Try "CruelPunishment159"! I think you will like her screams.
And she points her toes while being tortured, too!

BTW, the C4S preview shows a nice view, but it doesn't preview her screams.


You are right, she does emote well with the extra of pointing toes. My permanent complaint with Alex's work is that the interrogation scenes tend to be repetitive and static, without an active interaction between detainee and interrogator, after a few minutes it just turns repetitive and even boring.
I agree with you there. That's what motivated me to try something different with the Dr. Squalus series. There's no interrogation; just a woman having her body humiliated and abused.
I think I understand your viewpoint.
 
 You are a naughty boy, 02.yyy02 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 4:11 pmI think I understand your viewpoint.
But it's hard for me to get bored watching a beautiful victim, naked and tied in the manner I like, suffer a variety of tortures. But then, I'm not in the habit of watching the videos from start to finish, either. I usually don't last that long.
I really would like it if Alex would just shoot enough so he didn't have to reuse footage. I honestly think he would benefit from a little shorter, "punchier" videos. His newest editor does great with continuity and seems sharp enough to solve that problem. But they need to be given enough raw footage to use.

I agree about the short and "punchier" approach. The other problem with this type of production is financial. Unfortunately with the meager resources available there is no way anyone can produce what mainstream producers can. There are scenes in cinema that last less than five minutes but are intense and memorable.yyy02 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 4:11 pmI think I understand your viewpoint.
I really would like it if Alex would just shoot enough so he didn't have to reuse footage. I honestly think he would benefit from a little shorter, "punchier" videos. His newest editor does great with continuity and seems sharp enough to solve that problem. But they need to be given enough raw footage to use.
frog wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2024 9:08 amI agree about the short and "punchier" approach. The other problem with this type of production is financial. Unfortunately with the meager resources available there is no way anyone can produce what mainstream producers can. There are scenes in cinema that last less than five minutes but are intense and memorable.yyy02 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2024 4:11 pmI think I understand your viewpoint.
I really would like it if Alex would just shoot enough so he didn't have to reuse footage. I honestly think he would benefit from a little shorter, "punchier" videos. His newest editor does great with continuity and seems sharp enough to solve that problem. But they need to be given enough raw footage to use.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests