction.

Brutus: I would have to say Krisi has me beat with his (or her?) voluminous number of YouTied posts. Holy cow talk about a video clip library!

A Canadian: I am struggling to decide whether or not I would like the Slave Island videos. My fear is that, personally, I will find them too repetitious. One of the reasons I don't watch traditional porn much is that it reached a point where there was the thinnest of plot lines that simply served to set up sex, which then went on and on and on. I wasn't excited by just watching the in-and-out motion, despite sometimes innovative and inventive positions and frequently attractive females. Plus, it was monotonous listening to "oh god" and "uhh uhh uhh" and "oh yeah baby fuck me" and "mmm" and detecting not a shred of authenticity in the activity.

The advantage of mainstream movies with torture, sex, or rape scenes is that they featured performers who could usually act, and they employed dramatic techniques to build suspense or anticipation, and generally built to a climactic moment. The disadvantage, of course, is that the climactic moment happened a few seconds after the scene ended on screen or happened off screen. Or if there was a pay-off on-screen, it was limited to an R-rating and it was far too brief. And usually featured a body double.

The Slave Island clips I've seen (that you have been so considerate as to post on YouTied) indicate that the women are attractive, but there's a monotony of reaction. Just a constant crying while interchangeable men move from hole to hole and cycle through, basically doing the same thing over and over. The scenes don't seem to build to any climax of any sort. Not even the traditional climax of male ejaculation, since there are so many guys and they are always coming separately all over the place. There doesn't seem to be an imminent threat of any sort to the women. Rape is a given. They just get raped, and then get raped again, and then, you know, get raped again. Even if the girls are good enough performers to sell being brutally raped, even a real rape victim probably would become desensitized and unresponsive after the third or fourth guy did her. And repeated abuse would surely lose its edge.

That is also why I am a bit ambivalent about the new Bill Zebub movie. It sounds kind of like a long, monotonous degradation procedural. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I appreciate a beautiful woman being stripped and tortured and raped as much as the next perv. I just crave build-up and climax.

I like the Powershotz clips because, as I've indicated, the amateur models often seem to be feeling what is being done to them. My favorite clips from the web sites I've mentioned previously are the ones where the performer is actually in the scene, experiencing the moment, feeling pain or discomfort and actually achieving orgasm after a great teasing build-up. It doesn't happen near enough, but it does happen occasionally. And as jaded as I am, I can usually tell if it was real (and if it wasn't and I was fooled, then she did a great job of faking it and that counts).

Am I missing something in the Slave Island videos? Is there a sense of imminent threat? Do you feel any building anticipation leading to a climax? Are you invested in any of the victims, or even in any of the tormentors? Are there any of the Slave Island videos you've seen that do more of what I am describing? Because if so, I'm thinking it would rate maximum awesomeness.

I do like your reviews, though. They are very detailed and thorough, and without them I wouldn't have a clue what questions to ask, or a resident expert to whom to address them. Thanks and keep up the great work!

Tuesday, October 7th 2008 - 05:12:34 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

Ralphus, Brutus and John Galt: Thanks for the feedback on the review. I thought it was interesting Ralphus mentioned my reference to "torture," as I thought that might come up. Indeed, before I posted, I debated in my mind whether I should keep that sentence in the review. Ultimately, I decided some scenes would meet the test in a broad definition of torture -- the occasional floggings during the gang rape scene, the vibrator used on the woman chained AOH, and yes, the scenes where women are forced to eat dog food. I wish the "torture," such as it is, was better -- I would like to see the kind of whippings that were included in Slave Island 7. But that kind of stuff seems to have disappeared from the more recent movies. Still, I thought it would be OK to make one reference to torture, as that's supposed to be part of the theme.

As for John Galt's questions, I'll try to answer as best I can and then invite others to join in, as many of us have seen the Slave Island movies.

In my view, the best of the Slave Island movies don't necessarily feel repetitive, even though some scenes are repeated, because there is a nice variety in the types of scenes offered and the best movies have a great pace to them. That's not true for all of them, though. Some Slave Island movies can feel repetitive and I think New Slave Island 2 is probably in that category.

The movies don't have a sense of imminent threat, as the women tend to be captured early and put through their paces early. But in the best of the titles, you do empathize with lead star (and sometimes the supporting victims) as you see her will being broken. Indeed, that's the real strength of the Slave Island films. In the best of the titles, the lead heroine puts up quite a fight in the beginning, but you watch (sometimes for more than three hours) as the villains break her spirit and turn her into a sex slave.

I'm biased, but I think everyone should try at least one Slave Island movie. If you want to start at the top, the best title in my view is Slave Island 11. Other strong titles include Slave Island 7, Slave Island 5, Slave Island 8 and Slave Island 12.


One side note: New Slave Island 2 clearly has its fans. It is at the top of the list in the Attackers listing of bestselling movies.

One other side note: I'm not sure if this was clear when I posted my review, but there are more New Slave Island 2 clips on YouTied than the ones I linked to in my review. If you check the YouTied postings for Saturday, Oct. 4, you'll see I actually provided 11 clips from New Slave Island 2.

Tuesday, October 7th 2008 - 06:36:28 PM

Name: Scheer
Homepage URL:

Site Reviews: I like the idea of site reviews.

There are already some good sources of porn reviews, one at the link, one here:

The big benefit for having reviews here are that they would be done with our own slant on the material. These porn reviewers do not always know what we here appreciate.

Unfortunately there are also negatives, the main one being the increase in workload on our already hard working moderator.

The idea could be extended to sources of DVDs, Video on Demand etc. I've often seen posts asking if anyone has bought from here or there.

I like to make work for others!

Wednesday, October 8th 2008 - 02:19:23 AM

Name: Sloth
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Mornin All

A Canadian - thanks so much for the "New Slave Island 2" review - pretty much landing with Brutus on this one as a bit too light on the torture end but those are very nice models they used.

BigD - hey, thanks for that heads up on "Red Ridge" - certainly sounds Gimp worthy - and they break her toes you say - ouch - for those interested the home page has a trailer and some nice production stills at the above link - when I view it I'll leave a comment.

Stay Well All

Wednesday, October 8th 2008 - 06:22:18 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

BigD and Sloth: Thanks for the additional info on Red Ridge. You're right, definitely looks worth a rental. What's interesting is that if you check out the production stills, there's also photos of an attractive brunette with her hands tied behind her and gagged with duct tape, with her neck in a noose about to be hung! Probably a big tease, but still pretty exciting. There's also a nice still of the same gagged woman about to be hung in the behind the scenes section.

I added a couple of choice clips to YouTied today, the excellent mainstream torture scene from Executive Power and the classic bondage rape scene from Femmes de Sade, starring A Canadian's girlfriend Abigail Clayton.

Wednesday, October 8th 2008 - 04:17:04 PM

Name: A Canadian

It looks like YouTied is down again. At least, I couldn't get into the site this morning. When YouTied returns, GIMPers will definitely want to check those clips Ralphus posted on Wednesday.

Thursday, October 9th 2008 - 03:21:22 AM

Name: Mad Max
E-mail address:

Regarding today's daily picture:

That's a talented artist!

Thursday, October 9th 2008 - 04:37:10 AM

Name: Tom Roper
E-mail address:

Yep, YouTied is down again. Poo! There have been a lot of good posts lately. If I can ever figure out a way to convert all my RealPlayer files to postable media files, I can put a lot more on than I have already. Unfortunately most of mine are RP and I cannot figure out how to get them converted.

Thursday, October 9th 2008 - 07:33:03 AM

Name: Ironman
E-mail address:

And a fine booty she is. Lash her to the wheel and belay the hatch behind you, lads.

Thursday, October 9th 2008 - 11:13:32 AM

Name: Bill
E-mail address:

I was mistaken about the woman in the movie Cry Rape. It wasn't the one from the Abyss, but a woman named Andrea Marcovicci. In the opening scene of the movie, she has just taken a shower and as she comes out, she is grabbed by the rapist who threatens her with a knife. He then cuts he bathroom down the back and rapes her from behind with her laying on her couch. She identifies the wrong man as her rapist and the movie continues around his trying to say it wasn't him till the rapist strikes again using the same method, but is caught this time.

Thursday, October 9th 2008 - 07:30:35 PM

Name: zee-ef-ex
Homepage URL:

Review: Sex & Submission's Jail or Slavery

Rating: Mixed. A for visuals and storyline. B- for execution.

How you react to this DVD will depend on whether you like coercion, how rough you like the BDSM, and if you think Morgan March is a hottie. I do, so this movie gets upped in the ratings based just on her appearance.

Imagine my surprise when I saw my local video store was carrying a Sex & Submission DVD. And starring Morgan March. She's so cute I would be fascinated watching an hour of her just reading a book.

The movie starts really slow, taking about 25 minutes just to do the setup. Basic plotline, Morgan March is a secretary in a shipping company. She dresses super slutty. Her male co-workers can't keep their hands off her, groping her and pestering her for dates. (This company apparently has never heard of sexual harassment). Her female co-workers despise her for all the attention the males give her.

Unbeknownst to anyone, she has been quietly making extra dollars by shipping illegal drugs through the company. One morning she comes in early to package up some coke in a shipping box and mail it. The boss happens to be checking the surveillance tapes that day and sees this activity from that morning. He locates the box she prepped, which hasn't gone out yet. Busted! At the end of the day when everyone is gone he calls her into his office and gives her a choice - either he calls the cops and she goes to jail, or she gets out of it by being his sex slave. She reluctantly agrees to be his sex slave.

The movie visually is filmed and lit very nicely, so that's a plus. Another plus is that Morgan March gives good pout. She frequently objects and is coerced again and again into continuing the game.

First action scene (finally) he has her disrobe, stretch, spread her ass cheeks. Then he ties her with black tape sitting in a chair with her legs pulled up. I think he gives her a little vibrator action, I can't remember, or maybe it was cunnilingus. He does that to her a lot in this movie - the fact that there is some sexual conduct is another plus for me.

Another couple of scenes in the office. One, she is tied standing up in front of a bookcase. The other, she is tied flat on her back on a table. The movie is disjointed in that it doesn't always show the tying, which is a shame. But when it does show it, that works well.

Then he smuggles her into his apartment. She's tied up and half naked and he has her jump like a bunny rabbit into his place. Morgan has very tiny tits (one of the things I like about her, I love a tight, taut woman's body) so even though there's little bouncing from her jumping she still looks cute and humiliated doing it.

He plays with her on the couch for a while as she is tied up and ball gagged while they watch a porno. Then he spanks her. At one point he asks her if she likes sex soft or rough, and she quietly admits she likes it rough. (As noted, she sells coerced poutiness well).

Next scene is the best scene. He takes into the bedroom and ties her spreadeagle on the bed. He eats her out for a while, then loosens his pants and climbs on top of her and implies fucking her really, really hard. I say "implies" because it's shot from the back and you see no actual insertion or contact. Still, the scene is sexy.

And then ... the movie ends - wait for Part II! Just as it was getting good. I have seen clips from Part II on the web and they look more hardcore, so I doubt my local video store will carry it. But if anyone ever does see Part II, it would be interesting to read your follow-up review to mine.

Morgan March looks great tied up. On that basis alone, most of this movie was a winner for me. And I love psychological head games so the wavering coercion that she sold so well worked for me. Add that the visual quality of the movie was attractive, fetishy, bright, etc all add up to pluses.

The minuses were wasting so much time drawing out the setup and the movie itself (to purposely create a need for a Part II?) and the fact that this was pretty tame for a Sex & Submission movie. I expect Part II would be a lot less tame.

So an A- rating if you like Morgan. Much less than that for the way the movie was executed.


Thursday, October 9th 2008 - 09:44:38 PM

Name: A Canadian

zee-ef-ex: Excellent and entertaining review. I enjoy scenes of forced humiliation so I think Sex and Submission's Jail or Slavery is right up my alley. Unfortunately, finding a movie like this can be just as difficult in my neighborhood and I don't know that I'll have your good luck. But I'll certainly look for it.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 03:15:29 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

YouTied is back up.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 03:22:37 AM

Name: lovemyzfx
Homepage URL:

As promised - Review of Travis Lee productions: Stolen Money / Dreams of Reality

Since an overall view of the storyline can be found on the Video Mayhem website I wont spend the time recapping I'll just give you my impressions. The good points:

(1) It's only 12 bucks from VM and it's about 2 hours long

(2) There are some nice tied scenes, ball gags, full nudity, clothespins on nipples and pussy

(3) If you're into girl on girl action there is some of that in the first movie - not my thing unless they are dealing out some pain and they're not

The not so good:

(1) This has a home movie feel to it. The sound is poor and there is a constant hum in the background, more noticeable in the first movie. The image quality is like 2nd generation VHS. I don't mind home movies if the action is REAL - this obviously is not which brings me to..:

(2) Like ZFX, the whips and such are fake and though the actresses do their best to sell it- nice screams and such, it is so fake it fails to arouse. There is one brief scene in movie 2 where he uses battery cables on her tits but there are no sound effects and no sparks - just doesn't work.

(3) The actions of the male in the first movie are simply ridiculous and don't fit the thin plot line. He treats his captive more like a lesbian dom gently teasing her captive. He uses one of those sticks with a tiny piece of leather on it and taps at her like he's teasing her. Are you kidding me? You're trying to torture this bitch to get your money back not arouse her!

(4) There are long periods when nothing happens. Shots of the girls tied up but no action.

Final verdict - didn't do anything for me. Maybe I'm jaded from the Japanese movies VM provides or the excellent work of ZFX in SOB4, Ballista 2, etc but this is not a keeper for me. My grade is a C at best.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 05:57:56 AM

Name: John Galt

I recently picked up a 10-DVD set of hardcore horror movies from Something Weird Video. Most of the DVDs contain two movies. They all look to be 70's vintage. My expectations were realistically low. However, the premises of some of the movies sounded promising, so I decided to see if indeed any of them were worth watching. You never know when you might discover a GIMP gem hidden away in the trash.

So I will be reviewing the DVDs, which may be one or two movies. I'm not expecting great things, but it is always helpful to know the stuff to avoid as well as the stuff to watch. This is a review of Something Weird Video's Sexy Shocker Hardcore Horrors Volume 9, which features two "Classic Adult" XXX movies, Sex Seance and Horror Whore.

Sex Seance (AKA House of de Sade) (1977)

You would think a XXX movie about a group of swingers who went to an old haunted house and summoned the spirit of the Marquis de Sade in a seance would make for some good GIMP. Well, if the name of that movie turns out to be Sex Seance, you would be wrong.

Sex Seance stars Vanessa del Rio and several other unattractive performers. They all have 70s pubic and facial hair, and 70s clothes on the rare occasions when they are dressed. Every day I thank god there are so few pictures of me from the 70s because I probably dressed like this as well.

As far as GIMP-like scenes go, there are surprisingly few. There is a scene where Vanessa del Rio and her boyfriend are having sex where he fastens a large black leather collar around her neck that has a chain attached. He kind of pulls her around by the chain, making her crawl on all fours. He half-heartedly spanks her. Then he fucks her with a cucumber. But that's not the weird part. The weird part is when he takes the vegetable peeler and peels the end of the cucumber while it is sticking out of her vagina. Then he takes a knife and cuts several slices off the end and feeds her the pieces. If this was the Vegetables in Merciless Peril forum, this would get a high score. What a stupid scene.

When they finally get to the house and summon the spirit of the Marquis de Sade (I am skipping all the random 70s style sex), the spirit grabs Vanessa del Rio and spirits (HAhahahaha) her away to a room where she struggles unconvincingly and says inane things ("Oh, pain! Pain!") while she is weakly whacked with what looks and sounds like one of those cardboard tubes you are left with when you use up your roll of paper towels, and a flogger, and she is spanked. Oh yeah, they also attach nipple clamps to her big floppy breasts and rubbery nipples. It is a pathetic scene, and this de Sade needs to turn in his BDSM membership card if that's the best he can do.

The others decide to "split up" and go looking for her and they all end up in a lame orgy together when the movie abruptly ends. I'm thinking the original VHS video tape broke at this point during the transfer and they decided it was close enough to the end to just move on.

The video quality sucks. The sound quality sucks. There are obvious scene jumps that were either sloppy editing originally or sloppy editing by Something Weird Video. There is nothing of interest here. No bondage to speak of. No torture. No gags. Lame whipping. I firmly believe that any movie that dares to feature the Marquis de Sade and fails to produce at least one good GIMP scene deserves an F. This movie gets an F-.

Horror Whore (AKA Hardgore, Hard Gore and Sadoasylum) (1974)

The second feature on this DVD is Horror Whore, which was titled Hard Gore the first time I saw it years ago. The VHS copy I originally watched was poor quality, so I thought I might be able to get a better feel for the movie from this DVD. Unfortunately, I think the folks at Something Weird Video used that same copy for this DVD transfer, so no joy.

Once again, the set up sounds promising. A nymphomaniac with masochistic tendencies is checked into a sanitarium run by devil worshipers who have brutal orgies and conduct human sacrifices. Does that sound like it could be great? And it is XXX as well. Even better? You think? Prepare to be discouraged.

Maria, the masochistic nymphomaniac, checks in. There is random lesbian sex, random masturbation, and random heterosexual sex throughout, none of it particularly appealing. None of these performers are attractive. The women are all on the chunky side, and Maria kind of pancakes out when she lays on her back. And I don't mean just her breasts pancake out. The only person I recognized in the entire cast was "John Seeman," who was a fixture in a LOT of bad 70s porn flicks.

So Maria wakes up in the night and finds her nurse dead. She runs screaming naked down the hall until she is grabbed by an orderly. Next thing, she's on her back on a bed or an altar or something being felt up by two girls while she's sucking off two guys. One guy's cock is cut off with a knife while she's sucking it. Yuck and ouch, not necessarily in that order.

She wakes up the next morning and the doctor tells her she had a bad dream. He prescribes vibrator therapy and she and naked nurse Lucy get down with that until a mysterious hand cranks up the dial on the electrical box the vibrator is wired into and it starts smoking. In Nurse Lucy's snatch. And she can't seem to pull it out. There is lame exclamatory dialog. ("Oh! Call the doctor! Call the fire department!") You can't see me but I am rolling my eyes.

That night, masochistic nymphomaniac Maria hears noises. She investigates. She sees Lucy drink from the "magic grail," then fellate a guy wearing a devil mask that looks like a tomato, complete with a leafy green collar. Lucy sucks him off and he blows a massive amount of semen onto her face. And when I say a massive amount, I am talking about a ZFX fake penis gushing amount. Then, as a reward, the devil mask guy tells Lucy she gets to experience the "ultimate orgasm" and she walks over to a guillotine. She bends over at the waist and puts her head into the stock, which is closed over the back of her neck. Another guy in a mask starts to fuck her from behind until he gets his steam up, then he releases the blade and it slices down and cuts her head off and he comes all over her butt, which is unaccountably still standing up. That sounds like it might have been a GIMP-worthy scene, but it just didn't play right. There was no suspense. There was no fear or panic from the girl. There was no real build-up. There wasn't even much of a climax.

Maria wakes up the next day, with cloth restraints around her wrists keeping her in bed. She is sedated. She wakes up that night, no longer restrained, and sneaks out and overhears the doctor planning to kill her in some spectacular way. She makes a noise and they catch her and take her to "The Room," where we see all the dead nurses. Maria briefly struggles but then gets it on with the doctor. The other guy fucks a corpse while humming a happy tune. I am not even trying to make sense of this any more.

After the doctor finishes with Maria, he ties her AOH in "The Room," and we are subjected to some bizarre imagery, including a talking penis (with a surprisingly deep voice), a Jesus penis, the tomato headed devil mask blowing smoke from one of its nostrils, and three rocket-powered penis dildo things hanging by visible wires with sparkler flames shooting out their, umm, asses I guess. The camera moves to suggest they sort of fly around but really they are just hanging there, eventually losing their sparkles, while Maria ducks her head like they are swooping down on her or something. Then they start squirting semen onto Maria. Like, gallons of semen. More in this one scene than Rick Masters uses in an entire movie.

Maria wakes up the next day and she's given an aphrodisiac (an inspired treatment for a nymphomaniac) and maybe a sedative but the sound is so muddy I couldn't make it out. She pours the drink into the toilet and then sits on the toilet and pees and then wipes herself and flushes the toilet. The filmmaker keeping it real, I guess.

Next thing we know, we are in the thick of yet another orgy. Maria is sucking off the tomato headed devil mask guy. When she's done, he invites her to experience the "ultimate orgasm" of the guillotine, but since she is not drugged, she grabs a huge battle ax and kills the devil mask guy and, I think, the corpse fucker, before she is beaten to death. The scene fades with Maria dead, a lighted curved candle sticking out of her pussy.

The sound quality on this transfer is abysmal. The video quality is little better. I didn't expect an award-winning storyline or even decent acting, but I was kind of hoping for some GIMP seeing as how we had a masochistic nymphomaniac at the mercy of a bunch of devil worshiping human sacrifice weirdos in a XXX movie. It completely and utterly fails on all levels. Bondage almost nonexistent. No gags that I recall. No torture. And a beheading sex scene that could have been awesome in the hands of a True Pervert but totally flops here. I wonder what the filmmaker was going for when he made this movie? It is a mystery to me. This is an F.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 06:33:59 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Bill: Thanks for the updates for the Rape Database. I added descriptions to both films to the database. Every bit of information is helpful.


zee-ef-ex: Wow, it's been a while since we've gotten an actual review from you, thanks. When was that, back when you reviewed The Apartment? I always like reading what you have to say so I hope we'll be reading more in the future.

I didn't know that Sex and Submission put out DVDs; that's news to me. Unfortunately, it looks like they're not bold enough to release bondage and actual penetration to the DVD market; that type of material I guess will have to still be for their paying members. Still, sounds like a good way to introduce their wares to a different audience. They'll probably pick up some new members that way.

Added to the Reviews section at this URL:


lovemyzfx: I might have seen the Travis Lee films you reviewed. I'm pretty sure one of those is the movie I've mentioned a few times that had Bitter Sweet Persuasion's Suzi Sexton in the lead role, made a year before BSP and also filmed at the Lickety Split adult bookstore. Except that Suzi was covered in tattoos so I mostly just fast-forwarded through it because of that.

Travis is a good guy and he obviously worked with the best since Rick Masters used him in dozens of ZFX movies. You have to admire him for wanting to make his own bondage films, but very few people can match the level of Rick's work, even if you're using the same actress in the same location.

Added to the Reviews section here:

And congratulations for making the Reviews section for the first time. You join a growing number of others who have had their reviews showcased for posterity.


John Galt: Thanks for sharing your hilarious comments of those two movies with the rest of us. If Mystery Science Theater ever tackled adult films, those sound like great candidates. "F-"? I'm pretty sure that's as bad as it gets. You have to be careful with Something Weird Video. They'll sell anything, no matter how crappy. But every now and then, some good stuff turns up. Did you see the clip from The Kiss of Her Flesh? They cut out the whole "tortured with lobster claws" part (seriously!) but the electro scene is fun. I have it in my collection.

The URL to your latest review is in my Homepage URL. And last night and today I finally got caught up in updating the Reviews section. There were quite a few to add, so check out the section to find your respective reviews. And thanks again to everyone for all the hard work they took in sharing with the forum.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 01:32:18 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Those reviews were definitely amusing. I can safely predict I won't be looking for those titles anytime soon. I hope you found at least one gem in the movies you bought, as there seem to be plenty of those Something Weird Videos in one of my local stores and I would love to know about one worth buying.

I should add that I never really got Vanessa del Rio. She had quite a following but never did much for me.


lovemyzfx: Thanks for the review of Stolen Money / Dreams of Reality. It sounds like our friend Travis will be best remembered for his work in front of the camera.


Those of you who have been following the "human rights" censorship issues in my country might be interested to know the British Columbia case against writer Mark Steyn and Maclean's magazine was dismissed.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 03:53:15 PM

Name: JoeX


Jail or Slavery appears to be from SocietySM, not from Sex and Submission.

It looks interesting, though. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.

Joe X

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 06:58:27 PM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

Vanessa del Rio and several other unattractive performers

Hey, now, I liked Vanessa. She was no Angel Kelly, but she was a hearty slut who loved to fuck (and still does, I think). The scene of her in Devil in Ms Jones 2 getting covered in cum: Pure deliciousness. But I digress.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 07:10:22 PM

Name: John Galt

JoeX: Ah-HAH. So that's why I couldn't find it. Sure enough, it is from Dungeon Corp and Jail or Slavery Part 2 is already available.

Morgan March and didn't really hit it off. In 2004 she did a shoot for Hogtied where she missed the first scheduled shoot and was late for the second one and apparently had no idea Hogtied did hard bondage and cut the shoot short. There's a pretty snarky description of the shoot and Morgan March on the site. So I was kind of surprised when I read she might have done a Sex and Submission shoot.

It appears she got over her initial apprehension about bondage, though. She has been a fairly regular model on the Dungeon Corp sites. She did 9 shoots for SocietySM, 2 shoots for FuckingDungeon, 11 shoots for PerfectSlave, 3 shoots for Cumbots, 1 shoot for SmotheredSlave, and 2 shoots for StrictRestraint. But she hasn't been back to

She sure is a cutie, though. Personally, I would be more likely to join SocietySM for a month and download all of her shoots (that I don't already have), since the Jail or Slavery DVDs are taken from two SocietySM updates. More cost effective.


jhlipton: Vanessa del Rio never did anything for me, even back in her heyday. Of course, a lot of the classic porn performers didn't do much for me, so that doesn't mean anything except I am harder to please maybe. Or I'm some kind of porn snob. But no offense intended to those who like her.


Now this is kind of interesting. Whenever I find some obscure old adult movie, I try to look it up on the Internet Movie Database (IMDB) and I never can find it. I look under the title, I look under the performers, I even check out alternate titles if I know them. No hits. But when I google for the movie, one of the first hits is usually IMDB. I'm thinking that IMDB needs to use Google as its search engine because the one they are using sucks big time.

So it was with this movie. I came across it at Bizarro Video, where it is available as a download to members or as a DVD for $17.95. I would link to the DVD page, but Bizarro Video doesn't work like that. It is in the Grindhouse XXX pages. It is also available from Alpha Blue Archives as part of The Roughies: Brute Lust, a collection of 12 full-length "uncut" DVD movies for $129.95.


The Abduction of Lorelei (1977)

The Abduction of Lorelei is a XXX grindhouse flick starring Serena (using the name Jenn Gillian, for some reason) and John Galt (not me and no relation). It involves the abduction of Lorelei and her subsequent ransoming. Serena was known for doing some rough stuff, so I thought maybe this might be worthwhile.

The movie begins with Serena shopping. She gets kidnapped pretty quickly. See, she pulls up her car into the middle of a deserted parking lot and doesn't think it's strange when a big white step van and a Ford Mustang each pull up on each side of her, even though there are empty parking spaces for, like, miles around. She gets out of her car and is grabbed by two guys, who manhandle her into the van. One of the kidnapper guys looks like Barry Gibb back in the day, by the way.

Serena puts up a pretty good fight. Her wrists are bound in front of her using rope and while one guy (the one who looks like Barry Gibb) drives the van back to "the hideout," the other guy tears at her clothes and pretty much exposes her and fingers her and eats her out and makes her suck him off except it looks a lot like XXX inserts instead of the Real Thing. I don't get it. Serena is an adult performer so why would she not do her own sex scene close-ups? Maybe they added them in post-production. The rape scene in the van is not satisfying. Serena is kind of fighting but not really. The guy rolls her body into strange contorted positions so her can lick her pussy from innovative angles. It was sort of like they were just trying to do things you don't normally see and frankly would never normally care to do.

They get to the hideout and the kidnappers (two guys and a girl) wrestle Serena into the house and onto the bed. She halfway fights them as they do it, but with her hands tied in front of her like that she could have been whacking the hell out of them. And even though one person each took one leg, she could have kicked the shit out of them as well. I guess maybe she didn't want them to drop her.

They toss her on the bed and tie her ankles together and then raise her feet up into the air over her head and take ransom Polaroid pictures of her with her sex exposed. (Polaroids are what people did for dirty pictures before digital cameras.) The kidnappers even kind of pose with her and her sex, which if you are taking notes about doing your own abduction is not a great idea. They also push an empty Dr Pepper bottle into her vagina and take pictures of that. I'll bet Dr Pepper did not pay for that product placement.

They leave her tied up on the bed, her hands tied in front of her, and she stays there. Okay, you know, use your teeth to help untie the hand ropes and use your hands, even if they are still tied together, to undo your feet bonds. That's like the first thing you learn in Hostage Escape 101. So minus points for that oversight. Her arms should have been pulled over her head and tied to the top of the bed and her feet should have been pulled to the foot of the bed and bound there. But no. A potentially good bondage scene ruined.

The girl kidnapper returns to clean her up and promptly unties her hands and feet and goes down on her and before you know it we have "69" (the position, not the year) lesbian sex going on.

Next scene of significance, we see Serena sitting at the kitchen table being fed soup by the girl kidnapper because her hands are still tied in front of her. You know, she could feed herself even with her hands tied like that. Eventually, the girl kidnapper unties her hands. Then they have more lesbian sex, with Serena as a fully willing participant. The Stockholm Syndrome doesn't usually work quite this quickly.

The kidnappers get their money and celebrate and everyone drinks a lot and falls asleep except for Barry Gibb. He goes to Serena's room, where she is sleeping naked on top of the bedspread, untied, just a few feet away from a sliding glass door through which she could have fled while all the drinking was going on. He wakes her and takes hold of her ankles and pulls her feet up and apart and moves up between her legs and she struggles and I had forgotten how hot Serena could look with her long slender legs up in the air and wide apart. She struggles. The other guy kidnapper awakens from his drunken stupor and follows the sounds of screaming to the room and pulls Barry Gibb off of Serena before he gets too far. A fight ensues. Barry Gibb is shot and dies.

Serena wraps her lithe naked body around the guy who did the shooting and as a reward she pulls him to the bed and commiserates with him and says it'll be okay and then they fuck like bunnies. First in missionary, then he rolls her over and attempts penetration from the rear, but he is too limp so Serena sucks his cock for a while to restore some wood and then she straddles him and manages to get him inside of her. He finally gets her bent over on her knees and does her doggie style, although he still looks pretty limp to me. This scene has no violence or bondage or even any heat for that matter. Still, Serena graciously makes noises like she actually feels him.

Afterwards, he gets up and lights up a cigarette and Serena picks up the gun sitting on the nightstand and shoots him. She gets dressed, drives the Mustang out past a Shakey's Pizza Parlor to the Holiday Inn and picks up the girl kidnapper, who has the briefcase full of money and they do a Meaningful Lesbian Kiss With Fully Extended Tongue in silhouette to let us know it's True Love. The end.

So a not-completely-lame kidnapping scene, and a not-completely-lame rape scene, but bondage that wouldn't hold anyone. No gags. Lots of ho-hum sex, mostly of the lesbian variety. Not that there's anything wrong with that. And Serena really was pretty hot. So I'm going to be nice and give this a D+.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 08:28:19 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

JoeX: Good catch on that Sex and Submission error. I thought it seemed odd that they were suddenly putting out DVDs for the public. Not that I think that's a bad idea, but if they have to censor the sex it would kind of go against the theme of their site. I corrected the company name on the Reviews main page; zee-ef-ex can let me know if he wants me to change the references to Sex and Submission in the actual review.

John Galt: Thanks, the link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.

I've seen The Abduction of Lorelei and actually took about 15 minutes from it in my highlights tape, but that was mainly just the abduction and the following scene on the bed culminating with the Dr Pepper bottle in the snatch pics. I liked the humiliation and the degrading dialogue, but you're right, after that, there really wasn't much of anything there. Kind of a disappointment since Serena was one of the more attractive and kinkier performers of the era, but I thought it was a worthwhile buy at the time.

I've been thinking, could it be that a lot of the so-called "classics" of the Golden Age of porn from the 1970s and 80s weren't really all that great looking back? Certainly they had more freedom back then, but they definitely didn't have the truly beautiful women that are into porn these days. People like Marilyn Chambers, Georgina Spelvin and Linda Lovelace were considered superstars back then and I doubt many of them would even be employable if they were just starting their careers today. I would love to use a time machine and whisk someone like Sasha Grey back to the 1970s and have them make these films over again. I have the feeling they would stand up better to the test of time, especially the rape scenes. It all goes back to the question: Are there any truly great adult films with GIMP themes out there?

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 10:04:19 PM

Name: Falstaff

Great sex stars of the Golden Age that would hold up today? How about Annette Haven and Serena, both together with Jamie Gillis in an adult remake of Dracula - it was released in two versions, one with the hardcore sex, and very little blood, the other with all the blood and lots of nudity but very little actual sex. I also think Constance Money would hold up pretty well against today's actresses.

However, Ralphus, I agree with you, Linda Lovelace, and some of the others of the era leave something to be desired. However, Marilyn Chambers, in her early films was IMO, something to behold. But of all the starlets from that era, Annette Haven was in a class all by herself.

The other important thing to note about the early starlets of the Porn Age - most were natural, and not "enhanced" to ridiculous proportions - only my opinion, but there definitely can be "too much" of a good thing. On a slightly different level, comparing eras, the old Cole Whitman, HOM releases were in a class by themselves. The only thing that comes close are the ZFX releases of Rick.

Considering when the old HOM were done, it is amazing what they accomplished - and for the time - they had really attractive girls in their movies. Everything considered, I still think the "best" of the oldies were outstanding, comparable to anything done today.

Friday, October 10th 2008 - 11:34:12 PM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: Talk about eerie. I almost went off into a disquisition on the relative unattractiveness of early porn stars as opposed to today during each of my last two reviews, but I doggedly stayed on topic instead. Linda Lovelace was the first "name" that occurred to me as a porn superstar who never appealed much to me personally.

Marilyn Chambers, as Falstaff mentioned, was pretty hot in her earlier movies, though. Which brings to mind Behind the Green Door, which as I recall was one of the first adult flicks with a sort-of nonconsensual sex and bondage theme I ever saw, if not the first one. I haven't seen it in years, but as I think back now I don't remember any blatant nonconsensual sex or even bondage. Memories are funny.

Annette Haven was pretty hot, but I didn't see a whole lot of movies with her in them, so she didn't really register for me. According to Wikipedia, she specifically avoided bondage movies, which might explain why she ended up on the periphery of my XXX actress radar. (Although that article did mention that she did some "fetish" videos with dominatrix Kim Wylde in the mid-90s so I wonder what that was about. Hmm.)

While I was in Wikipedia, I decided to see what information they had on early porn stars and came across a List of female porn stars by decade. I have to say, out of the 29 actresses listed for the 70s, there were only 3 (Desiree Cousteau, Kandy Barbour, Marilyn Chambers) that I looked for in movies. Seka was borderline. I unaccountably missed out on seeing The Opening of Misty Beethoven when it showed, so Constance Money was never a draw for me. She did so few XXX features that never saw her, until the GIMP banner showing her bound spreadeagled. Dang.

Oddly, the list placed Serena in the 80s, although I am pretty sure she had some 70's stuff. When I think of XXX performer "generations," I think more in terms of movie-versus-video than decades. The video generation was more to my liking. During the 80s I was obsessed with Ginger Lynn and was so disappointed she never did any bondage stuff. During the 90s it was mostly Shayla LaVeaux and I was so happy she did do bondage stuff.

The list for the 2000s is significantly longer and all of the names I like, I notice, are bondage models or do a lot of bondage. I guess I know what I like. I am also a fan of "natural" looking performers instead of "enhanced" (the distinction Falstaff mentioned), and almost all of my favorites fit that category. Maybe the pendulum is swinging back that way.

There is also a quality to the 70s celluloid movies that I find unappealing, and which I found unappealing back then. They are typically shot in glow-in-the-dark brilliant color. In addition to the turn-off of extremely hairy genitalia, a beaver shot almost looked like an open wound it was so red. And the cinematic style was to get really close up. So there was this huge hairy bright red wet gash projected on-screen, frequently being roughly poked with big thick pink fingers or being licked at by a big 'ol reddish-pink tongue (usually emerging from a bearded-and-mustachioed mouth, so it was TWO big hairy crimson orifices fencing with each other) and that is probably the reason I didn't enjoy porn as much back then.

But that's a tale for another post.

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 06:47:02 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

I need a point of clarification here -- is this question about the Golden Age of Porn about to become an official poll question?

Anyway, I'm not surprised that people can sometimes revisit old films and find they're not as great as people had remembered. As you get exposed to more and sometimes better material, your standards change.

Dare I say it, but in this current age of Attackers, I wonder how well some of the ZFX titles still hold up.

In the comments section for this clip from Slave Island 8, there is a comment that the Slave Island movies make zfx look boring. I have a Canadian friend who shares a similar view and while I don't personally think zfx has reached the point of being boring, I don't think it compares with my favorite Attackers films.

Indeed, I was surprised when I finally saw Night Prowler 5 as part of the Night Prowler 4 disc. For the longest time, I had heard about the great rape scene with lovely Candi Licks. Well, when I finally saw this scene, I was very disappointed. I don't know how the rape looked on VHS, but the scene on DVD was very dark (I mean lighting, not mood) and confusing. It was hard to see what was going on and watching the scene was not an enjoyable experience. Either something went wrong in the transfer of this scene or those of you who have memories of a terrific rape scene need to go back and revisit this one. Or maybe not -- why ruin a good memory?

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 07:27:02 AM

Name: Thanagar
Homepage URL:

I guess she just barely qualified as a 70's star (getting her start in '79), but I was always fond of Lisa De Leeuw, mainly because I like busty redheads (if only Lindsay Lohan would do a "Sex and Submission" shoot...). De Leeuw has a vid in her filmography called "Bound and Punished," but I've never seen it. Tragically, she died of aids in the early 90's.

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 07:39:54 AM

Name: Brutus

John Galt: Thanks for the hilarious reviews of those oldies, but not-so-goodies. I have perused the Something Weird site, and the titles and descriptions certainly are alluring. But like so many descriptions for other pseudo-GIMP products out there, they're too good to be true.

Lovemyzfx: The Travis Lee movie was one that had always interested me, so your information is greatly appreciated. I think that Travis is in a tough spot. Given his connection to ZFX, I think maybe people expect him to create films at or near the same level as Rick. And no one really has achieved that IMHO.

zee-ef-ex: That would be good news if Sex and Submission (or SocietySM) is available at video stores. I enjoyed your review, and "Jail or Slavery" has one other thing that is very important for me: a reason for tormenting the victim.

Actresses in the Golden Oldies vs. modern porn: Interesting topic. I think the rise of the Internet has made the comparison unfair. I have no numbers, but the spread of Net porn must translate into a huge increase in the number of actresses, and thus, a wider selection of women to choose from. But I would venture to guess that the current ratio of hot babes to unattractive women in the industry might be similar to that of the 1970s and 80s. Of course, that would be impossible to prove. My theory is based on the multitude of websites I've stumbled across that featured some downright horrendous looking women. Some interesting stats on Internet porn here.

Of course, I'm no expert on the current state of the porn industry since I have not watched a vanilla film in over a decade. But from some of the pictures I've seen of the top stars of today, I'd say I might even prefer the more natural look of some of the actresses from the past. Annette Haven and Constance Money have been mentioned. I'd also throw in Bridgette Monet, Joanna Storm, Abigail Clayton and Kelly Nichols. They just didn't look so fake. Another thing is that the stars of the past seemed to have more acting ability, at least compared to most of the actresses in the bondage films I've seen.

Serena was my favorite actress of the Golden Age because she was so sluttily hot and didn't seem to shy away from the rougher scenes. And yes, John Galt, Serena was definitely active in the late-1970s. I read somewhere that she was dating Jamie Gillis in real life, or maybe they were married, and that her career skidded to a halt because of an STD.

A Canadian: I have seen many, many Japanese films and I still prefer ZFX. I think the difference in our opinions may be our personal preferences: rape versus torture. For me, rape scenes don't do much unless the victim is tied down and gagged. And even then, I'd probably still prefer a good old whipping or shock treatment. That being said, I have seen Japanese films (Attackers and other studios) that are only about torture. Yet they lack the campy elements I so enjoy in ZFX films.

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 10:25:13 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

A Canadian: You're right, let's make this an official poll question. Hopefully it will trigger some discussion.

Thinking back to the Golden Age of porn, when they still allowed both bondage and hardcore rape scenes, do you think those films hold up as well today? And would the sex stars of that era still be successful if they were starting their careers in this decade? Along those lines, would you like to see today's adult stars perform without the politically correct restrictions that they had back in the 1970s and 80s?

This should have a lot of old timers (anybody who still remembers those adult films from the 70s and 80s) popping in their old videocassettes and taking a second look at the films that people used to be able to rent in the stores before the do-gooders took over society...and our adult entertainment. And it should have the younger crowd with their favorite stars of today wondering if they are missing something. Check out an example of what we used to be acceptable by clicking on the YouTied clip for Femmes de Sade.

And then come back here and take a few minutes to cast your votes. Let's get the board talking.

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 02:18:27 PM

Name: Matt
E-mail address:

The poll question: When I was in college, two of the video stores I'd rent from (both Mainstream and adult) had a lot of 1970s and 80s porn in their selection. I did see Taking of Christina, and I do have the Story of O (the original). I would be very interested in seeing Marilyn Chambers or Ginger Lynn doing GIMP, and some of the others, such as Tori Welles, Amber Lynn, Ashlyn Gere, etc. Bottom line, yes, the Golden Age does hold up well today, and yes, I do wish some of the 1980s (I'd put Marilyn Chambers in the '80s as well) had the opportunity to do GIMP stuff. Just my two cents.

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 05:31:22 PM

Name: Stevie
E-mail address:


Thinking back to the Golden Age of porn, when they still allowed both bondage and hardcore rape scenes, do you think those films hold up as well today? And would the sex stars of that era still be successful if they were starting their careers in this decade? Along those lines, would you like to see today's adult stars perform without the politically correct restrictions that they had back in the 1970s and 80s?

I feel that the Golden Age of PORN had much better actors and actresses then those of today and I feel that they would put the present group out of business if they were in their prime now.

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 05:52:45 PM

Name: Scout

Thinking back to the Golden Age of porn, when they still allowed both bondage and hardcore rape scenes, do you think those films hold up as well today? And would the sex stars of that era still be successful if they were starting their careers in this decade? Along those lines, would you like to see today's adult stars perform without the politically correct restrictions that they had back in the 1970s and 80s?

Yes I think those movies would do well now and the stars would have the smae success. And Iwish they would make movies today with that type of quality in bondage and rape scenes.

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 05:57:39 PM

Name: John Galt

Thinking back to the Golden Age of porn, when they still allowed both bondage and hardcore rape scenes, do you think those films hold up as well today? And would the sex stars of that era still be successful if they were starting their careers in this decade? Along those lines, would you like to see today's adult stars perform without the politically correct restrictions that they had back in the 1970s and 80s?

Hmm. Well as I have indicated, I do not think the old films have aged well at all, visually speaking. I am not so sure the old porn films' content holds up either. I did not see all that many XXX features in theaters. Most of the ones I saw were released later on VHS tapes, and sometimes the transfers left a lot to be desired. There were sloppy cuts and muddy sound and disconcerting jumps and dialog not synced with the action. All of those may have been sloppy production (originally) or sloppy transfer, but those tapes were all I had to go on.

The clip from Femmes de Sade is a prime example. It had a very gritty look to it. The sound was terrible. The voice-overs were blatantly obvious. It felt like a dirty little porn movie. It had a great rape scene, but with higher production values and more careful filming and editing it could have been awesome. The acting was not great, and (personally) I felt there was no emotional investment. Watching the scene, I didn't think the girl was getting raped. I thought the actress was pretending to get raped, and you know, there's a difference.

Sure, I would kind of like to see Little Orphan Dusty, Sex Wish, Autobiography of a Flea, Naughty Victorians/A Man With A Maid, Dirty Western, The Abduction of Lorelei, and a handful of others re-made with higher production values. Still, they were not as good as they could have been. I have to say that I never saw an adult movie that had the kind of raw brutality of a rape that matched the simulated rape(s) in I Spit on your Grave. Sex Wish and Dirty Western probably came closest, but not really. If the Golden Age of Porn had a wide-open field as far as bondage and rape scenes went, those scenes should have been better.

I have not watched a vanilla porn movie in years. The last one was Conquest, with Jenna Jameson and Shayla LaVeaux. It had pretty high production standards. It looked slick and felt professionally done, although it had some obvious flaws. But it was head and shoulders above any Golden Age of Porn movie I ever saw in every respect. I would love to see Barbara Broadcast re-made with today's production qualities and with the final bondage sex scene intact. That would be so cool. Gauge could take Constance Money's place. Or Sasha Grey. Yum.

As far as the performers go, I think some adult performers from the Golden Age of Porn were successful simply because they would do porn and their looks was a secondary consideration. There were some hot actresses, but there were a lot who were not.

The Internet has caused explosive growth in porn. It has also resulted in fewer adult performer superstars because there are so many, catering to many niche interests, that no one really stands out overall, although each niche has its own stars. It may be that the actual proportion of "hot" to "not" is the same as during the early 70's, but there are a lot more "hot" and "not" performers from which to choose. I'm sure every 70's era porn actress would be able to make it today, but none of them would stand out to the degree they did when the market was smaller.

Since I don't think the porn of the early 70's was really that great, I see no use in considering whether modern performers would do as well back then. However, I would like to see edgier adult films today, with the higher production values today's market demands. We are moving forward. Sex and Submission and the other similar BDSM sex web sites are treading into some new territory. It is a small step to go from BDSM sex role-playing of a kidnapping and rape or nonconsensual sex to making a BDSM sex movie with the same elements. We may never get that on DVD. It may only be available via download going forward. We may need to adapt with the times.

My two cents.

Saturday, October 11th 2008 - 09:15:44 PM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

Thinking back to the Golden Age of porn, when they still allowed both bondage and hardcore rape scenes, do you think those films hold up as well today? And would the sex stars of that era still be successful if they were starting their careers in this decade? Along those lines, would you like to see today's adult stars perform without the politically correct restrictions that they had back in the 1970s and 80s?

I think that in terms of good-looking women, the 70s were the Silver Age, but the 80s were the Golden Age. Angel Kelly, the Lynns (Ginger and Amber; Porche was more active in the 90s), Sharon Mitchell, Nina Hartley, Shauna Grant, Hyapatia Lee... These were the lovelies who got me off then and still do. (I realize I'm one of the few here who LOVES "vanilla" porn -- I'd rather see a totally consensual scene between two -- or more -- good-looking people than a half-assed bondage or rape scene . Heresy!)

I'm more pissed that we don't get nice nude death scenes in horror movies any more. The upside-down one in Hostel was nice, but there should have been more!

Sunday, October 12th 2008 - 01:17:32 AM

Name: Scheer

The Golden Age of Porn I only started looking at porn films in the late 1980's as I first got a video player and all I got to see was what was available in sleazy stores in Soho, London. As far as 70's and 80's porn was concerned, this mostly consisted of third or fourth generation copies of HOM stuff for example, as well as, possibly German, material that may have dated from the same era.

From what I remember, the films themselves, with the exception of one German one (one of three called 'Rape Shorts') failed to really deliver. I thought the acting was atrocious, the audio terrible, and whilst the scenarios started off quite well they never seemed to reach a satisfactory conclusion (and so, nor did I!). The only redeeming feature were the girls: some of them were the voluptuous types that I like.

Having said that, I can see that some on here would have liked the more extreme stuff I saw: a dildo with crossed wires being used in a pussy and drawing blood; a labium being nailed to a table; drawing pins; electric cables attached to labia etc.. Those images remain with me because I was quite stunned by them. I'd never imagined anything like that and couldn't believe anyone would willingly allow that done on them. I know better now of course, but anyway, none of that did or does anything for me. I also find it hard to believe that that would be allowed now (would it?).

A measure of those old films value to me as porn material is that I no longer have any of them and have no wish to see them again (except that one particular 'Rape Short')

Now I'm so used to the high quality of Japanese productions made with seemingly no compromises that most of the western material, including I'm afraid most zfx films, does nothing for me. There are too many restrictions that prevent a decent film to be made.

So to answer the poll properly, firstly 'no', I don't think these films hold up well today; 'yes', the actresses could still do a job today; and 'yes' I would like to see today's stars do unrestricted bondage/rape films. But, I hold no hopes that it is ever going to happen on the same level as the Japanese adult film industry and therefore any western efforts won't interest me for the time being.

Sunday, October 12th 2008 - 01:53:15 AM

Name: John Galt

Scheer said: Having said that, I can see that some on here would have liked the more extreme stuff I saw: a dildo with crossed wires being used in a pussy and drawing blood; a labium being nailed to a table; drawing pins; electric cables attached to labia etc.. Those images remain with me because I was quite stunned by them. I'd never imagined anything like that and couldn't believe anyone would willingly allow that done on them. I know better now of course, but anyway, none of that did or does anything for me. I also find it hard to believe that that would be allowed now (would it?).

Insex did some pretty extreme things--much too extreme for my enjoyment in most cases. I haven't watched everything they did and cannot say exactly what they did do, but I watched one where a girl let them sew her lips closed. I think there's a good chance they did some of what you're talking about but I don't know for sure and really I have no great desire to find out. The original site was in operation for almost 8 years, as I recall, before it was forced to close in 2005. But the archives site linked above still makes the shoots available on a limited basis.


jhlipton said: I'm more pissed that we don't get nice nude death scenes in horror movies any more. The upside-down one in Hostel was nice, but there should have been more!

Hell, yeah. I'm pretty pissed about that, too! Or nice nude torture scenes. Or, come to think of it, much in the way of really hot nude scenes at all. But especially GIMP nude scenes (like the Hostel clip), which are few and far between.

Sunday, October 12th 2008 - 03:21:05 AM

Name: BigD
Homepage URL:

Brutal Violence is back!! For about a year or two it disappeared completely and changed the name to, but now brutal is back!....

I didn't like funnybdsm as the scenes were way too consensual for my tastes....

I do like many of the streaming movies though.... Why??

#1, the women are EXTREMELY hot. You just can't find better looking women ANYWHERE on other rape/torture type websites, and many of them have natural breasts which makes it more innocent and hot to me...

#2 In many of the movies the women are actually crying or screaming (to a point), and you can actually see the look of fear in their eyes...
While it's true that the torture and the whipping is staged, this site is so much better than many of the sites out there.

For example, I don't mean any disrespect to any of the producers advertised on here, but, some of them just look so fake....If they stepped up to make the movies more realistic, it would make the moves that much enjoyable. They just look too consensual, and even on the stills that I've seen for the movies, the women are rarely crying, they are rarely screaming. They just don't ACT like they should if they were being raped/tortured in real life...Why is this??? Is it that hard to act???.... Now with this said, I can't stomach real torture like Insex or, but I LOVE staged brutal rape and torture type scenes (as long as I know it's not real and the woman isn't really being hurt).... I do enjoy real welts from whipping though, which is why I love some of the Japanese Attackers movies so much....

I just hope doesn't wimp out on the quality of the movies like they started to do... with that said, I respect other's tastes regardless of whether I like it or not :)
Anyway, time to jump off my soap box :)

Sunday, October 12th 2008 - 02:55:30 PM

Name: Vince

Thanks for showing those pics from "The Taking of Christina". One of the best rape movies I've seen in a long time.

I really lament that my only copy of it was damaged.

Sunday, October 12th 2008 - 02:57:04 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

BigD: Good catch on the return of Brutal Violence. I was a member twice and really enjoyed it the first time, but early on in my second membership, they made the switch to FunnyBDSM and their movies got progressively worse...the key word being consensual. What used to be truly brutal became lighthearted and silly. I paid for brutal, not "funny" (which incidentally, they weren't that either).

The one thing that did improve in their newer shows was the video quality, larger and more sharper than before. That was of small consultation, though, since the content of those new movies sucked.

I took a look at the preview titles they are featuring on their site, and there are some old favorites back again...nasty, meanspirited titles like Cross-Questioning, Regrettable Seduction and Paralysed Abuse. And there are some different movies there that weren't original BV titles when I was a member, so maybe they are making new ones along the same vein. I wonder if the older shows are available in the sharp new video format, too. It might be worth joining to acquire new copies, but I'm still leary. I was burned once by them once and I won't be as quick to join again unless they prove to me that their stuff is as good as it used to be.

And if they only do streaming now, you can definitely forget about it. I'm not going to pay for something I can't keep. Too bad they don't offer the downloadable movie trailers they used to have every week...those were the impetus for me to join in the first place.

Sunday, October 12th 2008 - 07:41:30 PM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

Based solely on today's picture, I'm torn about Brutal Violence. On one hand, you have a nice-looking woman being tormented in a pretty severe, but non-bloody way. On the other hand, they make the all-too-common mistake of taping the leads to the nipples, instead of on the underside of the breast. I wanna see the pointees jiggle while she squirms, dammit!

Sunday, October 12th 2008 - 10:02:38 PM

Name: John Galt

Brutal Violence looks intriguing. Does anyone know for sure whether it is only streaming video? I would like to check it out but I'm with Ralphus--only if I can download and save the videos.

Monday, October 13th 2008 - 05:15:54 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: I wrote the people at Brutal Violence and got an e-mail today. They confirmed that indeed you can save the movies...they are not streaming. I still don't know if they've improved the video quality of the older shows now that technology has improved, or whether the newer stuff they're making is as nasty and brutal as what they used to put out. I was under the impression that the reason they toned them down the first time (and went with the name change) was because of the political climate at the time, even though they weren't based in the United States.

The reason I liked their older site was mainly because of the nonconsensual nature of their storylines, which makes all the difference. I would have no problem with referring to their old content as "rape and torture" videos, which to my knowledge, you DON'T get with even the more hardcore bondage sites like Sex and Submission, Fucking Dungeon and Fucked and Bound. That's what I'm looking for in my bondage fantasies.

If I had time (which I seldom do anymore) I would review some of the individual shows they have on their site. With the pressure of having to release a new 20-minute long movie every week, obviously some weren't as good as others, but some of them are real classics, IMO. When they were good, they really went over the top in showing unique torture and rape scenarios.

I still have a lot of their old movie trailers, too. I was going to upload some of them to YouTied, but the problem is they are in Real Media format, which YouTied for some reason won't accept. Anyone know an easy way to convert them?

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 08:21:34 AM

Name: Dan Hawke
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

The old porno actress discussion has brought up a lot of memories for me.

First I have come to realize I may be one of the oldest readers and occasional posters to this board. I could outline a somewhat cogent analysis of bdsm porn through a large chunk of the late 20th century (the 80's being my weakest/most vanilla decade). One thing that stops me is the fact that early on I used to write novel length posts to this board without getting much feedback at all from the members (search the archives -- you will find some two to four page posts about how I became a producer etc.). It seems to me that the current crop of posters are making this a more active board than it used to be, so kudos to them. Let me know if there is interest and I will post some installments of this history and see if anyone reacts.

I will have to agree with the majority who feel that the early porno actresses were less attractive than those working today. There were exceptions: Serena with her lovely inverted nipples comes to mind. The reasons for this are numerous. Societal changes that make porno more acceptable (not totally acceptable, mind you - but more) have brought a new crop/style of performer; the massive number of producers thanx to the democratization of the web; the advent of video equipment -- and its ever increasing quality; and many more factors.

However there is a downside to these pluses. Producing adult content is far less profitable than it used to be (even just five years ago). If you look around, you will note that more bdsm sites have closed than have opened in the past few years. A few big players are capturing the market and driving smaller folks under. In the roughly eight years of my career, I would say that my revenue has decreased by more than 60%.

This is one reason you won't see too many remakes of classic porn features. Basically the reward for a quick and dirty shoot is equal to the reward for trying to craft a storyline shoot that works on any level. Simple storyline stuff takes about three times the work. Well acted story line material -- and a solid storyline (my storyline stuff is really just outlined in the capture scene -- the remaining story being mainly implied) and you are talking ten to fifteen times the work. This means 10 to 15 times the needed compensation for the model; 10 top 15 times the effort in editing, etc.

I just released my best storyline video "DHM02: Training the Office Tramp" and it has sold no more than any other video, and far less than anything released a year or two ago. In fact I am certain I put nearly one hundred hours in the editing alone on this title.

Additionally I have seen a lot of discussion on this board (in the past) about the "right" some posters feel to get this material for nothing or next to nothing. Some of this discussion was with me, some with my distributor. Frankly those discussions are the reason I became far less active on the GIMP board. (I must admit, many posters did take the producer's side in this discussion -- so it wasn't entirely one sided, but it was bitter enough to color my personal perceptions and my feeling of the board as a community.)

The sad truth is that if I were starting the Dan Hawke operation today, it wouldn't last for more than a month or two. Whether this is because of the general state of the market -- or the fact that fans didn't like my stuff and would have voted me out of business with their wallets is something I can't be sure of.

One puzzling thing to me is the love fans (GIMPers comment often) have of all things Blakemore. In my own opinion I feel I am one of the purest purveyors of that style. I consider myself and Sergeant Major as the ones pushing the old school feel of Blakemore's stuff. Sarge and I have had frequent discussion about this. The fact that Blakemore himself likes my and the sarge's stuff is some indication this is true (my discovery of the main man of bondage and my eventual contact with him would be part of my historical overview).

Which brings me to another historical note on the original topic -- old school porno actresses.

Modern, mainstream porn can be identified as dating from Deep Throat being released in 1972. I was too young to see those movies in the theatre -- and wasn't really interested either -- since they had no rope in their productions.

But I didn't see Serena in porno first, but in loops put out by TAO and other producers of bondage magazines and 8mm bondage loops. The early 70's are roughly the time Blakemore appeared on the scene. And while marginally attractive women like Linda Lovelace were in theatres, the bondage producers in general, and Blakemore in particular, were shooting simply gorgeous women for the bondage mags and loops. Makes one wonder, doesn't it?

How could Blakemore get these great women to allow themselves to be tied up and tormented, while mainstream porno producers could find few attractive women to headline their efforts?

On a personal note, I hate that the man has become known as Blakemore. As a consumer of his pics and loops in the old HOM days (which pre-date video by 8 - 12 years) I never saw him credited as "John Blakemore".

The first video of his that HOM released was "Bittersweet Revenge" in which he credited himself as Jeremy Whitman. The first time I heard him named Blakemore was on a website that was pushing some of his product -- no idea where they got the name from - did they make it up? By the way, he gets not one dollar from anyone selling his material. Everyone selling it is, to one degree or another -- ripping the man off.

Mighty sad end for the man many consider to the grandfather of modern bondage porn. To me, there was bondage porn before "Whitman" (the name I have always thought of him as) and bondage porn after. It took producers nearly thirty years to bring any new ideas to the field IMHO (as "new" I am thinking of some insex stuff -- and later the Hogtied family of sites). Even then those few new ideas are still mixed in with about 85% of the ideas Whitman gave our little kink.

Kind of makes one wonder why anyone bothers to produce GIMP material at all, doesn't it?

~Dan Hawke

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 09:21:57 AM

Name: Scheer
Homepage URL:

To convert Real Media files to something else, use SUPER. It converts most things to most other file types. It's not fast but it works and is free. Take particular note of the download instructions (MSIE means your temporary internet files). I've used it often to convert RM files so that I can put them on a DVD.

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 11:42:06 AM

Name: BlueDog
E-mail address:


All due respect man. Seriously. You bring a lot to this forum when you post and you've made some very good movies that I like and still have. Nevertheless I have to disagree with a lot that you've said in your post. I hope you take these criticisms in stride as I'm really just trying to offer a helpful opinion.

I'm one of the fans of all things Blakemore. Curiosity Excited the Kat is still one of my favorites. From a technical sense, I do agree that nobody is putting out that style of bondage as well as yourself, but only from a technical sense, meaning the ropes are tight, the bondage is uncomfortable, lots of crotch ropes, etc. It certainly looks like Blakemore's stuff. But it doesn't feel like it, not to me anyway. To begin with, Whitman (ok, let's call him Whitman, not Blakemore), had a presence. He brought a lot to the drama of his works and seemed quite a threatening figure.

Don't take it badly Dan, but for me, you kind of spoil your own work by being in it. I'm sorry man, and I'm really not trying to offend. Also Whitman didn't keep the models gagged constantly and they often did a great job of projecting fear. It's hard to put into words, but when I watch CEtK or Bittersweet Revenge, or The Experiment, I feel like I'm seeing women in real peril with real fear. In your films I see a model struggling with an uncomfortable tie. Also a lot of your work suffers from background noise, hammering, even saws, etc. Finally, I often feel like your work (and ZFX films suffer from this too) all too often seem washed out, or slightly out of focus, or something. I'm not a film guy. All that plus the weird camera angles make me hesitate whenever I see new Dan-Hawke stuff. In my humble opinion Dan you are a 'purveyor of that style' only in the sense that you rig tightly with lots of crotch ropes. Nothing wrong with that, but you're still a far cry from a real Whitman production.

Course I do understand that Whitman had Renee Baker and a few others that could REALLY sell a scene. Whose to say what you could do with access that that kind of talent?

If Whitman ever released a line of DVD quality releases, either his old stuff sharpened up, or better yet, new stuff along the same lines, I'd gladly fork over $50 a copy.

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 11:54:10 AM

Name: uksteveok

Dan Hawke: I would be love to hear more of your history of porn. I am fascinated by the HOM, Calstar and Tao films. I find them far superior to much of the modern alternatives such as Insex. This is probably because I find the girls more feminine and much sexier than the modern girls. (I am one of those who hate tattoos which is probably consistent)

Another group I belong to recently had a lengthy discussion about who Blakemore was and what had become of him but concluded that nobody knew. It would also improve my enjoyment of the films to know more about the girls.

I really only like films with some sort of storyline to them. There is something magical watching the girls walk/talk themselves into trouble - when they clearly knew what was going to happen to them.

I have collected some Dan Hawke stills from the news groups - but I never got the impression of a story line - so did not pursue site membership (or video sharing - it was too painful on a 28k modem). It may be relevant that the few sites that got money out of me were ones where I could get a really clear idea of what I was going to get before I paid up. Non-recurring membership and enough content to be good value.

Picking up on the Brutal Violence thread - I joined BV after downloading a free video from the net and enjoying it thoroughly. Many of their videos were excellent but I got a bit tired of the same formula after a while - first part story, second part rather unlikely torture - third part bondage sex. Not actually as good as The Experiment (HOM) but the better picture quality and sound made up for a lot.

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 12:30:44 PM

Name: travis lee

saw the review of a film i made, you guys are tough, take it from me its nor easy to do this on no money but just fun, thats why rick is the best !!!! he can make money, also lovemyzfx thanks for the heads up on hamster site , do you have any more sites you know of that are simular to this ??? sorry it was so long since last past, but been out of town anf busy, ps, like funnybdsm, hot girls and pretty good action !!! if anybody wants to know larry at videomayhem has more movies we shot with the girls of mpls.,

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 02:01:18 PM

Name: John Galt

Oh yeah. I love discussions and differing points of view.

Dan Hawke: Well you naturally will not get me talking about posts that are too long since I probably post some of the longest ones. I figure there's a scroll bar so anyone who doesn't want to slog through my posts can just take note of my name at the top and start scrolling down. The forum equivalent of the fast-forward button.

I missed out on a lot of early fetish and BDSM stuff because I never did get a projector when all the most interesting things seemed to be on 8mm. I can still remember ads for fetish loops and films that I really wanted to watch but circumstances prevented. I was so glad when VHS VCRs came along. Still, it was rare that I came across good BDSM stuff even in the rental sections of "adult" video stores. I think Bruce Seven and Kym Wilde were the video products I saw most often, and those were rare, and rarely edgy enough. I don't know of Blakemore/Whitman, although that is not to say I might not have seen some of his stuff and just not known. I'll have to look into that.

I am not as concerned with a plot so much as a sustained and believable video sequence. I am perfectly happy with a quickie setup during an abduction scene or even in some initial expository dialog before the GIMP kicks into high gear. I am not expecting a polished script, although it would be nice for performers to have a variety of responses instead of "uhh...uhh...uhh" or "" or the other handful of standard victim sounds. And it is always nice when a performer sells a scene, and even nicer when the performer is involved and obviously testing her limits. So I am on-board with only minimal storyline unless more plot enhances the action.

Your web site is on my list of sites to check out, along with Sarge's. But I need to pace myself for financial reasons. My list has grown exponentially since I found this forum and its list of links. As you know from an earlier feature-length post of mine, I like S&S, F&B and FUD for the bondage sex, but really only a few updates from each make my Favorites List, and those always include role-playing (of nonconsensual sex or rape) or situations where I can tell the model is being pushed. I like the Powershotz clips where the models are being pushed, and since they are primarily amateurs, that happens a bit more frequently. I am really intrigued by Brutal Violence.

Good technically correct and strict bondage for its own sake is not high on my personal list of Things I Look For in a BDSM Site. I like the threat to the model of violence and nonconsensual sex or rape, and ideally the successful illusion of violence, nonconsensual sex or rape during the action. So that's what I am personally looking for in a BDSM product.

I am all for paying for products that I like, and I do believe producers have every right to profit from their labors. But I cannot resist playing devil's advocate with a question. You noted that any Blakemore/Whitman stuff that is out there for consumption does not profit the man in any way, and that technically those distributors are ripping him off. So how guilty would you feel about downloading any of that stuff for free, thereby ripping off the people who are ripping off Blakemore/Whitman?

And finally, I am also all in favor of you taking time to post your views and the history of BDSM. I generally only comment when I have something to say, but I am infrequently at a loss for words.

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 02:37:18 PM

Name: Dan Hawke
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:


I am not offended at all by your comments. I would be the first to admit that Whitman had a real presence and oozed menace whereas I often come off as something of a teddy bear. Occasionally I rise to some level of menace (usually if the model really brings that out in me), but that is not always the case. If you feel a roly poly fellow can never be menacing though, that is out the window.

As to the crazy camera angles, there was a huge discussion about this on this very board and I modified my style as a result of that discussion. Sadly a lot of footage was in the can by the time this discussion occurred. Thus many DVD's later there are still a lot of "dutch angles" in what I release, but later material is almost angle free. To recap I began shooting in a cramped apartment. I could not get a full shot of a model in a standing position, let alone an AOH position without a camera tilt. Later when I didn't have to have them, I still used them as part of a personal style. Personally I don't find them as troubling as many do, but I tend to not use them anymore, or to use them in a very limited way. I would be loathe to say there are no dutch angles in dhm02 - my memory just isn't that good. But if they are in that title - there won't be many of them.

Actually I found your distinction between being technically like Whitman and having the "feel" of Whitman a cogent and valid explanation for why you like his classics and may not find my stuff as appealing. I was going to rebut your models struggling comment, but in the end realized it was true. I have brought models to tears with some of my positions, but that is not the feel of classic HOM Whitman.

I have never personally been a fan of much story in a video. Even classic Whitman storyline videos like Bittersweet Persuasion was fast forward material for me. I think the format he worked in (having to present his 3 - 5 positions and a story "idea" in a 12-15 minute loop of film help explain their power. What frustrated me about those was that when the model was really, really suffering, the scene ended - mostly due to time constraints.

But he is the master - indisputably.

I think the material on his Bondage classics and a lot of the Asian porn gain a real benefit from lack of dialog (except for those fluent in Japanese). They seem to have a storyline - which a lot of Gimpers like. At the same time, the action in many seems incredible real in most of them. Personally I have an extensive collection of Asian Bondage porn and I think it is, mostly, real with real reactions.

That is why I like sites like insex and hogtied etc. more than many Gimpers do. I watch every scene with my antenna on high alert, looking for those "real" moments. Those sites are nothing if not real. To me that is ten, no a hundred times more important that storyline. Uksteveok is right that my videos have no real story, but merely a situation to hang the scenes off of. Even DHM02 establishes the story only in the initial scene. Beyond that the only connection is that both I and the female tormentor (Payton a good domme) refer to why Madison Young (the star) is being punished. And she has the same costume throughout the vid, which is cut and torn away slowly from scene to scene.

My derision of storyline vids will also help to explain the next statement I will make. Blasphemy on this board.

There is not a single ZFX that I have seen (and I have seen about 98% of them) that rises to the level of a personal favorite title. I have favorites created by Jay Edwards, Bryan Davis, hell even some old Bonvue material (though I don't think the company was called that at the time) - in spite of the fact that Bill Majors comes off as much like a big Teddy Bear as I do myself - if not more so. This doesn't mean I don't appreciate what Rick does. He had male dom product available when no-one else was providing it. There are brilliant moments in many of his videos. But for me the storylines are total fast forward material. And I don't really get the appeal of camp humor. To me it ain't what porno (especially bondage porno) should be. Finally almost nothing feels real in most ZFX vids. That said, there are visceral real moments in Rick's vids, they just aren't the focus. Kudos to Rick though, he clearly seems to have found what the majority of the market likes.

So I don't have a problem with criticism - or folks who don't get my stuff. To me, when I step out of the frame and let the model suffer - that's the essence of my product. I want to watch them endure what I have wrought until all the acting is wrung out of them and the "real" begins to emerge.

I will begin to write my historical opus in the near future - and continue it as long as anyone seems to be responding. I am, you'll notice, rather long winded.

However, a teaser.

About two or three years ago, I got an email from a Gimper who had read what I had to say about Whitman. Whitman himself will not access the net, but this guy had read or told him what I had written. The great man wanted to talk to me, but would only do it if I gave his buddy my phone #. Was this for real? Was it a gag? I took the chance and gave the # and Whitman himself called me. From the first drawl of his voice I knew he was the real deal. You may think I am just being snowed, but I am 100% convinced. I put him in touch with the Sarge, who had his own doubts. And I remember when Sarge called me back and said, "Damn you were right, it really is him."

He's still around, though hasn't done anything other than personal bondage since the early eighties. In fact, he hadn't even seen his own stuff for more than twenty years, so I duped a bunch of his stuff and sent it to him. And me and Sarge have gotten to hear anecdotes first hand from the greatest bondage producer of all time (once again IMHO).

In short, if it weren't for the Gimp board, I would never have "found" him (though he actually found me).


PS: John Galt: some of the insex stuff is too weird even for me (though I always find it fascinating even when my trigger goes untripped). And much of it may be too intense for your tastes. However I would be willing to bet that you would find 60% or more of his material to be the pinnacle execution of classic bondage riffs we all love. I'm not shilling for pd, but I can't deny his technical mastery or the bondage form.

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 04:45:15 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

John Galt wrote:

But I need to pace myself for financial reasons. My list has grown exponentially since I found this forum and its list of links.

I'm sure it has. One of the unintended consequences of becoming an official GIMPer is discovering just how much stuff is out there -- and wanting it. You do have to learn to pace yourself.


Dan Hawke: You can add me to the list of people who would enjoy reading about the history of bondage movies. I've never seen a Whitman (Blakemore) film, as I don't think we can get his stuff in Canada. But I enjoy reading posts from the producers about the ideas that inspire their work. I think most people here feel the same way.

By the way, here is a link to my review from last year of Slave Island 7. You may or may not be interested in the movie, but I post the link to remind you and John Galt that when it comes to lengthy posts, neither of you can match The King.

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 05:30:39 PM

Name: BlueDog
E-mail address:


'Teddy Bear' is actually the term that came to mind. I didn't use it as it does us no good to be name calling here, much less to the producers that grace us with their presence. We've actually gone back and forth over this a bit quite a while back. I had mentioned Jenni Lee in The Rave as an example of something that didn't quite deliver, which was a big disappointment for you. Yes, her reactions were great, and she even cried (and no, I don't think she was faking). It's just that she seemed to be crying due to love taps from a teddy bear.

I'm complaining, but do keep in mind that I still have that flick, still watch it, and still enjoy it. Moreover, I've caught myself watching other flicks (B&DPleasures is particular) with poor rigging and wishing they had a Sarge or DH to learn em on how it's done. One point you do have is that many good scenes have too many cuts. Tourist Trap is a great example. Great ties, great acting, great models and hardly a single scene that lasts more than 10 seconds.

So you actually talked to the man????!??!??

Do tell!

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 06:15:46 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Sometimes this site amazes me. Yesterday we had one brief 3-sentence post the entire day, and today we've been so active it took me a half-hour just to read everything that's been posted.

Dan Hawke: Welcome back from lurkdom; this place is always better whenever you stop by. You've been one of my favorite posters for a long time, and not only that, you're an icon in the business so whatever you have to say is going to be appreciated, even if we don't always respond as often as you'd like.

Just remember you don't have to write a book every time you post. I know Rick Masters has told me he doesn't post as often as he would like because he feels it takes too long to type up a long post. I'll tell you what I told him: It's quality not quantity. Even a few sentences every now and then goes a long way. Besides that, long posts are kind of overwhelming to read, and I know they take a long time to write, too. Posting shouldn't have to be a chore. If you have time and want to write a long post, go ahead. But don't feel like you're required to. No one needs to dethrone The Canadian King of Verbose, although John Galt sure comes close.

I had heard rumors that Whitman was dead, but I also heard that Sgt. Major was going to be working with him, so I wasn't sure what to believe. I was thinking that Blakemore must have been a different guy than Whitman, but now I guess they were truly the same man. Very interesting stuff indeed. Whitman is as close to a living legend as we have in this fetish (especially if he truly is living). He's sort of the bondage equivalent to J. D. Salinger, highly respected but mysterious and reclusive at the same time. I had just assumed he had been dead for years. If you have any stories to relate about him, please pass them on. This is quite a scoop.

John Galt: I can't explain who Whitman was as well as someone like Dan, but you've definitely seen his stuff. He's the one behind all those great House of Milan bondage stills and loops, especially the Erotic Perversion collection (I ran some stills from one of the loops as the daily picture a while back...might have been before you got here). There's stuff on YouTied from him; check out my Homepage URL for one of those loops (but turn down your sound, this one is LOUD!). Even without sound, these were among the greatest bondage films ever made.

I have more to say, but I'm going to take my own advice and cut this one short. Thanks to everyone who posts; you make this site a fun place to visit.

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 08:07:47 PM

Name: DHT

Dan, as far as the menacing teddy bear thing goes, no worries. You are the guy that makes the video happen. You are the guy that gets the models, does the filming, does the work, and makes the video. That is all we should ask. For me at least, it is all about the girls. The guy/torturer/captor can be whatever. The less of him in proportion to the girl the better.

Tuesday, October 14th 2008 - 09:53:01 PM

Name: Scribbler
Homepage URL:

Yes, John Blakemore is not Whitman. I too, for a while, followed what I had heard from others: that Blakemore/Whitman/Cole all referred to the same person, but have concluded this year, that this is not the case. Whitman/Cole were alias names associated with the slim, bearded guy we all suspect masterminded the best of classic HOM, but Blakemore was another person.

John Blakemore was credited as Photo Editor in lots of HOM bondage mags from 1981 to 1988. The photographers and riggers, however, were never (with a couple exceptions I'll get to below) credited in the mags. This I believe is why numbers of people guessed at, concluded, the photographer / rigger must be Blakemore. All they had to go by in the mags was this photo editor credit, the only credit related to photos (mostly) I can see how this mistaken association came to be.

However, photo editor in mags is not a photographer credit, it's not a taking photos, setting up lighting, working with and rigging models credit. A photo editor works with the editor to choose photos, get them developed as necessary (the right sizing) to layout in the magazine. He might be a photographer, but he doesn't have to be, and the photo editor credit doesn't say he is!

Now, while I haven't gone through and read all the HOM mags I have, I did find 2 references to photographer credits. These I didn't find in the magazine production credits which HOM started to include around 1978. I found one in the editorials, which is repeated a number of times in different mags. And another in one magazine as text in a certain model's spread.

The editorial one is written, or attributed to be written, by Barbara C. Behr herself. Here's what she writes: "..The sameness that you can count on [referring to HOM mags] is I am the one with the camera in my hands. Hopefully or regretfully (depending on your point of view), I only shoot what I like to see! And, if a set falls flat on its face, I never get around to scheduling it in a magazine. I think I have a few sets left in the drawer that have been there for fifteen years! Barbara C. Behr"

So here Barbara credits herself as photographer. Should be noted though that HOM had two styles of mags, the classic Whitman style I really liked, and a softer style which didn't do much for me. She may very well be the photographer of the softer stuff. Of maybe she was behind the camera when Whitman appeared with models in some photo spreads. Maybe she did shoot Whitman's rigged models sometimes. Don't know.

The only other photographer credit I found (so far) was in Bondage Classics #21 (1982), where a latina model named Red (later dubbed Patti Whitman in future mags) has the following write up in her photo spread titled "THE LADY NAMED RED." The copy reads "Lucky Jeremy Whitman being married to a beauty like this. Jeremy, a cinematographer of ours, sometimes gets carried away when he gets home after work. Of course, he explains to Red that he is only trying out new ideas for our movies, but I think Red knows exactly what is going on. And lucky us that Jeremy took these stills of their last session. Yum!" So here, Jeremy Whitman is mentioned to be an HOM cinematographer, and is credited to having taken "Red's bondage photos" which is his only photographer credit in a mag that I know of (besides the later Calstar mags about Calstar videos). BTW, in the same BC #21 mag, the photo editor credit is John Blakemore.

Also of note is that magazine credits started appearing as far back as 1978 and the photo editor credit then, from 1978 to 1981, was Russell Budd. And Whitman photos filled Russell Bud photo edited mags too. Whitman photos actually go back to 1974, maybe earlier, though mags that old had no magazine production credits. And, I also have a later HOM mag, passed the Whitman era, that doesn't have Whitman photos in it, and the photo editor is John Blakemore.

None of this is super definitive. HOM didn't exactly do a great job letting us know who the photographers, riggers were. Or even models. We have a lot of unnamed HOM models that we only recognize by looks. But right now, I'm standing by the reasoning that the slim bearded guy who is definitely credited as Whitman, and later Matthew Cole in the Calstar Punished videos, was never actually ever referred to as Blakemore by Barbara Behrs HOM crew. Blakemore was another guy.

Also, in Sgt. Majors blog, I recall him saying the guy he talks to occasionally that he calls "Blakemore" (which I wish he would stop doing!) told him that after a shoot, he would give the shot film to Barbara, and Barbara would take it from there, as far as turning it into product. Also, this person Sgt. Major is in contact with says he doesn't know the model names from mags and films, he didn't deal with that part of it. Both of these things mean while he performed the jobs of bondage photographer and cinematographer, he didn't perform the job of photo editor. Cause if he did, he would have worked on the layout of mags and he'd know the model names.

So we should not be calling the slim bearded guy Blakemore, only Whitman or Cole. Or to put this long post another, shorter, way: Dan Hawke is right. :)

Wednesday, October 15th 2008 - 02:18:48 AM

Name: Brutus
Homepage URL:

Dan Hawke: I would also like to hear about the history of BDSM porn, particularly the Whitman stuff. Just a thought, but this history subject appears to be close to your heart, and you certainly have tons of information. Have you ever thought about writing a book on the matter? Perhaps to enlighten the masses? Just a thought.

As for you being a "teddy bear" villain, I think your size does bring an intimidating element to the scenes. If I had one complaint, it's that your voice is just too nice, and I mean that in the nicest way, I think. But I must say that you have applied some of the tightest crotch ropes I've ever seen.

As for plots in bondage films, I'd rather have them so I can identify more with the characters. The plot buildups (provided they aren't too long) are sort of like foreplay before the climax of the woman getting tied up and abused. The scenes, for me at least, seem much more complete if there's a reason behind the torment.


travis lee: Always nice to hear from you and glad to know you had fun tying up Suzi Sexton. (It would be hard not to!)


Poll question: If you haven't seen any 1970s porn, I finally managed to upload the dildo rape scene from Sex Wish on YouTied (above URL.)

Wednesday, October 15th 2008 - 07:32:56 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Brutal Violence update: Being ever so-curious to see if this website was going back to producing the type of films they used to make, I sent off an e-mail to their customer support department and asked them straight out what their intentions were. How often would they update, and would their new shows be truly brutal like they were before, or lighthearted and consensual like FunnyBDSM was?

Well, here's the poop. What's on the new Brutal Violence is simply the old stuff that was removed from the other site. Because there was so much demand for the old stuff, they've decided to put it back online. But get this: they don't update. No more new stuff whatsoever. Their cost to join for 30 days is 34.95 (pounds), which, doing the pounds to dollars conversion, equals out to about $60.95 a month. Amazingly, they also give you the option to join for an entire year, which equals out to $523.00 a year. But why join for a year if you won't be getting any new shows? If you're really interested in seeing what the site has to offer, your best bet would be to join for a month, grab everything they have and get out of there.

That sealed the deal for me. I was there before and got what I wanted. But there's no way I would join again if there's not going to be anything new. Is 60 bucks worth it to grab all their shows? Well, you do get a LOT of good material. If you figure your average fetish DVD is $20 to $30, you're getting way more than that if you download all their shows while you're there. So it's up to you. I'm just really glad I checked before I decided to take the plunge again. And I pity any unfortunate soul who pays for a year's membership thinking he'll be getting a year's worth of new entertainment.

Wednesday, October 15th 2008 - 09:15:06 AM

Name: Dan Hawke
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:


Thanx for your explanation of where the name "Blakemore" came from. I certainly wasn't looking at the magazine credits back in the day - being too busy with the pictures! The surviving mags I have haven't been looked through as research to write any of this. I think you are close on the time frame of the start of Whitman's groudbreaking career though I think some of his work appeared just a bit earlier, say 71 to 72.

As you said, Whitman only knows about his own stuff - and even then he only knows the model names as they appeared in the actual mags, for a few models. Generally I will describe a model and he will say something like, "Oh that's Betty Boop" or whatever her real name is.

About six years ago I met Geoffrey Merrick at a NYC bondcon and he gave me my best inside info on old HOM. According to him Whitman was an independent producer who was affiliated with HOM on a "pay as he produced" basis. So perhaps "ripped off" in my previous post was too strong a word. However when Barbara Behr sold HOM (info from another long time fan - even older and richer with knowledge than me) the rights to Whitman's products became murky. However anyone selling them now is not reimbursing the man who produced them nor the person (Barbara) he sold his rights to at all any longer.

According to Merrick HOM was pretty much a Barbara Behr/Bishop production (yes, the classic artist Bishop). Blakemore may have been a pseudonym for Behr or Bishop or both - or perhaps some other person. Geoffrey told me that they used to jokingly refer to Whitman as "Catfish Mengeles" because of his southern drawl and his incredibly evil bondage! Those who don't know who the real Mengeles was should study some history - he was one of the most evil men in modern history - evil in a totally non-erotic way.

Behr may have actually worked with Whitman a few times (Merrick is the source for this too). Towards the end of the great HOM run there were a few videos featuring Whitman and some non-Whitman models (the classic Whitman girls were all recruited by the great man himself). I speak primarily about videos such as the "Greek File" and one or two others I can't recall the names of.

These were more hit and miss HOM affairs featuring scenes with the Whitman touch as well as softer scenes featuring models like Pia Sands (Snow?) and others. I suspect there was some tension when Whitman himself appeared with a non-Whitman model (as in the fireplace scene - the single best scene - in the "Greek File"). I think the Tourist Trap films may have also been joint productions - though those clearly had more artistic input from Whitman than "The Greek File" did.

Eventually (again according to Merrick) Barbara began to get some serious hassling from the Justice Department. In particular they were very unhappy with the Punished videos and a few other Whitman titles. When Barbara pulled them from HOM distribution the trouble disappeared. However HOM became pretty lame and, I imagine, far less profitable after that, which may account for Barbara's eventual sale of the company.

HOM was the company that Whitman built and while he was compensated - at a rate he certainly had to agree to, there is no doubt that others have made much more money from his work than he ever did.

Ralphus: I appreciate that I can make a short, occasional post, However having an early ambition to be a published author (I bought an electric typewriter with money from my first part-time job's very first paycheck - kids research what a typewriter is..) I find short posts nearly impossible to manage. Generally what I want to say can't be said in a sentence or two. In fact, these posts are something of a reward coz I got so much done in the past few days of working - these post are my bizarre reward to myself! Sadly I should be editing video instead of writing this now, so I will probably post less frequently (though suddenly everyone responds to what I'm writing! - geez - talk about careful what you wish for!!!).

John Galt, easy research into the Whitman cannon: There are two popular series of scans which were all over the web in the early days of the WWW explosion and I bet these are still out there today (though I don't have time to troll newsgroups any longer). These series were CHAD and HOWL. CHAD was the better, larger series and almost all of the HOWL photos are dupes of a similar CHAD images. I have 5729 CHAD images in my personal collection. These are all scans from old HOM mags and are 98% Whitman (an estimate, but a pretty fair one). Perhaps Ralphus could post some CHAD images as I am sure he has his own collection (if not he can write me).

Also everyone has copies of the Bondage Classics series (old HOM loops converted to video) and these are about 80% Whitman. Other classic titles not already mentioned include The Trainers, Sweet Nightmares and the infamous Punished series.


Wednesday, October 15th 2008 - 09:15:56 AM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: Thanks for going the extra mile to find out about Brutal Violence. I might just have to sign up for a month and download the good stuff. You know, what they might be doing to keep people coming back is just posting a certain number of the old shoots, and then swapping them out on a monthly or weekly basis. It doesn't make a lot of sense to join for a year with no new updates. Unless they were letting members figure that out for themselves. That's pretty evil.


Dan Hawke: I think maybe I have seen some of the Whitman classic loops in some old "History of Rape" and "Dominators" VHS tapes I bought from Alpha Blue Archives several years ago. I have a huge collection of BDSM images I culled from UseNet back in the 90s as well, and I seem to recall seeing CHAD and HOWL in some filenames. I'll have to dig those CD archives out and check them again. And I just joined the Chadscans Yahoo Group which specializes in CHAD images as well. I haven't had time to explore the group too deeply yet.


I came across an interesting movie at that surprisingly was not a total disappointment. Lots of rape scenes.

Carcere Amori Bestiali (AKA Brutal Love Prison) (1994)

I came across Carcere Amori Bestiali at, where it was available for download to members under the title Brutal Love Prison. It is in Italian, I think. The subtitles are in another language. Maybe Portuguese. When I went to Babel Fish and translated the subtitled movie title, it translated (Portuguese to English) to "Sex Outlaw." That sounds more like this movie. According to IMDB it is about a congresswoman who lobbies for conjugal prison visits, but I didn't get that. The movie is basically a string of rapes. Lots of rape.

It starts with a pretty blond (with a garland of flowers around her head like a floral headband) doing a lot of exposition. In another language. I don't have a clue what she is saying. There is a high probability that she's identifying herself as a congresswoman who is lobbying for conjugal visits. Then she goes jogging and her path takes her past a group of five guys kicking at a ball, kind of playing soccer maybe but not really. When she runs by, they decide it would be more fun to play with her. They surround her, push her back and forth between them, run their hands up under her clothes and pull her sweat shirt top up enough to reveal her belly but that's all. Then one of the guys breaks it up and protectively pulls her away and says something and they all walk away.

Next scene the guy and the blond are in her house and they do a fairly boring XXX sex scene. I notice she is wearing heels with her jogging outfit and I wonder if she was jogging in heels. So I rewound and sure enough, she was jogging in heels. Those Italians. And she is not really a blond, which I deduced from her heavy dark Brooke Shields eyebrows but confirmed once he got her pants off. (But he never did take her top off, which was a bit annoying. I like women in sex scenes to be naked.) So standard XXX sex.

Cut to a dark haired girl petting a dog outdoors. The same five guys walk up and grab her, except this time they pick her up and toss her back and forth between them. The guy who just nailed the blond almost drops her. I guess it's true what they say about sex with girls and sports performance. She does a lot of verbal protesting, but not a lot of fighting. They lay her on a brick wall and pull off her pants. While three of them take turns having her fellate them, the guy who just nailed the blond fucks her. The fifth guy just sort of stands there. There is no climax to this scene. It just abruptly cuts to two of the guys peeing on her and making "O" faces as they do it. Personally, peeing never did that for me, but I'm not an Italian rapist so what do I know. Also, they never took her top off, either. What do these guys have against breasts?

Next scene, the five guys are leaning against a wall playing around with each other (in a roughhouse masculine way). Three girls are working on a motorcycle without much success. They decide it would be a good idea to call over the five guys, because, you know, all guys know how to fix motorcycles. It's a guy thing. They walk over and immediately grab the girls. I mean, they don't even pretend to help them first in order to build up suspense. Just wham bam thank you ma'am.

However, as rape scenes go this one is not bad. The girls are forced to suck cocks and they are fucked vigorously. They are also whacked in the face roughly with semi-hard cocks, a penis use that I never really understood. The girls make all the right victim noises, along with some pain and humiliation noises. They do not fight back as strenuously as they might have, but they don't just let themselves be fucked. All of a sudden one of the guys stands up and says something and they all decide they've had enough, so they just walk away. No real climax. The girls are left huddled and crying on the ground, though, which is a nice touch. I saw maybe two and a half of the six breasts during all of that scene.

Cut to a domestic scene of the blond congresswoman and her rapist boyfriend doing the dishes and talking. No clue what they are saying, but I'm betting he isn't telling her he's raped and pissed on other women since they last had sex. Anyway, he picks her up and sits her on the counter top and goes down on her briefly before she goes down on him. She loves him. I recognize that word and it shows up in the subtitles a lot. Suddenly she's back on the counter top and he's fucking her. She is still fully dressed, by the way, just with her dress bunched up around her hips. When it is time for him to come, they just barely get the condom off in time and it appears that he shot quite a load because she kind of spits it back out around sucking his cock and she spits out quite a bit. I would opine that this guy has a high sperm production rate, but since no one ever comes during the rape scenes, I guess he's just been saving it up for her. What a thoughtful guy.

New scene and this same guy drives up to the blond congresswoman's house (in the country, it looks like), gets out and looks around (the blond congresswoman is not home), then opens the back door of the car and he and another guy manhandle another girl into the house, all while she's struggling and saying "no." (Babel Fish translated it as "not" but I'm guessing it is closer to "no.") She fights a bit more effectively, but that is not saying much. Still, this plays out like a good rape scene. They wrestle her to the couch and she is made to perform oral sex for a while, then they turn her kind of upside down and one guys fucks her mouth while the other guy takes the more traditional approach of fucking her pussy. They double team her for a while and she makes great victim noises.

Trouble arrives in the form of the blond congresswoman, who drives up and walks in on them raping this girl. You can tell by her expression that she is sad and disappointed at this turn of events. So she walks out and leaves the girl to be raped. Just like a real congresswoman would do because a real congressman would probably try to get in on the action. Both guys come in the victim's mouth but she spits it back out and in both cases it runs down her cheek and into her hair.

The blond congresswoman arranges an outdoor meeting with her rapist boyfriend and it looks like she tells him how disappointed she is. She pushes him into an empty swimming pool and stalks off in a huff. It looks like his leg is hurt, but as we see shortly, it is not.

The blond congresswoman is in her kitchen, thoughtfully placing a teakettle on the stove when her former rapist boyfriend walks in. With his friend. They grab her and take her to the same couch on which they just raped that other girl. They have a brief discussion, in which the rapist boyfriend says something like "let me talk to her," so the other guy walks out. He says something to her and she says something back that doesn't sound good and then spits in his face which pretty much seals it. The other guy walks back in and says something and the rapist boyfriend answers but all I can make out from my pathetic language skills is "sure, why not?"

Next thing, the blond congresswoman is tied up with one breast exposed and the nipple being threatened with scissors while her mouth is being threatened with a broken bottle. She is naked except for her bra, which is being pulled down to expose her breasts occasionally, and thigh-high white lace hose. What is it with these guys and their aversion to upper body nudity? Her rapist boyfriend pushes down her bra and pulls on her nipple, which is erect and pretty big, and runs the edge of the broken bottle back and forth against it. He pinches it between thumb and forefinger and pulls it out like he's going to slice it off. But he doesn't. The other guy runs the edge of a knife against her belly and her breasts and nipples. Her rapist boyfriend moves down between her legs with the broken bottle in hand. He fucks her with the mouth of the bottle (the unbroken end). She makes helpless and frightened victim noises.

Suddenly she is flat on the couch with her hands tied (really sloppy and loose ropework, by the way) and pulled over her head, while they take turns finger fucking her. Her boyfriend insists on tongue kissing her and she is not into that. Her bra is back on. They turn her over. They finger fuck her from the back. They turn her over again. I'm thinking "chupe puta" means "suck it bitch" because the other guy says that a lot as he wags his dick in her face and forces her to blow him. Her rapist boyfriend is fucking her. The ropes around her wrists have disappeared but that damn bra is still on her.

Her rapist boyfriend reaches critical mass fucking her and moves up to her mouth, but then we do a shift and he's standing next to her with his shirt off and he squirts all over her face, which is just as well since she just spits it back out of her mouth anyway. She has forgotten that she is being raped because she lovingly licks and sucks his penis during this scene. Oh well.

The two guys get in a fight, because the blond congresswoman belongs to the rapist boyfriend and not the other guy. The other guy leaves and he is upset. He makes a phone call. Then it looks like the rapist boyfriend is in a jail cell, masturbating to memories of his rapes, then having sex with the blond congresswoman. In a conjugal visit. The end.

As a GIMP flick this movie is not all that bad. The girls are all attractive. There is one attempted rape and six girls are actually raped (in four separate scenes). The violence is low-key, but they are definitely nonconsensual sexual encounters. So even though there is not a lot of struggling, the rapes are fairly good. No bondage except the brief rope bondage near the end. No gags. Minimal suspense. It gets a C from me.

Wednesday, October 15th 2008 - 11:52:17 AM

Name: BigD

Hey Ralphus, thanx for emailing brutalviolence...

Damn, that sucks...No updates????....They just lost another subscriber then. Here's a tidbit for those who want the old stuff. Just subscribe to funnybdsm and most if not all of the good oldies are still on that site, they haven't removed them. Also, I found out that most of the same ones on are also on, so why did they even bring back It makes no sense!!

I like brutal comics too, so I've subscribed to drawing palace and torturedrawing before, pretty intense art there, although I don't think any of this crowd is into that....

I must be the only one here into the hardcore nonconsensual bdsm/rape stories and comics, but only from a fantasy standpoint of course...

Wednesday, October 15th 2008 - 05:50:35 PM

Name: Joe Wrappe
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

To the discussion on Whitman of HOM etc. I think some of his work is available on the Cal Star clip site: - sorry if that is redundant or if no one really care to know that.

Thank you Dan Hawke for all that history. I surely spent A LOT of time with The Experiment and Curiosity Excited the Kat and all those h.o.m. 8MM loops. Also that name "Geoffrey Merrick" he was supposed to be someone very famous - I read somewhere it was Whitman. That surely was wrong. I did love Merrick's little novels - they were killer.

Wednesday, October 15th 2008 - 10:50:19 PM

Name: Scheer
Homepage URL:

Bizarro Films Lest anyone get excited about the Japanese War Prisoner film at the top of the Bizarro lists, I bought it once on VCD four years ago and can say that it is a very tame, almost concensual film. The girl in it is lovely but she's acts like a doll - no reactions. The POW wears high heels for goodness sake! There's nothing threatening in this film

I've also seen 'Night Terror' which is a French film called 'Otages' (Hostages). It features two beautiful women and is OK but nowhere near as rough as Bizarro's text makes out.

John Galt Didn't you say somewhere that Bizarro rotate what films are available to members? That is, not all the films currently shown on the web pages are available in anyone month?

HOM, Whitman etc.. Whilst I can't contribute to the discussion I find it very interesting, appreciate everyone's posts on the subject, and encourage you all to continue to share your knowledge.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 12:56:30 AM

Name: A Canadian

Video Mayhem has announced the titles of the next ZFX releases on DVD. Funny, I have never heard of the first tilm, Specter.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 03:17:51 AM

Name: John Galt

Scheer: Yes, Bizarro Video does appear to rotate the films available. They consistently advertise "NOW 70 FILMS INSIDE!" and if they are adding one or two a week (which would increase their total monthly) they would surely change their banner if they weren't also dropping on the back end. My month with them is almost up, but I confess I did not think to record the names of available films a month ago to compare today. Oh well.

They also offer many of the downloadable films on DVD, but their site is so badly organized that you cannot easily search for the DVDs. They are arranged in categories and you have to manually move from page to page in each category and scroll through sometimes lengthy pages. They are not in alphabetical order. There is no search utility. It is quite annoying.

And to confuse the issue even more, they change the names of movies. Granted, many of the movies have foreign names or multiple titles based upon where they were released, but sometimes Bizarro Video seems to make up their own name. That makes it quite easy to watch (or buy) the same movie twice, which kind of puts me off.

I zipped through that latest Bizarro Video Japanese war film looking for a scene that caught my attention and I was unimpressed. It looked like they took time out from the brutal torture, abuse and rough sex (ha!) for a photo shoot toward the end. A bizarre turn of events that means I will go back and see how that came about but it looked extremely tame. I'll review it in the next day or so.

My experience so far is that very few of the Bizarro Video movies are as rough as its text suggests. Here is an example.


The Seduction of Amy (AKA Pantasmes and Once Upon A Virgin) (1975)

The Seduction of Amy starts with a bang. Young Amy is being chased through the woods by a guy who catches her, rips open her blouse and attempts to rape her until she whacks him in the head with a tree branch. Angry, he punches her in the face and she falls back unconscious into a lake. He panics and runs away.

Amy wakes up in a bed, dry, with her ripped blouse still showing one of her breasts. Makes you wonder about someone who rescues a rape victim but leaves her half naked in bed. Her rescuer is a guy with longish feathered 70s hair and a mustache that goes on forever. Also a white Romeo shirt with belled sleeves and open down to the middle of his hairy chest. (I had a red shirt like that back in the late 60s when I didn't know any better but I kept it buttoned up because I didn't have a hairy chest at 14.) So it is no surprise to hear that he has discovered a hidden manuscript from the Marquis de Sade describing a secret ceremony that, not surprisingly, Romeo wants to duplicate.

Following this revelation, Romeo has a standard XXX sex scene with some dark haired girl in the basement of his castle. Because yeah, he's living in a castle, probably the one in which the Marquis de Sade lived and in the basement of which the Marquis de Sade performed all sorts of unspeakable sex acts. We should be so lucky.

Romeo goes upstairs and discovers a random cute girl hitchhiker who just walked in and asked for a tour of his "chateau." He tells her he'll trade her a tour for a performance. She takes off her shirt. He decides she gets her tour. He asks to see her ballet performance and I am not surprised to hear she likes to perform in the nude, which she does. He also gives her the tour while she is nude. He invites her to spend the night and she accepts. Still in the nude, of course.

Amy is awakened by sounds of someone asking (kind of crying out but more sort of like moaning) for help. She lights a candle and goes looking for the source of the voice. A spooky candle-lit walking tour of the chateau follows. She discovers a naked girl chained AOH against a basement wall. She tells Amy to flee "before he comes back." Amy runs upstairs and finds Romeo who tells her she just had a nightmare and walks her back down and shows her no one is chained up downstairs.

The next morning, Amy runs into two more girls. They walk downstairs and find some more guys and girls sitting in the parlor. Everyone is wondering why Romeo (actually the character's name is Gideon) invited them. This is sounding like an Agatha Christie mystery. Or an Edgar Allen Poe short story. As if. The men and women pair off for some random XXX sex while awaiting Romeo. Amy watches everyone pairing off and having uninhibited sex and she is wondering what kind of guy Romeo could be if he has people in his chateau who just have random XXX sex. She is so disappointed, and runs off crying. Everyone else has random XXX sex. Fairly boring XXX sex, unfortunately, that goes on for quite a while.

Cut to two young girls who look like Heidi look-alikes walking along the lake shore. They walk into the chateau uninvited and are shocked to encounter the couples having random XXX sex. So one of them undresses the other one and pushes her into the orgy room. She flees back out and grabs her companion and bends her over her knee and pulls down her panties and spanks her bare butt. Everyone laughs. Next thing we know the dual Heidis are taking turns sucking a guy's cock. Next they straddle him, one being eaten out and the other riding his dick. The orgy continues.

Amy has wandered out to the lake shore and she is crying inconsolably. She gets back to the chateau and the door slams closed behind her! It is locked! She wakes up the orgy participants and they discover they are trapped! They wander around, looking for an exit, naked! Romeo strides in threateningly and apologizes because he cannot control his urges!

He retrieves the girl we saw chained naked to the wall and chains her up AOH in the middle of the chamber and she is whipped. It is not a bad whipping scene, although it doesn't last very long. Romeo asks the whipped girl forgiveness for torturing her, then asks Amy for help. Sucker that she is, she agrees.

Next thing, we are on a beach and Romeo wanders up the sand to find Amy waiting for him. They run toward each other, suddenly stark naked, and embrace and roll down the sand dune. They start having XXX sex in all sorts of positions. You just know that sand is getting everywhere and this all has to be quite uncomfortable. She explains how she's never sucked a cock before and she wants to suck his and she does. It is true love, and she understands his needs. She explains all of this in long expository monologues.

While I was watching this scene in the dunes off the cape and sipping on a pina colada that I made myself because every once in a while I like to make exotic frozen rum drinks, I was hearing Rupert Holmes singing "Escape (The Pina Colada Song)," but the lyrics were different:

If you like pina coladas, and getting caught in the rain,
If you like being tied up, if you're into some pain,
If you like being flogged at midnight, and being threatened with rape,
You're the love that I've looked for and I won't let you escape.

Yes, I am really that twisted. And you are never going to hear that song the same way again.

Fast forward one year. Romeo is telling another woman how happy he is with her visit since the death of his wife a year ago. Zoom in on the picture of his deceased wife. It is Amy. Fade out.

Not a great GIMP movie. First of all, Amy's "seduction" wasn't all that special. We didn't get to see Romeo in full de Sade mode. There were attractive women, and they were naked. But no torture. No rape. No threat. No violence. Two brief scenes where naked women are chained AOH. One brief but nice whipping scene, but I wouldn't waste time watching the movie, which I downloaded as a member of Bizarro Video. I would look for the scene on YouTied instead. This is a D.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 05:40:24 AM

Name: Sloth
E-mail address:

Mornin All

Regarding the recent poll question I seem to fall in along the lines of Falstaff - the best of those days hold up quite well as there was so much more time spent on storyline - further, the models of that age had at least minimal acting ability and were mostly natural, things rarely seen in today's flicks. The best of the Attackers series makes them pale but not much else. And hell yes, let's get Renee Baker in her prime doing it today.

John Galt - seen some of those you reviewed recently and concur with the low grades, especially "Horror Whore" - what a piece of crap that was to sit through.

Dan Hawke - you big teddy bear you - thanks so much for the "history section" you've added - perhaps we need a new links area especially for them. Been a Whitman fan forever.

Just ordered a couple films I was tipped off on here - Lamberto Bava's "The Torturer" and "Red Ridge" - get to quick rundowns on them when they come in.

Stay Well All

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 08:43:21 AM

Name: Thanagar

I would've been willing to bet serious money that I would never see the name "Rupert Holmes" on this forum, for any reason.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 09:59:43 AM

Name: R from CT

I ordered 2 videos from Videomayhem over three weeks ago. I sent an e-mail requesting a status update as to the expected shipping date but have heard nothing. His website says all shipped within 2 weeks. Are they always that slow?

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 11:17:09 AM

Name: John Galt

Thanagar: NO ONE expects my unexpected divergences! My greatest goal is to shock. Shock and surprise. Okay. My two greatest goals are to shock and surprise. And entertain. Hmm, okay. My three greatest goals are to shock and surprise and entertain. And educate. Damn! Okay, my four--you know what? Never mind. Let me repost and start all over again....


R From CT: Have you e-mailed VM? He will probably see your post here and respond, because he usually does. But an e-mail might also do the trick.


Scheer mentioned the Japanese War Prisoner movie just posted to Bizarro Video. Since I have a few days left on my membership, I downloaded and watched it. He was absolutely right that it is tame and almost consensual. But here is a more detailed review.


Japanese War Prisoner

The Bizarro Video featured download for October 15, 2008, Japanese War Prisoner, is more of an hour long video clip than a movie. What makes it "war" is basically that everyone is wearing camo-colored clothes. A not unattractive female Japanese prisoner is walked in at gunpoint. In addition to her camo top and pants, she is wearing heels, and several bright yellow bracelets on one wrist. Go figure.

There is a lot of dialog, during which she gives negative responses. Finally, about 6-1/2 minutes in, one of the guys starts pawing her and trying to run his hand down her camo pants. He pulls her arms behind her back and kind of swings her around and gropes her breasts. She resists minimally, but she resists.

Suddenly her wrists are fastened into leather cuffs over her head. We didn't see that happen. Just one second she was being groped and the next her wrists were over her head. The boss guy feels her up through her clothes, then slides his hands into her top and squeezes her breasts. He undoes the buttons on her camo pants to reveal white lacy panties. He lifts up her camo shirt to reveal a bright yellow swimsuit top, which matches her bracelets. More pawing ensues.

There is a pause in the action during which the two guys maintain a repetitive sounding dialog. Then they pull her pants down and leave them bunched around her ankles. The camera makes a slow tour of her body. Next, the boss guy cuts her top, but not all the way off. Then he pulls her swimsuit top up to expose her breasts and proceeds to squeeze and generally play with them. He runs his hand down into her panties occasionally, then finally just pulls her panties all the way down to her ankles.

The boss guy kneels in front of her and strokes her pussy. Then he turns her around and spreads her cheeks enough for the camera to zoom in on her sex.

Suddenly she is seated in a chair. This movie doesn't waste much time with traditional scene transitions. Her torn top is still over her shoulders, but not covering up her breasts. Her yellow swimsuit top is still pulled up over the top of her breasts. She is still wearing the yellow bracelets. She is not tied to the chair or bound in any way. She is just sitting there, letting this guy spread her knees apart and spread her pussy lips apart and generally play with her sex. You know, she really should be restrained, and she should be trying to escape. She is not even making victim noises. She's just sort of going with the flow, like having a strange guy poke and prod her between the legs is something that happens frequently.

Next scene change, she has her hands behind her back (not tied or secured--she is just kind of holding them back there to give the illusion of bondage) while the guy finger fucks her. Then he pushes a nice chrome speculum into her and screws it open and then sticks his finger into the speculum. He wiggles his finger around inside her and is apparently stimulating something because she actually responds by twitching her thigh and audibly gasping.

Next, he inserts a bright pink "Hello Kitty" vibrator into the speculum (and therefore into her), and moves it in and out. (Okay, I'm just kidding about the "Hello Kitty" part. It might have been "Mary Kay.") I can't tell if her reaction--and she does react--is because it is vibrating her or just going deep enough to hurt her. In my fantasy, it is both. That doesn't last too long, and we never get to see her face while she is being violated with the pink vibrator, so we don't actually know what her responses are. That is a missed opportunity in my opinion.

Out comes an orangish three-pronged dildo looking thing. First they rub it between her breasts. Then the second guy holds the girl's ankles apart and up in the air (she is still wearing her heels) while the boss guy fucks her with the orange dildo. It is a mechanical dildo, so it rotates in a small circular motion. He moves it in and out a few times.

They make her stand up and walk around with the gyrating dildo still inside of her. They make her squat down, still with the dildo doing its thing inside of her, and the second guy makes her fellate him. She does a good job blowing him. You would never know she is being forced to do it against her will. Which kind of spoils the scene for me. Suddenly he is fucking her while she is standing bent over with the boss guy kind of supporting her. The guy tries to fuck her hard and she tries to respond, but it could easily be normal sex response instead of brutal rape response. This goes on for several minutes.

Next up, the second guy is sitting on the chair and she backs up and lowers herself onto his cock. No apparent force or coercion is used to get her to do this. It's hard to remember she is supposed to be a prisoner who is being raped. Quick change of scene as she is now on her back on a table with her legs up and apart as the second guy arranges himself on the table in order to fuck her. Her heels are finally gone, as we see her bare feet bouncing in the air as he pumps into her. The guy loudly reaches climax and squirts onto her breasts.

That is the end of the movie. My copy suddenly starts a "behind the scenes" sequence at the 42 minute mark where we see the girl's hair being arranged just so. Oddly, she is wearing pink slippers in these scenes. Pictures are taken as she raises her shirt to expose her breasts, and has her pants undone and pulled open enough to show the beginning of her pubic patch. Her breasts are very attractive and look 100% natural, by the way. She has a nice body. Large breasts, small waist, dramatic flair of the hips, shapely legs, pretty feet. She would have looked awesome in strict bondage. She is not wearing the yellow swimsuit top in this scene. I wonder why they added it?

More pictures of her posing with the machine gun, with her breasts exposed, primarily because the old camo top has been replaced by a new camo top that ends above her breasts. Publicity stills for the NRA crowd, I guess. Why, she could run for vice president on the Republican ticket based on these shots. No, wait, I spoke too soon. Now she's posing bottomless, on some stairs, with one leg on a higher step so that she's a bit exposed, you know, down there, holding that machine gun, with her breasts fully exposed, and in black platform heels.

Outtakes from the guy-sitting-in-the-chair sex scene. Outtakes from her being fucked on her back on the table culminating in the guy squirting onto her chest. The end. The real end.

This is basically a 40-minute rape video clip. The girl is attractive and she has an incredible body. But there is no violence or threat. No torture. No gags. All-too-brief AOH bondage. It would have been much better if the actress had pretended she was being raped. As it was, she demonstrated some half-hearted reluctance. The video quality was very good, though. So I will give this a qualified C-. If you don't need a good dose of violence and forced nonconsensuality in your rape scenes, this would probably be an okay clip.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 12:41:27 PM

Name: R from CT


I did email Videomayhem, see my prior post. No response yet.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 01:38:22 PM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: Dang, you must have the fastest keyboard in the West. I don't order from Bizarro Video so I mostly read the review of Japanese War Prisoner out of curiosity. I think I can safely conclude I'm not missing anything. Thanks for another entertaining and informative review.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 05:15:44 PM

Name: John Galt

Sorry 'bout that R from CT. So you said. Hmm. I have not ordered from VM myself, but lots of GIMPers have with apparent satisfaction. He does generally respond to posts on this forum, though. At least he has since I've been active. So we'll see.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 05:31:10 PM

Name: VM
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

R from CT- You're all set. Generally orders go out quickly unless they include titles ordered from Europe.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 07:09:11 PM

Name: Mike from Brooklyn

Hey R from CT and John Galt

I too have ordered some videos from Video Mayhem about two weeks ago and have not heard anything yet.

This is kinda strange, because I have ordered from VM in the past and have always received my order within two weeks.

Sometimes I have gotten my order within three days,

The one time that my order took four weeks, Larry was quite apologetic and threw me a free video to compensate my wait.

This is not like him, but I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and to sit tight.

Just thought I would offer my 2 cents.

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 07:09:49 PM

Name: JoeX


Looking at the new ZFX titles at Video Mayhem that a Canadian linked to earlier today, they are all $34 except for Video Pirates 3 which is $12. Is that a mistake? If not, why the difference?

Joe X

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 07:32:38 PM

Name: VM
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Mike From Brooklyn- Drop me an email with your name or customer ID# and I will see it goes out tomorrow.

Joe X: thanks very much for that post! I pay far more then 12.00 just to get ZFX titles!

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 08:29:46 PM

Name: JoeX


Looking at the new ZFX titles at Video Mayhem that a Canadian linked to earlier today, they are all $34 except for Video Pirates 3 which is $12. Is that a mistake? If not, why the difference?

Joe X

Thursday, October 16th 2008 - 07:29:38 PM

Name: VM
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Any suggestions/comments to this post are welcome. Also you can email me directly. Recently my webmaster Archie passed away and I was forced to hire a new one. Things went well until early in September he double charged 2 customers. Simple matter of having the webmaster do a refund. It turned out to be anything but simple.

When he manually went to refund the $36.00 he left out the decimal point and refunded the customer $3600.00 To shorten this part it took many calls to processor and bank and customer as processor was unable to refund it. The $3600.00 went on his credit card- he was unable to use it as it was way above his credit limit. Looks like after over a month the end of this part of the story may be over as check is supposed to be here tomorrow.

Meantime I make couple calls to my credit card processor and they take a quick look at my website and next day my merchant account is shut down after 3 years of processing.

So, I pursue getting another merchant account. First off I will need to pay Visa/MC $750.00. I already paid that fee once. Next I find out the discount rate (rate charged by bank) will at least triple. Per transactions charge will triple also. From here it gets worse.

They will take a percentage of money every month for 6 months. This will amount to over $3000.00

I've got a snowballs chance in hell of ever seeing a dime of this money as it will be held conveniently in my merchant bank in Australia. I of course will not know the name or address of the bank. Closest I get to the bank is my processor- which of course is in the United Kingdom. This does help out Visa/MC as they get a bigger cut from my sales then they have been getting.

At this point I'm contemplating going back to checks/money orders. Comments are welcome. email address is at top of page.

Friday, October 17th 2008 - 12:38:44 AM

Name: Brutus

John Galt: I nearly laughed out my drink on my keyboard reading your review of the "Seduction of Amy." Hilarious stuff there. I'm also gonna mimic A Canadian here and say I probably wouldn't be missing much by skipping "Japanese War Prisoner." Great reading material though.

Sloth: I haven't seen "Red Ridge" yet, but I can safely say that "The Torturer" has a number of really fine and nasty GIMP scenes. (I liked the wheelchair scene the most.) I'd like to hear your take on the movie.

Speaking of mainstream movies, I see Asian Cult Cinema has a version of BTK that was not released in the U.S. I haven't even seen the cut version yet. From the stills, it looks like a real gritty film with a lot of GIMP potential.

VM: I don't have a solution to your problem, but I gotta say that it's downright criminal what the credit card companies are doing to the industry. I personally haven't used a money order for porn since the 1990s, when I ordered some Lord Farris and Brian Tarsis comics through a Heavy Metal magazine. Although I don't buy nearly as much porn as I once did, I'm so used to the convenience of credit cards now that I'd likely be reluctant to go to the trouble of using a check or money order. Just my selfish 2 cents.

Friday, October 17th 2008 - 09:34:52 AM

Name: Sloth
E-mail address:

Mornin All

VM - so not only did you get screwed by Wall St. and D.C. politicians with the market and credit fiasco, now the card companies intend to get their pound of flesh as well - for what it's worth it would not bother me at all if you returned to a check/money order/cashier's check form of business - whatever you need to do to hold pricing and still make a profit to stay in business is the way it should be - I wish you well and whatever you decide just let us know and I remain your devoted customer :).

Stay Well All

Friday, October 17th 2008 - 09:43:29 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

As someone who lives outside the U.S., I have already had to use money orders for any purchases from Video Mayhem.

It hasn't happened yet, but in the event a bank teller were to ever ask, "what is Video Mayhem?", my plan is to say it's a company that sells difficult-to-find horror movies. That's a somewhat true answer, isn't it?

Friday, October 17th 2008 - 10:30:04 AM

Name: John Galt

There's a very good reason that universities have a separate course entitled "Business Ethics." It is because real, actual ethics do not apply in the business world. And, unfortunately, organizations and nations built on capitalism--such as the US--are beginning to forego ethical behavior for "business ethical" behavior, which is basically as long as it is profitable it is okay and completely acceptable. At least, to the one making the profits. And who cares about the rest, who are all just a bunch of losers? < /sarcasm >

Friday, October 17th 2008 - 01:14:39 PM

Name: VM
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Have decided to go with the checks/MO orders plan. They can be made out simply to VM...a little more discreet. Any questions feel free to contact me, thanks.

Friday, October 17th 2008 - 06:37:07 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

VM: Sorry to hear about the unfortunate series of events that led to you losing your merchant account. The amazing thing to me is how you managed to stay afloat using credit cards for the past several years. Pretty much every adult webmaster has been hit in one way or another by this wave of censorship that has swept through the industry at the hands of this Republican administration. George Bush and company are in bed with the Religious Right and since they knew they couldn't get rid of porn legally, they decided to make it as difficult as possible for anyone to sell it.

Among other illegal things they've done was to intentionally put pressure on the financial institutions to not accept revenue from adult businesses. Today you'd be hard-pressed to find even one US-based financial institution that will accept business from adult vendors. You think the credit card companies really wanted to lose all that income? Trust me, they were forced into it, and no one is allowed to say a word why, but we all know the reason.

And with the nation nearing a recession (or already there), they are willingly allowing literally billions of dollars that could be helping this country and giving it to foreign countries instead. And porn is recession-proof; it's a consumable entity, not all that different from grocery stores selling milk. It's a staple; people will always come back for more. Once again, we're talking BILLIONS of dollars leaving this country, all because a certain administration doesn't like porn. Think they would still need that $700 billion buyout if they had left things the way they were? It's pretty disgusting.

The good thing is we'll finally be rid of the Republicans come early next year, but I don't think President Obama's itinerary will be to use porn revenue as part of his plan to fix the economy. It's doubtful, though, that he'll be wasting more of our tax dollars going after more needless prosecutions of the producers, so that's a step in the right direction.

I would suggest that you check with other companies that carry adult product and see how they're doing it. Natasha Flade got around it (of course, she's a lawyer in real life). Gary Roberts got hit hard but he found someone else. So did Steve at Powershotz. It can be done; it's just a matter of how much more you're willing to spend to stick around as an online merchant. Personally I think you have to use credit cards if you're going to be successful online. Good luck; I'll support you any way I can.


John Galt: I see you're back whipping out new reviews, and in the process keeping me busy updating the Reviews section nearly every time you post. In each case my guess is that reading your review was probably more entertaining than watching the actual movie, although time-wise, it's probably about even. And damn you...DAMN YOU...for making me get that awful Rupert Holmes song stuck in my head. Oh, I suppose it could have been worse. It could have been Christopher Cross or Hall and Oates but this was bad enough. I need to put on some Mozart to clear my senses.

The direct links for your latest reviews are Brutal Love Prison (filed under Rape Videos), The Seduction of Amy (Classic Adult) and Japanese War Prisoner (Japanese).


Hey, anybody seen the trailer for Copy Cat The Masked Venetian on YouTied? The direct page for the movie they're selling is in my Homepage URL. It looks pretty exciting, although the few other trailers they have on their site look like just vanilla bondage videos, without even any nudity. Of course, this trailer doesn't have it either, but it certainly implies that something bad sexually may happen to the gorgeous woman in the film. It's 40 minutes long and only $20.99...think it's worth checking out?

Friday, October 17th 2008 - 07:54:12 PM

Name: zee-ef-ex
Homepage URL:

You guys were right about the Morgan Marsh "Jail or Slavery" DVD being Society SM, of course, and not Sex & Submission - my bad. I just don't pay as much attention as I should to who the company is. Still was a pleasant surprise to see a DVD of that caliber in my local store.

Ralphus, you asked why the long hiatus between reviews for me. I don't buy online, only from my local store. I think they have been scared by the chilling effects of the Republi-taliban Grand Oil Party the past few years and it's rare they stock BDSM flix. I would post more reviews if only I could see more full-length movie porn.

On the Golden Age poll, most of those old movies really pale nowadays in comparison to the brighter, better filming and cuter girls in porn today. Some of the really creative ones hold up well - Barbara Broadcast, or Behind the Green Door, say. Others like Debbie Does Dallas, which I LOVED when it first came out, are now only so-so. I miss Selena, Constance Money's beauty - and remember this one? -- Kristara Barrington? She was always up for a good hardcore bondage rape scene. Too bad most of those movies are now lost in the mists of time.

Nowadays most of the porn I see is just free samples on the web. I am getting more and more into the amateur stuff - sorry, producers who post here. See my link for a dynamite long scene. Knowing the sexual conservatism of so many women, it has always amazed me when a woman does amazingly overt things on camera for the world to see. But usually it is more fathomable because you know they're getting paid pretty good money in return.

But check out this clip. What goes through a woman's mind on the question of, hmmm, should she strip naked, be tied up, be gagged, be fucked brutally in pussy-to-ass-to-mouth action, and be filmed doing so in order that potentially millions of people around the world can watch it ... and she's not doing it for the money, but just for kicks? Wow, where do you meet women like that? Thinking of it in that context, that this woman does the things on this clip as a non-paid or little paid amateur, blows my mind and increases its sexual power. Maybe some day an amateur porn poll question would be apt.

Oh and hey if anyone has links to clips on par with this one, please oh please share.

John Galt, Dan Hawke and others, in your reviews and comments you often focus on whether the girl really seems to be "feeling it" or not - is she really being affected by what is happening? Or is she just going through the motions waiting for her paycheck? One of the tipping points for a woman usually seems to be anal sex. They may be able to fake an orgasm, but it's hard to fake the reactions she has when she is getting fucked in the ass. But the girl in this clip takes it over the top - I love the reactions this girl has. The ass fucking REALLY seems to be getting to her. And I love at the end how she sucks the cock which just left her ass so adamently. It's like she's thinking, quick, hurry up and cum in my mouth, there's no way I want that thing in my ass again!

Seriously, check out the clip, one of the best I've ever seen on the web. zee-ef-ex

Friday, October 17th 2008 - 10:13:18 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

zee-ef-ex wrote:

Kristara Barrington? She was always up for a good hardcore bondage rape scene. Too bad most of those movies are now lost in the mists of time.

Boy, I sure do remember Kristara Barrington, but I never saw any of the bondgage rape scenes zee-ef-ex has mentioned. If anyone knows of any specific titles that showed Kristara in a rape scene, please let me know. If you know where the movie can be found (hopefully on DVD), even better.

Saturday, October 18th 2008 - 04:46:41 AM

Name: John Galt

Ralphus: That Copycat the Masked Venetian link didn't work. Wonder if it was removed?

About the Angelique picture. *sigh* When I was in my late teens, I read the entire series of Angelique books--at least the ones translated into English--all based on the hot sexy cover art of the paperbacks. (I knew but didn't care that they were classified generally as "romance" novels.) "Angelique in Barbary" was one of the hotter covers, suggestive as it was of whipping and rape.

A Canadian: Kristara Barrington flew completely below my radar. I looked her up and saw that she was in Jailhouse Girls, with Ginger Lynn. I saw that movie but all I remember is Ginger Lynn. I also found a comment in a Kristara Barrington filmography that indicated she was in "a kinky, rough scene with a rape theme" in that flick, which I also don't recall. For what it's worth.


In an earlier post I agreed that the descriptions of Bizarro Video offerings are often described as being rougher than they actually are. Sometimes everything about them is misleading, such as was the case with this flick.


Young Girls For Sale (AKA Jeunes Filles a Vendre) (1983)

Well, Young Girls For Sale gets off to an unusual start. It is in French, but that's not the unusual part. We are on a stretch of beach. One guy is standing naked while a naked girl fellates him. A fellow who looks a bit like a younger and slimmer Jay Leno brings a beer bottle from the car. The girl lays down on her back with her legs apart and the naked guy uses her pussy as a bottle opener. We even get the "pop" sound as the top pops off. Oddly enough, no liquid spills out even though she is on her back and the bottle is fully sideways. Jay Leno gets a second bottle and opens his the same way. He drinks. The naked guy gets down and fucks the girl. He cries out. Whoops. Jay Leno forgot to remove the bottle cap, which he does next. The girl turns over and presents herself on hands and knees and the naked guy fucks her doggie style. Jay Leno produces a large spoon and holds it over the girl's back for the naked guy to come in. He does, and the girl laps it from the spoon. Then the guy licks it. Then the girl and guy walk away and Jay Leno licks it clean. Eew.

After the titles, we see a blond girl sunbathing in a bikini. Jay Leno walks up and stands looking at her. She stands up. Words are exchanged. He slaps her twice. He stalks away, but a smarmy Young Republican type in a suit (who wears a suit at the swimming pool?) calls him over and puts some kind of drug in a pineapple drink and Jay goes back and gives it to the blond bikini girl. She drinks it and falls asleep. That went absolutely nowhere. A roofie without a rape is like a day without sunshine.

The Young Republican drives Jay Leno to another location where they happen upon a girl who lets Jay undress her. She lays down on a blanket and masturbates briefly before Jay fucks her in a variety of positions. This is XXX sex, by the way. The Young Republican stands and watches (probably thinking, "fucking Democrats").

There are plot developments, but everyone is speaking French. Money changes hands. A video is watched, in which a black girl touches herself, undresses, writhes around on a bed, masturbates, and generally seems to have a great time. Suddenly she is giving a hand job to a Caucasian penis, and then before you know it she is being fucked in several positions. She looks right at the camera and smiles the whole time. The guys watching the video smile knowingly at each other.

An ambulance pulls up to a clinic. An unconscious young blond girl is unloaded on a stretcher. A male doctor feels her up. She is put to bed.

French dialog between Jay Leno and the blond bikini girl from the pool, who I think is a nurse. Possibly they are in his apartment. He shows her the money he has. They have XXX sex doggie style. It might be painful. She has kind of a pained expression and reaches back to grasp his hand in a nonverbal "not so hard" way, but he keeps pounding away at her. Good for him. He pulls out and comes on her back. She turns over and they do some borderline gross tonguing.

We return to the young blond girl in the clinic. The doctor who felt her up gives her an injection. Jay Leno and the blond nurse he just screwed are at the clinic as well. They enter the girl's room. She is unconscious. Jay pushes up her gown and looks at her breasts. They leave. The doctor who felt her up returns. He pushes up her gown to reveal her entire naked body. He lubricates her pussy, puts on a condom, spreads her legs, and fucks her while she is unconscious. Personally, I prefer responsive, fighting rape victims to unconscious ones.

Back in the clinic, we find some dark-haired guy in a black suit sitting outside a room, guarding it. He gets up and enters the room. A curly haired girl is in bed. They speak to each other, and he pulls her sheet down to expose her naked body. He takes out a pair of handcuffs and cuffs one wrist to the headboard. I would have cuffed both wrists through one of the headboard bars, so she was AOH. But oh well.

He runs his hand over her naked body, strokes her pussy until she takes over and works herself up. He takes his penis out and she briefly sucks his cock before he fucks her. It is a vigorous bondage XXX sex scene, but completely consensual.

Back to the young blond girl in the clinic. Jay Leno comes in and talks to her. The blond nurse comes in and talks to her. I have no clue what is going on. This is all very subtle white slavery if that's what this is all about.

Back to the doctor who raped the unconscious young blond girl. A dark-haired woman walks into his office and undresses for him. He walks her over to a hospital bed and she gets on it on all fours. He lubes up an enema tube, inserts it into her ass, and fills her up with a pitcher of something, all the while moving the tube back and forth in a fucking motion. They talk. He kneels behind her and fucks her from behind. I can't tell if he's fucking her pussy or her ass. But he is doing it with vigor.

Jay Leno is outside walking with the young blond girl. They talk. They kiss. The blond nurse sees them and looks jealous, or something. It is a Meaningful Expression, whatever it means. Jay comes walking back alone, and a dark-haired nurse comes out and takes his hands and presses them against her breasts. Her meaning is clear. They go running inside, hand-in-hand, and next thing they are fucking like bunnies. She is on her hands and knees and he's doing her from the back, which seems to be the preferred sex position in this film. The dark haired doctor pokes his head into the room and watches them fuck.

The blond nurse confronts Jay Leno. They argue. He pushes her aside and walks out. She throws a lamp at the closed door. Jay Leno drives off with the young blond.

More French dialog between the dark-haired doctor and some new guy. The dark-haired nurse eavesdrops at the door, then goes back and has a discussion with the blond nurse. She flashes back on Jay Leno kissing the young blond, which produces glycerin tears. The dark haired nurse removes her skirt and orders the blond nurse to lick her pussy, which she does. After a lengthy session of carpet munching, they start tongue kissing. We shift to the beach, where Jay Leno is fucking the young blond girl, on her back in this instance.

Ah-hah. Maybe we are finally getting to the young girls for sale part. A dark room. Older rich looking guys sitting around in easy chairs. A girl with dark curly hair wearing only a bikini bottom and a fairly unattractive nose walks in and poses in front of each guy, then walks to the side of the room. Next, another guy brings in another girl, leading her by a chain attached to her bound wrists because she seems reluctant and embarrassed. She is also wearing only a bikini bottom. They seem to like the reluctant embarrassed girl. Of course.

So what happens is this. The dark haired girl gives them hand jobs and does some sucking to get them hard. Then the reluctant girl is wheeled into the room on a gurney, naked, with her hands still bound in front of her. A butler (or something) lifts and spreads her legs, and one of the guys walks up and starts fucking her. She is not fighting him tooth and nail, but you can tell she is not happy about being fucked. The other guy makes her give him a hand job. Meanwhile, still another guy is fucking the other girl doggie style across the room. All XXX sex.

Quick cut to Jay Leno and the young blond embracing in front of a sunset. They kiss. Fade to Fin.

Well, I don't know about you but I was expecting to see innocent young girls being kidnapped, abused, raped and sold to perverts who performed unspeakably nasty sexual perversions on their supple young bodies. So I was some kind of disappointed. Young Girls For Sale my ass. But I'll give credit where credit is due. There was the one unconscious rape scene with the young blond in the clinic. There was the handcuffed sex scene, which counts as bondage sex but was far too consensual to qualify as a rape. There was the wrist bondage and mostly tame rape scene of the young girl at the very end. However, she wasn't screaming in pain or anything, so it was unsatisfying as rape scenes go. That was it. There was some other vigorous XXX sex, but it was all consensual. For the two kind of rape scenes and the bondage sex scene, I'll go with a C-.

I downloaded this from Bizarro Video. Usually, you can also purchase Bizarro Video downloads on DVD, but I couldn't find this one in any of the categories. No great loss.

Saturday, October 18th 2008 - 06:59:06 AM

Name: Bill Zebub
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

I am actively editing "BREAKING HER WILL." For those of you who will take a chance on it, I hope that you enjoy it as a movie. I had wanted to have this done in time to present to Jack Ketchum, but I guess I will just have to see him at a future horror convention. (He's the guy who wrote "The Girl Next Door."

It's just weird to have made such an extreme movie, as far as marketing goes. No vendor who has seen the pictures is willing to believe that this is a sort of thriller. It's interesting that a character can go around hacking dozens of people and still get mainstream distribution, but a character who makes a sex slave out of a hitch hiker gets dismissed as torture porn (even when the STORY is the most important part).

I also noticed some peculiar behavior at a horror convention in MA. Horror fans who saw scantily-clad girls on my DVD's stopped themselves in their tracks, yelled "smut!" and walked away. I occasionally get that reaction all over the country, but it was a very common reaction in MA. Very strange. I know that some of the most oppressive laws were written in that area.

It's rather baffling to me how a horror fan actually gets turned off by nudity.

Saturday, October 18th 2008 - 09:05:25 AM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: Thanks for the tip. At this point, I don't see any evidence that Jailhouse Girls is available on DVD, although I did find this plot setup with Ginger Lynn and Paul Thomas on YouTube. I will keep looking, though.

Bill Zebub: I don't understand the reaction you got at that horror convention. Personally, I don't want to watch a horror movie that doesn't have some nudity in it. I wonder if parts of America are experiencing some kind of backlash to "torture porn," with self-proclaimed horror purists dumping on anything that isn't horror the way they want to see it. Sort of like the comments some of us get on YouTied from the vanilla bondage crowd.

Saturday, October 18th 2008 - 11:05:50 AM

Name: Scribbler

zee-ef-ex: the porn industry does most of the amateur porn you see. She got paid. Amateur is a porn niche that's intended to look homemade or low budget, but not that the talent doesn't get paid.

Saturday, October 18th 2008 - 03:34:25 PM

Name: John Galt

A Canadian: I saw that clip and almost linked to it when I posted, but it only showed Ginger Lynn so I refrained. Ginger Lynn was so hot. Isn't that the movie where she is kind of raped in the back of the police van after her arrest? Ginger Lynn could have done a LOT more rape scenes and I wouldn't have complained a bit.


Bill Zebub: I also cannot understand the nimrods who cried "smut." I always want nudity in my horror movies. In fact I am sorely disappointed when there is none and the paucity of nudity in horror movies over the last decade has kind of diminished my interest in the genre.


Well, I am going through the Bizarro Video flicks slowly but surely. This one kind of surprised me in a good way.


Hot Summer in the City (1976)

I was encouraged when Hot Summer in the City started and the background music was "Summer in the City," by the Lovin' Spoonful. We are introduced to our young blond protagonist, Debby, who is being driven home by her boyfriend, who tries to slip his hand up her skirt while they are kissing good night but she says no, let's wait until we're married and he reluctantly agrees. He tells her he'll pick her up in the morning to go to Sunday School. She might as well have INNOCENT VIRGIN stamped on her forehead. As she walks to the house, the background music changes to the Doors' "Light My Fire."

Debby is played by Lisa Baker, by the way, who was Playboy's Playmate of the Year for 1967. She kind of has that Britney Spears wholesome blond innocent look that morphs so easily into that fat trailer trash look before you know it. But she's still very early Britney looking in this movie, which, according to IMDB, was her only movie. Quentin Tarantino loves this movie as well, by the way.

Anyway, Debby goes in the house and finds her naked mother in a menage a trois with two naked guys, one of whom is porking her while she is sucking the other one off. Shocked and disgusted, she runs out of the house, into the woods and down a road on which horny black dudes drive. Sure enough, four of those evil horny black dudes who crave young white girls and will rape them any chance they get--the ones the Republicans are always warning you about--drive by and decide to grab her. She flees, and makes it into the front yard of a house, where she stumbles and screams as they descend upon her. The porch light comes on and out steps middle-aged white Joe American, who takes one look and goes back inside and turns his porch light back off. Guess he figured the little tramp was getting what she deserved or something.

The black guys wrestle her into the back seat of the car and hold her down as she struggles. The background music is "Leader of the Pack." They imbibe evil spirit liquor directly from the bottle, and force her to drink some. I expect they will light up reefers any minute now.

The horniest black dude just can't wait, he's got to fuck the bitch now. (A reefer would have probably taken the edge off.) So he fights to undress her, and she is not cooperating. We get shots of a black hand squeezing a white breast as the two guys in the back seat attempt to strip her. They get her dress pushed up. They get her panties pulled down. They get her bent over. She is not making a sound this entire time, by the way, but when the black dude penetrates her she says "no please stop." The black dude observes that she sure is tight and his black dude rapist accomplice wonders if she is a virgin. Her deflowering certainly didn't pain her enough to scream. Bummer. The music is now Diana Ross singing "The Happening." That's kind of funny. Whoever did the soundtrack on this flick has a wicked sense of humor.

We get some XXX sex, as we watching a black cock move in and out of a very white (well, okay then light pink) pussy. When he comes on her back, it is the standard white semen, though.

They arrive at a remote cabin and walk the girl in. Debby seems sullen, more like she's pissed she didn't get a kiss than she's just been bent over and raped in the back seat of a car. She stands there as the black dudes engage in a difficult to translate ebonics conversation, but the gist of it is "the man" is coming down and they need to raise more money for "civil rights" and other "good causes." Just so you know evil horny black dudes who love to rape young white girls are the driving force behind civil rights. Republicans already knew that, of course, but the rest of the nation was obstinately denying it, the blind fools.

The head black dude (the one who raped her) decides Debby will "take care of them" and slaps her. Next thing she is cooking for them. With her dress top still pulled open to reveal her bare breasts. Right. I was expecting her to cook them fried chicken, but it looked more like pork chops. Maybe fried chicken is on the menu for tomorrow night.

Head black dude decides she's "his chick." The others don't think that's fair. So head black dude says they can play poker and anyone who wins his $50 from him can fuck her as long as they give him his $50 back. They turn on the radio and reject a few stations, looking for some "funky shit," which they finally find on a station playing "Sugar Pie Honey Bunch." It just doesn't get much funky shittier than The Temptations. They deal the cards.

The head black dude bets it all on three queens, but another guy has three kings, so he's gonna get him some honky pussy tonight! Oo-wee! Head black dude is philosophical about losing, saying they'll have all the honky pussy they want once they "take over." The Beach Boys start singing "Good Vibrations." The winner black dude lifts up Debby's dress and tells her she sure has a nice looking pussy there. I personally don't know how he can tell because what she really has is a huge dark 70s bush. She could have WMDs secreted down there and no one would know.

So winner black dude pushes her onto the bed and she kind of struggles. Apparently, he wants no struggling, so he enlists the aid of the other two black dudes. One pulls her arms up over her head and pins them to the bed. The other one fumbles with her legs. She doesn't cooperate enough, so he decides to whip her with his belt. They wrap her in a blanket so as not to mark her (head black dude said he could do anything but he couldn't mark her) and he whales away on her. She fake screams "you're killing me!"--a line she should have saved for when he violated her with his huge black cock. I can't believe they missed that stereotype in this flick.

She pleads that she tried to help. She marched and everything. Yes, but she didn't sleep with any black dude who wanted her, so I guess that doesn't count. Poor misguided white liberal girl! Now you'll pay the price for your liberalism! While he's whacking away at her with the belt, the Beach Boys song ends and the DJ proclaims, "As the hits just keep on coming!" That is so warped. I love this sound guy.

The girl makes fake pained sounds and finally says "fuck me fuck me anything I can't stand it" or words to that effect. She didn't say the words with any enthusiasm, though, so I think I would have kept on with the belt until she screamed with some conviction. But that's just me. And I'm not a radical black dude. I'm going to vote for a guy for president who once spoke to a black dude who is a community leader and a university professor but was once a radical black dude back in the 60s, though. But that's not the same thing.

He stops and admires his handiwork (red marks that will fade) and then declares, "I'm gonna fill that little belly of hers with black power 'til it comes out her ears." I am not making this up. He goes on to say, "'Ol shortie's gonna bake his bread in that oven all night long," and employs other clever metaphors to describe fucking her, several of which I had never heard before. Thank god.

The two flunky black dudes strip Debby while winner black dude undresses. He tells her to look at his big black cock and asks if she likes it. She says yes. The Turtles are singing "some girls like to run around" in the background. While one of the flunkies holds her hands, he gets on the bed behind her and tells her to get up on her knees.

The next part could almost be a comedy bit if raping girls was all that funny. Head black dude kisses or licks her back. She whimpers. Black flunky number one gets up on the bed at her head and pulls up her head and mashes her face into his crotch. Black flunky number two, who I suspect is retarded in some respect, sticks his finger up her ass and shouts about how excited he is because he's got his finger up her ass. Winner black dude pulls his finger out and pushes him away, all while trying to line his cock up with her pussy. Finally we get the two remaining black dudes rocking back and forth, with the guy in back talking about how tight her pussy is and commenting about her mouth. As far as we know, the guy in front hasn't taken his cock out and forced her to blow him, though. Apparently they figured that out in editing after the fact, so they went back and shot inserts where she is sucking his cock in close-up but he's using her hair to mash her face forcibly into his crotch in the long shot. It's kind of sloppy direction.

The radio is now playing "Everlasting Love," by one-hit wonder Robert Knight. Meanwhile, largely non-explicit XXX sex follows. Black flunky number two (the retarded one with the lazy eye) is sitting off to the side spanking his monkey. Black flunky number one does not have a huge black cock, what of it we can see. We don't see any actual penetration. The director has a bit to learn about filming XXX features. Flunky number one comes on Debby's cheek. Winner black dude comes on Debby's back. Flunky number two comes on his hand. It is all the standard white semen, though, instead of the promised black power. Black flunky number two attempts to fuck Debby, but winner black dude stops him because head black dude said he couldn't.

It is the next day. The plot develops. A rich fat white guy who looks suspiciously Jewish (or maybe Italian) arrives with the money from "the man" and the plan to start a race riot too big for "the fuzz" to handle. They even have snipers set of to pick off the "pigs" and the firemen. Head black dude is upset because some "brothers" might get hurt but fat white cat says hey that's what he's getting paid to do.

The fat white money man also brought along head black dude's girlfriend, who is none too happy to see the honky bitch and gets all territorial. Head black dude tells her he's going to fuck the honky bitch tonight. Girlfriend attacks Debby. Head black dude pulls her off, slaps her to put her in her place, and tells black flunky number two (the retarded one) that he can have her. She says "no no not him!" but lazy eye is on her like stink on shit. Serves the bitch right. He wrestles around with her, exposes her breasts, pulls off her panties, then she just kind of settles down on the floor on her back while he fucks her. We see some penetration this time. He comes on her belly. (White semen again.)

She threatens to "get" Debby. Head black dude tells black flunky number one it is his turn. He grabs girlfriend and pulls her onto the bed. Strips off her clothes completely, fingers her, pinches her breasts (and she actually says "ow!" with some enthusiasm) kisses or licks her breasts, and tells her he ain't gonna put his dick where black flunky number two did, so she's gonna suck him. Suck him 'til it comes out her ears. He pulls her up off the bed and turns her around for the camera so that we get to see her whole body, which is not all that bad if you ignore the hickies and bruises. Then he pushes her down to her knees and forcibly urges her to begin performing fellatio.

Cut to upstairs, where head black dude has taken Debby. There's a tender moment as he feels her up and then carefully undresses her. He undresses himself. This is going to be so consensual, I can tell right now. Debby is a helpless slave to the Black Cock. She can't help herself. He kisses her. There's tongue action and she reaches up and puts her arm around him. Cut to downstairs, where there's a different and less gentle type of mouth action going on. Back upstairs, Debby is lovingly sucking head black dude's cock. So we cut between dueling fellatio for a while. Background music is just some instrument stuff, if you were wondering.

Head black dude fucks Debby. (We see penetration.) Debby gives head black dude a hand job. Debby gives head black dude head, with the camera doing that romantic soft-focus type technique. A wasted effort. Head black dude licks Debby's light pink pussy. Head black dude fucks Debby some more and comes on her belly. Fade out.

Debby wakes up and head black dude is asleep. She sneaks out of the room and sneaks downstairs. Everyone is asleep. She grabs her shoes but the black bitch wakes up and alerts everyone that the honky bitch is going out the door. They grab her. Some are of the opinion they should just kill her now, but head black dude says to tie her to the bed. Black flunky number one takes her upstairs and ties her wrists to the headboard posts, but doesn't tie her feet. We watch him tie her wrists, though, and it takes a while. And he's straddling her naked the whole time, so there's that.

Head black dude walks in and tells Debby she'll be all right because he told them to leave her alone. Then he leaves. It comes as no surprise when black bitch walks in and tells her she's going to let the retarded guy have his way with her and then she's gonna carve her up, tit by tit. Just to prove her point, she burns the bottom of Debby's foot with a cigarette.

In walks the retarded guy. Black bitch rips off Debby's panties and tells the retarded guy to have at her. One of Debby's hands is mysteriously untied, because she rolls over onto her stomach. The retarded guy sticks his finger up her ass again. He seems to like doing that. Black bitch tells him to fuck her in the ass. He does. Debby just kind of whimpers. Both of her hands are now untied. She starts reciting the Lord's Prayer. He continues fucking her and eventually squirts white semen out on her lower back.

Black bitch says now it's her turn, she's gonna cut her tit off. Retarded guy tries to stop her so she stabs him. What a bitch. She leans over and rears back and starts down with the knife when suddenly BOOM! she goes flying backward against the wall because head black dude just unloaded a shotgun into her ample black chest. That sequence was strangely satisfying and cathartic. Turns out head black dude had come back because he forgot something. This time he tells Debby to come with him.

They walk outside. He gives her directions to the road and sets her free. She asks if he has to do it. He just looks noble and gets back in the car. She watches her brave black dude go off to fight The Honky, unsure whether he will survive. Oh the humanity.

As Debby slowly walks down the road we get to hear "Summer in the City" once again.

Okay, in case you didn't pick up on it in my review, this flick had an incredibly racist subtext. This played out more like a public service announcement co-funded by the John Birch Society and the Ku Klux Klan. It was pretty offensive.

However, as a GIMP flick it was not bad. It had the initial kidnapping and back seat rape of Debby by the head black dude. It had the gang bang rape of Debby by the three other black dudes. It had the rape of the black bitch by two of the black dudes. It had the bondage scene where Debby was tied to the bed. It had the rape scene where the retarded guy sodomized Debby. It also had the consensual sex scene thrown in there which was at least XXX sex. Debby did fight initially, but the noises she made while being raped were fairly lame. If she had been a virgin, I would have expected more shrill screaming during her rapes. Also, I would have expected more shrill screaming while she was being sodomized. So that aspect could have been better. But the rapes were pretty good. So this gets a B-.

I downloaded this from Bizarro Video from the membership area. It is also available on DVD from Bizarro Video. You can find it in the XXX Grindhouse section.

Saturday, October 18th 2008 - 07:04:34 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Regarding the YouTied trailer for Copy Cat The Masked Venetian that I posted about last night, I asked MasterDetective about why it suddenly went missing this morning. Apparently, the poster requested that he wanted it taken down because he didn't like it...I guess he changed his mind. At any rate, you can get a much more clear copy of the trailer (as well as some hi-res bondage stills of the victim) at the site I linked to last night, She is definitely easy on the eyes. I just don't know if the movie will go far enough to satisfy me. Anybody feel like this is one to take a chance on?


Talking about Jailhouse Girls, we have a full-length review in the Reviews section, along with a link of where to buy it on DVD. There's also a still in the Rape in Adult Movies database, which I've put in my Homepage URL.

You might notice the URL of the picture, BTW. YouTied has graciously agreed to donate storage space for us to host nearly all the various pictures we have on the site, most of them located in our various databases. Our friend Scribbler will also be helping out by hosting the rest of the images as well. It will take a long time to completely restore all the files that we'll be losing when AOL pulls the plug on us at the end of the month. I got started tonight and it is going to be a long process, and I'm not going to make the October 31 deadline. Amazingly, this will be the third time I've had to put together these databases, and I'm having to start over again from scratch, which really sucks and takes up hours of my free time that I would rather be doing something else. Hopefully this will be the last time and everything will stick.


John Galt: When I saw you had posted yet another mega-long review (actually 2 of them), I cringed. Yeah, I'm not a fan of reviews that take read like novels, since I'm part of the fast-paced MTV generation that likes immediate gratification, and my theory is that a lot of people will skip an extremely long post because they fear it's going to be a chore to read. Anybody else feel the same way?

That said, I'm always glad I take the time to read your reviews. The review of Hot Summer in the City had me laughing out loud! Honestly, some of the biggest laughs I've had in a long time. In this case, you actually reviewed a film I've seen before, and I agree, it's definitely worthwhile in a cheesy kind of way. I took a lot of scenes from this film on my highlights tape, including some of those great euphemisms they used for having sex with her. I'll admit the acting was lame and the dialogue was laughable, but that's part of the entertainment value. They definitely don't make them like that anymore. No wonder Tarantino loves this movie.

I wasn't aware that Lisa Baker had been a Playboy Playmate of the Year. I thought Teri Weigel was the only playmate that later got into XXX-rated porn afterward. Looks like they forgot about this chick, even if she only made the one film.

Your reviews are both located in the Classic Adult category of the Reviews page. Thanks for your latest contributions, they are always appreciated.

Saturday, October 18th 2008 - 11:04:07 PM

Name: zee-ef-ex

I remember Jailhouse Girls.

I also remember another good one that I think had Ginger Lynn and Kristara Barrington in it. It was tamer, but there was bondage. There were these guys who would somehow hypnotize the girls with music on those really large headphones. There was this black room with this spinning teeter totter thing that three of the girls were tied up to at once (including Ginger Lynn) and the girls were kissing each other while being spun around and fucked by different guys. (I think I'm remembering this correctly).

I think it was Kristara who was on roller skates (indoors) and that 1980s satin short-short and leggings aerobics outfit-look so popular at the time who was tied up and carried to another room to be fucked. If I remember correctly, she came by in all her insouciant, 1980s gum-snapping teen rollergirl delivery person glory, and was given the headphones to put on at which time she melted into a willing sex slave.

The movie was well-filmed and very sexy. It also made a lasting impression on me for one of its poses. There are certain poses I really like e.g. AOH or doggy-style or spread-eagle. Then there are poses I don't like at all, e.g. reverse cowgirl. I don't know why, it just bugs me.

But in this movie IIRC Kristara's hands were tied in front of her, and she was picked up in the air by the guy standing in front of her holding her under her butt, and she put her tied arms around his neck to hold on while he carried her to the next room to get fucked. There's something that really got me about that type of carry, a combination of bondage plus willingness plus vulnerability. Ever since, it's been one of my fetishy triggers. I love to carry girlfriends like that.

I also remember a movie with a lot of different girls, maybe a compilation, also from the early 1980s, where the Kristara Barrington scene was the best one in the movie. There was a 4-poster bed in the bedroom, and I think she was tied up on the bed at one point for anal sex, and then tied up kneeling on the floor with the back of her head against the footboard of the bed for oral sex after the anal. Her head being pushed up against the footboard of course stopped the physical resistance of her body's motion with the mouth fucking so the oral went pretty deep throat. I just remember it being a hard, BDSM, sexy scene.


Sunday, October 19th 2008 - 12:05:03 AM

Name: Remi Duval
E-mail address:

I am truly honored that some of my artwork appears in your website Ralfus

Sunday, October 19th 2008 - 03:00:18 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

Ralphus: Thanks for the information on Jailhouse Girls. Gee, there was an idea I didn't consider -- check the Reviews section. Color my face red.


zee-ef-ex wrote:

I also remember another good one that I think had Ginger Lynn and Kristara Barrington in it. It was tamer, but there was bondage. There were these guys who would somehow hypnotize the girls with music on those really large headphones. There was this black room with this spinning teeter totter thing that three of the girls were tied up to at once (including Ginger Lynn) and the girls were kissing each other while being spun around and fucked by different guys. (I think I'm remembering this correctly).

I think it was Kristara who was on roller skates (indoors) and that 1980s satin short-short and leggings aerobics outfit-look so popular at the time who was tied up and carried to another room to be fucked. If I remember correctly, she came by in all her insouciant, 1980s gum-snapping teen rollergirl delivery person glory, and was given the headphones to put on at which time she melted into a willing sex slave.

The 1985 film you're thinking of is the Dark Bros. classic, New Wave Hookers. As the title suggests, two guys fantasize about using New Wave music to hypnotize young women into becoming prostitutes. This one has the classic scene where Ginger Lynn is DP'd by two college geeks.

Actually, the woman on the roller skates in this movie was Desiree Lane. Kristara Barrington was in the politically correct scene where Jamie Gillis and Jack Baker are eating sushi while they have their way with Kristara.

I can't remember how well this movie works as a GIMP film -- I mostly remember the Ginger DP -- but it definitely is a hoot. Just don't go looking for the scene with "The Devil." Some issues were uncovered about the actress playing the Devil, a certain Ms. Lords, and her scenes have been removed. Also, if anyone watching this movie notices that Jack Baker (now deceased) looks familiar, here's why -- he made some guest appearances as "Sticks" the drummer in Richie Cunningham's band on Happy Days. He also appeared in the film Kentucky Fried Movie.

Sunday, October 19th 2008 - 06:44:23 AM

Name: Hilbama
Homepage URL:

"Lisa Baker" of Hot Summer in the City is not Lisa Baker the 1966 Playmate of the Year (despite imdb and Wikipedia entries to the contrary). I put link to Lisa Baker playmate photo in the Homepage URL above. She is obviously not the blonde in the Bizarro Video screenshots. My former next-door-neighbor was also named Lisa Baker, and she was neither a playmate nor a porn star.

Sunday, October 19th 2008 - 07:24:31 AM

Name: John Galt

Hilbama: Well heck. I guess I'll need to increase my independent Internet sources to THREE usually dependable sites instead TWO when I read and confirm information from now on. Thanks for the correction.

Just for the record, I pulled out my hardbound copy of The Playmate Book and confirmed that the picture on the Playboy web site is indeed the same girl that appeared in Playboy. You just can't be too careful any more.

I don't know about IMDB, but you could notify Wikipedia and they would probably correct their entry, if you would like to set the record straight. You might leave out the bit about how lots of people share a name but not an occupation, though, as it is an obvious statement that would come across as snarky, which I'm sure you didn't intend. ;)

Sunday, October 19th 2008 - 08:02:02 AM

Name: Dan Hawke
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Ralphus, get ready to be surprised by a short post.

I don't generally read all of John's reviews either. That said it is great to have someone who takes the time to post significant posts to the site. I read every non-review word John writes, skim the review and check his synopsis paragraph. If it intrigues me, then I delve deeper. Still lots of folks seem to get a real pleasure out of them and I might read them all if I had more time.

Non technical GIMPERS can help Ralphus to make sure nothing gets lost by going to the individual pages of the GIMP site and (in explorer - firefox has something similar) clicking on the File menu and selecting "Save As" to save the pages to your local machine. If 10% of Gimpers each randomly picked 10% of the content it would become nearly impossible for Ralphus not to be able to find someone on the site who might have any content that goes missing.

RM to some DVD outputable format. I bought two different products AVOne RM converter and WinAVI Video Convertor. Both worked, though I might have needed intermediate steps (like mpg or wmv) to be created from rm, before outputing them in full dvd format. I think that WinAVI was the better product, but it has been a long time since I used either so I am going from memory.


Sunday, October 19th 2008 - 09:56:33 AM

Name: Dan Hawke
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Oops, another quick note...

Joe Wrap's link ( with old HOM has some interesting stuff... If you have display set to 20 items per page and go to page 26 to the clip titled "Curiosity Excited The Kat ...clip1..." (just past halfway down the page) just watch the scrolling pics for the clip and you will see eventually a quick flash of the credits featuring our main man's picture and the credit "Jeremy Whitman as General Kull" which pretty much shows how our main man had himself credited in his productions.


Sunday, October 19th 2008 - 10:08:27 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

Bound 'N' Sexy has a new trailer posted for the Masked Venetian and it looks good. I would advise you MTV-generation types to stick with the trailer for the full 57 seconds.

Sunday, October 19th 2008 - 03:32:17 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

I have posted the trailer on YouTied for Attackers JBD-108. I'm wondering if anyone has actually seen this film. It looks like it has some creative scenes, and it stars Ayumi Hasegawa, who is proving to be one of Attackers' most reliable performers (Shark Special 31, Slave Islands 7 and 12). If anyone has seen it, I would be interested to know what you thought of the movie.

Monday, October 20th 2008 - 03:15:47 AM

Name: Thanagar

John Galt: Thanks for another entertaining review. Just to nit-pick for moment, the song by the Temptations that you referenced is actually "I Can't Help Myself" by the Four Tops, whose lead singer Levi Stubbs just died the other day.

On a more serious topic, one of the things I find really tiresome these days is entertainment reviewers in my local paper (and elsewhere) who feel the need to inject their personal politcal beliefs into their reviews. Perhaps the moderator of this forum, and anyone else who wants to advance a political agenda here will do us all a favor and take it to the op-ed page of their favorite paper, or the Daily Kos, or anyplace but here.

Monday, October 20th 2008 - 07:57:37 AM

Name: Sloth
E-mail address:

Mornin All

Brutus - thanks for that heads up on "BTK". Been waiting for someone to come out with a decent version and this looks like the best so far. I was about to pull the trigger on an order from Asian Cult for that flick and at the last moment an imaginary crawler appeared at the bottom of the computer screen which read "A look into the mind of a serial killer." I may still get that but a little more research first.

A Canadian - I've not seen JBD 108 but I like the looks and am preparing a Video Mayhem order - I'll put that one on and let you know - and hey, loved the "Wolf Creek" sequences you posted on YouTied.

Stay Well All

Monday, October 20th 2008 - 08:09:43 AM

Name: John Galt

Thanagar: D'oh! Right you are. It was The Four Tops. I knew I should have looked that up instead of pulling it out of memory. I still kind of liked identifying it by the line "Sugar Pie Honey Bunch," though, because it was funnier that way. Plus, it frequently is referred to as "I Can't Help Myself (Sugar Pie Honey Bunch)" in write-ups.

As to political beliefs. Hmm. We are living in a dangerously divided society right now in which, not to put too fine a point on it, the readers and contributors to this forum could easily find themselves at odds with "the law" if the wrong people started pushing their political agendas through more successfully and got certain laws passed. I don't think it unfair or wrong to opine that almost eight years of an oppressive Republican administration that sold its former political beliefs out to Christian fundamentalists is to blame. I have read forum entries here, within the last month, in which business owners have mentioned the care they take to fly below the radar so as to avoid arrest and persecution, if not prosecution. I have read entries by a business owner whose business transaction capabilities have been compromised by pressures as a result of that same political agenda.

I think it is dangerous to ignore that. I think issues of government censorship, and the political parties, individuals, or religious organizations that advocate censorship, are fair game for discussion in any context. I believe to stick our heads in the sand and pretend it is not happening or does not exist is unwise. Along with the entertainment aspect of the GIMP forum, which is certainly GIMP movies, there is also a political aspect of the GIMP forum, which would certainly be anti-censorship. If you want the former, you will have to support the latter. This is a good place to voice that support.

My two cents. The moderator makes the rules, though.

Monday, October 20th 2008 - 09:06:43 AM

Name: Brutus

Ralphus: I can't say this enough but the work you put into this site is always greatly appreciated. I guess we should also thank Scribbler and MasterDetective. Thanks guys. Does this mean the AOL crisis is under control? I think Dan Hawke had a good idea about getting GIMPers here to save some pages on the site. In fact, I had saved a big chunk of the archives for reading material on a long flight. If there's anything else that might help, let us know.

As for the BoundnSexy movie, I've got a feeling that most of it will feature the babe simply struggling in bondage with a few token appearances by the villain. The women on that site are indeed gorgeous, but the overall image I get is "love bondage." Hope I'm wrong.

Sloth: Hold on a bit before ordering BTK. I found the DVD in one of my local video stores and will try to post a review of it soon.

A Canadian: I haven't seen JBD-108, but the trailer you provided was titillating. Looks like standard Jyabaku fare: heavier on the bondage and torture than the SHK material.

John Galt: I do indeed read all of your reviews and those of everyone else here, although if the movie doesn't interest me right away, like Young Girls for Sale, I tend to skim through the review. I'm also guilty of writing long reviews, but if people are interested in the movie, I hope the information helps. If not, no one is forcing them to read through it all.

zee-ef-ex: I'm not much into amateur porn, but the clip was pretty nice, although not quite violent enough for me.

Bill Zebub wrote: It's rather baffling to me how a horror fan actually gets turned off by nudity.

That is strange. One of the reasons I got into horror movies was because of the good chance that the females would get naked at some point and hopefully captured, tied up and tortured. And I'd say the majority of the covers for horror movies feature some sort of sexy image. Sex and horror go hand in hand in films IMHO.

Monday, October 20th 2008 - 09:08:33 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

Sloth: I'm looking forward to your assessment of JBD-108. I'm with Brutus on this one -- the trailer certainly looks titillating.


As for politically charged reviews, I don't know. I didn't think there was anything in John Galt's reviews that would cause anyone to get steamed. I think we can safely assume John isn't an undecided voter, and maybe the cracks about Republican warnings about horny black dudes were a bit edgy. But I didn't have the sense John was trying to push his views on anyone. Heck, if Sarah Palin can get down to Amy Poehler's rap song, I think a little political humor is OK.

Of course, I may be the wrong guy to ask. Every now and then, I enjoy the political discussions.

Monday, October 20th 2008 - 05:48:29 PM

Name: John Galt

Hey, you know, I just want to keep things lively.


I will say this. Getting a membership to Bizarro Video for a month has exposed me to a lot of GIMP genre stuff I didn't know existed before. A lot of crap, but also a lot of, well, bizarre stuff. For example, I downloaded and watched the first three The Rapeman movies. I tried, I really did, to keep these short. But even when I leave out all the plot stuff I still end up with detailed descriptions of rape scenes. Oh well. I reviewed all three, but I'll space them out into three posts.

I'll let Ralphus decide if this goes under "Rape Movies" or "Japanese Movies."

The Rapeman is a mild-mannered school teacher by day (he even wears black glasses and kind of looks like a Japanese Clark Kent) and vigilante by night, dressed all in black with a mask shaped like the head of a penis, righting wrongs through penetration. That's the motto of Rapeman Services. Wikipedia tells me this movie series is based on a manga comic, and the last movie aired in 1996. You can read the Wikipedia entry if you are interested. These are "pink" movies, by the way, with no explicit sex.


The Rapeman (AKA The Reipuman) (1993)

The Rapeman actually has an engaging plot, in this instance political intrigue. I will refrain from a retelling of the story (oh my god I could almost hear the collective sigh of relief). We begin with The Rapeman (and that "The" is important, as comic book aficionados will tell you, it is not "Batman," it is "The Batman") looking down from on high as a guy drops off his girlfriend. He's just given her a gift, and they've been dating for 6 months and she hasn't put out yet. He was kind of hoping.... Well, she crushes him and breaks up with him, the bitch, and saunters off with a backward glance and a casual "I'll keep the gift!"

The Rapeman rappels down the side of the apartment building and crashes into her apartment. He tape gags her mouth, handcuffs her wrists behind her back, strips off her dress, hikes her up onto a table against the wall, and as he rapes her, he tells her he has a gift from all the guys she has bankrupted. There is nudity and we get to see her feet bounce and her hands grasp and clench as she is raped. The goal is to show her suffering, obviously, which is kind of neat. She makes pained rape victim noises. He rapes her into submission, and as he walks away, she asks for more. (Okay, but it was great up until that comment.)

The Rapeman is commissioned by a jilted lover to rape a politician's new wife. The Rapeman is uncomfortable with the job, but takes it on. He grabs her in the parking garage, drags her into the back seat of her car, handcuffs her, and rapes her. There's not a lot to see this time around. No nudity, no tape gag, not even any motion indicative of violent sex. As a rape scene, it is a bust. However, while he's struggling with her, a car drives by and takes pictures of The Rapeman raping her. A set up!

As Keisuke (The Rapeman's Clark Kent alter ego) walks home the next day, he catches sight of a girl with a telephoto lens taking pictures of the "jilted lover" leaving Rapeman Services after paying for the job. Keisuke thinks she is the same person from last night. She is a reporter. The Rapeman attacks her in her apartment. He throws her on her bed. She looks sufficiently terrified. He produces his trademark handcuffs and cuffs her wrists behind her back. Tells her he won't hurt her if she gives him the photos and negatives. She doesn't know what he's talking about. He shows her his partner with a camera and tells her that her rape will be filmed and they'll send the pictures to every media center if she doesn't cooperate. She demurs. The Rapeman tears open her blouse (she is wearing an industrial grade white bra, unfortunately), opens his pants, and grabs her legs, pulls them apart, kneels between them and moves in when she says okay, she'll give him the pictures and negatives. Damn. She gives him an undeveloped roll of film. He says if they aren't the right ones, she knows what will happen.

Well, they aren't the right ones. The Rapeman returns the next night. She is in bed. He flings the sheets aside (she is not nude, dammit) and brandishes his switchblade knife. He runs the knife up her pretty bare leg and tugs her panties with the tip. They talk. Turns out she doesn't know about the rape photos. But she does identify the "jilted lover" who commissioned him to rape the politician's wife as a known associate of a yakuza boss. He says sorry for the misunderstanding and leaves her alone. She was kind of cute and I was looking forward to seeing her raped. But The Rapeman only rapes women who deserve it.

On the "jilted lover's" orders, yakuza thugs beat up The Rapeman's partner. Now it's personal. The Rapeman catches the "jilted lover," who is the manager of a night club, in the bathroom of her club. He cuffs one of her hands to the sink, rips open her blouse (she is wearing a bra) and asks her who took the photos. She doesn't know. Thank god. He pulls down her dress and bends her over the sink counter and rapes her from behind. It is in slo-mo, which robs it of some energy and violence. She makes victim noises but they could have been better. He leaves and when we cut back to her she is sitting on the floor, still handcuffed to the sink, drowsily saying "that was great." But it was an okay rape up until that point.

Turns out the bad guy behind all the frames and dirty tricks is the rival politician and he has an evil Dragon Lady campaign assistant who is calling a lot of the nastiest shots. She is lured to an empty office and The Rapeman confronts her there. He handcuffs her to the legs of a chair and then sits the chair up on a desk, so that she is on her knees with her elbows on the desk and her hands cuffed up at shoulder height. He reaches up under her throat from behind and arches her head back. He rips her suit off to expose her black lacy bra and panties. He rips off her panties to reveal her shapely bare butt. Then he rapes her from behind, and it is a nice, rough, rape. She makes nice victim noises and looks discomfited by the penetrating justice being dealt her. Her hands flex and grasp at the chair legs. He waits until the very end to take off her bra and expose one breast and squeeze it roughly. High marks for this rape.

The Rapeman's moral compass wasn't pointing True North in this first movie. The first rape of the bitch serial dater-and-dumper was good. Tape gag, wrists handcuffed behind the back, bare breasts, and fairly strenuous rape action, were all very nice. Unfortunately, his next two victims--the politician's wife and the reporter--were innocents. However, the rape of the politician's wife was very brief and aside from handcuff bondage and kidnapping/struggling, not much to write home about. The almost-rape of the reporter, on both occasions, had excellent tension and build-up, with handcuff bondage in the first instance and switchblade knife threatening in the second. She looked appropriately frightened both times.

The rape of the night club madam was mediocre. There was no nudity, which always loses points with me personally. She wasn't sufficiently frightened or in enough pain. The action was okay, but the extras--like victim noises and pained or frightened expressions--were lacking. The final rape of the Dragon Lady was excellent, though. Outstanding build-up, nice camera shots of her hands and feet reacting as she is being violated, a very rough rape from behind, great victim noises and pained facial expressions, handcuff bondage, and nudity. No gags, but oh well. So, four rapes and two almost-rapes, with handcuff bondage. I would give this a B, both because it had an engaging and well-executed plot, and because it had copious rapes, the final one being excellent in almost every respect.

I downloaded this from Bizarro Video, and I suspect it is available from them on DVD as well. I just didn't see it in my cursory search. I also found it at WTFDVDs and Rezarected. Neither of them are in the US. I have never ordered from them myself. So buyer beware.

Monday, October 20th 2008 - 08:37:40 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Thanagar: I certainly grok what you're saying about keeping politics off the forum. By and large, this is not a political forum; we're about extreme bondage videos. Indeed, on rare occasions, I have had to remove overtly political posts that had nothing to do with the theme of this forum, even the ones that I agreed with. I do that so that the forum doesn't run amuck and go wildly off-topic. It's my job to steer the discussion toward our mission statement, located on the second page of the main site, and in case you haven't read it lately, I'll refresh your memory:

This site is devoted to reviewing and discussing Extreme Bondage Videos. Visitors are encouraged to provide their feedback about recent releases, their favorite scenes and videos, and their opinion on such issues as censorship and free expression. They are welcome to relate their personal experiences and/or problems with their fetish.

Now, I will allow political postings if, in part, they deal with the theme of this forum. Recently, we had a thread going where Larry of Video Mayhem had his merchant account canceled after they got a closer look at his site and decided they didn't like the adult content. That didn't used to be the case. Because of the political censorship of this Republican administration, it is now virtually impossible for adult merchants to get credit card accounts in the United States. That is flat out censorship, it's unconstitutional, and it's also against everything we support and believe in on this forum.

A few years back, the Republicans changed the 2257 ordinance to apply to "secondary producers", where even someone like me, an ordinary Joe who runs a free discussion group with no vested interest in making money from adult product, potentially faces 5 years in prison because I don't have background records of whatever model that might appear in whatever daily picture I choose to run on any particular night. It doesn't matter if she's of legal age or not, although trust me, nobody in the adult industry hires performers under the age of 18. The government knows that, and yet they continue to harass and threaten members of the adult industry with prosecution, prison time and loss of business. It happens all the time, and countless adult producers and merchants have seen it happen to them.

Just a few weeks ago Max Hardcore was sentenced to 46 months in prison, and his website was forfeited to the government. Was he breaking the law somehow? No, he was doing his job. He made movies. That's it. He was singled out by an overzealous prosecutor, following the government's lead, and they made an example of him. And under this administration, no one is safe.

I'll tell you what we're NOT going to do here. As John Galt astutely observed, we're not going to bury our heads in the sand and pretend this isn't happening, in this supposedly free country, in this year or any other year. If anything, there needs to be MORE discussion of our rights being taken away, not less.

I'm not a fan of politics per se, but I am in favor of free speech, and I think it's important for people here to know which political party is in favor of censoring an individual's right to view whatever he wants in the privacy of his own home. If that means nothing to you, feel free to vote for McCain and the rest of the Republicans come November. God knows it couldn't get much worse after the 8 years of what George W. Bush did to our freedoms.

Still, I would prefer to see the pendulum swing for the people this time and maybe not toward forcing us to fear persecution for watching and talking about bondage films, which should be our right as Americans first and as mature, open-minded adults in general. And I certainly hope everyone else here feels the same way.

Monday, October 20th 2008 - 08:50:05 PM

Name: Sloth
E-mail address:

Mornin All

John Galt - that's a nice review on "Rapeman" - I've never viewed any of that series as I've heard there is a big "comic effect" element built into them - is that the case here on this entry as it sounds like my kind of viewing - your thoughts on that please. Saw your comment on WTFDVDs - I recently placed my first order with that outfit - I've not viewed all of them yet but here is the poop - so far on the two I've seen the quality is quite nice - delivery time was three weeks from order which I found reasonable as they are shipped from overseas, most likely England - no shipping charges and almost all vids are priced at $16.00 US.

Brutus - thanks partner, I'll hold on "BTK" till I see your post - last night got a chance to view "The Torturer" and concur with your "wheel chair scene" assessment - knowing our host gnomes affinity for all things "current" me thinks that is his kind of scene as well - will leave some overall thoughts on the flick later this week.

BigD - picked up "Red Ridge" and was pleasantly surprised - a low budget indie where the folks seem to know what they're doing and the folks onscreen really can act - again, I'll leave some thoughts on that one later this week.

Ralphus - that hanging in "Red Ridge" was no teaser - more on that with another post.

Stay Well All

Tuesday, October 21st 2008 - 09:25:59 AM

Name: John Galt

Sloth: The Rapeman movies I've seen are fully developed movies, with comedic and dramatic moments. People die tragically (an innocent 6-year old girl in the second one) one moment, and then some scenes are played for a laugh to lighten things up. However, when the rape scenes kick in, they are not done for laughs. So it is kind of a tough call. I know exactly what you are getting at, and that was a concern for me, but when the real bad guys (or girls, in this case) get theirs, it is pretty satisfying. So far, I liked the first one the best. If you want to check one out, I would recommend that one.

Tuesday, October 21st 2008 - 09:49:45 AM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Catching up on things...

John Galt: Thanks for another great review. You just have to love the Japanese. "Righting wrongs through penetration"...what a great motto. Only in Japan would they get away with a concept like that. I can really get behind a superhero like The Rapeman. And to make it into a movie, and even with several sequels? Could you imagine doing that in this country? People go nutso whenever the next installment of the Harry Potter or Pirates of the Caribbean is due in the theaters. But no, in Japan, they're waiting for the next Rapeman. I love it.

I've actually seen the first sequel, which I expect you'll be reviewing here next, but none of the others. I have a book that says there are at least 7 Rapeman films and 2 spinoffs. And actually for me, the choice wasn't between categorizing the film under "Rape Movies" or "Japanese", it was whether to put it in under "Mainstream". I finally decided more people would look for it under Japanese. Look for the direct link in my Homepage URL.

BTW, I love the Rapeman's code of ethics. He only rapes women who deserve it. I guess that would be...all of them? Or just the cute ones? I don't know; I think I need to study this page some more: Asking For it. It must be true since it's on the Internet.


A few of you were mentioning Attackers JB-108. Well, I have seen it and without giving too much away, I'll say it was on my short list of the Best Movies of 2007. Very good film with an appealing victim (the complete package because not only is she very attractive, she's also a great screamer) and of course, the Master, Randa Mai as the one dishing out the punishment. Looking forward to the review.


Sloth: You big tease, telling us about all these new films you're going to be reviewing. I'm especially looking forward to Red Ridge, especially with your early word that this is one mainstream title that won't disappoint. Can't wait to hear more.


Brutus: Yeah, the AOL crisis is under control, although we'll lose quite a few of the database pictures once October 31 hits, because there's no way I can get all those restored in time unless I quit my job and work around the clock to meet the deadline. I have them all in my hard drive, though, so they won't be vanishing forever; they'll just be AWOL until I can get them back up online.

Tuesday, October 21st 2008 - 09:25:07 PM

Name: Vince

I've never seen or knew about the "Rapeman" series until now. They sound like fun.

I wish Spielberg or Lucas would get off their asses and make an American version.

I'd pay double to see that rather than another bastardized version of "Star Wars" or "Indiana Jones".

Tuesday, October 21st 2008 - 10:21:20 PM

Name: weewilly

Don't forget the Rapeman motto, "Righting wrongs through penetration."

Wednesday, October 22nd 2008 - 01:37:23 AM

Name: John Galt

Alas, Hell will freeze over before any American filmmaker would take on this series, in my opinion. And let's face it. An American filmmaker could not do this justice. American filmmakers tend to "miss the point" in blindingly obvious ways. In "Sin City," Jessica Alba was cast as a stripper and had a no-nudity clause in her contract. An intelligent director would have recast for someone who could play a stripper, whose defining characteristic, after all, is stripping. The same thing happened in "Closer," with Natalie Portman. So I strongly suspect an American adaptation would feature no nudity and no rape, and only in America could someone pull that off. They would make up for it, though, by featuring over-the-top violence, where people are shot, stabbed, garroted or blown up in bloody slo-mo, which would be perfectly acceptable. Thank you, Puritans and other early religiously intolerant founders, for giving our society a legacy of death and cruelty but a deathly revulsion and fear of sex.


The Rapeman 2 (AKA The Reipuman 2) (1994)

In The Rapeman 2, The Rapeman takes on evil in a hospital. So if one of your fantasies involves girls in nurse uniforms and rape, this might flick your BIC.

First Rape: The movie begins with a girl screaming and running down a drainage ditch with The Rapeman in close pursuit. He catches her and quickly handcuffs her to a pipe. Then he brings out his trusty switchblade and whips it around in a cool fashion to extend the blade. He deftly cuts off her panties and now she is naked, squatting down against a low concrete wall. The Rapeman hauls her up by the hips until she is standing, bent over at the waist, and rapes her from behind (which is apparently his preferred position). Nice long shots of her naked body bouncing forward and back as she is being fucked. Good pained victim sounds. Some slo-mo, but it makes it easier to admire her bare breasts. Hands grasping the pipe and flexing. All the standard rape responses cataloged effectively. She collapses and The Rapeman looks at the camera and says "When the law is powerless, I will punish the guilty." Cut to titles.

The Rapeman is commissioned to rape a woman who stood up a guy on their wedding day. She started spending lavishly and he suspects she had a "sugar daddy," and now he and his father are ashamed and his mother committed suicide over the shame. The Japanese need to lighten up. The woman in question is a nurse, and we find her reading her bankbook with pleasure, noting she has $30,000 and thinking maybe she should put a down payment on a yacht. She is lured to an empty hospital room where The Rapeman is waiting for her.

Second Rape: The Rapeman chases her around the room and back and forth across the bed a few times before he finally grabs her and tears open the front of her uniform. She is wearing teeny weeny white panties and a small white bra. He handcuffs her to the bed so that she is on her knees kneeling on the floor bent over it. He lifts up her uniform to reveal her butt and tears off her panties. He lifts her to her feet--still bent over--and rapes her from behind. She grunts and cries out with each thrust. He pounds away at her, reaches around and rips away her bra, and continues fucking her as she cries out and looks like she's in pain. Her rape goes on for quite a while, until she finally collapses forward onto the bed, spent and exhausted.

Plot in a Nutshell: The next day, Keisuke (The Rapeman's everyday identity) runs into the reporter from the first movie, who is pursuing a story about the Hong Kong mafia. A lot of plot development, during which the reporter discovers a female doctor in the hospital is dealing with the Hong Kong mafia, trafficking in human organs harvested from healthy patients. And they murder a cute little 6-year old girl that Keisuke and his partner knew to harvest their latest batch. The parents and Keisuke's partner contact a lady attorney to help them look into the little girl's death. Meanwhile, the intrepid reporter continues investigating and uncovers the whole sordid plot, but she gets caught. And the lady attorney is in on it as well.

Third Rape: The Rapeman attacks the female doctor in the elevator. He holds her at knife point and handcuffs her to the cage. (It is one of those old-fashioned cage elevators.) The camera shows us she is barefoot as she tries to escape from The Rapeman. He rips open her white hospital dress. He strips the dress off of her and leaves her wearing only her panties. She is making great scared victim noises the entire time. She is facing the cage wall, with her back to The Rapeman. He cuts off her panties, then puts his knife away. He questions her but she won't answer. So he starts raping her (from the back, of course). He thrusts into her repeatedly, slamming her up against the wall and bouncing her back and forth. We get a tour of her body the whole time. She has nice breasts. Her rape goes on for several minutes.

The reporter is in the operating room, hands tied over her head on an operating table. They are about to harvest her organs. They roll up her shirt to expose her... bra. Damn. She wakes up and screams. The scalpel descends and reaches her tender belly when suddenly Keisuke barges in and floors both doctors and rescues her. She goes to call the police.

Fourth Rape: The Rapeman needs to act before the police arrive. When the lady attorney comes to the operating room to check on whether they have finished carving up the reporter, The Rapeman is waiting. He wrestles her to the operating table and bends her over it. He tears off her blouse but she is wearing a black camisole. He sits her on the operating table and he handcuffs one of her wrists to the overhead swivel light. He moves the knife toward her throat, but then reverses it and slices down the center of her camisole, revealing her naked breasts. He points the knife at her knee, then runs it up her thigh and slips under one side of her panties and then slowly pulls outward as her panties stretch and then tear through. He puts the knife away. He grabs one leg and jerks her body sideways, then thrusts into her. Her head bounces back and she grunts and whimpers. He does her in slow, measured, brutal thrusts. She does not scream enough. We also do not see enough of her naked body because the camera is always filming up from the floor. But it is still a righteous rape scene.

Summary: So, four rapes in this movie, with handcuff bondage in them all. The first, pre-titles rape was very nice, although a little dark (as in not well-lighted). Full nudity, hot body, violent rape action, good victim sounds. The second rape of the nurse was also very nice. Once again, it was kind of dark. It was NOT full nudity, but we saw her breasts and enough of her body to know it was nice and shapely. It was a longer rape scene with good sounds and expressions. A long lull in the middle while the plot developed. Then in quick succession the long and brutal standing rape of the lady doctor in the elevator, with full body nudity, and the rape on the operating table of the lady attorney, who was wearing the tatters of her panties and camisole but since the scene was mostly filmed from underneath there wasn't much to see. Plus, the attempted live dissection of the reporter. No gags at all. That just isn't The Rapeman's style. All in all, four nice rape scenes, integrated into a fairly good storyline in a slick and professional presentation. I think this deserves a B.

I downloaded this from Bizarro Video, and I suspect it is available from them on DVD as well. I just didn't see it in my cursory search. I also found it at WTFDVDs and Rezarected. Prior warnings apply, although Sloth reported he had a good experience with WTFDVDs. That's encourgaing, because it looked like they had several decent products.

Wednesday, October 22nd 2008 - 05:04:10 AM

Name: A Canadian

John Galt: Great review of Rapeman 2. Rapeman sounds like a true hero for our times. I doubt I'll ever see this movie but I hope I'm wrong.

Wednesday, October 22nd 2008 - 05:14:25 PM

Name: elkcreek
E-mail address:

Sorry, I haven't been around much lately, busy on the road. I did download some Casualties of Horror clips from Niche Clips, I will say that Paris Kennedy is the real deal and she sells it. Reviews to follow.

A quick political note, please don't assume that a liberal administration will solve our censorship issues. A few points, 1) One I notice on Bizzaro Video that regulations changed in 1995, Who was President in 95? 2) Canada and England are much more liberal (politically) then the US and yet are much more restrictive when it comes to our taste. 3) Liberalism is about bureaucratic power, and once that power is given to government it is rare for them to relinquish it. Ask the Canadian about Canadas HRC's That is real censorship.

Political Correctness is just a great a danger as right wing conservatism, perhaps more because conservatives (at least the real ones) are much more reluctant to exercise government power. In conclusion if your votes in this election are based on your fetish, it's probably a wash. I'm not interested in a debate, just responding for the sake of equal time. For the record I doubt you would get ANY politician to say our fetish taste should be protected expression.

Wednesday, October 22nd 2008 - 05:37:17 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

elkcreek: You're absolutely right. Sometimes, I think some people in the U.S. have been under neo-conservative rule for so long they forget the Christian right isn't the only threat to their freedom. Indeed, most people living in George W. Bush's America today have the freedom to watch materials that are illegal under the "obscenity" laws in so-called "liberal" countries like Canada.

On Monday, Ralphus wrote: I think it's important for people here to know which political party is in favor of censoring an individual's right to view whatever he wants in the privacy of his own home.

I was troubled when I read that. Obviously, Ralphus was talking about the Republicans -- but is the statement any less true regarding the Democrats?

I know people are hopeful the social conservative oppression will end when -- if speculation is right -- Barack Obama wins the election. I do worry, though, that the hope is based on nothing more than wishful thinking. Do we really know that Obama, a believer in big government, plans to ease the censorship of violent pornography?

Wednesday, October 22nd 2008 - 06:38:25 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

elkcreek: Totally agree with you on that one, my man. Voting Democratic will not necessarily bring our freedoms back. No politician for either party will ever come out in favor of porn... that would be political suicide. The devastation the past 8 years of the Bush administration brought upon the adult industry doesn't figure to suddenly get better once this regime gets voted out. The sad truth is that once these laws are passed, it's going to be very difficult if not impossible to ever get them reversed.

The difference is the priorities Republicans put upon enforcing these laws. During the first eight months of the Bush administration, the Justice Department reassigned dozens of FBI agents from counter-terrorism to obscenity cases, to better reflect the policy preferences and priorities of the administration. The obscenity laws didn't change when Bush took office, just the decision about how to utilize federal law enforcement resources.

I don't have the updated records available, but from 2001 through 2005 under Bush, the United States Department of Justice prosecuted 40 obscenity cases. And how many obscenity prosecutions were conducted under Clinton? Well, I have the answer to that one. From 1993 through 2000, there were...4.

So during the first 4 years under Bush, there were 10 times more prosecutions than in the entire 8 years under Clinton. And again, those records aren't updated. If they continued at the same pace the remaining 4 years, we're talking 20 times more than the previous administration. Those numbers speak for themselves. Think their priorities are a bit off-kilter?

My point is I would rather go with a party that doesn't make it one of their top goals to prosecute adult producers who are just doing their jobs and earning an honest, and dare I say legal living. Maybe instead they'll attempt to tackle the myriad of other problems this country has to contend with. The damage is already done. Let's not intentionally vote for more of the same political philosophies and potentially make things even worse.

Wednesday, October 22nd 2008 - 07:44:23 PM

Name: John Galt

Damn. Ralphus posted before I finished writing my reply and said almost everything I wrote. But I agree, and here is my post. I laughed out loud when I read Ralphus using the exact same phrase "political suicide."

I am under no illusions that any politician will ever come out in favor of any flavor of sexual liberation in America. It would be political suicide. To suggest that one candidate or political party that does not vocally support a politically untenable position (like anything having to do with sex in America) is the same thing as another candidate or party who actively persecutes it is dangerously simplistic, though.

It is very important to remember that while Democrat Bill Clinton was president in 1995 when the obscenity laws were modified, it was the newly empowered radical Republican Congress, under the fanatical leadership of Newt Gingrich and his "Contract With America," who passed those regulations. If you expected President Clinton, who was dogged by that same Republican Congress his entire administration for a semen stain on a dress, to try to veto or fight that obscenity regulation change, you have no concept of how politics in puritanical America work. You cannot fight something like that; the most you can do is keep it from ever becoming an issue.

The modern Republican Party has sold its soul to the Christian fundamentalists. It is a mystery to me how any real Republicans, like those who believe in fiscal responsibility, small government, and minimal government interference into private affairs, can in good faith belong to the same Republican Party of George W. Bush, who has practiced gross fiscal irresponsibility, grown government agencies and politicized them, and extended the reach of government ever more deeply into the private lives of American citizens. It is everything traditional Republicans oppose. What is going on here?

No one is ever going to openly repeal any obscenity laws. I don't expect that, and really only a fool would. But regulations can be relaxed, or not strictly enforced, or quietly changed. I am uncertain that an America under Barack Obama would pass worse obscenity legislation, but I am reasonably certain that an America under John McCain kowtowing to the Christian fundamentalists probably would.

And to go one step farther, if not too far, I am alarmed at the politics of hate, fear and divisiveness that the Republican Party is currently employing. A Republican senator calling Democrats "unAmerican," for example. American democracy is based on the very fundamental right of a citizen to vote. Yet the Republican Party is actively working to disenfranchise as many new voters as possible, in several key states. If you ask me, any political organization involved in taking away a citizen's right to vote comes dangerously close actually being unAmerican. I do not think that is an exaggeration. If you cannot vote, you have no voice.

Wednesday, October 22nd 2008 - 08:14:53 PM

Name: John Galt

And now for something completely different. The adventures of a hero no political party would ever endorse, who nonetheless rights wrongs through penetration. Truly, a hero for our times.


The Rapeman 3 (AKA The Reipuman 3) (1994)

No pre-title rape for The Rapeman 3. In fact, we begin with a lesbian scene where there is fingernail trimming (because you know lesbians always keep their fingernails short). It is not a bad lesbian sex scene, although it is non-explicit. The husband walks in and, not only is his wife unashamed of being caught with her lesbian lover, she proceeds to humiliate him. So, thoroughly humiliated, he seeks the assistance of The Rapeman. He loves his wife, and he is sure once his lesbian wife gets a taste of what it is like to be fucked by a man, she will give up women and their marriage will work out. I thought maybe this would be The Rapeman taking on lesbians, but actually he ends up taking on the corrupt police who blackmail underage girls into doing sex videos.

The Rapeman takes the commission to rape the errant carpet munching wife and "teach her the role of a real woman." He walks into her apartment and catches her munching carpet. He handcuffs the errant wife off to the side, by her wrist. He turns, does that cool thing where he whips out the blade of his switchblade knife, and presses it up against the extraneous girl's naked breast to keep her from moving while he snaps cuffs on her ankle and jerks her leg out and up and cuffs it to the top of the headboard. He turns to the errant wife. "Who are you?" she asks. "I am the symbol of man," The Rapeman intones. There is a little more camp in this episode.

He takes hold of both of her ankles, jerks her feet up apart and into the air, and rapes her. He thrusts roughly into her, and she rocks back and forth, crying out and gasping and grunting, with her head thrown back. No loud screaming, but she makes being-roughly-fucked noises. Then, sadly, she begs him to give her more. Which he does, but the fire has gone out of the scene as a nonconsensual sex encounter. (The husband shows up later on satisfied that his wife now appreciates cock, but complaining that she makes him dress up as The Rapeman when he fucks her. That was pretty funny.)

The plot develops with no additional rapes. We see a brief bootleg video of a school student blindfolded and being raped in a white room. (We see the video clip on two occasions.) Keisuke (The Rapeman's secret identity) recognizes her as one of his students who just turned up in a suspicious suicide. (Yes, she was blackmailed and murdered.) More plot developments, in which we identify the Bad Women who will feel the wrath of The Rapeman's mighty cock: a female police officer and a fellow school teacher who helps line up female student victims.

First up, the female police officer. She and another female officer are on patrol in a car. The Rapeman steps out in front of their car and they screech to a halt and the other officer gets out. The Rapeman threatens her with his knife, drags her off to the side, and cuff her to the bridge. He forces the Bad Female Police Officer back into the car and drives into an alley. He pulls her out of the car and handcuffs one wrist to the door frame. He tears open her uniform top to reveal her naked breasts. Then he bends her over the hood of the car, strips off her skirt and panties, and rapes her from the rear. In one nice camera angle, from inside the car, we get to see her breasts being mashed into the windshield as he fucks her. She keeps her police hat on the entire time, though, so if seeing girls dressed as police officers getting raped is one of your fetishes, this one's for you. He rapes he into unconsciousness, but not before she tells him where to find the other bad guys.

A random bad guy enters the room where two blackmailed schoolgirls are waiting for "help." He starts groping and feeling them up. They scream and fight. There are several cuts away for some plot development during the attempted rape scene. The bad guy wrestles one girl onto the bed and throws the other one across the room. He is having difficulty making headway with the girl on the bed when The Rapeman barges in and decks him. The girls flee.

The Rapeman finds the female schoolteacher next. She is coked out of her head, having had difficulty reconciling her duty as a teacher with her evil ways. The Rapeman takes her to the room where the schoolgirls were being raped and tears open her dress and pushed her back on the bed, clothed only in her white bra and panties. He whips out his knife and runs it up and down her body. He cuts off her panties, grabs one of her ankles, and lifts it high into the air, forcing her to recline back onto the bed. He leans over and starts fucking her hard. She throws her head back. Victim sounds and rough sex motion follows. One wrist is cuffed to the bed. She is still wearing her bra, but he rips it off to reveal her breasts. He rapes her some more until she reveals the hidden room in which the Big Bad Guy is watching the rape. The Rapeman knocks him out, and then takes the time to really beat the shit out of him.

There is a nice but sad denouement.

So in conclusion, we have three rapes. The rape of the lesbian wife who is made to see the error of her ways at the end of which it turns consensual. But it's pretty good up until then. Then there's the rape of the female police officer, which was actually pretty good. Nudity and violent sex, plus she wore her police hat the whole time. The final rape of the schoolteacher was not really as satisfying. She made initial sounds of protest, but it's like she knew she had it coming and just stoically took her sexual punishment. She made pained sounds and her body bounced and rocked with the thrusts, but the energy level was kind of low. There was also the video clip of the student being raped, which didn't show much, although she was initially blindfolded for any blindfold fetishists reading this. And there was the consensual lesbian sex scene which was non-explicit and, well, consensual. This one was not as good as the previous two, although I am ashamed to admit it is because the plot got in the way. But still, they might have gone a little farther playing up the schoolgirl rape angle. Or found one more evil female to rape. Four rapes per movie is a good number. Anyway, still a good flick overall and I'll go with a C+ for the rapes.

I downloaded this from Bizarro Video, and I suspect it is available from them on DVD as well. I just didn't see it in my cursory search. I also found it at WTFDVDs and Rezarected. Prior warnings apply, although Sloth did report he had a good experience with WTFDVDs.

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 04:44:39 AM

Name: Brutus

John Galt: Thanks for the Rapeman reviews. I had seen those three movies a long time ago. I liked the first one the most as it was the only one with a gag. I agree that the premise is simply outstanding. And yes, there's no way any Western director would even come near movies likes these, except perhaps Bill Zebub.


Anyhow, here's a non-partisan review of:

B.T.K. (2008).

With some trepidation, I decided to review the latest movie about Dennis L. Rader, the notorious Wichita serial killer known as B.T.K. (Bind them, Torture them, Kill them). It seemed too early to enjoy GIMP scenes in a movie based on the real-life deeds perpetrated by this asshole. But Michael Feifer's film is stated as a fictional representation of Rader. And fortunately, there are a number of inconsistencies with the real-life B.T.K. killer that do indeed make this movie a work of fiction.

So does the movie work? Well, there's certainly a lot of killing but unfortunately for GIMPers, not enough binding and torturing.

The movie starts off in an awesome manner. A voice-over narrative by Rader says stuff like: "I'll stuff your jaws 'til you can't talk. I'll bind your legs 'til you can't walk. I'll tie your hands 'til you can't make a stand."

He has taken a hiatus from killing, and in a yellow-hazed flashback, we see a dusty and battered blond woman in black bra and panties struggling against her bonds in a shallow grave. Her wrists are tied in front and connected by rope to her bound ankles so she can't reach the rather convincing duct tape gag wrapped over her mouth. Rader starts choking her, and we get some good close-ups of her face. He follows with some punches until she's dazed, then he steps on her face before delivering the death blow with his boot. As he buries her, the opening credits roll with some quick blurry shots of his bound victims and the crime scenes.

After that excellent start, B.T.K. becomes WTF? Rader gets a young and sexy strawberry blond call girl sent to his hotel room and pulls out some rope. But does he tie her up? NO! He asks her to tie HIM up, which she does, and then takes off with his money. I guess that during his extended layoff from killing, he forgot that he's supposed to be the one doing the tying. However, his anger at getting ripped off seems to serve as the catalyst for restarting his serial killing ways.

Rader is played by Kane Hodder, whose face may not be familiar without the hockey mask. (He played Jason in some of the Friday the 13th movies.) Hodder is a tall, heavy-set guy with a big moustache and glasses. When he's "normal," he looks like the type of guy you'd see at a bar, give a playful punch in the arm, and say, "Ya big lug."

But the more we see of Rader, even in his non-killing mode, the more we realize that this guy is a total asshole. He's married with two teenage daughters and works as a city parks compliance officer. His days are spent driving around in his white van and giving tickets and warnings to women for such minor infractions as blocking a sidewalk in a driveway and even having "too high" front-lawn grass. (This was apparently what the real B.T.K. killer was like.)

Rader is actually scoping out future victims, especially the ones who get in his face after he annoys them so much with his over-the-top power trip.

His first victim is an MILF with a nice body. The woman is woken up in the middle of the night by sounds from downstairs. After she investigates, Rader appears, pushes her against a wall and pulls out a gun. He binds her wrists with rope as she sobs. With his beefy hand around her throat, Rader tells her he is not getting enough sex at home and he can't control his testosterone-fueled urges.

He slowly pulls out a plastic dry cleaning bag and swiftly covers her face as she pleads "no no." After she stops breathing, Rader examines his handiwork, but she gasps for breath and so he finishes the job. Asphyx fans will probably like this scene as it lasts for a good 80 seconds and really shows the life being sucked out of the victim with the plastic clinging to her face.

But for me, the only torture I saw in the scene was the fact that the woman had to listen to Rader talk about his sexual problems.

Rader's home life appears to be rather normal, except when he sneaks out to a workshop where he plans his next crime. His naive but loving wife asks what he's up to. He says he has to work late because, you know, the workday never ends for a parks compliance officer.

So on his late-night shift, Rader breaks into the home of a large-chested blonde who had earlier given him some lip when he warned her about her dog on the loose. She arrives home with her boyfriend. Rader shoots the boyfriend and blood splatters all over blondie. He forces her on the bed and strangles her with his latex-glove-covered hands. No binding. No torture. No nudity. And no satisfaction for the GIMP viewer with this scene.

The next day, Rader is approached by a cute teen looking for her dog. He pretends he has her dog in the back of his van, so when she takes a look, he hits her head with a night stick and shoves her in. Then we get the obligatory "close-call" scene where he's almost caught.

The teen's body is later seen wrapped in plastic, wrists tied and connected to her bound ankles in a shallow grave in the woods. Rader is in a similar position beside her. Ah, he's just posing for his camera set on a timer. The killer exits the pit, unties himself, and after a bit of small talk with the terrified girl, he thrusts a shovel into her gut and twists it around.

The final pseudo GIMP scene occurs when Rader, pretending to be on a camping trip as leader of the boy scouts, finds the call girl who ripped him off (she dropped her driver's license in her flight). He forces his way into her apartment and shoots her husband in the head.

He knocks the hooker unconscious. I was expecting her to awaken all tied up with Rader exacting his torturous revenge. After all, he's an arrogant sadist who loves power and hates women, especially those who fail to fall in line. But alas, she's lying next to dead hubby, her face covered in blood and left eye swollen shut. She is not bound, not gagged and not even naked.

Rader lectures her about respect and a woman's place in the world, and starts strangling her while explaining what she'll experience on her way to death. Then it gets to the WTF stage. The bloody hooker turns into Rader's oldest daughter. Rader is confused, and so am I. He leaves without killing the woman, who has reverted back to the hooker.

The rest of the film is a mishmash of the police investigation, revelations that Rader wasn't a good father ("He never once helped me with my homework!") plus some rather phony emotional family scenes and his eventual arrest and confession.

As a low-budget movie, B.T.K. isn't terrible, but it missed the mark in many ways. It seems that Michael Feifer was trying to shove too many aspects of the real B.T.K. into the movie, leaving us with incomplete developments about his family life, the investigation and Rader's psychological conflict, which is told mainly through first-person monologues.

There are some chilling scenes, particularly when Rader talks a young girl into his van and she soon realizes she has made a horrible mistake, and his stalking of the MILF. Hodder did a plausible job as the villain, but I can't say the same for his co-stars.

GIMP-wise, I must say that B.T.K. went downhill fast after its most promising start. Asphyx aficionados may enjoy some of the killings, but I found nothing really sexy about them. And there was no nudity to speak of throughout the film.

The bottom line is that the film lacked binding and torturing. Rader's MO in the movie could have been Annoy them, Stalk them and Suffocate them, but being called the A.S.S. Killer might not have worked. Oh well, the film didn't either.

My rating for both the movie and GIMP scenes: C-

Asian Cult Cinema

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 06:36:05 AM

Name: Thanagar

I guess I should've been more explicit in my post from Monday. I have no problems with discussions on this forum of how government action or inaction impacts the adult industry, especially bondage porn. I was specifically objecting to political advocacy in the middle of reviews or other unrelated commentary. I've noticed numerous instances of this in recent years.

To cite a few examples: 1)The film critic in my local paper didn't like the current "W" film because it didn't slam Bush nearly enough to suit him 2) a blogger I follow who writes cartoons for TV couldn't resist taking a cheap shot at a member of the current administration during a comment about Casper the Friendly Ghost(!?) 3) An automobile reviewer for the Washington Post (a black guy) felt the need to inject his opinions about "The Dukes of Hazzard" and the Confederate flag during a review of the new Dodge Charger 4) leftist TV host Keith Olbermann took a gratuitous shot at Gov. Sarah Palin while hosting a recap of Sunday's games on NBC's "Sunday Night Football."

So, once again, can we all agree to stifle the need to promote candidates in the midst of a freakin' bondage flick review? When some kid reads it in the archives twenty years from now, he probably won't know what the hell you're going on about anyway.

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 08:50:27 AM

Name: Dan Hawke
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:


A buddy in the biz had once given me the URL of a website for hiring folks to work in adult businesses. Not just models, but webmasters, programmers and such.

I've misplaced the URL and couldn't seem to find it with my search terms in google. Anyone out there know of such a place -- basically a help wanted/job search board for adult business.

Hopefully this isn't too far off topic and Ralphus will let the post stand. BTW, I am looking for a LINUX system administrator, if anyone here wants to contact me. Be warned, there will be a test!


Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 09:26:57 AM

Name: Dan Hawke
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:


A buddy in the biz had once given me the URL of a website for hiring folks to work in adult businesses. Not just models, but webmasters, programmers and such.

I've misplaced the URL and couldn't seem to find it with my search terms in google. Anyone out there know of such a place -- basically a help wanted/job search board for adult business.

Hopefully this isn't too far off topic and Ralphus will let the post stand. BTW, I am looking for a LINUX system administrator, if anyone here wants to contact me. Be warned, there will be a test!


Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 09:26:57 AM

Name: John Galt

Thanagar: I take your point, but in reality it applies to any pop cultural reference, not just political ones. Personally, I am not writing for an audience 20 years down the road, I am writing for today. Pop culture references impart a sense of immediacy, and a feeling that the reader is in on the joke. Pop culture references take advantage of current events to add zest or humor or irony, even--or especially--when inserted in a tangential or non-sequitur or juxtapositional way. I use pop cultural references a lot, as I'm sure you've noticed. I reference comic books, Monty Python, celebrities, The Simpsons, South Park, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, other movies and TV shows, politics and politicians, and much more. I have no illusions that everyone picks up on all of my references, but oh well.

If my writing survives, it will need to be copiously footnoted to explain the references. (It might even benefit from having them footnoted now.) It wouldn't be overstating the obvious to say that's an awful big if. But if that happened, I would be in good company. Shakespeare's plays are all heavily footnoted to explain 16th century English culture references and puns. Even Harlan Ellison's "Repent Harlequin!" Said the Ticktockman was heavily footnoted in my 70s high school textbook to explain literary and cultural references, and it was written in the mid 60s. I love them both, even if I did have to read a footnote to get some of the jokes.

You mentioned that you were annoyed by gratuitous (pop cultural targets of opportunity, in a sense) attacks on George W. Bush, a member of the current administration, the Confederate flag, and Sarah Palin. I sense you and I do not share similar political views, seeing as how I believe the current administration has done serious damage to the nation, the Confederate flag is a focal icon around which racists rally, and Sarah Palin is a caricature of everything that is wrong with the current state of the GOP. And as such they are all fair game for parody and pillory. The good news is, if Obama wins, he and his administration will be the new focus for snarky political gratuitous sniping instead. Although, sadly, I don't think the reputation of the Confederate flag is going to be sufficiently salvaged in my lifetime.


But hey! This is a GIMP forum! And I just happen to have a new review of an old movie handy to get things back on track. I know you've all seen it, but let's take a trip back to the halcyon days of the mid-70s, when XXX movies were in their glory days before the advent of VCRs. This one features a little-seen hot porn star lead actress who gets raped a lot. Who could ask for more?

I mentioned in an earlier post about Bizarro Video that they had a tendency to rename movies at random, so if you weren't careful you might accidentally buy something you had already seen. If they do that on purpose, it is kind of rotten. This was just such a movie, although since I was a member of the site at the time, I just downloaded it. Bizarro Video called it Seven Years Too Long, but it was actually A Dirty Western. Since I hadn't seen it for years, it took me almost 15 minutes to figure out I saw it way back when. But since I watched it again, I thought I would go ahead and review it since it is inexplicably not in the reviewed films database. The only pop culture reference below is to "Happy Days," so you can relax, Thanagar.


A Dirty Western (1975)

A Dirty Western is a western. There is a remote ranch with an attractive mother and three attractive daughters, all alone. (The menfolk--or in this case manfolk--rode off on an errand.) There are three escaped and horny convicts. That adds up to rape in my book.

We begin with a standard XXX sex scene between the husband and his wife. She is the hot Barbara Bourbon, who played Pamela Mann in the adult classic, The Private Afternoons of Pamela Mann. She has incredibly sexy breasts.

The convicts ride in. The head convict surprises the mother in the cabin. He tells her to undress, and when she doesn't comply fast enough, he tears her blouse. He clears the table, and when she has finished undressing, he lays her back on it and starts fucking her. She isn't fighting, but she is making helpless and humiliated noises, and she makes sounds like she is being hurt, although they don't really ring true. But you can pretend. He threatens her with a gun, telling her to do what he says or else.

The other two convicts catch sight of the three lovely daughters. They are naked, whacking each other with their clothes after having just been skinny dipping in the nearby pond. Of course. The head convict walks the mother outside, completely naked except for her black cowboy boots. They all meet up and the two other convicts grope and grab at the naked daughters. The mother tells them she will do anything they want if she'll leave her daughters alone.

They go into the barn. One convict gets the mother down on her hands and knees and fucks her doggie style. She rocks forward with his thrusts and makes pained faces, but there's only background music. The second convict moves around in front of her and makes her suck his cock. So they both do her for a while, but all you hear is background music and the guys laughing and having a great time. The three naked daughters just huddle fearfully off to the side, watching these guys double team mom.

They decide to take the daughters with them. The dirty liars! They take the mother outside, tie her wrists and ankles with leather thongs, and hang her from a rope. So she ends up with her ankles tied together, AOH, suspended a few feet off the ground. You can tell she's not really hanging by her wrists, though, because her arms are bent. The convict who strung her up takes a moment to lick her pussy. She cries in shame and humiliation, which is kind of nice.

Meanwhile, the convict guarding the girls makes one of them give him a hand job. When the convicts finally leave, they take the girls and leave the mother hanging outside the barn, crying. All the women are still naked.

The posse chasing the convicts finally reach the ranch and find the mother hanging in front of the barn. They take her down and untie her and get the story from her. Then they're off in pursuit!

Meanwhile, the convicts are riding along, each with a naked girl in the saddle with them. The convicts reach a watering hole and decide to frolic with the girls in the pond. The girls don't really sell being frightened hostages during this scene. Next, they trudge on up the hill and find shelter under an overhang. Once settled, the convicts' thoughts turn carnal again.

The head convict pulls one of the girls off to the side. She struggles to get away, but he pulls her back by her hair and violates her. She screams like it really hurt and whimpers and moans as he fucks her. This might have been supposed to be the youngest daughter, and a virgin. He sticks a gag in her mouth to quiet her screams. She does a good job of being raped. He leaves her laying on the ground, crying.

The three convicts fall asleep, and the girls get together and scheme to fuck the convicts into a stupor. What a great plan. There goes the nonconsensual aspect of sex from now on. They aren't horny any more, though, so the girls go down on each other to get them horny. For all intents and purposes, as a rape movie this flick has just jumped the shark. Overcome by lust, the convicts join in. It is just one big consensual sex fest at this point.

The posse catches up. The girls knock one convict out with a rifle. Another one gets shot and falls off the cliff, and the head convict gets wounded. He tries to crawl away. The mother (who accompanied the posse) flashes back on her rape, meaning we get to see a brief flashback as well, then shoots the head convict dead. The end.

So, we have three rape scenes. First, the mother being raped on the table in the cabin by the head convict, which was pretty good. Nice sounds and body movement. Excellent nudity. Second, the mother being raped on all fours, in the barn, being double-teamed by the other two convicts. Also a good rape scene, although swelling background music covers most of the victim sounds. Still excellent nudity. Third, one of the daughters being raped under the overhang by the head convict. This rape featured an improvised gag to muffle her screams, since this rape had the most realistic sounding victim noises. Full nudity again. All rape scenes were XXX sex.

There is the hanging bondage pussy licking and the impromptu hand job thrown in for good measure. There is some underwater fellatio during the pond frolicking scene, but that whole scene plays out as more consensual than anything else. In addition, there was the XXX sex scene between husband and wife at the start of the flick (consensual) and the XXX sex scene between the girls and the convicts under the overhang (also consensual). One brief gag. One unconvincing bondage suspension. Although the rapes could have been more intense, they were not bad. I would give this a B in good conscience.

I downloaded this (under the misleading title "Seven Years Too Long") from Bizarro Video. It is available on DVD for $24.95 in the "Classic Roughies" section under its correct title of A Dirty Western.

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 10:50:28 AM

Name: Kevin

I am totally shocked that the people on this forum actually think that this Obama wise guy is going to do anything for the adult industry and the laws that hamper it. I am not a member of any party, but Sarah Palin makes much more sense than Obama. Obama is what is wrong with this country, and he is in no way going to help we who like our porn. I know I will get a lot of flack for saying this, but I thought Democrats were the party of "love" and "kindness" and "tolerance."

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 11:49:30 AM

Name: Matt
E-mail address:

Different Administrations have different priorities, and that is often the decision of the Attorney General. One may assume that an Obama Administration would have more of a focus of the FBI and Justice Department's resources on Counter-Terrorism (the largest threat we have today), Organized Crime, and counterespionage, than on enforcing obscenity laws. A McCain Administration would continue the status quo.

While it is political suicide for sexual liberation to be an issue for any political candidate, the Federal Courts are the best bet for overturning obscenity laws and setting aside any prosecutions on appeal. It depends on who you get as the trial judge to hear the suit, and the makeup of the appeals court should one lose.

But to assume that a GOP-appointed judge will always be conservative and a Democrap appointed judge always being liberal is not a good idea. Presidents have appointed judges who they thought were conservative or liberal and been unpleasantly surprised.

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 05:40:01 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

Brutus: Terrific review of BTK. I'll give the movie a pass but I really enjoyed reading your take on it. By the way, I don't think I've ever called someone in a bar a "big lug." I sure hope I haven't.


John Galt said, of A Dirty Western:

I know you've all seen it....

OK, that one hurt. Believe me, I've been trying for months to find this movie, but so far no sign of it in my so-called liberal country.

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 05:45:09 PM

Name: John Galt

Matt said: ...and a Democrap appointed judge...

I'm just going to pretend that was a typo. ;)


A Canadian: Sorry. A Dirty Western has just been around for so long. Maybe I should have said I know Ralphus has seen it... instead. If you are really dying of curiosity you could do the Bizarro Video membership for a month and download it. The quality is not all that great, of course.

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 06:41:12 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:,6TOwue7prOm/

John Galt: Thanks for the tip. Unfortunately, I'm just not a download kind of guy.

I am an upload kind of guy, though, and that brings me to the comment Ralphus made the other day about Attackers JBD-108 and how it was on his shortlist of best movies of 2007. I suspect many GIMPers are curious about the thought process Ralphus uses for choosing the best films. I hope to explore this a bit further this weekend when I upload some clips to YouTied.

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 07:08:20 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Thanks for taking the time to complete the Rapeman trilogy. It's a completely different world in Japan. I love how a masked man who rapes women can be thought of as a hero. "I am the symbol of man"...too funny. Before I die, I want to go to Japan and learn about the sensibilities of the Japanese culture. I wonder what it's like to be a woman living in that country? Is it that they know their place, and that's to be subservient to men? And yet real-life rapes are very low in Japan, especially compared to ours. Think it has something to do with the type of entertainment they get to enjoy, probably without shame? It's just a fascinating subject to me.

Anyway, here's the links to The Rapeman 2 and The Rapeman 3.

I saw A Dirty Western during the early days of my video store career. It was the very first segment from an actual adult movie that I ever collected on my highlights tape. I kept the initial rape scene with Barbara Bourbon (we have several stills from it in my Homepage URL above), and also the scene where she's suspended by her wrists. Yeah, they did fake the suspension in the closeup shots, but if you look again toward the end of the scene, there's a few full body shots where they show her actually hanging suspended and spinning around helplessly for a few seconds.

That was damn exciting for me to see, because that was probably the first time I ever saw a woman actually hanging by her wrists. In fact, it's pretty rare if I see that in a movie that I DON'T get turned on by that. It looks painful, and I've even tried to hoist myself up by my wrists for a few seconds and hang on with my feet dangling, and I can usually only take it for a short time before I get sore, so I can imagine what it's like to do that to a woman in real life.

Added to the Reviews page under Classic Adult here:


Brutus: Ya big lug. That was a typical Brutus review, entertaining, informative and also full of your humorous perspectives. I loved the line at the end about the A.S.S. Killer. What really sucks, though, that no one seems to be able to make a decent film about this guy. You would think the BTK story would be rife with possibilities for some nasty bondage-torture segments, but apparently not this one and not the one that Ulli Lommel made either, and he's made a whole career out of films with bondage themes (Devonsville Terror, Boogeyman, etc). When is somebody going to make a mainstream GIMP film that actually delivers?

The direct link to your review is here:

Thanks once again to anyone who takes the time to actually review a movie for the forum. You guys are the best.

Thursday, October 23rd 2008 - 11:07:51 PM

Name: Scheer

A Canadian I was like you initially in that I was reluctant to download material, buying tapes and dvds. But circumstances meant that downloads became my only option for porn.

Downloads opened up a whole new, and in some areas, bigger, range of material. I'm talking about downloading from legitimate sites, like actionjav, or Powerschotz, although I have lately been looking at Rapidshare for difficult to find material (thanks BBfan!). Whilst it takes a bit of learning, and a couple of software programmes, and of course some sort of broadband connection (mine is only 2MB, equivalent to download times of 240KB/sec) it's not so difficult. I download, edit and put the films onto a DVD and delete it from my PC.

I don't know if it's appropriate here, but if anyome is interested in exactly how I do this, what software I use and how I overcome any difficulties, I can put together a post on the subject.

Friday, October 24th 2008 - 12:53:26 AM

Name: jhlipton
E-mail address:

I'll tie your hands 'til you can't make a stand.

One has an image of the population of Wichita zipping down the sidewalks on their hands! (At least, I do!)


You would think the BTK story would be rife with possibilities for some nasty bondage-torture segments

You might think that, but remember this if the BTK'er from freaking Wichita. From what I've read, he really was weak on all GIMP traditions.


I'm going to stay out of the political discussions (other than to say that it looks like we're going to have an adult for President, at last), but if someone thinks that Sarah Palin is better at **anything** than Barrack Obama, I'd like what you're smoking, please.

Friday, October 24th 2008 - 01:21:42 AM

Name: Sloth
E-mail address:

Mornin All

Brutus - thanks so much for the heads up review on "BTK" - what a shame - may do a rental for asphyx purposes only to add to a comp though I doubt it will appear in my part of the country.

I notice on your review of "The Torturer" you did not give it a letter grade. After watching that a second time allow me to add a few thoughts. So we have "giallo meets Hostel 2". I grant the staging of Gimp scenes was far better in Hostel but found the pacing far better in Torturer, never having to wait long for the next torment whether good or bad. Did you find the ending as amusing as I did? The "hero" escorts his lady love out of the mansion and simply leaves the other three chicks to slowly bleed to death I guess. Now that's my kind of hero. Overall, I think a B- would be my rating and would like to know yours.

jhlipton - not smoking anything but using much harder substances I can imagine one thing Sarah would be better at than Obama. I can certainly imagine a scenario where a naked, gagged and racked Sarah Palin would be far preferable to a similar Barack Obama. Just my personal thing :)

John Galt, you review machine - guess I'll have to view a couple of "Rapeman" segments - gotta love those zany Japanese right. Thanks for the info on all those - saw "A Dirty Western" many years ago - enjoyed all the scenes with mom, less so with the daughters.

Ralphus - they probably will never make a mainstream movie that gets it right - god, for the days of witch torture movies again - I think I mentioned it before but avoid Ulli Lommel's version of "BTK" at all costs - what a piece of crap that is, practically unwatchable.

And now, as in every election cycle, my rant on any of these politicos and their effect on Gimpdom - it just doesn't matter - they are all, ALL, evil and their only goal is to maintain power and control over everyone, the only difference being in the method used. Forgive me but I simply have to unload that somewhere.

Now, off to Video Mayhem to place an order under the new system - I'll let you all know if it works well.

Stay Well All

Friday, October 24th 2008 - 06:13:59 AM

Name: Brutus

Thanks guys for the feedback on B.T.K. And now maybe I can learn to spell Rader (not Radar) right. Thanks Ralphus for fixing that. Is it just me or are most movies about real serial killers sorely lacking in the GIMP department?

jhlipton wrote about BTK: From what I've read, he really was weak on all GIMP traditions.

I believe that is true. For example, I don't think he ever raped any of his victims, but instead whacked off in their houses.


Sloth: Man, you are one tough critic. I thought "The Torturer" was one of the better mainstream films of recent years. Given the variety of tortures and the attractiveness and sometimes nudity of the victims, I might have gone as high as a B-plus. However, it could be that the movie stands out because of the flood of disappointing crap I've seen. I was also amused by the ending, but I didn't care much for the last torture with the heroine in the water.

You also wrote: ... saw "A Dirty Western" many years ago - enjoyed all the scenes with mom, less so with the daughters.

I'm assuming you didn't mean you watched the movie with your mom and your daughters :-)


John Galt: Ah yes, I was also disappointed with the last parts of "A Dirty Western." It was damn entertaining up to that point. And for what it's worth, I've never heard the movie being called "Seven Years Too Long."


A Canadian: Wouldn't downloading allow you more access to the ton of GIMP material that isn't available in Canada? I'm not sure how strict the Canadian authorities monitor such activity, if at all, but downloading seems a safer route than having stuff delivered by mail. Just a thought.

Friday, October 24th 2008 - 08:43:21 AM

Name: Thanagar
Homepage URL:

Ah, I remember A Dirty Western. In 1976, I was a projectionist at a small movie theatre that, a couple of months into my employment, was abruptly bought out and converted into an adult movie house. Not surprisingly, I stayed on, and got my first ever look at porn, including A Dirty Western. I was mightily impressed at the time, but I have no idea what I would think of it now. For the budget-minded who want to investigate it, Adult Video Universe has it for $16.49.

Friday, October 24th 2008 - 11:03:38 AM

Name: mr beaver

Mr. Scheer would love to know how you make workable DVDs from internet downloads.

As to Wichita, BTK may be mild, but read about the Wichita massacre that happened years ago as it has some gimp worthy parts to it. Also read about the Seacrest Diner incident that happened about 20 years ago on the East coast.

Friday, October 24th 2008 - 11:53:32 AM

Name: purpleviking
E-mail address:

Hey Ralphus, love the pic you have up today. I like the girl in peril type stuff. Would love to see Rick do a movie using the same plot.

As far as the election goes, at times I get sick of both parties. There is a lot of blame to go around for every one. It just seems like they don't really care about us average folks. But on a brighter note I still have a job.

Hopefully, our many lovely ladies who add to this great forum will keep on enlightening us with their thoughts and dreams of what we love the most on here.

As always I love reading what everyone contributes. Keep it coming.


Friday, October 24th 2008 - 12:28:30 PM

Name: Rick
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Greetings Gimpers,

Well it's once again election time in the US of A. There is a lot of hope this time that we will get a breath of fresh air as we did during the 90's and get out from under the oppressive thumb of the religious right.

Last time in 04, I threw down a long dissertation but this time I think Ralphus summed it up perfectly, so I won't bore you with a long speech. The only thing I would add is that the next President, who could be Sarah Palin if John McCain dies, will be putting 2 or 3 Supreme Court Justices on the court. McCain has stated he wants to put more right wing guys on there. I think it would be very bad for the country and I don't want to see women forced to give birth to children they don't want.

I think a Democrat victory would be good for racial healing in the country, and I don't think Obama is in the pocket of oil interests like McCain. We need electric cars, and we need them now. America could be the innovator and save our automakers...McCain is not going to help unseat his masters control over us.

I think McCain is a good man, but it's who he brings with him that worry's me, and 4 more years of a hyper hostile atmosphere is not warming the cockles of my heart.

Are we better off than we were before Bush? I don't think there is anyone that would say yes. It's been one catastrophe after another. I think McCain will continue the same path and if Holy Roller Sarah gets in, look out.

John Galt: I enjoyed your politically charged review, obviously you had tongue firmly in cheek. It's interesting how filmmakers who probably believe in something completely different obviously use stereotypes to play to the fantasies of the viewer. It is simultaneously repugnant and titillating.

I think this is why I find myself drawn to these types of scenes as a filmmaker. You peel back the mask of civility and see what's down there. If you can tap into it, and release it, there is a lot of satisfaction there.

Brutus: BTK Review: The bottom line is that the film lacked binding and torturing. Rader's MO in the movie could have been Annoy them, Stalk them and Suffocate them, but being called the A.S.S. Killer might not have worked. Oh well, the film didn't either.

ROFL! Definitely some plot potential there...


Friday, October 24th 2008 - 06:21:45 PM

Name: zee-ef-ex

A Dirty Western? Wow, that brings back memories.

I have that movie on VHS. I remember the first time I saw it I was impressed. But after that I have rarely watched it again.

You know how sometimes context plays a role in your rating of a flik? A Dirty Western was like that for me. I must have been going through a drought at the time, because I liked it enough to keep it at first.

But the flik got old quick. And a year or two ago, when I watched it for the first time in many years, I said to myself, "What were you thinking?" As time has gone by the movie has gathered increasing suckage for me.

Part of it is that context thing. I used to grade papers for a college professor. I remember how the grading process was so random. You read five awful papers in a row and you're despairing for the state of the world. Then you read a paper that is just moderately better, but in comparison to the five that came before it, it is so much better that you say, "Fuck it" and give it an A. Or the reverse - read 3 great papers in row, and pity the poor next guy who just can't spell. Under other circumstances maybe you would have given him a B, but after reading that great paper? A C for you, sucka.

You try not to be biased like this and affected by what came before, you try so hard to be objective, but context rules. A lot of porn is like that, too.

Another thing is that A Dirty Western just hasn't aged well. In keeping with the recent poll question, this flik is a good test case. Back in the 70s, the 80s, we tolerated semi-attractive women. After being spoiled by the hotties of today who are actually doing porn, those women from the 70s look pretty bleak.

The Golden Age is a trade off. A lot of the women are not all that. But, on the other hand, sometimes they were going all out. Some of those movies will last for all time (like Barbara Broadcast). Others, like A Dirty Western? Pffft.


Friday, October 24th 2008 - 11:21:40 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

zee-ef-ex: Your point about context is a good one. I suspect every GIMPer who's been around for a while has had the exact same experience -- you revisit a porn film you once loved and wonder what you ever saw in that film (an experience, of course, that also applies to other areas beyond porn films). I know there are some people who worry that it's a sign of getting jaded. But in reality, it simply means your standards have changed as you have been exposed to better material. On a personal note, I should probably also thank you for helping me to better understand some of the C papers from my college days.


Brutus: I wouldn't feel too bad about the whole Rader/Radar thing. After all, there were rumors the BTK Killer slept with a teddy bear.


Sloth wrote:

not smoking anything but using much harder substances I can imagine one thing Sarah would be better at than Obama. I can certainly imagine a scenario where a naked, gagged and racked Sarah Palin would be far preferable to a similar Barack Obama. Just my personal thing :)

jhlipton probably would like what I'm smoking (but not inhaling). Anyway, I agree -- I can imagine more than one example where my preference would be to get all mavericky on Sarah Palin, rather than Barack.


Rick wrote:

Well it's once again election time in the US of A.

This is making me feel nostalgic. It was about this time four years ago (on Oct. 26, 2004, to be exact) that I first discovered the GIMP board. As you can imagine, election talk was a hot topic at that time, too, although it seemed a lot more heated back then -- probably because change wasn't in the air.

I found this site by accident in 2004, as I was googling information about -- who else? -- Lisa Kinkaid. The past four years have been quite a ride. I've met quite a cast of characters here and learned about a wealth of GIMP movies (porn and mainstream). And I fulfilled my original mission, discovering many new and terrific Lisa Kinkaid movies.

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 03:52:50 AM

Name: YikYakker

Am I mistaken, or was Dirty Western originally released in 3-D?

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 12:52:41 PM

Name: YikYakker
Homepage URL:

Anybody out there have a clue about the name of this movie with Denise Crosby in a perilous situation?

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 01:03:19 PM

Name: Thanagar
Homepage URL:

According to Brian's Page, it's a tv series called "Baxter."

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 01:19:50 PM

Name: John Galt

Denise Crosby pictures are from the first season of the ShowTime original series, "Dexter." Great show. The series is about a serial killer (Dexter) and features bondage, brief torture (he always takes a blood sample using a scalpel) and then murder. Unfortunately, the victims are usually men, although the end of the second season did feature him doing a hot gal (Jaime Murray) arsonist.

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 02:09:00 PM

Name: Thanagar

That's what I get for talking to a ditsy girl on the phone while I'm typing.

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 02:36:16 PM

Name: John Galt

Here is another oldie but goodie, so this is for historical purposes and to fill out the reviews database. A Jess Franco classic from the mid-70s starring Lina Romay back when she was hot. This flick involves electro-torture, and Krisi was kind enough to post the electro-torture scenes to YouTied.


Barbed Wire Dolls (AKA Frauengefangnis) (1975)

Barbed Wire Dolls begins with a cruel jailer in a cell with a somewhat less-than-attractive naked girl who has a collar around her neck which is attaching her to the cell wall by a chain. There is a bowl of food just out of her reach. Every time she reaches for the food, the jailer snaps his whip at her or whips her (it is difficult to tell). She is begging and pleading for food. She is dying of hunger and will do anything they want her to do. (If she were to turn around and reach her feet out, instead of using her hands, she could easily snag the bowl of food and drag it back toward her. I'm just saying.)

Cut to titles and credits. This is a Jess Franco WIP film, starring his (second and current) muse, Lina Romay. She was 21 at the time of this film's release. While the credits are flashing, we get a travelogue of the terrain and prison, all via that stationary camera pan and zoom method Franco always employs.

We see three women in a cell, one of which is the naked chained girl (no longer naked or chained) who sounds like she's crazy. The second girl is kind of quiet. The third one is on her back on her cot with her legs spread and not wearing underwear and the camera is always focused on her hairy crotch. She is the horny one.

Lina Romay is the newest prisoner. She gets a lecture by the warden, a butch looking gal wearing really short shorts and a white shirt belted with a wide black leather belt. She is also holding a crop. And she wears a monocle. I haven't seen one of those since Colonel Klink in Hogan's Heroes. Prisoner Lina is made to sign a release allowing them to subject her to shock therapy.

Sure enough, two days later we hear screams and follow them to a cell with a naked Lina Romay stretched out face down and bound AOH to the metal springs of a cot, being shocked. So, electro-torture less than 10 minutes into the movie. There are several flashes and blackouts during Lina's torture. I'm not sure whether that is a cinematic choice or we're to believe the power is flickering during her electro-torture.

Cut to some government official's office. He orders a woman to undress. She offers her body to him and touches him and he freaks. He practically throws her onto the bed. He doesn't like being touched by sluts, he tells us under his breath. He calls in Nestor, his bodyguard (who looks a little like Harry Hamlin) and says she's all yours. Nestor climbs into bed, threatens to whip her if she talks about this, and strokes her, fingers her, kisses her, and off-camera fucks her. The official stands with his back to the action, his mouth twitching.

Typical WIP stuff happens. A prisoner manages to sneak a note out that could have alerted the government or the "liberals" to the torture and abuse going on in the prison. They think the quiet girl did it. The butch warden has the quiet girl brought to her room, where she is in a black negligee, reading a book about Nazi Germany.

The butch warden orders the girl to strip, then crawl over to her bed. She asks if she's still a virgin and when the girl answers in the affirmative she has her lay down on the table on her belly. She strokes her and then sticks her finger into the girl and proclaims, "Someone's been picking cherries." There is some dialog during which the girl admits she wrote the note. They have generally consensual non-XXX sex. Then the girl is taken back to solitary confinement.

In solitary confinement, the girl is wearing a metal collar and she is naked and chained to the wall with a cruel jailer in the cell with her, tormenting her. Sleep deprivation, in this case. I was hoping for something more violent.

The government official asks that the prisoner who wrote the note be delivered to him. The doctor gives her an injection where he really jabs the needle into her thigh hard. So if you like that kind of thing, there you go. She arrives and Nestor is told to take her to the bedroom. There, he undresses her and tells her to masturbate while he watches, which she does and which he watches.

Back in the prison cell, Lina is having a nightmare and is flailing around on the bed spreading her legs and exposing her hairy bush. Her nightmare is the memory of her sleeping in a room naked when her father comes in and tries to have sex with her. She flees, they struggle, she pushes him, he falls and hits his head. This is all in a kind of weird slow motion ballet which robs it of its urgency and violence in my opinion.

Prisoner Lina finds a mouse in her food and refuses to eat it, even though she is assured it will be some added protein. She is taken back to electro-torture, but this time a guard puts a log under her hips to force her butt up in the air and rapes her with a crop until she passes out. Mostly we just see her face as she screams, though.

Prisoner Lina is taken to the infirmary because she was tortured too severely. The doctor has eyes for Lina, who is laying on a cot with her prison gown open, exposing her breasts and bush. The doctor tells her if she comes to him and brings a friend and they are "nice to him," he will protect them both. Uh-huh.

So the doctor has sex with Lina, and it isn't exactly rape and it isn't exactly nonconsensual, but you can tell she isn't having any fun doing it. Next time, she brings the quiet one and the crazy one with her. They kill the doctor and escape. The cruel jailer fastens the horny one face down and with legs spread onto the metal bed frame and brutally, umm, tickles her with his crop, trying to get her to tell where the escapees went. Lots of closeups of her pussy, zooming in and out frequently. Ultimately, he kills her, although it isn't revealed exactly how he did it. He was just tickling her. Another missed GIMP moment.

Meanwhile, out in the jungle, evil guard Nestor and a topless female guard have tracked down the girls. The quiet one runs. Nestor follows, tackles her, and starts to rape her. The crazy one jumps the topless guard and beats her senseless. Lina just watches, then tells the crazy one they must run. Jose, the guard whom we suspect helped the quiet one smuggle the note out (and "picked her cherry," so to speak), suddenly shows up while Nestor is raping the quiet one and machine guns him.

Lina and the crazy one make it to the governor's house but the butch warden is there waiting and shoots them both dead. I think Jose and the quiet one got away and lived happily ever after, but I'm not sure.

So, we start off with the naked bondage and whipping with the not-all-that-attractive crazy girl. However, we quickly proceed to the full-body electro-torture of naked Lina Romay bound hand and foot to the metal bed frame, which was pretty awesome. More bondage featuring the quiet girl but she is only being sleep deprived, which doesn't count as titillating torture in my book. Lina has a dream flashback where her father attempts to rape her. Lina is bound and electro-tortured again and raped with a riding crop. And the horny girl is strapped to the metal bed frame and, apparently, tickled to death. Then there is the one last attempted rape during the escape. Borderline coerced but generally consensual sexual encounters are sprinkled throughout the film. There is a lot of nudity and there are a lot of hairy crotch shots complete with close-ups. No XXX sex. No gags.

Although it could have been more explicit, I have to give high marks for the naked full-body electro-torture scenes. The riding crop rape was a bonus. None of the rapes were very good. This gets a B-, mostly on the strength of that full-body electro-torture. Oh my god would I love to see that done on Sex and Submission or one of those sites. Can you imagine? That would so totally rock.

I came across my copy on Bizarro Video, where I downloaded it, so the quality wasn't all that great. It might be available on DVD as well, but I couldn't find it. And since there is no search engine for the Bizarro DVDs, you just kind of have to click through pages and pages to find what you're looking for. The endeavor exceeded my patience.

I see that Xploited Cinema advertises the DVD for $27.95 and says it is the "Exclusive Unrated Director's Cut Restored from the Original Negative and Archive Footage." According to Krisi, who posted the electro-torture scenes on YouTied, the extended version features a lengthier electro-torture sequence. His post includes both Lina Romay scenes plus the horny girl scene. And they are lengthier than what I saw. Thanks, Krisi!

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 03:50:20 PM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

John Galt: Thanks, your review of Barbed Wire Dolls was another entertaining read. While Women in Prison films seem to always offer some camp fun, I find they can be hit and miss in terms of their GIMP value, and this is probably true for Barbed Wire Dolls. I certainly didn't notice anything in your review that had me thinking I need to see this scene. I'll probably give it a miss.

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 07:08:36 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

Brutus: Since we don't have an official grade from you on The Torturer, care to help me update your review? B or B+?

Regarding changing the name in your BTK review from Radar to Rader, I caught it early on and fixed it right away, because I was hoping no one else would do like I did, which is get the mental image of Gary Burghoff as a serial killer. I'll never be able to watch M*A*S*H in the same way again.


Thanagar: You shouldn't be talking to ditsy girls on the phone, you should be tying them up and doing bad things to them. Unless the phone thing was in preparation for the other thing, in which case, carry on.

Do you know offhand if that print of A Dirty Western that Adult Video Universe carries is the uncut version? I've seen that film from various distributors over the years, and I know that at least one edited version is floating around. The part that I noticed had been cut was the segment where Barbara Bourbon is hanging from her wrists and one of the men licks her pussy (strange they would cut that and not the hardcore rape that preceded it). The Bizarro Video version at least advertises that it is complete and uncut.


Rick: Always a pleasure to see you here posting to the forum. I certainly remembered your long political dissertation from 2004 and was wondering if you were going to do it again with election day coming soon. I appreciate the compliment about my political post, too, thanks. Hopefully all the polls are correct and we'll finally be rid of this regime and can begin a new era of relaxed freedoms for adults to view what they want in the comfort of their own homes. Our long national nightmare is almost over.


John Galt: Thanks so much for another review of a Jess Franco classic. I may just have to order that copy of Barbed Wire Dolls now that the Director's Cut version is finally out on DVD. I have the electric shock sequence from that film in one of my highlights tapes, but it would be nice to have an ungraded copy. Even though that was the only worthwhile segment, it's still an excellent scene and the victim is, of course, the gorgeous Lina Romay. She may not have aged well, but man, back in the mid-1970s, she was one of the all-time great babes. And it helped that she worked with Franco in nearly every film, because he made sure she got fully naked and often tied up and/or tortured in every single movie.

I just got through watching Women Behind Bars for the first time and she has a really nice electro torture scene in that one, too, even though Franco made the mistake of having her hands tied in front, where she could have easily removed the wires that were shocking her pussy, but it was still a hot scene. Anything with Lina rings my bell. Here's the YouTied link:

The direct link to your review is in my Homepage URL above.

Saturday, October 25th 2008 - 11:57:08 PM

Name: Thanagar
Homepage URL:

Ralphus: Strangely enough, I was trying to get together with this particular ditsy girl to do the very thing that you mention, but it didn't happen last night, sadly. But it has in the past, and I even recorded it for posterity once. If I can capture a still from it that won't reveal her face, I'll send it along to you.

I don't know for certain about avu's version of A Dirty Western, but if you look at the page, you'll see the last reviewer claiming that it's the uncut version.

Sunday, October 26th 2008 - 08:32:03 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

In the News: Here's a cute little column from today's Toronto Sun about the BDSM scene in Canada. Nice, isn't it, that bondage enthusiasts can enjoy themselves in Canada, even during tough economic times? Of course, if you're someone who would prefer to sit at home and watch this kind of thing on DVD, that's a whole different matter -- in that case, you're a pervert who's in violation of Canada's obscenity laws. Please, stop me if you've heard this editorial comment before....

Meanwhile, a competing newspaper, the Toronto Star, has this review of Saw V. Doesn't sound like the movie is all that, but more noteworthy to GIMPers is the speculation that "torture porn has definitely had its day." Sadly, that may be true. Meanwhile, I chuckled at the part where they asked where does Jigsaw get the time and money to create his elaborate games. I have to admit, the first time I saw one of these Saw movies, I wondered the same thing.

Sunday, October 26th 2008 - 09:53:35 AM

Name: A Canadian
Homepage URL:

I mentioned on Thursday I was going to try to explore, on YouTied, the criteria Ralphus uses for picking his favorite films. There can probably be no better example of the Ralphus Standard than Attackers JBD-079, the torture movie from 2005.

I reviewed this movie and figured it deserves a B. But Ralphus thinks it is much better than that -- it was his pick for best film of 2005 and he still includes it among his favorites. Apparently, Ralphus enjoys it when two fiends pry open a bound woman's eyelids and then lick her eyeballs. To each his own, I guess.

I have posted some clips from Attackers JBD-079 on YouTied, so everyone can decide for themselves. Here are the links to the clips:

Sunday, October 26th 2008 - 03:07:09 PM

Name: Ralphus
E-mail address:
Homepage URL:

A Canadian: Well, not so much the eyeball licking...that's just kinda bizarre, but it's also extremely funny watching her scream while they do that to her. I'll start by saying that Attackers JB-79 was an odd choice for you to review. Attackers makes torture flicks. I'm a torture guy, you're a rape guy. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, either; in fact, your side probably even has the majority among the readers of this forum.

We're sort of the yin and the yang of the board, which is why it's interesting when we agree and disagree when we have our year-end retrospectives. And for what it's worth, I did see your Best of 2005 pick, the rape movie Shark 231, and my reaction was lukewarm at best. Plenty of rape, but very little bondage and no gags that I remember. Started off well but I was hitting fast-forward by the end. But that's just my reaction. Obviously, you liked it quite a bit more.

That said, I hadn't seen Attackers JB-79 for a few years when I took a look at your YouTied clips, and they reinforced my opinion that this is a great film. It's a movie that starts off rough and never lets up. You could literally hit the chapter up or chapter down buttons and never be disappointed with anything you would happen to land on. Let me bring up a few scenes I especially liked:

  • The exceedingly rough way they bound her to the chair (which you didn't clip), as Randa Mai laughs with glee as he yanks the ropes very tight.
  • The Tabasco sauce scene was just totally audacious...I've never seen anything like that. It's a great torture, IMO. She's coughing and with her mouth forced open, she has to swallow down the stuff...that's so cruel.

  • The harsh whipping she receives to her much so that she sports a nasty red mark on her right breast for the remainder of the film.
  • Plenty of suspensions and candle waxing...they put this poor girl through hell.
  • Now in Attackers films, you expect plenty of torture, but honestly, you don't usually get rape, and in this one, you get bondage rape. Make that screaming bondage rape. And you also left out the excellent segment right before he rapes her, where he continually places swatches of tape over her pussy and then yanks out her pussy hair before he gets down to finally penetrating her.
  • Even though the short clips you posted only covered a small percentage of the action, they did remind me of just how rough and nasty (and especially mean) this film was. I'll gladly stand by my pick that this was the best film of the year, and maybe one of the best bondage films I've seen period.

    Sunday, October 26th 2008 - 05:10:31 PM

    Name: Jim

    On the subject of the BTK movie, it is a shame that given the subject matter so little was done with it...I think part of the problem is fear from Hollywood for reprisal from the right wing "moral majority"...There have been other movies such as "Speck" which could have shown more but didn't. It's funny , you can show copious amounts of blood and gore but show a realisitic bondage scene or anything overtly sexual and they are screaming their heads off.. Today reminds me so much of the 50's where repression was rampant and the economy was stagnant...I'm afraid it isn't going to get better because the Republicans will find some way to steal this election just like baby Bush did.

    Monday, October 27th 2008 - 03:49:09 AM

    Name: Brutus

    Ralphus: I'll give "The Torturer" a B-plus. It's not quite a classic, but it's close IMHO. Plenty of good-looking victims, good bondage for the most part, and relentless sadism.

    As for Gary Burghoff as a serial killer, he actually played one in a movie called "Small Kill." I haven't seen it but the concept is mind-boggling. There's a rather fun review of the movie here. Unfortunately, it seems the victims are kids or male prostitutes.

    A Canadian: Thanks for the links to those articles. I have to disagreee, though. "Torture porn," as it's called now, will still be around, especially after someone comes up with a clever idea that turns into the next blockbuster. Besides, these types of movies have been around long before "Saw" and "Hostel" came out.

    John Galt: As always, thanks for your work. However, WIP movies, including "Barbed Wire Dolls, never seem to ring my bell.

    Monday, October 27th 2008 - 05:44:25 AM

    Name: Sloth
    E-mail address:

    Mornin All

    Brutus - you know, I could quite easily gone as high as a B for "The Torturer", that difference just being a pussy hair here or there - I found it enjoyable viewing and will visit it again - I generally go into these flicks expecting the worst and as such am rarely disappointed - perhaps more of a commentary on the abysmal state of Gimp worthiness in mainstream film - I find a B- to be a pretty high grade for such efforts.

    John Galt - thanks for that review - the only time I saw that was the chopped to pieces version at a drive-in theater in the 70's - too bad most WIP flicks are so consumed with lesbian interaction rather than torment and torture - just a Gimpers lament I guess.

    A Canadian - hey, thanks for those JBD 079 clips - that looks like a fun movie, just the type Ralphus and I could agree on :)

    Stay Well All

    Monday, October 27th 2008 - 09:18:34 AM

    Name: Sloth
    E-mail address:

    Afternoon All

    Just a note to all - ordered 9 flicks from Video Mayhem on Oct. 24 - already received a partial shipment of 5 flicks - it would appear the new ordering system works quite well if this is any indication of things to come - thought I'd fill everyone in on what to expect - thanks VM.

    Monday, October 27th 2008 - 01:09:13 PM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    Sloth: I suppose Attackers JBD-079 may very well be your type of film. I don't think Video Mayhem carries it but you can find the movie at The Candles Room. You can also find it at Canada's own

    Monday, October 27th 2008 - 05:11:16 PM

    Name: Sardu
    Homepage URL:

    Hey all, its been a while since I posted anything, but I've been Anywho, I'd thought I'd post a review of a movie I saw recently that you all might enjoy.

    Naked Fear (2007): Well folks, this is probably the best mainstream DID/ GIMP film I've seen in years, and it immediately belongs on the classics list. The premise of the movie is this: a serial killer kidnaps women, takes them to the remote wilderness, strips them completely naked, and then hunts them ala "The Most Dangerous Game."

    Now, before I continue, this is not a Wave production and is actually a well done thriller. It is shot on film, not video, and the acting is halfway decent.

    The movie starts off with an unnamed naked victim running naked through the wilderness. After a few minutes, the killer injures her with a crossbow, then dispatches her with a handgun.

    Cut to Diana, (the beautiful Danielle De Luca), a drifter who has been hoodwinked into being a stripper. After about 15 minutes of character building, she ends up in the hands of the killer. He takes her to his "torture shed" and apparently does bad things to her, but this is not shown. Only her screams are heard, then he emerges, and goes to clean his bloody pliers. Ouch!

    The next scene is De Luca, completely naked (yes, barefoot too!), in the middle of nowhere. She slowly wakes up, confused and horrified when she realizes her situation. One of the interesting things about the way this is shot is that the camera never "leers" at her nakedness. Yes, she is shown naked, but there are no long, slow shots of her body. No pans, up and down. I think this was a good choice, as it keeps the suspense real, instead of being exploitive.

    For the next 45 minutes of screentime, she is naked, running through the woods, trying to escape the killer.

    While there is no bondage here, the situation is awesome, and the quality is about as good as it can get for this type of film.

    If you read my other reviews, you know I'm not easily impressed, but this one gets my highest recommendation. Enjoy!!

    Tuesday, October 28th 2008 - 04:04:19 AM

    Name: A Canadian
    Homepage URL:

    Sardu: Naked Fear sounds like a lot of fun. I'll be sure to check it out.

    Tuesday, October 28th 2008 - 05:21:43 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Sardu: Thanks for the review of Naked Fear. That film was brought up here on the board earlier this year, although never officially reviewed by our friend jyydubs (whatever happened to him?). Check out his posting in the Guestbook Archives (dated January 12, 2008) in my Homepage URL above. Anyway, he gave it high marks as well, and even linked us with some stills of the naked victims, which I've reproduced here:

    I'd be glad to put your review in the Reviews section if you'll let me know what letter grade you want to give it. Either post it here or else drop me an e-mail.

    Even after reading what both of you had to say about it, I'm still on the fence about this one. Certainly, Danielle De Luca is easy on the eyes, especially if she's naked for a long period of time. Still, no bondage, and the one torture scene is implied only? That's kind of a tease, don't you think? I know you praised the film for being non-exploitive, but exploitation is most definitely a good thing in my book!

    Tuesday, October 28th 2008 - 06:54:32 PM

    Name: Madmax
    E-mail address:

    I LOVE these! I've loved them since puberty, which is when I began to notice how the image of a damsel in distress moved me... more if you have them!!

    Wednesday, October 29th 2008 - 03:32:13 AM

    Name: Sardu

    Ralphus, I'm with you. You know I'm a bondage and torture guy like yourself, but I'm also a big fan of the Damsel in Distress.

    I would give the film a B+, and that is because there is no bondage, and the torture is implied and not shown.

    There is something to be said for a completely naked terrified babe, running through vast wilderness... her tits bobbing up and down, being hunted by a psycho with a crossbow. Were this not well acted, and the situation believable (i.e. a Wave production), then it would garner a lower grade.

    A real effort was made to treat the subject matter seriously, and it shows.

    Wednesday, October 29th 2008 - 12:54:07 PM

    Name: John Galt

    Ha ha, Scribbler! I like the Halloween themed change to the forum graphic. Now I'm picturing a horn of plenty and a long candy cane for the next two months.

    Thursday, October 30th 2008 - 10:47:27 AM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    I was wondering if anyone was going to comment on the Halloween embellishment to our banner. Very cool, Scribber. Too bad Halloween is officially over in a few days, but I hope you'll keep it that way a little longer.

    Let's see, so far we've had her with blonde hair, brown hair, anime eyes (that was freaky), impaled with an HOM wooden dildo board and now with a wicked jack o' lantern with a bone for a nose. I'm sure he'll come up with something topical come Thanksgiving.

    Sardu: The link for the review you posted for Naked Fear is in my Homepage URL above. Again, thanks for gracing us with the information; it's always appreciated.

    Boy, it's been quiet here lately. Anybody seen any good movies? Anybody seen any bad ones? With 900-1000 people visiting this site everyday, you'd think a few of us would be willing to share information about what kind of bondage entertainment they've seen recently. Even mainstream stuff with GIMP-worthy potential is useful. We rely on you guys to let us know if there's anything worth checking out, or even staying away from. You certainly don't have to write a full-length review, even just a capsule description can be very helpful.

    I wish I could contribute more, but I never seem to have time to watch much bondage material anymore, what with the rush to preserve what we're going to lose once AOL cuts off all our pictures tomorrow. I've been trying to save the links to pictures in the Guestbook Archives first, since I would often post with pictures in my Homepage URL and they were usually on my AOL free space. So far, I'm going backwards and I've gotten 2008, 2007 and part of 2006 restored. Then I'll be attempting the long process of rebuilding the databases after that. It sucks that AOL only gave us a one month warning to save what we had before they delete everything permanently. It takes a while to redo all the links, especially since there's several years worth, but I'll get them all restored eventually.

    Thursday, October 30th 2008 - 06:25:51 PM

    Name: Sloth
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Mornin All

    Well Ralphus, let me give you a rundown on "Red Ridge" with a bit more detail than BigD had.

    The storyline runs as follows - man who is having difficulties with his wife because of his drinking habits travels to meet her at the home of a recently deceased relative. They are to be joined there by the wife's younger sister who is traveling with a young male pal. The villains are in the habit of abducting nubile young specimens and using them as unwilling participants at their house of ill repute. At the films onset they waylay a couple of young chicanas then get hold of young sister after killing her friend. It continues with husband and wife trying to locate sis with wife falling into the villain's clutches as well. The balance of the film has hubbie having to deal with a bunch of goobers along the Tex-Mex border and eventually rescuing his fam.

    As stated by BigD there are some decent Gimp moments in the film. Sis spends most of the flick handcuffed to a bed and is later joined in the same bed by big sis. As the villains consider the young one an escape risk one of them breaks her toe. The other villain says "break two more" then exits the room and stands in the hallway to hear the snap-crackle-pop and her screams. She is usually tape gagged through the movie. Toward the end one of the villains rapes the bound chicana in another room although it's far too dimly lit to see anything. He then handcuffs and tape gags her and gives her an OTS to the yard where awaits a metal trellis. She is stood on an old food container can and noosed. All hell breaks loose in the next few minutes as hubby does his rescue thing. He also attempts to rescue the noosed chick but that falls apart as she hangs. Most of the hanging is done in cut-aways to other action taking place then back. They finally get her down but it seems she died although that's somewhat in question.

    Now, can I give it high Gimp worthy grades - no, not really. The moments are too short but are rather well done.

    With that said, this is really a well made movie and I found it very entertaining. Considering the budget limitations and how difficult it is the stage some of this stuff, especially a hanging, they did a nice job. It was a plesant surprise well worth my rental money. With a budget these folks are capable of producing something truly Gimp-worthy. The acting is very good, the lasses were very attractive and the villains are about the most evil I've seen lately - you know, my kind of guys.

    Stay Well All

    Friday, October 31st 2008 - 08:29:33 AM

    Name: Jefferson James
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    I sort of watched Winter of 1849 (1976). I fast forwarded through most of it and quit watching soon after the rape scene. The scene wasn't awful, but it was nothing special either. The virgin victim protested the entire time, but resistance and actual distress were minimal. She didn't have supermodel looks, but in my book that is a plus because it seemed more realistic. The aftermath was almost comical. She just laid there not even covering her breasts when the now dead rapist's partners returned, and moments later she was having consensual sex with one of them. "I've been raped, my mother killed him while he still lying on top of me, let's all fuck!" C-

    Friday, October 31st 2008 - 12:26:43 PM

    Name: Ralphus
    E-mail address:
    Homepage URL:

    Sloth: Thanks for the info on Red Ridge. Since the earlier link for the film's website has scrolled off, I put it in my Homepage URL. There's some nice vidcaps of women in peril in the Media section.

    I know you said you can't give it a high Gimpworthy grade, but can you come up with an actual grade so I can add what you posted to the Reviews section? I know it's not your typical full-length Sloth review but there's enough there to be useful information for the other readers. In fact, based on that and the stills from the site, I added the film to my Netflix queue. You can't beat that box cover, either. They know how to market their movie!


    Jefferson James: I had never even heard of The Winter of 1849 so I consulted the IMDB...and didn't find it. Not at first, anyway. Have you noticed the IMDB censors out adult titles when it comes to their search function? I've had problems finding other adult titles there before and I finally realized why. Oh, the title is there, but I had to go through Google then it led me to the actual IMDB link. Doesn't say much about it, other than the lead is played by Andrea True. Is she the actual victim in the scene? I'm assuming so, but let me know. I added the synopsis to the Adult Movies database.

    Speaking of the databases, I checked this morning and sure enough, all the vidcaps we used to have inside (except for some that are hosted by Imagevenue) are now gone. AOL permanently deleted all their free space for their subscribers, so probably 98% of our stills have been replaced with little boxes with red X's inside them. So that's my next project, putting everything back again. Oh, joy.

    Friday, October 31st 2008 - 09:26:50 PM

    Previous - September 2008

    Next - November 2008