I just finished watching Sexy Shocker Hardcore Horrors Volume 4 offered by Something Weird Video and this one had some GIMP. Sort of. The two titles in this volume are The Geek and Sex in '69.
The Geek (1971)
Something Weird Video bills this as The Geek and, surprisingly, that seems to be its only title. It could be described as "Three young couples hike into the wilderness in search of the elusive Sasquatch but the sex-hungry monster finds them first and attacks and rapes two of the women." And while it would be an accurate description, it would be misleading as hell, hinting as it does at brutal monster rape.
This movie is divided into three alternating sequences: (1) the nature walk, (2) XXX sex, and (3) Sasquatch rape. Fast forward to the 37:15 minute mark for the Sasquatch sex. The movie is only 50 minutes long, and the two Sasquatch rapes happen in the last 13 or so minutes.
So we begin with a nature walk and annoying narration telling us all about the legend of the Sasquatch, or Bigfoot, or, as it is referred to in this flick, The Geek. Three couples drive up in a VW microbus and start off hiking in single file. Nature walk time. They reach the campsite and set up camp. At the 11:30 minute mark, the first couple wander off and have XXX sex in the Great Outdoors. That lasts until the 18:30 minute mark. They wander back to camp. There is dialog. The second couple go into their tent and have XXX sex beginning at the 20:15 minute mark and ending at the 29:05 minute mark.
The next day they continue the nature walk until they find evidence of the Sasquatch. They walk up a slight hill and wait, like they are all hidden and out of sight or something but really, they are just hunkered down on the crest of a hill. Sure enough, the Sasquatch appears and I cannot even begin to describe how lame the costume is. Words fail me. The couple who did not previously have sex walk out to greet the Sasquatch. The guy hangs back. The girl walks right up and holds out her hand in greeting. The Sasquatch smells her hair, then gropes her, then pushes her to the ground and suddenly her pants are off and he is fucking her doggie style. She is participating, but no she's being raped, but no she's moving back against him, but no she collapses in exhaustion. I'm thinking there was confused direction and she wasn't sure what her motivation was for the scene. So technically she was raped. The whole sequence lasts about a minute from start to end, and there is nothing XXX about it.
The Sasquatch wanders off and the guy, who apparently just kind of stood there watching her getting fucked by the big hairy monster, rushes over and she cries in his arms. This is just another one of those instances where the girl is all for the rough and kinky outdoor sex but then cries rape afterward I guess.
The others walk down and one guy asks the other if he got it all on film. Okay, is it just me or does it kind of suck that these guys just sat up on the hill watching and filming the girl get fucked doggie style by a big hairy monster? Suddenly, the Sasquatch is back! They all flee, but the first girl to do XXX sex stumbles (ha ha) and the Sasquatch does her doggie style. He also fingers her and either smells her or licks her or just leans in close for a better view of her while she is bent over, patiently waiting for him to finish. Then he lays down beside her and cuddles for a while, then they take a brief, 20-second nap, then he gets up and starts to wander away when the three guys close in and an insipid fight scene ensues, but really they all just kind of run at the monster and he kind of dodges them, or sidesteps and pushes them away.
Finally tired of playing, the Sasquatch wanders off. The three guys regroup and male bond and one of them vows, "Someday I'm gonna get that filthy animal!" The girls return and help the most recently raped one pull up her pants, and they all walk off, presumably in the direction of the VW microbus, having communed with nature enough for one day.
So there were two rape scenes where the ridiculously costumed Sasquatch fucks two of the three girls doggie style (one at a time). Oh yeah. And Sasquatch has a little white limp dick, too, which we got to see once. No screaming or struggling. No real violence at all. This gets a D-. Also some XXX sex. About 16 minutes worth. But the girls are nothing to write home about. Give this one a pass.
-----
Sin in '69 (1969)
The second feature on the Sexy Shocker Hardcore Horrors Volume 4 DVD is Sin in '69.
This is a confusing wreck of a movie, but someone who wanted to trick GIMP fans into buying or watching it would say it features a mysterious unknown sexually repressed killer who attacks and murders young women, tearing off their clothes in the process. That happens at the very beginning, about 26 minutes in, and at the very end. The first attack involves exposed breasts and although the killer "chokes" the girl to death, it looks like he is using shoestrings and she is already playing dead while he is still pretending to choke her to death. Lame, lame, lame. When he walks off, we see his white shoes. I can remember back in the 60s when I wore white shoes, I am ashamed to admit. So I am reluctant to suggest that anyone who wears white shoes is obviously a sexually repressed killer. But this guy is.
The second attack involves a girl in a white outfit and there is no nudity. Not even any choking. He is just struggling on top of her in the grass partially hidden behind a bush and then she goes still and he walks off with her purse, and we see he is wearing his white shoes.
The third attack happens in bed, with a guy still fully clothed in really ugly 60s clothes with a completely naked gal--and he's wearing white shoes! OMG! It's the killer! They are kind of necking, the naked gal and the white-shoe-wearing killer, when he pulls a butcher knife out from behind his back and tries to stab her. She struggles and screams. People rush in. He drops the knife and sits on the floor crying because he is in love with his sister. The end. OMFG.
There is XXX sex in this movie, scattered throughout in barely connected vignettes. The worst part of the movie is the folk singer who strums her guitar and "sings" a really, really bad song, really badly, during an orgy. I was idly wishing the killer would appear and snap the guitar strings off and bind her wrists and ankles with them and then bend her over and rape her with the guitar, which would increase the GIMP factor and stop her singing, a win-win situation in my book. But that didn't happen. It would have been a far superior movie if it had, believe me.
A cautionary review, blah blah blah. Three attacks but no rapes, no bondage, no gags, no attractive women, not even good attack violence. Since it involves sexually motivated attacks, with some nudity, it does not get off with an N/A rating. Instead, it is an F.